pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05290 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🪐 quant-ph · hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Krylov Dynamics and Operator Growth in Time-Dependent Systems via Lie Algebras

Adolfo del Campo, Andr\'as Grabarits, E. Medina-Guerra

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph hep-th
keywords Krylov dynamicstime-dependent HamiltoniansLie algebrasoperator growthsl(2,C) subalgebraKrylov complexityquantum speed limits
0
0 comments X

The pith

Time-dependent quantum evolution in Krylov space is governed by an embedded sl(2,C) subalgebra under minimal Lie-algebraic conditions on the Hamiltonian.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework that ties the evolution of operators in the minimal Krylov subspace directly to the Lie-algebraic properties of a time-dependent Hamiltonian. It shows that the interaction-picture Hamiltonian generates the exact dynamics via ladder operators when an sl(2,C) subalgebra is embedded in the structure. This yields a single-exponential form for the time-evolution operator that maps to a time-independent Krylov problem in a rotated basis. The same algebraic setup produces a quantum speed limit on complexity growth whose saturation occurs only when the Hamiltonian commutes with itself at different times.

Core claim

We identify the minimal conditions under which the exact time-dependent Krylov dynamics is naturally determined by the interaction-picture Hamiltonian and governed by an embedded sl(2,C) subalgebra. An exact single-exponential representation of the time-evolution operator gives rise to a distinct time-independent Krylov dynamics in a unitarily related basis. The framework extends to the oscillator algebra, Virasoro subalgebras, spins in rotating fields, and multi-level systems, while a new speed limit on complexity growth retains the time-independent functional form but saturates only for commuting Hamiltonians.

What carries the argument

the embedded sl(2,C) subalgebra generated by the interaction-picture Hamiltonian, whose ladder operators produce the exact time-dependent Krylov subspace evolution.

If this is right

  • The time-dependent Krylov subspace dynamics is generated exactly by the ladder operators of the associated Lie algebra.
  • A single-exponential time-evolution operator produces time-independent Krylov dynamics in a unitarily equivalent basis from which the original dynamics can be recovered.
  • The framework applies directly to the oscillator algebra, closed Virasoro subalgebras, spins in rotating magnetic fields, and higher-dimensional multi-level systems.
  • A new quantum speed limit on complexity growth retains the same functional form as the time-independent case but saturates only when the Hamiltonian commutes with itself at different times.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Algebraic reduction may enable exact simulation of driven systems without truncating the Krylov space.
  • The commuting-Hamiltonian condition for speed-limit saturation suggests a link to integrable or Floquet-stable regimes.
  • The same ladder-operator structure could be tested in driven quantum optics or NMR experiments with known Lie-algebra generators.

Load-bearing premise

The time-dependent Hamiltonian must possess an underlying Lie-algebraic structure that permits its dynamics to be generated by ladder operators of an associated algebra including an embedded sl(2,C) subalgebra.

What would settle it

Compute the Krylov basis and operator growth for a concrete time-dependent Hamiltonian that lacks an sl(2,C) embedding; the growth will deviate from the ladder-operator prediction if the central claim is false.

read the original abstract

We study quantum dynamics generated by time-dependent Hamiltonians in Krylov space, the minimal subspace in which the evolution takes place. We establish a direct link between dynamics in the time-dependent Krylov subspace and the underlying Lie-algebraic structure of the Hamiltonian. We develop a general framework in which the dynamics in the time-dependent Krylov subspace is generated by ladder operators of the associated Lie algebra. In particular, we identify the minimal conditions under which the exact time-dependent Krylov dynamics is naturally determined by the interaction-picture Hamiltonian and governed by an embedded $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ subalgebra. We further show that an exact single-exponential representation of the time-evolution operator gives rise to a distinct time-independent Krylov dynamics in a unitarily related basis, from which the exact time-dependent Krylov dynamics can nevertheless be recovered. We also extend the framework to the oscillator algebra as the simplest extension of the nilpotent Heisenberg--Weyl algebra, and provide further examples, including the translated and dilated harmonic oscillator, systems governed by closed Virasoro subalgebras, a spin in a rotating magnetic field, and higher-dimensional generalizations for multi-level systems. In addition, we introduce a new quantum speed limit to the complexity growth rate generated by a time-dependent generator and show that, for evolutions governed by a Lie algebra, it retains the same functional form as in the time-independent case. Remarkably, saturation of this bound is strongly affected by temporal driving and persists only when the Hamiltonian commutes with itself at different times. These results establish a unified framework for characterizing operator growth and Krylov complexity in time-dependent quantum systems with underlying Lie-algebraic structures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Lie-algebraic framework for analyzing Krylov dynamics and operator growth under time-dependent Hamiltonians. It identifies the minimal conditions under which the exact time-dependent Krylov dynamics is determined by the interaction-picture Hamiltonian and governed by an embedded sl(2,C) subalgebra, derives an exact single-exponential representation of the time-evolution operator that yields time-independent Krylov dynamics in a unitarily related basis, extends the construction to the oscillator algebra and closed Virasoro subalgebras, works out explicit examples (rotating spin, translated/dilated oscillator, multi-level systems), and introduces a quantum speed limit on complexity growth that retains the same functional form as the time-independent case and saturates precisely when [H(t), H(t')] = 0.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a unified, algebraically grounded approach to Krylov complexity in driven systems that possess underlying Lie structures. The explicit constructions, the recovery of time-dependent dynamics from the unitarily related basis, the worked examples, and the clean saturation condition for the new speed limit constitute concrete advances that can be directly applied to concrete models without additional fitting parameters.

minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] In the abstract and introduction, the phrase 'naturally determined by the interaction-picture Hamiltonian' should be accompanied by a one-sentence restatement of the precise minimal conditions to avoid any ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with the Lie-algebraic setup.
  2. [§4] The transition from the time-dependent Krylov subspace to the unitarily related time-independent basis (around the single-exponential representation) would benefit from an explicit diagram or short table comparing the two bases and the ladder operators in each.
  3. [§6.3] In the Virasoro-subalgebra example, confirm that the truncation to a finite-dimensional Krylov space is stated explicitly and that the speed-limit saturation is verified numerically or algebraically for that case.
  4. [§7] A brief remark on the relation of the new speed limit to existing time-dependent bounds (e.g., Mandelstam-Tamm or Margolus-Levitin generalizations) would help situate the result for the broader community.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. We are pleased that the Lie-algebraic unification of Krylov dynamics for time-dependent Hamiltonians, the sl(2,C) embedding, the single-exponential representation, the oscillator/Virasoro extensions, the explicit examples, and the quantum speed limit with its saturation condition are viewed as concrete advances.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained via Lie algebra properties

full rationale

The manuscript constructs its framework directly from the Lie-algebraic structure of the Hamiltonian, deriving the interaction-picture reduction, ladder-operator generators, single-exponential form, and recovery in the unitarily related basis through explicit algebraic manipulations and proofs. Examples (rotating spin, translated/dilated oscillator, Virasoro subalgebras) are computed explicitly without parameter fitting or renaming of known results as new predictions. The introduced speed limit follows from the same Lie-algebraic setup and retains its functional form under the stated conditions, with saturation tied to [H(t), H(t')] = 0 by direct calculation rather than by construction from inputs. No self-citation is load-bearing for the central claims, and all steps remain independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard mathematical properties of Lie algebras and their representations applied to quantum operators; no new free parameters or invented physical entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Lie algebras admit ladder operators that generate dynamics within associated representations
    Invoked to link Krylov subspace evolution to the algebraic structure of the Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption Time-dependent Hamiltonians can be analyzed in the interaction picture while preserving Lie-algebraic relations
    Used to identify minimal conditions for exact Krylov dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5613 in / 1417 out tokens · 33295 ms · 2026-05-08T17:28:12.915482+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Universal Operator Growth Hypothesis,

    Daniel E. Parker, Xiangyu Cao, Alexander Avdoshkin, Thomas Scaffidi, and Ehud Altman. A universal operator growth hypothesis.Physical Review X, 9(4):041017, October 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041017. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.041017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.9.041017 2019

  2. [2]

    Quantum dynamics in Operator space: Methods and applications,

    Pratik Nandy, Apollonas S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, Pablo Mart´ ınez-Azcona, Anatoly Dymarsky, and Adolfo del Campo. Quantum dynamics in krylov space: Methods and applications.Physics Reports, 1125–1128:1–82, June 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2025.05.001. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2025.05.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2025.05.001 2025

  3. [3]

    Heller, and Nicole Yunger Halpern

    Stefano Baiguera, Vijay Balasubramanian, Pawel Caputa, Shira Chapman, Jonas Haferkamp, Michal P. Heller, and Nicole Yunger Halpern. Quantum complexity in gravity, quantum field theory, and quantum information science.Physics Reports, 1159:1–77, 2026. ISSN 0370-1573. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2025.11.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/scie...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2025.11.001 2026

  4. [4]

    Rabinovici, A

    Eliezer Rabinovici, Adri´ an S´ anchez-Garrido, Ruth Shir, and Julian Sonner. Krylov complexity, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.06286

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Geometry of Krylov complexity,

    Pawe l Caputa, Javier M. Mag´ an, and Dimitrios Patramanis. Geometry of krylov complexity. Physical Review Research, 4(1):013041, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013041. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013041

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013041 2022

  6. [6]

    Quantum chaos and the complex- ity of Krylov of states,

    Vijay Balasubramanian, Pawe l Caputa, Javier M. Mag´ an, and Qingyue Wu. Quantum chaos and the complexity of spread of states.Physical Review D, 106(4):046007, August 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.046007. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.046007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.046007 2022

  7. [7]

    Krylov complexity in conformal field theory,

    Anatoly Dymarsky and Michael Smolkin. Krylov complexity in conformal field theory. Physical Review D, 104(8):L081702, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.L081702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.l081702 2021

  8. [8]

    Quantum chaos as delocalization in krylov space

    Anatoly Dymarsky and Alexander Gorsky. Quantum chaos as delocalization in krylov space. Physical Review B, 102(8):085137, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085137. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.085137

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.102.085137 2020

  9. [9]

    Krylov complexity from integrability to chaos.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(7):151, 2022

    Eliezer Rabinovici, Adri´ an S´ anchez-Garrido, Ruth Shir, and Julian Sonner. Krylov complexity from integrability to chaos.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(7):151, 2022. doi: 10.1007/JHEP07(2022)151

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022)151 2022

  10. [10]

    Krylov complexity in quantum field theory, and beyond,

    Alexander Avdoshkin, Anatoly Dymarsky, and Michael Smolkin. Krylov complexity in quantum field theory, and beyond.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2024(6):066, 2024. doi: 10.1007/JHEP06(2024)066

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2024)066 2024

  11. [11]

    H¨ ornedal, N

    Niklas H¨ ornedal, Nicoletta Carabba, Apollonas S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, and Adolfo del Campo. Ultimate speed limits to the growth of operator complexity.Communications Physics, 5:207, 2022. doi: 10.1038/s42005-022-00985-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-022-00985-1 2022

  12. [12]

    Krylov complexity under hamiltonian deformations and toda flows.Phys

    Kazutaka Takahashi, Pratik Nandy, and Adolfo del Campo. Krylov complexity under hamiltonian deformations and toda flows.Phys. Rev. B, 113:144312, Apr 2026. doi: 10.1103/zt9g-scp5. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/zt9g-scp5

    work page doi:10.1103/zt9g-scp5 2026

  13. [13]

    Geometric Operator Quantum Speed Limit, Wegner Hamiltonian Flow and Operator Growth

    Niklas H¨ ornedal, Nicoletta Carabba, Kazutaka Takahashi, and Adolfo del Campo. Geometric Operator Quantum Speed Limit, Wegner Hamiltonian Flow and Operator Growth. Quantum, 7:1055, July 2023. ISSN 2521-327X. doi: 10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1055. URL https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1055. – 40 –

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-07-11-1055 2023

  14. [14]

    Shortcuts to adiabaticity in krylov space.Phys

    Kazutaka Takahashi and Adolfo del Campo. Shortcuts to adiabaticity in krylov space.Phys. Rev. X, 14:011032, Feb 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011032. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.011032

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.011032 2024

  15. [15]

    Pedro H. S. Bento, Adolfo del Campo, and Lucas C. C´ eleri. Krylov complexity and dynamical phase transition in the quenched lipkin-meshkov-glick model.Phys. Rev. B, 109: 224304, Jun 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.224304. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.224304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.224304 2024

  16. [16]

    Universal growth of krylov complexity across a quantum phase transition, 2025

    Andr´ as Grabarits and Adolfo del Campo. Universal growth of krylov complexity across a quantum phase transition, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13947

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Bhargava, Sebasti´ an V

    Anne-Maria Visuri, Alejandro Gomez Cadavid, Balaganchi A. Bhargava, Sebasti´ an V. Romero, Andr´ as Grabarits, Pranav Chandarana, Enrique Solano, Adolfo del Campo, and Narendra N. Hegade. Digitized counterdiabatic quantum critical dynamics.npj Quantum Information, 12(1):47, Mar 2026. ISSN 2056-6387. doi: 10.1038/s41534-026-01208-z. URL https://doi.org/10....

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01208-z 2026

  18. [18]

    Krylov subspace methods for quantum dynamics with time-dependent generators.Physical Review Letters, 134(3):030401, 2025

    Kazutaka Takahashi and Adolfo del Campo. Krylov subspace methods for quantum dynamics with time-dependent generators.Physical Review Letters, 134(3):030401, 2025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.030401. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.030401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.030401 2025

  19. [19]

    Nizami and Ankit W

    Amin A. Nizami and Ankit W. Shrestha. Krylov construction and complexity for driven quantum systems.Physical Review E, 108(5):054222, November 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.108.054222. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.108.054222

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.108.054222 2023

  20. [20]

    Nizami and Ankit W

    Amin A. Nizami and Ankit W. Shrestha. Spread complexity and quantum chaos for periodically driven spin chains.Phys. Rev. E, 110:034201, Sep 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.110.034201. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.110.034201

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.110.034201 2024

  21. [21]

    Philippe Suchsland, Roderich Moessner, and Pieter W. Claeys. Krylov complexity and trotter transitions in unitary circuit dynamics.Phys. Rev. B, 111:014309, Jan 2025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.014309. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.014309

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.014309 2025

  22. [22]

    Lewis, H

    Jr. Lewis, H. R. and W. B. Riesenfeld. An exact quantum theory of the time-dependent harmonic oscillator and of a charged particle in a time-dependent electromagnetic field. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 10(8):1458–1473, August 1969. doi: 10.1063/1.1664991. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664991

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1664991 1969

  23. [23]

    Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2001

    Ali Mostafazadeh.Dynamical Invariants, Adiabatic Approximation and the Geometric Phase. Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2001. ISBN 978-1-59033-013-5

    2001

  24. [24]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies.Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1982. ISBN 978-0-521-23385-9. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511622632

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 1982

  25. [25]

    Chapter 2 - shortcuts to adiabaticity

    Erik Torrontegui, Sara Ib´ a˜ nez, Sofia Mart´ ınez-Garaot, Michele Modugno, Adolfo del Campo, David Gu´ ery-Odelin, Andreas Ruschhaupt, Xi Chen, and Juan Gonzalo Muga. Chapter 2 - shortcuts to adiabaticity. In Ennio Arimondo, Paul R. Berman, and Chun C. Lin, editors, Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, volume 62 ofAdvances In Atomic, Mole...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-408090-4.00002-5 2013

  26. [26]

    A. M. Perelomov. Coherent states for arbitrary lie group.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 26(3):222–236, 1972. doi: 10.1007/BF01645091. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645091

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01645091 1972

  27. [27]

    A. M. Perelomov. Generalized coherent states and some of their applications.Soviet Physics Uspekhi, 20(9):703–720, September 1977. doi: 10.1070/PU1977v020n09ABEH005459. URL https://doi.org/10.1070/PU1977v020n09ABEH005459

    work page doi:10.1070/pu1977v020n09abeh005459 1977

  28. [28]

    Perelomov,Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1986); [doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61629-7]

    Askold Perelomov.Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986. ISBN 978-3-540-15912-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-61629-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61629-7 1986

  29. [29]

    Decomposition formulas for su(1, 1) and su(2) lie algebras and their applications in quantum optics.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 10(8): 1347–1359, August 1993

    Masashi Ban. Decomposition formulas for su(1, 1) and su(2) lie algebras and their applications in quantum optics.Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 10(8): 1347–1359, August 1993. doi: 10.1364/JOSAB.10.001347. URL https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.10.001347

    work page doi:10.1364/josab.10.001347 1993

  30. [30]

    Coherent states: Theory and some applications.Reviews of Modern Physics, 62(4):867–927, 1990

    Wei-Min Zhang, Da Hsuan Feng, and Robert Gilmore. Coherent states: Theory and some applications.Reviews of Modern Physics, 62(4):867–927, 1990. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.62.867. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.62.867

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.62.867 1990

  31. [31]

    Probing the entanglement of operator growth.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(6):063A01, 2022

    Dimitrios Patramanis. Probing the entanglement of operator growth.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2022(6):063A01, 2022. doi: 10.1093/ptep/ptac081. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptac081

    work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac081 2022

  32. [32]

    Lie algebraic solution of linear differential equations

    James Wei and Edward Norman. Lie algebraic solution of linear differential equations. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 4(4):575–581, 1963. doi: 10.1063/1.1703993. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1703993

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1703993 1963

  33. [33]

    Wei–norman equations for a unitary evolution.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46(26):265208, June 2013

    Szymon Charzy´ nski and Marek Ku´ s. Wei–norman equations for a unitary evolution.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 46(26):265208, June 2013. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/46/26/265208. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/46/26/265208

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/46/26/265208 2013

  34. [34]

    Explicit wei–norman formulae for matrix lie groups via putzer’s method

    Claudio Altafini. Explicit wei–norman formulae for matrix lie groups via putzer’s method. Systems & Control Letters, 54(11):1121–1130, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2005.03.006. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2005.03.006

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sysconle.2005.03.006 2005

  35. [35]

    Eberly.Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms

    Leslie Allen and Joseph H. Eberly.Optical Resonance and Two-Level Atoms. Interscience Monographs and Texts in Physics and Astronomy. Wiley, New York, 1975

    1975

  36. [36]

    Morris and Bruce W

    James R. Morris and Bruce W. Shore. Reduction of degenerate two-level excitation to independent two-state systems.Physical Review A, 27(2):906–912, 1983. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.27.906. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.27.906

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.27.906 1983

  37. [37]

    Viswanath and G

    V. Viswanath and G. M¨ uller.The Recursion Method: Application to Many-Body Dynamics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1994. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-48651-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48651-0 1994

  38. [38]

    Krylov localization and suppression of complexity.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(3):211,

    Eliezer Rabinovici, Adri´ an S´ anchez-Garrido, Ruth Shir, and Julian Sonner. Krylov localization and suppression of complexity.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(3):211,

    2022

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2022)211

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)211 2022

  40. [40]

    Humphreys.Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, volume 9 of – 42 – Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    James E. Humphreys.Introduction to Lie Algebras and Representation Theory, volume 9 of – 42 – Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, revised edition, 1978. ISBN 978-0-387-90053-7. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-6398-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-6398-2 1978

  41. [41]

    Di Francesco, P

    Philippe Di Francesco, Pierre Mathieu, and David S´ en´ echal.Conformal Field Theory. Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics. Springer, New York, 1997. ISBN 978-0-387-94785-3. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2256-9 1997

  42. [42]

    Some basics of su(1,1).Revista Brasileira de Ensino de F´ ısica, 26(4): 351–357, 2004

    Marcel Novaes. Some basics of su(1,1).Revista Brasileira de Ensino de F´ ısica, 26(4): 351–357, 2004. doi: 10.1590/S1806-11172004000400012. URL https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-11172004000400012

    work page doi:10.1590/s1806-11172004000400012 2004

  43. [43]

    M. A. Lohe. Exact time dependence of solutions to the time-dependent schr¨ odinger equation. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 42(3):035307, 2009. doi: 10.1088/1751-8113/42/3/035307. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/42/3/035307

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/42/3/035307 2009

  44. [44]

    J. G. Muga, X. Chen, S. Ib´ a˜ nez, I. Lizuain, and A. Ruschhaupt. Transitionless quantum drivings for the harmonic oscillator.Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics, 43(8):085509, April 2010. doi: 10.1088/0953-4075/43/8/085509. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/43/8/085509

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/43/8/085509 2010

  45. [45]

    Coelho, Lucas Queiroz, and Danilo T

    Stanley S. Coelho, Lucas Queiroz, and Danilo T. Alves. The time-dependent quantum harmonic oscillator: a pedagogical approach via the lewis–riesenfeld dynamical invariant method.European Journal of Physics, 46(4):045401, 2025. doi: 10.1088/1361-6404/add972. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/add972

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6404/add972 2025

  46. [46]

    Coelho, Lucas Queiroz, and Danilo T

    Stanley S. Coelho, Lucas Queiroz, and Danilo T. Alves. Exact solution of a time-dependent quantum harmonic oscillator with two frequency jumps via the lewis–riesenfeld dynamical invariant method.Entropy, 24(12):1851, December 2022. doi: 10.3390/e24121851. URL https://doi.org/10.3390/e24121851

    work page doi:10.3390/e24121851 2022

  47. [47]

    Bounds in nonequilibrium quantum dynamics

    Zongping Gong and Ryusuke Hamazaki. Bounds in nonequilibrium quantum dynamics. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 36(31):2230007, 2022. doi: 10.1142/S0217979222300079. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979222300079

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217979222300079 2022

  48. [48]

    Springer Theses

    Nicoletta Carabba.Quantum Speed Limits to Operator Growth. Springer Theses. Springer Cham, 1 edition, 2024. ISBN 978-3-031-74178-4. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-74179-1. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74179-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-74179-1 2024

  49. [49]

    The growth of operator entropy in operator growth.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(8):232, Aug 2022

    Zhong-Ying Fan. The growth of operator entropy in operator growth.Journal of High Energy Physics, 2022(8):232, Aug 2022. ISSN 1029-8479. doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)232. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP08(2022)232

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)232 2022

  50. [50]

    Speed limits and scrambling in krylov space.Phys

    Ankit Gill and Tapobrata Sarkar. Speed limits and scrambling in krylov space.Phys. Rev. B, 111:184307, May 2025. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.111.184307. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.184307. – 43 –

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.184307 2025