pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05322 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Automorphic Structures of Heterotic Vacua

Jacob M. Leedom , Nicole Righi , Alexander Westphal
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords moduli stabilizationheterotic stringsSp(4,Z) dualitySiegel modular formsde Sitter no-go theoremsWilson linessupersymmetry breakingscalar potential
0
0 comments X

The pith

In heterotic-inspired theories with Sp(4,Z) duality, the group's fixed points are extrema of the scalar potential, supporting genus-2 no-go theorems for de Sitter vacua while allowing metastable positive-energy minima after dilaton supersy

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines moduli stabilization in four-dimensional effective theories inspired by heterotic orbifold compactifications that include Wilson lines. These setups enhance the target-space duality from SL(2,Z) to Sp(4,Z), so Siegel modular forms become the right language for the supergravity action that includes moduli-dependent threshold corrections to gauge couplings and nonperturbative superpotential terms. The authors compute the resulting scalar potential and prove that its extrema occur precisely at the fixed points of Sp(4,Z). They derive genus-two versions of no-go theorems that forbid de Sitter solutions, yet show that breaking supersymmetry through nonperturbative corrections to the Kähler potential in the dilaton direction can produce metastable states with positive energy. A sympathetic reader would care because the construction ties string duality symmetries directly to the structure of the vacuum landscape and its cosmological viability.

Core claim

We show that the fixed points of Sp(4,Z) are extrema of the potential, and derive genus-2 analogues of no-go theorems for de Sitter vacua. Finally, we show how positive-energy metastable minima can arise once supersymmetry is broken in the dilaton direction by nonperturbative contributions to the Kähler potential.

What carries the argument

The Sp(4,Z) duality group acting on the moduli space, with Siegel modular forms encoding the effective supergravity action and cusp forms selected by the degeneration limit of the Wilson lines.

Load-bearing premise

The effective field theory approximation holds with the specific form of moduli-dependent threshold corrections and nonperturbative superpotential terms as dictated by the degeneration limit of the Wilson lines in heterotic orbifold compactifications.

What would settle it

Explicit evaluation of the scalar potential at a concrete Sp(4,Z) fixed point to check whether all first derivatives vanish, combined with a search for de Sitter critical points in the absence of nonperturbative dilaton Kähler corrections.

read the original abstract

We study moduli stabilization in 4D effective field theories with Sp(4,$\mathbb{Z}$) self-duality inspired by heterotic orbifold compactifications with Wilson lines. The target-space duality group of these theories is enhanced from SL$(2,\mathbb{Z})$ to Sp$(4,\mathbb{Z})$, making Siegel modular forms the appropriate language to formulate the effective supergravity action. We construct the corresponding effective theory including moduli-dependent threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic function and nonperturbative effects in the superpotential. The degeneration limit of the Wilson lines distinguishes different sectors and dictates which combination of cusp forms appears in threshold corrections. We compute the resulting scalar potential and prove several general statements about its extrema. In particular, we show that the fixed points of Sp$(4,\mathbb{Z})$ are extrema of the potential, and derive genus-2 analogues of no-go theorems for de Sitter vacua. Finally, we show how positive-energy metastable minima can arise once supersymmetry is broken in the dilaton direction by nonperturbative contributions to the K\"ahler potential.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes moduli stabilization in 4D effective supergravity theories inspired by heterotic orbifold compactifications with Wilson lines, where the target-space duality enhances from SL(2,Z) to Sp(4,Z). It constructs the effective action using Siegel modular forms to encode moduli-dependent threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic function and nonperturbative contributions to the superpotential and Kähler potential. The degeneration limit of the Wilson lines is used to select specific combinations of cusp forms. The authors prove that Sp(4,Z) fixed points are extrema of the resulting scalar potential, derive genus-2 analogues of no-go theorems for de Sitter vacua, and construct examples of positive-energy metastable minima arising when supersymmetry is broken in the dilaton direction by nonperturbative Kähler terms.

Significance. If the modeling of threshold corrections and nonperturbative terms holds, the work extends SL(2,Z)-based moduli stabilization results to Sp(4,Z) duality, providing general statements on extrema and no-go theorems that could constrain vacuum searches in heterotic models. The construction of metastable positive-energy minima offers a concrete mechanism for controlled de Sitter-like states, which is of phenomenological interest. The use of automorphic forms for explicit potential analysis is a strength, though the results remain tied to the effective field theory regime.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4 and §5.1] The proofs that Sp(4,Z) fixed points are extrema (§4, around the stationarity conditions derived from the potential) and the genus-2 no-go theorems for de Sitter vacua (§5.1) rest on the specific combination of Siegel cusp forms in the threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic function. The degeneration limit of the Wilson lines is asserted to dictate this combination, but no explicit uniqueness proof or exhaustive check against alternative cusp form combinations is provided; deviations would alter the potential and invalidate the stationarity and sign claims.
  2. [§6] The construction of positive-energy metastable minima after dilaton-direction SUSY breaking (§6) assumes a particular nonperturbative form for the Kähler potential corrections. The manuscript does not verify that this form is robust under higher-order string corrections or alternative degeneration behaviors, which is load-bearing for the positive-energy and metastability conclusions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§3] Notation for the Siegel modular forms and their weight assignments could be clarified with an explicit table or appendix listing the relevant cusp forms and their transformation properties under Sp(4,Z).
  2. [§4] A few equations in the potential derivation contain undefined symbols (e.g., the precise normalization of the nonperturbative superpotential term); these should be cross-referenced to earlier definitions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications based on the heterotic orbifold construction and the effective theory framework. We will incorporate revisions where they strengthen the presentation without altering the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4 and §5.1] The proofs that Sp(4,Z) fixed points are extrema (§4, around the stationarity conditions derived from the potential) and the genus-2 no-go theorems for de Sitter vacua (§5.1) rest on the specific combination of Siegel cusp forms in the threshold corrections to the gauge kinetic function. The degeneration limit of the Wilson lines is asserted to dictate this combination, but no explicit uniqueness proof or exhaustive check against alternative cusp form combinations is provided; deviations would alter the potential and invalidate the stationarity and sign claims.

    Authors: The specific linear combination of Siegel cusp forms in the threshold corrections is selected by the degeneration limit of the Wilson lines, which arises directly from the one-loop string computation in the heterotic orbifold compactification with Wilson lines. This limit physically corresponds to the regime in which the Wilson lines become large, fixing the modular weight and the cusp form basis via the matching of the effective gauge kinetic function to the string threshold integral. While we do not enumerate every conceivable combination of cusp forms (an infinite space), alternative combinations are excluded because they do not reproduce the degeneration behavior dictated by the underlying string model. We will revise the manuscript to include an expanded paragraph in §3 (or a new subsection in §4) that explicitly derives the selection rule from the Wilson line degeneration and states the physical consistency condition that rules out other combinations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§6] The construction of positive-energy metastable minima after dilaton-direction SUSY breaking (§6) assumes a particular nonperturbative form for the Kähler potential corrections. The manuscript does not verify that this form is robust under higher-order string corrections or alternative degeneration behaviors, which is load-bearing for the positive-energy and metastability conclusions.

    Authors: The nonperturbative Kähler potential corrections employed in §6 are the leading exponential terms generated by standard heterotic nonperturbative effects (gaugino condensation or world-sheet instantons) in the degeneration limit. This ansatz is the minimal form consistent with the effective supergravity approximation and the Sp(4,Z) duality. We acknowledge that higher-order string corrections could modify the precise coefficients, but such corrections are parametrically suppressed in the weak-coupling, large-volume regime of the effective theory. We will add a clarifying paragraph at the end of §6 that states the assumptions, the regime of validity, and the expected suppression of higher-order terms, thereby making the load-bearing nature of the approximation explicit. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivations rest on general properties of Siegel modular forms and effective supergravity

full rationale

The paper constructs the effective action with Sp(4,Z) duality and Siegel modular forms, incorporates threshold corrections whose cusp-form combination is selected by the Wilson-line degeneration limit, and then computes the scalar potential to prove that Sp(4,Z) fixed points are extrema and to obtain genus-2 no-go theorems for de Sitter vacua. These statements follow from the standard structure of the N=1 supergravity potential (Kähler potential plus superpotential) once the modular forms are inserted; they do not reduce by construction to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, nor to self-citations whose content is presupposed. The degeneration limit supplies an external physical criterion that distinguishes sectors, rather than an internal ansatz or self-referential fit. No load-bearing step equates a claimed result to its own input.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions from heterotic string theory and the mathematical framework of Siegel modular forms; no explicit free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The target-space duality group is enhanced from SL(2,Z) to Sp(4,Z) in heterotic orbifold compactifications with Wilson lines.
    Stated as the starting point inspired by the compactifications.
  • domain assumption Siegel modular forms provide the appropriate language to formulate the effective supergravity action including threshold corrections.
    Follows directly from the enhanced duality group.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5486 in / 1531 out tokens · 22772 ms · 2026-05-08T17:03:51.500020+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    M. B. Green and M. Gutperle,Effects of D instantons,Nucl. Phys. B498(1997) 195–227, [hep-th/9701093]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  2. [2]

    M. B. Green and A. Rudra,Type I/heterotic duality and M-theory amplitudes,JHEP 12(2016) 060, [arXiv:1604.00324]

    work page arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    K. S. Narain,New Heterotic String Theories in Uncompactified Dimensions<10, Phys. Lett. B169(1986) 41–46

    1986

  4. [4]

    K. S. Narain, M. H. Sarmadi, and E. Witten,A Note on Toroidal Compactification of Heterotic String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B279(1987) 369–379

    1987

  5. [5]

    Ferrara, D

    S. Ferrara, D. Lust, A. D. Shapere, and S. Theisen,Modular Invariance in Supersymmetric Field Theories,Phys. Lett. B225(1989) 363

    1989

  6. [6]

    A. Font, L. E. Ibanez, D. Lust, and F. Quevedo,Supersymmetry Breaking From Duality Invariant Gaugino Condensation,Phys. Lett. B245(1990) 401–408

    1990

  7. [7]

    Cvetic, A

    M. Cvetic, A. Font, L. E. Ibanez, D. Lust, and F. Quevedo,Target space duality, supersymmetry breaking and the stability of classical string vacua,Nucl. Phys. B361 (1991) 194–232

    1991

  8. [8]

    Gonzalo, L

    E. Gonzalo, L. E. Ib´ a˜ nez, and A. M. Uranga,Modular symmetries and the swampland conjectures,JHEP05(2019) 105, [arXiv:1812.06520]. – 36 –

    work page arXiv 2019

  9. [9]

    J. M. Leedom, N. Righi, and A. Westphal,Heterotic de Sitter beyond modular symmetry,JHEP02(2023) 209, [arXiv:2212.03876]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    Cribiori and D

    N. Cribiori and D. Lust,A note on modular invariant species scale and potentials, arXiv:2306.08673

    work page arXiv

  11. [11]

    Lopes Cardoso, D

    G. Lopes Cardoso, D. Lust, and T. Mohaupt,Moduli spaces and target space duality symmetries in (0,2) Z(N) orbifold theories with continuous Wilson lines,Nucl. Phys. B 432(1994) 68–108, [hep-th/9405002]

    work page arXiv 1994

  12. [12]

    Lopes Cardoso, G

    G. Lopes Cardoso, G. Curio, and D. Lust,Perturbative couplings and modular forms in N=2 string models with a Wilson line,Nucl. Phys. B491(1997) 147–183, [hep-th/9608154]

    work page arXiv 1997

  13. [13]

    Stieberger,(0,2) heterotic gauge couplings and their M theory origin,Nucl

    S. Stieberger,(0,2) heterotic gauge couplings and their M theory origin,Nucl. Phys. B 541(1999) 109–144, [hep-th/9807124]

    work page arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    H. P. Nilles and S. Stieberger,String unification, universal one loop corrections and strongly coupled heterotic string theory,Nucl. Phys. B499(1997) 3–28, [hep-th/9702110]

    work page arXiv 1997

  15. [15]

    G.-J. Ding, F. Feruglio, and X.-G. Liu,Automorphic Forms and Fermion Masses, JHEP01(2021) 037, [arXiv:2010.07952]

    work page arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    A. Baur, M. Kade, H. P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sanchez, and P. K. S. Vaudrevange,Siegel modular flavor group and CP from string theory,Phys. Lett. B816(2021) 136176, [arXiv:2012.09586]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    H. P. Nilles, S. Ramos-Sanchez, A. Trautner, and P. K. S. Vaudrevange,Orbifolds from Sp(4,Z) and their modular symmetries,Nucl. Phys. B971(2021) 115534, [arXiv:2105.08078]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    G.-J. Ding, F. Feruglio, and X.-G. Liu,CP symmetry and symplectic modular invariance,SciPost Phys.10(2021), no. 6 133, [arXiv:2102.06716]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry,

    G.-J. Ding and S. F. King,Neutrino mass and mixing with modular symmetry,Rept. Prog. Phys.87(2024), no. 8 084201, [arXiv:2311.09282]

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    G.-J. Ding, F. Feruglio, and X.-G. Liu,Universal predictions of Siegel modular invariant theories near the fixed points,JHEP05(2024) 052, [arXiv:2402.14915]

    work page arXiv 2024

  21. [21]

    Funakoshi, J

    S. Funakoshi, J. Kawamura, T. Kobayashi, K. Nasu, and H. Otsuka,Moduli stabilization and light axion by Siegel modular forms,JHEP03(2025) 093, [arXiv:2409.19261]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Jiang, W

    S.-Y. Jiang, W. Zhao, and G.-J. Ding,Sp(4,Z)modular inflation,arXiv:2512.21597

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    L. J. Dixon, V. Kaplunovsky, and J. Louis,Moduli dependence of string loop corrections to gauge coupling constants,Nucl. Phys. B355(1991) 649–688. – 37 –

    1991

  24. [24]

    Mayr and S

    P. Mayr and S. Stieberger,Moduli dependence of one loop gauge couplings in (0,2) compactifications,Phys. Lett. B355(1995) 107–116, [hep-th/9504129]

    work page arXiv 1995

  25. [25]

    Shenker,The Strength of Nonperturbative Effects in String Theory,Random Surfaces and Quantum Gravity(1990) 191–200

    S. Shenker,The Strength of Nonperturbative Effects in String Theory,Random Surfaces and Quantum Gravity(1990) 191–200

    1990

  26. [26]

    Silverstein,Duality, compactification, and e(**-1/lambda) effects in the heterotic string theory,Phys

    E. Silverstein,Duality, compactification, and e(**-1/lambda) effects in the heterotic string theory,Phys. Lett. B396(1997) 91–96, [hep-th/9611195]

    work page arXiv 1997

  27. [27]

    M. K. Gaillard and B. D. Nelson,Kahler stabilized, modular invariant heterotic string models,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A22(2007) 1451–1588, [hep-th/0703227]

    work page arXiv 2007

  28. [28]

    B. L. Kaufman, B. D. Nelson, and M. K. Gaillard,Mirage models confront the LHC: K¨ ahler-stabilized heterotic string theory,Phys. Rev. D88(2013), no. 2 025003, [arXiv:1303.6575]

    work page arXiv 2013

  29. [29]

    ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa, C

    R. ´Alvarez-Garc´ ıa, C. Kneißl, J. M. Leedom, and N. Righi,Open strings and heterotic instantons,Phys. Lett. B872(2026) 140037, [arXiv:2407.20319]

    work page arXiv 2026

  30. [30]

    Righi, “SMFs.”https://github.com/nrighi/smfs.git, 2026

    N. Righi, “SMFs.”https://github.com/nrighi/smfs.git, 2026. Accessed: 2026-04-22

    2026

  31. [31]

    Igusa,On siegel modular forms of genus two,American Journal of Mathematics 84(1962), no

    J.-I. Igusa,On siegel modular forms of genus two,American Journal of Mathematics 84(1962), no. 1 175–200

    1962

  32. [32]

    On Gauge couplings in string theory,

    V. Kaplunovsky and J. Louis,On Gauge couplings in string theory,Nucl. Phys. B444 (1995) 191–244, [hep-th/9502077]

    work page arXiv 1995

  33. [33]

    V. S. Kaplunovsky,One Loop Threshold Effects in String Unification,Nucl. Phys. B 307(1988) 145–156, [hep-th/9205068]. [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 382, 436–438 (1992)]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1988

  34. [34]

    Antoniadis, K

    I. Antoniadis, K. S. Narain, and T. R. Taylor,Higher genus string corrections to gauge couplings,Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 37–45

    1991

  35. [35]

    Antoniadis, E

    I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, and K. S. Narain,Moduli corrections to gravitational couplings from string loops,Phys. Lett. B283(1992) 209–212, [hep-th/9203071]

    work page arXiv 1992

  36. [36]

    Antoniadis, E

    I. Antoniadis, E. Gava, and K. S. Narain,Moduli corrections to gauge and gravitational couplings in four-dimensional superstrings,Nucl. Phys. B383(1992) 93–109, [hep-th/9204030]

    work page arXiv 1992

  37. [37]

    J. A. Harvey and G. W. Moore,Algebras, BPS states, and strings,Nucl. Phys. B463 (1996) 315–368, [hep-th/9510182]

    work page arXiv 1996

  38. [38]

    Lopes Cardoso, D

    G. Lopes Cardoso, D. Lust, and T. Mohaupt,Threshold corrections and symmetry enhancement in string compactifications,Nucl. Phys. B450(1995) 115–173, [hep-th/9412209]

    work page arXiv 1995

  39. [39]

    Binetruy and E

    P. Binetruy and E. Dudas,Gaugino condensation and the anomalous U(1),Phys. Lett. B389(1996) 503–509, [hep-th/9607172]. – 38 –

    work page arXiv 1996

  40. [40]

    de Carlos, J

    B. de Carlos, J. A. Casas, and C. Munoz,Supersymmetry breaking and determination of the unification gauge coupling constant in string theories,Nucl. Phys. B399(1993) 623–653, [hep-th/9204012]

    work page arXiv 1993

  41. [41]

    Kawai,N=2 heterotic string threshold correction, K3 surface and generalized Kac-Moody superalgebra,Phys

    T. Kawai,N=2 heterotic string threshold correction, K3 surface and generalized Kac-Moody superalgebra,Phys. Lett. B372(1996) 59–64, [hep-th/9512046]

    work page arXiv 1996

  42. [42]

    C. D. D. Neumann,The Elliptic genus of Calabi-Yau 3-folds and 4-folds: Product formulae and generalized Kac-Moody algebras,J. Geom. Phys.29(1999) 5–12, [hep-th/9607029]

    work page arXiv 1999

  43. [43]

    V. A. Gritsenko and V. V. Nikulin,Siegel automorphic form corrections of some lorentzian kac–moody lie algebras,arXiv preprint alg-geom/9504006(1995)

    work page arXiv 1995

  44. [44]

    R. E. Borcherds,Automorphic forms ono s+ 2, 2 (r) and infinite products,Inventiones mathematicae120(1995), no. 1 161–213

    1995

  45. [45]

    Rademacher and H

    H. Rademacher and H. S. Zuckerman,On the fourier coefficients of certain modular forms of positive dimension,Annals of Mathematics39(1938), no. 2 433–462

    1938

  46. [46]

    Lehner,Discontinuous Groups and Automorphic Functions,

    J. Lehner,Discontinuous Groups and Automorphic Functions,

  47. [47]

    Klingen,Introductory Lectures on Siegel Modular Forms

    H. Klingen,Introductory Lectures on Siegel Modular Forms. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1990

    1990

  48. [48]

    Freitag,Siegelsche modulfunktionen, vol

    E. Freitag,Siegelsche modulfunktionen, vol. 254. Springer-Verlag, 2013

    2013

  49. [49]

    W. L. Baily,Satake’s compactification of vn,American Journal of Mathematics80 (1958), no. 2 348–364

    1958

  50. [50]

    Andreotti and H

    A. Andreotti and H. Grauert,Algebraische K¨ orper von automorphen Funktionen, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. G¨ ott., II. Math.-Phys. Kl.1961(1961) 39–48

    1961

  51. [51]

    Christian, ¨Uber Hilbert-Siegelsche Modulformen und Poincar´ esche Reihen, Mathematische Annalen148(Aug, 1962) 257–307

    U. Christian, ¨Uber Hilbert-Siegelsche Modulformen und Poincar´ esche Reihen, Mathematische Annalen148(Aug, 1962) 257–307

    1962

  52. [52]

    Maass,Die Multiplikatorsysteme zur Siegelschen Modulgruppe

    H. Maass,Die Multiplikatorsysteme zur Siegelschen Modulgruppe. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1964

    1964

  53. [53]

    Freitag and A

    E. Freitag and A. Hauffe-Waschb¨ usch,Multiplier systems for siegel modular groups, International Journal of Number Theory20(2024), no. 05 1383–1398

    2024

  54. [54]

    Gottschling, ¨Uber die Fixpunkte der Siegelschen Modulgruppe,Mathematische Annalen143(1961) 111–149

    E. Gottschling, ¨Uber die Fixpunkte der Siegelschen Modulgruppe,Mathematische Annalen143(1961) 111–149

    1961

  55. [55]

    Gottschling, ¨Uber die fixpunktuntergruppen der siegelschen modulgruppe, Mathematische Annalen143(1961) 399–430

    E. Gottschling, ¨Uber die fixpunktuntergruppen der siegelschen modulgruppe, Mathematische Annalen143(1961) 399–430

    1961

  56. [56]

    Gottschling,Die Uniformisierbarkeit der Fixpunkte eigentlich diskontinuierlicher Gruppen von biholomorphen Abbildungen,Mathematische Annalen169(1967) 26–54

    E. Gottschling,Die Uniformisierbarkeit der Fixpunkte eigentlich diskontinuierlicher Gruppen von biholomorphen Abbildungen,Mathematische Annalen169(1967) 26–54. – 39 –

    1967

  57. [57]

    Bashmakov, M

    V. Bashmakov, M. Del Zotto, A. Hasan, and J. Kaidi,Non-invertible symmetries of class S theories,JHEP05(2023) 225, [arXiv:2211.05138]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    Klemm, M

    A. Klemm, M. Poretschkin, T. Schimannek, and M. Westerholt-Raum,Direct Integration for Mirror Curves of Genus Two and an Almost Meromorphic Siegel Modular Form,arXiv:1502.00557

    work page arXiv

  59. [59]

    Eichler and D

    M. Eichler and D. Zagier,The Theory of Jacobi Forms. Birkhauser, Boston, Massachusetts, 1985

    1985

  60. [60]

    Pari/GP Scripts for Holomorphic Degree 2 Siegel Modular Forms

    A. Kidambi, “Pari/GP Scripts for Holomorphic Degree 2 Siegel Modular Forms.” https://abhirammk.github.io/projects/smfqseries/, 2023. Accessed: 2026-04-22

    2023

  61. [61]

    Cvetiˇ c and M

    M. Cvetiˇ c and M. Wiesner,Nonperturbative resolution of strong coupling singularities in 4D N=1 heterotic M-theory,Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 10 106008, [arXiv:2408.12458]

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    P. P. Novichkov, J. T. Penedo, and S. T. Petcov,Modular flavour symmetries and modulus stabilisation,JHEP03(2022) 149, [arXiv:2201.02020]

    work page arXiv 2022

  63. [63]

    Heim and A

    B. Heim and A. Murase,Symmetries for siegel theta functions, borcherds lifts and automorphic green functions,Journal of Number Theory133(2013), no. 10 3485–3499

    2013

  64. [64]

    Kidambi,Behaviour of singular moduli of abelian varieties and automorphic functions under base change and degeneration limits (Work in Progress),

    A. Kidambi,Behaviour of singular moduli of abelian varieties and automorphic functions under base change and degeneration limits (Work in Progress),

  65. [65]

    J. H. Bruinier, G. van der Geer, H. Gunter, and D. Zagier,The 1-2-3 of Modular Forms. Springer, Berlin, 2008

    2008

  66. [66]

    Kaneko and D

    M. Kaneko and D. Zagier,A generalized jacobi theta function and quasimodular forms, inThe Moduli Space of Curves(R. H. Dijkgraaf, C. F. Faber, and G. B. M. van der Geer, eds.), (Boston, MA), pp. 165–172, Birkh¨ auser Boston, 1995

    1995

  67. [67]

    ichi Igusa,Modular forms and projective invariants,American Journal of Mathematics89(1967), no

    J. ichi Igusa,Modular forms and projective invariants,American Journal of Mathematics89(1967), no. 3 817–855

    1967

  68. [68]

    V. A. Gritsenko and V. V. Nikulin,Automorphic forms and lorentzian kac–moody algebras part ii,International Journal of Mathematics9(1998), no. 02 201–275. – 40 –

    1998