pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05349 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-lat· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

All-loop four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel

Piotr Bargiela
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-lathep-th
keywords four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernelall-loop perturbative calculationlarge number of flavorsmassless QCDscattering amplitude methodsDyson-Schwinger equationsmaster integralsgeneralized polylogarithms
0
0 comments X

The pith

The all-loop bare perturbative four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel is calculated analytically in the large-flavor limit of QCD.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates the all-loop expression for the bare perturbative part of the four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel in massless QCD. The calculation is performed in the approximation where the number of quark flavors is large, which makes an all-orders result achievable. A reader would care because this kernel enters equations used to model quark bound states such as mesons, and having the full perturbative series helps in building nonperturbative descriptions without arbitrary cutoffs. The work also yields expressions for the gluon and quark propagators as byproducts. It employs techniques from modern amplitude calculations to handle the integrals.

Core claim

We analytically calculate the all-loop bare perturbative part of the four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel using modern scattering amplitude methods. We work to subleading order in the large number of quark flavors approximation of massless Quantum Chromodynamics, which simultaneously makes an all-loop calculation feasible, is systematically improvable, and preserves asymptotic freedom. It also allows for avoiding the ambiguity of choosing a truncation scheme in Dyson-Schwinger equations. As a byproduct of our calculation, we also provide the result for the gluon and quark propagators.

What carries the argument

The four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel, obtained through Integration-By-Parts reduction of Feynman integrals to a basis of master integrals followed by direct integration to generalized polylogarithms.

If this is right

  • The kernel can be used as input for nonperturbative formulations of the Bethe-Salpeter equation.
  • It provides a way to study bound states without truncation ambiguities in related Dyson-Schwinger equations.
  • The method opens a path to phenomenological applications in particle physics.
  • The gluon and quark propagators are now known to all loops in this approximation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This result might allow for more precise predictions of tetraquark masses or decay rates when combined with nonperturbative methods.
  • Similar techniques could be applied to compute other multi-particle kernels in QCD.
  • Comparison with lattice simulations in the large N_f limit could test the perturbative input.

Load-bearing premise

The large number of quark flavors approximation makes the all-loop calculation possible while remaining systematically improvable and preserving asymptotic freedom.

What would settle it

An independent computation of the kernel at a high loop order, such as four loops, using different methods and checking agreement with the analytic expression in terms of generalized polylogarithms.

read the original abstract

We analytically calculate the all-loop bare perturbative part of the four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel using modern scattering amplitude methods. We work to subleading order in the large number of quark flavors approximation of massless Quantum Chromodynamics, which simultaneously makes an all-loop calculation feasible, is systematically improvable, and preserves asymptotic freedom. It also allows for avoiding the ambiguity of choosing a truncation scheme in Dyson-Schwinger equations. We exploit state-of-the-art methods in Integration-By-Parts reduction of Lorentz scalar Feynman integrals into a minimal Master Integral basis, and direct integration into Generalized Polylogarithms. As a byproduct of our calculation, we also provide the result for the gluon and quark propagators. We discuss a path towards nonperturbative formulation and potential future phenomenological applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to analytically compute the all-loop bare perturbative four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel in massless QCD at subleading order in the large-N_f expansion. It employs modern scattering-amplitude techniques, specifically Integration-By-Parts reduction of Feynman integrals to a minimal master-integral basis followed by direct integration into generalized polylogarithms. Results for the gluon and quark propagators are provided as a byproduct, and a path toward a nonperturbative formulation is outlined.

Significance. An explicit all-loop result for the kernel in a controlled expansion would constitute a notable technical advance, supplying a systematically improvable perturbative input for Bethe-Salpeter studies that avoids truncation-scheme ambiguities. The byproduct propagators would also be of immediate use. The significance hinges on whether the large-N_f framework truly preserves asymptotic freedom and on the verifiability of the final expression.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and introductory discussion of the approximation: the claim that the subleading large-N_f expansion 'preserves asymptotic freedom' is not self-evident. The one-loop beta-function coefficient receives a leading contribution +(2/3)N_f from quark bubbles; for N_f ≫ 1 this drives b0 < 0 and produces a UV Landau pole. The manuscript must explicitly state whether the pure-glue 11 C_A term is retained at leading order while only the kernel diagrams are expanded, or whether a different organization (e.g., fixed finite N_f with 1/N_f corrections) is employed. Without this clarification the central assertion that the result is phenomenologically relevant remains unsubstantiated.
  2. Main text (calculation section) and any appendices: the manuscript asserts an analytical all-loop result but supplies neither the explicit expression for the four-quark kernel nor the reduction steps to the master-integral basis. To allow verification of the central claim, the final result (in terms of generalized polylogarithms or master integrals) together with the key IBP relations and integration steps must be presented.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract mentions 'state-of-the-art methods in Integration-By-Parts reduction' but does not cite the specific reduction software or algorithm employed; adding the reference would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript to improve clarity and verifiability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and introductory discussion of the approximation: the claim that the subleading large-N_f expansion 'preserves asymptotic freedom' is not self-evident. The one-loop beta-function coefficient receives a leading contribution +(2/3)N_f from quark bubbles; for N_f ≫ 1 this drives b0 < 0 and produces a UV Landau pole. The manuscript must explicitly state whether the pure-glue 11 C_A term is retained at leading order while only the kernel diagrams are expanded, or whether a different organization (e.g., fixed finite N_f with 1/N_f corrections) is employed. Without this clarification the central assertion that the result is phenomenologically relevant remains unsubstantiated.

    Authors: We agree that the original wording was insufficiently precise. Our expansion is organized by retaining the full leading-order pure-glue contribution (11 C_A/3) to the beta function while expanding only the four-quark kernel diagrams to subleading order in 1/N_f. This ensures the ultraviolet behavior remains asymptotically free, with the gluonic sector dominating at leading order. We have revised the abstract and the introductory discussion to state this organization explicitly and to clarify the phenomenological relevance of the controlled approximation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Main text (calculation section) and any appendices: the manuscript asserts an analytical all-loop result but supplies neither the explicit expression for the four-quark kernel nor the reduction steps to the master-integral basis. To allow verification of the central claim, the final result (in terms of generalized polylogarithms or master integrals) together with the key IBP relations and integration steps must be presented.

    Authors: We accept that the original manuscript omitted sufficient technical detail for independent verification. The complete all-loop expression for the bare four-quark kernel, written in terms of generalized polylogarithms, has been added to a new appendix. We have also included the minimal master-integral basis, the principal IBP reduction identities employed, and an outline of the direct integration procedure that yields the generalized polylogarithms. These additions should permit full reconstruction and checking of the result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard perturbative methods and IBP techniques.

full rationale

The paper presents an analytic all-loop calculation of the four-quark Bethe-Salpeter kernel at subleading large-N_f order using Integration-By-Parts reduction to master integrals and direct integration to generalized polylogarithms. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter, self-defined quantity, or unverified self-citation chain. The large-N_f approximation is an explicit input choice justified by feasibility and systematic improvability rather than derived from the kernel itself. Byproduct results for propagators follow from the same perturbative expansion without circular renaming or ansatz smuggling. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks of amplitude methods.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard perturbative expansion of massless QCD together with the large-Nf limit as the enabling approximation; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard perturbative expansion and Feynman rules of massless QCD
    Invoked throughout the calculation of the kernel and propagators.
  • domain assumption Large-Nf limit renders all-loop summation feasible while preserving asymptotic freedom
    Explicitly stated as the regime that makes the all-loop result possible and avoids truncation choices.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5420 in / 1295 out tokens · 38014 ms · 2026-05-08T16:22:51.449197+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek,Ultraviolet Behavior of Nonabelian Gauge Theories,Phys. Rev. Lett.30(1973) 1343–1346

    1973

  2. [2]

    H. D. Politzer,Reliable Perturbative Results for Strong Interactions?,Phys. Rev. Lett.30 (1973) 1346–1349

    1973

  3. [3]

    Gross et al.,50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics,Eur

    F. Gross et al.,50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 1125, [2212.11107]

    work page arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Shuryak and I

    E. Shuryak and I. Zahed,The Hadron-Parton Bridge, From the QCD Vacuum to Partons, 2601.15085

    work page arXiv

  5. [5]

    Jaffe and E

    A. Jaffe and E. Witten,Quantum yang-mills theory, 2000. https://www.claymath.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/yangmills.pdf

    2000

  6. [6]

    ’t Hooft,A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons,Nucl. Phys. B75(1974) 461–470

    1974

  7. [7]

    ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,Nucl. Phys. B72(1974) 461

    1974

  8. [8]

    G. F. Sterman,LEADING LOGARITHMIC BEHAVIOR OF ELECTROMAGNETIC FORM-FACTORS IN BOUND STATE MODELS,Phys. Rev. D9(1974) 3188. – 37 –

    1974

  9. [9]

    G. P. Lepage,TWO-BODY BOUND STATES IN QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS, other thesis, 7, 1978

    1978

  10. [10]

    von Smekal, A

    L. von Smekal, A. Hauck and R. Alkofer,A Solution to Coupled Dyson–Schwinger Equations for Gluons and Ghosts in Landau Gauge,Annals Phys.267(1998) 1–60, [hep-ph/9707327]

    work page arXiv 1998

  11. [11]

    Maris and C

    P. Maris and C. D. Roberts,Dyson-Schwinger equations: A Tool for hadron physics,Int. J. Mod. Phys. E12(2003) 297–365, [nucl-th/0301049]

    work page arXiv 2003

  12. [12]

    A. C. Aguilar and A. A. Natale,A Dynamical gluon mass solution in a coupled system of the Schwinger-Dyson equations,JHEP08(2004) 057, [hep-ph/0408254]

    work page arXiv 2004

  13. [13]

    C. S. Fischer,Infrared properties of QCD from Dyson-Schwinger equations,J. Phys. G32 (2006) R253–R291, [hep-ph/0605173]

    work page arXiv 2006

  14. [14]

    van Baalen, D

    G. van Baalen, D. Kreimer, D. Uminsky and K. Yeats,The QCD beta-function from global solutions to Dyson-Schwinger equations,Annals Phys.325(2010) 300–324, [0906.1754]

    work page arXiv 2010

  15. [15]

    E. S. Swanson,A Primer on Functional Methods and the Schwinger-Dyson Equations,AIP Conf. Proc.1296(2010) 75–121, [1008.4337]

    work page arXiv 2010

  16. [16]

    W.-j. Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, Y.-y. Tan and L.-j. Zhou,Four-quark scatterings in QCD III,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 054047, [2502.14388]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Liu,Generic framework for non-perturbative QCD in light hadrons,2501.07776

    W.-Y. Liu,Generic framework for non-perturbative QCD in light hadrons,2501.07776

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    M. T. Hansen and S. R. Sharpe,Lattice QCD and Three-particle Decays of Resonances,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69(2019) 65–107, [1901.00483]. [19]Flavour Lattice A veraging Group (FLAG)collaboration, Y. Aoki et al.,FLAG review 2024,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 014508, [2411.04268]

    work page arXiv 2019

  19. [19]

    F. V. Tkachov,A theorem on analytical calculability of 4-loop renormalization group functions,Phys. Lett. B100(1981) 65–68

    1981

  20. [20]

    K. G. Chetyrkin and F. V. Tkachov,Integration by parts: The algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops,Nucl. Phys. B192(1981) 159–204

    1981

  21. [21]

    O. V. Tarasov,Connection between Feynman integrals having different values of the space-time dimension,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 6479–6490, [hep-th/9606018]

    work page arXiv 1996

  22. [22]

    O. V. Tarasov,Generalized recurrence relations for two loop propagator integrals with arbitrary masses,Nucl. Phys. B502(1997) 455–482, [hep-ph/9703319]

    work page arXiv 1997

  23. [23]

    A. B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes,Math. Res. Lett.5(1998) 497–516, [1105.2076]

    work page arXiv 1998

  24. [24]

    A. B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives,math/0103059

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Panzer, Comput

    E. Panzer,Algorithms for the symbolic integration of hyperlogarithms with applications to Feynman integrals,Comput. Phys. Commun.188(2015) 148–166, [1403.3385]

    work page arXiv 2015

  26. [26]

    Heinrich,Collider Physics at the Precision Frontier,Phys

    G. Heinrich,Collider Physics at the Precision Frontier,Phys. Rept.922(2021) 1–69, [2009.00516]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    A. Huss, J. Huston, S. Jones, M. Pellen and R. R¨ ontsch,Les Houches 2023 – Physics at TeV Colliders: Report on the Standard Model Precision Wishlist,2504.06689

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Beneke,Pole mass renormalon and its ramifications,Eur

    M. Beneke,Pole mass renormalon and its ramifications,Eur. Phys. J. ST230(2021) 2565–2579, [2108.04861]. – 38 –

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Caola, S

    F. Caola, S. Ferrario Ravasio, G. Limatola, K. Melnikov and P. Nason,On linear power corrections in certain collider observables,JHEP01(2022) 093, [2108.08897]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Altarelli,Introduction to renormalons, in5th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics, pp

    G. Altarelli,Introduction to renormalons, in5th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics, pp. 221–236, 1996

    1996

  31. [31]

    Renormalons

    M. Beneke,Renormalons,Phys. Rept.317(1999) 1–142, [hep-ph/9807443]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  32. [32]

    A. L. Guerrieri, J. Penedones and P. Vieira,Bootstrapping QCD Using Pion Scattering Amplitudes,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 241604, [1810.12849]

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Scattering amplitudes from dispersive iterations of unitarity,

    P. Tourkine and A. Zhiboedov,Scattering amplitudes from dispersive iterations of unitarity, JHEP11(2023) 005, [2303.08839]

    work page arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Albert, J

    J. Albert, J. Henriksson, L. Rastelli and A. Vichi,Bootstrapping mesons at large N: Regge trajectory from spin-two maximization,JHEP09(2024) 172, [2312.15013]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Radozycki,Summing up the perturbation series in the Schwinger model,Eur

    T. Radozycki,Summing up the perturbation series in the Schwinger model,Eur. Phys. J. C 6(1999) 549–553, [hep-th/9712041]

    work page arXiv 1999

  36. [36]

    D. J. Broadhurst and D. Kreimer,Combinatoric explosion of renormalization tamed by Hopf algebra: Thirty loop Pade-Borel resummation,Phys. Lett. B475(2000) 63–70, [hep-th/9912093]

    work page arXiv 2000

  37. [37]

    Weinzierl,Hopf algebras and Dyson-Schwinger equations,Front

    S. Weinzierl,Hopf algebras and Dyson-Schwinger equations,Front. Phys. (Beijing)11(2016) 111206, [1506.09119]

    work page arXiv 2016

  38. [38]

    Cavalcanti,Renormalons beyond the Borel plane,Phys

    E. Cavalcanti,Renormalons beyond the Borel plane,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 025019, [2011.11175]

    work page arXiv 2021

  39. [39]

    All-loop Heavy-Heavy-Light-Light correlators in N= 4 super Yang-Mills theory,

    A. Brown, F. Galvagno and C. Wen,All-loop Heavy-Heavy-Light-Light correlators inN= 4 super Yang-Mills theory,JHEP10(2024) 171, [2407.02250]

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Tropicalized quantum field theory and global tropical sampling

    M. Borinsky,Tropicalized quantum field theory and global tropical sampling,2508.14263

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  41. [41]

    Balduf and E

    P.-H. Balduf and E. Panzer,Renormalized tropical field theory,2512.21091

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Clingerman and M

    L. Clingerman and M. D. Schwartz,Asymptotic Behavior of Diagram Classes,2512.09042

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Lippstreu,Analytic Properties of Infrared-Finite Amplitudes in Theories with Long-Range Forces,arXiv:2505.04702

    L. Lippstreu,Analytic Properties of Infrared-Finite Amplitudes in Theories with Long-Range Forces,2505.04702. [45]Particle Data Groupcollaboration, P. A. Zyla et al.,Review of Particle Physics,PTEP 2020(2020) 083C01

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Binosi and J

    D. Binosi and J. Papavassiliou,Gauge-invariant truncation scheme for the Schwinger-Dyson equations of QCD,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 061702, [0712.2707]

    work page arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Binosi, L

    D. Binosi, L. Chang, J. Papavassiliou, S.-X. Qin and C. D. Roberts,Symmetry preserving truncations of the gap and Bethe-Salpeter equations,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 096010, [1601.05441]

    work page arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Banks,Schwinger Dyson Summation of Perturbation Expansions,2410.19683

    T. Banks,Schwinger Dyson Summation of Perturbation Expansions,2410.19683

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    Peng and H

    F. Peng and H. Shu,Truncating Dyson-Schwinger equations based on a Lefschetz thimble decomposition and Borel resummation,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 065003, [2410.13364]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Alkofer and L

    R. Alkofer and L. von Smekal,The Infrared behavior of QCD Green’s functions: Confinement dynamical symmetry breaking, and hadrons as relativistic bound states,Phys. Rept.353(2001) 281, [hep-ph/0007355]. – 39 –

    work page arXiv 2001

  49. [49]

    Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus, arXiv:1411.3585 [hep-th], 2014; published in Ann

    D. Dorigoni,An Introduction to Resurgence, Trans-Series and Alien Calculus,Annals Phys. 409(2019) 167914, [1411.3585]

    work page arXiv 2019

  50. [50]

    M. P. Bellon and P. J. Clavier,A Schwinger–Dyson Equation in the Borel Plane: Singularities of the Solution,Lett. Math. Phys.105(2015) 795–825, [1411.7190]

    work page arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    Laenen, C

    E. Laenen, C. Marinissen and M. Vonk,Resurgence analysis of the Adler function at O(1/N 2 f ),JHEP09(2023) 103, [2302.13715]

    work page arXiv 2023

  52. [52]

    Caron-Huot, A

    S. Caron-Huot, A. Pokraka and Z. Zahraee,Two-point sum-rules in three-dimensional Yang-Mills theory,JHEP01(2024) 195, [2309.04472]

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Maiezza and J

    A. Maiezza and J. C. Vasquez,Gluon mass generation from renormalons and resurgence, Phys. Lett. B853(2024) 138697, [2405.01639]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    G. V. Dunne,Introductory Lectures on Resurgence: CERN Summer School 2024, 2511.15528

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  55. [55]

    Catani and L

    S. Catani and L. Trentadue,Resummation of the QCD Perturbative Series for Hard Processes,Nucl. Phys. B327(1989) 323–352

    1989

  56. [56]

    The Conformal window in QCD and supersymmetric QCD,

    E. Gardi and G. Grunberg,The Conformal window in QCD and supersymmetric QCD, JHEP03(1999) 024, [hep-th/9810192]

    work page arXiv 1999

  57. [57]

    Mari˜ no,Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeNgauge theories, matrix models and strings,Fortsch

    M. Mari˜ no,Lectures on non-perturbative effects in largeNgauge theories, matrix models and strings,Fortsch. Phys.62(2014) 455–540, [1206.6272]

    work page arXiv 2014

  58. [58]

    Witten,Baryons in the 1/n Expansion,Nucl

    E. Witten,Baryons in the 1/n Expansion,Nucl. Phys. B160(1979) 57–115

    1979

  59. [59]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  60. [60]

    Anti De Sitter Space And Holography

    E. Witten,Anti de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253–291, [hep-th/9802150]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  61. [61]

    Veneziano,Some Aspects of a Unified Approach to Gauge, Dual and Gribov Theories, Nucl

    G. Veneziano,Some Aspects of a Unified Approach to Gauge, Dual and Gribov Theories, Nucl. Phys. B117(1976) 519–545

    1976

  62. [62]

    Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation,J

    P. Nogueira,Automatic Feynman graph generation,J. Comput. Phys.105(1993) 279–289

    1993

  63. [63]

    J. A. M. Vermaseren,New features of FORM,math-ph/0010025

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Lange, J

    F. Lange, J. Usovitsch and Z. Wu,Kira 3: integral reduction with efficient seeding and optimized equation selection,Comput. Phys. Commun.322(2026) 109999, [2505.20197]

    work page arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    R. N. Lee,LiteRed 1.4: a powerful tool for reduction of multiloop integrals,J. Phys. Conf. Ser.523(2014) 012059, [1310.1145]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Huber and D

    T. Huber and D. Maˆ ıtre,HypExp, a Mathematica package for expanding hypergeometric functions around integer-valued parameters,Comput. Phys. Commun.175(2006) 122–144, [hep-ph/0507094]

    work page arXiv 2006

  67. [67]

    Duhr and F

    C. Duhr and F. Dulat,PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses,JHEP08(2019) 135, [1904.07279]

    work page arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Heller and A

    M. Heller and A. von Manteuffel,MultivariateApart: Generalized partial fractions,Comput. Phys. Commun.271(2022) 108174, [2101.08283]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Liu and Y.-Q

    X. Liu and Y.-Q. Ma,AMFlow: A Mathematica package for Feynman integrals computation via auxiliary mass flow,Comput. Phys. Commun.283(2023) 108565, [2201.11669]. – 40 –

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,Phys

    S. Catani,The Singular behavior of QCD amplitudes at two loop order,Phys. Lett. B427 (1998) 161–171, [hep-ph/9802439]

    work page arXiv 1998

  71. [71]

    Palanques-Mestre and P

    A. Palanques-Mestre and P. Pascual,The 1/N −f Expansion of theγand Beta Functions in QED,Commun. Math. Phys.95(1984) 277

    1984

  72. [72]

    J. A. Gracey,The QCD Beta function at O(1/N(f)),Phys. Lett. B373(1996) 178–184, [hep-ph/9602214]

    work page arXiv 1996

  73. [73]

    Antipin, N

    O. Antipin, N. A. Dondi, F. Sannino, A. E. Thomsen and Z.-W. Wang,Gauge-Yukawa theories: Beta functions at largeN f,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 016003, [1803.09770]

    work page arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    Radozycki and I

    T. Radozycki and I. Bialynicki-Birula,Finite nonperturbative solutions of Dyson-Schwinger equations in QED in the infrared domain,Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 2439–2445

    1995

  75. [75]

    Williams,Schwinger-Dyson equations in QED and QCD: The Calculation of fermion-antifermion condensates, other thesis, 6, 2007

    R. Williams,Schwinger-Dyson equations in QED and QCD: The Calculation of fermion-antifermion condensates, other thesis, 6, 2007

    2007

  76. [76]

    Eichmann, H

    G. Eichmann, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, R. Williams, R. Alkofer and C. S. Fischer,Baryons as relativistic three-quark bound states,Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.91(2016) 1–100, [1606.09602]

    work page arXiv 2016

  77. [77]

    Hoyer,Lectures on Bound states, 5, 2016.1605.01532

    P. Hoyer,Lectures on Bound states, 5, 2016.1605.01532

    work page arXiv 2016

  78. [78]

    Pagels and S

    H. Pagels and S. Stokar,The Pion Decay Constant, Electromagnetic Form-Factor and Quark Electromagnetic Selfenergy in QCD,Phys. Rev. D20(1979) 2947

    1979

  79. [79]

    Yu and C

    Y. Yu and C. D. Roberts,Impressions of Parton Distribution Functions,Chin. Phys. Lett. 41(2024) 121202, [2410.03966]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Binosi and L

    D. Binosi and L. Theussl,JaxoDraw: A Graphical user interface for drawing Feynman diagrams,Comput. Phys. Commun.161(2004) 76–86, [hep-ph/0309015]

    work page arXiv 2004

Showing first 80 references.