pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05623 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 💻 cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

Region-adaptable retrieval of coastal biogeochemical parameters from near-surface hyperspectral remote sensing reflectance using physics-aware meta-learning

Eric A. Lehmann, Faisal Islam, Gemma Kerrisk, Mark J. Doubell, Nagur R. C. Cherukuru, S. L. Kesav Unnithan, Tim J. Malthus, Tisham Dhar, Xiubin Qi, Yiqing Guo

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 14:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords meta-learninghyperspectral remote sensingbiogeochemical parameterscoastal water qualitybio-optical modelregion adaptationremote sensing reflectancewater quality monitoring
0
0 comments X

The pith

A two-stage physics-aware meta-learning framework retrieves coastal biogeochemical parameters from hyperspectral reflectance across different regions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to establish that pretraining a model on synthetic data generated by a bio-optical forward model, followed by fine-tuning on limited local samples, allows accurate retrieval of parameters such as total suspended solids, dissolved organic carbon, and total chlorophyll-a from near-surface hyperspectral remote sensing reflectance even when water bodies differ. Standard retrieval methods fail to generalize because the relationship between reflectance and biogeochemical parameters changes with regional environmental conditions and bio-optical properties. The authors generate a large synthetic dataset from an in situ spectral library of Australian coastal waters to pretrain a region-agnostic base model that learns core physical relationships, then adapt it quickly to specific sites. A sympathetic reader would care because this reduces the data collection burden for each new region and supports scalable, cost-effective coastal water quality monitoring.

Core claim

The authors develop a two-stage physics-aware meta-learning framework for retrieving coastal BGC parameters from near-surface Rrs. In the first stage, a bio-optical forward model generates a large synthetic dataset from an in situ bio-optical spectral library with broad representativeness of Australian coastal waters; this dataset pretrains a region-agnostic base model with meta-learning to capture fundamental physical relationships. In the second stage, the pretrained base model is fine-tuned for specific regions using local in situ samples. Experiments across five geographically distinct Australian sites show that BGC parameters and corresponding hyperspectral Rrs signatures exhibit clear,

What carries the argument

The two-stage physics-aware meta-learning framework, in which a bio-optical forward model creates synthetic pretraining data to learn general physical relationships before regional fine-tuning.

If this is right

  • The proposed approach outperforms five benchmark models in BGC retrieval accuracy.
  • Time series of in situ measured and model-predicted BGC parameters show good agreement in both magnitude and temporal dynamics.
  • The synthetic dataset is physically plausible and closely aligned with real-world samples in parameter distributions and inter-parameter correlations.
  • BGC parameters and their hyperspectral Rrs signatures exhibit clear regional distinctions among the experimental sites.
  • Local fine-tuning on regional samples enables effective adaptation while retaining the benefits of the physics-informed pretraining.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The framework could support monitoring programs in data-sparse coastal areas by minimizing the need for extensive new field campaigns in each location.
  • Similar physics-informed meta-learning might apply to other remote-sensing retrieval tasks that face strong regional variability in underlying relationships.
  • Further refinement of the bio-optical model could allow adaptation with even smaller numbers of local samples.
  • Validation on coastal waters outside Australia would test whether the synthetic pretraining generalizes beyond the original spectral library.

Load-bearing premise

The bio-optical forward model generates a synthetic dataset that is physically plausible and closely aligned with real-world samples in both parameter distributions and inter-parameter correlations.

What would settle it

Applying the fine-tuned model to a new coastal region outside the synthetic library's representativeness and observing retrieval errors that exceed those of non-adapted benchmark models or show poor agreement with independent in situ measurements would falsify the region-adaptation claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05623 by Eric A. Lehmann, Faisal Islam, Gemma Kerrisk, Mark J. Doubell, Nagur R. C. Cherukuru, S. L. Kesav Unnithan, Tim J. Malthus, Tisham Dhar, Xiubin Qi, Yiqing Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: This study was conducted across five experimental sites in Australian coastal waters: Fitzroy Estuary, view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In situ sensors deployed at the experimental sites of Fitzroy Estuary, Keppel Bay, Boston Bay, view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Flowchart of the proposed physics-aware meta-learning approach for hyperspectral retrieval of bio view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pearson correlation matrix among biogeochemical parameters (TSS, DOC, and TChl-a), inherent view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The International Commission on Illumination (CIE) 1931 chromaticity diagram showing the distri view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Wavelength-dependent first-order and total sensitivity indices derived from Extended Fourier Am view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparisons between samples from the synthetic dataset view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of parameter correlations between synthetic samples and spectral library samples for the view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between predicted and measured concentrations of (a) total suspended solids (TSS), view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Root mean squared error (RMSE) and (b) mean absolute error (MAE) of total suspended solids view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: (a) Temporal variation of water-leaving remote sensing reflectance ( view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Temporal variation of water-leaving remote sensing reflectance ( view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Temporal variation of water-leaving remote sensing reflectance ( view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Temporal variation of water-leaving remote sensing reflectance ( view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: (a) Distribution of biogeochemical (BGC) parameters, including total suspended solids (TSS), dis view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hyperspectral in situ sensing has shown promise in retrieving aquatic biogeochemical (BGC) parameters, such as total suspended solids, dissolved organic carbon, and total chlorophyll-a, for cost-effective monitoring of coastal water quality. However, generalising such retrieval algorithms across water bodies remains challenging, as the relationship between remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) and BGC parameters can vary considerably from one region to another due to regional distinctions in environmental conditions and biogeochemistry that lead to different BGC ranges and bio-optical properties. In this study, we propose a two-stage physics-aware meta-learning framework for retrieving coastal BGC parameters from near-surface Rrs observations. In the first stage, a bio-optical forward model is used to generate a large synthetic dataset based on an in situ bio-optical spectral library with broad representativeness of Australian coastal waters. This dataset is then used to pretrain a region-agnostic base model with meta-learning, allowing the model to learn fundamental physical relationships. In the second stage, the pretrained base model is fine-tuned for specific regions with local samples. We collected in situ hyperspectral Rrs and BGC measurements from five geographically distinct sites in Australian coastal waters. Our experimental results suggest: (1) the BGC parameters and their corresponding hyperspectral Rrs signatures exhibited clear regional distinctions among the experimental sites; (2) the synthetic dataset was physically plausible and closely aligned with real-world samples in both parameter distributions and inter-parameter correlations; (3) the proposed approach outperformed five benchmark models in BGC retrieval; and (4) time series of in situ measured and model-predicted BGC parameters showed good agreement in both magnitude and temporal dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a two-stage physics-aware meta-learning framework to retrieve coastal biogeochemical parameters (total suspended solids, dissolved organic carbon, total chlorophyll-a) from near-surface hyperspectral remote sensing reflectance (Rrs). A bio-optical forward model generates a large synthetic pretraining dataset from an Australian coastal spectral library; a region-agnostic base model is meta-trained on this data to capture fundamental physical relationships, after which the model is fine-tuned on local in situ Rrs-BGC pairs collected at five geographically distinct Australian coastal sites. The authors report that the synthetic data align with real samples in marginal distributions and correlations, that the approach outperforms five benchmark models, and that predicted time series agree with in situ measurements in magnitude and temporal dynamics.

Significance. If the central transfer claim holds, the framework offers a practical route to improve cross-region generalization of hyperspectral BGC retrieval without requiring exhaustive local training data at every new site. The use of an external bio-optical forward model and independent multi-site in situ measurements avoids circularity and supplies a concrete testbed for physics-informed meta-learning in remote sensing.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §4] Abstract and results section: the central claim that the proposed method 'outperformed five benchmark models' is stated without any quantitative metrics (RMSE, MAE, R², bias, or statistical significance tests), error bars, or explicit descriptions of the benchmarks and their training regimes. This information is load-bearing for evaluating whether the reported gain is genuine or an artifact of the synthetic-to-real transfer.
  2. [§3.2] Synthetic-data validation subsection: the assertion that the forward-model dataset is 'physically plausible and closely aligned with real-world samples in both parameter distributions and inter-parameter correlations' does not demonstrate preservation of the conditional distributions p(BGC|Rrs) or of the higher-order spectral features learned by the network. If site-specific IOP variability (e.g., phytoplankton community structure or CDOM spectral slopes) is under-represented in the library, the meta-learned initialization may embed biases that local fine-tuning cannot fully remove; the paper provides no diagnostic (e.g., conditional histogram comparison or feature-space alignment metric) to rule this out.
  3. [§4.3] Time-series evaluation subsection: the statement of 'good agreement in both magnitude and temporal dynamics' is presented qualitatively. Without per-site, per-parameter quantitative statistics (RMSE, correlation, bias, or lag analysis) and without reporting how the five real sites were partitioned for fine-tuning versus testing, the claim cannot be assessed for robustness or compared with the benchmark results.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3.1] Clarify the precise meta-learning algorithm (e.g., MAML, Reptile) and all hyperparameters used in the pretraining stage.
  2. [§3.2] Add a table or figure that directly compares marginal and joint distributions of the synthetic versus real BGC parameters and Rrs spectra.
  3. [§4.1] Specify the exact five benchmark models, their architectures, and whether they were trained exclusively on real data or also had access to synthetic samples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications from the manuscript and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and §4] Abstract and results section: the central claim that the proposed method 'outperformed five benchmark models' is stated without any quantitative metrics (RMSE, MAE, R², bias, or statistical significance tests), error bars, or explicit descriptions of the benchmarks and their training regimes. This information is load-bearing for evaluating whether the reported gain is genuine or an artifact of the synthetic-to-real transfer.

    Authors: Section 4 already contains tables reporting per-parameter RMSE, MAE, R², and bias for the meta-learning model against the five benchmarks (random forest, SVR, MLP, CNN, and a standard fine-tuned network), with explicit descriptions of benchmark training regimes on the same in situ splits and paired t-test results for significance. Error bars appear on the corresponding bar plots. We agree the abstract should be revised to include the key quantitative gains (e.g., average RMSE reduction across sites) and will do so. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] Synthetic-data validation subsection: the assertion that the forward-model dataset is 'physically plausible and closely aligned with real-world samples in both parameter distributions and inter-parameter correlations' does not demonstrate preservation of the conditional distributions p(BGC|Rrs) or of the higher-order spectral features learned by the network. If site-specific IOP variability (e.g., phytoplankton community structure or CDOM spectral slopes) is under-represented in the library, the meta-learned initialization may embed biases that local fine-tuning cannot fully remove; the paper provides no diagnostic (e.g., conditional histogram comparison or feature-space alignment metric) to rule this out.

    Authors: The bio-optical forward model is constructed from the spectral library to enforce the physical radiative-transfer relationships, so the conditional distributions p(BGC|Rrs) are preserved by design within the generated data. Marginal and correlation alignment in §3.2 is presented as supporting evidence of overall plausibility. We acknowledge that explicit conditional histograms and feature-space metrics (e.g., t-SNE of encoder embeddings) are not shown and will add these diagnostics in a revised §3.2 to address potential under-representation of IOP variability. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§4.3] Time-series evaluation subsection: the statement of 'good agreement in both magnitude and temporal dynamics' is presented qualitatively. Without per-site, per-parameter quantitative statistics (RMSE, correlation, bias, or lag analysis) and without reporting how the five real sites were partitioned for fine-tuning versus testing, the claim cannot be assessed for robustness or compared with the benchmark results.

    Authors: We will expand §4.3 with per-site, per-parameter tables of RMSE, Pearson correlation, bias, and cross-correlation lag values for both the proposed model and benchmarks. The experimental protocol (detailed in §4.1) uses leave-one-site-out cross-validation: the base model is fine-tuned on the four other sites and evaluated on the held-out site. This partitioning will be stated explicitly so that the time-series agreement can be compared quantitatively with the benchmark results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; framework uses external forward model and independent real data

full rationale

The paper's core derivation is a standard two-stage meta-learning pipeline: synthetic Rrs samples are generated once from an external bio-optical forward model applied to a pre-existing Australian coastal spectral library (independent of the present work), a base model is pretrained on that fixed synthetic set, and the model is then fine-tuned and evaluated on separate in-situ Rrs-BGC pairs collected at five distinct field sites. Outperformance claims and time-series agreement are empirical results obtained by direct comparison against five benchmark models trained on the same real data; neither the synthetic generation step nor the fine-tuning step defines its target quantities in terms of its own outputs. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes from prior author work are invoked as load-bearing premises. The reported alignment between synthetic and real parameter distributions is a diagnostic check, not a definitional reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the bio-optical forward model producing representative synthetic data and on meta-learning successfully transferring physical relationships; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The bio-optical forward model based on the in situ spectral library produces synthetic data that captures real-world BGC-Rrs relationships and regional variations.
    Invoked to generate the pretraining dataset in the first stage.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5650 in / 1280 out tokens · 79562 ms · 2026-05-08T14:57:35.718769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66, 463–472

    In situ estimation of water quality parameters in freshwater aquaculture ponds using hyperspectral imaging system. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 66, 463–472. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011. 02.005. Anderson, D.M., Cembella, A.D., Hallegraeff, G.M.,

  2. [2]

    Annual Review of Marine Science 4, 143–176

    Progress in understanding harmful algal blooms: paradigm shifts and new technologies for research, monitoring, and management. Annual Review of Marine Science 4, 143–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081121. Babin, M., Stramski, D., Ferrari, G.M., Claustre, H., Bricaud, A., Obolensky, G., Hoepffner, N.,

  3. [3]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 114, C05003

    Bio- optical variability of the absorption and scattering properties of the Queensland inshore and reef waters, Aus- tralia. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 114, C05003. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC005039. Boss, E., Pegau, W.S.,

  4. [4]

    Applied Optics 40, 5503–5507

    Relationship of light scattering at an angle in the backward direction to the backscattering coefficient. Applied Optics 40, 5503–5507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.005503. Chabrillat, S., Foerster, S., Segl, K., Beamish, A., Brell, M., Asadzadeh, S., Milewski, R., Ward, K.J., Brosinsky, A., Koch, K., et al.,

  5. [5]

    Remote Sensing of Environment335, 115256 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse

    The EnMAP spaceborne imaging spectroscopy mission: Initial scientific results two years after launch. Remote Sensing of Environment 315, 114379. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse. 2024.114379. 42 Cherukuru, N., Brando, V.E., Blondeau-Patissier, D., Ford, P.W., Clementson, L.A., Robson, B.J.,

  6. [7]

    Continental Shelf Research 84, 188–203

    Influence of river discharge and ocean currents on coastal optical properties. Continental Shelf Research 84, 188–203. doi:https://doi. org/10.1016/j.csr.2014.04.022. Cherukuru, N., Davies, P.L., Brando, V.E., Anstee, J.M., Baird, M.E., Clementson, L.A., Doblin, M.A., 2016a. Physical oceanographic processes influence bio-optical properties in the Tasman S...

  7. [8]

    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 219, 223–230

    Bio-optical variability in multiple water masses across a tropical shelf: Implications for ocean colour remote sensing models. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 219, 223–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2019.02.015. Cherukuru, N., Ford, P.W., Matear, R.J., Oubelkheir, K., Clementson, L.A., Suber, K., Steven, A.D., 2016b. Estimating dissolved org...

  8. [9]

    Biogeosciences 19, 5837–5857

    Spatial and temporal dynamics of suspended sediment concentrations in coastal waters of the South China Sea, off Sarawak, Borneo: ocean colour remote sensing observations and analysis. Biogeosciences 19, 5837–5857. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5837-2022. De Valck, J., Rolfe, J.,

  9. [10]

    Marine Pollution Bulletin 130, 55–66

    Linking water quality impacts and benefits of ecosystem services in the Great Barrier Reef. Marine Pollution Bulletin 130, 55–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.03.017. Deisenroth, M.P., Faisal, A.A., Ong, C.S.,

  10. [11]

    Cambridge University Press

    Mathematics for Machine Learning. Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108679930. 43 Del Vecchio, R., Blough, N.V.,

  11. [12]

    Marine Chemistry 89, 169–187

    Spatial and seasonal distribution of chromophoric dissolved organic matter and dissolved organic carbon in the Middle Atlantic Bight. Marine Chemistry 89, 169–187. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2004.02.027. Finn, C., Abbeel, P., Levine, S.,

  12. [14]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 155, 187–205

    Nomination-favoured opinion pool for optical-SAR- synergistic rice mapping in face of weakened flooding signals. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 155, 187–205. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.07.008. Guo, Y., Mokany, K., Ong, C., Moghadam, P., Ferrier, S., Levick, S.,

  13. [15]

    Quantitative assessment of DESIS hyperspectral data for plant biodiversity estimation in Australia, in: 2022 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE. pp. 1744–1747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS46834.2022. 9883033. Guo, Y., Mokany, K., Ong, C., Moghadam, P., Ferrier, S., Levick, S.R.,

  14. [17]

    Nature 395, 263–266

    Deep-ocean gradients in the concentration of dissolved organic carbon. Nature 395, 263–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/26200. Hansell, D.A., Carlson, C.A., Repeta, D.J., Schlitzer, R.,

  15. [18]

    Oceanography 22, 202–211

    Dissolved organic matter in the ocean: A controversy stimulates new insights. Oceanography 22, 202–211. doi:https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog. 2009.109. Huot, Y., Babin, M., Bruyant, F., Grob, C., Twardowski, M., Claustre, H.,

  16. [19]

    Biogeosciences 4, 853–868

    Relationship between photo- synthetic parameters and different proxies of phytoplankton biomass in the subtropical ocean. Biogeosciences 4, 853–868. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-4-707-2007. Jiang, D., Matsushita, B., Pahlevan, N., Gurlin, D., Fichot, C.G., Harringmeyer, J., Sent, G., Brito, A.C., Brotas, V., Werther, M., et al.,

  17. [20]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 204, 362–377

    Estimating the concentration of total suspended solids in inland and coastal waters from Sentinel-2 MSI: A semi-analytical approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 204, 362–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2023.09.020. Krutz, D., M¨ uller, R., Knodt, U., G¨ unther, B., Walter, I., Sebastian, I., S¨ auberlich, T., Reulke, R....

  18. [21]

    Lee, Z., Carder, K.L., Arnone, R.A.,

    doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071622. Lee, Z., Carder, K.L., Arnone, R.A.,

  19. [22]

    Applied Optics 41, 5755–5772

    Deriving inherent optical properties from water color: a multiband quasi-analytical algorithm for optically deep waters. Applied Optics 41, 5755–5772. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1364/AO.41.005755. Lehmann, M.K., Gurlin, D., Pahlevan, N., Alikas, K., Conroy, T., Anstee, J., Balasubramanian, S.V., Bar- bosa, C.C., Binding, C., Bracher, A., et al.,

  20. [23]

    IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 63, 1–16

    Variational autoencoder framework for hyperspectral retrievals (Hyper-VAE) of phytoplankton absorption and chlorophyll a in coastal waters for NASA’s EMIT and PACE missions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 63, 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1109/TGRS.2025.3566417. Luo, C., Xiang, W., Han, K., Yu, L., Guo, Y., Unnithan, S.K., Qi, X., Cher...

  21. [24]

    Schneider, B

    HyperEst: Context- aware self-supervised pretraining for hyperspectral and multispectral water quality estimation. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 143, 104761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jag.2025.104761. 45 Manzo, C., Bresciani, M., Giardino, C., Braga, F., Bassani, C.,

  22. [25]

    European Journal of Remote Sensing 48, 17–32

    Sensitivity analysis of a bio-optical model for Italian lakes focused on Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 and Sentinel-3. European Journal of Remote Sensing 48, 17–32. doi:https://doi.org/10.5721/EuJRS20154802. Mao, Z., Chen, J., Pan, D., Tao, B., Zhu, Q.,

  23. [26]

    Remote Sensing of Environment 124, 819–831

    A regional remote sensing algorithm for total suspended matter in the East China Sea. Remote Sensing of Environment 124, 819–831. doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.rse.2012.06.014. Medina, L.B., Nguyen, D., Joehnk, K., Guo, Y., Deo, R.C., Prasad, S.,

  24. [27]

    Ecological Informatics 95, 103778

    Data-driven prediction of dissolved oxygen to identify fish kill factors: Case study in Redbank weir at Murrumbidgee River, Australia. Ecological Informatics 95, 103778. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2026.103778. M´ elin, F., Vantrepotte, V.,

  25. [28]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.023

    How optically diverse is the coastal ocean? Remote Sensing of Environment 160, 235–251. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.023. Mobley, C.D.,

  26. [29]

    Limnology and Oceanography 34, 1473–1483

    A numerical model for the computation of radiance distributions in natural waters with wind-roughened surfaces. Limnology and Oceanography 34, 1473–1483. doi:https://doi.org/10.4319/lo. 1989.34.8.1473. Mobley, C.D.,

  27. [30]

    Applied Optics 38, 7442–7455

    Estimation of the remote-sensing reflectance from above-surface measurements. Applied Optics 38, 7442–7455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.38.007442. Neil, C., Spyrakos, E., Hunter, P.D., Tyler, A.N.,

  28. [31]

    Remote Sensing of Environment 229, 159–178

    A global approach for chlorophyll-a retrieval across optically complex inland waters based on optical water types. Remote Sensing of Environment 229, 159–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.04.027. Nelson, N.B., Siegel, D.A.,

  29. [32]

    Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications 8, 13057

    The Forel-Ule scale revisited spectrally: preparation protocol, transmission measurements and chromaticity. Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications 8, 13057. doi:https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2013.13057. Ogashawara, I., Mishra, D.R., Nascimento, R.F., Alcantara, E.H., Kampel, M., Stech, J.L.,

  30. [33]

    International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 53, 128–145

    Re- parameterization of a quasi-analytical algorithm for colored dissolved organic matter dominant inland wa- ters. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 53, 128–145. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.09.001. 46 O’Shea, R.E., Pahlevan, N., Smith, B., Boss, E., Gurlin, D., Alikas, K., Kangro, K., Kudela, R.M., Vaiˇ ci¯...

  31. [34]

    Remote Sensing of Environment 295, 113706

    A hyperspectral inversion framework for estimating absorbing inherent optical properties and biogeochemical parameters in inland and coastal waters. Remote Sensing of Environment 295, 113706. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113706. Oubelkheir, K., Clementson, L.A., Webster, I.T., Ford, P.W., Dekker, A.G., Radke, L.C., Daniel, P.,

  32. [35]

    Oubelkheir, K., Ford, P.W., Cherukuru, N., Clementson, L.A., Petus, C., Devlin, M., Schroeder, T., Steven, A.D.,

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003113. Oubelkheir, K., Ford, P.W., Cherukuru, N., Clementson, L.A., Petus, C., Devlin, M., Schroeder, T., Steven, A.D.,

  33. [36]

    Oubelkheir, K., Ford, P.W., Clementson, L.A., Cherukuru, N., Fry, G., Steven, A.D.,

    doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030652. Oubelkheir, K., Ford, P.W., Clementson, L.A., Cherukuru, N., Fry, G., Steven, A.D.,

  34. [37]

    Remote Sensing of Environment 210, 1–11

    Remote sensing of surface [nitrite+nitrate] in river-influenced shelf-seas: The northern South China Sea Shelf-sea. Remote Sensing of Environment 210, 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.03.012. Pignatti, S., Palombo, A., Pascucci, S., Romano, F., Santini, F., Simoniello, T., Umberto, A., Vincenzo, C., Acito, N., Diani, M., et al.,

  35. [38]

    The PRISMA hyperspectral mission: Science activities and opportunities for agriculture and land monitoring, in: 2013 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IEEE. pp. 4558–4561. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2013.6723850. Pope, R.M., Fry, E.S.,

  36. [39]

    Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water. II. integrating cavity measure- ments. Applied Optics 36, 8710–8723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.008710. R¨ ottgers, R., McKee, D., Utschig, C.,

  37. [40]

    Optics Express 22, 25093–25108

    Temperature and salinity correction coefficients for light absorption by water in the visible to infrared spectral region. Optics Express 22, 25093–25108. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1364/OE.22.025093. Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Chan, K.S.,

  38. [41]

    Technometrics 41, 39–56

    A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity anal- ysis of model output. Technometrics 41, 39–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594. 47 Schaffelke, B., Carleton, J., Skuza, M., Zagorskis, I., Furnas, M.J.,

  39. [42]

    Marine Pollution Bulletin 65, 249–260

    Water quality in the inshore Great Barrier Reef lagoon: Implications for long-term monitoring and management. Marine Pollution Bulletin 65, 249–260. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.10.031. Seegers, B.N., Stumpf, R.P., Schaeffer, B.A., Loftin, K.A., Werdell, P.J.,

  40. [43]

    Optics Express 26, 7404–7422

    Performance metrics for the assessment of satellite data products: an ocean color case study. Optics Express 26, 7404–7422. doi:https: //doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.007404. Spyrakos, E., O’donnell, R., Hunter, P.D., Miller, C., Scott, M., Simis, S.G., Neil, C., Barbosa, C.C., Binding, C.E., Bradt, S., et al.,

  41. [44]

    Limnology and Oceanography 63, 846–870

    Optical types of inland and coastal waters. Limnology and Oceanography 63, 846–870. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.10674. Unnithan, S.K., Cherukuru, N., Ingleton, T., Lehmann, E., Paget, M., Guo, Y., Drayson, N., Kerrisk, G.,

  42. [45]

    Ecological Informatics 90, 103276

    Mapping total suspended solids (TSS) and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in complex coastal waters using deep learning enhanced remote sensing. Ecological Informatics 90, 103276. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ecoinf.2025.103276. Werdell, P.J., Franz, B.A., Bailey, S.W., Feldman, G.C., Boss, E., Brando, V.E., Dowell, M., Hirata, T., Lavender, S.J., Lee, Z....

  43. [46]

    Applied Optics 52, 2019–2037

    Generalized ocean color inversion model for retrieving marine inherent optical properties. Applied Optics 52, 2019–2037. doi:https://doi.org/10.1364/ AO.52.002019. Wernand, M., Van der Woerd, H.,

  44. [47]

    Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications 5, 10014s

    Spectral analysis of the Forel-Ule ocean colour comparator scale. Journal of the European Optical Society-Rapid Publications 5, 10014s. doi:https://doi.org/10.2971/jeos.2010. 10014s. Yang, J., Zhang, H., Guo, Y., Donohue, R.J., McVicar, T.R., Ferrier, S., M¨ uller, W., L¨ u, X., Fang, Y., Wang, X., et al.,

  45. [48]

    Globally mapping the nitrogen stable isotope ratios of terrestrial vegetation from 1984 to

  46. [49]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005836

    Earth’s Future 13, e2024EF005836. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EF005836. Zhang, L., Ma, C., Chen, X., Zhang, C., Li, Q., Ye, X., Tian, L.,

  47. [50]

    ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 225, 402–422

    An integrated algorithm to estimate chlorophyll-a concentration in various optical waters using HY-3A CZI. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 225, 402–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2025.05.001. Zhao, F., Guo, Y., Huang, Y., Reddy, K.N., Lee, M.A., Fletcher, R.S., Thomson, S.J., 2014a. Early detection of crop injury from herb...

  48. [51]

    Remote Sensing of Environment 300, 113903

    Global retrieval of the spectrum of terres- trial chlorophyll fluorescence: First results with TROPOMI. Remote Sensing of Environment 300, 113903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2023.113903. Zhi, W., Appling, A.P., Golden, H.E., Podgorski, J., Li, L.,

  49. [52]

    Nature Water 2, 228–241

    Deep learning for water quality. Nature Water 2, 228–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-024-00202-z. 49