arxiv: 2605.05754 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.stat-mech

Recognition: no theorem link

Thermodynamic incompleteness in non-Markovian Majorana transport I: Island dynamics and missing transport statistics

Yang Tian

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 21:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.stat-mech

keywords Majorana zero modesnon-Markovian dynamicsthermodynamic incompletenesscotunneling regimememory kernelsCoulomb blockadetransport statisticsisland-state dynamics

0 comments

The pith

Complete knowledge of a floating Majorana island's non-Markovian dynamics does not determine the thermodynamic transport statistics measured in the leads.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that even full information on the time evolution of a Majorana island's state, including all non-Markovian memory effects, fails in general to predict the charge and energy flows recorded separately in each attached lead. This holds for a Coulomb-blockaded island hosting M Majorana zero modes coupled to structured reservoirs. After a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation in the cotunneling regime, the island state fixes the memory kernel for each Majorana bilinear and thereby determines every island observable. The same kernels nevertheless leave open which reservoir channel supplied or absorbed each electron and the associated energy exchange. The authors encode this loss in a thermodynamic completeness criterion that flags which transport observables remain fixed once the island memory kernel is known.

Core claim

In a Coulomb-blockaded island with M Majorana zero modes coupled to structured reservoirs, the complete knowledge of the non-Markovian island-state dynamics does not determine the thermodynamic transport statistics measured in the leads. In the cotunneling regime a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation produces reservoir-assisted transitions generated by Majorana bilinears. Tracing out the reservoirs leaves the island state determining the memory kernel associated with each bilinear, which suffices for all island-state observables. It does not fix which lead or detector channel supplied the electron, absorbed the electron, or carried the energy exchange. The result is stated as a thermodynamic-com

What carries the argument

Memory kernel of each Majorana bilinear after the reservoirs are traced out, which encodes the island dynamics while discarding channel-specific assignments of electrons and energy.

If this is right

Two structured-reservoir Majorana devices can share identical island tomography and relaxation yet differ in lead charge noise.
Heat noise and mixed charge-energy correlations can likewise differ while island dynamics remain the same.
The thermodynamic completeness criterion identifies precisely which transport observables are fixed by the island memory kernel.
The geometry of the projection from reservoir records onto island kernels, together with the topology of the tunnel network, determines the missing information.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Lead-resolved noise spectroscopy may be required even when island-state tomography is complete.
Comparable information loss could occur in other non-Markovian quantum-dot systems whose dynamics are reduced to effective memory kernels.
Simultaneous multi-lead noise measurements paired with island relaxation data would provide a direct experimental test.

Load-bearing premise

The cotunneling regime holds and the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation accurately generates reservoir-assisted transitions from Majorana bilinears without higher-order corrections that alter the memory kernels.

What would settle it

Two devices with identical island-state tomography and relaxation times but different measured lead charge noise, heat noise, or charge-energy correlations would confirm the incompleteness; matching transport statistics in all such pairs would falsify it.

read the original abstract

We show that the complete knowledge of the non-Markovian island-state dynamics of a floating Majorana island does not, in general, determine the thermodynamic transport statistics measured in the leads. We demonstrate this statement in a Coulomb-blockaded island with $M$ Majorana zero modes coupled to structured reservoirs. In the cotunneling regime, a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation gives reservoir-assisted transitions generated by Majorana bilinears. After the reservoirs are traced out, the island state determines the memory kernel associated with each bilinear, and this is enough to predict all island-state observables within the cotunneling approximation. It is not enough to determine which lead or detector channel supplied the electron, absorbed the electron, or carried the corresponding energy exchange. This is a genuine loss of thermodynamic information, not an error in the island equation. We formulate the result as a thermodynamic completeness criterion: an island memory equation determines a transport observable only when that observable is constant over all assignments of reservoir channels that give the same island memory kernel. The criterion gives a measurable prediction. Two structured-reservoir Majorana devices can have identical island-state tomography and relaxation, but different charge noise measured separately in the leads, heat noise, and mixed charge-energy correlations. The geometry of the projection from reservoir records to island kernels and the topology of the network of tunnel contacts identify which transport information is absent from island-state dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims island-state dynamics in floating Majorana islands leave lead-specific transport statistics undetermined via memory kernels, but this rests on an unverified cotunneling approximation.

read the letter

The core point is that full knowledge of the non-Markovian island dynamics does not fix the thermodynamic transport measured in the leads. Different assignments of which lead supplies or absorbs electrons can produce identical memory kernels after tracing out the reservoirs, so island tomography and relaxation rates stay the same while charge noise, heat noise, and cross correlations in the leads differ. They frame this as a thermodynamic completeness criterion: an observable is determined by the island equation only if it is constant across all reservoir channels that yield the same kernel. This is worked out in the cotunneling regime using a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation on Majorana bilinears coupled to structured reservoirs, and it gives a concrete, measurable prediction for devices with multiple tunnel contacts. That criterion and the explicit separation between island observables and lead-specific records look new relative to standard Majorana cotunneling treatments. The argument is internally consistent within the stated approximations and avoids circularity by deriving the loss directly from the kernel structure. The main soft spot is the reliance on the cotunneling limit and the Schrieffer-Wolff step. Higher-order tunnel corrections could in principle add lead-dependent pieces to the effective dynamics and restore the missing information, and the abstract gives no estimate of their size for the noise functions. Without seeing the full derivations and any checks on those corrections, it is hard to judge how broad the incompleteness result actually is. This is for readers working on Majorana transport, non-Markovian master equations, and noise spectroscopy in mesoscopic systems. A serious referee should see it to verify the math and the range of validity of the approximation.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that complete knowledge of the non-Markovian dynamics of a floating Majorana island (via memory kernels generated by a Schrieffer-Wolff transformation in the cotunneling regime) does not determine the thermodynamic transport statistics measured in the leads. It formulates a thermodynamic completeness criterion: an island memory equation fixes a transport observable only if that observable is invariant under all reservoir-channel assignments consistent with the same kernel. This leads to the prediction that devices with identical island-state tomography and relaxation can exhibit different lead-resolved charge noise, heat noise, and charge-energy correlations.

Significance. If the central claim holds within the stated regime, the result identifies a structural loss of thermodynamic information when tracing out structured reservoirs, with direct experimental implications for Majorana-device characterization via island tomography versus lead noise measurements. The memory-kernel approach and the completeness criterion supply a falsifiable, geometry-dependent test that distinguishes this incompleteness from mere approximation error.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / Schrieffer-Wolff derivation] Abstract and the paragraph deriving the memory kernel: the assertion that each Majorana-bilinear kernel is independent of which lead supplies or absorbs the electron rests on the cotunneling Schrieffer-Wolff truncation; the manuscript does not supply the explicit second-order kernel or bound the O(t^3) corrections that could generate lead-specific contributions to the effective dynamics, leaving open whether those terms restore completeness for the noise correlators.
[Thermodynamic completeness criterion] The thermodynamic completeness criterion (final paragraph): it is stated that an observable is determined only when constant over channel assignments yielding the same kernel, but no explicit example calculation is given showing a concrete transport correlator (e.g., charge-noise spectrum) that differs while the island kernel remains fixed; without this, the measurable prediction remains schematic.

minor comments (1)

Notation for the memory kernel K(t) and the projection onto reservoir records should be introduced with a single equation early in the text rather than only in the abstract.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We appreciate the recognition of the potential significance of the thermodynamic incompleteness result. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation where the comments identify gaps.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / Schrieffer-Wolff derivation] Abstract and the paragraph deriving the memory kernel: the assertion that each Majorana-bilinear kernel is independent of which lead supplies or absorbs the electron rests on the cotunneling Schrieffer-Wolff truncation; the manuscript does not supply the explicit second-order kernel or bound the O(t^3) corrections that could generate lead-specific contributions to the effective dynamics, leaving open whether those terms restore completeness for the noise correlators.

Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the second-order kernel clarifies the claimed independence. In the revised manuscript we have inserted the explicit second-order memory kernel (new Eq. (3) in Sec. II) obtained from the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation. The kernel for each Majorana bilinear is built from the reservoir correlation functions evaluated at the virtual intermediate states; because the bilinear operator itself resides entirely on the island, the resulting kernel is independent of which reservoir channel supplies the virtual electron. We have also added a bound on the O(t^3) remainder: these corrections are suppressed by an extra factor of the tunnel amplitude over the charging energy and remain lead-independent within the cotunneling regime (Γ ≪ E_C, |eV|, T). The completeness criterion therefore continues to hold at the order retained in the paper. revision: yes
Referee: [Thermodynamic completeness criterion] The thermodynamic completeness criterion (final paragraph): it is stated that an observable is determined only when constant over channel assignments yielding the same kernel, but no explicit example calculation is given showing a concrete transport correlator (e.g., charge-noise spectrum) that differs while the island kernel remains fixed; without this, the measurable prediction remains schematic.

Authors: We accept that an explicit, calculable example is needed to make the prediction falsifiable. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Sec. IV B) containing a minimal two-Majorana, two-lead model with unequal reservoir densities of states. For two different channel assignments that produce identical island memory kernels, we explicitly compute the lead-resolved charge-noise spectra S_{11}(ω) and S_{22}(ω) and show that they differ by an amount set by the density-of-states asymmetry, while the island relaxation rates and state tomography remain unchanged. This supplies the concrete, geometry-dependent signature requested. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation of incompleteness is self-contained without circular reduction

full rationale

The paper constructs memory kernels explicitly via Schrieffer-Wolff transformation of the tunnel Hamiltonian in the cotunneling regime, followed by tracing out the reservoirs. Island-state dynamics fix these kernels, which determine all island observables but leave lead-channel assignments underdetermined. The completeness criterion is a direct logical statement about constancy over kernel-equivalent assignments, not a tautology or fit. No parameters are fitted, no self-citations are load-bearing, and no ansatz is smuggled; the non-injectivity is exhibited by the structure of the projected dynamics. The result is independent of external benchmarks and does not reduce to its inputs by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The argument rests on the validity of the cotunneling approximation and Schrieffer-Wolff transformation in the stated regime; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Schrieffer-Wolff transformation generates reservoir-assisted transitions from Majorana bilinears in the cotunneling regime
Invoked to obtain the effective island dynamics after tracing out reservoirs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5554 in / 1168 out tokens · 42964 ms · 2026-05-14T21:31:46.898723+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

The two energy-filtered devices in Eqs. (34) and (35) realize the same idea in the smallest channel space: di- agonal and off-diagonal channel pairings have the same projection onto the island memory kernel, but they oc- cupy different directions in the space of measured trans- port records and therefore give different heat noise in Eq. (36). The fixed to...

work page
[2]

Michaeli, L

K. Michaeli, L. A. Landau, E. Sela, and L. Fu, Electron teleportation and statistical transmutation in multiter- minal majorana islands, Physical Review B96, 205403 (2017)

work page 2017
[3]

Beri and N

B. Beri and N. R. Cooper, Topological kondo effect with majorana fermions, Physical Review Letters109, 156803 (2012)

work page 2012
[4]

R. M. Lutchyn and L. I. Glazman, Transport through a majorana island in the strong tunneling regime, Physical Review Letters119, 057002 (2017)

work page 2017
[5]

Kleinherbers, A

E. Kleinherbers, A. Schunemann, and J. Konig, Full counting statistics in a majorana single-charge transis- tor, Physical Review B107, 195407 (2023)

work page 2023
[6]

Schuray, M

A. Schuray, M. Rammler, and P. Recher, Signatures of the majorana spin in electrical transport through a ma- jorana nanowire, Physical Review B102, 045303 (2020)

work page 2020
[7]

Zhang and H

F. Zhang and H. T. Quan, Full counting statistics of the particle currents through a kitaev chain and the exchange fluctuation theorem, Physical Review E103, 032143 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

Wang, T.-G

C.-Y. Wang, T.-G. Zhou, Y.-N. Zhou, and P. Zhang, Distinguishing quantum phases through cusps in full counting statistics, Physical Review Letters133, 083402 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

McCulloch, J

E. McCulloch, J. De Nardis, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Full counting statistics of charge in chaotic many-body quantum systems, Physical Review Letters 131, 210402 (2023)

work page 2023
[10]

Tirrito, A

E. Tirrito, A. Santini, R. Fazio, and M. Collura, Full counting statistics as probe of measurement-induced transitions in the quantum ising chain, SciPost Physics 15, 096 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

P. J. Paulino, I. Lesanovsky, and F. Carollo, Large devi- ation full counting statistics in adiabatic open quantum dynamics, Physical Review Letters132, 260402 (2024)

work page 2024
[12]

Gerry and D

M. Gerry and D. Segal, Full counting statistics and co- herences: Fluctuation symmetry in heat transport with the unified quantum master equation, Physical Review E 107, 054115 (2023)

work page 2023
[13]

Engelhardt, J

G. Engelhardt, J. Luo, V. M. Bastidas, and G. Platero, Photon-resolved floquet theory. i. full counting statistics of the driving field in floquet systems, Physical Review A110, 063707 (2024)

work page 2024
[14]

Engelhardt, J

G. Engelhardt, J. Luo, V. M. Bastidas, and G. Platero, Photon-resolved floquet theory. ii. open quantum sys- tems, Physical Review A110, 063708 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

Milz and K

S. Milz and K. Modi, Quantum stochastic processes and quantum non-markovian phenomena, PRX Quantum2, 030201 (2021)

work page 2021
[16]

S. Luo, N. Lambert, P. Liang, and M. Cirio, Quantum- classical decomposition of gaussian quantum environ- ments: A stochastic pseudomode model, PRX Quantum 4, 030316 (2023)

work page 2023
[17]

Cockrell and I

C. Cockrell and I. J. Ford, Stochastic thermodynamics in a non-markovian dynamical system, Physical Review E105, 064124 (2022). 7

work page 2022
[18]

H. T. Senyasa, S. Kesgin, G. Karpat, and B. Cakmak, En- tropy production in non-markovian collision models: In- formation backflow vs. system-environment correlations, Entropy24, 824 (2022)

work page 2022
[19]

Ghoshal and U

A. Ghoshal and U. Sen, Heat current and entropy pro- duction rate in local non-markovian quantum dynamics of global markovian evolution, Physical Review A105, 022424 (2022)

work page 2022
[20]

Wisniewski, J

M. Wisniewski, J. uczka, and J. Spiechowicz, Memory corrections to markovian langevin dynamics, Entropy26, 425 (2024)

work page 2024
[21]

Fiorelli, S

E. Fiorelli, S. Gherardini, and S. Marcantoni, Stochas- tic entropy production: Fluctuation relation and irre- versibility mitigation in non-unital quantum dynamics, Journal of Statistical Physics190, 111 (2023)

work page 2023
[22]

Zhang, X

K. Zhang, X. Wang, Q. Zeng, and J. Wang, Conditional entropy production and quantum fluctuation theorem of dissipative information: Theory and experiments, PRX Quantum3, 030315 (2022)

work page 2022
[23]

Q. Wu, L. Mancino, M. Carlesso, M. A. Ciampini, L. Ma- grini, N. Kiesel, and M. Paternostro, Nonequilibrium quantum thermodynamics of a particle trapped in a controllable time-varying potential, PRX Quantum3, 010322 (2022)

work page 2022
[24]

Hasegawa, Quantum thermodynamic uncertainty re- lation for continuous measurement, Physical Review Let- ters125, 050601 (2020)

Y. Hasegawa, Quantum thermodynamic uncertainty re- lation for continuous measurement, Physical Review Let- ters125, 050601 (2020)

work page 2020
[25]

Hasegawa, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for general open quantum systems, Physical Review Letters 126, 010602 (2021)

Y. Hasegawa, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for general open quantum systems, Physical Review Letters 126, 010602 (2021)

work page 2021
[26]

Hasegawa, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for quantum first-passage processes, Physical Review E105, 044127 (2022)

Y. Hasegawa, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for quantum first-passage processes, Physical Review E105, 044127 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

D. S. P. Salazar, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for quantum entropy production, Physical Review E110, 014118 (2024)

work page 2024
[28]

Liu and D

J. Liu and D. Segal, Coherences and the thermodynamic uncertainty relation: Insights from quantum absorption refrigerators, Physical Review E103, 032138 (2021)

work page 2021
[29]

Monnai, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for quantum work distribution: Exact case study for a per- turbed oscillator, Physical Review E105, 034115 (2022)

T. Monnai, Thermodynamic uncertainty relation for quantum work distribution: Exact case study for a per- turbed oscillator, Physical Review E105, 034115 (2022)

work page 2022
[30]

Reiche, J.-T

D. Reiche, J.-T. Hsiang, and B.-L. Hu, Quantum thermo- dynamic uncertainty relations, generalized current fluc- tuations and nonequilibrium fluctuationdissipation in- equalities, Entropy24, 1016 (2022)

work page 2022
[31]

Ziyin and M

L. Ziyin and M. Ueda, Universal thermodynamic uncer- tainty relation in nonequilibrium dynamics, Physical Re- view Research5, 013039 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

Hasegawa, Irreversibility, loschmidt echo, and thermo- dynamic uncertainty relation, Physical Review Letters 127, 240602 (2021)

Y. Hasegawa, Irreversibility, loschmidt echo, and thermo- dynamic uncertainty relation, Physical Review Letters 127, 240602 (2021)

work page 2021
[33]

Monnai, Arbitrary-time thermodynamic uncertainty relation from fluctuation theorem, Physical Review E 108, 024119 (2023)

T. Monnai, Arbitrary-time thermodynamic uncertainty relation from fluctuation theorem, Physical Review E 108, 024119 (2023)

work page 2023
[34]

J. A. Almanza-Marrero and G. Manzano, Certifying quantum enhancements in thermal machines beyond the thermodynamic uncertainty relation, Quantum9, 1878 (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

Hamazaki, Speed limits for macroscopic transitions, PRX Quantum3, 020319 (2022)

R. Hamazaki, Speed limits for macroscopic transitions, PRX Quantum3, 020319 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

P. M. Poggi, S. Campbell, and S. Deffner, Diverging quantum speed limits: A herald of classicality, PRX Quantum2, 040349 (2021)

work page 2021
[37]

K. Lan, S. Xie, and X. Cai, Geometric quantum speed limits for markovian dynamics in open quantum systems, New Journal of Physics24, 055003 (2022)

work page 2022
[38]

G. T. Landi and M. Paternostro, Irreversible entropy pro- duction: From classical to quantum, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 035008 (2021)

work page 2021
[39]

Falasco and M

G. Falasco and M. Esposito, Macroscopic stochastic ther- modynamics, Reviews of Modern Physics97, 015002 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

Chatzittofi, R

M. Chatzittofi, R. Golestanian, and J. Agudo-Canalejo, Thermodynamic inference of correlations in nonequilib- rium collective dynamics, Physical Review Research6, L042012 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

P. E. Harunari, C. E. Fiore, and A. C. Barato, Infer- ence of entropy production for periodically driven sys- tems, Physical Review E110, 064126 (2024)

work page 2024
[42]

L. P. Bettmann and J. Goold, Information geometry ap- proach to quantum stochastic thermodynamics, Physical Review E111, 014133 (2025)

work page 2025
[43]

T. J. Kobayashi, D. Loutchko, A. Kamimura, and Y. Sug- hiyama, Hessian geometry of nonequilibrium chemical re- action networks and entropy production decompositions, Physical Review Research4, 033208 (2022)

work page 2022
[44]

Brandner and K

K. Brandner and K. Saito, Thermodynamic geometry of microscopic heat engines, Physical Review Letters124, 040602 (2020)

work page 2020
[45]

Nakazato and S

M. Nakazato and S. Ito, Geometrical aspects of en- tropy production in stochastic thermodynamics based on wasserstein distance, Physical Review Research3, 043093 (2021)

work page 2021
[46]

Giordano, Entropy production and onsager recipro- cal relations describing the relaxation to equilibrium in stochastic thermodynamics, Physical Review E103, 052116 (2021)

S. Giordano, Entropy production and onsager recipro- cal relations describing the relaxation to equilibrium in stochastic thermodynamics, Physical Review E103, 052116 (2021)

work page 2021
[47]

M. P. Leighton and D. A. Sivak, Jensen bound for the entropy production rate in stochastic thermodynamics, Physical Review E109, L012101 (2024)

work page 2024
[48]

Tasnim and D

F. Tasnim and D. H. Wolpert, Stochastic thermodynam- ics of multiple co-evolving systemsbeyond multipartite processes, Entropy25, 1078 (2023)

work page 2023
[49]

G. S. Chirikjian, Rate of entropy production in stochastic mechanical systems, Entropy24, 19 (2021)

work page 2021
[50]

Zamparo and M

M. Zamparo and M. Semeraro, Large deviations for quadratic functionals of stable gaussmarkov chains and entropy production, Journal of Mathematical Physics64, 023302 (2023)

work page 2023
[51]

Budhiraja, Y

A. Budhiraja, Y. Chen, and L. Xu, Large deviations of the entropy production rate for a class of gaussian processes, Journal of Mathematical Physics62, 052702 (2021)

work page 2021
[52]

Roberts, A

D. Roberts, A. Lingenfelter, and A. Clerk, Hidden time- reversal symmetry, quantum detailed balance and exact solutions of driven-dissipative quantum systems, PRX Quantum2, 020336 (2021)

work page 2021
[53]

J. E. Brasil, J. Knorst, and A. O. Lopes, Thermodynamic formalism for continuous-time quantum markov semi- groups: the detailed balance condition, entropy, pressure and equilibrium quantum processes, Open Systems & In- formation Dynamics30, 2350018 (2023)

work page 2023
[54]

R. C. Kraaij, A. Lazarescu, C. Maes, and M. A. Peletier, Fluctuation symmetry leads to GENERIC equations with non-quadratic dissipation, Stochastic Processes and their Applications130, 139 (2020)

work page 2020
[55]

R. I. A. Patterson, D. R. M. Renger, and U. Sharma, 8 Variational structures beyond gradient flows: a Macro- scopic Fluctuation-Theory perspective, Journal of Statis- tical Physics191, 18 (2024)

work page 2024
[56]

D. R. M. Renger and U. Sharma, Untangling dissipative and Hamiltonian effects in bulk and boundary-driven sys- tems, Physical Review E108, 054123 (2023)

work page 2023
[57]

Doyon, G

B. Doyon, G. Perfetto, T. Sasamoto, and T. Yoshimura, Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory, SciPost Physics 15, 136 (2023)

work page 2023
[58]

Kundu, Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory of correlations in hard-rod gas, Journal of Statistical Me- chanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 103203 (2025)

A. Kundu, Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory of correlations in hard-rod gas, Journal of Statistical Me- chanics: Theory and Experiment2025, 103203 (2025)

work page 2025
[59]

Agranov, S

T. Agranov, S. Ro, Y. Kafri, and V. Lecomte, Macro- scopic fluctuation theory and current fluctuations in ac- tive lattice gases, SciPost Physics14, 045 (2023)

work page 2023
[60]

Mallick, H

K. Mallick, H. Moriya, and T. Sasamoto, Exact solutions to macroscopic fluctuation theory through classical inte- grable systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2024, 074001 (2024)

work page 2024
[61]

Krajenbrink and P

A. Krajenbrink and P. Le Doussal, Crossover from the macroscopic fluctuation theory to the kardar-parisi- zhang equation controls the large deviations beyond ein- stein’s diffusion, Physical Review E107, 014137 (2023)

work page 2023
[62]

Bouley and C

A. Bouley and C. Landim, Dynamical large deviations for boundary driven gradient symmetric exclusion pro- cesses in mild contact with reservoirs, Journal of Statis- tical Physics191, 132 (2024)

work page 2024
[63]

Peletier, N

M. Peletier, N. Gavish, and P. Nyquist, Large deviations and gradient flows for the brownian one-dimensional hard-rod system, Potential Analysis58, 71 (2023)

work page 2023
[64]

Martin, J

D. Martin, J. O’Byrne, M. E. Cates, ´E. Fodor, C. Nar- dini, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Statistical mechan- ics of active ornstein-uhlenbeck particles, Physical Re- view E103, 032607 (2021)

work page 2021
[65]

Thermodynamic completeness in quantum and classical Markovian dynamics

Y. Tian, Thermodynamic incompleteness of state dy- namics in markovian transport, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2605.02650 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[66]

J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Relation between the anderson and kondo hamiltonians, Physical Review149, 491 (1966)

work page 1966