pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05785 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🪐 quant-ph

Optical Pulling Force in Carbon Nanotubes: Manifestation of Nonlocal Conductivity

Tomer Berghaus , Touvia Miloh , Gregory Ya. Slepyan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 11:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords carbon nanotubesoptical forcenonlocal conductivityoptical pullingintegral equationfinite-length conductors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonlocal conductivity produces negative optical forces on finite carbon nanotubes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a theory of the optical force on a finite-length carbon nanotube by treating its conductivity as nonlocal, so that the response at one point depends on the field at neighboring points. It expresses the force through the surface current and the axial electric field, solves for both via an integral equation that incorporates edge effects at the tube ends, and derives a simpler analytical approximation that matches the numerical results. The calculation reveals frequency intervals where the force reverses sign and pulls the nanotube toward the light source; this reversal disappears entirely when the conductivity is made local.

Core claim

The optical force on a finite-length carbon nanotube is obtained from the surface current density and axial electric field evaluated on its surface. An integral-equation formulation for the current, solved with full account of the tube ends, yields a force that is negative over selected frequency bands. The negativity is produced by the spatial dispersion inherent in the nonlocal conductivity and is absent once that nonlocality is removed.

What carries the argument

Nonlocal conductivity expressed through an integral equation for the axial current on a finite cylinder, with explicit edge corrections.

If this is right

  • The optical force changes sign with frequency only when spatial dispersion is retained.
  • An approximate closed-form expression for the force reproduces the full numerical solution of the integral equation.
  • The pulling effect is extinguished in the limit of strictly local conductivity.
  • Accurate modeling of short tubes requires retention of the boundary corrections at both ends.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar pulling forces could appear in other finite low-dimensional conductors once their nonlocal response is included.
  • Frequency windows for pulling might be engineered to sort or transport specific nanotubes within a mixture.
  • Optomechanical control of nanoscale objects may become possible without auxiliary structures once nonlocality is exploited.

Load-bearing premise

The nonlocal conductivity model correctly describes how the carbon nanotube responds to the electromagnetic field at the frequencies of interest.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the optical force on an isolated, finite-length carbon nanotube and finds it remains positive at all frequencies where the nonlocal model predicts a negative value.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05785 by Gregory Ya. Slepyan, Tomer Berghaus, Touvia Miloh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG 1. Configuration of view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dependence of the optical force on the angle of incidence for different CNT lengths. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a new theory of an optical force exerted on a carbon nanotube (CNT) with a nonlocal conductivity. The optical force is expressed in terms of the surface current density and the axial electric field on the CNT surface. To determine these quantities, we employ an integral-equation-based approach in terms of the current density. The analysis is constructed for a finite-length cylindrical CNT by rigorously accounting for edge effects. In addition to numerical solutions of the integral equation, we obtain an approximate analytical expression for the optical force acting on the CNT, which shows good agreement with numerical simulations. We also demonstrate the existence of some frequency ranges in which the optical force becomes negative, corresponding to the optical pulling effect. Such a pulling behavior is shown to originate from the nonlocality of the conductivity and to vanish in the local limit. This work advances theoretical understanding of optomechanical interactions in finite-length low-dimensional conductors and clarifies the role of spatial dispersion in the emergence of optical pulling forces.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a theory for the optical force on a finite-length carbon nanotube with nonlocal conductivity. The force is expressed via surface current density and axial electric field, obtained from an integral-equation formulation that rigorously includes edge effects. Both numerical solutions of the integral equation and an approximate analytical expression are presented, with reported good agreement. The central result is the identification of frequency ranges yielding negative (pulling) optical force; this effect is shown to arise from nonlocality and to vanish when the nonlocal term is removed (local limit).

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work is significant for clarifying the role of spatial dispersion in optomechanical interactions with low-dimensional conductors. The explicit demonstration that pulling disappears in the local limit provides a direct internal consistency check supporting the origin claim. The dual numerical-plus-analytical approach is a strength, offering both computational rigor and insight into the underlying mechanism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Integral-equation approach and numerical implementation] The integral-equation formulation (described in the abstract and presumably §2–3) accounts for edge effects, but the manuscript must specify the discretization scheme, basis functions, and convergence criteria used for the numerical solution; without these, it is difficult to assess the accuracy of the surface current and resulting force, especially near the frequencies where the sign change occurs.
  2. [Approximate analytical expression] The approximate analytical expression for the force is stated to agree well with numerics, yet the derivation assumptions (e.g., form of the current distribution, wavelength regime, or truncation of the nonlocal kernel) are not delineated in the provided abstract; these must be stated explicitly so that the range of validity can be evaluated against the numerical results.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figures comparing local and nonlocal cases should include error bars or residual plots to quantify the agreement between numerical and analytical results.
  2. Notation for the nonlocal conductivity kernel and the force integral should be introduced with a clear reference to the underlying dispersion model (hydrodynamic or otherwise) used for the CNT.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation for minor revision. The comments identify key areas where additional detail will improve clarity and reproducibility. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested information in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Integral-equation approach and numerical implementation] The integral-equation formulation (described in the abstract and presumably §2–3) accounts for edge effects, but the manuscript must specify the discretization scheme, basis functions, and convergence criteria used for the numerical solution; without these, it is difficult to assess the accuracy of the surface current and resulting force, especially near the frequencies where the sign change occurs.

    Authors: We agree that these implementation details are necessary for readers to evaluate numerical accuracy. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) that specifies the discretization scheme, the basis functions employed for the surface current density, and the convergence criteria (including how stability of the force was verified with increasing resolution, particularly near sign-change frequencies). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Approximate analytical expression] The approximate analytical expression for the force is stated to agree well with numerics, yet the derivation assumptions (e.g., form of the current distribution, wavelength regime, or truncation of the nonlocal kernel) are not delineated in the provided abstract; these must be stated explicitly so that the range of validity can be evaluated against the numerical results.

    Authors: We concur that the assumptions underlying the approximate analytical expression must be stated explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant section to delineate the form of the current distribution used, the wavelength regime, any truncation applied to the nonlocal kernel, and the conditions under which the approximation is expected to hold, allowing direct comparison with the numerical results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the optical force from an integral-equation formulation for the surface current on a finite-length CNT, incorporating nonlocal conductivity and edge effects, then computes the force from the resulting current and axial field. An approximate analytical expression is obtained and shown to agree with numerical solutions. The key claim—that negative (pulling) force appears only with nonlocality—is supported by explicitly recovering the local limit where pulling vanishes, which is an internal consistency verification rather than a reduction by construction. No load-bearing step reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work; the approach follows standard methods for spatially dispersive conductors without importing uniqueness theorems or renaming known results. The derivation chain remains independent of its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on Maxwell equations with a nonlocal conductivity kernel for the CNT surface, plus the assumption that edge effects can be captured by an integral equation for finite length. No new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Nonlocal conductivity model (spatial dispersion) for the CNT surface current response
    Invoked throughout to derive the force expression and to show that pulling disappears in the local limit.
  • domain assumption Integral-equation formulation correctly incorporates edge effects for finite-length cylinder
    Used to obtain both numerical solutions and the approximate analytical force formula.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1482 out tokens · 50851 ms · 2026-05-08T11:44:40.814391+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    V. E. Lembessis and D. L. Andrews, Forces in the interaction of light with matter, Appl. Sci. 14, 7008 (2024)

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Tamura, T

    M. Tamura, T. Wada, and H. Ishihara, Basics of optical force, J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 54, 100570 (2023)

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Zhang, C

    Y. Zhang, C. Min, X. Dou, X. Wang, H. P. Urbach, M. G. Somekh, and X. Yuan, Plasmonic tweezers: for nanoscale optical trapping and beyond , Light Sci. Appl. 10, 59 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    D. Gao, W. Ding, M. Nieto-Vesperinas, X. Ding, M. Rahman, T. Zhang, C. T. Lim, and C.-W. Qiu, Optical manipulation from the microscale to the nanoscale: fundamentals, advances and prospects, Light Sci. Appl. 6, e17039 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    M. J. F. Riccardi and O. J. F. Martin, Electromagnetic forces and torques: from dielectrophoresis to optical tweezers, Chem. Rev. 123, 1680 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    H. Xin, Y. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Xiao, and B. Li, Optical forces: from fundamental to biological applications, Adv. Mater. 32, 2001994 (2020). 12

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Y. Yang, Y. -X. Ren, M. Chen, Y. Arita, and C. Rosales -Guzmán, Optical trapping with structured light: a review, Adv. Photonics, 3, 034001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Kiasat, M

    Y. Kiasat, M. G. Donato, M. Hinczewski, M. ElKabbash,T. Letsou, R. Saija, O. M. Maragò, G. Strangi, and N. Engheta, Epsilon-near-zero (ENZ)-based optomechanics, Commun. Phys. 6:69, (2023)

    work page 2023

  9. [9]

    G . D. Bruce , P . Rodríguez-Sevilla, and K. Dholakia, Initiating revolutions for optical manipulation: the origins and applications of rotational dynamics of trapped particles, Advances in Physics X, 6:1, 1838322, (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Nieto-Vesperinas, Xumin Ding, M

    Dongliang Gao, Weiqiang Ding, M . Nieto-Vesperinas, Xumin Ding, M . Rahman,Tianhang Zhang, Chwee Teck Lim, and Cheng-Wei Qiu, Optical manipulation from the microscale to the nanoscale: fundamentals, advances and prospects, Light: Science and Applications 6, e17039 , (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Qiannan Jia, Wei Lyu, Wei Yan, Weiwei Tang , Jinsheng L, and Min Qiu, Optical manipulation: from fluid to solid domains, Photonics Insights R05-12023, 2(2) (2023)

    work page 2023

  12. [12]

    Sukhov and A

    S. Sukhov and A. Dogariu, Non-conservative optical forces, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 112001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    J. R. Moffitt,Y. R.Chemla, S. B.Smith, and C. Bustamante, Recent advances in optical tweezers, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77:19.1–19.24 (2008)

    work page 2008

  14. [14]

    D. Ma, X. Ren, J. Zheng, L. Zheng, T. Yang, H. Pang, W. Chen, Z. Lin, and X. Liu, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 14, 1746261 (2026)

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    P. N. Lebedev, Investigations on the pressure forces of light, Ann. Phys. 6, 433 (1901)

    work page 1901

  16. [16]

    Nichols and G

    E.F. Nichols and G. Hull, A preliminary communication on the pressure of heat and light radiation, Phys.Rev. I, 13, 307 (1901)

    work page 1901

  17. [17]

    Ashkin, Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure, Phys

    A. Ashkin, Acceleration and Trapping of Particles by Radiation Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 156 (1970)

    work page 1970

  18. [18]

    Ashkin, J

    A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles, Opt. Lett. 11, 816 (1986)

    work page 1986

  19. [19]

    O. M. Maragò, P. H. Jones, P. G. Gucciardi, G. Volpe, and A. C. Ferrari, Optical trapping and manipulation of nanostructures, Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 807 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gröblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quantum technologies, Nat. Phys. 18, 15 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    C. J. Bustamante, Y. R. Chemla, S. Liu, and M. D. Wang, Optical tweezers in single- molecule biophysics, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 1, 25 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Y. Zhu, M. You, Y. Shi, H. Huang, Z. Wei, T. He, S. Xiong, Z. Wang, and X. Cheng, Optofluidic tweezers: efficient and versatile micro/nano-manipulation tools, Micromachines 14, 1326 (2023)

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Huaxin Li, Yatao Ren, Yang Li, Min gjian He , B aohal Gao, and Hong Qi , Nanoparticle manipulation using plasmonic optical tweezers based on particle sizes and refractive indices, Optics Express 30, 19,12, 34092 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Jahng, J

    J. Jahng, J. Brocious, D. A. Fishman, F. Huang, X. Li, V. A. Tamma, H. K. Wickramasinghe, and E. O. Potma, Gradient and scattering forces in photoinduced force microscopy, Phys. Rev. B 90, 155417 (2014)

    work page 2014

  25. [25]

    W. Yi, H. Huang, C. Lai, T. He, Z. Wang, X. Dai, Y. Shi, and X. Cheng, Optical forces on chiral particles: science and applications Micromachines, 15, 1267 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Horai, H

    T. Horai, H. Eguchi, T. Iida, and H. Ishihara, Formulation of resonant optical force based on the microscopic structure of chiral molecules, Opt. Express 29, 38824 (2021)

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Yannopapas, Optical forces near a plasmonic nanostructure, Phys

    V. Yannopapas, Optical forces near a plasmonic nanostructure, Phys. Rev. B 78, 045412 (2008)

    work page 2008

  28. [28]

    Yang and K

    L.-F. Yang and K. J. Webb, Pushing and pulling optical pressure control with plasmonic surface waves, Phys. Rev. B 103, 245124 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    X. Bian, D. L. Gao, and L. Gao, Tailoring optical pulling force on gain coated nanoparticles with nonlocal effective medium theory, Opt. Express 25, 2456 (2017). 13

    work page 2017

  30. [30]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y. Peng, C. Lee, X. Chu, Y. Xiao, H. Wang, F. Xie, J. Liu, and Y. Yuan, Significant optical force enhancements of nanostructure with balanced gain and loss, Opt. Express 29, 22202 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Monticone, N

    F. Monticone, N. A. Mortensen, A. I. Fernández -Domínguez, et al., Nonlocality in photonic materials and metamaterials: roadmap, Opt. Mater. Express 15, 1544 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    X. Z., D. Bongiovanni, D. Song, R. Morandotti, H. Buljan, L. Tang, and Z. Chen, Optical pulling force on Janus particles via azimuthally -polarized Bessel beams, Opt. Express 33, 4625 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Balaei and T

    M. Balaei and T. Naseri, Optical pulling force upon elliptical cylinder nanoparticles in the infrared range, Opt. Continuum 1, 535 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Wilson-Rae, C

    I. Wilson-Rae, C. Galland, W. Zwerger, and A. Imamoğlu, Exciton-assisted optomechanics with suspended carbon nanotubes, New J. Phys. 14, 115003 (2012)

    work page 2012

  35. [35]

    Zhang, G

    P. Zhang, G. Song, and L. Yu, Optical trapping of single quantum dots for cavity quantum electrodynamics, Photonics Res. 6, 182 (2018)

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Conti and R

    C. Conti and R. Boyd, Nonlinear optomechanical pressure, Phys. Rev. A 89, 033834 (2014)

    work page 2014

  37. [37]

    A. A. Bogdanov, A. S. Shalin, and P. Ginzburg, Optical forces in nanorod metamaterial, Sci. Rep. 5, 15838 (2015)

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    B. Wei, S. Gong, R. Li, I.V . Minin, O.V. Minin, L. Lin, Optical force on a metal nanorod exerted by a photonic jet. Nanomaterials 12, 251 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Hengzhi Li, Wanyue Xiao, Tong Fu, Zheng Yang, and Shubo Wang, Optical force and torque on a spinning dielectric sphere, Phys. Rev. A 111, 063512 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Hang Li, Yongyin Cao, Lei-Ming Zhou, Xiaohao Xu, Tongtong Zhu, Yuzhi Shi, Cheng-Wei Qiu, and Weiqiang Ding, Optical pulling forces and their applications, Advances in Optics and Photonics 12, 2 (2020)

    work page 2020

  41. [41]

    J. Chen, J. Ng, Z. Lin, and C. T. Chan, Optical pulling force, Nat. Photonics 5, 531 (2011)

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    Novitsky, C.-W

    A. Novitsky, C.-W. Qiu, and H. Wang, Single gradientless light beam drags particles as tractor beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 203601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [43]

    negative forces

    A. Dogariu, S. Sukhov, and J. Sáenz, Optically induced “negative forces”, Nat. Photonics 7, 24 (2013)

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    D. Gao, A. Novitsky, T. Zhang, F. C. Cheong, L. Gao, C. T. Lim, B. Luk’yanchuk, and C. - W. Qiu, Unveiling the correlation between non-diffracting tractor beam and its singularity in Poynting vector, Laser Photonics Rev. 9, 75 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [45]

    Zhang, X

    L. Zhang, X. Qiu, L. Zeng, and L. Chen, Multiple trapping using a focused hybrid vector beam, Chin. Phys. B 28, 094202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    L. Ling, H. -L. Guo, L. Huang, E. Qu, Z. -L. Li, and Z. -Y. Li, Chin. The measurement of displacement and optical force in multi-optical tweezers, Phys. Lett. 29, 014214 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Lepeshov and A

    S. Lepeshov and A. Krasnok, Virtual optical pulling force, Optica 7, 1024 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    G. Guo, T. Feng, and Y. Xu, Tunable optical pulling force mediated by resonant electromagnetic coupling, Opt. Lett. 43, 4961 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    E. Lee, D. Huang, and T. Luo, Ballistic supercavitating nanoparticles driven by single gaussian beam optical pushing and pulling forces, Nat. Commun. 11, 2404 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Novitsky and C.-W

    A. Novitsky and C.-W. Qiu, Pulling Extremely anisotropic lossy particles using light without intensity gradient, Phys. Rev. A 90, 053815 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    W. Lu, A. V. Krasavin, S. Lan, A. V. Zayats, and Q. Dai, Gradient-induced long-range optical pulling force based on photonic bandgap, Light Sci. Appl. 13, 93 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    J. Chen, J. Ng, K. Ding, K. H. Fung, Z. Lin, and C. T. Chan, Negative optical torque, Sci. Rep. 4, 6386 (2014)

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Ding and C

    K. Ding and C. T. Chan, Optical forces, torques, and force densities calculated at a microscopic level using a self -consistent hydrodynamics method, Phys. Rev. B 97, 155118 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, Electrodynamics of Continuous Media, 2th ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 1984). 14

    work page 1984

  55. [55]

    Brevik, Experiments in phenomenological electrodynamics and the electromagnetic energy- momentum tensor, Phys

    I. Brevik, Experiments in phenomenological electrodynamics and the electromagnetic energy- momentum tensor, Phys. Rep. 52,133 (1979)

    work page 1979

  56. [56]

    Abraham, On the electrodynamics of Minkowski, Rend

    M. Abraham, On the electrodynamics of Minkowski, Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo 30, 33 (1910)

    work page 1910

  57. [57]

    Minkowski, The Basic Equations for Electromagnetic Processes in Moving Bodies, Math

    H. Minkowski, The Basic Equations for Electromagnetic Processes in Moving Bodies, Math. Ann. 68, 472 (1910)

    work page 1910

  58. [58]

    Einstein and J

    A. Einstein and J. Laub, On the pondermotive forces exerted on bodies at rest in the electromagnetic field, Ann. Phys. 26, 541 (1908)

    work page 1908

  59. [59]

    D. S. Bradshaw and D. L. Andrews, Optically induced forces and torques: interactions between nanoparticles in a laser beam, Phys. Rev. A 72, 033816 (2005)

    work page 2005

  60. [60]

    Aloufi, V

    K. Aloufi, V. E. Lembessis, and O. M. Aldossary, Revision of the forces exerted in the Rayleigh regime by a tightly focused optical vortex tweezer, Phys. Rev. A 109, 023530 (2024)

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    E. A. Laird, F. Kuemmeth, G. A. Steele, K. Grove-Rasmussen, J. Nygård, K. Flensberg, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Quantum transport in carbon nanotubes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 703 (2015)

    work page 2015

  62. [62]

    Baydin, F

    A. Baydin, F. Tay, J. Fan, M. Manjappa, W. Gao, and J. Kono, Carbon nanotube devices for quantum technology, Materials 15, 1535 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    M. F. L. De Volder, S. H. Tawfick, R. H. Baughman, and A. J. Hart, Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications, Science 339, 535 (2013)

    work page 2013

  64. [64]

    J. E. Omoriyekomwan, A. Tahmasebi, J. Zhang, and J. Yu, Synthesis of super-long carbon nanotubes from cellulosic biomass under microwave radiation, Nanomaterials 12 (2022)

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Rodgers, S

    D. Rodgers, S. Shoji, Z. Sekkat, and S. Kawata, Selective aggregation of single-walled carbon nanotubes using the large optical field gradient of a focused laser beam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 127402 (2008)

    work page 2008

  66. [66]

    O. M. Maragò, P. G. Gucciardi, F. Bonaccorso, G. Calogero, V. Scardaci, A. G. Rozhin, A. C. Ferrari, P. H. Jones, R. Saija, F. Borghese, P. Denti, and M. A. Iatì, Optical trapping of carbon nanotubes, Physica E 40, 2347 (2008)

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    Pistolesi, A

    F. Pistolesi, A. N. Cleland, and A. Bachtold, Proposal for a nanomechanical qubit, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031027 (2021)

    work page 2021

  68. [68]

    Natsuki, Carbon nanotube-based nanomechanical sensor: theoretical analysis of mechanical and vibrational properties, Electronics 6, 56 (2017)

    T. Natsuki, Carbon nanotube-based nanomechanical sensor: theoretical analysis of mechanical and vibrational properties, Electronics 6, 56 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    Berghaus, T

    T. Berghaus, T. Miloh, O. Gottlieb, and G. Y. Slepyan, Electrodynamics of carbon nanotubes with non-local surface conductivity, Appl. Sci. 15, 11398 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    L. A. Falkovsky and S. S. Pershoguba, Optical far-infrared properties of a graphene monolayer and multilayer, Phys. Rev. B 76, 153410 (2007)

    work page 2007

  71. [71]

    M. I. Katsnelson, Graphene: Carbon in Two Dimensions , 2 th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, )2020)

    work page 2020

  72. [72]

    G. Y. Slepyan, S. A. Maksimenko, A. Lakhtakia, O. Yevtushenko, and A. V. Gusakov, Electrodynamics of carbon nanotubes: dynamic conductivity, impedance boundary conditions, and surface wave propagation, Phys.Rev. B 60, 17136 (1999)

    work page 1999

  73. [73]

    See, Supplemental Material, in which given derivations of CNT non-local conductivity [69], effective boundary conditions for EM – field at the CNT surface [ 72], integral equation for the surface current [69,74]

    work page

  74. [74]

    G. Y. Slepyan, M. V. Shuba, S. A. Maksimenko, A. Lakhtakia, Theory of optical scattering by achiral carbon nanotubes and their potential as optical nanoantennas , Phys. Rev. B 73, 195416 (2006)

    work page 2006

  75. [75]

    G. W. Hanson, Fundamental transmitting properties of carbon nanotube antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 53(11), 3426 (2005)

    work page 2005

  76. [76]

    Hao and G

    J. Hao and G. W. Hanson, Infrared and optical properties of carbon nanotube dipole antennas. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 5(6), 766 (2006). 15

    work page 2006

  77. [77]

    M. V. Shuba, S. A. Maksimenko, and G. Ya. Slepyan, Absorption, cross -section and near - field enhancement in finite -length carbon nanotubes in the terahertz -to-optical range , J. Comput. Theor. Nanoscience 6, 1 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    M. V. Shuba, A. V. Melnikov, P. P. Kuzhir, S. A. Maksimenko, G. Y. Slepyan, A. Boag, A. M. Conte, O. Pulci, and S. Bellucci, Integral equation technique for scatterers with mesoscopic insertions: application to a carbon nanotube. Phys. Rev. B 96, 205414 (2017)

    work page 2017

  79. [79]

    M. V. Shuba, G. Y. Slepyan, S. A. Maksimenko, C. Thomsen, and A. Lakhtakia, Theory of multiwall carbon nanotubes as waveguides and antennas in the infrared and the visible regimes, Phys. Rev. B 79, 155403 (2009)

    work page 2009

  80. [80]

    A. V. Melnikov, P. P. Kuzhir, S. A. Maksimenko, G. Y. Slepyan, A. Boag, O. Pulci, I. A. Shelykh, and M. V. Shuba, Scattering of electromagnetic waves by two crossing metallic single-walled carbon nanotubes of finite length, Phys. Rev. B 103, 075438 (2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.