Classical General Relativity as a Non-Conservative Action-Dependent Field Theory

Callum Bell , David Sloan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords general relativityscaling symmetriesconformal geometrydissipative sectornon-conservative dynamicsHilbert actionsingular Lagrangians

0 comments

The pith

The dynamical content of general relativity can be recovered from conformal spacetime geometry plus a dissipative sector that replaces the eliminated scale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies prior results on scaling symmetries for singular Lagrangians to the first-order formulation of general relativity. By removing the conformal factor that encodes scale, the dynamics of the Hilbert action are preserved only when a dissipative sector is added to compensate. The resulting theory is non-conservative and action-dependent. Linearized metric perturbations satisfy a free wave equation while second-order terms introduce sourcing by quadratic perturbations together with explicit non-conservation. A reader would care because the reformulation shows how scale invariance can be traded for dissipation while keeping the same physical content.

Core claim

It is shown that the dynamical content of the Hilbert action may be formulated in terms of the conformal spacetime geometry, together with a dissipative sector, which is required in order to compensate the elimination of the notion of scale encoded by the conformal factor. The linearisation of the equations of motion yields first-order metric perturbations satisfying a free wave equation. The second-order dynamics are sourced by quadratic combinations of these perturbations yet remain non-conservative through coupling between the action sector and geometrical degrees of freedom.

What carries the argument

Scaling symmetries applied to the singular Lagrangian of first-order general relativity, which produces a dissipative sector compensating for removal of the conformal factor.

If this is right

First-order metric perturbations obey the free wave equation as in standard linearised gravity.
Second-order gravitational dynamics are sourced by quadratic combinations of first-order perturbations.
The full dynamics are non-conservative, with explicit coupling between the action-dependent sector and the geometrical degrees of freedom.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The non-conservative character at second order may be relevant for modelling energy loss in strong-field regimes such as black-hole mergers.
This trade-off between scale and dissipation could be explored in numerical relativity codes to test whether observable signatures appear beyond linear order.

Load-bearing premise

The dissipative sector introduced to compensate for scale elimination preserves the physical content of general relativity without introducing artifacts.

What would settle it

A direct calculation showing that the second-order equations of motion fail to recover the standard Einstein tensor when the dissipative terms are included.

read the original abstract

Scaling symmetries have previously been examined for classical field theories described by singular Lagrangians; in this article, we apply these results to the first-order formulation of General Relativity. It is shown that the dynamical content of the Hilbert action may be formulated in terms of the conformal spacetime geometry, together with a dissipative sector, which is required in order to compensate the elimination of the notion of scale encoded by the conformal factor. Further, we consider the linearisation of the equations of motion of the scale-invariant action, demonstrating that the first-order metric perturbations satisfy a free wave equation, as expected. The second-order dynamics, describing gravitational backreaction, are found to be sourced by quadratic combinations of the first-order perturbations. However, these dynamics are non-conservative, as is made manifest by the presence of terms which couple the action sector with the geometrical degrees of freedom.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

GR reformulated with scaling symmetries yields non-conservative second-order dynamics via conformal geometry and dissipation, with the linear check working but second-order equivalence needing explicit confirmation.

read the letter

The main point is that this work takes scaling symmetry results for singular Lagrangians and applies them to the first-order GR action. It reformulates the dynamics using conformal spacetime geometry plus a dissipative sector to make up for removing the scale degree of freedom. The linearised equations give the free wave equation for perturbations, which checks out. At second order, the backreaction is sourced by quadratic terms but turns out non-conservative because of couplings between the action sector and geometry. This is new in the sense that it makes the non-conservative character explicit in this framework, building on but going beyond the cited scaling symmetry papers. The linearization step is done well and provides a concrete verification. The soft spot is in the second-order part. The description says the dynamics are non-conservative, but without the explicit equations or expansion shown, it's difficult to see exactly how the dissipative sector cancels or modifies the terms to match standard GR. If extra non-conservative artifacts remain, the equivalence breaks. The construction introduces the dissipative sector specifically to compensate for the scale removal, so one has to check it doesn't alter the physics in unintended ways. The stress-test note flags this as the point needing verification. This paper is for people working on symmetry-based reformulations of gravity or those exploring dissipative effects in classical GR. It could interest readers looking for new angles on conformal geometry in gravity. I think it deserves a serious referee. The core idea is clear and the linear result is reassuring, even if the full equivalence at higher order requires more detail to be fully convincing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper applies prior results on scaling symmetries for singular Lagrangians to the first-order Hilbert action, reformulating its dynamical content using conformal geometry plus a dissipative sector introduced to compensate for scale removal. The abstract explicitly states the linearised equations reduce to the expected free wave equation and notes non-conservative second-order terms, but provides no equations or self-citations that reduce the central claim to a definition, fit, or ansatz by construction. The dissipative sector is presented as required for compensation rather than independently derived, yet without quoted reduction showing the output is forced by inputs alone. The derivation is self-contained against the external benchmark of scaling symmetry applications and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard GR assumptions and prior mathematical results on scaling symmetries for singular Lagrangians, while postulating a dissipative sector without independent falsifiable evidence.

axioms (2)

standard math Scaling symmetries apply to singular Lagrangians as previously derived
Invoked to extend results to first-order GR formulation.
domain assumption The Hilbert action encodes the dynamical content of classical GR
Standard background assumption in general relativity.

invented entities (1)

dissipative sector no independent evidence
purpose: Compensate for elimination of the conformal factor's scale information
Introduced ad hoc in the paper to restore consistency after removing scale.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5438 in / 1505 out tokens · 34819 ms · 2026-05-08T07:31:15.428841+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

[1]

Conformal invariance and the conformal-traceless decomposition of the gravitational field

J David Brown. Conformal invariance and the conformal-traceless decomposition of the gravitational field. Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 71(10):104011, 2005

2005
[2]

James W York Jr. Conformally invariant orthogonal decomposition of symmetric tensors on riemannian manifolds and the initial-value problem of general relativity.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 14(4):456–464, 1973

1973
[3]

Herglotz’generalized variational principle and contact type hamilton-jacobi equations.Trends in control theory and partial differential equations, pages 39–67, 2019

Piermarco Cannarsa, Wei Cheng, Kaizhi Wang, and Jun Yan. Herglotz’generalized variational principle and contact type hamilton-jacobi equations.Trends in control theory and partial differential equations, pages 39–67, 2019

2019
[4]

A variational derivation of the field equations of an action-dependent einstein-hilbert lagrangian.arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13227, 2022

Jordi Gaset and Arnau Mas. A variational derivation of the field equations of an action-dependent einstein-hilbert lagrangian.arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13227, 2022

work page arXiv 2022
[5]

Action principle for action-dependent lagrangians toward nonconservative gravity: Accelerating universe without dark energy.Physical Review D, 95(10):101501, 2017

Matheus J Lazo, Juilson Paiva, Jo˜ ao TS Amaral, and Gast˜ ao SF Frederico. Action principle for action-dependent lagrangians toward nonconservative gravity: Accelerating universe without dark energy.Physical Review D, 95(10):101501, 2017

2017
[6]

Discourse on metaphysics: 1686

Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. Discourse on metaphysics: 1686. InPhilosophical papers and letters, pages 303–330. Springer, 1989

1989
[7]

Dynamical similarity.Physical Review D, 97(12):123541, 2018

David Sloan. Dynamical similarity.Physical Review D, 97(12):123541, 2018

2018
[8]

Scaling symmetries, contact reduction and poincar´ e’s dream.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 56(43):435203, 2023

Alessandro Bravetti, Connor Jackman, and David Sloan. Scaling symmetries, contact reduction and poincar´ e’s dream.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 56(43):435203, 2023

2023
[9]

Dynamical similarity in higher-order classical symplectic systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00498, 2025

Callum Bell and David Sloan. Dynamical similarity in higher-order classical symplectic systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.00498, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Semi-basic 1-forms and helmholtz conditions for the inverse problem of the calculus of variations.arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.1169, 2009

Ioan Bucataru and Matias F Dahl. Semi-basic 1-forms and helmholtz conditions for the inverse problem of the calculus of variations.arXiv preprint arXiv:0903.1169, 2009

work page arXiv 2009
[11]

Pre-multisymplectic constraint algorithm for field theories.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 2(05):839–871, 2005

Manuel De Le´ on, Jes´ us Mar´ ın-Solano, Juan Carlos Marrero, Miguel C Munoz-Lecanda, and Narciso Rom´ an- Roy. Pre-multisymplectic constraint algorithm for field theories.International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 2(05):839–871, 2005. 21

2005
[12]

A geometrical approach to classical field theories: a constraint algorithm for singular theories

Manuel de Le´ on, Jes´ us Marin-Solano, and Juan C Marrero. A geometrical approach to classical field theories: a constraint algorithm for singular theories. InNew Developments in Differential Geometry: Proceedings of the Colloquium on Differential Geometry, Debrecen, Hungary, July 26–30, 1994, pages 291–312. Springer, 1996

1994
[13]

Scale symmetry and friction.Symmetry, 13(9):1639, 2021

David Sloan. Scale symmetry and friction.Symmetry, 13(9):1639, 2021

2021
[14]

Gauge Symmetries, Contact Reduction, and Singular Field Theories

Callum Bell and David Sloan. Gauge Symmetries, Contact Reduction, and Singular Field Theories. 12 2025

2025
[15]

CRC press, 2018

Mikio Nakahara.Geometry, topology and physics. CRC press, 2018

2018
[16]

Cambridge University Press, 2019

Sean M Carroll.Spacetime and geometry. Cambridge University Press, 2019

2019
[17]

World Scientific Publishing Company, 1994

John C Baez and Javier P Muniain.Gauge fields, knots and gravity, volume 4. World Scientific Publishing Company, 1994

1994
[18]

University of Chicago press, 2010

Robert M Wald.General relativity. University of Chicago press, 2010

2010
[19]

Actions for gravity, with generalizations: a title.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11(5):1087, 1994

Peter Peldan. Actions for gravity, with generalizations: a title.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11(5):1087, 1994

1994
[20]

Tate.Lectures on non-perturbative canonical gravity

Abhay Ashtekar and Notes prepared in collaboration with Ranjeet S. Tate.Lectures on non-perturbative canonical gravity. World Scientific, 1991

1991
[21]

The geometry of the solution space of first order hamiltonian field theories iii: Palatini’s formulation of general relativity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15714, 2023

Florio M Ciaglia, Fabio Di Cosmo, Alberto Ibort, Giuseppe Marmo, Luca Schiavone, and Alessandro Zampini. The geometry of the solution space of first order hamiltonian field theories iii: Palatini’s formulation of general relativity.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15714, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[22]

From lagrangian to hamiltonian formulations of the palatini action.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.01416, 2019

SangChul Yoon. From lagrangian to hamiltonian formulations of the palatini action.arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.01416, 2019

work page arXiv 1901
[23]

Cambridge university press, 1984

Roger Penrose and Wolfgang Rindler.Spinors and space-time, volume 1. Cambridge university press, 1984

1984
[24]

New multisymplectic approach to the metric-affine (einstein-palatini) action for gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06181, 2018

Jordi Gaset and Narciso Rom´ an-Roy. New multisymplectic approach to the metric-affine (einstein-palatini) action for gravity.arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06181, 2018

work page arXiv 2018
[25]

Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

Lorenzo Fatibene and Mauro Francaviglia.Natural and gauge natural formalism for classical field theorie: a geometric perspective including spinors and gauge theories. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

2013
[26]

Charles H. T. Wang. Conformal decomposition in canonical general relativity, 2006

2006
[27]

The herglotz variational principle for dissipative field theories.Geometric Mechanics, 1(02):153–178, 2024

Jordi Gaset, Manuel Lainz, Arnau Mas, and Xavier Rivas. The herglotz variational principle for dissipative field theories.Geometric Mechanics, 1(02):153–178, 2024

2024
[28]

Can one tell einstein’s unimodular theory from einstein’s general relativity?Journal of High Energy Physics, 2005(03):002–002, March 2005

Enrique Alvarez. Can one tell einstein’s unimodular theory from einstein’s general relativity?Journal of High Energy Physics, 2005(03):002–002, March 2005

2005
[29]

New action for cosmology.Physical Review D, 103(4):043524, 2021

David Sloan. New action for cosmology.Physical Review D, 103(4):043524, 2021

2021
[30]

Scalar fields and the flrw singularity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(23):235004, 2019

David Sloan. Scalar fields and the flrw singularity.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(23):235004, 2019

2019