arxiv: 2605.06093 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌀 gr-qc · quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Singularity Resolution in Quantum Cosmology via Page-Wootters Formalism

Vishal , Malay K. Nandy

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc quant-ph

keywords quantum cosmologysingularity resolutionPage-Wootters formalismWheeler-DeWitt equationBianchi type-Irelational timeKlein-Gordon equation

0 comments

The pith

In a quantum treatment of a plane-symmetric early universe, conditioning on a relational clock makes the probability of zero volume drop to zero for every clock reading.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the big bang singularity in a Bianchi type-I universe by solving the Wheeler-DeWitt equation with a clock subsystem. It builds an entangled global state from a Gaussian superposition of momentum modes and then extracts conditional probability densities for the remaining degrees of freedom. These densities are required to be consistent with the Klein-Gordon inner product and turn out to vanish whenever the spatial volume reaches zero, regardless of the clock value. A reader would care because the result suggests that quantum entanglement alone can remove the classical point of infinite density without extra boundary conditions or modifications to gravity. The work also derives that the positivity of these densities restricts which clock values are allowed, with the restrictions set by the width and center of the Gaussian packet.

Core claim

Within the Page-Wootters relational framework the conditional probability density for the scale factor, obtained by projecting the global entangled state onto a definite clock reading, vanishes in the zero-volume limit for every admissible clock value. The same density satisfies the Klein-Gordon inner product and remains non-negative only inside a restricted range of clock readings whose boundaries depend on the parameters of the Gaussian wave packet.

What carries the argument

The Page-Wootters conditioning operation that extracts a relational probability density from the entangled solution of the Klein-Gordon-type Wheeler-DeWitt equation by fixing the clock subsystem.

If this is right

The classical singularity is replaced by a region of vanishing probability for every clock reading.
Positivity of the density imposes parameter-dependent bounds on allowed clock values.
Quantum correlations between clock and geometry are required to produce a consistent relational dynamics.
The construction supplies a nonsingular probabilistic description of the entire cosmological history.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same conditioning technique could be applied to other Bianchi models or to isotropic Friedmann universes to test whether zero-volume suppression is generic.
If the Gaussian packet is replaced by a different superposition, the allowed clock ranges would shift, offering a way to explore how initial-state choice affects singularity avoidance.
The vanishing probability at zero volume might translate into a concrete prediction for the earliest observable epoch once a concrete matter content is added.

Load-bearing premise

That the probability density obtained by conditioning the global state on the clock subsystem is the physically correct one and matches the Klein-Gordon inner product.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation of the conditional density at zero volume for the chosen Gaussian superposition in Misner variables; if the density remains finite and positive there, the claimed resolution fails.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06093 by Malay K. Nandy, Vishal.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Conditional probability density p(x; λ, µ) given by (36) for different values of the parameters λ and µ. Graphs in the left (right) column correspond to µ < µmin (µ > µmin) (the lower bounds µmin for different values of λ are shown in view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We investigate the problem of classical big bang singularity in a plane-symmetric Bianchi type-I universe within the Wheeler-DeWitt (WDW) framework of quantum gravity. To address the problem of time, we employ the Page-Wootters formalism, which provides a relational notion of dynamics by conditioning the global state on a clock subsystem. Using Misner variables, the WDW equation assumes a Klein-Gordon (KG) type form. Its general solution is constructed as a Gaussian superposition of momentum eigenstates, resulting in an entangled global state between the clock and the remaining subsystem. Within this relational framework, we construct conditional states and obtain the corresponding probability density consistent with the KG-type inner product. The resulting conditional probability density vanishes in the limit of zero volume for all clock values, indicating quantum resolution of the classical singularity. We further show that positivity of the probability density imposes constraints on the admissible clock values, which depend on the parameters of the Gaussian wavepacket. These results highlight the essential role of quantum correlations in the emergence of relational dynamics, and demonstrate that the Page-Wootters formalism provides a consistent and nonsingular probabilistic description of quantum cosmology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gets a concrete vanishing of conditional probability at zero volume in a plane-symmetric Bianchi I model via Page-Wootters and a Gaussian KG solution, but the indefinite inner product is not shown to produce a reliably positive normalized density.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors reduce the WDW equation for this restricted Bianchi type-I cosmology to Klein-Gordon form, build a Gaussian superposition of momentum modes, entangle it with a clock subsystem, and then condition to obtain a probability density that goes to zero as volume approaches zero for every admissible clock value. That is the explicit outcome they report as evidence of singularity resolution in the relational framework. The Gaussian parameters also set bounds on which clock values keep the density positive. This combination of Page-Wootters conditioning with a specific wave-packet solution in Misner variables is not a standard restatement of earlier work, so the calculation supplies a usable data point for people tracking how relational time behaves in anisotropic models. The setup is laid out clearly enough that the steps from the global state to the conditional density can be followed without excessive effort. The result follows directly from the structure of the superposition once the conditioning is applied, which is a strength of the concrete approach. The soft spot is the inner-product issue the stress-test flags. The KG inner product is indefinite, so extracting a positive probability density normally requires frequency splitting or an equivalent regularization. The paper asserts consistency with the KG inner product and notes the positivity constraints on clock values, yet the provided text does not include explicit verification that the conditional density stays non-negative and integrates to one across the full range of Gaussian widths and clock parameters. If negative pieces appear or normalization drifts for some choices, the vanishing at zero volume remains mathematically true but loses force as a physical resolution. The concern therefore lands on the paper rather than being an artifact of the abstract. This is aimed at quantum cosmologists who already work with relational time and simple minisuperspace models. A reader wanting one more worked example in a plane-symmetric setting can extract value, but the limited symmetry and the unresolved inner-product detail keep it from being essential reading for the wider community. It is worth sending to peer review so referees can check the normalization steps and see whether the positivity constraints are sufficient to make the probability interpretation robust.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper applies the Page-Wootters formalism to resolve the classical big-bang singularity in a plane-symmetric Bianchi type-I universe within the Wheeler-DeWitt framework. Using Misner variables, the WDW equation is cast as a Klein-Gordon equation whose general solution is taken as a Gaussian superposition of momentum eigenstates, producing an entangled global state. Conditional states are constructed by projecting onto clock eigenstates, and the associated probability density is extracted using the KG-type inner product; this density is reported to vanish at zero volume for all admissible clock values, with positivity of the density imposing parameter-dependent constraints on the clock.

Significance. If the conditional probability construction is shown to be normalized, non-negative, and consistent with the indefinite KG inner product, the result would supply a concrete relational mechanism for singularity resolution in quantum cosmology. The explicit Gaussian wave-packet ansatz and the derived clock-value constraints constitute a falsifiable element that could be compared with other relational approaches (e.g., deparametrization or internal-time methods).

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the conditional probability density is 'consistent with the KG-type inner product' and vanishes at zero volume requires an explicit demonstration that the density is non-negative and integrates to unity for the chosen Gaussian superposition. The indefinite character of the KG inner product normally demands a frequency decomposition or equivalent regularization; without this step the vanishing result does not yet establish a physically valid probability measure.
[Construction of conditional states] Construction of conditional states (following the global Gaussian superposition): the projection onto clock eigenstates must be shown to preserve the KG inner-product structure and to yield a clock-independent normalization. The manuscript provides no integral evaluation or parameter scan confirming that normalization holds independently of the Gaussian width and central momentum, which is load-bearing for the singularity-resolution claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The concerns about explicit normalization, non-negativity, and the handling of the indefinite KG inner product are well taken and directly relevant to the physical validity of the relational probability density. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested demonstrations in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the assertion that the conditional probability density is 'consistent with the KG-type inner product' and vanishes at zero volume requires an explicit demonstration that the density is non-negative and integrates to unity for the chosen Gaussian superposition. The indefinite character of the KG inner product normally demands a frequency decomposition or equivalent regularization; without this step the vanishing result does not yet establish a physically valid probability measure.

Authors: We agree that an explicit verification is necessary to confirm the probability interpretation. Our Gaussian superposition is constructed exclusively from positive-frequency momentum eigenstates (with the central momentum chosen positive and the width such that negative-frequency components are negligible), which renders the KG inner product positive definite on the relevant subspace without further decomposition. The conditional density is extracted from the associated bilinear form after projection onto clock eigenstates. While the analytic vanishing at zero volume follows from the Gaussian form, we did not display the full normalization integral in the original text. In the revision we will add an appendix containing the explicit integration over the Misner volume coordinate, demonstrating that the normalization factor is independent of clock time and that the density remains non-negative for the admissible parameter ranges already identified by the positivity constraint. revision: yes
Referee: [Construction of conditional states] Construction of conditional states (following the global Gaussian superposition): the projection onto clock eigenstates must be shown to preserve the KG inner-product structure and to yield a clock-independent normalization. The manuscript provides no integral evaluation or parameter scan confirming that normalization holds independently of the Gaussian width and central momentum, which is load-bearing for the singularity-resolution claim.

Authors: The conditional states are obtained by the standard Page-Wootters projection of the entangled global state onto clock eigenstates, with the probability density subsequently evaluated using the KG inner product on the gravitational sector. The manuscript shows analytically that this density vanishes at zero volume for every admissible clock value. To meet the referee's request we will include, in the revised manuscript, the explicit evaluation of the normalization integral together with a brief parameter scan over Gaussian width and central momentum. This will confirm that the normalization remains clock-independent and that the singularity-resolution result is robust within the positivity constraints on the clock. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; vanishing result follows from KG structure and superposition

full rationale

The derivation constructs a Gaussian superposition solution to the KG-type WDW equation in Misner variables, forms the entangled global state, and extracts conditional probability densities via Page-Wootters conditioning on the clock. The reported vanishing at zero volume is a direct mathematical consequence of the wave-packet form and the KG inner product evaluated on the volume coordinate; it is not imposed by definition or by fitting parameters. Positivity constraints on admissible clock values are derived checks that depend on Gaussian width, not assumptions that force the singularity-resolution claim. No load-bearing self-citations, self-definitional steps, or renamed known results appear in the abstract or described chain. The calculation is self-contained against the stated equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Wheeler-DeWitt quantization of gravity, the validity of the Page-Wootters relational-time construction, and the choice of a Gaussian wave packet whose parameters are not derived from first principles.

free parameters (1)

Gaussian wavepacket parameters
Width, center, and momentum spread of the superposition; these control positivity constraints on admissible clock values.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Wheeler-DeWitt equation provides the correct quantum dynamics for the universe
Invoked as the starting point for the quantum cosmology model.
domain assumption Page-Wootters conditioning yields a consistent probabilistic interpretation
Used to define conditional states and the probability density.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5496 in / 1348 out tokens · 57561 ms · 2026-05-08T07:15:28.819107+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013

Lee Smolin.Time reborn: From the crisis in physics to the future of the universe. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2013

2013
[2]

LD Landau and EM Lifshitz.The classical theory of fields, course of theoretical physics. 1971

1971
[3]

Num- ber 27

Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac.The principles of quantum mechanics. Num- ber 27. Oxford university press, 1981

1981
[4]

S. W. Hawking. Arrow of time in cosmology.Phys. Rev. D, 32:2489–2495, Nov 1985. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.32.2489,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.2489

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.32.2489 1985
[5]

J. A. Wheeler. Relativity groups and topology.In Relativity groups and Topology, 1963 Les Holches Lectures, 1970

1963
[6]

Bryce S. DeWitt. Quantum theory of gravity. i. the canonical theory. Phys. Rev., 160:1113–1148, Aug 1967. URL:https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.160.1113

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 1967
[7]

K. V. Kuchar. Time and interpretations of quantum gravity.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 20:3–86, 2011.doi:10.1142/S0218271811019347

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271811019347 2011
[8]

C. J. Isham. Canonical quantum gravity and the problem of time.NATO Sci. Ser. C, 409:157–287, 1993.arXiv:gr-qc/9210011

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1993
[9]

Robert M. Wald. Quantum gravity and time reversibility.Phys. Rev. D, 21:2742–2755, May 1980. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.21.2742,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.21.2742

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.21.2742 1980
[10]

Time and the interpretation of canonical quantum gravity.Phys

William G. Unruh and Robert M. Wald. Time and the interpretation of canonical quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 40:2598–2614, Oct 1989. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2598,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.40.2598. 20

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.40.2598 1989
[11]

Quantum Mechanics of the Gravitational Field,

Claudio Teitelboim. Quantum mechanics of the gravitational field.Phys. Rev. D, 25:3159–3179, Jun 1982. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.25.3159,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.25.3159

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.25.3159 1982
[12]

The timelessness of quantum gravity: I

Julian B Barbour. The timelessness of quantum gravity: I. the evidence from the classical theory.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 11(12):2853, dec 1994.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/12/005

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/12/005 1994
[13]

Problem of time in quantum gravity.Ann

E. Anderson. Problem of time in quantum gravity.Annalen der Physik, 524(12):757–786, 2012. URL:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ doi/abs/10.1002/andp.201200147,arXiv:https://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/andp.201200147,doi:10.1002/andp. 201200147

work page doi:10.1002/andp.201200147 2012
[14]

Self-adjoint wheeler-dewitt operators, the problem of time, and the wave function of the universe.Phys

Joshua Feinberg and Yoav Peleg. Self-adjoint wheeler-dewitt operators, the problem of time, and the wave function of the universe.Phys. Rev. D, 52:1988–2000, Aug 1995. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevD.52.1988,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.52.1988

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.52.1988 1988
[15]

Kiefer and H

C. Kiefer and H. D. Zeh. Arrow of time in a recollapsing quantum uni- verse.Phys. Rev. D, 51:4145–4153, Apr 1995. URL:https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4145,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 51.4145

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.4145 1995
[16]

Ashtekar and P

Abhay Ashtekar and Parampreet Singh. Loop quantum cosmology: a status report.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 28(21):213001, sep 2011. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/213001

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/28/21/213001 2011
[17]

Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis.Phys

Carlo Rovelli. Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis.Phys. Rev. D, 43:442–456, Jan 1991. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.43.442,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.43.442

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.442 1991
[18]

Relational quantum mechanics

Carlo Rovelli. Relational Quantum Mechanics.International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35(8):1637–1678, August 1996.arXiv:quant-ph/ 9609002,doi:10.1007/BF02302261

work page doi:10.1007/bf02302261 1996
[19]

Relativistic continuous matrix product states for quantum fields without cutoff.Phys

Philipp A. H¨ ohn, Alexander R. H. Smith, and Maximilian P. E. Lock. Trinity of relational quantum dynamics.Phys. Rev. D, 104:066001, 21 Sep 2021. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.104. 066001,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.066001

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104 2021
[20]

Consistent histories and the interpretation of quan- tum mechanics.Journal of Statistical Physics, 36(1):219–272, 1984

Robert B Griffiths. Consistent histories and the interpretation of quan- tum mechanics.Journal of Statistical Physics, 36(1):219–272, 1984. doi:10.1007/BF01015734

work page doi:10.1007/bf01015734 1984
[21]

Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology

Murray Gell-Mann and James B Hartle. Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology. InFoundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology: Selected Papers from the Proceed- ings of the First through Fourth International Symposia on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, pages 347–369. World Scientific, 1996. URL: https://doi.org/10.1142/3268

work page doi:10.1142/3268 1996
[22]

James B. Hartle. Spacetime quantum mechanics and the quantum me- chanics of spacetime, 2014. URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/ 9304006,arXiv:gr-qc/9304006

work page arXiv 2014
[23]

Evolution without evolution: Dynamics described by stationary observables

Don N. Page and William K. Wootters. Evolution without evolu- tion: Dynamics described by stationary observables.Phys. Rev. D, 27:2885–2892, Jun 1983. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.27.2885,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.27.2885

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.27.2885 1983
[24]

Rodolfo Gambini, Rafael A Porto, and Jorge Pullin. A relational solu- tion to the problem of time in quantum mechanics and quantum gravity: a fundamental mechanism for quantum decoherence.New Journal of Physics, 6(1):45, apr 2004.doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/045

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/045 2004
[25]

Holographic ricci dark energy: Current observational con- straints, quintom feature, and the reconstruction of scalar-field dark en- ergy.Phys

Rodolfo Gambini, Rafael A. Porto, Jorge Pullin, and Sebasti´ an Torterolo. Conditional probabilities with dirac observables and the problem of time in quantum gravity.Phys. Rev. D, 79:041501, Feb 2009. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.79. 041501,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.041501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79 2009
[26]

Quantum time.Phys

Vittorio Giovannetti, Seth Lloyd, and Lorenzo Maccone. Quantum time.Phys. Rev. D, 92:045033, Aug 2015. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.045033,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92. 045033. 22

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.045033 2015
[27]

Evolution without evolution and without ambiguities,

C. Marletto and V. Vedral. Evolution without evolution and without am- biguities.Phys. Rev. D, 95:043510, Feb 2017. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.043510,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95. 043510

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.043510 2017
[28]

¨Uber die kr¨ ummung des raumes.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik, 10(1):377–386, 1922

Alexander Friedman. ¨Uber die kr¨ ummung des raumes.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik, 10(1):377–386, 1922

1922
[29]

Lemaˆ ıtre

G. Lemaˆ ıtre. Un Univers homog` ene de masse constante et de rayon croissant rendant compte de la vitesse radiale des n´ ebuleuses extra- galactiques.Annales de la Soci´ et´ e Scientifique de Bruxelles, 47:49–59, January 1927

1927
[30]

H. P. Robertson. Kinematics and World-Structure.Astrophysical Jour- nal, 82:284, November 1935.doi:10.1086/143681

work page doi:10.1086/143681 1935
[31]

A. G. Walker. On milne’s theory of world-structure.Proceed- ings of the London Mathematical Society, s2-42(1):90–127, 1937. URL:https://londmathsoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90,arXiv:https://londmathsoc. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90, doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90

work page doi:10.1112/plms/s2-42.1.90 1937
[32]

Ryan and Lawrence C

Michael P. Ryan and Lawrence C. Shepley.Homogeneous Relativistic Cosmologies. Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1975

1975
[33]

G. F. R. Ellis. The Bianchi models: Then and now.General Rel- ativity and Gravitation, 38(6):1003–1015, June 2006.doi:10.1007/ s10714-006-0283-4

2006
[34]

Charles W. Misner. Quantum cosmology. i.Phys. Rev., 186:1319–1327, Oct 1969. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.186. 1319,doi:10.1103/PhysRev.186.1319

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.186 1969
[35]

J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking. Wave function of the universe.Phys. Rev. D, 28:2960–2975, Dec 1983. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2960,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2960. 23

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2960 1983
[36]

Singularity avoid- ance in Bianchi I quantum cosmology.Eur

Claus Kiefer, Nick Kwidzinski, and Dennis Piontek. Singularity avoid- ance in Bianchi I quantum cosmology.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(8):686, 2019. arXiv:1903.04391,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7193-6

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7193-6 2019
[37]

Reso- lution of type iv singularities in quantum cosmology.Phys

Mariam Bouhmadi-L´ opez, Claus Kiefer, and Manuel Kr¨ amer. Reso- lution of type iv singularities in quantum cosmology.Phys. Rev. D, 89:064016, Mar 2014. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevD.89.064016,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064016

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.89.064016 2014
[38]

Absence of a singularity in loop quantum cos- mology.Phys

Martin Bojowald. Absence of a singularity in loop quantum cos- mology.Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:5227–5230, Jun 2001. URL:https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5227,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.86.5227

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5227 2001
[39]

Quantum nature of the big bang.Phys

Abhay Ashtekar, Tomasz Pawlowski, and Parampreet Singh. Quantum nature of the big bang.Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:141301, Apr 2006. URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.141301,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.141301

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.141301 2006
[40]

Sebastian Gemsheim and Jan M. Rost. Emergence of time from quantum interaction with the environment.Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:140202, Oct
[41]

140202,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.140202

URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131. 140202,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.140202

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131
[42]

Measuring time in a timeless uni- verse.Phys

Sam Kuypers and Simone Rijavec. Measuring time in a timeless uni- verse.Phys. Rev. D, 112:063544, Sep 2025. URL:https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/qfns-48vq,doi:10.1103/qfns-48vq

work page doi:10.1103/qfns-48vq 2025
[43]

Robustness of the page-wootters construction across different pictures, states of the universe, and system-clock inter- actions.Phys

Simone Rijavec. Robustness of the page-wootters construction across different pictures, states of the universe, and system-clock inter- actions.Phys. Rev. D, 108:063507, Sep 2023. URL:https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.063507,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.063507

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.063507 2023
[44]

Relative state

Hugh Everett. ”relative state” formulation of quantum mechanics.Rev. Mod. Phys., 29:454–462, Jul 1957. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454,doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454. 24

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.454 1957
[45]

George F. R. Ellis and Henk van Elst. Cosmological models: Cargese lec- tures 1998.NATO Sci. Ser. C, 541:1–116, 1999.arXiv:gr-qc/9812046, doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4455-1_1

work page doi:10.1007/978-94-011-4455-1_1 1998
[46]

Magic without magic.edited by, J

CW Misner. Magic without magic.edited by, J. Klauder, Freeman, San Francisco, page 441, 1972

1972
[47]

Time from quantum entanglement: An experimental illustration.Phys

Ekaterina Moreva, Giorgio Brida, Marco Gramegna, Vittorio Giovan- netti, Lorenzo Maccone, and Marco Genovese. Time from quantum entanglement: An experimental illustration.Phys. Rev. A, 89:052122, May 2014. URL:https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.89. 052122,doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.052122. 25

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89 2014