arxiv: 2605.06271 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-ph · nucl-th

A Comparative Study of Mass Extraction Schemes and π^pm-rho^pm Mixing

Ziyue Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph nucl-th

keywords NJL modelpion-rho mixingmagnetic fieldlattice QCDmass extraction schemescharged mesonsLandau levelsquasiparticle mixing

0 comments

The pith

The non-monotonic magnetic-field dependence of the lowest charged pion mode on the lattice arises from genuine mixing with the rho meson, but only when the pole is extracted using direct determinant or near-pole methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines why lattice QCD shows a non-monotonic dependence on magnetic field strength for the lowest charged pion excitation. In a magnetic field the charged pion mixes with the longitudinally polarized charged rho meson because they share the same quantum numbers. The authors implement the SU(2)_f Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with a gauge-invariant tree-level mixing operator whose strength is fixed by the measured rho to pion photon decay width. They test four mass-extraction schemes and find that rest-mass reconstruction misses the turnover entirely while the local derivative scheme produces only a weak effect at very large fields. Direct determinant solving with Landau projection and near-pole expansion both reproduce a robust non-monotonic lowest mode, indicating that the lattice observation reflects real quasiparticle mixing whose visibility depends on how the pole is isolated.

Core claim

In the SU(2)_f NJL model supplemented by a gauge-invariant tree-level π-ρ mixing operator constrained by the experimental ρ±→π±γ decay width, the charged pion and longitudinally polarized rho meson mix in a magnetic field. Four mass-extraction schemes are compared: rest-mass reconstruction cannot reproduce the lattice-type turnover; local bosonization shows a weak turnover that appears only at large magnetic field; direct determinant solving with Landau projection and near-pole expansion both retain a robust non-monotonic lowest mode. The direct method is most faithful to the Landau-level kinematics of the charged excitation, while the near-pole scheme shows that residue suppression enhances

What carries the argument

Gauge-invariant tree-level π-ρ mixing operator in the SU(2)_f NJL model, strength fixed by the ρ±→π±γ decay width, used to compare four pole-extraction schemes under magnetic field.

Load-bearing premise

The tree-level gauge-invariant π-ρ mixing operator in the SU(2)_f NJL model, with strength fixed solely by the experimental ρ±→π±γ decay width, sufficiently captures the dynamics without needing higher-order corrections or additional parameters when magnetic fields are present.

What would settle it

A lattice computation that extracts the lowest charged pion pole using the rest-mass reconstruction scheme and still finds the non-monotonic turnover would falsify the claim that the behavior is an artifact of the extraction method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06271 by Ziyue Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1: Rest-mass extraction. Solid lines show the unmixed charged-pion rest mass and the lower mixed rest-mass view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Local bosonized extraction without mixing. The solid lines show the unmixed LLL energies of the pion and view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Local bosonized coefficients as functions of the magnetic field. Left panel: longitudinal and transverse wave view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Lower mixed eigenmode in the local bosonized scheme. The red solid line shows the lower eigenvalue view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Direct determinant extraction with Landau projection. Left panel: unmixed pion and longitudinal rho view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6: Near-pole wave-function renormalization factors extracted from the slopes of the Landau-projected diagonal view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7: Mixing strength in the near-pole scheme. Left panel: loop-induced coefficient view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8: Lower mixed eigenmode in the near-pole quasiparticle scheme. The dashed blue line shows the unmixed pion view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9: Unmixed charged-pion LLL energy obtained from different extraction schemes. The rest-mass and local view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10: Comparison of the lower mixed eigenmode obtained from the four extraction schemes: rest-mass reconstruc view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We study the origin of the non-monotonic magnetic-field dependence of the lowest charged pion excitation observed in lattice QCD. In a magnetic field, the charged pion mixes with the longitudinally polarized charged rho meson, which shares the same quantum numbers. Within the SU(2)$_f$ Nambu--Jona-Lasinio model supplemented by a gauge invariant tree-level $\pi-\rho$ mixing operator constrained by the experimental $\rho^\pm\rightarrow\pi^\pm\gamma$ decay width, we compare four mass-extraction schemes: rest-mass reconstruction, local bosonization, direct determinant solving with Landau projection, and near-pole expansion. The rest-mass scheme cannot reproduce the lattice-type turnover, while in the local derivative-expansion scheme the turnover presence but is weak which occurs at large magnetic field. By contrast, the direct determinant and near-pole schemes both retain a robust non-monotonic lowest mode. The former is most faithful to the Landau-level kinematics of the charged excitation, while the latter most clearly shows that residue suppression enhances the effective mixing after canonical normalization. Our results indicate that the lattice behavior is a genuine quasiparticle mixing effect, but one whose robustness depends crucially on how the charged-meson pole structure is extracted in a magnetic field.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows that only the direct-determinant and near-pole schemes reproduce the lattice non-monotonic pion mass in the NJL model, while simpler schemes miss it due to how they handle mixing and Landau levels.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the non-monotonic magnetic-field dependence of the lowest charged pion mode seen on the lattice comes from π-ρ mixing, but only the direct-determinant and near-pole extraction methods capture it robustly inside the SU(2) NJL model. Rest-mass reconstruction misses the turnover entirely, and the local bosonization scheme shows it only weakly and at large fields. The near-pole approach makes the residue suppression after normalization explicit, while the direct method respects the Landau-level structure of the charged states. That comparison is the concrete new piece relative to earlier work on the same mixing operator. The mixing strength is fixed once by the vacuum ρ± → π±γ width, so the turnover is not tuned in. Within the model the central claim holds: the lattice behavior is a genuine quasiparticle effect whose visibility depends on the pole-extraction procedure. The paper does a clean job laying out why the two faithful schemes succeed where the others do not. The main soft spot is the tree-level gauge-invariant mixing operator itself. Strong fields can in principle generate higher-order corrections or renormalize the vertex through the charged propagators, and those are not included. If such effects matter at the fields where the turnover appears, the robustness seen in the two schemes could shift. The abstract and setup give no indication that this is explored, so the result stays model-dependent in the usual effective-theory sense. No obvious circularity or post-hoc fitting is present. This is for the small group working on QCD in external magnetic fields, especially lattice groups that need to decide which mass-extraction method to trust for charged mesons. It is worth sending for peer review. The scheme comparison is specific and falsifiable enough to justify referee time, even if the model truncation needs clearer caveats in revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the non-monotonic magnetic-field dependence of the lowest charged pion excitation seen in lattice QCD arises from quasiparticle mixing with the longitudinally polarized charged rho meson. Within the SU(2)_f NJL model, a gauge-invariant tree-level π-ρ mixing operator is added with strength fixed solely by the experimental ρ±→π±γ decay width. Four mass-extraction schemes are compared: rest-mass reconstruction, local bosonization, direct determinant solving with Landau projection, and near-pole expansion. Only the direct-determinant and near-pole schemes reproduce a robust turnover; the former respects Landau-level kinematics while the latter illustrates residue suppression after canonical normalization. The authors conclude that the lattice behavior is a genuine mixing effect whose visibility depends on the chosen pole-extraction method.

Significance. If the central comparison holds, the work supplies a concrete model explanation for an otherwise puzzling lattice feature and demonstrates that mass-extraction methodology can qualitatively alter the inferred physics of charged mesons in strong fields. The experimentally constrained mixing term is a positive feature, yielding a parameter-free prediction inside the model for the location and strength of the turnover. The study therefore offers guidance for future lattice analyses and highlights the diagnostic power of comparing multiple extraction schemes.

major comments (2)

[§3 (model definition)] §3 (model definition) and the abstract: the claim that the lattice turnover is a 'genuine quasiparticle mixing effect' rests on the tree-level gauge-invariant π-ρ operator (strength fixed by vacuum ρ→πγ width) remaining adequate once Landau levels are present. Strong eB can generate effective higher-order operators or renormalize the mixing vertex through charged-meson propagators; neither effect is included. If these corrections modify the residue or pole trajectory, the turnover seen in the two faithful schemes could be an artifact of the truncation rather than a robust feature.
[Results section] Results section (comparison of schemes): the manuscript reports only qualitative outcomes (presence or absence of turnover) without tabulated pole positions, magnetic-field values at which the minimum occurs, or direct numerical overlay against lattice data points. This absence of quantitative metrics and error analysis makes it difficult to judge how faithfully the model reproduces the lattice non-monotonicity beyond the mere existence of a turnover.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract, sentence on local bosonization: 'the turnover presence but is weak which occurs at large magnetic field' is grammatically incomplete and should be rephrased for clarity.
[Figures and notation] Figure captions and text: ensure uniform notation for the magnetic-field strength (eB versus B) and for the mixing parameter throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and presentation of our results. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the suggestions where they strengthen the work without altering its core conclusions.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3 (model definition)] §3 (model definition) and the abstract: the claim that the lattice turnover is a 'genuine quasiparticle mixing effect' rests on the tree-level gauge-invariant π-ρ operator (strength fixed by vacuum ρ→πγ width) remaining adequate once Landau levels are present. Strong eB can generate effective higher-order operators or renormalize the mixing vertex through charged-meson propagators; neither effect is included. If these corrections modify the residue or pole trajectory, the turnover seen in the two faithful schemes could be an artifact of the truncation rather than a robust feature.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's point that strong magnetic fields could in principle induce higher-order corrections to the mixing vertex or renormalize it via charged-meson loops. Our approach employs the minimal gauge-invariant tree-level operator whose strength is fixed solely by the vacuum decay width, as this constitutes the leading contribution in the effective theory. Within the NJL model, higher-order effects are suppressed in the large-Nc counting that underlies the model. We have revised Section 3 to include an explicit discussion of this truncation, noting that the turnover remains a robust feature of the quasiparticle mixing under the adopted approximations and that the study provides a concrete model explanation rather than a complete QCD calculation. This addition clarifies the scope without changing the reported results. revision: yes
Referee: [Results section] Results section (comparison of schemes): the manuscript reports only qualitative outcomes (presence or absence of turnover) without tabulated pole positions, magnetic-field values at which the minimum occurs, or direct numerical overlay against lattice data points. This absence of quantitative metrics and error analysis makes it difficult to judge how faithfully the model reproduces the lattice non-monotonicity beyond the mere existence of a turnover.

Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics would allow a more precise evaluation of the model's agreement with lattice data. In the revised manuscript we have added a table in the Results section that lists the extracted pole positions of the lowest charged pion mode for several values of eB in both the direct-determinant and near-pole schemes. The table also reports the magnetic-field strength at which the minimum occurs. In addition, we have included a new figure that overlays the model curves with available lattice data points. These additions provide the requested quantitative comparison while preserving the parameter-free nature of the prediction based on the experimental mixing strength. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; mixing strength fixed externally by experiment

full rationale

The paper constrains the tree-level π-ρ mixing operator strength solely by the independent experimental ρ±→π±γ decay width, then compares four mass-extraction schemes inside the standard SU(2)_f NJL model against external lattice QCD data. No equation reduces the non-monotonic turnover or the 'genuine quasiparticle mixing' conclusion to a fitted parameter defined by the target claim itself. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks (lattice results and decay width), with no self-definitional steps, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the NJL model plus a specific mixing term being an adequate description of the relevant QCD dynamics in a magnetic field.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The SU(2)_f Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model supplemented by a gauge-invariant tree-level π-ρ mixing operator captures the essential low-energy dynamics of charged pions and rhos in a magnetic field.
Invoked throughout the model setup and comparison of extraction schemes.
domain assumption The strength of the mixing operator can be fixed by the experimental ρ±→π±γ decay width without additional free parameters.
Used to constrain the operator before comparing mass schemes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5517 in / 1537 out tokens · 51170 ms · 2026-05-08T08:21:26.401956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

[1]

Rubinstein

Dario Grasso and Hector R. Rubinstein. Magnetic fields in the early universe.Phys. Rept., 348:163–266, 2001. 26

2001
[2]

Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation.Astron

Ruth Durrer and Andrii Neronov. Cosmological Magnetic Fields: Their Generation, Evolution and Observation.Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 21:62, 2013

2013
[3]

Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers.Phys

Kenta Kiuchi, Pablo Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, Koutarou Kyutoku, Yuichiro Sekiguchi, and Masaru Shibata. Efficient magnetic-field amplification due to the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in binary neutron star mergers.Phys. Rev. D, 92(12):124034, 2015

2015
[4]

Skokov, A

V. Skokov, A. Yu. Illarionov, and V. Toneev. Estimate of the magnetic field strength in heavy-ion collisions.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 24:5925–5932, 2009

2009
[5]

Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions.Phys

Wei-Tian Deng and Xu-Guang Huang. Event-by-event generation of electromagnetic fields in heavy-ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 85:044907, 2012

2012
[6]

Kharzeev, Larry D

Dmitri E. Kharzeev, Larry D. McLerran, and Harmen J. Warringa. The Effects of topological charge change in heavy ion collisions: ’Event by event P and CP violation’.Nucl. Phys. A, 803:227–253, 2008

2008
[7]

Kharzeev and Dam T

Dmitri E. Kharzeev and Dam T. Son. Testing the chiral magnetic and chiral vortical effects in heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:062301, 2011

2011
[8]

Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion collisions.Phys

Umut Gursoy, Dmitri Kharzeev, and Krishna Rajagopal. Magnetohydrodynamics, charged currents and directed flow in heavy ion collisions.Phys. Rev. C, 89(5):054905, 2014

2014
[9]

V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, and I. A. Shovkovy. Dimensional reduction and catalysis of dynamical symmetry breaking by a magnetic field.Nucl. Phys. B, 462:249–290, 1996

1996
[10]

Kharzeev and Ho-Ung Yee

Dmitri E. Kharzeev and Ho-Ung Yee. Chiral Magnetic Wave.Phys. Rev. D, 83:085007, 2011

2011
[11]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, and A. Schafer. QCD quark condensate in external magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. D, 86:071502, 2012

2012
[12]

Phase structure of three flavor QCD in external magnetic fields using HISQ fermions.PoS, LATTICE2018:163, 2019

Akio Tomiya, Heng-Tong Ding, Xiao-Dan Wang, Yu Zhang, Swagato Mukherjee, and Christian Schmidt. Phase structure of three flavor QCD in external magnetic fields using HISQ fermions.PoS, LATTICE2018:163, 2019

2019
[13]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endr¨ odi, S. D. Katz, and A. Sch¨ afer. The QCD equation of state in background magnetic fields.JHEP, 08:177, 2014

2014
[14]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, M. Constantinou, M. Costa, G. Endrodi, S. D. Katz, H. Panagopoulos, and A. Schafer. Magnetic susceptibility of QCD at zero and at finite temperature from the lattice.Phys. Rev. D, 86:094512, 2012

2012
[15]

Miransky and Igor A

Vladimir A. Miransky and Igor A. Shovkovy. Quantum field theory in a magnetic field: From quantum chromodynamics to graphene and Dirac semimetals.Phys. Rept., 576:1–209, 2015

2015
[16]

Magnetic Catalysis Versus Magnetic Inhibition.Phys

Kenji Fukushima and Yoshimasa Hidaka. Magnetic Catalysis Versus Magnetic Inhibition.Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(3):031601, 2013

2013
[17]

Andersen, William R

Jens O. Andersen, William R. Naylor, and Anders Tranberg. Phase diagram of QCD in a magnetic field: A review.Rev. Mod. Phys., 88:025001, 2016

2016
[18]

G. S. Bali, F. Bruckmann, G. Endrodi, Z. Fodor, S. D. Katz, S. Krieg, A. Schafer, and K. K. Szabo. The QCD phase diagram for external magnetic fields.JHEP, 02:044, 2012

2012
[19]

E. M. Ilgenfritz, M. Muller-Preussker, B. Petersson, and A. Schreiber. Magnetic catalysis (and inverse catalysis) at finite temperature in two-color lattice QCD.Phys. Rev. D, 89(5):054512, 2014

2014
[20]

H. T. Ding, S. T. Li, A. Tomiya, X. D. Wang, and Y. Zhang. Chiral properties of (2+1)-flavor QCD in strong magnetic fields at zero temperature.Phys. Rev. D, 104(1):014505, 2021

2021
[21]

Meson masses in external magnetic fields with HISQ fermions.PoS, LATTICE2019:250, 2020

Heng-Tong Ding, Sheng-Tai Li, Swagato Mukherjee, Akio Tomiya, and Xiao-Dan Wang. Meson masses in external magnetic fields with HISQ fermions.PoS, LATTICE2019:250, 2020

2020
[22]

Chiral Properties of (2+1)-Flavor QCD in Magnetic Fields at Zero Temperature

Heng-Tong Ding and Dan Zhang. Chiral Properties of (2+1)-Flavor QCD in Magnetic Fields at Zero Temperature. 1 2026

2026
[23]

Four fermion interaction model in a constant magnetic field at finite temperature and chemical potential.Prog

Tomohiro Inagaki, Daiji Kimura, and Tsukasa Murata. Four fermion interaction model in a constant magnetic field at finite temperature and chemical potential.Prog. Theor. Phys., 111:371–386, 2004

2004
[24]

Inverse Magnetic Catalysis in the three-flavor NJL model with axial-vector interaction.Phys

Lang Yu, Jos Van Doorsselaere, and Mei Huang. Inverse Magnetic Catalysis in the three-flavor NJL model with axial-vector interaction.Phys. Rev. D, 91(7):074011, 2015

2015
[25]

Fayazbakhsh and N

Sh. Fayazbakhsh and N. Sadooghi. Anomalous magnetic moment of hot quarks, inverse magnetic catalysis, and reentrance of the chiral symmetry broken phase.Phys. Rev. D, 90(10):105030, 2014

2014
[26]

Coppola, D

M. Coppola, D. G´ omez Dumm, and N. N. Scoccola. Charged pion masses under strong magnetic fields in the NJL model. Phys. Lett. B, 782:155–161, 2018

2018
[27]

Coppola, D

M. Coppola, D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola. Neutral and charged pion properties under strong magnetic fields in the NJL model.Phys. Rev. D, 100(5):054014, 2019

2019
[28]

Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the phase structure and mesonic properties in the NJL model.Phys

Nilanjan Chaudhuri, Snigdha Ghosh, Sourav Sarkar, and Pradip Roy. Effect of the anomalous magnetic moment of quarks on the phase structure and mesonic properties in the NJL model.Phys. Rev. D, 99(11):116025, 2019

2019
[29]

Chiral dynamics in a magnetic field from the functional renormalization group.JHEP, 03:009, 2014

Kazuhiko Kamikado and Takuya Kanazawa. Chiral dynamics in a magnetic field from the functional renormalization group.JHEP, 03:009, 2014

2014
[30]

Kiminad A. Mamo. Inverse magnetic catalysis in holographic models of QCD.JHEP, 05:121, 2015

2015
[31]

Inverse Magnetic Catalysis in the Soft-Wall Model of AdS/QCD

Danning Li, Mei Huang, Yi Yang, and Pei-Hung Yuan. Inverse Magnetic Catalysis in the Soft-Wall Model of AdS/QCD. JHEP, 02:030, 2017

2017
[32]

Charged and neutral vectorρmesons in a magnetic field.Phys

Hao Liu, Lang Yu, and Mei Huang. Charged and neutral vectorρmesons in a magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 91(1):014017, 2015

2015
[33]

Spectral properties ofρmeson in a magnetic field.Phys

Snigdha Ghosh, Arghya Mukherjee, Mahatsab Mandal, Sourav Sarkar, and Pradip Roy. Spectral properties ofρmeson in a magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 94(9):094043, 2016

2016
[34]

Vector meson masses from a hidden local symmetry in a constant magnetic field.Phys

Mamiya Kawaguchi and Shinya Matsuzaki. Vector meson masses from a hidden local symmetry in a constant magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 93(12):125027, 2016

2016
[35]

Avancini, M´ aximo Coppola, Norberto N

Sidney S. Avancini, M´ aximo Coppola, Norberto N. Scoccola, and Joana C. Sodr´ e. Light pseudoscalar meson masses under 27 strong magnetic fields within the SU(3) Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model.Phys. Rev. D, 104(9):094040, 2021

2021
[36]

J. P. Carlomagno, D. Gomez Dumm, M. F. Izzo Villafa˜ ne, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola. Charged pseudoscalar and vector meson masses in strong magnetic fields in an extended NJL model.Phys. Rev. D, 106(9):094035, 2022

2022
[37]

Scoccola

M´ aximo Coppola, Daniel Gomez Dumm, Santiago Noguera, and Norberto N. Scoccola. Masses of magnetized pseudoscalar and vector mesons in an extended NJL model: The role of axial vector mesons.Phys. Rev. D, 109(5):054014, 2024

2024
[38]

Functional renormalization group study of neutral and charged pions in magnetic fields in the quark-meson model.Phys

Rui Wen, Shi Yin, Wei-jie Fu, and Mei Huang. Functional renormalization group study of neutral and charged pions in magnetic fields in the quark-meson model.Phys. Rev. D, 108(7):076020, 2023

2023
[39]

Inverse magnetic catalysis effect and current quark mass effect on mass spectra and Mott transitions of pions under external magnetic field.Phys

Luyang Li and Shijun Mao. Inverse magnetic catalysis effect and current quark mass effect on mass spectra and Mott transitions of pions under external magnetic field.Phys. Rev. D, 108(5):054001, 2023

2023
[40]

Residue-Enhanced Pion-Rho Mixing as the Origin of Nonmonotonic Charged Pion Mass in Magnetic Fields

Ziyue Wang. Residue-Enhanced Pion-Rho Mixing as the Origin of Nonmonotonic Charged Pion Mass in Magnetic Fields. 2 2026

2026
[41]

S. P. Klevansky. The Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model of quantum chromodynamics.Rev. Mod. Phys., 64:649–708, 1992

1992
[42]

QCD phenomenology based on a chiral effective Lagrangian.Phys

Tetsuo Hatsuda and Teiji Kunihiro. QCD phenomenology based on a chiral effective Lagrangian.Phys. Rept., 247:221–367, 1994

1994
[43]

Avancini, Ricardo L

Sidney S. Avancini, Ricardo L. S. Farias, William R. Tavares, and Varese S. Tim´ oteo. Magnetized pole-mass of neutralρ meson within full RPA evaluation.Nucl. Phys. B, 981:115862, 2022

2022
[44]

Meson properties in magnetized quark matter.Phys

Ziyue Wang and Pengfei Zhuang. Meson properties in magnetized quark matter.Phys. Rev. D, 97(3):034026, 2018

2018
[45]

Gauge independence of pion masses in a magnetic field within the Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model.Phys

Jianing Li, Gaoqing Cao, and Lianyi He. Gauge independence of pion masses in a magnetic field within the Nambu–Jona- Lasinio model.Phys. Rev. D, 104(7):074026, 2021

2021
[46]

Gomez Dumm, S

D. Gomez Dumm, S. Noguera, and N. N. Scoccola. Charged meson masses under strong magnetic fields: Gauge invariance and Schwinger phases.Phys. Rev. D, 108(1):016012, 2023

2023
[47]

Zhen-Ni Xu, Zhao-Qian Yao, Si-Xue Qin, Zhu-Fang Cui, and Craig D. Roberts. Bethe–Salpeter kernel and properties of strange-quark mesons.Eur. Phys. J. A, 59(3):39, 2023

2023
[48]

Effective field theory of particle mixing.Phys

Shuyang Cao and Daniel Boyanovsky. Effective field theory of particle mixing.Phys. Rev. D, 109(3):036038, 2024

2024
[49]

Vogl and W

U. Vogl and W. Weise. The Nambu and Jona Lasinio model: Its implications for hadrons and nuclei.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., 27:195–272, 1991

1991
[50]

Schwinger

Julian S. Schwinger. On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization.Phys. Rev., 82:664–679, 1951

1951