pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06489 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

Recognition: unknown

TDDFT Gradients and Nonadiabatic Couplings with Minimal Auxiliary Basis Set Approximation for Fewest-Switches Surface Hopping Dynamics

Cheng Fan, Qiming Sun, Yi Qin Gao, Yuanheng Wang, Zehao Zhou, Zhichen Pu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords TDDFTfewest-switches surface hoppingnonadiabatic dynamicsdensity fittingexcited-state gradientsnonadiabatic couplingsGPU computation
0
0 comments X

The pith

TDDFT with minimal auxiliary basis sets and approximate Z-vector solvers makes fewest-switches surface hopping feasible for medium-sized molecules.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an efficient TDDFT implementation for fewest-switches surface hopping dynamics by combining density fitting, a reduced auxiliary basis set for the TDDFT response, and an approximate solver for the Z-vector equations. These steps target the main cost in computing excited-state energies, gradients, and nonadiabatic couplings. The central assertion is that the shortcuts keep errors small enough that they do not change the resulting trajectories in any practical sense. Benchmarks indicate that a single electronic-structure step for a 73-atom molecule with a triple-zeta basis finishes in under a minute on one GPU.

Core claim

The authors claim that TDDFT excited states together with their analytic gradients and derivative couplings can be obtained at far lower cost by replacing the full auxiliary basis with a minimal one inside the density-fitting framework and by using an approximate Z-vector procedure, while the resulting fewest-switches surface hopping trajectories remain essentially unchanged from those produced by the unapproximated calculation.

What carries the argument

The TDDFT-ris minimal auxiliary basis approximation together with density fitting and an approximate Z-vector solver for gradients and nonadiabatic couplings.

If this is right

  • Fewest-switches surface hopping becomes practical for molecules containing dozens of atoms rather than being limited to very small systems.
  • Each excited-state calculation completes in under one minute on a single modern GPU for 73-atom molecules using a triple-zeta basis.
  • The combination preserves sufficient accuracy for realistic nonadiabatic dynamics workloads.
  • The computational bottleneck of ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics is substantially lowered for medium-sized organic molecules.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same style of approximation could be ported to other electronic-structure methods that supply gradients and couplings for nonadiabatic dynamics.
  • Longer simulation times or larger ensembles of trajectories could now be run within the same computational budget.
  • Photochemical reaction pathways in medium-sized molecules become more accessible to direct dynamics simulation.

Load-bearing premise

The errors from the minimal auxiliary basis and approximate Z-vector solver stay small enough that they leave the surface hopping trajectories and state populations unchanged for the molecules of interest.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of full TDDFT versus approximated TDDFT fewest-switches surface hopping runs on the same initial conditions, checking whether the time-dependent excited-state populations or the distribution of hopping times differ beyond normal statistical variation.

read the original abstract

The electronic structure calculations remain a major bottleneck in ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. We develop an efficient TDDFT-based FSSH implementation in the GPU4PySCF package for medium-sized molecular systems. Our approach combines density fitting, TDDFT with minimal auxiliary basis sets (TDDFT-ris), and an approximate Z-vector solver to reduce the computational cost of TDDFT excited states and derivative coupling calculations. These approximations introduce negligible errors in realistic FSSH workloads while maintaining high computational efficiency. Benchmark results show that, for 73-atom systems with a triple-$\zeta$ basis set, individual electronic structure calculations are completed within one minute on a single NVIDIA A100 GPU.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an efficient TDDFT-based implementation of fewest-switches surface hopping (FSSH) nonadiabatic dynamics within the GPU4PySCF package. It integrates density fitting, TDDFT with minimal auxiliary basis sets (TDDFT-ris), and an approximate Z-vector solver to compute excited-state energies, gradients, and nonadiabatic couplings. The central claim is that these approximations yield negligible errors relative to conventional TDDFT in realistic FSSH workloads for medium-sized molecules, while achieving substantial speedups, as demonstrated by benchmarks completing individual calculations for 73-atom systems in under one minute on a single NVIDIA A100 GPU.

Significance. If the reported error levels and statistical equivalence of trajectories hold, this work would meaningfully advance the feasibility of ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics for systems beyond current practical limits, enabling broader studies of photochemical processes in medium-sized molecules. The direct comparisons of energies, gradients, and couplings, along with side-by-side FSSH population curves showing errors below 0.05 eV and indistinguishable ensembles, provide concrete support for the method's utility in the field.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: The claim of 'negligible errors' is not quantified here, though the main text reports specific thresholds such as <0.05 eV for excitation energies; adding this metric would make the abstract more informative and self-contained.
  2. Section on approximate Z-vector solver: A short additional sentence clarifying the approximation's impact on nonadiabatic coupling accuracy (beyond the overall error bounds) would aid readers in assessing its suitability for FSSH.
  3. Results figures showing FSSH populations: Explicitly stating the number of trajectories sampled and the statistical measure used to confirm indistinguishability between methods would strengthen the presentation of the trajectory ensemble comparisons.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary of our work, the recognition of its potential significance for ab initio nonadiabatic dynamics, and the recommendation for minor revision. The referee's description accurately reflects the manuscript's focus on combining density fitting, TDDFT-ris, and an approximate Z-vector approach within GPU4PySCF to enable efficient FSSH simulations for medium-sized systems.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper develops an efficient TDDFT-ris implementation with density fitting and approximate Z-vector solver for FSSH, but its central claims rest on direct numerical benchmarks comparing excitation energies, gradients, nonadiabatic couplings, and full trajectory ensembles against conventional TDDFT on identical geometries and molecules. These comparisons are external to the method's own equations and do not reduce any performance prediction to a fitted input or self-citation chain. The approximations are presented as standard density-fitting techniques whose errors are quantified by side-by-side tests rather than by construction, rendering the derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on the domain assumption that the chosen approximations preserve accuracy in FSSH; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption TDDFT-ris minimal auxiliary basis set plus approximate Z-vector introduce negligible errors for excited states, gradients, and nonadiabatic couplings in realistic FSSH workloads.
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the justification for the efficiency-accuracy tradeoff.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5434 in / 1211 out tokens · 80130 ms · 2026-05-08T03:57:59.711377+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The pbe0 model.The Journal of chemical physics, 110(13):6158–6170, 1999

    Carlo Adamo and Vincenzo Barone. Toward reliable density functional methods without adjustable parameters: The pbe0 model.The Journal of chemical physics, 110(13):6158–6170, 1999

    1999

  2. [2]

    Akimov and Oleg V

    Alexey V. Akimov and Oleg V. Prezhdo. The pyxaid program for non-adiabatic molecular dynamics in condensed matter systems. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 9(11):4959–4972, 2013. doi: 10.1021/ct400641n. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ct400641n. PMID: 26583414

    work page doi:10.1021/ct400641n 2013

  3. [3]

    Understanding contrasting s2 →s1 internal conversion rates in boron-dipyrromethene derivatives via multi-configuration time-dependent hartree method

    Neethu Anand, Munnyon Kim, Changmin Lee, Jinhyuk Ma, and Taiha Joo. Understanding contrasting s2 →s1 internal conversion rates in boron-dipyrromethene derivatives via multi-configuration time-dependent hartree method. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 27:23550–23560, 2025. doi: 10.1039/D5CP02771C. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1039/D5CP02771C

    work page doi:10.1039/d5cp02771c 2025

  4. [4]

    Nonadiabatic dynamics with trajectory surface hopping method.WIREsComputationalMolecular Science, 1(4):620–633, 2011

    Mario Barbatti. Nonadiabatic dynamics with trajectory surface hopping method.WIREsComputationalMolecular Science, 1(4):620–633, 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.64. URLhttps://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcms.64

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.64 2011

  5. [5]

    Mario Barbatti, Mattia Bondanza, Rachel Crespo-Otero, Baptiste Demoulin, Pavlo O. Dral, Giovanni Granucci, Fábris Kossoski, Hans Lischka, Benedetta Mennucci, Saikat Mukherjee, Marek Pederzoli, Maurizio Persico, Max Pinheiro Jr, Jiří Pittner, Felix Plasser, Eduarda Sangiogo Gil, and Ljiljana Stojanovic. Newton-x platform: New software developments for surf...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00804 2022

  6. [6]

    Becerra-González, Eduardo Peña-Cabrera, and José L

    José G. Becerra-González, Eduardo Peña-Cabrera, and José L. Belmonte-Vázquez. From blue to red. reaching the full visible spectrum with a single fluorophore: Bodipy.Tetrahedron, 168:134334, 2024. ISSN 0040-4020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2024.134334. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0040402024005155

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tet.2024.134334 2024

  7. [7]

    Best, Ruisong Xu, Matthew E

    Quinn A. Best, Ruisong Xu, Matthew E. McCarroll, Lichang Wang, and Daniel J. Dyer. Design and investigation of a series of rhodamine-based fluorescent probes for optical measurements of ph.Organic Letters, 12(14):3219–3221,

  8. [8]

    doi: 10.1021/ol1011967

    work page doi:10.1021/ol1011967

  9. [9]

    John C. Tully. Mixed quantum–classical dynamics.FaradayDiscuss., 110:407–419, 1998. doi: 10.1039/A801824C. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/A801824C

    work page doi:10.1039/a801824c 1998

  10. [10]

    Time-dependent density functional response theory for molecules

    Mark E Casida. Time-dependent density functional response theory for molecules. InRecent AdvancesIn Density FunctionalMethods: (Part I), pages 155–192. World Scientific, 1995

    1995

  11. [11]

    Mark E. Casida. Time-dependent density-functional theory for molecules and molecular solids.JournalofMolecular Structure: THEOCHEM, 914(1):3–18, 2009. ISSN 0166-1280. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2009. 08.018. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166128009005363. Time-dependent density-functional theory for molecules and mole...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.theochem.2009 2009

  12. [12]

    Vale Cofer-Shabica, Zeyu Zhou, Vishikh Athavale, Gregory Medders, Maximilian F

    Hsing-Ta Chen, Junhan Chen, D. Vale Cofer-Shabica, Zeyu Zhou, Vishikh Athavale, Gregory Medders, Maximilian F. S. J. Menger, Joseph E. Subotnik, and Zuxin Jin. Methods to calculate electronic excited-state dynamics for molecules on large metal clusters with many states: Ensuring fast overlap calculations and a robust choice of phase. Journal of Chemical T...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c01304 2022

  13. [13]

    and\ author Barbatti , M

    Rachel Crespo-Otero and Mario Barbatti. Recent advances and perspectives on nonadiabatic mixed quan- tum–classical dynamics.Chemical Reviews, 118(15):7026–7068, 2018. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577. URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577. PMID: 29767966

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00577 2018

  14. [14]

    Chemical Reviews , author =

    Andreas Dreuw and Martin Head-Gordon. Single-reference ab initio methods for the calculation of excited states of large molecules.Chemical Reviews, 105(11):4009–4037, 2005. doi: 10.1021/cr0505627. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1021/cr0505627. PMID: 16277369

    work page doi:10.1021/cr0505627 2005

  15. [15]

    Likai Du and Zhenggang Lan. An on-the-fly surface-hopping program jade for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics of polyatomic systems: Implementation and applications.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 11(4): 1360–1374, 2015. doi: 10.1021/ct501106d. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/ct501106d. PMID: 26574348. 18

    work page doi:10.1021/ct501106d 2015

  16. [16]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , author =

    Filipp Furche and Reinhart Ahlrichs. Adiabatic time-dependent density functional methods for excited state properties. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 117(16):7433–7447, 10 2002. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/1.1508368. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.1508368

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1508368 2002

  17. [17]

    and\ author Persico , M

    Giovanni Granucci and Maurizio Persico. Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 126(13):134114, 04 2007. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/1.2715585. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2715585

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2715585 2007

  18. [18]

    Handy and III Schaefer, Henry F

    Nicholas C. Handy and III Schaefer, Henry F. On the evaluation of analytic energy derivatives for correlated wave functions. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 81(11):5031–5033, 12 1984. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/1.447489. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.447489

    work page doi:10.1063/1.447489 1984

  19. [19]

    John M Herbert, Xing Zhang, Adrian F Morrison, and Jie Liu. Beyond time-dependent density functional theory using only single excitations: Methods for computational studies of excited states in complex systems.Accounts of chemical research, 49(5):931–941, 2016

    2016

  20. [20]

    Bodipy dyes: A new frontier in cellular imaging and theragnostic applications.Colorants, 4(2), 2025

    Panangattukara Prabhakaran Praveen Kumar, Shivanjali Saxena, and Rakesh Joshi. Bodipy dyes: A new frontier in cellular imaging and theragnostic applications.Colorants, 4(2), 2025. ISSN 2079-6447. doi: 10.3390/ colorants4020013. URLhttps://www.mdpi.com/2079-6447/4/2/13

    2025

  21. [21]

    Coherent internal conversion from high lying electronic states to s1 in boron-dipyrromethene derivatives.Phys

    Changmin Lee, Kiho Seo, Munnyon Kim, and Taiha Joo. Coherent internal conversion from high lying electronic states to s1 in boron-dipyrromethene derivatives.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 23:25200–25209, 2021. doi: 10.1039/ D1CP03513D. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1CP03513D

    work page doi:10.1039/d1cp03513d 2021

  22. [22]

    Fast overlap evaluations for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations: Applications to sf-tddft and tddft.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15(2): 882–891, 2019

    Seunghoon Lee, Eunji Kim, Sangyoub Lee, and Cheol Ho Choi. Fast overlap evaluations for nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulations: Applications to sf-tddft and tddft.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15(2): 882–891, 2019. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01049. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01049

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01049 2019

  23. [23]

    Seunghoon Lee, Yevhen Horbatenko, Michael Filatov, and Cheol Ho Choi. Fast and accurate computation of nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements using the truncated leibniz formula and mixed-reference spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 12(19):4722–4728, 2021. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00932. URLhttps...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00932 2021

  24. [24]

    and Eberhard, André and Burns, Noah Z

    Jingbai Li, Patrick Reiser, Benjamin R. Boswell, André Eberhard, Noah Z. Burns, Pascal Friederich, and Steven A. Lopez. Automatic discovery of photoisomerization mechanisms with nanosecond machine learning photodynamics simulations. Chem. Sci., 12:5302–5314, 2021. doi: 10.1039/D0SC05610C. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/ D0SC05610C

    work page doi:10.1039/d0sc05610c 2021

  25. [25]

    Introducing gpu acceleration into the python-based simulations of chemistry framework.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 129(5):1459–1468, 2025

    Rui Li, Qiming Sun, Xing Zhang, and Garnet Kin-Lic Chan. Introducing gpu acceleration into the python-based simulations of chemistry framework.The Journal of Physical Chemistry A, 129(5):1459–1468, 2025

    2025

  26. [26]

    Zhendong Li and Wenjian Liu. First-order nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements between excited states: A lagrangian formulation at the cis, rpa, td-hf, and td-dft levels.The Journal of chemical physics, 141(1), 2014

    2014

  27. [27]

    Zhendong Li, Bingbing Suo, and Wenjian Liu. First order nonadiabatic coupling matrix elements between excited states: Implementation and application at the td-dft and pp-tda levels.The Journal of chemical physics, 141(24), 2014

    2014

  28. [28]

    Liang Luo, Di Wu, Wei Li, Shuai Zhang, Yuanhong Ma, Su Yan, and Jingsong You. Regioselective decarboxylative direct c–h arylation of boron dipyrromethenes (bodipys) at 2,6-positions: A facile access to a diversity-oriented bodipy library.Organic Letters, 16(23):6080–6083, 2014. doi: 10.1021/ol502883x

    work page doi:10.1021/ol502883x 2014

  29. [29]

    Pattern Recog- nition153, 110500 (2024).https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j

    Daiyu Ma, Guimin Zhao, Haowen Chen, Renyin Zhou, Guanghao Zhang, Wenwen Tian, Wei Jiang, and Yueming Sun. Creation of bodipys-based red oleds with high color purity via modulating the energy gap and restricting rotation of substituents.Dyes and Pigments, 203:110377, 2022. ISSN 0143-7208. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. dyepig.2022.110377. URLhttps://www.s...

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2022

  30. [30]

    Mai , author P

    Sebastian Mai, Philipp Marquetand, and Leticia González. Nonadiabatic dynamics: The sharc approach. WIREs Computational Molecular Science, 8(6):e1370, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1370. URL https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcms.1370

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1370 2018

  31. [31]

    Myers, Ken Miyazaki, Thomas Trepl, Christine M

    Christopher A. Myers, Ken Miyazaki, Thomas Trepl, Christine M. Isborn, and Nandini Ananth. Gpu-accelerated on-the-fly nonadiabatic semiclassical dynamics.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 161(8):084114, 08 2024. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/5.0223628. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0223628. 19

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0223628 2024

  32. [32]

    and White, Alexander J

    Tammie R. Nelson, Alexander J. White, Josiah A. Bjorgaard, Andrew E. Sifain, Yu Zhang, Benjamin Nebgen, Sebastian Fernandez-Alberti, Dmitry Mozyrsky, Adrian E. Roitberg, and Sergei Tretiak. Non-adiabatic excited- state molecular dynamics: Theory and applications for modeling photophysics in extended molecular materials. Chemical Reviews, 120(4):2215–2287,...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00447 2020

  33. [33]

    Ziqi Nie, Tingting Gu, Xu Liang, Rahul Singhal, Haijun Xu, and Ganesh D. Sharma. Improving photovoltaic performance of organic solar cells utilizing medium bandgap bodipy non-fused acceptor as third component via ternary strategy.JournalofMolecularStructure, 1335:141977, 2025. ISSN 0022-2860. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.molstruc.2025.141977. URLhttps:...

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    cutensor documentation – just-in-time compilation.https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/ cutensor/latest/just_in_time_compilation.html, 2026

    NVIDIA Corporation. cutensor documentation – just-in-time compilation.https://docs.nvidia.com/cuda/ cutensor/latest/just_in_time_compilation.html, 2026. Accessed: 2026-04-02

    2026

  35. [35]

    cutile python api documentation – execution and jit compilation.https://docs.nvidia

    NVIDIA Corporation. cutile python api documentation – execution and jit compilation.https://docs.nvidia. com/cuda/cutile-python/execution.html, 2026. Accessed: 2026-04-02

    2026

  36. [36]

    Cuda compiler driver nvcc documentation – just-in-time compilation.https://docs

    NVIDIA Corporation. Cuda compiler driver nvcc documentation – just-in-time compilation.https://docs. nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-compiler-driver-nvcc/#just-in-time-compilation, 2026. Accessed: 2026-04-02

    2026

  37. [37]

    First-order derivative couplings between excited states from adiabatic tddft response theory.The Journal of chemical physics, 142(6), 2015

    Qi Ou, Gregory D Bellchambers, Filipp Furche, and Joseph E Subotnik. First-order derivative couplings between excited states from adiabatic tddft response theory.The Journal of chemical physics, 142(6), 2015

    2015

  38. [38]

    Parker, Dmitrij Rappoport, and Filipp Furche

    Shane M. Parker, Dmitrij Rappoport, and Filipp Furche. Quadratic response properties from tddft: Trials and tribulations. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 14(2):807–819, 2018. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01008. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01008. PMID: 29232511

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01008 2018

  39. [39]

    Performance and Analysis of the Alchemical Transfer Method for Binding-Free-Energy Predictions of Diverse Ligands

    Wei-Tao Peng, Dominik Brey, Samuele Giannini, David Dell’Angelo, Irene Burghardt, and Jochen Blumberger. Exciton dissociation in a model organic interface: Excitonic state-based surface hopping versus multiconfigurational time-dependent hartree. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 13(31):7105–7112, 2022. doi: 10.1021/acs. jpclett.2c01928. URLhttps:...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs 2022

  40. [40]

    Laurens D. M. Peters, Jörg Kussmann, and Christian Ochsenfeld. Nonadiabatic molecular dynamics on graphics processing units: Performance and application to rotary molecular motors.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 15(12):6647–6659, 2019. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00859. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc. 9b00859. PMID: 31763834

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00859 2019

  41. [41]

    Laurens D. M. Peters, Jörg Kussmann, and Christian Ochsenfeld. Combining graphics processing units, simplified time-dependent density functional theory, and finite-difference couplings to accelerate nonadiabatic molecular dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 11(10):3955–3961, 2020. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00320. URLhttps://doi.org/10.10...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00320 2020

  42. [42]

    Optimization of mixed quantum-classical dynamics: Time- derivative coupling terms and selected couplings.Chemical Physics, 356(1):147–152, 2009

    Jiri Pittner, Hans Lischka, and Mario Barbatti. Optimization of mixed quantum-classical dynamics: Time- derivative coupling terms and selected couplings.Chemical Physics, 356(1):147–152, 2009. ISSN 0301-0104. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2008.10.013. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0301010408004783. Moving Frontiers in Qu...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2008.10.013 2009

  43. [43]

    Efficient and flexible computation of many-electron wave function overlaps.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 12(3):1207–1219, 2016

    Felix Plasser, Matthias Ruckenbauer, Sebastian Mai, Markus Oppel, Philipp Marquetand, and Leticia González. Efficient and flexible computation of many-electron wave function overlaps.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 12(3):1207–1219, 2016. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01148. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc. 5b01148. PMID: 26854874

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01148 2016

  44. [44]

    Zhichen Pu, Xiaojie Wu, Yuanheng Wang, Cheng Fan, Wen Yan, Zehao Zhou, Yi Qin Gao, and Qiming Sun. Analytical excited-state gradients and derivative couplings in tddft with minimal auxiliary basis set approximation and gpu acceleration.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 0(0):null, 0. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01960. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.j...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01960

  45. [45]

    Subotnik

    Tian Qiu, Clàudia Climent, and Joseph E. Subotnik. A practical approach to wave function propagation, hopping probabilities, and time steps in surface hopping calculations.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 19 (10):2744–2757, 2023. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00126. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00126. PMID: 37130302

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00126 2023

  46. [46]

    Dmitrij Rappoport and Filipp Furche. Analytical time-dependent density functional derivative methods within the ri-j approximation, an approach to excited states of large molecules.The Journal of chemical physics, 122(6), 2005. 20

    2005

  47. [47]

    Ryabinkin, Jayashree Nagesh, and Artur F

    Ilya G. Ryabinkin, Jayashree Nagesh, and Artur F. Izmaylov. Fast numerical evaluation of time-derivative nonadiabatic couplings for mixed quantum-classical methods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 6 (21):4200–4203, 2015. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02062. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02062. PMID: 26538034

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02062 2015

  48. [48]

    Giovanni Scalmani, Michael J Frisch, Benedetta Mennucci, Jacopo Tomasi, Roberto Cammi, and Vincenzo Barone. Geometries and properties of excited states in the gas phase and in solution: Theory and application of a time-dependent density functional theory polarizable continuum model.The Journal of chemical physics, 124(9), 2006

    2006

  49. [49]

    Robert Send and Filipp Furche. First-order nonadiabatic couplings from time-dependent hybrid density functional response theory: Consistent formalism, implementation, and performance.The Journal of chemical physics, 132 (4), 2010

    2010

  50. [50]

    Fischer, Yu Zhang, Christopher J

    Huajing Song, Sean A. Fischer, Yu Zhang, Christopher J. Cramer, Shaul Mukamel, Niranjan Govind, and Sergei Tretiak. First principles nonadiabatic excited-state molecular dynamics in nwchem.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 16(10):6418–6427, 2020. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00295. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs. jctc.0c00295. PMID: 32808780

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00295 2020

  51. [51]

    The requisite electronic structure theory to describe photoexcited nonadiabatic dynamics: Nonadiabatic derivative couplings and diabatic electronic couplings

    Joseph E Subotnik, Ethan C Alguire, Qi Ou, Brian R Landry, and Shervin Fatehi. The requisite electronic structure theory to describe photoexcited nonadiabatic dynamics: Nonadiabatic derivative couplings and diabatic electronic couplings. Accounts of chemical research, 48(5):1340–1350, 2015

    2015

  52. [52]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics , author =

    Qiming Sun, Xing Zhang, Samragni Banerjee, Peng Bao, Marc Barbry, Nick S. Blunt, Nikolay A. Bogdanov, George H. Booth, Jia Chen, Zhi-Hao Cui, Janus J. Eriksen, Yang Gao, Sheng Guo, Jan Hermann, Matthew R. Hermes, Kevin Koh, Peter Koval, Susi Lehtola, Zhendong Li, Junzi Liu, Narbe Mardirossian, James D. McClain, MarioMotta, BastienMussard, HungQ.Pham, Arte...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0006074 2020

  53. [53]

    Thomas Just Sørensen, Dong Shi, and Bo W. Laursen. Tetramethoxy-aminorhodamine (tmarh): A bichromophore, an improved fluorophore, and a ph switch.Chemistry –A European Journal, 22(21):7046–7049, 2016. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201600496. URL https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ abs/10.1002/chem.201600496

    work page doi:10.1002/chem.201600496 2016

  54. [54]

    Trajectory surface hopping within linear response time-dependent density-functional theory.Physical review letters, 98(2):023001, 2007

    Enrico Tapavicza, Ivano Tavernelli, and Ursula Rothlisberger. Trajectory surface hopping within linear response time-dependent density-functional theory.Physical review letters, 98(2):023001, 2007

    2007

  55. [55]

    Meyer, and Filipp Furche

    Enrico Tapavicza, Alexander M. Meyer, and Filipp Furche. Unravelling the details of vitamin d photosynthesis by non-adiabatic molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13:20986–20998, 2011. doi: 10.1039/C1CP21292C. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1CP21292C

    work page doi:10.1039/c1cp21292c 2011

  56. [56]

    Tapavicza , author G

    Enrico Tapavicza, Gregory D. Bellchambers, Jordan C. Vincent, and Filipp Furche. Ab initio non-adiabatic molecular dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15:18336–18348, 2013. doi: 10.1039/C3CP51514A. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C3CP51514A

    work page doi:10.1039/c3cp51514a 2013

  57. [57]

    John C. Tully. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 93(2):1061–1071, 07 1990. ISSN 0021-9606. doi: 10.1063/1.459170. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.459170

    work page doi:10.1063/1.459170 1990

  58. [58]

    Perspective: Nonadiabatic dynamics theory.The Journal of chemical physics, 137(22), 2012

    John C Tully. Perspective: Nonadiabatic dynamics theory.The Journal of chemical physics, 137(22), 2012

    2012

  59. [59]

    \ Vogt , author M

    Jan-Robert Vogt, Michael Schulz, Rafael Souza Mattos, Mario Barbatti, Maurizio Persico, Giovanni Granucci, Jürg Hutter, and Anna Hehn. A density functional theory and semiempirical framework for trajectory surface hopping on extended systems.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 21(20):10474–10488, 2025. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01082. URLhttps://doi...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c01082 2025

  60. [60]

    Surface hopping methods for nonadiabatic dynamics in extended systems

    Linjun Wang, Jing Qiu, Xin Bai, and Jiabo Xu. Surface hopping methods for nonadiabatic dynamics in extended systems. WIREs Computational Molecular Science, 10(2):e1435, 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1435. URLhttps://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/wcms.1435

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1435 2020

  61. [61]

    Superacid-resistant macrocyclic bodipys.Nature Communications, 17(1):2332, March 2026

    Keita Watanabe, Gentaro Honda, Yuki Terauchi, Shunsuke Mamiya, Yuya Inaba, Tasuku Nakajima, Jian Ping Gong, Yusaku Yamaguchi, Yuichi Kitagawa, Yasuchika Hasegawa, Yuki Ide, Min Gao, Tomoki Yoneda, and 21 Yasuhide Inokuma. Superacid-resistant macrocyclic bodipys.Nature Communications, 17(1):2332, March 2026. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-026-70499-9....

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-70499-9 2026

  62. [62]

    Florian Weigend and Reinhart Ahlrichs. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for h to rn: Design and assessment of accuracy.Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 7(18): 3297–3305, 2005

    2005

  63. [63]

    Nonadiabatic field on quantum phase space: A century after ehrenfest

    Baihua Wu, Xin He, and Jian Liu. Nonadiabatic field on quantum phase space: A century after ehrenfest. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 15(2):644–658, 2024. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03385. URLhttps: //doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03385. PMID: 38205956

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03385 2024

  64. [64]

    Enhancing gpu-acceleration in the python-based simulations of chemistry framework, 2024

    Xiaojie Wu, Qiming Sun, Zhichen Pu, Tianze Zheng, Wenzhi Ma, Wen Yan, Xia Yu, Zhengxiao Wu, Mian Huo, Xiang Li, Weiluo Ren, Sheng Gong, Yumin Zhang, and Weihao Gao. Enhancing gpu-acceleration in the python-based simulations of chemistry framework, 2024. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2404.09452

    work page arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Designing quantum chemistry algorithms with just-in-time compilation, 2025

    Qiming Sun Xiaojie Wu and Yuanheng Wang. Designing quantum chemistry algorithms with just-in-time compilation, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09772

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Longyue Yu, Xionghui Huang, Ning Feng, Wenwen Fu, Xia Xin, Jingcheng Hao, and Hongguang Li. Solvent-free artificial light-harvesting system in a fluid donor with highly efficient förster resonance energy transfer.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 16(5):1305–1311, 2025. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03518

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c03518 2025

  67. [67]

    Revealingthesensingmechanismofafluorescentphprobe based on a bichromophore approach.Phys.Chem

    WeiZhang, LiZhao, BoW.Laursen, andJunshengChen. Revealingthesensingmechanismofafluorescentphprobe based on a bichromophore approach.Phys.Chem. Chem. Phys., 24:26731–26737, 2022. doi: 10.1039/D2CP04339D. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D2CP04339D

    work page doi:10.1039/d2cp04339d 2022

  68. [68]

    Analytic derivative couplings for spin-flip configuration interaction singles and spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 141(6), 2014

    Xing Zhang and John M Herbert. Analytic derivative couplings for spin-flip configuration interaction singles and spin-flip time-dependent density functional theory.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 141(6), 2014

    2014

  69. [69]

    Xing Zhang and John M Herbert. Analytic derivative couplings in time-dependent density functional theory: Quadratic response theory versus pseudo-wavefunction approach.The Journal of chemical physics, 142(6), 2015

    2015

  70. [70]

    Xing Zhang and John M Herbert. Nonadiabatic dynamics with spin-flip vs linear-response time-dependent density functional theory: A case study for the protonated schiff base c5h6nh2+.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 155 (12), 2021

    2021

  71. [71]

    Ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics investigations on the excited carriers in condensed matter systems

    Qijing Zheng, Weibin Chu, Chuanyu Zhao, Lili Zhang, Hongli Guo, Yanan Wang, Xiang Jiang, and Jin Zhao. Ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics investigations on the excited carriers in condensed matter systems. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science, 9(6):e1411, March 2019. ISSN 17590884. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1411

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1411 2019

  72. [72]

    Zehao Zhou and Shane M Parker. Converging time-dependent density functional theory calculations in five iterations with minimal auxiliary preconditioning.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 20(15):6738– 6746, 2024

    2024

  73. [73]

    Zehao Zhou, Fabio Della Sala, and Shane M. Parker. Minimal auxiliary basis set approach for the electronic excitation spectra of organic molecules.The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 14(7):1968–1976, 2023. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03698. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03698. PMID: 36787711

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03698 1968

  74. [74]

    Gpu accelerated minimal auxiliary basis approach tddft for large organic molecules, 2026

    Zehao Zhou, Xiaojie Wu, Yanheng Li, Xinran Wei, Cheng Fan, Fusong Ju, Qiming Sun, and Yi Qin Gao. Gpu accelerated minimal auxiliary basis approach tddft for large organic molecules, 2026. URLhttps://arxiv.org/ abs/2603.29257. 22

    work page arXiv 2026