arxiv: 2605.06559 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-lat · hep-ex· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

The strange and flavor-singlet axial form factors of the nucleon from lattice QCD

Alessandro Barone, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Hartmut Wittig, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-lat hep-exhep-ph

keywords lattice QCDnucleon axial form factorsstrange quark contributionsflavor singletdisconnected diagramsnucleon spin structureCLS ensembles

0 comments

The pith

Lattice QCD yields the singlet and strange axial form factors of the nucleon with controlled uncertainties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the flavor-singlet axial form factor combining up, down and strange quarks together with the separate strange contribution using lattice simulations. It employs N_f=2+1 CLS gauge ensembles of O(a)-improved Wilson fermions and carries out extrapolations to the physical point with a complete accounting of statistical and systematic errors. Particular effort goes into evaluating the disconnected quark contributions that dominate the strange piece. When added to existing isovector and octet results the new numbers complete a lattice determination of the nucleon's axial structure in all flavor channels.

Core claim

We present a lattice QCD determination of the singlet axial form factor G_A^{u+d+s}(Q^2) and the strange contribution G_A^s(Q^2) using N_f=2+1 CLS gauge ensembles with O(a)-improved Wilson fermions, including a full error budget for the extrapolation to the chiral, continuum and infinite-volume limits. Particular focus is placed on the treatment of the disconnected contributions, which constitute the crucial element for the extraction of the strange component.

What carries the argument

Lattice QCD simulations on CLS ensembles of O(a)-improved Wilson fermions, with explicit computation of disconnected quark-loop diagrams to isolate the strange axial form factor.

If this is right

The results supply the missing flavor-singlet piece needed for a complete lattice decomposition of the nucleon spin.
Combined with the isovector and octet axial form factors they give the full set of axial matrix elements across quark flavors.
The numbers provide direct input for modeling axial currents in neutrino-nucleon scattering and related processes.
The controlled error budget allows quantitative tests of whether strange quarks contribute appreciably to the proton spin.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the strange form factor remains small at low Q^2, models that attribute a sizable fraction of the spin puzzle to strange quarks would need revision.
The same disconnected-diagram techniques can be reused for other singlet operators such as the gluonic spin contribution.
Future finer lattices or different fermion actions could test whether the present extrapolation assumptions hold.

Load-bearing premise

The disconnected strange-quark contributions are evaluated with enough precision that residual systematics after extrapolation remain smaller than the quoted errors.

What would settle it

A statistically significant mismatch between the extrapolated G_A^s(0) and the value obtained from polarized deep-inelastic scattering data would indicate that the lattice treatment of disconnected diagrams or the extrapolations are incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06559 by Alessandro Barone, Dalibor Djukanovic, Georg von Hippel, Hartmut Wittig, Harvey B. Meyer, Konstantin Ottnad.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Comparison between the disconnected contribution view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of the direct view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. The singlet axial form factor obtained with view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Chiral continuum extrapolation for the strange (top) and singlet (bottom) with finite-volume term and with no cut on view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Our result for the axial charge view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Final result for the strange (top) and singlet (bottom) view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Linear fit to the summation expression Eq. (26) for the bare connected contribution to the singlet form factor at view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The singlet axial form factor of the nucleon provides essential input for a complete understanding of the nucleon axial structure. Together with the isovector and isoscalar octet channels, in the forward limit it forms the basis for a full flavor decomposition of the proton spin. In this work we present a lattice QCD determination of the singlet axial form factor $G^{u+d+s}_A(Q^2)$ and related strange contribution $G^{s}_A(Q^2)$ using a set of $N_f = 2 + 1$ CLS gauge ensembles with $O(a)$-improved Wilson fermions, with a full error budget for the extrapolation to the chiral, continuum and infinite-volume limits. Particular focus is placed on the treatment of the disconnected contributions, which constitute the crucial element for the extraction of the strange component. Together with determinations of the isovector and isoscalar octet axial form factors, this work provides a comprehensive lattice QCD determination of the nucleon axial structure across different flavor channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

New CLS results on the nucleon singlet and strange axial form factors look solid on the surface but require careful checking on the disconnected error control.

read the letter

This paper computes the singlet axial form factor of the nucleon and the strange contribution using lattice QCD on the CLS set of Nf = 2 + 1 ensembles with O(a)-improved Wilson fermions. It includes extrapolations to the physical point, continuum limit, and infinite volume, and it pays particular attention to the disconnected diagrams that are essential for the strange piece. What stands out is that they aim for a full flavor decomposition by combining this with isovector and octet channels. That makes the work more complete for applications to the proton spin sum rule. The choice of ensembles is reasonable for controlling lattice spacing and quark mass effects, and the focus on disconnected contributions shows they understand where the main technical difficulty lies. The potential weak point is exactly in those disconnected contributions and the overall error budget. While the abstract states that a full error budget is provided, the actual size of uncertainties from stochastic estimation of the loops, from residual excited states, and from the choice of extrapolation functions needs to be demonstrated clearly in the text and figures. If those checks are solid and show that the errors are dominated by statistics rather than method, the results are reliable. If the paper leaves some of that implicit, then the quoted errors could be too small. For a reader, this is useful if you need updated lattice input for nucleon axial structure or related phenomenology. It is not going to change the field broadly, but it fills in a specific gap with modern methods. I would recommend sending it for peer review. The calculation is grounded in established techniques, and the community can benefit from the numbers once the systematics are vetted.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a lattice QCD determination of the flavor-singlet axial form factor G_A^{u+d+s}(Q^2) and the strange-quark contribution G_A^s(Q^2) on N_f=2+1 CLS ensembles with O(a)-improved Wilson fermions. It emphasizes the treatment of disconnected diagrams and asserts a complete error budget for simultaneous chiral, continuum, and infinite-volume extrapolations, providing these results together with isovector and isoscalar-octet channels to complete a flavor decomposition of the nucleon axial structure.

Significance. If the error budget holds, the work supplies valuable non-perturbative input for the nucleon spin decomposition and strange-quark contributions to axial charges, serving as a benchmark for phenomenology and other lattice calculations. The use of multiple CLS ensembles and explicit focus on disconnected contributions are positive features.

major comments (2)

Abstract: the assertion of a 'full error budget' for the chiral/continuum/volume extrapolation is load-bearing for the central claim, yet no quantitative breakdown is supplied for the size of residual uncertainties from the stochastic estimation of disconnected loops or from the choice of extrapolation ansatz. This directly affects the reliability of G_A^s(Q^2) and the singlet combination.
Disconnected-diagram analysis: the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (e.g., via variance reduction factors, plateau stability, or comparison of different stochastic estimators) that the disconnected signals remain statistics-limited rather than method-limited on every ensemble used; otherwise the quoted total errors on the strange form factor cannot be taken at face value.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the various flavor combinations (isovector, octet, singlet) should be introduced once in a dedicated table or equation block and used consistently thereafter.
The figures displaying the Q^2 dependence and the extrapolation fits would benefit from explicit indication of the physical-point result and its total uncertainty band.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of our work and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will incorporate the suggested improvements into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: the assertion of a 'full error budget' for the chiral/continuum/volume extrapolation is load-bearing for the central claim, yet no quantitative breakdown is supplied for the size of residual uncertainties from the stochastic estimation of disconnected loops or from the choice of extrapolation ansatz. This directly affects the reliability of G_A^s(Q^2) and the singlet combination.

Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative breakdown of the individual uncertainty components would strengthen the presentation of the full error budget. While the manuscript already includes a systematic study of extrapolation ansatz variations and estimates of stochastic noise in the disconnected contributions (detailed in the extrapolation and error analysis sections), we will add a dedicated table and accompanying text in the revised version that decomposes the total errors into statistical, stochastic-estimator, and ansatz-related contributions for both G_A^{u+d+s}(Q^2) and G_A^s(Q^2). We will also revise the abstract to reference this breakdown more precisely. revision: yes
Referee: Disconnected-diagram analysis: the manuscript must demonstrate explicitly (e.g., via variance reduction factors, plateau stability, or comparison of different stochastic estimators) that the disconnected signals remain statistics-limited rather than method-limited on every ensemble used; otherwise the quoted total errors on the strange form factor cannot be taken at face value.

Authors: We accept this request for more explicit validation. In the revised manuscript we will augment the disconnected-diagram section with additional figures and tables showing (i) variance reduction factors obtained from the stochastic estimator techniques employed, (ii) plateau stability under variations in fit range and starting time slice, and (iii) direct comparisons of results using different numbers of stochastic sources on representative ensembles. These additions will confirm that the quoted errors remain statistics-dominated on all ensembles used for the strange form factor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical lattice QCD computation

full rationale

The paper performs a standard lattice QCD calculation of axial form factors on external CLS gauge ensembles using O(a)-improved Wilson fermions. The central results for G^{u+d+s}_A(Q^2) and G^s_A(Q^2) are obtained via stochastic estimation of disconnected diagrams followed by simultaneous chiral/continuum/infinite-volume extrapolation with an explicit error budget. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, no self-definitional equations appear, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled via self-citation. The derivation chain consists of independent numerical measurements and standard extrapolations that remain falsifiable against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; typical lattice QCD free parameters (lattice spacing, bare quark masses, volume) are present but their specific fitted values and impact on the final result cannot be audited. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

lattice spacing a
Multiple spacings used for continuum extrapolation; exact values not stated in abstract.
pion mass m_pi
Chiral extrapolation performed; physical-point values implicit but not quantified.

axioms (2)

standard math Locality and unitarity of the lattice action
Standard assumption for Wilson-fermion lattice QCD invoked by choice of action.
domain assumption Validity of chiral, continuum, and infinite-volume extrapolations
Central to the claimed full error budget; form of fit functions not shown.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5492 in / 1344 out tokens · 50704 ms · 2026-05-08T03:20:43.987646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

[1]

Ji, Phys

X.-D. Ji, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 610 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9603249

work page arXiv 1997
[2]

V. Y. Alexakhinet al.(COMPASS), Phys. Lett. B647, 8 (2007), arXiv:hep-ex/0609038

work page arXiv 2007
[3]

C. A. Aidala, S. D. Bass, D. Hasch, and G. K. Mallot, Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 655 (2013), arXiv:1209.2803 [hep- ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[4]

Acciarriet al.(DUNE Collaboration), arXiv:1512.06148

R. Acciarriet al.(DUNE), arXiv:1512.06148 [physics.ins- det] (2015)

work page arXiv 2015
[5]

Abe, et al

K. Abeet al.(Hyper-Kamiokande), Hyper-Kamiokande Design Report (2018), arXiv:1805.04163 [physics.ins- det]

work page arXiv 2018
[6]

Beckeret al., Eur

D. Beckeret al., Eur. Phys. J. A54, 208 (2018), arXiv:1802.04759 [nucl-ex]

work page arXiv 2018
[7]

Papavassiliou, AIP Conf

V. Papavassiliou, AIP Conf. Proc.1222, 186 (2010)

2010
[8]

Miceli, V

T. Miceli, V. Papavassiliou, S. Pate, and K. Woodruff (MicroBooNE), Phys. Procedia61, 495 (2015), arXiv:1406.5204 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2015
[9]

K. S. Kim, K.-S. Choi, M.-K. Cheoun, W. Y. So, and H. Moon, Phys. Rev. C100, 034604 (2019)

2019
[10]

G. S. Bali, L. Barca, S. Collins, M. Gruber, M. L¨ offler, A. Sch¨ afer, W. S¨ oldner, P. Wein, S. Weish¨ aupl, and T. Wurm (RQCD), JHEP05, 126, arXiv:1911.13150 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 1911
[11]

Hasan, J

N. Hasan, J. Green, S. Meinel, M. Engelhardt, S. Krieg, J. Negele, A. Pochinsky, and S. Syritsyn, Phys. Rev. D 99, 114505 (2019), arXiv:1903.06487 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2019
[12]

Alexandrouet al., Phys

C. Alexandrouet al., Phys. Rev. D103, 034509 (2021), arXiv:2011.13342 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2021
[13]

Gupta, Y.-C

R. Gupta, Y.-C. Jang, H.-W. Lin, B. Yoon, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. D96, 114503 (2017), arXiv:1705.06834 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2017
[14]

Djukanovic, G

D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, J. Koponen, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, T. Schulz, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D106, 074503 (2022), arXiv:2207.03440 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[15]

Y.-C. Jang, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 072002 (2020), arXiv:1905.06470 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[16]

Tomalak, R

O. Tomalak, R. Gupta, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. D108, 074514 (2023), arXiv:2307.14920 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Y.-C. Jang, R. Gupta, T. Bhattacharya, B. Yoon, and H.-W. Lin (Precision Neutron Decay Matrix Ele- ments (PNDME)), Phys. Rev. D109, 014503 (2024), arXiv:2305.11330 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[18]

A. S. Meyer, The Nucleon Axial Form Factor from Av- eraging Lattice QCD Results (2026), arXiv:2601.02676 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2026
[19]

Up, down, and strange nucleon axial form factors from lattice QCD,

J. Green, N. Hasan, S. Meinel, M. Engelhardt, S. Krieg, 10 J. Laeuchli, J. Negele, K. Orginos, A. Pochinsky, and S. Syritsyn, Phys. Rev. D95, 114502 (2017), arXiv:1703.06703 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2017
[20]

Alexandrou, S

C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, M. Constantinou, K. Had- jiyiannakou, K. Jansen, and G. Koutsou, Phys. Rev. D 104, 074503 (2021), arXiv:2106.13468 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Liang, Y.-B

J. Liang, Y.-B. Yang, T. Draper, M. Gong, and K.-F. Liu, Phys. Rev. D98, 074505 (2018), arXiv:1806.08366 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[22]

H.-W. Lin, R. Gupta, B. Yoon, Y.-C. Jang, and T. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rev. D98, 094512 (2018), arXiv:1806.10604 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2018
[23]

S. Park, T. Bhattacharya, R. Gupta, Y.-C. Jang, B. Joo, H.-W. Lin, and B. Yoon, PoSLA TTICE2019, 136 (2020), arXiv:2002.02147 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[24]

Alexandrou, S

C. Alexandrou, S. Bacchio, J. Finkenrath, C. Iona, G. Koutsou, Y. Li, and G. Spanoudes, Phys. Rev. D111, 054505 (2025), arXiv:2412.01535 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Barone, D

A. Barone, D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, J. Koponen, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, and H. Wittig, PoSLA T- TICE2024, 334 (2025), arXiv:2502.06305 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2025
[26]

Barone, D

A. Barone, D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, J. Koponen, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D 112, 014503 (2025), arXiv:2503.18848 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2025
[27]

Brunoet al., Simulation of QCD with N f = 2 + 1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions, JHEP02, 043, arXiv:1411.3982 [hep-lat]

M. Brunoet al., JHEP02, 043, arXiv:1411.3982 [hep- lat]

work page arXiv
[28]

Sheikholeslami and R

B. Sheikholeslami and R. Wohlert, Nucl. Phys. B259, 572 (1985)

1985
[29]

Luscher and P

M. Luscher and P. Weisz, Commun. Math. Phys.98, 433 (1985), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 98, 433 (1985)]

1985
[30]

Mohler and S

D. Mohler and S. Schaefer, Phys. Rev. D102, 074506 (2020), arXiv:2003.13359 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[31]

Kuberski, Comput

S. Kuberski, Comput. Phys. Commun.300, 109173 (2024), arXiv:2306.02385 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Strassbergeret al., PoSLA TTICE2021, 135 (2022), arXiv:2112.06696 [hep-lat]

B. Strassbergeret al., PoSLA TTICE2021, 135 (2022), arXiv:2112.06696 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

G. S. Bali, S. Collins, P. Georg, D. Jenkins, P. Korcyl, A. Sch¨ afer, E. E. Scholz, J. Simeth, W. S¨ oldner, and S. Weish¨ aupl (RQCD), JHEP05, 035, arXiv:2211.03744 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv
[34]

Gusken, U

S. Gusken, U. Low, K. H. Mutter, R. Sommer, A. Patel, and K. Schilling, Phys. Lett. B227, 266 (1989)

1989
[35]

Albaneseet al.(APE), Phys

M. Albaneseet al.(APE), Phys. Lett. B192, 163 (1987)

1987
[36]

Agadjanov, D

A. Agadjanov, D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 261902 (2023), arXiv:2303.08741 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2023
[37]

M. C` e, A. G´ erardin, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Miura, K. Ottnad, A. Risch, T. San Jos´ e, J. Wil- helm, and H. Wittig, JHEP08, 220, arXiv:2203.08676 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv
[38]

Bulava, M

J. Bulava, M. Della Morte, J. Heitger, and C. Wit- temeier (ALPHA), Nucl. Phys. B896, 555 (2015), arXiv:1502.04999 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2015
[39]

G. S. Bali, V. Braun, S. Collins, A. Sch¨ afer, and J. Simeth (RQCD), JHEP08, 137, arXiv:2106.05398 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv
[40]

Dalla Brida, T

M. Dalla Brida, T. Korzec, S. Sint, and P. Vilaseca, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 23 (2019), arXiv:1808.09236 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2019
[41]

G. S. Bali, S. Collins, S. Heybrock, M. L¨ offler, R. R¨ odl, W. S¨ oldner, and S. Weish¨ aupl (RQCD), Phys. Rev. D 108, 034512 (2023), arXiv:2305.04717 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2023
[42]

Bhattacharya, R

T. Bhattacharya, R. Gupta, W. Lee, S. R. Sharpe, and J. M. S. Wu, Phys. Rev. D73, 034504 (2006), arXiv:hep- lat/0511014

work page arXiv 2006
[43]

Maiani, G

L. Maiani, G. Martinelli, M. L. Paciello, and B. Taglienti, Nucl. Phys. B293, 420 (1987)

1987
[44]

Capitani, M

S. Capitani, M. Della Morte, G. von Hippel, B. Jager, A. Juttner, B. Knippschild, H. B. Meyer, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D86, 074502 (2012), arXiv:1205.0180 [hep- lat]

work page arXiv 2012
[45]

Djukanovic, G

D. Djukanovic, G. von Hippel, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, M. Salg, and H. Wittig, Phys. Rev. D109, 094510 (2024), arXiv:2309.06590 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

S. R. Beane and M. J. Savage, Phys. Rev. D70, 074029 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0404131

work page arXiv 2004
[47]

Z. B. Hallet al., Signs of Non-Monotonic Finite-Volume Corrections tog A (2025), arXiv:2503.09891 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

W. I. Jay and E. T. Neil, Phys. Rev. D103, 114502 (2021), arXiv:2008.01069 [stat.ME]

work page arXiv 2021
[49]

Akaike, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19, 716 (1974)

H. Akaike, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control19, 716 (1974)

1974
[50]

Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), FLAG review 2024, Phys

Y. Aokiet al.(Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)), Phys. Rev. D113, 014508 (2026), arXiv:2411.04268 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2026
[51]

Djukanovic, H

D. Djukanovic, H. Meyer, K. Ottnad, G. von Hippel, J. Wilhelm, and H. Wittig, PoSLA TTICE2019, 158 (2019), arXiv:1911.01177 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2019
[52]

Ashmanet al.(European Muon), Phys

J. Ashmanet al.(European Muon), Phys. Lett. B206, 364 (1988)

1988
[53]

Ashmanet al.(European Muon), Nucl

J. Ashmanet al.(European Muon), Nucl. Phys. B328, 1 (1989)

1989
[54]

R. G. Edwards and B. Joo (SciDAC, LHPC, UKQCD), Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.140, 832 (2005), arXiv:hep- lat/0409003

work page arXiv 2005
[55]

Luscher and S

M. Luscher and S. Schaefer, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 519 (2013), arXiv:1206.2809 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2013
[56]

Djukanovic, Comput

D. Djukanovic, Comput. Phys. Commun.247, 106950 (2020), arXiv:1603.01576 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2020
[57]

Harris, G

T. Harris, G. von Hippel, P. Junnarkar, H. B. Meyer, K. Ottnad, J. Wilhelm, H. Wittig, and L. Wrang, Phys. Rev. D100, 034513 (2019), arXiv:1905.01291 [hep-lat]

work page arXiv 2019
[58]

Wilhelm,The strangeness form factors of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Ph.D

J. Wilhelm,The strangeness form factors of the nucleon from lattice QCD, Ph.D. thesis, Johannes Gutenberg Uni- versity Mainz (2020)

2020
[59]

Martinelli, C

G. Martinelli, C. Pittori, C. T. Sachrajda, M. Testa, and A. Vladikas, Nucl. Phys. B445, 81 (1995), arXiv:hep- lat/9411010

work page arXiv 1995
[60]

Gockeler, R

M. Gockeler, R. Horsley, H. Oelrich, H. Perlt, D. Petters, P. E. L. Rakow, A. Schafer, G. Schierholz, and A. Schiller, Nucl. Phys. B544, 699 (1999), arXiv:hep-lat/9807044

work page arXiv 1999
[61]

S. J. Brodsky, G. P. Lepage, and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D28, 228 (1983)

1983
[62]

G. P. Lepage and P. B. Mackenzie, Phys. Rev. D48, 2250 (1993), arXiv:hep-lat/9209022

work page arXiv 1993
[63]

S. A. Larin, Phys. Lett. B303, 113 (1993), arXiv:hep- ph/9302240

work page arXiv 1993
[64]

S. A. Larin and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Phys. Lett. B303, 334 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9302208

work page Pith review arXiv 1993
[65]

two-step

M. Dalla Brida, R. H¨ ollwieser, F. Knechtli, T. Korzec, A. Ramos, S. Sint, and R. Sommer, Nature652, 328 (2026). 11 APPENDIX A. Renormalization Our calculation of the renormalization factors is de- scribed in detail in Ref. [57]; here we summarize the per- tinent formulae and concentrate on the results for the singlet case, for which we follow the prelim...

2026