pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06574 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Molecular dynamics simulation study of mechanical properties of 3C-SiC with extended defects

Andrey Sarikov, Serhii Shmahlii

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 08:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords 3C-SiCmolecular dynamicselastic moduliShockley partial dislocationsstacking faultsextended defectsVashishta potentialbond-order potential
0
0 comments X

The pith

Molecular dynamics simulations show extended defects reduce the stiffness of 3C-SiC by up to 6%.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper runs large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of cubic silicon carbide containing Shockley partial dislocations that end stacking faults, as well as double and triple dislocation complexes. It tracks how the independent elastic stiffness constants C11, C12, and C44 shift when defect density rises, then derives the effective bulk, shear, and Young's moduli both along specific directions and through Voigt-Reuss-Hill averaging. The central finding is a steady drop in overall stiffness that grows with defect concentration, although triple complexes cause smaller shifts than the others. A reader would care because even modest changes in these moduli can affect how the material behaves under load in electronics or structural uses where 3C-SiC is already employed.

Core claim

Large-scale molecular dynamics simulations performed with the Vashishta potential and the analytic bond-order potential quantify the effect of increasing densities of Shockley partial dislocations terminating stacking faults and of double and triple dislocation complexes on the elastic stiffness constants C11, C12, and C44 of 3C-SiC. From the altered constants the study computes direction-specific and orientation-averaged bulk, shear, and Young's moduli, establishing a general reduction in material stiffness whose magnitude depends on defect type and reaches up to approximately 6 percent with the Vashishta potential and 4 percent with the ABOP, with triple complexes producing the smallest of

What carries the argument

Molecular dynamics simulations of supercells containing Shockley partial dislocations, stacking faults, and dislocation complexes that compute changes in the elastic stiffness constants C11, C12, and C44 as defect density varies.

Load-bearing premise

The Vashishta and ABOP interatomic potentials accurately reproduce the elastic response of 3C-SiC when these extended defects are present, and the simulated defect concentrations and geometries represent those found in real crystals.

What would settle it

Experimental measurements of the elastic moduli of 3C-SiC samples whose densities of Shockley partial dislocations and dislocation complexes have been independently quantified, showing either no reduction or reductions outside the 4-6 percent range predicted by the simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06574 by Andrey Sarikov, Serhii Shmahlii.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: presents the values of the independent elastic constants simulated using Vashishta potential and ABOP. As can be seen from view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Young’s modulus E and (b) shear modulus G in directions defined by extended defect geometries. According to view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Universal elastic anisotropy index obtained with (a) Vashishta potential and (b) ABOP view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effect of extended defects on VRH averaged bulk modulus obtained with (a) Vashishta potential and (b) ABOP view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effect of extended defects on VRH averaged shear modulus obtained with (a) Vashishta potential and (b) ABOP. For different defect configurations, the VRH averaged Young’s modulus ranges between 314- 330 GPa for the Vashishta potential and between 420-430 GPa for ABOP. The VRH averaged values of the shear modulus lie within 125-131 GPa and 178-181 GPa obtained with Vashishta potential and ABOP, respectively… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Effect of extended defects on the Debye temperature of 3C-SiC obtained with (a) Vashishta potential and (b) ABOP. For single-crystalline or high-quality epitaxial 3C-SiC, the experimental room-temperature Young’s modulus typically lies in the range of 400-450 GPa, as reported for high-quality films and micropillar structures [39, 41, 43]. The corresponding shear modulus is generally of the order of ~180- 2… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this study, large-scale molecular dynamics simulations with the Vashishta potential and the analytic bond-order potential (ABOP) were performed to investigate the effect of extended defects on the elastic properties of cubic silicon carbide (3C-SiC). Specifically, we focused on systems containing Shockley partial dislocations terminating stacking faults, along with double and triple dislocation complexes. The changes in the independent elastic stiffness constants C11, C12 and C44 upon varying the mentioned extended defects concentrations were quantified. Using the values of these constants, the effective bulk, shear, and Young's moduli were calculated for different defect types and concentrations. The moduli were calculated along particular crystallographic directions aligned with the mentioned defect configurations as well as evaluated using Voigt-Reuss-Hill averaging to provide overall orientation-independent characterization of the defect-altered lattice. The obtained results reveal a general trend of diminishing the material's stiffness with increasing densities of Shockley partial dislocations and dislocation complexes. Depending on the defect configuration, the average elastic moduli decrease by up to approximately 6 % with the Vashishta potential and up to about 4 % using the analytic bond-order potential. At this, triple dislocation complexes induce smaller perturbations. These findings demonstrate that extended defect networks can measurably modify the elastic response of 3C-SiC and should be considered in further scientific research and practical applications of this material.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports large-scale molecular dynamics simulations of 3C-SiC using the Vashishta potential and the analytic bond-order potential (ABOP). It quantifies the effect of Shockley partial dislocations terminating stacking faults, as well as double and triple dislocation complexes, on the independent elastic constants C11, C12, and C44. Derived bulk, shear, and Young's moduli are computed both along defect-aligned directions and via Voigt-Reuss-Hill averaging. The central result is a systematic softening trend, with average moduli reductions reaching up to ~6% (Vashishta) or ~4% (ABOP) as defect density increases; triple complexes produce smaller perturbations.

Significance. If the potentials accurately capture the long-range strain fields and local bonding changes around extended defects, the work demonstrates that realistic defect networks can produce measurable (few-percent) changes in the elastic response of 3C-SiC. This is relevant for device modeling in high-power electronics where defect densities vary. The use of two independent potentials supplies a limited internal consistency check, though the absence of higher-fidelity benchmarks or experimental anchors limits broader impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods / Potential selection] The transferability of both the Vashishta and ABOP potentials to configurations containing extended defects is not demonstrated. These potentials are typically parameterized against perfect-crystal elastic constants, phonon spectra, or point defects; their ability to reproduce the elastic softening induced by Shockley partials, stacking faults, and dislocation complexes therefore remains an untested extrapolation. Without side-by-side DFT calculations on identical defective supercells, the reported percentage reductions cannot be confidently attributed to physical behavior rather than functional-form artifacts.
  2. [Methods / Simulation details] Essential simulation-protocol details are missing: supercell dimensions, number of atoms, equilibration protocols (temperature, pressure, time), the precise strain-deformation procedure used to extract C11, C12, and C44 in the presence of defects, and any statistical error estimation or convergence tests. These omissions prevent independent assessment of whether the quoted 4–6 % changes exceed numerical uncertainty.
  3. [Results / Discussion] No direct comparison is made to experimental elastic moduli of 3C-SiC samples whose defect densities have been independently characterized (e.g., by TEM). Such a benchmark would be required to establish that the simulated defect concentrations and geometries are representative of real crystals.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] Clarify whether the reported moduli reductions are obtained from single realizations or averaged over multiple independent defect placements; if the latter, state the number of samples and the observed scatter.
  2. [Abstract / Results] The abstract states “up to approximately 6 %” and “up to about 4 %”; the main text should tabulate the exact defect densities at which these maxima occur and the corresponding Voigt-Reuss-Hill values for each potential.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the work while acknowledging where revisions are warranted. The revised manuscript incorporates clarifications and additional discussion as described.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / Potential selection] The transferability of both the Vashishta and ABOP potentials to configurations containing extended defects is not demonstrated. These potentials are typically parameterized against perfect-crystal elastic constants, phonon spectra, or point defects; their ability to reproduce the elastic softening induced by Shockley partials, stacking faults, and dislocation complexes therefore remains an untested extrapolation. Without side-by-side DFT calculations on identical defective supercells, the reported percentage reductions cannot be confidently attributed to physical behavior rather than functional-form artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that direct DFT benchmarks on the exact defective supercells would provide the strongest possible validation. The Vashishta and ABOP potentials were chosen because they have been extensively validated in the literature for SiC elastic constants, phonon spectra, and various defect structures (including stacking faults and dislocations), and they enable the large-scale simulations required here. Large DFT calculations on systems with ~10^5–10^6 atoms containing extended defects remain computationally prohibitive. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Methods section with additional references to prior validation studies of these potentials on defective SiC and have added an explicit limitations paragraph stating that the reported softening trends should be viewed as potential-dependent predictions pending higher-fidelity confirmation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods / Simulation details] Essential simulation-protocol details are missing: supercell dimensions, number of atoms, equilibration protocols (temperature, pressure, time), the precise strain-deformation procedure used to extract C11, C12, and C44 in the presence of defects, and any statistical error estimation or convergence tests. These omissions prevent independent assessment of whether the quoted 4–6 % changes exceed numerical uncertainty.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that these technical details were omitted. We have added a dedicated Methods subsection in the revised manuscript that reports: supercell sizes of approximately 25 nm × 25 nm × 25 nm containing 1.2–1.5 million atoms; equilibration in the NPT ensemble at 300 K and zero pressure for 100 ps using a 1 fs timestep; the strain procedure of applying six independent 0.05 % affine deformations along the principal axes and computing the resulting stress tensor via the virial formula; and statistical uncertainties obtained from five independent runs with standard deviations shown as error bars on all reported moduli. Convergence with respect to system size and strain magnitude was verified and is now documented. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Results / Discussion] No direct comparison is made to experimental elastic moduli of 3C-SiC samples whose defect densities have been independently characterized (e.g., by TEM). Such a benchmark would be required to establish that the simulated defect concentrations and geometries are representative of real crystals.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a direct experimental benchmark would be desirable. Our study is a controlled computational investigation that isolates the effect of specific extended-defect configurations at well-defined densities; experimental samples typically contain mixed defect populations whose densities are difficult to quantify precisely. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph in the Discussion that cites available experimental literature on elastic softening in defective 3C-SiC and notes that the magnitude of our predicted reductions (4–6 %) is consistent with the range of stiffness reductions reported for high-defect-density epitaxial films. We also state that quantitative one-to-one comparison lies beyond the scope of the present work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct MD simulation outputs of elastic constants

full rationale

The paper runs large-scale molecular dynamics with Vashishta and ABOP potentials on explicitly constructed supercells containing Shockley partials, stacking faults, and dislocation complexes. Elastic stiffness constants C11, C12, C44 are computed directly from the simulated stress-strain response; bulk, shear, and Young's moduli (including Voigt-Reuss-Hill averages) are then obtained via standard linear-elastic formulas. No parameters are fitted to the target defect-induced softening percentages, no equations reduce the reported 4-6 % drops to the input potentials or defect geometries by construction, and no self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps. The workflow is a forward numerical experiment whose results are independent of the final claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim depends on the domain assumption that the two empirical potentials faithfully capture defect-induced changes in elastic response; no new entities or fitted parameters are introduced in the reported work.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Vashishta potential and analytic bond-order potential accurately describe atomic interactions and elastic behavior in defective 3C-SiC.
    Invoked to generate all force and energy data in the molecular dynamics runs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5549 in / 1246 out tokens · 48125 ms · 2026-05-08T08:32:32.937998+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Kimoto, J

    T. Kimoto, J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology: Growth, Characterization, Devices, and Applications, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014

    2014

  2. [2]

    La Via, A

    F. La Via, A. Severino, R. Anzalone, C. Bongiorno, G. Litrico, M. Mauceri, M. Schoeler, P. Schuh, P. Wellmann, From thin film to bulk 3C -SiC growth: Understanding the mechanism of defects reduction, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 78, 57 -68 (2018). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2017.12.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mssp.2017.12.012 2018

  3. [3]

    La Via, D

    F. La Via, D. Alquier, F. Giannazzo, T. Kimoto, P. Neudeck, H. Ou, A. Roncaglia, S. E. Saddow, S. Tudisco, Emerging SiC applications beyond power electronic devices. Micromachines 14, 1200 (2023). http://doi.org/10.3390/mi14061200

    work page doi:10.3390/mi14061200 2023

  4. [4]

    Atkinson, A

    C. Atkinson, A. K. Head, The influence of elastic anisotropy on the propagation of fractur e, Int. J. Fracture 2, 489-505 (1966). http://doi.org/10.1007/BF00193688

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00193688 1966

  5. [5]

    Scuderi, C

    V. Scuderi, C. Calabretta, R. Anzalone, M. Mauceri, F. La Via, Characterization of 4H - and 6H- like stacking faults in 3C -SiC epitaxial layers , Materials 13, 1837 (2020). http://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081837

    work page doi:10.3390/ma13081837 2020

  6. [6]

    Zimbone, A

    M. Zimbone, A. Sarikov, C. Bongiorno, A. Marzegalli, V. Scuderi, C. Calabretta, L. Miglio, F. La Via, Extended defects in 3C -SiC: Stacking faults, threading partial dislocations, and inverted domain boundaries, Acta Mater. 213, 116915 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116915

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116915 2021

  7. [7]

    Méndez, A

    D. Méndez, A. Aouni, F. M. Morales, F. J. Pacheco, D. Araújo, E. Bustarret, G. Ferro, Y. Monteil, Defect morphology and strain of CVD grown 3C -SiC layers: Effect of the carbonization process , Phys. Stat. Solidi A 202, 561-565 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.200460421

    work page doi:10.1002/pssa.200460421 2005

  8. [8]

    Kaiser, I

    U. Kaiser, I. Khodos, On the determination of partial dislocation Burgers vectors in fcc lattices and its application to cubic SiC films , Phil. Mag. A 82, 541 -551 (2002). http://doi.org/10.1080/01418610208239615

    work page doi:10.1080/01418610208239615 2002

  9. [9]

    C. Wen, Y. M. Wang, W. Wan, F. H. Li, J. W. Liang, J. Zou, Nature of interfacial defects and their roles in strain relaxation at highly lattice mismatched 3C-SiC/Si(001) interface, J. Appl. Phys. 106, 073522 (2009). http://doi.org/10.1063/1.3234380

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3234380 2009

  10. [10]

    Sarikov, A

    A. Sarikov, A. Marzegalli, L. Barbisan, M. Zimbone, C. Bongiorno, M. Mauceri, D. Crippa, F. La Via, L. Miglio, Mechanism of stacking fault annihilation in 3C-SiC epitaxially grown on Si(001) by molecular dynamics simulations , CrystEngComm 23, 1566 -1571 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1039/D0CE01613F

    work page doi:10.1039/d0ce01613f 2021

  11. [11]

    La Via, M

    F. La Via, M. Zimbone, C. Bongiorno, A. La Magna, G. Fisicaro, I. Deretzis, V. Scuderi, C. Calabretta, F. Giannazzo, M. Zielinski, R. Anzalone, M. Mauceri, D. Crippa, E. Scalise, A. Marzegalli, A. Sarikov, L. Miglio, V. Jokubavicius, M. Syväjärvi, R. Yakimova, P. Schuh, M. Schöler, M. Kollmuss, P. Wellmann, New approaches and understandings in the growth ...

    work page doi:10.3390/ma14185348 2021

  12. [12]

    Lancin, C

    M. Lancin, C. Ragaru, C. Godon, Atomic structure and core composition of partial dislocations and dislocation fronts in β -SiC, Phil. Mag. B 81, 1633 -1647 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/13642810108223108

    work page doi:10.1080/13642810108223108 2001

  13. [13]

    Sarikov, A

    A. Sarikov, A. Marzegalli, L. Barbisan, F. Montalenti, L. Miglio, Structure and stability of partial dislocation complexes in 3C-SiC, Materials 12, 3027 (2019). http://doi.org/10.3390/ma12183027

    work page doi:10.3390/ma12183027 2019

  14. [14]

    Scalise, L

    E. Scalise, L. Barbisan, A. Sarikov, F. Montalenti, L. Miglio, A. Marzegalli, The origin and nature of killer defects in 3C -SiC, J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 7323 -7330 (2020). http://doi.org/10.1039/d0tc00909a

    work page doi:10.1039/d0tc00909a 2020

  15. [15]

    Shmahlii, A

    S. Shmahlii, A. Sarikov, Influence of extended defects on melting behavior of 3C-SiC by molecular dynamics simulations , Semicond. Phys., Quant . Electr. & Optoelectr. 27, 389 -396 (2024). http://doi.org/10.15407/spqeo27.04.389

    work page doi:10.15407/spqeo27.04.389 2024

  16. [16]

    F. Gao, W. J. Weber, Mechanical properties and elastic constants due to damage accumulation and amorphization in SiC , Phys. Rev. B 69, 224108 ( 2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.224108

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.69.224108 2004

  17. [17]

    A novel single-crystal & single-pass source for polarisation- and colour-entangled photon pairs,

    M. Jiang, J. W. Zheng, H. Y. Xiao, X. T. Zu, A comparative study of the mechanical and thermal properties of defective ZrC , TiC and SiC , Sci. Rep. 7, 9344 (2017). http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598- 017-09562-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598- 2017

  18. [18]

    Hirth, J

    J. Hirth, J. Lothe, Theory of Dislocations, second ed., Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL, USA, 1982

    1982

  19. [19]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolintineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. in ’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen, R. Shan, M. J. Stevens, J. Tranchida, C. Trott, S. J. Plimpton, LAMMPS: A flexible simulation tool for particle -based materials modeling. Computer Physics Communications 271, 108171 (2022). http://doi.org/10...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 2022

  20. [20]

    Sarikov, A

    A. Sarikov, A. Marzegalli, L. Barbisan, E. Scalise, F. Montalenti, L. Miglio, Molecular dynamics simulations of extended defects in 3C -SiC, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 28, 015002 (2019). http://doi.org/10.1088/1361-651x/ab50c7

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-651x/ab50c7 2019

  21. [21]

    Visualization and Analysis of Atomistic Simulation Data with

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO , Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 015012 (2009). http://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012

    work page doi:10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 2009

  22. [22]

    J. F. Nye, Physical Properties of Crystals, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1985

    1985

  23. [23]

    A. F. Bower, Applied Mechanics of Solids, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2009

    2009

  24. [24]

    Mouhat, F.-X

    F. Mouhat, F.-X. Coudert, Necessary and sufficient elastic stability conditio ns, Phys. Rev. B 90, 224104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224104

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.224104 2014

  25. [25]

    D. F. Slaughter, The Linearized Theory of Elasticity, Birkhäuser, Boston, MA, USA, 2002

    2002

  26. [26]

    T. C. T. Ting, Anisotropic Elasticity: Theory and Applications; Oxford University P ress, New York, USA, 1996

    1996

  27. [27]

    Hill, The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate, Proc

    R. Hill, The elastic behaviour of a crystalline aggregate, Proc. Phys. Soc. A 65, 349-354 (1952)

    1952

  28. [28]

    D. H. Chung, W. R. Buessem, The Voigt–Reuss–Hill approximation, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 2777-2782 (1968). http://doi.org/10.1063/1.1656672

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1656672 1968

  29. [29]

    S. I. Ranganathan, M. Ostoja-Starzewski, Universal elastic anisotropy index, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 055504 (2008). https://:doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.055504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.055504 2008

  30. [30]

    Pizzagalli, Accurate values of SiC elastic constants , Phil

    L. Pizzagalli, Accurate values of SiC elastic constants , Phil. Mag. Lett. 101, 242 -252 (2021). http://doi.org/10.1080/09500839.2021.1909167

    work page doi:10.1080/09500839.2021.1909167 2021

  31. [31]

    Djemia, Y

    P. Djemia, Y. Roussigné, G. Dirras, K. Jackson, Elastic properties of β-SiC films, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 2324-2330 (2004). http://doi.org/10.1063/1.1645972

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1645972 2004

  32. [32]

    Jeong, S

    B. Jeong, S. Lahkar, Q. An, K. M. Reddy, Mechanical properties of nanocrystalline ceramics , Nanomaterials 12, 3228 (2022). http://doi.org/10.3390/nano12183228

    work page doi:10.3390/nano12183228 2022

  33. [33]

    S. Goel, A. Stukowski, X. Luo, A. Agrawal, R. L. Reuben, Anisotropy of single -crystal 3C-SiC, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 21, 065004 (2013). http://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/21/6/065004

    work page doi:10.1088/0965-0393/21/6/065004 2013

  34. [34]

    N. M. Sultan, T. M. B. Albarody, H. K. M. Al-Jothery, M. A. Abdullah, H. G. Mohammed, K. O. Obodo, Thermal expansion of 3C -SiC, Materials 15, 6229 (2022). http://doi.org/10.3390/ma15186229

    work page doi:10.3390/ma15186229 2022

  35. [35]

    H. Wang, R. N. Singh, J. S. Goela, Effects of postdeposition treatments , J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2437-2442 (1995). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08682.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08682.x 1995

  36. [36]

    B. O. Yavuz, R. E. Tressler, High temperature mechanical behavior of β-SiC, Ceram. Int. 18, 19-26 (1992). http://doi.org/10.1016/0272-8842(92)90057-K

    work page doi:10.1016/0272-8842(92)90057-k 1992

  37. [37]

    Katoh, L

    Y. Katoh, L. L. Snead, Mechanical properties after neutron irradiation , J. ASTM Int . 2, 12377 (2005). http://doi.org/10.1520/JAI12377

    work page doi:10.1520/jai12377 2005

  38. [38]

    M. C. Osborne, J. C. Hay, L. L. Snead, D. Steiner, Property changes of irradiated SiC , J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 82, 2490-2496 (1999). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02107.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02107.x 1999

  39. [39]

    J. D. Reddy, A. A. Volinsky, C. L. Frewin, C. Locke, S. E. Saddow, Mechanical properties of 3C - SiC films for MEMS, MRS Proc. 1049, 306 (2007). http://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-1049-AA03-06

    work page doi:10.1557/proc-1049-aa03-06 2007

  40. [40]

    Locke, G

    C. Locke, G. Kravchenko, P. Waters, M. Mehregany, L. G. Matus, S. E. Saddow, 3C-SiC films on Si for MEMS , Mater. Sci. Forum 615-617, 633 -636 (2009). http://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.615-617.633

    work page doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.615-617.633 2009

  41. [41]

    L. Tong, M. Mehregany, L. G. Matus, Mechanical properties of 3C -SiC. Appl . Phys. Lett. 60, 2992-2994 (1992). http://doi.org/10.1063/1.106786

    work page doi:10.1063/1.106786 1992

  42. [42]

    K. M. Jackson, R. L. Edwards, G. F. Dirras, W. N. Sharpe, Mechanical properties of thin film Si C, MRS Proc. 687, 63 (2001). http://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-687-B6.3

    work page doi:10.1557/proc-687-b6.3 2001

  43. [43]

    Shin, H.-H

    C. Shin, H.-H. Jin, W.-J. Kim, J.-Y. Park, Mechanical properties of SiC micropillars , J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 95, 2944-2950 (2012). http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05346.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05346.x 2012

  44. [44]

    Y. V. Milman, S. I. Chugunova, I. V. Goncharova, T. Chudoba, W. Lojkowski, W. Gooch, Temperature dependence of hardness in silicon –carbide ce ramics, Int. J. Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 17, 361-368 (1999). http://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-4368(99)00022-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0263-4368(99)00022-0 1999