arxiv: 2605.06653 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

From Baby Universes to Narain Moduli: Topological Boundary Averaging in SymTFTs

Xingyang Yu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords SymTFTensemble averagingholographytopological boundary conditionsNarain moduliMarolf-Maxfield modelZamolodchikov measurebaby universes

0 comments

The pith

Ensemble averaging in low-dimensional holography arises from averaging over topological boundary conditions at one end of a fixed SymTFT slab while holding the physical boundary fixed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes reinterpreting ensemble averages in holography by fixing the Symmetry Topological Field Theory and its physical boundary condition while summing over different topological boundary conditions at the opposite end of the slab. Each such choice completes the same relative theory in a distinct absolute way, so the ensemble becomes an average over topological completions instead of over varying local dynamics. This is implemented through cap functionals equipped with groupoid or Haar-type measures on the space of topological boundaries. A sympathetic reader would care because the construction recovers known measures in concrete models without introducing new dynamical assumptions.

Core claim

By holding the SymTFT and physical boundary fixed and averaging over topological boundary conditions, the ensemble in low-dimensional holography is recast as a sum over absolute completions of one relative theory. In the closed-string sector of the Marolf-Maxfield model the topological boundaries are labeled by finite sets and the groupoid sum reproduces the Poisson and Bell-polynomial moments. In the Narain case, compact topological boundaries of an R-valued BF SymTFT correspond to maximal isotropic subgroups, so the averaging procedure yields the standard Narain moduli integral with the Zamolodchikov measure.

What carries the argument

The cap functional together with its groupoid or Haar-type measure on topological boundary conditions of a SymTFT slab, which performs the ensemble average by summing over absolute completions while the physical boundary remains fixed.

If this is right

In the Marolf-Maxfield model the sum over finite-set labels for topological boundaries produces the Poisson and Bell-polynomial moments that encode baby-universe effects.
For Narain CFTs the identification of topological boundaries with maximal isotropic subgroups directly yields the Zamolodchikov measure on the moduli space.
The same topological-boundary averaging supplies a uniform mechanism that can be applied to other low-dimensional holographic ensembles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This view recasts ensemble averaging as a consequence of leaving the absolute theory unspecified within a relative SymTFT framework.
Similar averaging over topological completions in higher-dimensional SymTFTs could be tested to see whether it reproduces known ensemble measures in AdS/CFT settings.
Baby-universe phenomena might then be understood as arising from choices of topological completion rather than from explicit dynamical fluctuations.

Load-bearing premise

The groupoid or Haar-type measures on topological boundary conditions reproduce the physically relevant ensemble measures such as Poisson polynomials and the Zamolodchikov measure without additional fitting or selection rules.

What would settle it

An explicit computation showing that the sum over maximal isotropic subgroups in the R-valued BF SymTFT does not recover the known integral over Narain moduli space with the Zamolodchikov measure would falsify the proposed interpretation.

read the original abstract

We propose a SymTFT interpretation of ensemble averaging in low-dimensional holography. The central operation is to keep fixed both the SymTFT and the physical boundary condition, while averaging over topological boundary conditions at the other end of the SymTFT slab. Each such boundary condition gives an absolute completion of the same relative theory, so the ensemble is interpreted as an average over topological completions rather than over arbitrary local dynamics. We formulate this construction in terms of cap functionals and their natural groupoid or Haar-type measures, and illustrate it in two examples. In the closed-string sector of the Marolf--Maxfield model, topological boundary conditions are labelled by finite sets, and the groupoid sum reproduces the Poisson/Bell-polynomial moments. In the Narain case, compact topological boundary conditions of an $\mathbb{R}$-valued BF SymTFT are identified with maximal isotropic subgroups, so that topological-boundary averaging becomes the usual Narain moduli average with Zamolodchikov measure. We also discuss possible extensions to JT gravity, random matrix theory, Virasoro T(Q)FT, and 3D gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reframes ensemble averaging in low-dim holography as averaging over topological boundary conditions in a fixed SymTFT slab.

read the letter

The paper proposes interpreting ensemble averaging in low-dimensional holography as averaging over topological boundary conditions in a SymTFT setup. You fix the SymTFT and the physical boundary, then sum over different topological completions at the far end using cap functionals and groupoid or Haar measures. This move looks new. It recovers the Poisson and Bell-polynomial moments for the Marolf-Maxfield model when boundaries are finite sets, and it gives the Zamolodchikov measure for Narain moduli when the boundaries are maximal isotropic subgroups of the BF theory. The construction is internally consistent and ties together baby-universe statistics with Narain averages under one roof. It does well at providing a uniform topological mechanism that could extend to JT gravity and 3D gravity. The examples serve as checks that the chosen measures match known results. The main soft spot is that the reproduction of the physical measures relies on selecting the appropriate groupoid or Haar measures, and while the paper presents this as natural, more explicit derivations would strengthen the case that no extra fitting is involved. The abstract does not show the full calculations, so the strength depends on how detailed the full text is. This work is for specialists in holographic ensemble averages and symmetry topological field theories. A reader in that area will find the new framing useful for organizing existing results. I recommend sending it to peer review. It offers a coherent perspective worth referee input, even if revisions might be needed to expand the derivations.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a SymTFT interpretation of ensemble averaging in low-dimensional holography. The central operation is to keep fixed both the SymTFT and the physical boundary condition, while averaging over topological boundary conditions at the other end of the SymTFT slab. Each such boundary condition gives an absolute completion of the same relative theory, so the ensemble is interpreted as an average over topological completions rather than over arbitrary local dynamics. The construction is formulated in terms of cap functionals and their natural groupoid or Haar-type measures, and illustrated in two examples: in the closed-string sector of the Marolf-Maxfield model, topological boundary conditions are labelled by finite sets and the groupoid sum reproduces the Poisson/Bell-polynomial moments; in the Narain case, compact topological boundary conditions of an R-valued BF SymTFT are identified with maximal isotropic subgroups, so that topological-boundary averaging becomes the usual Narain moduli average with Zamolodchikov measure. Possible extensions to JT gravity, random matrix theory, Virasoro T(Q)FT, and 3D gravity are discussed.

Significance. If the proposed measures on topological boundary conditions indeed reproduce the known ensemble averages without additional fitting or selection rules, this provides a significant conceptual unification by recasting ensemble averaging as a topological operation within SymTFT. It links the baby-universe interpretation in 2D models to the Narain moduli averaging in string theory and supplies a framework that could be applied to other holographic ensembles. The approach is parameter-free in its core construction and builds directly on existing SymTFT tools.

major comments (2)

[Marolf-Maxfield model illustration] Marolf-Maxfield illustration: the central claim that the groupoid sum over finite-set topological boundary conditions reproduces the Poisson/Bell-polynomial moments is load-bearing, yet the manuscript presents this as a check without an explicit derivation of the sum or verification that the measure choice is natural rather than fitted. The step-by-step computation showing how the groupoid measure yields the known moments should be supplied.
[Narain case] Narain BF SymTFT example: the identification of compact topological boundary conditions with maximal isotropic subgroups and the assertion that the Haar-type measure reproduces the Zamolodchikov measure exactly is load-bearing for the proposal, but the explicit matching (including any assumptions on the measure) is not derived in detail. A concrete computation confirming the equivalence without post-hoc adjustments is required.

minor comments (2)

[Formulation section] The definition and properties of cap functionals could be recalled or referenced more explicitly in the main text for readers who may not be familiar with the SymTFT literature.
[Discussion] The discussion of possible extensions (JT gravity, 3D gravity) is brief; a short paragraph outlining how the construction would apply in one of these cases would improve readability without altering the scope.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the conceptual framework, and constructive suggestions for strengthening the illustrative examples. We agree that explicit derivations are needed to make the load-bearing claims fully transparent. The revised manuscript incorporates detailed step-by-step computations for both examples, confirming that the measures arise canonically from the SymTFT construction without fitting. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Marolf-Maxfield model illustration] Marolf-Maxfield illustration: the central claim that the groupoid sum over finite-set topological boundary conditions reproduces the Poisson/Bell-polynomial moments is load-bearing, yet the manuscript presents this as a check without an explicit derivation of the sum or verification that the measure choice is natural rather than fitted. The step-by-step computation showing how the groupoid measure yields the known moments should be supplied.

Authors: We agree that the original presentation stated the reproduction but omitted a fully expanded derivation. In the revised manuscript we have inserted a dedicated subsection that performs the computation explicitly. Topological boundary conditions are objects of the groupoid FinSet of finite sets with bijections as morphisms. The cap functional induces the natural groupoid measure that sums over isomorphism classes with weight 1/|Aut(S)|. Expanding the resulting exponential generating function directly produces the Bell polynomials B_n(x) whose coefficients are the Poisson moments of the Marolf-Maxfield ensemble. No auxiliary selection rules or parameter tuning are introduced; the measure is the unique (up to overall normalization) Haar-type measure on the groupoid that is compatible with the SymTFT cobordism axioms. revision: yes
Referee: [Narain case] Narain BF SymTFT example: the identification of compact topological boundary conditions with maximal isotropic subgroups and the assertion that the Haar-type measure reproduces the Zamolodchikov measure exactly is load-bearing for the proposal, but the explicit matching (including any assumptions on the measure) is not derived in detail. A concrete computation confirming the equivalence without post-hoc adjustments is required.

Authors: We concur that a concrete matching computation is required. The revised manuscript now contains an expanded section that carries out the identification and measure comparison in detail. Compact topological boundary conditions of the R-valued BF SymTFT are in one-to-one correspondence with maximal isotropic subgroups L of the underlying even unimodular lattice. The space of such subgroups carries a unique (up to scalar) Haar measure invariant under the automorphism group of the SymTFT. Pushing this measure forward via the natural map that sends L to the Narain modulus (the choice of positive-definite metric on the orthogonal complement) reproduces the Zamolodchikov measure on the Narain moduli space exactly. The only assumptions are the standard invariance and normalization properties of Haar measure on the relevant homogeneous space; no additional fitting is performed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper introduces a SymTFT interpretation of ensemble averaging via averaging over topological boundary conditions (using cap functionals and groupoid/Haar measures) while fixing the SymTFT and physical boundary. This is formulated as a new construction, with the Marolf-Maxfield and Narain examples presented explicitly as illustrations that recover known measures (Poisson/Bell polynomials and Zamolodchikov) as consistency checks. No load-bearing derivation step reduces by the paper's equations to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as prediction, or a self-citation chain; the central claim supplies independent conceptual content and does not tautologically reproduce its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal relies on the existence of well-defined groupoid/Haar measures on the space of topological boundary conditions and on the identification of those boundaries with finite sets or maximal isotropic subgroups; these are introduced as part of the construction.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Topological boundary conditions of a fixed SymTFT form a groupoid whose natural measure reproduces the ensemble statistics of the physical theory.
Invoked when defining the averaging operation and when claiming reproduction of Poisson and Zamolodchikov measures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5494 in / 1416 out tokens · 40169 ms · 2026-05-08T07:35:39.402572+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 285 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Greenwade

George D. Greenwade. The C omprehensive T ex A rchive N etwork ( CTAN ). TUGBoat. 1993

1993
[2]

and Turner, Andrew P

Heckman, Jonathan J. and Turner, Andrew P. and Yu, Xingyang. Disorder averaging and its UV discontents. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.086021. arXiv:2111.06404

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.086021 2022
[3]

A geometric approach to boundaries and surface defects in Dijkgraaf-Witten theories

Fuchs, J. A geometric approach to boundaries and surface defects in Dijkgraaf-Witten theories. Commun. Math. Phys. 2014. doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2067-0. arXiv:1307.3632

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-014-2067-0 2014
[4]

Cordova, D

Cordova, Clay and Costa, Davi B. and Hsin, Po-Shen. Non-Invertible Symmetries as Condensation Defects in Finite-Group Gauge Theories. 2024. arXiv:2412.16681

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

Non-invertible symmetries in finite-group gauge theory

Cordova, Clay and Costa, Davi Bastos and Hsin, Po-Shen. Non-invertible symmetries in finite-group gauge theory. SciPost Phys. 2025. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.18.1.019. arXiv:2407.07964

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.18.1.019 2025
[6]

and Zhang, Zipei

Xue, Yuan and Yang, Eric Y. and Zhang, Zipei. On Gauging Finite Symmetries by Higher Gauging Condensation Defects. 2025. arXiv:2512.22440

work page arXiv 2025
[7]

2011 , publisher=

Nonabelian Algebraic Topology: Filtered Spaces, Crossed Complexes, Cubical Homotopy Groupoids , author=. 2011 , publisher=

2011
[8]

Hamiltonian and Algebraic Theories of Gapped Boundaries in Topological Phases of Matter

Cong, Iris and Cheng, Meng and Wang, Zhenghan. Hamiltonian and Algebraic Theories of Gapped Boundaries in Topological Phases of Matter. Commun. Math. Phys. 2017. doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2960-4. arXiv:1707.04564

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-017-2960-4 2017
[9]

Von Neumann Subfactors and Non-Invertible Symmetries

Yu, Xingyang and Zhang, Hao Y. Von Neumann Subfactors and Non-Invertible Symmetries. SciPost Phys. 2025. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.6.154. arXiv:2504.05374

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.19.6.154 2025
[10]

Perez-Lona, D

Perez-Lona, Alonso and Robbins, Daniel and Sharpe, Eric and Vandermeulen, Thomas and Yu, Xingyang. Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part II. Higher multiplicity cases. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2025)066. arXiv:2408.16811

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2025)066 2025
[11]

2017 , issn =

On Lagrangian Algebras in Group-Theoretical Braided Fusion Categories , journal =. 2017 , issn =. 1603.04650 , archivePrefix=

work page arXiv 2017
[12]

Robbins and S

Robbins, Daniel and Roy, Subham. SymTFT actions, Condensable algebras and Categorical anomaly resolutions. 2025. arXiv:2509.05408

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects

Lawrie, Craig and Yu, Xingyang and Zhang, Hao Y. Intermediate defect groups, polarization pairs, and noninvertible duality defects. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.026005. arXiv:2306.11783

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.026005 2024
[14]

Perez-Lona, D

Perez-Lona, A. and Robbins, D. and Sharpe, E. and Vandermeulen, T. and Yu, X. Notes on gauging noninvertible symmetries. Part I. Multiplicity-free cases. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2024)154. arXiv:2311.16230

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2024)154 2024
[15]

A universal circuit set using the S _ 3 quantum double

Chen, Liyuan and Ren, Yuanjie and Fan, Ruihua and Jaffe, Arthur. A universal circuit set using the S _ 3 quantum double. npj Quantum Inf. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01063-4. arXiv:2411.09697

work page doi:10.1038/s41534-025-01063-4 2025
[16]

Topological interactions in broken gauge theories

de Wild Propitius, Mark Dirk Frederik. Topological interactions in broken gauge theories. 1995. arXiv:hep-th/9511195

work page Pith review arXiv 1995
[17]

Generalized Global Symmetries of T[M] Theories: Part II

Gukov, Sergei and Hsin, Po-Shen and Pei, Du and Park, Sunghyuk. Generalized Global Symmetries of T[M] Theories: Part II. 2025. arXiv:2511.13696

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective

Yu, Xingyang. Gauging in parameter space: A top-down perspective. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/638n-qwnm. arXiv:2411.14997

work page doi:10.1103/638n-qwnm 2025
[19]

Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries

Antinucci, Andrea and Benini, Francesco. Anomalies and gauging of U(1) symmetries. Phys. Rev. B. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.111.024110. arXiv:2401.10165

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.111.024110 2025
[20]

Kong and X.-G

Kong, Liang and Wen, Xiao-Gang. Braided fusion categories, gravitational anomalies, and the mathematical framework for topological orders in any dimensions. 2014. arXiv:1405.5858

work page arXiv 2014
[21]

Boundary-bulk relation in topological orders

Kong, Liang and Wen, Xiao-Gang and Zheng, Hao. Boundary-bulk relation in topological orders. Nucl. Phys. B. 2017. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.06.023. arXiv:1702.00673

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2017.06.023 2017
[22]

Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry -- a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry

Kong, Liang and Lan, Tian and Wen, Xiao-Gang and Zhang, Zhi-Hao and Zheng, Hao. Algebraic higher symmetry and categorical symmetry -- a holographic and entanglement view of symmetry. Phys. Rev. Res. 2020. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043086. arXiv:2005.14178

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043086 2020
[23]

and Yu, Matthew

D \'e coppet, Thibault D. and Yu, Matthew. Fiber 2-Functors and Tambara Yamagami Fusion 2-Categories. Commun. Math. Phys. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05249-x. arXiv:2306.08117

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05249-x 2025
[24]

Fusion 3-Categories for Duality Defects

Bhardwaj, Lakshya and D \'e coppet, Thibault and Schafer-Nameki, Sakura and Yu, Matthew. Fusion 3-Categories for Duality Defects. Commun. Math. Phys. 2025. doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05388-1. arXiv:2408.13302

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05388-1 2025
[25]

Heckman, Jonathan J. and H. On the holographic dual of a topological symmetry operator. Phys. Rev. D. 2024. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.046007. arXiv:2401.09538

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.046007 2024
[26]

2002 , eprint=

Combinatorics of Non-Abelian Gerbes with Connection and Curvature , author=. 2002 , eprint=

2002
[27]

2006 , eprint=

Higher Gauge Theory , author=. 2006 , eprint=

2006
[28]

Higher gauge theory and a non-Abelian generalization of 2-form electrodynamics , volume=

Pfeiffer, Hendryk , year=. Higher gauge theory and a non-Abelian generalization of 2-form electrodynamics , volume=. Annals of Physics , publisher=
[29]

Higher gauge theory—differential versus integral formulation , volume=

Girelli, Florian and Pfeiffer, Hendryk , year=. Higher gauge theory—differential versus integral formulation , volume=. Journal of Mathematical Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1063/1.1790048 , number=

work page doi:10.1063/1.1790048
[30]

Classification of

Lan, Tian and Kong, Liang and Wen, Xiao-Gang , journal =. Classification of. 2018 , month =

2018
[31]

Classification of 3+1

Lan, Tian and Wen, Xiao-Gang , journal =. Classification of 3+1. 2019 , month =

2019
[32]

On the Classification of Topological Orders

Johnson-Freyd, Theo. On the Classification of Topological Orders. Commun. Math. Phys. 2022. doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04380-3. arXiv:2003.06663

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04380-3 2022
[33]

Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI , volume=

Quantum groups , author=. Zapiski Nauchnykh Seminarov POMI , volume=. 1986 , publisher=

1986
[34]

The Classification of Fusion 2-Categories,

D \'e coppet, Thibault D. and Huston, Peter and Johnson-Freyd, Theo and Nikshych, Dmitri and Penneys, David and Plavnik, Julia and Reutter, David and Yu, Matthew. The Classification of Fusion 2-Categories. 2024. arXiv:2411.05907

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls

Kitaev, Alexei and Kong, Liang. Models for Gapped Boundaries and Domain Walls. Commun. Math. Phys. 2012. doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1500-5. arXiv:1104.5047

work page doi:10.1007/s00220-012-1500-5 2012
[36]

SymTFT Entanglement and Holographic (Non)-Factorization

Torres, Ethan and Yu, Xingyang. SymTFT Entanglement and Holographic (Non)-Factorization. 2025. arXiv:2510.06319

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

Generalized symmetries in 2D from string theory: SymTFTs, intrinsic relativeness, and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries

Franco, Sebastian and Yu, Xingyang. Generalized symmetries in 2D from string theory: SymTFTs, intrinsic relativeness, and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2024)004. arXiv:2404.19761

work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2024)004 2024
[38]

Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry

Jia, Qiang and Luo, Ran and Tian, Jiahua and Wang, Yi-Nan and Zhang, Yi. Symmetry Topological Field Theory for Flavor Symmetry. 2025. arXiv:2503.04546

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

Communications in Mathematical Physics , number =

Robbert Dijkgraaf and Edward Witten , title =. Communications in Mathematical Physics , number =
[41]

Boundary SymTFT

Bhardwaj, Lakshya and Copetti, Christian and Pajer, Daniel and Schafer-Nameki, Sakura. Boundary SymTFT. SciPost Phys. 2025. doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.19.2.061. arXiv:2409.02166

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.19.2.061 2025
[42]

Gagliano and I

Gagliano, Finn and Garc \' a Etxebarria, I \ n aki. SymTFTs for U(1) symmetries from descent. 2024. arXiv:2411.15126

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

Representation theory of solitons

Cordova, Clay and Holfester, Nicholas and Ohmori, Kantaro. Representation theory of solitons. JHEP. 2025. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2025)001. arXiv:2408.11045

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2025)001 2025
[44]

Daniel and Sun, Zhengdi

Brennan, T. Daniel and Sun, Zhengdi. A SymTFT for continuous symmetries. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)100. arXiv:2401.06128

work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2024)100 2024
[45]

Luo, Y.-N

Luo, Ran and Wang, Yi-Nan and Bi, Zhen. Topological Holography for Mixed-State Phases and Phase Transitions. 2025. arXiv:2507.06218

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Bonetti, M

Bonetti, Federico and Del Zotto, Michele and Minasian, Ruben. SymTFTs for Continuous non-Abelian Symmetries. 2024. arXiv:2402.12347

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory

Argurio, Riccardo and Benini, Francesco and Bertolini, Matteo and Galati, Giovanni and Niro, Pierluigi. On the symmetry TFT of Yang-Mills-Chern-Simons theory. JHEP. 2024. doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2024)130. arXiv:2404.06601

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2024)130 2024
[48]

2010 , eprint=

Turaev-Viro invariants as an extended TQFT , author=. 2010 , eprint=

2010
[49]

Field theories for gauged symmetry-protected topological phases: Non-Abelian anyons with Abelian gauge group Z_2^ 3

He, Huan and Zheng, Yunqin and von Keyserlingk, Curt. Field theories for gauged symmetry-protected topological phases: Non-Abelian anyons with Abelian gauge group Z_2^ 3. Phys. Rev. B. 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035131. arXiv:1608.05393

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.035131 2017
[50]

Apruzzi, F

Apruzzi, Fabio and Bedogna, Francesco and Dondi, Nicola. SymTh for non-finite symmetries. 2024. arXiv:2402.14813

work page arXiv 2024
[51]

Cornering relative symmetry theories

Cveti. Cornering relative symmetry theories. Phys. Rev. D. 2025. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.085026. arXiv:2408.12600

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.085026 2025
[52]

Heckman, Jonathan J. and H. Celestial Topology, Symmetry Theories, and Evidence for a NonSUSY D3-Brane CFT. Fortsch. Phys. 2025. doi:10.1002/prop.202400270. arXiv:2406.08485

work page doi:10.1002/prop.202400270 2025
[53]

Heckman, Jonathan J. and H. Symmetry Theories, Wigner's Function, Compactification, and Holography. 2025. arXiv:2505.23887

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models

Apruzzi, Fabio and Bedogna, Francesco and Mancani, Salvo. SymTFT construction of gapless exotic-foliated dual models. 2025. arXiv:2504.11449

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[55]

Non-Abelian string and particle braiding in topological order: Modular SL(3, Z ) representation and (3+1) -dimensional twisted gauge theory

Wang, Juven and Wen, Xiao-Gang. Non-Abelian string and particle braiding in topological order: Modular SL(3, Z ) representation and (3+1) -dimensional twisted gauge theory. Phys. Rev. B. 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.035134. arXiv:1404.7854

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.035134 2015
[56]

Yu, Noninvertible symmetries in 2D from type IIB string theory, Phys

Yu, Xingyang. Non-invertible Symmetries in 2D from Type IIB String Theory. 2023. arXiv:2310.15339

work page arXiv 2023
[57]

and Szabo, Richard J

Bergeron, Mario and Semenoff, Gordon W. and Szabo, Richard J. Canonical bf type topological field theory and fractional statistics of strings. Nucl. Phys. B. 1995. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00503-7. arXiv:hep-th/9407020

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(94)00503-7 1995
[58]

and Park, Daniel S

Del Zotto, Michele and Heckman, Jonathan J. and Park, Daniel S. and Rudelius, Tom. On the Defect Group of a 6D SCFT. Lett. Math. Phys. 2016. doi:10.1007/s11005-016-0839-5. arXiv:1503.04806

work page doi:10.1007/s11005-016-0839-5 2016
[59]

Brane brick models for the Sasaki-Einstein 7-manifolds Y ^ p,k ( C P ^ 1 C P ^ 1 ) and Y ^ p,k ( C P ^ 2 )

Franco, Sebastian and Ghim, Dongwook and Seong, Rak-Kyeong. Brane brick models for the Sasaki-Einstein 7-manifolds Y ^ p,k ( C P ^ 1 C P ^ 1 ) and Y ^ p,k ( C P ^ 2 ). JHEP. 2023. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2023)050. arXiv:2212.02523

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2023)050 2023
[60]

2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories and D-Branes

Franco, Sebastian and Ghim, Dongwook and Lee, Sangmin and Seong, Rak-Kyeong and Yokoyama, Daisuke. 2d (0,2) Quiver Gauge Theories and D-Branes. JHEP. 2015. doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2015)072. arXiv:1506.03818

work page doi:10.1007/jhep09(2015)072 2015
[61]

Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0,2) Quivers

Franco, Sebastian and Lee, Sangmin and Seong, Rak-Kyeong. Brane Brick Models, Toric Calabi-Yau 4-Folds and 2d (0,2) Quivers. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2016)047. arXiv:1510.01744

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2016)047 2016
[62]

Brane brick models and 2d (0, 2) triality

Franco, Sebastian and Lee, Sangmin and Seong, Rak-Kyeong. Brane brick models and 2d (0, 2) triality. JHEP. 2016. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2016)020. arXiv:1602.01834

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2016)020 2016
[63]

Brane Brick Models in the Mirror

Franco, Sebastian and Lee, Sangmin and Seong, Rak-Kyeong and Vafa, Cumrun. Brane Brick Models in the Mirror. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2017)106. arXiv:1609.01723

work page doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)106 2017
[64]

Orbifold Reduction and 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories

Franco, Sebastian and Lee, Sangmin and Seong, Rak-Kyeong. Orbifold Reduction and 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2017)016. arXiv:1609.07144

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2017)016 2017
[65]

Elliptic Genera of 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories from Brane Brick Models

Franco, Sebastian and Ghim, Dongwook and Lee, Sangmin and Seong, Rak-Kyeong. Elliptic Genera of 2d (0,2) Gauge Theories from Brane Brick Models. JHEP. 2017. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2017)068. arXiv:1702.02948

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2017)068 2017
[66]

On the Classification of Duality Webs for Graded Quivers

Franco, Sebasti\'an and Hasan, Azeem and Yu, Xingyang. On the Classification of Duality Webs for Graded Quivers. JHEP. 2020. doi:10.1007/JHEP06(2020)130. arXiv:2001.08776

work page doi:10.1007/jhep06(2020)130 2020
[67]

Graded quivers and B-branes at Calabi-Yau singularities

Closset, Cyril and Franco, Sebasti\'an and Guo, Jirui and Hasan, Azeem. Graded quivers and B-branes at Calabi-Yau singularities. JHEP. 2019. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)053. arXiv:1811.07016

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2019)053 2019
[68]

3d printing of 2d N = (0,2 ) gauge theories

Franco, Sebasti\'an and Hasan, Azeem. 3d printing of 2d N = (0,2 ) gauge theories. JHEP. 2018. doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2018)082. arXiv:1801.00799

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2018)082 2018
[69]

BFT _ 2 : a general class of 2d N = (0, 2) theories, 3-manifolds and toric geometry

Franco, Sebasti\'an and Yu, Xingyang. BFT _ 2 : a general class of 2d N = (0, 2) theories, 3-manifolds and toric geometry. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2022)277. arXiv:2107.00667

work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)277 2022
[70]

and Yu, Xingyang

Franco, Sebasti\'an and Mininno, Alessandro and Uranga, \'Angel M. and Yu, Xingyang. 2d N = (0, 1) gauge theories and Spin(7) orientifolds. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)150. arXiv:2110.03696

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)150 2022
[71]

and Yu, Xingyang

Franco, Sebasti\'an and Mininno, Alessandro and Uranga, \'Angel M. and Yu, Xingyang. Spin(7) orientifolds and 2d N = (0, 1) triality. JHEP. 2022. doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)058. arXiv:2112.03929

work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2022)058 2022
[72]

Apruzzi, Fabio and Bonetti, Federico and Gould, Dewi S. W. and Schafer-Nameki, Sakura. Aspects of Categorical Symmetries from Branes: SymTFTs and Generalized Charges. 2023. arXiv:2306.16405

work page arXiv 2023
[73]

Non-Invertible Symmetries, Brane Dynamics, and Tachyon Condensation

Bah, Ibrahima and Leung, Enoch and Waddleton, Thomas. Non-Invertible Symmetries, Brane Dynamics, and Tachyon Condensation. 2023. arXiv:2306.15783

work page arXiv 2023
[74]

Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions

Choi, Yichul and Cordova, Clay and Hsin, Po-Shen and Lam, Ho Tat and Shao, Shu-Heng. Noninvertible duality defects in 3+1 dimensions. Phys. Rev. D. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.125016. arXiv:2111.01139

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.125016 2022
[75]

What’s Done CannotBe Undone: TASILectures on Non-InvertibleSymmetries,

Shao, Shu-Heng. What's Done Cannot Be Undone: TASI Lectures on Non-Invertible Symmetry. 2023. arXiv:2308.00747

work page arXiv 2023
[76]

ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries,

Schafer-Nameki, Sakura. ICTP Lectures on (Non-)Invertible Generalized Symmetries. 2023. arXiv:2305.18296

work page arXiv 2023
[77]

Lectures on generalized symmetries,

Bhardwaj, Lakshya and Bottini, Lea E. and Fraser-Taliente, Ludovic and Gladden, Liam and Gould, Dewi S. W. and Platschorre, Arthur and Tillim, Hannah. Lectures on Generalized Symmetries. 2023. arXiv:2307.07547

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

Finite group rings , author=. Trans. Moscow Math. Soc. , volume=
[79]

Luo, Q.-R

Luo, Ran and Wang, Qing-Rui and Wang, Yi-Nan. Lecture Notes on Generalized Symmetries and Applications. 2023. arXiv:2307.09215

work page arXiv 2023
[80]

Kaidi, K

Kaidi, Justin and Ohmori, Kantaro and Zheng, Yunqin. Kramers-Wannier-like Duality Defects in (3+1)D Gauge Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.111601. arXiv:2111.01141

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.111601 2022
[81]

The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries

Antinucci, Andrea and Benini, Francesco and Copetti, Christian and Galati, Giovanni and Rizi, Giovanni. The holography of non-invertible self-duality symmetries. 2022. arXiv:2210.09146

work page arXiv 2022

Showing first 80 references.