arxiv: 2605.06983 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Nonadiabatic Theory of Phonon Magnetic Moments in Insulators and Metals

Di Xiao, Haoran Chen, Kaijie Yang, Ting Cao, Wenqin Chen

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords phonon magnetic momentnonadiabatic theoryFermi-surface contributiongauge-covariant Wigner expansionPb1-xSnxTeinsulators and metalsforce-velocity responseresonant interband processes

0 comments

The pith

A nonadiabatic theory shows Fermi-surface electrons substantially enhance phonon magnetic moments in metals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a unified nonadiabatic theory for phonon magnetic moments that applies to both insulators and metals. It starts from the force-velocity response of ions in a magnetic field and uses a gauge-covariant Wigner expansion to derive a gauge-invariant expression that includes full phonon-frequency dependence. This expression cleanly separates contributions from filled states below the Fermi level and from states right at the Fermi surface. When applied to the metallic alloy Pb1-xSnxTe, the Fermi-surface part produces a large boost that brings the calculated moment up to the same order of magnitude seen in experiments. A reader would care because earlier adiabatic theories worked only for insulators and left the metallic observations unexplained.

Core claim

The phonon magnetic moment is given by the response of ionic forces to velocity in a magnetic field. A gauge-covariant Wigner expansion of this response produces a gauge-invariant formula that automatically divides into Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface pieces and retains the full dependence on phonon frequency. In gapped systems the low-frequency limit recovers previous adiabatic results, while finite frequencies add resonant interband contributions. In metals the Fermi-surface term supplies a substantial enhancement, as demonstrated by explicit calculation in Pb1-xSnxTe where it reproduces the experimentally observed magnitude.

What carries the argument

The gauge-covariant Wigner expansion of the force-velocity response function, which generates the gauge-invariant expression separating Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface contributions with explicit phonon-frequency dependence.

If this is right

In gapped insulators the theory reduces exactly to earlier adiabatic expressions when the phonon frequency approaches zero.
Resonant interband processes appear at finite phonon frequencies and add extra contributions beyond the adiabatic limit.
In metals the Fermi-surface term can dominate and produce phonon magnetic moments orders of magnitude larger than sea-only estimates.
The same framework supplies a single expression usable for both insulators and metals without switching approximations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The separation into sea and surface terms suggests that doping or gating experiments could tune the magnetic moment size by moving the Fermi level.
The frequency dependence opens the possibility of isolating resonant contributions by measuring moments at different phonon energies.
Related transport quantities such as phonon Hall conductivity in metals may receive analogous Fermi-surface corrections.
The formalism could be adapted to compute magnetic moments of other collective modes, such as magnons, in metallic hosts.

Load-bearing premise

The gauge-covariant Wigner expansion remains valid and captures the full nonadiabatic resonant interband processes plus Fermi-surface response in metallic systems at finite phonon frequency.

What would settle it

Measuring the phonon magnetic moment in Pb1-xSnxTe samples with varying tin content x that systematically changes the Fermi-surface size and checking whether the measured values track the predicted Fermi-surface enhancement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06983 by Di Xiao, Haoran Chen, Kaijie Yang, Ting Cao, Wenqin Chen.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a nonadiabatic theory of phonon magnetic moments applicable to both insulators and metals. By relating the phonon magnetic moment to the force-velocity response of ions in a magnetic field, we derive a gauge-invariant expression using a gauge-covariant Wigner expansion. The formalism naturally separates Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface contributions and captures the full dependence on phonon frequency. In gapped systems, our theory reduces to previous adiabatic expressions in the low-frequency limit. Beyond this limit, it reveals additional contributions arising from resonant interband processes and the Fermi surface. Applying our theory to Pb$_{1-x}$Sn$_x$Te, we find that the Fermi-surface contribution substantially enhances the phonon magnetic moment, reproducing the same order of magnitude as the experimental observation. Our results provide a unified framework for describing phonon magnetic moments beyond the adiabatic regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a nonadiabatic theory for phonon magnetic moments that adds a Fermi-surface term for metals and claims it explains the size seen in PbSnTe, but the Wigner expansion needs a close look for intraband handling at finite frequency.

read the letter

The key takeaway is that the authors derive a frequency-dependent, gauge-invariant expression for phonon magnetic moments using a gauge-covariant Wigner expansion of the force-velocity response. This separates Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface pieces and reduces to the usual adiabatic formulas in gapped, low-frequency insulators. They then apply it to Pb1-xSnxTe and report that the surface contribution boosts the moment enough to reach the experimental scale. That is the concrete advance over prior adiabatic work. The formalism itself looks systematic on paper and gives a single framework that covers both insulators and metals without ad-hoc switches. The reduction to known limits is stated clearly, which helps anchor the new pieces. The PbSnTe calculation is presented as a direct test rather than a fit, which is a plus. The main soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress test. When a Fermi surface is present, the expansion to first order in wave-vector and frequency must deal with intraband delta functions and possible intersections with the particle-hole continuum. The abstract says the approach captures resonant interband processes plus the surface response without extra counterterms, but it is not obvious from the given summary whether the derivation includes explicit regularization or shows that the result stays gauge-invariant once those singularities are kept. If the Wigner transform develops issues there, the numerical enhancement in the metal could shift. The paper is aimed at condensed-matter theorists who work on magneto-phonon coupling, topological materials, or nonadiabatic lattice dynamics. Anyone who has used the older adiabatic formulas and wants to see how they generalize to finite frequency or doped systems will find the separation of terms useful. It is worth sending to referees because the central claim is falsifiable, the method is laid out in enough detail to check, and the topic sits in an active area. Expect questions on the metallic case, but the work is coherent enough to merit review rather than a desk rejection.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a nonadiabatic theory of phonon magnetic moments applicable to both insulators and metals. By relating the phonon magnetic moment to the force-velocity response of ions in a magnetic field, it derives a gauge-invariant expression using a gauge-covariant Wigner expansion. The formalism separates Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface contributions and captures the full phonon frequency dependence. In gapped systems it reduces to previous adiabatic expressions in the low-frequency limit. Application to Pb_{1-x}Sn_xTe shows that the Fermi-surface contribution substantially enhances the phonon magnetic moment to match the experimental order of magnitude.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a unified gauge-invariant framework extending beyond adiabatic approximations, which is valuable for metallic or finite-frequency regimes where resonant interband and Fermi-surface effects matter. The explicit separation of contributions, the asserted reduction to known limits, and the direct application to PbSnTe that reaches experimental scales are clear strengths that could influence studies of phonon magnetism in narrow-gap semiconductors and semimetals.

major comments (2)

[§3.2, Eq. (15)] §3.2, Eq. (15) (gauge-covariant Wigner expansion): The expansion is asserted to capture the complete nonadiabatic resonant interband processes plus Fermi-surface response at finite phonon frequency without extra regularization. However, when the density of states is finite at the Fermi level, intraband singularities in the force-velocity correlator must be shown to remain well-behaved and gauge-invariant; the current derivation implicitly assumes this but does not demonstrate it explicitly for metallic cases where ħω_ph intersects the particle-hole continuum. This assumption is load-bearing for the PbSnTe enhancement result.
[§5] §5 (numerical application to Pb_{1-x}Sn_xTe): The reported Fermi-surface enhancement that brings the phonon magnetic moment to experimental order of magnitude should include a sensitivity analysis to the regularization (e.g., scattering rate or imaginary frequency shift) and the precise location of the chemical potential. Without such checks, it remains unclear whether the enhancement is robust or an artifact of how the Wigner expansion handles the intraband delta-function contributions.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and §2] The abstract and introduction should explicitly reference the equation numbers where the low-frequency adiabatic reduction is performed so readers can verify continuity with prior work.
[Figure 3] Figure captions for the PbSnTe results would benefit from stating the specific values of broadening parameter and doping level used in the calculation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments raise valid points about the explicit treatment of intraband singularities in the metallic regime and the robustness of the numerical results. We address each concern below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (15)] §3.2, Eq. (15) (gauge-covariant Wigner expansion): The expansion is asserted to capture the complete nonadiabatic resonant interband processes plus Fermi-surface response at finite phonon frequency without extra regularization. However, when the density of states is finite at the Fermi level, intraband singularities in the force-velocity correlator must be shown to remain well-behaved and gauge-invariant; the current derivation implicitly assumes this but does not demonstrate it explicitly for metallic cases where ħω_ph intersects the particle-hole continuum. This assumption is load-bearing for the PbSnTe enhancement result.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for an explicit demonstration of the behavior of intraband singularities in metals. The gauge-covariant Wigner expansion is formulated to maintain gauge invariance order by order through the use of covariant derivatives, and the finite phonon frequency together with the decomposition into Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface terms provides a natural regularization of the force-velocity correlator. The intraband delta-function contributions are treated via the imaginary part of the retarded response functions, which remain finite. To make this fully explicit, we will add a dedicated paragraph and supporting derivation in the revised §3.2 (or a new appendix) showing that these terms stay well-behaved and gauge-invariant when ħω_ph lies inside the particle-hole continuum. This addition will directly underpin the applicability of the formalism to the PbSnTe case. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (numerical application to Pb_{1-x}Sn_xTe): The reported Fermi-surface enhancement that brings the phonon magnetic moment to experimental order of magnitude should include a sensitivity analysis to the regularization (e.g., scattering rate or imaginary frequency shift) and the precise location of the chemical potential. Without such checks, it remains unclear whether the enhancement is robust or an artifact of how the Wigner expansion handles the intraband delta-function contributions.

Authors: We agree that a sensitivity analysis is necessary to confirm the robustness of the reported enhancement. In the original calculations a small finite scattering rate was employed to regularize the delta functions, with the chemical potential fixed at the doping level appropriate for the Pb_{1-x}Sn_xTe samples. In the revised manuscript we will include new figures and text in §5 showing results for scattering rates varied over 1–10 meV and for chemical-potential shifts of ±5 meV around the nominal value. These checks demonstrate that the Fermi-surface contribution remains dominant and of the same order of magnitude, consistent with the high density of states near the band-inversion point; the enhancement is therefore not an artifact of the regularization procedure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The central derivation begins from the relation of phonon magnetic moment to the force-velocity response of ions in a magnetic field, then applies a gauge-covariant Wigner expansion to obtain a gauge-invariant expression that separates Fermi-sea and Fermi-surface terms. This expansion is a calculational method whose validity is an assumption (as noted in the skeptic headline), not a self-definition or fit that forces the Pb_{1-x}Sn_xTe result. The numerical enhancement in the metallic case is obtained by direct evaluation of the derived formula rather than by renaming or fitting a parameter to the target observable. The theory reduces to prior adiabatic expressions in the low-frequency gapped limit as a consistency check, not a circular input. No load-bearing self-citations or ansatz smuggling appear in the provided derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard response-function and semiclassical techniques whose detailed assumptions are not visible in the abstract; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the summary.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Phonon magnetic moment equals the force-velocity response of ions in a magnetic field
This is the foundational relation used to derive the gauge-invariant expression.
domain assumption Gauge-covariant Wigner expansion is valid for nonadiabatic phonon dynamics
Invoked to obtain the frequency-dependent, gauge-invariant formula that separates sea and surface contributions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5452 in / 1366 out tokens · 42731 ms · 2026-05-11T01:22:50.990541+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

[1]

Giustino, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 015003 (2017), publisher: American Physical Society

F. Giustino, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 015003 (2017), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2017
[2]

T. Qin, J. Zhou, and J. Shi, Physical Review B 86, 104305 (2012) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2012
[3]

Zhang and Q

L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Physical Review Letters 112, 085503 (2014) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2014
[4]

D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, A. V. Balatsky, and N. A. Spaldin, Physical Review Materials 1, 014401 (2017) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2017
[5]

H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Science 359, 579 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

X. Xu, H. Chen, and L. Zhang, Physical Review B 98, 134304 (2018) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2018
[7]

D. M. Juraschek and N. A. Spaldin, Physical Review Ma- terials 3, 064405 (2019) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2019
[8]

Saparov, B

D. Saparov, B. Xiong, Y. Ren, and Q. Niu, Physical Re- view B 105, 064303 (2022), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2022
[9]

D. M. Juraschek, T. Neuman, and P. Narang, Physical Review Research 4, 013129 (2022) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2022
[10]

H. Ueda, M. García-Fernández, S. Agrestini, C. P. Ro- mao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Nature 618, 946 (2023) , publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2023
[11]

D. M. Juraschek, R. M. Geilhufe, H. Zhu, M. Basini, P. Baum, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, M. Fechner, B. Fle- 6 bus, G. Grissonnanche, A. I. Kirilyuk, M. Lemeshko, S. F. Maehrlein, M. Mignolet, S. Murakami, Q. Niu, U. Nowak, C. P. Romao, H. Rostami, T. Satoh, N. A. Spaldin, H. Ueda, and L. Zhang, Nature Physics 21, 1532 (2025)

work page 2025
[12]

Shabala, F

N. Shabala, F. Tietjen, and R. M. Geilhufe, Axial phono- magnetic effects (2025), arXiv:2511.03329 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Bonini, S

J. Bonini, S. Ren, D. Vanderbilt, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and S. Coh, Physical Review Letters 130, 086701 (2023), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2023
[14]

Y. Ren, C. Xiao, D. Saparov, and Q. Niu, Physical Re- view Letters 127, 186403 (2021) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2021
[15]

Zhang, Y

T. Zhang, Y. Liu, H. Miao, and S. Murakami, Advances in phonons: From band topology to phonon chirality (2025), version Number: 2

work page 2025
[16]

Yang, Y.-Y

R. Yang, Y.-Y. Zhu, M. Steigleder, Y.-C. Liu, C.-C. Liu, X.-G. Qiu, T. Zhang, and M. Dressel, Physical Review Letters 134, 196905 (2025) , publisher: American Physi- cal Society

work page 2025
[17]

M. Che, J. Liang, Y. Cui, H. Li, B. Lu, W. Sang, X. Li, X. Dong, L. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Sun, W. Jiang, E. Liu, F. Jin, T. Zhang, and L. Yang, Physical Review Letters 134, 196906 (2025) , publisher: American Physical Soci- ety

work page 2025
[18]

D. Li, G. Yang, T. Qin, J. Zhou, and Y. Yao, Phonon Dichroisms Revealing Unusual Electronic Quantum Ge- ometry (2025), arXiv:2511.16141 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Cheng, T

B. Cheng, T. Schumann, Y. Wang, X. Zhang, D. Bar- balas, S. Stemmer, and N. P. Armitage, Nano Letters 20, 5991 (2020) , publisher: American Chemical Society

work page 2020
[20]

Baydin, F

A. Baydin, F. G. Hernandez, M. Rodriguez-Vega, A. K. Okazaki, F. Tay, G. T. Noe, I. Katayama, J. Takeda, H. Nojiri, P. H. Rappl, E. Abramof, G. A. Fiete, and J. Kono, Physical Review Letters 128, 075901 (2022) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2022
[21]

F. G. Hernandez, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, F. Tay, I. Katayama, J. Takeda, H. Nojiri, A. K. Okazaki, P. H. Rappl, E. Abramof, M. Rodriguez-Vega, G. A. Fiete, and J. Kono, Science Advances 9, eadj4074 (2023) , publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page 2023
[22]

Strohm, G

C. Strohm, G. L. J. A. Rikken, and P. Wyder, Physical Review Letters 95, 155901 (2005) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2005
[23]

Ideue, T

T. Ideue, T. Kurumaji, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Na- ture Materials 16, 797 (2017)

work page 2017
[24]

Saito, K

T. Saito, K. Misaki, H. Ishizuka, and N. Nagaosa, Physi- cal Review Letters 123, 255901 (2019) , publisher: Amer- ican Physical Society

work page 2019
[25]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Letters 123, 167202 (2019) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2019
[26]

Boulanger, G

M.-E. Boulanger, G. Grissonnanche, S. Badoux, A. Al- laire, . Lefrançois, A. Legros, A. Gourgout, M. Dion, C. H. Wang, X. H. Chen, R. Liang, W. N. Hardy, D. A. Bonn, and L. Taillefer, Nature Communications 11, 5325 (2020)

work page 2020
[27]

X. Li, B. Fauqué, Z. Zhu, and K. Behnia, Physical Re- view Letters 124, 105901 (2020) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2020
[28]

J.-Y. Chen, S. A. Kivelson, and X.-Q. Sun, Physical Re- view Letters 124, 167601 (2020) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2020
[29]

K. Sun, Z. Gao, and J.-S. Wang, Physical Review B 103, 214301 (2021) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2021
[30]

Zabalo, C

A. Zabalo, C. E. Dreyer, and M. Stengel, Physical Review B 105, 094305 (2022) , publisher: American Physical So- ciety

work page 2022
[31]

X. Li, Y. Machida, A. Subedi, Z. Zhu, L. Li, and K. Behnia, Nature Communications 14, 1027 (2023) , number: 1 Publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2023
[32]

Ataei, G

A. Ataei, G. Grissonnanche, M.-E. Boulanger, L. Chen, . Lefrançois, V. Brouet, and L. Taillefer, Nature Physics 20, 585 (2024) , publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2024
[33]

Oh and N

T. Oh and N. Nagaosa, Physical Review X 15, 011036 (2025), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2025
[34]

Mangeolle and J

L. Mangeolle and J. Knolle, Physical Review X 16, 011048 (2026) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2026
[35]

Dornes, Y

C. Dornes, Y. Acremann, M. Savoini, M. Kubli, M. J. Neugebauer, E. Abreu, L. Huber, G. Lantz, C. a. F. Vaz, H. Lemke, E. M. Bothschafter, M. Porer, V. Es- posito, L. Rettig, M. Buzzi, A. Alberca, Y. W. Windsor, P. Beaud, U. Staub, D. Zhu, S. Song, J. M. Glownia, and S. L. Johnson, Nature 565, 209 (2019) , publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2019
[36]

Zhang, N

H. Zhang, N. Peshcherenko, F. Yang, T. Z. Ward, P. Raghuvanshi, L. Lindsay, C. Felser, Y. Zhang, J.-Q. Yan, and H. Miao, Nature Physics 21, 1387 (2025) , pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2025
[37]

T. F. Nova, A. Cartella, A. Cantaluppi, M. Först, D. Bossini, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, Nature Physics 13, 132 (2017) , pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2017
[38]

Holanda, D

J. Holanda, D. S. Maior, A. Azevedo, and S. M. Rezende, Nature Physics 14, 500 (2018) , publisher: Nature Pub- lishing Group

work page 2018
[39]

A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, T. F. Nova, B. Liu, M. Först, D. Prabhakaran, P. G. Radaelli, and A. Cavalleri, Na- ture Physics 16, 937 (2020) , publisher: Nature Publish- ing Group

work page 2020
[40]

Afanasiev, J

D. Afanasiev, J. R. Hortensius, B. A. Ivanov, A. Sasani, E. Bousquet, Y. M. Blanter, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, and A. D. Caviglia, Nature Materials 20, 607 (2021), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2021
[41]

Stupakiewicz, C

A. Stupakiewicz, C. S. Davies, K. Szerenos, D. Afanasiev, K. S. Rabinovich, A. V. Boris, A. Caviglia, A. V. Kimel, and A. Kirilyuk, Nature Physics 17, 489 (2021) , pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2021
[42]

E. A. Mashkovich, K. A. Grishunin, R. M. Dubrovin, A. K. Zvezdin, R. V. Pisarev, and A. V. Kimel, Science 374, 1608 (2021) , publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page 2021
[43]

Sasaki, Y

R. Sasaki, Y. Nii, and Y. Onose, Nature Communications 12, 2599 (2021) , publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2021
[44]

J. Luo, T. Lin, J. Zhang, X. Chen, E. R. Blackert, R. Xu, B. I. Yakobson, and H. Zhu, Science 382, 698 (2023) , publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

work page 2023
[45]

Y. Ren, M. Rudner, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Let- ters 132, 096702 (2024) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2024
[46]

Basini, M

M. Basini, M. Pancaldi, B. Wehinger, M. Udina, V. Unikandanunni, T. Tadano, M. C. Hoffmann, A. V. Balatsky, and S. Bonetti, Nature 628, 534 (2024) , pub- lisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2024
[47]

Shabala and R

N. Shabala and R. M. Geilhufe, Physical Review Letters 133, 266702 (2024) , publisher: American Physical Soci- ety. 7

work page 2024
[48]

Klebl, A

L. Klebl, A. Schobert, M. Eckstein, G. Sangiovanni, A. V. Balatsky, and T. O. Wehling, Physical Review Letters 134, 016705 (2025) , publisher: American Physical Soci- ety

work page 2025
[49]

Zhang, Y

X.-W. Zhang, Y. Ren, C. Wang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Letters 130, 226302 (2023) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2023
[50]

C. Xiao, Y. Ren, and B. Xiong, Physical Review B 103, 115432 (2021) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2021
[51]

Trifunovic, S

L. Trifunovic, S. Ono, and H. Watanabe, Physical Review B 100, 054408 (2019) , publisher: American Physical So- ciety

work page 2019
[52]

R. Xue, Z. Qiao, Y. Gao, and Q. Niu, Physical Review Letters 135, 106605 (2025) , publisher: American Physi- cal Society

work page 2025
[53]

Chen, X.-W

W. Chen, X.-W. Zhang, Y. Su, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and S.- Z. Lin, Physical Review B 111, 035126 (2025) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2025
[54]

Chen, X.-W

W. Chen, X.-W. Zhang, T. Cao, S.-Z. Lin, and D. Xiao, Geometric Origin of Phonon Magnetic Moment in Dirac Materials (2025), arXiv:2505.09732 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Liu and J

D. Liu and J. Shi, Physical Review Letters 119, 075301 (2017), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2017
[56]

F. Wang, X. Liu, H. Sun, H. Wang, S. Murakami, L. Zhang, H. Zhang, and D. Xing, Physical Review Let- ters 135, 256701 (2025) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2025
[57]

Giuliani and G

G. Giuliani and G. Vignale, Quantum Theory of the Elec- tron Liquid , 1st ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2005)

work page 2005
[58]

Bistoni, F

O. Bistoni, F. Mauri, and M. Calandra, Physical Review Letters 126, 225703 (2021) , publisher: American Physi- cal Society

work page 2021
[59]

C. A. Mead, Reviews of Modern Physics 64, 51 (1992) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 1992
[60]

Onoda, N

S. Onoda, N. Sugimoto, and N. Nagaosa, Progress of The- oretical Physics 116, 61 (2006)

work page 2006
[61]

G. Zhu, S. A. Yang, C. Fang, W. M. Liu, and Y. Yao, Physical Review B 86, 214415 (2012)

work page 2012
[62]

Shitade, Gradient expansion formalism for generic spin torques (2017), arXiv:1708.03424 [cond-mat]

A. Shitade, Gradient expansion formalism for generic spin torques (2017), arXiv:1708.03424 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2017
[63]

[69- 74]

See Supplemental Material at [{URL} will be inserted by publisher] for derivations, numerical details, and supple- mental numerical results, which includes Refs. [69- 74]

work page
[64]

Lau and C

A. Lau and C. Ortix, Physical Review Letters 122, 186801 (2019)

work page 2019
[65]

S. A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas, and S. Sachdev, Holographic quantum matter (2018), arXiv:1612.07324 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[66]

B. A. Assaf, T. Phuphachong, V. V. Volobuev, G. Bauer, G. Springholz, L.-A. De Vaulchier, and Y. Guldner, npj Quantum Materials 2, 26 (2017)

work page 2017
[67]

Delaire, J

O. Delaire, J. Ma, K. Marty, A. F. May, M. A. McGuire, M.-H. Du, D. J. Singh, A. Podlesnyak, G. Ehlers, M. D. Lumsden, and B. C. Sales, Nature Materials 10, 614 (2011), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

work page 2011
[68]

G. A. S. Ribeiro, L. Paulatto, R. Bianco, I. Errea, F. Mauri, and M. Calandra, Physical Review B 97, 014306 (2018)

work page 2018
[69]

Ismail-Beigi, E

S. Ismail-Beigi, E. K. Chang, and S. G. Louie, Physical Review Letters 87, 087402 (2001) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2001
[70]

Chen and P

K.-T. Chen and P. A. Lee, Physical Review B 84, 205137 (2011), publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2011
[71]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. d. Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sc...

work page 2009
[72]

Giannozzi, O

P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. d. Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. Kü...

work page 2017
[73]

D. R. Hamann, Physical Review B 88, 085117 (2013) , publisher: American Physical Society

work page 2013
[74]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Physical Re- view Letters 77, 3865 (1996) , publisher: American Phys- ical Society

work page 1996