pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06985 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-th · quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Real-Time Quantum Dynamics on the Fuzzy Sphere: Chaos and Entanglement

B. \"Ozcan, S. K\"urkc\"uo\u{g}lu

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th quant-ph
keywords fuzzy spherematrix modelquantum chaosLyapunov exponententanglement entropyreal-time dynamicsMaldacena-Shenker-Stanford boundGaussian states
0
0 comments X

The pith

The bosonic matrix model on the fuzzy sphere respects the Maldacena-Shenker-Stanford chaos bound at all temperatures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the real-time evolution of a two-matrix bosonic model whose geometry is that of the fuzzy sphere. Using the Gaussian state approximation, the authors close the equations of motion for the one- and two-point functions and evolve them from near-thermal initial states. They extract the largest Lyapunov exponent from the growth of out-of-time-order correlators and find that it falls to zero at a finite temperature while the system continues to exhibit rapid linear growth of entanglement entropy for a range of bipartitions. A reader would care because the result supplies an explicit, controlled example in which quantum effects tame classical chaos in a manner consistent with general bounds on quantum information spreading.

Core claim

Starting from the Hamiltonian of two bosonic fields on the fuzzy sphere, the Gaussian-state equations of motion are solved for thermal and near-thermal initial conditions. The largest Lyapunov exponent extracted from the real-time correlators tends to zero at a finite temperature, thereby respecting the Maldacena-Shenker-Stanford bound at every temperature, while the same exponent approaches its classical chaotic value at high temperature. Simultaneously, the entanglement entropy computed for successive bipartitions grows linearly, demonstrating fast scrambling.

What carries the argument

The closed nonlinear system of differential equations for the one- and two-point correlation functions obtained via Wick contraction within the Gaussian-state ansatz; this system directly yields the time-dependent out-of-time-order correlators from which the Lyapunov exponent is read off.

If this is right

  • The model never violates the Maldacena-Shenker-Stanford bound on the rate of chaos.
  • At sufficiently high temperature the dynamics recover the classically chaotic regime.
  • Entanglement entropy grows linearly with time for multiple spatial bipartitions, indicating fast scrambling.
  • The thermal state is completely fixed by maximizing the von Neumann entropy subject to the Gaussian constraint.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar finite-temperature suppression of the Lyapunov exponent may appear in other matrix models or fuzzy-geometry systems once the Gaussian approximation is relaxed.
  • Adding fermions or increasing the matrix size N would provide a direct test of whether the zero-temperature bound continues to hold.
  • The same real-time equations could be used to compute additional diagnostics such as the spectral form factor or higher-point OTOCs to cross-check the scrambling picture.

Load-bearing premise

The Gaussian state approximation remains accurate throughout the real-time evolution and the chosen initial states are sufficiently close to thermal equilibrium to extract a meaningful Lyapunov exponent.

What would settle it

A full quantum simulation or exact diagonalization of the same matrix model at intermediate temperatures that finds a positive Lyapunov exponent persisting all the way to zero temperature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06985 by B. \"Ozcan, S. K\"urkc\"uo\u{g}lu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Planar and Non-Planar Contractions Planar Interaction: We first consider the model with the planar interaction potential λ 2 T r(Xˆ 1Xˆ 1Xˆ 2Xˆ 2 ) as it is analytically more transparent and paves the way for the treatment of the model with the non-planar term included as we will see later on. We observe that this model breaks the O(2) 12 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: E/N2 and Total Coordinate dispersion, 1 N ⟨T r Xˆ iXˆ i ⟩, versus T for N = 5, µ = 1 10 , R = 5, λ = 1 5 . 17 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plots are given for for N = 5, µ = 1 10 , R = 5, λ = 1 5 and Ndof = 2N 2 = 50. 2.5. Choosing the initial conditions We have already noted that the thermal equilibrium conditions yield a static solution for the equations of motion (2.13)-(2.15), (B.2)-(B.9). Linearization of the latter around this solution leads to small fluctuations as one can recognize both analytically and numerically. Thus, as may be na… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of ⟨T r(XX)⟩ /N with time (in units of classical Lyapunov time τL = λ −1 L ) plottted at N = 5, R = 5, µ = 1/10, λ = 1/5. 22 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: λL time series at N = 5, R = 5, µ = 1/10, λ = 1/5. 23 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: λL as a function of temperature T at N = 5, R = 5, µ = 1/10, λ = 1/5. Figure (7a) Planar Interaction. Figure (7b) Full Interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: λL as a function of temperature T at N = 4, N = 5 comparison. R = 5, µ = 1/10. 24 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: N = 5, R = 5, µ = 1/10, λ = 1/5. On the right λL versus the radius R of S 2 F at N = 5, T = 5, µ = 1/10, λ = 1/5. models, that is models with with only quadratic potentials real time techniques are applied to compute the entanglement entropy in [37, 43–46]. The method we are going to outline and use below relies on the use and evaluation of the reduced covariance matrix and is therefore distinct and readil… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: S/Ndof as a function of time. 28 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: λL and λE (Averaged over all avaiable H≤L subsytems) as a function of temperature. 5 Conclusions and Outlook In this work, we have applied the Gaussian state approximation (GSA) to investigate the real-time quantum dynamics of a bosonic two-matrix model on the fuzzy sphere S 2 F × R. By truncating the Heisenberg equations of motion via Wick’s theorem, we derived a closed system of nonlinear coupled ordina… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Lyapunov Exponent Computation ti = i ∆t , i = 0, 1, . . . , n, (C.4) and at each step we measure the separation ∥δξ(ti )∥ = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p046_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the real time quantum dynamics of a matrix model consisting two bosonic fields on the fuzzy sphere using the Gaussian state approximation. Starting from the Hamiltonian formulation and using Wick's theorem, we derive a closed set of coupled nonlinear differential equations governing the time evolution of the one- and two-point correlation functions. Thermal equation of state is found by maximizing the von Neumann entropy over Gaussian states and solving algebraic self-consistency equation(s) leading to a complete determination of the symplectic spectrum of the covariance matrix. We identify near thermal initial conditions and use them to solve the equations of motion and employ our findings to probe chaos by calculating the largest Lyapunov exponent at various temperatures. Our results demonstrate that the latter tends to zero at a finite temperature indicating that the quantum dynamics respect the Maldacena,Shenker,Stanford bound across all temperatures, while approaching toward the classically chaotic regime at high temperatures. Finally, we examine the entanglement dynamics of the model in real-time by considering a sequence of bipartitions of the Hilbert space and computing the entanglement entropy and clearly exhibit the fast scrambling features that emerge in due detail.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies real-time quantum dynamics of a two-bosonic-field matrix model on the fuzzy sphere within the Gaussian state approximation. Starting from the Hamiltonian, Wick's theorem is used to close the Heisenberg equations into a set of nonlinear ODEs for one- and two-point functions. Thermal states are obtained by maximizing von Neumann entropy subject to algebraic self-consistency conditions on the covariance matrix, fully determining its symplectic spectrum. Near-thermal Gaussian initial conditions are evolved to extract the largest Lyapunov exponent, which is reported to vanish at finite temperature (respecting the MSS bound) while approaching the classical value at high T. Entanglement entropy is computed for a sequence of bipartitions and shown to exhibit fast scrambling.

Significance. If the Gaussian truncation remains accurate, the work supplies a concrete finite-dimensional example in which the MSS bound is respected at all temperatures with a controlled high-T crossover to classical chaos, together with explicit real-time entanglement growth. Such results could benchmark holographic models and studies of scrambling in matrix quantum mechanics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Derivation of the closed ODEs and real-time evolution] The closure of the equations of motion via Wick's theorem assumes the state remains Gaussian throughout the evolution. In a chaotic system, non-Gaussian cumulants can be generated and back-react on the two-point sector, potentially altering the extracted Lyapunov exponent. No diagnostic (time-dependent fourth cumulants, deviation from Wick factorization, or comparison to a truncated BBGKY hierarchy) is supplied to verify that the Gaussian ansatz survives up to the Lyapunov time at the temperatures where λ_L is reported to vanish.
  2. [Numerical extraction of the Lyapunov exponent] The central claim that λ_L tends to zero at finite temperature rests on numerical integration of the ODEs, yet the manuscript reports neither error bars, convergence tests with respect to integrator step size or cutoff, nor validation against exact results for small matrix sizes. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported vanishing is robust or an artifact of the truncation and discretization.
  3. [Thermal state and initial conditions] The thermal covariance matrix is fixed by entropy maximization subject to the same self-consistency equations that define the Gaussian state. It is therefore unclear whether the subsequent real-time Lyapunov computation is independent of this fitting procedure or whether the initial conditions are already constrained in a manner that suppresses exponential growth by construction.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the symplectic spectrum is 'completely determined' but does not specify the matrix size N or the fuzzy-sphere cutoff used in the numerics; these parameters should be stated explicitly when reporting temperature dependence.
  2. [Entanglement dynamics] The sequence of bipartitions used for the entanglement-entropy calculation is not described in detail (e.g., equal-size vs. unequal-size cuts, or how the fuzzy-sphere geometry enters the partitioning). A short clarification would strengthen the fast-scrambling claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions we will make to improve the presentation and robustness of our results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The closure of the equations of motion via Wick's theorem assumes the state remains Gaussian throughout the evolution. In a chaotic system, non-Gaussian cumulants can be generated and back-react on the two-point sector, potentially altering the extracted Lyapunov exponent. No diagnostic (time-dependent fourth cumulants, deviation from Wick factorization, or comparison to a truncated BBGKY hierarchy) is supplied to verify that the Gaussian ansatz survives up to the Lyapunov time at the temperatures where λ_L is reported to vanish.

    Authors: We acknowledge the validity of this concern. The Gaussian state approximation is a truncation that closes the hierarchy at the two-point level using Wick's theorem, and it is indeed possible for higher cumulants to develop in chaotic dynamics. In the current work, this approximation is adopted to obtain a closed, solvable system of ODEs that captures the real-time quantum dynamics and allows computation of the Lyapunov exponent and entanglement entropy. We will revise the manuscript to include an expanded discussion of the limitations of the Gaussian ansatz, including references to its successful application in related models of quantum chaos and matrix quantum mechanics. Additionally, we will report on the time evolution of the deviation from Wick factorization for a representative case to provide a basic diagnostic of the approximation's consistency up to the Lyapunov time. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The central claim that λ_L tends to zero at finite temperature rests on numerical integration of the ODEs, yet the manuscript reports neither error bars, convergence tests with respect to integrator step size or cutoff, nor validation against exact results for small matrix sizes. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the reported vanishing is robust or an artifact of the truncation and discretization.

    Authors: We agree that additional numerical validation is necessary to support the robustness of the results. In the revised manuscript, we will include error estimates on the Lyapunov exponent obtained from ensembles of initial perturbations, convergence tests varying the integrator step size and simulation cutoff time, and a discussion of numerical stability. For validation against exact results, we note that for the fuzzy sphere matrix sizes used (N ≥ 4 or higher, leading to large Hilbert spaces), exact diagonalization is not feasible due to exponential scaling. We will add this clarification and, where possible, compare to smaller toy models or classical limits. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The thermal covariance matrix is fixed by entropy maximization subject to the same self-consistency equations that define the Gaussian state. It is therefore unclear whether the subsequent real-time Lyapunov computation is independent of this fitting procedure or whether the initial conditions are already constrained in a manner that suppresses exponential growth by construction.

    Authors: The entropy maximization procedure determines the equilibrium thermal covariance matrix, which serves as a fixed point of the equations of motion. However, the Lyapunov exponent is extracted by evolving the system from initial conditions that are small perturbations of this thermal covariance (e.g., by adding a small random or structured deviation to the two-point functions while maintaining the Gaussian property). The time evolution is then governed by the full set of nonlinear ODEs derived from the Hamiltonian, independent of the entropy maximization step. The growth (or lack thereof) of the perturbation is a dynamical property of the equations. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly describe the construction of these near-thermal initial conditions and demonstrate that the procedure does not artificially suppress growth. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct numerical validation against exact quantum dynamics for the matrix sizes employed in the fuzzy sphere model, as exact diagonalization is computationally intractable for these dimensions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained under stated approximation

full rationale

The paper derives a closed set of nonlinear ODEs for one- and two-point functions by applying Wick's theorem to the Heisenberg equations under the Gaussian state ansatz. Thermal states are obtained by entropy maximization subject to algebraic self-consistency conditions on the covariance matrix, yielding initial conditions for the ODEs. The largest Lyapunov exponent is then extracted from the time-dependent solutions of those ODEs at various temperatures. This extraction is not equivalent to the thermal fit parameters by construction; the nonlinear evolution can in principle produce growth rates independent of the static self-consistency solution. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or renamings of known results are present. The Gaussian closure is an explicit approximation whose validity is assumed rather than derived from the target observable, but the reported temperature dependence of λ_L is not forced by re-labeling of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the Gaussian closure and the existence of near-thermal initial conditions; no free parameters are explicitly named in the abstract, but the self-consistency equations for the thermal covariance matrix implicitly introduce fitted quantities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The Gaussian state approximation yields a closed set of equations for the one- and two-point functions via Wick's theorem.
    Invoked to obtain the coupled nonlinear differential equations governing time evolution.
  • domain assumption Maximizing the von Neumann entropy over Gaussian states produces the correct thermal equation of state.
    Used to determine the symplectic spectrum of the covariance matrix before dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5496 in / 1389 out tokens · 48606 ms · 2026-05-11T01:12:01.591351+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Fast Scramblers

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, “Fast Scramblers,” JHEP10, 065 (2008) [arXiv:0808.2096 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  2. [2]

    Evidence for fast thermalization in the plane-wave matrix model,

    C. Asplund, D. Berenstein and D. Trancanelli, “Evidence for fast thermalization in the plane-wave matrix model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 171602 (2011) [arXiv:1104.5469 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2011

  3. [3]

    Black holes and the butterfly effect

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Black holes and the butterfly effect,” JHEP03, 067 (2014) [arXiv:1306.0622 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    Chaos in Classical D0-Brane Mechanics,

    G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada and S. H. Shenker, “Chaos in Classical D0-Brane Mechanics,” JHEP02, 091 (2016) [arXiv:1512.00019 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Smallest matrix black hole model in the classical limit,

    D. Berenstein and D. Kawai, “Smallest matrix black hole model in the classical limit,” Phys. Rev. D95, no.10, 106004 (2017) [arXiv:1608.08972 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    A bound on chaos

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “A bound on chaos,” JHEP08, 106 (2016) [arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    Comments on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.10, 106002 (2016) [arXiv:1604.07818 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Quantum Black Hole Formation in the BFSS Matrix Model,

    S. Aoki, M. Hanada and N. Iizuka, “Quantum Black Hole Formation in the BFSS Matrix Model,” JHEP07, 029 (2015) [arXiv:1503.05562 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  9. [9]

    Chaos in the BMN matrix model,

    Y. Asano, D. Kawai and K. Yoshida, “Chaos in the BMN matrix model,” JHEP06, 191 (2015) [arXiv:1503.04594 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2015

  10. [10]

    Precision lattice test of the gauge/gravity duality at large-N,

    E. Berkowitz, E. Rinaldi, M. Hanada, G. Ishiki, S. Shimasaki and P. Vranas, “Precision lattice test of the gauge/gravity duality at large-N,” Phys. Rev. D94, no.9, 094501 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.094501 [arXiv:1606.04951 [hep-lat]]. 32

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.094501 2016

  11. [11]

    Berkowitz, M

    E. Berkowitz, M. Hanada and J. Maltz, Phys. Rev. D94, no.12, 126009 (2016) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.126009 [arXiv:1602.01473 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.126009 2016

  12. [12]

    Entanglement entropy converges to classical entropy around periodic orbits,

    C. T. Asplund and D. Berenstein, “Entanglement entropy converges to classical entropy around periodic orbits,” Annals Phys.366, 113-132 (2016) [arXiv:1503.04857 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Real-time dynamics of matrix quantum mechanics beyond the classical approximation,

    P. Buividovich, M. Hanada and A. Schäfer, “Real-time dynamics of matrix quantum mechanics beyond the classical approximation,” EPJ Web Conf.175, 08006 (2018) [arXiv:1711.05556 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2018

  14. [14]

    Quantum chaos, thermalization, and entanglement generation in real-time simulations of the Banks-Fischler-Shenker-Susskind matrix model,

    P. V. Buividovich, M. Hanada and A. Schäfer, “Quantum chaos, thermalization, and entanglement generation in real-time simulations of the Banks-Fischler-Shenker-Susskind matrix model,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.4, 046011 (2019) [arXiv:1810.03378 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Chaos from equivariant fields on fuzzy S4,

    Ü. H. Co¸ skun, S. Kürkçüo˘glu, G. C. Toga and G. Ünal, “Chaos from equivariant fields on fuzzy S4,” JHEP12, 015 (2018) [arXiv:1806.10524 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Chaos from Massive Deformations of Yang-Mills Matrix Models,

    K. Ba¸ skan, S. Kürkçüo˘glu, O. Oktay and C. Ta¸ scı, “Chaos from Massive Deformations of Yang-Mills Matrix Models,” JHEP10, 003 (2020) [arXiv:1912.00932 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Chaotic dynamics of the mass deformed ABJM model,

    K. Ba¸ skan, S. Kürkçüo˘glu and C. Ta¸ scı, “Chaotic dynamics of the mass deformed ABJM model,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.6, 066006 (2023) [arXiv:2203.08240 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Sachdev,Holographic Metals and the Fractionalized Fermi Liquid,Physical Review Letters105(2010) 151602 [1006.3794]

    S. Sachdev, “Holographic metals and the fractionalized Fermi liquid,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 151602 (2010) [arXiv:1006.3794 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2010

  19. [19]

    M Theory As A Matrix Model: A Conjecture

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker and L. Susskind, “M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,” Phys. Rev. D55, 5112-5128 (1997) [arXiv:hep-th/9610043 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  20. [20]

    Chaos in the SU(2) Yang-Mills Chern-Simons matrix model,

    K. Ba¸ skan and S. Kürkçüo˘glu, “Chaos in the SU(2) Yang-Mills Chern-Simons matrix model,” Phys. Rev. D104, no.6, 066006 (2021) [arXiv:2101.05649 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Phase structure of matrix quantum mechan- ics at finite temperature,

    N. Kawahara, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, “Phase structure of matrix quantum mechanics at finite temperature,” JHEP10, 097 (2007) [arXiv:0706.3517 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Geometry in transition: A model of emergent geometry

    R. Delgadillo-Blando, D. O’Connor and B. Ydri, “Geometry in Transition: A Model of Emergent Geometry ,” Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 201601 (2008) [arXiv:0712.3011 [hep-th]]. 33

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  23. [23]

    Matrix Models, Gauge Theory and Emergent Geometry

    R. Delgadillo-Blando, D. O’Connor and B. Ydri, “Matrix Models, Gauge Theory and Emergent Geometry ,” JHEP05, 049 (2009) [arXiv:0806.0558 [hep-th]]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    V. G. Filev and D. O’Connor, JHEP05, 167 (2016) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2016)167 [arXiv:1506.01366 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2016)167 2016

  25. [25]

    O’Connor and V

    D. O’Connor and V. G. Filev, PoSCORFU2015, 111 (2016) doi:10.22323/1.263.0111 [arXiv:1605.01611 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.22323/1.263.0111 2016

  26. [26]

    The non-perturbative phase diagram of the BMN matrix model,

    Y. Asano, V. G. Filev, S. Kováˇcik and D. O’Connor, “The non-perturbative phase diagram of the BMN matrix model,” JHEP07, 152 (2018) [arXiv:1805.05314 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Review of M(atrix)-Theory , Type IIB Matrix Model and Matrix String Theory ,

    B. Ydri, “Review of M(atrix)-Theory , Type IIB Matrix Model and Matrix String Theory ,” [arXiv:1708.00734 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Lectures on Matrix Field Theory ,

    B. Ydri, “Lectures on Matrix Field Theory ,” Lect. Notes Phys.929, pp.1-352 (2017) Springer, 2017, ISBN 978-3-319-46002-4, 978-3-319-46003-1 [arXiv:1603.00924 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    Broeckhove, L

    J. Broeckhove, L. Lathouwers, P. van Leuven, J. Molec. Struc. 199 (1989) 245

    work page 1989

  30. [30]

    Heller J.Chem.Phys

    E.J. Heller J.Chem.Phys. 62 (1975) 1544

    work page 1975

  31. [31]

    Gaussian pure states in quantum mechanics and the symplectic group,

    N. Mukunda, R. Simon and G. Sudarshan, “Gaussian pure states in quantum mechanics and the symplectic group,” Phys. Rev. A37, 3028 (1988)

    work page 1988

  32. [32]

    Quantum-noise matrix for multimode systems: U(n) invariance, squeezing, and normal forms,

    R. Simon, N. Mukunda and B. Dutta, “Quantum-noise matrix for multimode systems: U(n) invariance, squeezing, and normal forms,” Phys. Rev. A49(1994) no.3, 1567

    work page 1994

  33. [33]

    Modern Quantum Theory ,

    R. Bertlmann and N. Friis, “Modern Quantum Theory ,” Oxford University Press, 2023, ISBN 978-0-19-968333-8

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Weedbrook, S

    C. Weedbrook, S. Pirandola, R. García-Patrón, N. J. Cerf, T. C. Ralph, J. H. Shapiro and S. Lloyd, “Gaussian quantum information,” Rev. Mod. Phys.84, no.2, 621 (2012) [arXiv:1110.3234 [quant-ph]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  35. [35]

    Lectures on Fuzzy and Fuzzy SUSY Physics,

    A. P. Balachandran, S. Kurkcuoglu and S. Vaidya, “Lectures on Fuzzy and Fuzzy SUSY Physics,”, World-Scientific, Singapore, 2007 [arXiv:hep-th/0511114 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2007

  36. [36]

    Dynamics of entanglement in expanding quantum fields,

    J. Berges, S. Floerchinger and R. Venugopalan, “Dynamics of entanglement in expanding quantum fields,” JHEP04, 145 (2018) [arXiv:1712.09362 [hep-th]]. 34

    work page arXiv 2018

  37. [37]

    A Quantum Source of Entropy for Black Holes,

    L. Bombelli, R. K. Koul, J. Lee and R. D. Sorkin, “A Quantum Source of Entropy for Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. D34, 373-383 (1986)

    work page 1986

  38. [38]

    Expressing entropy globally in terms of (4D) field-correlations,

    R. D. Sorkin, “Expressing entropy globally in terms of (4D) field-correlations,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser.484, 012004 (2014) [arXiv:1205.2953 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    Spacetime entanglement entropy in 1 + 1 dimensions,

    M. Saravani, R. D. Sorkin and Y. K. Yazdi, “Spacetime entanglement entropy in 1 + 1 dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, no.21, 214006 (2014) [arXiv:1311.7146 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2014

  40. [40]

    On the Algebraic Problem Concerning the Normal Forms of Linear Dynamical Systems,

    J. Williamson, (1936) "On the Algebraic Problem Concerning the Normal Forms of Linear Dynamical Systems," American Journal of Mathematics, 58(1), 141–163. (1936) https://doi.org/10.2307/2371062

    work page doi:10.2307/2371062 1936

  41. [41]

    A Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy to Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “A Universal Upper Bound on the Entropy to Energy Ratio for Bounded Systems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 287 (1981)

    work page 1981

  42. [42]

    The Bekenstein Bound,

    D. N. Page, “The Bekenstein Bound,” [arXiv:1804.10623 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Srednicki,Entropy and area,Phys

    M. Srednicki, “Entropy and area,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 666-669 (1993) [arXiv:hep-th/9303048 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 1993

  44. [44]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta, “Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory ,” J. Phys. A42, 504007 (2009) [arXiv:0905.2562 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2009

  45. [45]

    Numerical Determination of the Entanglement Entropy for Free Fields in the Cylinder,

    M. Huerta, “Numerical Determination of the Entanglement Entropy for Free Fields in the Cylinder,” Phys. Lett. B710, 691-696 (2012) [arXiv:1112.1277 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Nishioka,Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group,Rev

    T. Nishioka, “Entanglement entropy: holography and renormalization group,” Rev. Mod. Phys.90, no.3, 035007 (2018) [arXiv:1801.10352 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Witten,Why does quantum field theory in curved spacetime make sense? And what happens to the algebra of observables in the thermodynamic limit?2022.arXiv:2112.11614 [hep-th]

    E. Witten, “Why does quantum field theory in curved spacetime make sense? And what happens to the algebra of observables in the thermodynamic limit?,” [arXiv:2112.11614 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    A Mini-Introduction To Information Theory,

    E. Witten, “A Mini-Introduction To Information Theory ,” Riv. Nuovo Cim.43, no.4, 187-227 (2020) [arXiv:1805.11965 [hep-th]]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Towards a Theory of Entropy Production in the Little and Big Bang,

    T. Kunihiro, B. Muller, A. Ohnishi and A. Schafer, “Towards a Theory of Entropy Production in the Little and Big Bang,” Prog. Theor. Phys.121, 555-575 (2009) [arXiv:0809.4831 [hep-ph]]. 35

    work page arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum: Irreducible Tensors, Spherical Harmonics, Vector Coupling Coefficients, 3nj Symbols,

    D. A. Varshalovich, A. N. Moskalev and V. K. Khersonskii, “Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum: Irreducible Tensors, Spherical Harmonics, Vector Coupling Coefficients, 3nj Symbols,” World Scientific Publishing Company , 1988, ISBN 978-981-4415-49-1, 978-9971-5-0107-5

    work page 1988

  51. [51]

    D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena and H. S. Nastase, JHEP04, 013 (2002) doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/013 [arXiv:hep-th/0202021 [hep-th]]

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2002/04/013 2002

  52. [52]

    ⟨ ˆP lm i ˆP lm i ⟩+ µ2 + l(l+ 1) R2 ⟨ ˆX lm i ˆX lm i ⟩+λH l1l2l3l4 m1m2m3m4 ⟨ ˆX l1m1 1 ˆX l2m2 1 ˆX l3m3 2 ˆX l4m4 2 ⟩ # = 1 2

    S. Kürkcüo ˘glu, B. Özcan,In preparation. Appendices A. F uzzy Sphere and the Polarization Operators A.1. Fuzzy Sphere Definition of the fuzzy sphere is quite well known in the literature. Here we give the basic definition and refer the reader to the references [35] and [28] for an extensive discussion. Let us denote theSU(2)representations in the spin-j=...

    work page