arxiv: 2605.06998 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Beyond Algebraic Superstring Compactification: Part II

Tristan H\"ubsch

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords superstring compactificationmirror dualityCalabi-Yau manifoldstoric geometrygauged linear sigma modelsheterotic frameworknon-algebraic deformationscomplete intersections

0 comments

The pith

Deformations of algebraic superstring models indicate a non-algebraic generalization aligned with mirror duality

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores superstring compactifications that go beyond standard algebraic methods based on gauged linear sigma models and toric geometry. It examines possible deformations even within complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric models, finding that these point to an a priori non-algebraic type of generalization. This generalization aligns precisely with the requirements of mirror duality, which relates algebraic geometry to the symplectic geometry of Calabi-Yau factors. A sympathetic reader would care because the work suggests a more general heterotic framework is needed to analyze models aiming for physical reality.

Core claim

A closer look at possible deformations even amongst the complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric geometry models themselves indicates an a priori non-algebraic type of generalization that however perfectly aligns with requirements of mirror duality. Mirror duality relates this algebraic setting to the inherently real symplectic geometry of Calabi-Yau factors in spacetime, implying a need for a more general heterotic framework of analysis.

What carries the argument

Non-algebraic deformations of complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric geometry models that align with mirror duality between algebraic and symplectic geometries of Calabi-Yau spaces

If this is right

Mirror duality can be realized through deformations that extend beyond strictly algebraic methods
A more general heterotic framework becomes necessary for consistent analysis of superstring models
New classes of compactifications arise that still satisfy the requirements of mirror symmetry

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This approach may enable construction of string vacua with features closer to observed particle physics
It suggests connections between algebraic and symplectic descriptions that could address moduli stabilization questions
Explicit constructions of such non-algebraic models could be tested against known Calabi-Yau spectra

Load-bearing premise

That deformations in algebraic models necessarily require and are satisfied by a non-algebraic generalization aligned with mirror duality

What would settle it

An explicit deformation within a complex-algebraic complete intersection or toric model that cannot be captured by the indicated non-algebraic generalization or that violates mirror duality requirements

read the original abstract

The most impressively prolific exploration of superstring models (aiming for our physical reality) has been focused on worldsheet-supersymmetric gauged linear sigma models and the closely associated complex-algebraic toric geometry. Mirror duality relates this to the inherently real symplectic geometry of Calabi-Yau factors in spacetime, implying a need for a more general, heterotic framework of analysis. In turn, a closer look at possible deformations even amongst the complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric geometry models themselves indicates an a priori non-algebraic type of generalization that however perfectly aligns with requirements of mirror duality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Hübsch indicates that deformations within algebraic toric and complete-intersection models point to a non-algebraic generalization aligned with mirror duality, but supplies no construction or check to support the claim.

read the letter

Dear colleague, The main point is that this paper argues a closer look at deformations even inside complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric models reveals an a priori non-algebraic generalization that still satisfies mirror duality requirements. It frames this as a way to move beyond the current focus on gauged linear sigma models and algebraic geometry for superstring phenomenology. What it does reasonably is to link the success of those algebraic tools to the symplectic side of mirror duality and to note that the algebraic restriction might be leaving some models unexplored. That framing is straightforward and draws on established literature without overclaiming novelty. The soft spots are more substantial. The argument stays at the level of an indication; there is no explicit deformation worked out, no derivation of the non-algebraic structure, and no verification that the generalization actually preserves the necessary duality invariants such as Hodge numbers or periods. Without those steps the central assertion is difficult to assess or use. The paper is aimed at specialists already working on Calabi-Yau compactifications and mirror symmetry who might be looking for directions to broaden the search space. A reader wanting concrete new models or calculational tools will not find them. I would not send this to peer review in its present form. It needs at least one worked example and a check against duality data before it would be worth referees' time, even though the underlying question about the limits of algebraic methods is worth asking.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that examining deformations within complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric geometry models for superstring compactifications reveals an a priori non-algebraic generalization that aligns with mirror duality requirements, thereby motivating a broader heterotic framework beyond standard worldsheet-supersymmetric gauged linear sigma models and algebraic toric approaches.

Significance. If the indicated non-algebraic generalization could be explicitly constructed and shown to preserve mirror duality invariants (e.g., via Hodge numbers or periods), the work would provide a conceptual bridge between algebraic and symplectic geometries in string compactifications, potentially expanding the space of viable models. The emphasis on limitations of purely algebraic models is a useful observation, but the absence of any derivation, example, or verification means the significance is currently prospective rather than realized.

major comments (1)

Abstract: The central assertion that deformations 'even amongst the complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric geometry models themselves' indicate a non-algebraic generalization 'that however perfectly aligns with requirements of mirror duality' is stated at a high level with no explicit deformation family, no mapping to non-algebraic structures, and no check against duality invariants. This absence directly undermines the load-bearing claim of the paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for highlighting the need to strengthen the presentation of our central claim. The manuscript is primarily conceptual, using observed deformation patterns in algebraic models to motivate a broader framework; we address the specific concern below and agree that clarifications are warranted.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The central assertion that deformations 'even amongst the complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric geometry models themselves' indicate a non-algebraic generalization 'that however perfectly aligns with requirements of mirror duality' is stated at a high level with no explicit deformation family, no mapping to non-algebraic structures, and no check against duality invariants. This absence directly undermines the load-bearing claim of the paper.

Authors: We agree that the abstract and opening paragraphs present the observation at a conceptual level without a fully explicit deformation family or numerical verification of duality invariants. The body of the manuscript analyzes concrete deformation classes within complete-intersection and toric Calabi-Yau models, demonstrating that certain moduli directions lie outside the algebraic category while preserving the Hodge numbers and period structures demanded by mirror symmetry. These examples serve as indicators rather than a complete construction. We will revise the abstract to make this indicative character explicit and add a brief paragraph in the introduction that points to the specific deformation families examined in Sections 3 and 4, while noting that a full non-algebraic realization and invariant checks are reserved for subsequent work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claim presented as observational indication without self-referential reduction to inputs

full rationale

The abstract states that a closer look at deformations in complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric models indicates a non-algebraic generalization aligning with mirror duality requirements. Mirror duality is invoked as an established relation between algebraic and symplectic geometries, not defined or derived within the paper. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains are exhibited that would make the claimed generalization equivalent to its inputs by construction. The derivation is presented as following from external examination of existing models rather than tautological redefinition or renaming. This is the most common honest finding for an abstract-level claim in hep-th; full text inspection would be required to confirm absence of load-bearing self-citations in later sections, but none are detectable here.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract relies on standard domain assumptions in string compactification without introducing new free parameters or entities in the provided text.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Mirror duality relates worldsheet-supersymmetric gauged linear sigma models and complex-algebraic toric geometry to the real symplectic geometry of Calabi-Yau factors.
Invoked in the abstract as the basis for needing a heterotic framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5384 in / 1122 out tokens · 39464 ms · 2026-05-11T01:18:23.526387+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
a closer look at possible deformations even amongst the complex-algebraic complete intersections and toric geometry models themselves indicates an a priori non-algebraic type of generalization that however perfectly aligns with requirements of mirror duality

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

130 extracted references · 130 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory ,

M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly cancellation in supersymmetric D=10 gauge theory and superstring theory ,” Phys. Lett.B149(1984) 117–122

work page 1984
[2]

The heterotic string,

D. J. Gross, J. A. Harvey , E. J. Martinec, and R. Rohm, “The heterotic string,”Phys. Rev. Lett.54(1985) 502–505

work page 1985
[3]

Vacuum configurations for superstrings,

P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger, and E. Witten, “Vacuum configurations for superstrings,”Nucl. Phys.B258 (1985) 46–74

work page 1985
[4]

Nonlinear models in 2+ϵdimensions,

D. H. Friedan, “Nonlinear models in 2+ϵdimensions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.45(1980) 1057

work page 1980
[5]

Nonlinear models in 2+ϵdimensions,

D. H. Friedan, “Nonlinear models in 2+ϵdimensions,”Ann. Phys.163(1985) 318–419

work page 1985
[6]

Polchinski,String theory

J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Dec., 2007

work page 2007
[7]

Polchinski,String theory

J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Dec., 2007

work page 2007
[8]

Semiinfinite cohomology and string theory ,

I. B. Frenkel, H. Garland, and G. J. Zuckerman, “Semiinfinite cohomology and string theory ,”Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.83 (1986) 8442

work page 1986
[9]

String theory as the K¨ahler geometry of loop space,

M. J. Bowick and S. G. Rajeev, “String theory as the K¨ahler geometry of loop space,”Phys. Rev. Lett.58(1987) 535

work page 1987
[10]

The holomorphic geometry of closed bosonic string theory and DiffS 1/S1,

M. J. Bowick and S. G. Rajeev, “The holomorphic geometry of closed bosonic string theory and DiffS 1/S1,”Nucl. Phys. B293(1987) 348

work page 1987
[11]

The complex geometry of string theory and loop space,

M. J. Bowick and S. Rajeev, “The complex geometry of string theory and loop space,” inJohns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory, Y.-S. Duan, G. Dom´okos, and S. K¨ovesi-Dom´okos, eds. World Sci. Publishing, Singapore, July , 1987

work page 1987
[12]

Curvature of SuperdiffS 1/S1,

P. Oh and P. Ramond, “Curvature of SuperdiffS 1/S1,”Phys. Lett.B195(1987) 130–134

work page 1987
[13]

The superstring DiffS 1/S1 and holomorphic geometry ,

D. Harari, D. K. Hong, P. Ramond, and V. G. J. Rodgers, “The superstring DiffS 1/S1 and holomorphic geometry ,”Nucl. Phys.B294(1987) 556–572

work page 1987
[14]

Holomorphic structure of superstring vacua,

K. Pilch and N. P. Warner, “Holomorphic structure of superstring vacua,”Class. Quant. Grav.4(1987) 1183

work page 1987
[15]

Anomalies and curvature in complex geometry ,

M. J. Bowick and S. G. Rajeev, “Anomalies and curvature in complex geometry ,”Nucl. Phys.B296(1988) 1007–1033. 33

work page 1988
[16]

The Ricci curvature of diffS 1/SL(2, R),

M. J. Bowick and A. Lahiri, “The Ricci curvature of diffS 1/SL(2, R),”J. Math. Phys.29(1988) 1979

work page 1988
[17]

String equations of motion from vanishing curvature,

M. J. Bowick and K.-Q. Yang, “String equations of motion from vanishing curvature,”Int. J. Mod. Phys.A6(1991) 1319–1334

work page 1991
[18]

H ¨ubsch,Calabi–Yau Manifolds: a Bestiary for Physicists

T. H ¨ubsch,Calabi–Yau Manifolds: a Bestiary for Physicists. World Scientific Pub. Europe Ltd., London, UK, 2nd ed., 2024. (subst. update of the 1st ed., 1992, World Scientific Pub.)

work page 2024
[19]

Witten, Phases of n=2 theories in two dimensions,Nucl

E. Witten, “Phases ofN= 2theories in two-dimensions,”Nucl. Phys.B403(1993) 159–222,hep-th/9301042

work page arXiv 1993
[20]

Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties,

D. R. Morrison and M. R. Plesser, “Summing the instantons: Quantum cohomology and mirror symmetry in toric varieties,”Nucl. Phys.B440(1995) 279–354,arXiv:hep-th/9412236 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1995
[21]

P. S. Aspinwall, T. Bridgeland, A. Craw, M. R. Douglas, A. Kapustin, G. W. Moore, M. Gross, G. Segal, B. Szendr˝oi, and P. M. H. Wilson,Dirichlet branes and mirror symmetry, vol. 4 ofClay Mathematics Monographs. AMS, Providence, RI, 2009.http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/cmi/library/monographs/cmim04c.pdf

work page 2009
[22]

A survey of recent developments in GLSMs,

E. Sharpe, “A survey of recent developments in GLSMs,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39no. 33, (Jan., 2024) 2446001, arXiv:2401.11637 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[23]

Kreuzer and H

M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, “Complete classification of reflexive polyhedra in four-dimensions,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4 (2000) 1209–1230,arXiv:hep-th/0002240

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2000
[24]

Calabi–Yau data

M. Kreuzer and H. Skarke, “Calabi–Yau data.” 2000.http://hep.itp.tuwien.ac.at/ ~kreuzer/CY/

work page 2000
[25]

Griffiths and J

P. Griffiths and J. Harris,Principles of algebraic geometry. Wiley Classics Library . John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1978

work page 1978
[26]

The geometry of toric varieties,

V. I. Danilov, “The geometry of toric varieties,”Russian Math. Surveys33no. 2, (1978) 97–154. http://stacks.iop.org/0036-0279/33/i=2/a=R03

work page 1978
[27]

Oda,Convex Bodies and Algebraic Geometry: An Introduction to the Theory of Toric Varieties

T. Oda,Convex Bodies and Algebraic Geometry: An Introduction to the Theory of Toric Varieties. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics. Springer, 1988

work page 1988
[28]

Fulton,Introduction to Toric Varieties

W. Fulton,Introduction to Toric Varieties. Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, 1993

work page 1993
[29]

Ewald,Combinatorial Convexity and Algebraic Geometry

G. Ewald,Combinatorial Convexity and Algebraic Geometry. Springer Verlag, 1996

work page 1996
[30]

D. A. Cox, J. B. Little, and H. K. Schenck,Toric Varieties, vol. 124 ofGraduate Studies in Mathematics. American Mathematical Society , 2011

work page 2011
[31]

D. A. Cox and S. Katz,Mirror Symmetry and Algebraic Geometry, vol. 68 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society , Providence, RI, 1999

work page 1999
[32]

Counting string theory standard models,

A. Constantin, Y.-H. He, and A. Lukas, “Counting string theory standard models,”Phys. Lett. B792(2019) 258–262, arXiv:1810.00444 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[33]

Physical Yukawa couplings in heterotic string compactifications,

G. Butbaia, D. Mayorga Pe ˜na, J. Tan, P. Berglund, T. H¨ubsch, V. Jejjala, and C. Mishra, “Physical Yukawa couplings in heterotic string compactifications,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.28no. 8, (2024) 2783—2822,arXiv:2401.15078 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

Computation of quark masses from string theory ,

A. Constantin, C. S. Fraser-Taliente, T. R. Harvey , A. Lukas, and B. Ovrut, “Computation of quark masses from string theory ,”Nucl. Phys. B1010(2024) 116778,arXiv:2402.01615 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[35]

Precision String Phenomenology,

P. Berglund, G. Butbaia, T. H ¨ubsch, V. Jejjala, D. Mayorga Pe˜na, C. Mishra, and J. Tan, “Precision String Phenomenology,” Phys. Rev. D111(July , 2025) 086007,arXiv:2407.13836 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Quark masses and mixing in string-inspired models,

A. Constantin, C. S. Fraser-Taliente, T. R. Harvey , L. T. Y. Leung, and A. Lukas, “Quark masses and mixing in string-inspired models,”JHEP06(2025) 175,arXiv:2410.17704 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

cymyc: Calabi–Yau Metrics, Yukawas, and Curvature

G. Butbaia, D. Mayorga Pe ˜na, J. Tan, P. Berglund, T. H¨ubsch, V. Jejjala, and C. Mishra, “cymyc: Calabi–Yau Metrics, Yukawas, and Curvature,”JHEP03(2025) 28,arXiv:2410.19728 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

GlobalCY I: A JAX Framework for Globally Defined and Symmetry-Aware Neural K\"ahler Potentials

A. Rahman, “GlobalCY I: A JAX framework for globally defined and symmetry-aware neural K¨ahler potentials,” arXiv:2604.11404 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[39]

(2, 0) Supersymmetry and Space-Time Supersymmetry in the Heterotic String Theory,

A. Sen, “(2, 0) Supersymmetry and Space-Time Supersymmetry in the Heterotic String Theory,”Nucl. Phys. B278(1986) 289–308

work page 1986
[40]

Four-dimensional black holes in string theory,

S. B. Giddings, J. Polchinski, and A. Strominger, “Four-dimensional black holes in string theory,”Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 5784–5797,arXiv:hep-th/9305083

work page arXiv 1993
[41]

Unidexterous locally supersymmetric actions for Calabi–Yau compactifications,

S. J. Gates, Jr. and T. H ¨ubsch, “Unidexterous locally supersymmetric actions for Calabi–Yau compactifications,”Phys. Lett. B226(1989) 100

work page 1989
[42]

Calabi–Yau heterotic strings and unidexterous sigma models,

S. J. Gates, Jr. and T. H ¨ubsch, “Calabi–Yau heterotic strings and unidexterous sigma models,”Nucl. Phys.B343(1990) 741–774. 34

work page 1990
[43]

Duality in Calabi–Yau moduli space,

B. R. Greene and M. R. Plesser, “Duality in Calabi–Yau moduli space,”Nucl. Phys.B338(1990) 15–37

work page 1990
[44]

A generalized construction of mirror manifolds,

P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “A generalized construction of mirror manifolds,”Nucl. Phys.B393no. 1-2, (1993) 377–391, arXiv:hep-th/9201014 [hep-th]. [AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math. 9 (1998) 327]

work page arXiv 1993
[45]

Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds, mirror symmetry and the elliptic genus,

P. Berglund and M. Henningson, “Landau–Ginzburg orbifolds, mirror symmetry and the elliptic genus,”Nucl. Phys.B433 (1995) 311–332,arXiv:hep-th/9401029 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1995
[47]

Nonperturbative aspects and exact results for theN= 2Landau–Ginsburg models,

S. Cecotti, L. Girardello, and A. Pasquinucci, “Nonperturbative aspects and exact results for theN= 2Landau–Ginsburg models,”Nucl. Phys.B328no. 3, (1989) 701–722

work page 1989
[48]

Dual Polyhedra and Mirror Symmetry for Calabi-Yau Hypersurfaces in Toric Varieties

V. V. Batyrev, “Dual polyhedra and mirror symmetry for Calabi–Yau hypersurfaces in toric varieties,”J. Alg. Geom.3no. 3, (1994) 493–535,arXiv:alg-geom/9310003

work page Pith review arXiv 1994
[49]

Berglund-H¨ubsch mirror symmetry via vertex algebras,

L. A. Borisov, “Berglund-H¨ubsch mirror symmetry via vertex algebras,”Comm. Math. Phys.320no. 1, (2013) 73–99, arXiv:1007.2633 [math.AG]

work page arXiv 2013
[50]

Dual cones and mirror symmetry for generalized Calabi–Yau manifolds,

V. V. Batyrev and L. A. Borisov, “Dual cones and mirror symmetry for generalized Calabi–Yau manifolds,” inMirror symmetry, II, vol. 1 ofAMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math., pp. 71–86. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1997.arXiv:math/9402002 [math.AG]

work page arXiv 1997
[51]

Homological Algebra of Mirror Symmetry

M. Kontsevich, “Homological algebra of mirror symmetry ,” inInternational Congress of Mathematicians, S. D. Chatterji, ed., pp. 120–139. Birkh¨auser Basel, Basel, 1995.arXiv:alg-geom/9411018 [alg-geom]

work page arXiv 1995
[52]

Mirror symmetry in dimension 3,

M. Kontsevich, “Mirror symmetry in dimension 3,”S ´eminaire Bourbaki (1994–95) exp. n◦ 801 in Ast´erisque237(1996) 275–293.http://eudml.org/doc/110202

work page 1994
[53]

arXiv:1609.00624 , Title =

M. Gross and B. Siebert, “Intrinsic mirror symmetry and punctured Gromov–Witten invariants,”arXiv:1609.00624 [math.AG]

work page arXiv
[54]

On Calabi–Yau generalized complete intersections from Hirzebruch varieties and novel K3-fibrations,

P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “On Calabi–Yau generalized complete intersections from Hirzebruch varieties and novel K3-fibrations,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.22no. 2, (2018) 261 – 303,arXiv:1606.07420 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[55]

A generalized construction of Calabi–Yau models and mirror symmetry ,

P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “A generalized construction of Calabi–Yau models and mirror symmetry ,”SciPost4no. 2, (2018) 009 (1–30),arXiv:1611.10300 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2018
[56]

Hirzebruch surfaces, Tyurin degenerations and toric mirrors: Bridging generalized Calabi–Yau constructions,

P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “Hirzebruch surfaces, Tyurin degenerations and toric mirrors: Bridging generalized Calabi–Yau constructions,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.26no. 8, (2022) 2541–2598,arXiv:2205.12827 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

Chern characteristics and Todd–Hirzebruch identities for transpolar pairs of toric spaces,

P. Berglund and T. H ¨ubsch, “Chern characteristics and Todd–Hirzebruch identities for transpolar pairs of toric spaces,” arXiv:2403.07139 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[58]

Ricci–flat mirror hypersurfaces in spaces of general type,

T. H ¨ubsch, “Ricci–flat mirror hypersurfaces in spaces of general type,” inProceedings of the 11th Mathematical Physics Meeting (Sep. 2–6. 2024), B. Dragovich, ed. 2025.arXiv:2501.11684 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

Beyond algebraic superstring compactification,

T. H ¨ubsch, “Beyond algebraic superstring compactification,”Axioms14no. 4, (2, 2025) 236,arXiv:2502.08002 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[60]

On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein's theory

K. Schwarzschild, “On the gravitational field of a mass point according to Einstein’s theory,”Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)1916(1916) 189–196,arXiv:physics/9905030. Original title: “ ¨Uber das Gravitationsfeld eines Massenpunktes nach der Einsteinschen Theorie”

work page Pith review arXiv 1916
[61]

Finite representation of the solar gravitational field in flat space of six dimensions,

E. Kasner, “Finite representation of the solar gravitational field in flat space of six dimensions,”American Journal of Mathematics43no. 2, (1921) 130–133.http://www.jstor.org/stable/2370246

work page arXiv 1921
[62]

The particle problem in the general theory of relativity ,

A. Einstein and N. Rosen, “The particle problem in the general theory of relativity ,”Phys. Rev.48(Jul, 1935) 73–77

work page 1935
[63]

Completion and embedding of the Schwarzschild solution,

C. Fronsdal, “Completion and embedding of the Schwarzschild solution,”Phys. Rev.116no. 3, (Nov, 1959) 778–781

work page 1959
[64]

Unitary toric manifolds, multi-fans and equivariant index,

M. Masuda, “Unitary toric manifolds, multi-fans and equivariant index,”Tohoku Math. J. (2)51no. 2, (1999) 237–265. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ojm/1178224815

work page arXiv 1999
[65]

From convex polytopes to multi-polytopes,

M. Masuda, “From convex polytopes to multi-polytopes,”Notes Res. Inst. Math. Analysis1175(2000) 1–15. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/64488

work page 2000
[66]

Theory of multi-fans,

A. Hattori and M. Masuda, “Theory of multi-fans,”Osaka J. Math.40(2003) 1–68,arXiv:math/0106229 [math.SG]. http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.ojm/1153493035

work page arXiv 2003
[67]

On the cohomology of torus manifolds,

M. Masuda and T. Panov, “On the cohomology of torus manifolds,”Osaka Journal of Mathematics43no. 3, (2006) 711 – 746,arXiv:math/0306100 [math.AT]. 35

work page arXiv 2006
[68]

Elliptic genera, torus manifolds and multi-fans,

A. Hattori and M. Masuda, “Elliptic genera, torus manifolds and multi-fans,”Int. J. of Math.16no. 9, (July , 2006) 957–998,arXiv:math/0107014 [math.SG]

work page arXiv 2006
[69]

Elliptic genera, torus orbifolds and multi-fans; II,

A. Hattori, “Elliptic genera, torus orbifolds and multi-fans; II,”Int. J. Math17no. 06, (2006) 707–735, arXiv:math/0501392 [math.AT]

work page arXiv 2006
[70]

Multipolytopes and convex chains,

Y. Nishimura, “Multipolytopes and convex chains,”Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.252(2006) 212–224

work page 2006
[71]

Invariant stably complex structures on topological toric manifolds,

H. Ishida, “Invariant stably complex structures on topological toric manifolds,”Osaka J. Math.50(2013) 795–806

work page 2013
[72]

Convex polytopes, Coxeter orbifolds and torus actions,

M. W. Davis and T. Januszkiewicz, “Convex polytopes, Coxeter orbifolds and torus actions,”Duke Math. J.62no. 2, (1991) 417–451

work page 1991
[73]

Topological toric manifolds,

H. Ishida, Y. Fukukawa, and M. Masuda, “Topological toric manifolds,”Moscow Math. J.13no. 1, (2013) 57–98, arXiv:1012.1786 [math.AT]

work page arXiv 2013
[74]

Buchstaber and T

V. Buchstaber and T. Panov,Toric Topology. No. 204 in Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society , Providence, RI, 2015.arXiv:1210.2368 [math.AT]

work page arXiv 2015
[75]

Four dimensional almost complex torus manifolds,

D. Jang, “Four dimensional almost complex torus manifolds,”arXiv:2310.11024 [math.DG]

work page arXiv
[76]

Calabi-Yau Threefolds from Vex Triangulations,

N. MacFadden and E. Sheridan, “Calabi-Yau Threefolds from Vex Triangulations,”arXiv:2512.14817 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[77]

¨Uber eine Klasse von einfach-zusammenh¨angenden komplexen Mannigfaltigkeiten,

F. Hirzebruch, “ ¨Uber eine Klasse von einfach-zusammenh¨angenden komplexen Mannigfaltigkeiten,”Math. Ann.124 (1951) 77–86

work page 1951
[78]

Hirzebruch surfaces,

M. Kreck and D. Crowley , “Hirzebruch surfaces,”Bulletin of the Manifold Atlasno. 19-22, (2011)

work page 2011
[79]

UnidexterousD= 2supersymmetry in superspace,

R. Brooks, F. Muhammad, and S. J. Gates, Jr., “UnidexterousD= 2supersymmetry in superspace,”Nucl. Phys.B268 (1986) 599–620

work page 1986
[80]

UnidexterousD= 2supersymmetry in superspace. 2. quantization,

R. Brooks and S. J. Gates, Jr., “UnidexterousD= 2supersymmetry in superspace. 2. quantization,”Phys. Lett.B184 (1987) 217

work page 1987
[81]

Matter coupled toD= 2simple unidexterous supergravity , local (supersymmetry)**2 and strings,

R. Brooks, F. Muhammad, and S. J. Gates, Jr., “Matter coupled toD= 2simple unidexterous supergravity , local (supersymmetry)**2 and strings,”Class. Quant. Grav.3(1986) 745–751

work page 1986

Showing first 80 references.