pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07464 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Broken and restored: a holographic constraint for AdS vacua with orbifolds

Filippo Revello , Vincent Van Hemelryck
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords AdS vacuaorbifoldsholographic constraintsO-planeshomology classescubic couplingstype II string theoryscalar operators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Holographic consistency requires that O-planes wrap cycles only within one homology class for AdS orbifolds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper checks whether a proposed holographic constraint, the vanishing of cubic couplings between certain scalar operators, holds in type II AdS3 and AdS4 vacua built on abelian orbifolds. It finds generic violations on Z2 x Z2 x Z2 and Z2 x Z2 constructions, including scale-separated and DGKT-CFI models. These violations are removed when the orbifold group is enlarged to a non-abelian extension that projects out exactly the offending operators. The result points to a geometric restriction on the compactification: O-planes cannot wrap cycles belonging to distinct homology classes if a consistent large-N dual is to exist.

Core claim

In type II string theory, AdS vacua on Z2 x Z2 x Z2 and Z2 x Z2 orbifolds generically produce non-vanishing cubic couplings for (super-)extremal scalar operators, violating the holographic constraint, while the Z3 x Z3 case satisfies it. The violation is cured by enlarging the orbifold group to a suitable non-abelian extension that removes precisely those operators from the spectrum. The authors conclude that consistency of the putative holographic dual therefore imposes a non-trivial restriction on the compactification geometry, in particular that O-planes cannot wrap cycles in distinct homology classes.

What carries the argument

Orbifold group enlargement that projects out specific scalar operators to enforce vanishing of the constrained cubic couplings.

If this is right

  • The constraint is satisfied on the Z3 x Z3 orbifold but violated on smaller abelian orbifolds such as Z2 x Z2 x Z2.
  • Scale-separated AdS solutions on these orbifolds become consistent only after the orbifold group is enlarged.
  • DGKT-CFI-type models on Z2 orbifolds require the same projection to eliminate the violating operators.
  • O-planes wrapping cycles in distinct homology classes produce the inconsistent cubic couplings that must be projected out.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same projection requirement could appear in other orientifold compactifications beyond the orbifolds studied here.
  • Explicit constructions of the required non-abelian orbifolds would give concrete examples of the allowed geometries.
  • The space of flux vacua compatible with a holographic dual is narrowed by this additional geometric filter.

Load-bearing premise

The holographic constraint of vanishing cubic couplings for (super-)extremal scalar operators must hold for every weakly-coupled AdS vacuum that admits a large-N dual, with supergravity spectra correctly identified.

What would settle it

An explicit spectrum computation in an enlarged non-abelian orbifold model where the cubic couplings remain non-zero despite the projection, or a concrete AdS vacuum on an abelian orbifold where the couplings vanish without any group enlargement.

read the original abstract

It has been suggested that families of weakly-coupled AdS vacua with a large-$N$ holographic dual must satisfy non-trivial consistency requirements, which amount to the vanishing of certain cubic couplings, corresponding to (super-)extremal arrangements of scalar operators. While this constraint is known to hold in the simplest incarnation of the DGKT scenario in massive type IIA string theory, i.e. on the $\mathbb{Z}_3\times \mathbb{Z}_3$ orbifold, we find that it is generically violated for type II AdS$_3$ and AdS$_4$ vacua arising from $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ and $\mathbb{Z}_2 \times \mathbb{Z}_2$ orbifolds respectively, including scale-separated solutions and DGKT-CFI-type models. In most cases, however, this can be cured by enlarging the orbifold group to a suitable (non-abelian) extension that projects out precisely those scalar operators that would otherwise participate in the constrained cubic couplings. Our results suggest that consistency of the putative holographic dual imposes a non-trivial restriction on the compactification geometry, indicating in particular that O-planes cannot wrap cycles in distinct homology classes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates a proposed holographic consistency constraint requiring vanishing of certain cubic couplings for (super-)extremal scalar operators in weakly-coupled AdS vacua admitting large-N duals. It confirms the constraint holds for the DGKT scenario on the Z3×Z3 orbifold but reports violations for Z2×Z2×Z2 orbifolds yielding AdS3 vacua and Z2×Z2 orbifolds yielding AdS4 vacua (including scale-separated and DGKT-CFI models). Violations are attributed to the survival of specific scalar operators in the Kaluza-Klein spectrum; these are claimed to be cured by enlarging the orbifold group to suitable non-abelian extensions that project out the offending operators. The authors conclude that holographic consistency imposes a non-trivial restriction on the compactification geometry, in particular that O-planes cannot wrap cycles in distinct homology classes.

Significance. If substantiated, the results would indicate that holographic consistency can enforce geometric selection rules on string compactifications with orbifolds, extending checks of the constraint beyond the simplest DGKT case and providing explicit examples of both violation and restoration via orbifold projections. The explicit treatment of multiple orbifold groups, their non-abelian extensions, and scale-separated solutions constitutes a concrete strength, offering testable instances of the constraint's implications for AdS model building.

major comments (2)
  1. [KK spectrum analysis and constraint violations for Z2×Z2×Z2 and Z2×Z2 orbifolds] The identification of violations of the holographic constraint (vanishing of specific cubic couplings) is based on the presence of certain (super-)extremal scalar operators in the KK spectrum after abelian orbifold projection, for example in the Z2×Z2×Z2 and Z2×Z2 cases. However, the manuscript does not provide explicit computations of the relevant cubic interaction vertices in the effective 4d or 3d supergravity action. Without these, it remains possible that bulk selection rules, derivative structure, or flux-induced cancellations render the couplings zero even when the operators survive the projection, which would remove the reported violations and the derived restriction on O-plane homology classes.
  2. [Orbifold extensions and restoration mechanism] The restoration via non-abelian orbifold extensions is shown to project out the problematic operators, but the paper should confirm that the extended groups continue to support the original AdS vacua (including any scale separation or flux quantization) and do not introduce new (super-)extremal scalars that would violate the constraint.
minor comments (2)
  1. The precise statement of the holographic constraint (including the specific operators and the form of the cubic couplings) could be restated more explicitly in the introduction for readers unfamiliar with the prior literature.
  2. A summary table listing the orbifold groups, the violating operators, and the restoring extensions for each model would improve clarity and allow easier comparison across the AdS3 and AdS4 cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We respond to the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The identification of violations of the holographic constraint (vanishing of specific cubic couplings) is based on the presence of certain (super-)extremal scalar operators in the KK spectrum after abelian orbifold projection, for example in the Z2×Z2×Z2 and Z2×Z2 cases. However, the manuscript does not provide explicit computations of the relevant cubic interaction vertices in the effective 4d or 3d supergravity action. Without these, it remains possible that bulk selection rules, derivative structure, or flux-induced cancellations render the couplings zero even when the operators survive the projection, which would remove the reported violations and the derived restriction on O-plane homology classes.

    Authors: We agree that explicit computation of the cubic vertices would provide stronger evidence. Our identification of violations rests on the survival of the relevant scalar operators in the KK spectrum after the abelian projections, together with the fact that the effective supergravity actions obtained from type II reductions on these orbifolds generically include cubic terms for such modes; no additional symmetries or flux structures in the models under consideration are expected to enforce vanishing of these specific couplings. We will revise the manuscript to include a dedicated paragraph explaining this reasoning, drawing on the general form of the KK-reduced action and the absence of obvious cancellation mechanisms, thereby addressing the possibility of hidden cancellations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The restoration via non-abelian orbifold extensions is shown to project out the problematic operators, but the paper should confirm that the extended groups continue to support the original AdS vacua (including any scale separation or flux quantization) and do not introduce new (super-)extremal scalars that would violate the constraint.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this requirement. The non-abelian extensions were constructed to be compatible with the original flux quanta, O-plane charges, and homology classes, thereby preserving the same AdS solutions (including scale separation where present) and the associated flux quantization conditions. We have verified the KK spectra of the extended groups and confirmed that the problematic operators are projected out without introducing new (super-)extremal scalars. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit statements and, where appropriate, summary tables confirming preservation of the vacua and the absence of new violating operators. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: external constraint applied to independent models

full rationale

The derivation takes the holographic constraint (vanishing of specific cubic couplings for extremal scalars) from prior literature and applies it to newly constructed orbifold compactifications by computing their KK spectra. Violations are identified when certain scalar operators survive the projection, and restoration occurs via standard non-abelian orbifold extensions that remove those operators. No equation or step equates the output geometric restriction to a redefinition or fit of the input spectra; the central claim remains an application of an independent consistency condition rather than a tautology. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks for the spectra and projections used.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, the central claim rests on the external holographic constraint and the validity of the orbifold spectrum calculations; no explicit free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Weakly-coupled AdS vacua with large-N holographic duals must satisfy vanishing of certain cubic couplings corresponding to (super-)extremal scalar operators.
    This is the consistency requirement taken from prior suggestions and used as the benchmark for the new orbifold models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1403 out tokens · 49632 ms · 2026-05-11T01:47:16.111251+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Type IIA moduli stabilization,

    O. DeWolfe, A. Giryavets, S. Kachru and W. Taylor,Type IIA moduli stabilization,JHEP07 (2005) 066 [hep-th/0505160]

    work page arXiv 2005

  2. [2]

    P. G. Camara, A. Font and L. E. Ibanez,Fluxes, moduli fixing and MSSM-like vacua in a simple IIA orientifold,JHEP09(2005) 013 [hep-th/0506066]

    work page arXiv 2005

  3. [3]

    Cribiori, D

    N. Cribiori, D. Junghans, V. Van Hemelryck, T. Van Riet and T. Wrase,Scale-separated AdS4 vacua of IIA orientifolds and M-theory,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 126014 [2107.00019]

    work page arXiv 2021

  4. [4]

    Carrasco, T

    R. Carrasco, T. Coudarchet, F. Marchesano and D. Prieto,New families of scale separated vacua,JHEP11(2023) 094 [2309.00043]

    work page arXiv 2023

  5. [5]

    Weak G2 manifolds and scale separation in M-theory from type IIA backgrounds,

    V. Van Hemelryck,Weak G2 manifolds and scale separation in M-theory from type IIA backgrounds,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 106013 [2408.16609]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    No-scale and scale-separated flux vacua from IIA on G2 orientifolds,

    F. Farakos, G. Tringas and T. Van Riet,No-scale and scale-separated flux vacua from IIA on G2 orientifolds,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 659 [2005.05246]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    On/off scale separation,

    F. Farakos, M. Morittu and G. Tringas,On/off scale separation,JHEP10(2023) 067 [2304.14372]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Farakos and G

    F. Farakos and G. Tringas,Integer dual dimensions in scale-separated AdS 3 from massive IIA, JHEP06(2025) 130 [2502.08215]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    T-dualities and scale-separated AdS3 in massless IIA on(X6 ×S 1)/Z2,

    G. Tringas,T-dualities and scale-separated AdS 3 in massless IIA on(X 6 ×S 1)/Z2,2603.26615

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Supersymmetric scale-separated AdS3 orientifold vacua of type IIB,

    V. Van Hemelryck,Supersymmetric scale-separated AdS 3 orientifold vacua of type IIB,JHEP 10(2025) 109 [2502.04791]

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Z. Miao, M. Rajaguru, G. Tringas and T. Wrase,T-dualities and scale-separated AdS 3 in type I, 2509.12801. – 38 –

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    Classical scale-separated AdS3 vacua in heterotic string theory,

    G. Tringas and T. Wrase,Classical scale-separated AdS 3 vacua in heterotic string theory, 2511.07781

    work page arXiv

  13. [13]

    Cribiori, G

    N. Cribiori, G. Dall’agata and F. Farakos,Weak gravity versus de Sitter,JHEP04(2021) 046 [2011.06597]

    work page arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Weak gravity versus scale separation,

    N. Cribiori and G. Dall’Agata,Weak gravity versus scale separation,JHEP06(2022) 006 [2203.05559]

    work page arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Pure supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland,

    M. Montero, M. Rocek and C. Vafa,Pure supersymmetric AdS and the Swampland,JHEP01 (2023) 094 [2212.01697]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    On scale-separated supersymmetric AdS2 flux vacua,

    N. Cribiori, F. Farakos and N. Liatsos,On scale-separated supersymmetric AdS 2 flux vacua, Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 213 [2411.04932]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Scale-separated vacua with extended supersymmetry

    N. Cribiori, F. Farakos and A. Zarafonitis,Scale-separated vacua with extended supersymmetry, 2604.26755

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  18. [18]

    Baines and T

    S. Baines and T. Van Riet,Smearing orientifolds in flux compactifications can be OK,Class. Quant. Grav.37(2020) 195015 [2005.09501]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    O-Plane Backreaction and Scale Separation in Type IIA Flux Vacua,

    D. Junghans,O-Plane Backreaction and Scale Separation in Type IIA Flux Vacua,Fortsch. Phys.68(2020) 2000040 [2003.06274]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    On supersymmetric AdS4 orientifold vacua,

    F. Marchesano, E. Palti, J. Quirant and A. Tomasiello,On supersymmetric AdS 4 orientifold vacua,JHEP08(2020) 087 [2003.13578]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    O6-plane backreaction on scale-separated Type IIA AdS3 vacua,

    M. Emelin, F. Farakos and G. Tringas,O6-plane backreaction on scale-separated Type IIA AdS 3 vacua,JHEP07(2022) 133 [2202.13431]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Montero and I

    M. Montero and I. Valenzuela,Quantum corrections to DGKT and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,JHEP07(2025) 057 [2412.00189]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Aharony, Y

    O. Aharony, Y. E. Antebi and M. Berkooz,On the Conformal Field Theory Duals of type IIA AdS(4) Flux Compactifications,JHEP02(2008) 093 [0801.3326]

    work page arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    J. P. Conlon and F. Quevedo,Putting the Boot into the Swampland,JHEP03(2019) 005 [1811.06276]

    work page arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    J. P. Conlon and F. Revello,Moduli Stabilisation and the Holographic Swampland,LHEP2020 (2020) 171 [2006.01021]

    work page arXiv 2020

  26. [26]

    Backtracking AdS flux vacua,

    F. Apers, M. Montero and I. Valenzuela,Backtracking AdS flux vacua,JHEP03(2026) 161 [2506.03314]

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Apers,On the DGKT brane dual and its decoupling,2601.15093

    F. Apers,On the DGKT brane dual and its decoupling,2601.15093

    work page arXiv

  28. [28]

    Bedroya and P

    A. Bedroya and P. J. Steinhardt,Holography vs. Scale Separation,2509.25313

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    A compendium of logarithmic corrections in AdS/CFT,

    N. Bobev, M. David, J. Hong, V. Reys and X. Zhang,A compendium of logarithmic corrections in AdS/CFT,JHEP04(2024) 020 [2312.08909]

    work page arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Perlmutter,Rigorous Holographic Bound on AdS Scale Separation,Phys

    E. Perlmutter,Rigorous Holographic Bound on AdS Scale Separation,Phys. Rev. Lett.133 (2024) 061601 [2402.19358]

    work page arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    A Holographic Constraint on Scale Separation

    N. Bobev, H. Paul and F. Revello,A Holographic Constraint on Scale Separation,2512.11031

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    J. P. Conlon, S. Ning and F. Revello,Exploring the holographic Swampland,JHEP04(2022) 117 [2110.06245]. – 39 –

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    Comments on classical AdS flux vacua with scale separation,

    F. Apers, M. Montero, T. Van Riet and T. Wrase,Comments on classical AdS flux vacua with scale separation,JHEP05(2022) 167 [2202.00682]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Integer conformal dimensions for type IIa flux vacua,

    F. Apers, J. P. Conlon, S. Ning and F. Revello,Integer conformal dimensions for type IIa flux vacua,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 106029 [2202.09330]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Herraez, L

    A. Herraez, L. E. Ibanez, F. Marchesano and G. Zoccarato,The Type IIA Flux Potential, 4-forms and Freed-Witten anomalies,JHEP09(2018) 018 [1802.05771]

    work page arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Marchesano and J

    F. Marchesano and J. Quirant,A Landscape of AdS Flux Vacua,JHEP12(2019) 110 [1908.11386]

    work page arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Type II orientifold flux vacua in 3D,

    A. Arboleya, A. Guarino and M. Morittu,Type II orientifold flux vacua in 3D,JHEP12(2024) 087 [2408.01403]

    work page arXiv 2024

  38. [38]

    A note on O6 intersections in AdS flux vacua,

    D. Junghans,A note on O6 intersections in AdS flux vacua,JHEP02(2024) 126 [2310.17695]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Quirant,Noninteger conformal dimensions for type IIA flux vacua,Phys

    J. Quirant,Noninteger conformal dimensions for type IIA flux vacua,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 066017 [2204.00014]

    work page arXiv 2022

  40. [40]

    Ning,Holographic perspectives on models of moduli stabilization in M-theory,JHEP09 (2022) 042 [2206.13332]

    S. Ning,Holographic perspectives on models of moduli stabilization in M-theory,JHEP09 (2022) 042 [2206.13332]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Plauschinn,Mass spectrum of type IIB flux compactifications — comments on AdS vacua and conformal dimensions,JHEP02(2023) 257 [2210.04528]

    E. Plauschinn,Mass spectrum of type IIB flux compactifications — comments on AdS vacua and conformal dimensions,JHEP02(2023) 257 [2210.04528]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Andriot and G

    D. Andriot and G. Tringas,Extensions of a scale-separated AdS 4 solution and their mass spectrum,JHEP01(2024) 008 [2310.06115]

    work page arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Arboleya, A

    ´A. Arboleya, A. Guarino and M. Morittu,On type IIB AdS33 flux vacua with scale separation and integer conformal dimensions,PoSCORFU2024(2025) 184 [2504.21508]

    work page arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Taxonomy of type II orientifold flux vacua in 3D,

    ´A. Arboleya, G. Casagrande, A. Guarino and M. Morittu,Taxonomy of type II orientifold flux vacua in 3D,2512.13433

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Shift Symmetries in (Anti) de Sitter Space

    J. Bonifacio, K. Hinterbichler, A. Joyce and R. A. Rosen,Shift Symmetries in (Anti) de Sitter Space,JHEP02(2019) 178 [1812.08167]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  46. [46]

    Apers,Aspects of AdS flux vacua with integer conformal dimensions,JHEP05(2023) 040 [2211.04187]

    F. Apers,Aspects of AdS flux vacua with integer conformal dimensions,JHEP05(2023) 040 [2211.04187]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    D’Hoker, D

    E. D’Hoker, D. Z. Freedman, S. D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L. Rastelli,Extremal correlators in the AdS / CFT correspondence,hep-th/9908160

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    Aprile, J

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, H. Paul, F. Sanfilippo, M. Santagata et al.,Single particle operators and their correlators in freeN= 4 SYM,JHEP11(2020) 072 [2007.09395]

    work page arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Bobev and H

    N. Bobev and H. Paul,Holographic correlators beyond maximal supersymmetry,JHEP09 (2025) 087 [2505.20400]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    S. M. Chester, R. Mouland and J. van Muiden,Extremal couplings, graviton exchange, and gluon scattering in AdS,JHEP10(2025) 027 [2505.23948]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    S. M. Chester, R. Mouland, J. van Muiden and C. Virally,Extremal couplings and gluon scattering in M-theory,2512.04057

    work page arXiv

  52. [52]

    Castro and P

    A. Castro and P. J. Martinez,Revisiting extremal couplings in AdS/CFT,JHEP12(2024) 157 [2409.15410]. – 40 –

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    D. D. Joyce,Compact riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomyg 2. i,Journal of Differential Geometry43(1996)

    work page 1996

  54. [54]

    D. D. Joyce,Compact riemannian 7-manifolds with holonomyg 2. ii,Journal of Differential Geometry43(1996)

    work page 1996

  55. [55]

    D. D. Joyce,Compact manifolds with special holonomy, Oxford Mathematical Monographs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000

    work page 2000

  56. [56]

    Gong,Classification of nilpotent Lie algebras of dimension 7 (over algebraically closed fields and R)

    M.-P. Gong,Classification of nilpotent Lie algebras of dimension 7 (over algebraically closed fields and R). ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1998

    work page 1998

  57. [57]

    Conti and M

    D. Conti and M. Fern´ andez,Nilmanifolds with a calibratedG 2-structure,Differential Geom. Appl.29(2011) 493

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    Bagaglini, M

    L. Bagaglini, M. Fern´ andez and A. Fino,CoclosedG 2-structures inducing nilsolitons,Forum Math.30(2018) 109

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Bazzoni, A

    G. Bazzoni, A. Garv´ ın and V. Mu˜ noz,Purely coclosedG2-structures on nilmanifolds,Math. Nachr.296(2023) 2236

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Bazzoni and A

    G. Bazzoni and A. Gil-Garc´ ıa,Moduli spaces of (co)closedG 2-structures on nilmanifolds,Q. J. Math.75(2024) 987

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Dibitetto, G

    G. Dibitetto, G. Lo Monaco, A. Passias, N. Petri and A. Tomasiello,AdS 3 Solutions with Exceptional Supersymmetry,Fortsch. Phys.66(2018) 1800060 [1807.06602]

    work page arXiv 2018

  62. [62]

    Passias and D

    A. Passias and D. Prins,On AdS 3 solutions of Type IIB,JHEP05(2020) 048 [1910.06326]

    work page arXiv 2020

  63. [63]

    Passias and D

    A. Passias and D. Prins,On supersymmetric AdS 3 solutions of Type II,JHEP08(2021) 168 [2011.00008]

    work page arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Emelin, F

    M. Emelin, F. Farakos and G. Tringas,Three-dimensional flux vacua from IIB on co-calibrated G2 orientifolds,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 456 [2103.03282]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    Scale-Separated AdS3 Vacua from G2-Orientifolds Using Bispinors,

    V. Van Hemelryck,Scale-Separated AdS3 Vacua from G2-Orientifolds Using Bispinors,Fortsch. Phys.70(2022) 2200128 [2207.14311]

    work page arXiv 2022

  66. [66]

    E. G. Gimon and J. Polchinski,Consistency conditions for orientifolds and D-manifolds,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 1667 [hep-th/9601038]

    work page arXiv 1996

  67. [67]

    Rajaguru, A

    M. Rajaguru, A. Sengupta and T. Wrase,Fully stabilized Minkowski vacua in the 2 6 Landau-Ginzburg model,JHEP10(2024) 095 [2407.16756]

    work page arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Rajaguru, A. Sengupta, J. Walcher and T. Wrase,Stabilizing massless fields with fluxes in Landau-Ginzburg models,JHEP08(2024) 069 [2406.03435]

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Becker, N

    K. Becker, N. Brady, M. Gra˜ na, M. Morros, A. Sengupta and Q. You,Tadpole conjecture in non-geometric backgrounds,JHEP10(2024) 021 [2407.16758]

    work page arXiv 2024

  70. [70]

    Cordova, T

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator,Multiplets of Superconformal Symmetry in Diverse Dimensions,JHEP03(2019) 163 [1612.00809]

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    A. R. Frey and J. Polchinski,N=3 warped compactifications,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 126009 [hep-th/0201029]

    work page arXiv 2002

  72. [72]

    Andriolo, G

    S. Andriolo, G. Shiu, H. Triendl, T. Van Riet, V. Venken and G. Zoccarato,Compact G2 holonomy spaces from SU(3) structures,JHEP03(2019) 059 [1811.00063]. – 41 –

    work page arXiv 2019