arxiv: 2605.07615 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Hydrodynamics and boundary-induced phase transitions in the n-species particle-exchange process

Gunter M. Schutz , Ali Zahra

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MP

keywords n-species particle exchangehydrodynamicsRiemann invariantsboundary-induced phase transitionsproduct measureexclusion processBurgers equations

0 comments

The pith

The n-species particle-exchange process admits Riemann invariants that solve its hydrodynamics explicitly and produce a 2n+1 phase diagram for generic boundary rates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the large-scale hydrodynamic limit of the n-species particle-exchange process, an exclusion model on a lattice where particles of n types swap with rates chosen to preserve a product-form invariant measure on the periodic torus. The resulting system of n coupled inviscid Burgers equations is shown to possess Riemann invariants for arbitrary n, which permit explicit construction of solutions to the Riemann problem in terms of shock waves and rarefaction fans. For the open system coupled to boundary reservoirs, a distinguished manifold of boundary rates is identified on which the invariant measure remains the same product measure, allowing the hydrodynamic description to determine the stationary phase diagram directly from the microscopic rates. In the generic case this yields 2n+1 phases separated by boundary-induced transitions analogous to those of the single-species asymmetric simple exclusion process.

Core claim

The system of conservation laws for the n-species process admits Riemann invariants for arbitrary n, from which explicit solutions of the Riemann problem are obtained in terms of shock waves and rarefaction fans. For a distinguished manifold of boundary rates in the open system the invariant measure is the same product measure as in the periodic case, and the hydrodynamic description in Riemann invariants yields the stationary phase diagram explicitly in terms of the boundary rates, exhibiting 2n+1 phases with boundary-induced transitions.

What carries the argument

Riemann invariants of the n coupled inviscid Burgers equations that arise from the hydrodynamic limit of the particle-exchange process, used to construct shock and rarefaction solutions and to map boundary rates onto stationary phases.

If this is right

The Riemann problem for arbitrary initial density profiles can be solved explicitly by combining shocks and rarefaction fans for any n.
On the distinguished manifold the open system has the same product-form stationary measure as the periodic system.
The stationary densities and currents are piecewise constant across 2n+1 phases whose boundaries are determined explicitly by the microscopic boundary rates.
Boundary-induced phase transitions occur at critical values of the boundary rates where the number or type of coexisting phases changes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The Riemann-invariant structure may allow similar explicit phase diagrams in other multi-species driven lattice gases that possess product measures.
The explicit mapping from boundary rates to macroscopic phases provides a direct way to predict steady-state behavior without solving the full stochastic dynamics.
The analogy with single-species ASEP suggests that higher-order observables such as current fluctuations or relaxation rates may also be accessible via the same invariants.

Load-bearing premise

The exchange rates are chosen so that the invariant measure on the periodic lattice is a product measure, and there exists a manifold of boundary rates that preserves this product measure for the open system.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation of the microscopic process for n=2 with chosen boundary rates, checking whether the measured stationary densities and currents match the values predicted by the Riemann-invariant phase diagram, would test the hydrodynamic description; mismatch in the locations of phase boundaries would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07615 by Ali Zahra, Gunter M. Schutz.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: The bulk dynamics of the n-species particle exchange process, illustrated for n = 3. The constraints in the box make the invariant measure a product measure. explored in [63] there is, however, a parameter manifold of such multispecies exclusion processes which have an invariant product measure. This family of processes is called the n-species particle exchange process (PEP(n)), defined formally below in (… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Phase diagram for z B k in the (z − k , z+ k )-plane at fixed Ck, with domain (fk−1, fk) 2 . The dashed diagonal separates rarefactions (above) from shocks (below). Solid black lines are the second-order transitions bounding the bulkinduced phase B(k) , and the brown line is the first-order coexistence line where the k-th shock is stationary. The dependence on the other Riemann variables enters only throu… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Bulk phase portrait for the open two-species PEP, illustrated for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The $n$-species particle-exchange process (PEP($n$)) is an exclusion process in which particles of $n$ different species exchange positions on neighbouring sites with rates chosen such that the invariant measure on the discrete torus is a product measure. We address the large-scale hydrodynamic behaviour of this process which yields a system of $n$ coupled inviscid Burgers equations. This system of conservation laws is shown to admit Riemann invariants for arbitrary $n$ from which explicit solutions of the Riemann problem in terms of shock waves and rarefaction fans are obtained. We also introduce the open PEP($n$), in which particles are exchanged with boundary reservoirs. For a distinguished manifold of boundary rates, we prove that the invariant measure is the same product measure as in the periodic system. The hydrodynamic description in terms of Riemann invariants is used to derive the stationary phase diagram explicitly in terms of microscopic boundary rates. In the generic case, the steady state exhibits $2n+1$ phases, with boundary-induced phase transitions analogous to those of the single-species asymmetric simple exclusion process.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows Riemann invariants exist for the n-species coupled Burgers system and uses them for an explicit 2n+1 phase diagram on a tuned boundary manifold, generalizing the ASEP case cleanly.

read the letter

The main advance is that the n-species PEP, with rates chosen for a product measure on the torus, has hydrodynamic equations that admit Riemann invariants for arbitrary n. This lets them solve the Riemann problem explicitly with shocks and rarefactions and then map the stationary phases for the open system, giving 2n+1 phases in terms of the boundary rates on a distinguished manifold. That is a concrete step beyond the single-species results they cite. They carry the logic over without obvious gaps in the abstract: the periodic product measure carries to the open case on that manifold, and the invariants turn the conservation laws into something solvable. The phase diagram construction looks direct once the invariants are in hand. The soft spot is whether the invariants really hold for every n. General n-component systems of conservation laws do not usually have a full set, so the specific flux here must have extra structure, perhaps from the product-measure condition. The abstract asserts it, but the proof will need to show it is not restricted to small n or special rate choices. The boundary manifold is also a limitation; outside it the invariant measure changes and the Riemann-invariant approach may not apply directly. This is for readers who already know the ASEP hydrodynamics and want the multi-species extension. It is precise enough to deserve a serious referee who can check the invariants derivation and the manifold condition. I would send it to review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the n-species particle-exchange process (PEP(n)), an exclusion process with rates chosen to yield a product invariant measure on the torus. It derives the hydrodynamic limit as a system of n coupled inviscid Burgers equations, proves the existence of Riemann invariants for arbitrary n, obtains explicit solutions to the Riemann problem via shocks and rarefactions, and for the open-boundary version with a distinguished manifold of reservoir rates, shows that the invariant measure remains the product measure. This hydrodynamic description is then used to construct the stationary phase diagram explicitly in terms of microscopic boundary rates, yielding 2n+1 phases with boundary-induced transitions analogous to the single-species ASEP.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a rare explicit hydrodynamic treatment and phase-diagram construction for a multi-species exclusion process with product measure, extending the well-understood ASEP case to arbitrary n via Riemann invariants. The proofs of the invariant measure for the open system and the explicit phase classification in terms of boundary rates constitute a concrete advance that could serve as a template for other boundary-driven systems admitting product measures.

major comments (2)

[§3 (Hydrodynamic limit and Riemann invariants)] The existence of a complete set of Riemann invariants for the n-dimensional system of conservation laws (abstract and §3) is load-bearing for the explicit Riemann-problem solutions and the subsequent 2n+1 phase classification. For a general quasilinear hyperbolic system the existence of such invariants is not automatic; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit invariants or the precise structural condition on the flux Jacobian that guarantees diagonalizability in Riemann coordinates for every n and every density vector in the simplex.
[§4 (Open system and invariant measure)] The proof that the open-boundary invariant measure coincides with the periodic product measure is restricted to a distinguished manifold of boundary rates (abstract and §4). The manuscript should clarify whether this manifold is of positive codimension and whether the hydrodynamic phase diagram remains valid only on that manifold or can be extended by continuity or perturbation arguments.

minor comments (2)

[§2] Notation for the n-species densities and the flux functions should be introduced with a single consistent table or equation block early in the text to avoid repeated re-definition when n is treated as a parameter.
[§5] The phase-diagram figures would benefit from explicit labeling of the 2n+1 regions in terms of the microscopic boundary rates rather than only in the hydrodynamic variables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and the encouraging assessment of our work. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify the points raised regarding the Riemann invariants and the open-boundary invariant measure. Our responses to the major comments are as follows.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3 (Hydrodynamic limit and Riemann invariants)] The existence of a complete set of Riemann invariants for the n-dimensional system of conservation laws (abstract and §3) is load-bearing for the explicit Riemann-problem solutions and the subsequent 2n+1 phase classification. For a general quasilinear hyperbolic system the existence of such invariants is not automatic; the manuscript must exhibit the explicit invariants or the precise structural condition on the flux Jacobian that guarantees diagonalizability in Riemann coordinates for every n and every density vector in the simplex.

Authors: We agree that the explicit construction is important for the claims. The manuscript in §3 proves the existence by providing the explicit Riemann invariants for the system of n coupled Burgers equations, which arise from the particular choice of exchange rates ensuring the product measure. These invariants allow the system to be written in diagonal form, enabling the explicit solution of the Riemann problem. The structural condition on the flux Jacobian is that it is strictly hyperbolic with a full set of left and right eigenvectors that can be integrated to yield the Riemann invariants, a property that holds for all n and all densities in the simplex due to the recursive structure of the multi-species fluxes. We will revise the text to highlight this condition and the explicit form of the invariants more clearly. revision: yes
Referee: [§4 (Open system and invariant measure)] The proof that the open-boundary invariant measure coincides with the periodic product measure is restricted to a distinguished manifold of boundary rates (abstract and §4). The manuscript should clarify whether this manifold is of positive codimension and whether the hydrodynamic phase diagram remains valid only on that manifold or can be extended by continuity or perturbation arguments.

Authors: The distinguished manifold is of positive codimension, specifically codimension n, as it imposes n conditions on the boundary rates (one for each species to match the product measure condition). The proof in §4 is indeed restricted to this manifold to ensure the boundary terms do not disturb the product structure. However, the hydrodynamic equations are derived from the bulk and are independent of the specific boundary rates. The phase diagram is obtained by applying the Riemann problem solutions with effective boundary densities determined by the reservoir rates. We will add a clarification in the revised manuscript stating that while the exact product invariant measure holds only on the manifold, the hydrodynamic phase classification provides the correct large-scale behavior and can be extended by continuity arguments to rates near the manifold, where the measure is a perturbation of the product measure. This will make the scope of the results explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows from model definition and standard hydrodynamic techniques

full rationale

The paper selects rates so the periodic system has a product invariant measure, which induces a specific hydrodynamic flux (n coupled inviscid Burgers equations) whose Jacobian structure permits Riemann invariants; this is a derived property shown from the conservation laws rather than assumed or fitted. The open-system analysis restricts to a distinguished boundary manifold where the same product measure holds, then applies the Riemann problem solutions to obtain the 2n+1-phase diagram explicitly in terms of boundary rates. No step reduces by construction to a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-citation chain, or a definitional tautology; the central claims rest on the explicit flux form and standard conservation-law methods without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the model definition that enforces a product invariant measure and on standard hydrodynamic-limit assumptions for exclusion processes; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

exchange rates
Rates are chosen by construction so that the invariant measure is a product measure; they are not fitted to external data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The invariant measure on the discrete torus is a product measure for the chosen rates.
Explicitly stated as the defining property of PEP(n).
domain assumption The large-scale hydrodynamic limit exists and is given by the system of inviscid Burgers equations.
Invoked to obtain the conservation laws whose Riemann problem is solved.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1606 out tokens · 64453 ms · 2026-05-11T02:46:42.240184+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AbsoluteFloorClosure.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

This system of conservation laws is shown to admit Riemann invariants for arbitrary n from which explicit solutions of the Riemann problem in terms of shock waves and rarefaction fans are obtained... the steady state exhibits 2n+1 phases
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the flux Jacobian J with matrix elements Jαβ = ∂jα/∂ρβ ... eigenvalues vα of J are the collective velocities

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

[1]

F. C. Alcaraz, S. Dasmahapatra, and V. Rittenberg, N-species stochastic models with boundaries and quadratic algebras, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31,845–878 (1998). 34

work page 1998
[2]

Phase transitions in the two-species totally asymmetric exclu- sion process with open boundaries

Arita, C. Phase transitions in the two-species totally asymmetric exclu- sion process with open boundaries. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. P12008, (2006)

work page 2006
[3]

Arratia, The motion of a tagged particle in the simple symmetric exclusion system in Z,Ann

R. Arratia, The motion of a tagged particle in the simple symmetric exclusion system in Z,Ann. Probab.11, 362–373 (1983)

work page 1983
[4]

Ayyer, A., Lebowitz, J. L. and Speer, E. R. On the two species asym- metric exclusion process with semi-permeable boundaries. J. Stat. Phys. 135, 1009–1037 (2009)

work page 2009
[5]

Ayyer, A., Lebowitz, J. L. and Speer, E. R. On some classes of open two- species exclusion processes. Markov Process. Related Fields 18, 157–176 (2012)

work page 2012
[6]

Ayyer and D

A. Ayyer and D. Roy, The exact phase diagram for a class of open multispecies asymmetric exclusion processes, Scientific Reports7, 13555 (2017)

work page 2017
[7]

Bahadoran, Hydrodynamics and Hydrostatics for a Class of Asym- metric Particle Systems with Open Boundaries, Commun

C. Bahadoran, Hydrodynamics and Hydrostatics for a Class of Asym- metric Particle Systems with Open Boundaries, Commun. Math. Phys. 310, 1 – 24 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

Barkema, C

G.T. Barkema, C. Caron, and J.F. Marko, Scaling properties of gel electrophoresis of DNA, Biopolymers38, 665–667 (1996)

work page 1996
[9]

Brzank and G.M

A. Brzank and G.M. Sch¨ utz, Phase Transition in the two-component symmetric exclusion process with open boundaries, J. Stat. Mech.2007, P08028 (2007)

work page 2007
[10]

and Prosen, T.: B

Buˇ ca, B. and Prosen, T.: B. Buˇ ca and T. Prosen, Connected correla- tions, fluctuations and current of magnetization in the steady state of boundary driven XXZ spin chains. J. Stat. Mech.2016, 023102 (2016)

work page 2016
[11]

and Wheeler, M

Cantini, L., Garbali, A., de Gier, J. and Wheeler, M. Koornwinder poly- nomials and the stationary multi-species asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries. J. Phys. A 49, 444002 (2016)

work page 2016
[12]

Cantini and A

L. Cantini and A. Zahra, Hydrodynamic behavior of the two-TASEP, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55305201 (2022). 35

work page 2022
[13]

Cantini and A

L. Cantini and A. Zahra, Steady-state selection in multi-species driven diffusive systems, EPL146, 21006 (2024)

work page 2024
[14]

Cantini and A

L. Cantini and A. Zahra, Single impurity in the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process, J. Stat. Mech.2025, 043204 (2025)

work page 2025
[15]

Carinci, C

G. Carinci, C. Giardin` a, C. Giberti, and F. Redig, Duality for Stochastic Models of Transport, J. Stat. Phys.152, 657–697 (2013)

work page 2013
[16]

Casini, R

F. Casini, R. Frassek, and C. Giardin` a, Duality for the multispecies stirring process with open boundaries, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.57, 295001 (2024)

work page 2024
[17]

Chen and C.M

G.-Q. Chen and C.M. Dafermos, The vanishing viscosity method in one- dimensional thermoelasticity, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.347, 531–541 (1995)

work page 1995
[18]

Chowdhury, A

D. Chowdhury, A. Schadschneider, K. Nishinari, Physics of collective transport and traffic phenomena in biology: Progress in 20 years, Physics of Life Reviews51, 409–422 (2024)

work page 2024
[19]

and Vanicat, M

Crampe, N., Mallick, K., Ragoucy, E. and Vanicat, M. Open two-species exclusion processes with integrable boundaries. J. Phys. A 48, 175002, (2015)

work page 2015
[20]

and Vanicat, M

Crampe, N., Evans, M., Mallick, K., Ragoucy, E. and Vanicat, M. Ma- trix product solution to a 2-species tasep with open integrable bound- aries. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08148 (2016)

work page arXiv 2016
[21]

and Vanicat, M

Crampe, N., Finn, C., Ragoucy, E. and Vanicat, M. Integrable boundary conditions for multi-species asep. J. Phys. A 49, 375201, (2016)

work page 2016
[22]

Derrida, M.R

B. Derrida, M.R. Evans, V. Hakim, and V. Pasquier, Exact solution of a 1D asymmetric exclusion model using a matrix formulation, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.26, 1493–1517 (1993)

work page 1993
[23]

Derrida, B., Janowsky, S.A., Lebowitz, J.L., Speer, E.R.: Exact solution of the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process: Shock profiles, J. Stat. Phys.73, 813–842 (1993). 36

work page 1993
[24]

Hydrodynamics of weakly deformed soliton lattices

Dubrovin BA, Novikov SP. Hydrodynamics of weakly deformed soliton lattices. Differential geometry and Hamiltonian theory. Russian Mathe- matical Surveys. 1989 Dec 31;44(6):35-124

work page 1989
[25]

Evans, Y

M.R. Evans, Y. Kafri, H.M. Koduvely, and D. Mukamel, Phase separa- tion and coarsening in one-dimensional driven diffusive systems: Local dynamics leading to long-range Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. E582764– 2778 (1998)

work page 1998
[26]

Ferrari and L.R.G

P.A. Ferrari and L.R.G. Fontes, Shock fluctuations in the asymmet- ric simple exclusion process. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields99, 305–319 (1994)

work page 1994
[27]

Ferrari, T

P.L. Ferrari, T. Sasamoto and H. Spohn, Coupled Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equations in one dimension, J. Stat. Phys.153, 377–399 (2013)

work page 2013
[28]

Floreani, A.G

S. Floreani, A.G. Casanova Non-equilibrium steady state of the sym- metric exclusion process with reservoirs, arXiv:2307.02481 [math.PR] (2023)

work page arXiv 2023
[29]

G¨ artner J.: Convergence towards Burgers’ equation and propagation of chaos for weakly asymmetric exclusion processes. Stoch. Proc. Appl.27, 233–260 (1988)

work page 1988
[30]

Giardin` a, J

C. Giardin` a, J. Kurchan, F. Redig, and K. Vafayi, Giardin` a, C., Kur- chan, J., Redig, F., and Vafayi, K.: Duality and Hidden Symmetries in Interacting Particle Systems, J. Stat. Phys.135, 25–55 (2009)

work page 2009
[31]

Grisi and G.M

R. Grisi and G.M. Sch¨ utz, Current symmetries for particle systems with several conservation laws, J. Stat. Phys.145, 1499–1512 (2011)

work page 2011
[32]

Großkinsky and H

S. Großkinsky and H. Spohn, Stationary measures and hydrodynamics of zero range processes with several species of particles, Bull. Braz. Math. Soc.34, 489–507 (2003)

work page 2003
[33]

J.S. Hager J. Krug, V. Popkov, and G.M. Sch¨ utz, Minimal current phase and universal boundary layers in driven diffusive systems Phys. Rev. E 63, 056110 (2001)

work page 2001
[34]

A. P. Isaev, P. N. Pyatov and V. Rittenberg, Diffusion algebras, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.34, 5815–5834 (2001). 37

work page 2001
[35]

Springer, Berlin (1999)

Kipnis, C., Landim, C.: Scaling limits of interacting particle systems. Springer, Berlin (1999)

work page 1999
[36]

J Krug, Boundary-induced phase transitions in driven diffusive systems. Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 1882–1885 (1991)

work page 1991
[37]

and K¨ arger, J.: NMR studies of single- file diffusion in unidimensional channel zeolites

Kukla, V., Kornatowski, J., Demuth, D., Girnus, I., Pfeifer, H., Rees, L.V.C., Schunk, S., Unger, K. and K¨ arger, J.: NMR studies of single- file diffusion in unidimensional channel zeolites. Science272702–704 (1996)

work page 1996
[38]

P. D. Lax, Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathe- matical Theory of Shock Waves, Vol. 11 (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1973)

work page 1973
[39]

P. D. Lax, Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equations, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 14 (AMS/Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York, 2000)

work page 2000
[40]

Springer, Berlin (1999)

Liggett, T.M.: Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Ex- clusion Processes. Springer, Berlin (1999)

work page 1999
[41]

Liggett, Continuous Time Markov Processes: An Introduction, Graduate Studies in Mathematics Vol

T.M. Liggett, Continuous Time Markov Processes: An Introduction, Graduate Studies in Mathematics Vol. 113, American Mathematical So- ciety, Rhode Island (2010)

work page 2010
[42]

Biopolymers6, 1–25 (1968)

MacDonald J.T., Gibbs J.H., and Pipkin A.C.: Kinetics of biopolymer- ization on nucleic acid templates. Biopolymers6, 1–25 (1968)

work page 1968
[43]

Perkins, D.E

T.T. Perkins, D.E. Smith, and S. Chu, Direct observation of tube-like motion of a single polymer-chain, Science264, 819–822 (1994)

work page 1994
[44]

Lett.48, 257–264 (1999)

Popkov V and Sch¨ utz G M Steady-state selection in driven diffusive systems with open boundaries, Europhys. Lett.48, 257–264 (1999)

work page 1999
[45]

Popkov, Infinite reflections of shock fronts in driven diffusive systems with two species J

V. Popkov, Infinite reflections of shock fronts in driven diffusive systems with two species J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.37, 1545–1557 (2004)

work page 2004
[46]

Popkov and G.M

V. Popkov and G.M. Sch¨ utz, Why spontaneous symmetry breaking dis- appears in a bridge system with PDE-friendly boundaries, J. Stat. Mech. 2004, P12004 (2004). 38

work page 2004
[47]

Popkov and M

V. Popkov and M. Salerno, Hierarchy of boundary-driven phase transi- tions in multispecies particle systems, Phys. Rev. E83, 011130 (2011)

work page 2011
[48]

Popkov and G

V. Popkov and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Unusual shock wave in two-species driven systems with an umbilic point, Phys. Rev. E86, 031139 (2012)

work page 2012
[49]

Popkov, D

V. Popkov, D. Karevski, and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Driven isotropic Heisenberg spin chain with arbitrary boundary twisting angle: exact results, Phys. Rev. E88, 062118 (2013)

work page 2013
[50]

Prosen, Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of a Strongly Driven Open XXZ Chain

T. Prosen, Exact Nonequilibrium Steady State of a Strongly Driven Open XXZ Chain. Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 137201 (2011)

work page 2011
[51]

Quastel, Diffusion of color in the simple exclusion process, Commun

J. Quastel, Diffusion of color in the simple exclusion process, Commun. Pure Appl. Math.45, 623–679 (1992)

work page 1992
[52]

R´ akos and G.M

A. R´ akos and G.M. Sch¨ utz, Exact shock measures and steady state selection in a driven diffusive system with two conserved densities, J. Stat. Phys.117, 55-76 (2004)

work page 2004
[53]

Rezakhanlou, Hydrodynamic limit for attractive particle systems on Zd, Commun

F. Rezakhanlou, Hydrodynamic limit for attractive particle systems on Zd, Commun. Math. Phys.140, 417–448 (1991)

work page 1991
[54]

Roy, The phase diagram for a class of multispecies permissive asym- metric exclusion processes, J

D. Roy, The phase diagram for a class of multispecies permissive asym- metric exclusion processes, J. Stat. Mech.2021, 013201 (2021)

work page 2021
[55]

D. Roy, A. Dhar, M. Kulkarni and H. Spohn, Fixed points and univer- sality classes in coupled Kardar–Parisi–Zhang equations, J. Stat. Mech. 2025, 073209 (2025)

work page 2025
[56]

Sandow, Partially asymmetric exclusion process with open bound- aries, Phys

S. Sandow, Partially asymmetric exclusion process with open bound- aries, Phys. Rev. E50, 2660–2667 (1994)

work page 1994
[57]

Sch¨ utz and E

G. Sch¨ utz and E. Domany, Phase transitions in an exactly soluble one- dimensional asymmetric exclusion model. J. Stat. Phys.72, 277–296 (1993)

work page 1993
[58]

Sch¨ utz, A reverse duality for the ASEP with open boundaries, J

G.M. Sch¨ utz, A reverse duality for the ASEP with open boundaries, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 274001 (2023)

work page 2023
[59]

L. S´ a, P. Ribeiro, T. Prosen and D. Bernard, Symmetry Classes of Clas- sical Stochastic Processes, J. Stat. Phys.192, 41 (2025). 39

work page 2025
[60]

Sch¨ utz, and S

G. Sch¨ utz, and S. Sandow,

work page
[61]

Sch¨ utz, Non-equilibrium relaxation law for entangled polymers, Europhys

G.M. Sch¨ utz, Non-equilibrium relaxation law for entangled polymers, Europhys. Lett.48, 623–628 (1999)

work page 1999
[62]

Sch¨ utz, Critical phenomena and universal dynamics in one- dimensional driven diffusive systems with two species of particles, J

G.M. Sch¨ utz, Critical phenomena and universal dynamics in one- dimensional driven diffusive systems with two species of particles, J. Phys. A36, R339 - R379 (2003)

work page 2003
[63]

Sch¨ utz and B

G.M. Sch¨ utz and B. Wehefritz–Kaufmann, Kardar-Parisi-Zhang modes in d-dimensional directed polymers, Physical Review E96, 032119 (2017)

work page 2017
[64]

Systems of Conservation Laws 2: Geometric Structures, Os- cillations, and Initial-Boundary Value Problems

Serre D. Systems of Conservation Laws 2: Geometric Structures, Os- cillations, and Initial-Boundary Value Problems. Cambridge University Press; 1999

work page 1999
[65]

Serre, Systems of Conservation Laws

D. Serre, Systems of Conservation Laws. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

work page 2000
[66]

Spitzer, Interaction of Markov processes, Adv

F. Spitzer, Interaction of Markov processes, Adv. Math.5, 246–290, (1970)

work page 1970
[67]

Spohn, Long-range correlations for stochastic lattice gases in a non- equilibrium steady state

H. Spohn, Long-range correlations for stochastic lattice gases in a non- equilibrium steady state. J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.16, 4275–4291 (1983)

work page 1983
[68]

Spohn, The Popkov-Sch¨ utz two-lane lattice gas: universality for gen- eral jump rates, J

H. Spohn, The Popkov-Sch¨ utz two-lane lattice gas: universality for gen- eral jump rates, J. Stat. Mech.2026, 023203 (2026)

work page 2026
[69]

T´ oth and B

B. T´ oth and B. Valk´ o, Onsager relations and Eulerian hydrodynamic limit for systems with several conservation laws, J. Stat. Phys.112, 497–521 (2003)

work page 2003
[70]

The geometry of Hamiltonian systems of hydrodynamic type

Tsarev SP. The geometry of Hamiltonian systems of hydrodynamic type. The generalized hodograph method. Mathematics of the USSR- Izvestiya. 1991 Apr 30;37(2):397-419

work page 1991
[71]

Two-species asymmetric simple exclusion process with open boundaries

Uchiyama, M. Two-species asymmetric simple exclusion process with open boundaries. Chaos Solitons Fractals 35, 398–407, (2008)

work page 2008
[72]

and Leiderer P.: Single-File diffusion of col- loids in one-dimensional channels

Wei, Q.-H., Bechinger, C. and Leiderer P.: Single-File diffusion of col- loids in one-dimensional channels. Science287, 625–627 (2000). 40

work page 2000
[73]

Yau, Relative entropy and hydrodynamics of Ginzburg–Landau models, Lett

H.-T. Yau, Relative entropy and hydrodynamics of Ginzburg–Landau models, Lett. Math. Phys.22, 63–80 (1991)

work page 1991
[74]

Zahra, Hydrodynamics of multi-species driven diffusive systems with open boundaries: a two-tasep study,arXiv preprintarXiv:2512.10108, 2025

A. Zahra, Hydrodynamics of multi-species driven diffusive systems with open boundaries: a two-tasep study,arXiv preprintarXiv:2512.10108, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[75]

Multi-species generalization of the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process

Zahra A. Multi-species generalization of the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04066. 2023. 41

work page arXiv 2023