pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07732 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quadratic Zeeman effect in light boron-like ions

V. A. Agababaev , A. V. Volotka , D. A. Glazov , A. V. Malyshev , M. M. Osiptsov , V. M. Shabaev
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 03:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph
keywords quadratic Zeeman effectboron-like ionshighly charged ionsQED correctionsself-energyg-factorfine-structure splittingFurry picture
0
0 comments X

The pith

Theoretical predictions for the quadratic Zeeman contribution to valence-electron binding energies are derived for boron-like ions with Z from 10 to 24.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper computes the quadratic Zeeman effect for the ground ^2P_{1/2} state of light boron-like ions across nuclear charges 10 to 24. Calculations proceed in the Furry picture using a pure Coulomb potential plus two screened potentials, with first-order one-photon exchange plus radiative corrections from self-energy and vacuum polarization included. The output is a set of numerical predictions for the quadratic Zeeman shift in the valence-electron binding energy. These numbers matter because they supply the theoretical reference needed to extract the pure magnetic-moment and fine-structure information from forthcoming high-precision experiments on highly charged ions.

Core claim

By treating the quadratic Zeeman shift as a first-order perturbation on top of the Furry-picture Dirac Hamiltonian, adding the one-photon-exchange correction and the dominant self-energy and Uehling vacuum-polarization terms, the authors obtain numerical values for the quadratic Zeeman contribution to the binding energy of the valence electron in the ^2P_{1/2} state for each ion from Z=10 to Z=24, using both core-Hartree and Kohn-Sham screening potentials as the zeroth-order approximation.

What carries the argument

First-order perturbation theory for the quadratic Zeeman operator in the Furry picture, augmented by one-photon-exchange and radiative corrections evaluated with effective screening potentials.

If this is right

  • The tabulated shifts supply the magnetic-field correction required to interpret g-factor measurements in boron-like highly charged ions.
  • The same shifts allow isolation of the pure fine-structure splitting from experimental data taken in external magnetic fields.
  • Comparison of results obtained with different screening potentials provides an internal estimate of the uncertainty arising from the modeling of electron-electron interaction.
  • The method supplies a concrete benchmark for future extensions to higher-order QED contributions or to other ionic states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the predictions agree with forthcoming measurements, the perturbative QED framework can be trusted for quadratic Zeeman shifts in mid-Z ions and can be scaled to neighboring charge states.
  • The same numerical machinery could be reused to estimate quadratic Zeeman corrections in isoelectronic sequences with different valence-electron configurations.
  • Discrepancies between the two screening potentials flag the leading source of theoretical uncertainty and suggest where higher-order many-body corrections should be computed next.

Load-bearing premise

That first-order perturbation theory in the one-photon exchange and radiative corrections, together with the core-Hartree and Kohn-Sham screening potentials, is sufficient to represent the many-electron interaction for the quadratic Zeeman shift.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of the g-factor or fine-structure interval in any boron-like ion in the Z=10-24 range whose extracted quadratic Zeeman shift differs from the calculated value by more than the stated theoretical uncertainty.

read the original abstract

The quadratic Zeeman effect is calculated for the ground $^2P_{1/2}$ state of light boron-like ions in the range of nuclear-charge numbers $Z = 10-24$. The calculations are performed in the Furry picture using three models for the zeroth-order approximation potential: pure nuclear Coulomb potential and two effective screening potentials $-$ core-Hartree and Kohn-Sham. First-order perturbation-theory contributions are considered: the one-photon-exchange correction and the radiative corrections associated with the self-energy and vacuum-polarization diagrams. The dominant contributions from the self-energy diagrams are calculated within a rigorous QED approach. The vacuum polarization corrections are obtained within the electric-loop approximation in the leading order, which is given by the Uehling potential. As a result, theoretical predictions for the contribution of the quadratic Zeeman effect to the binding energy of the valence electron in the $^2P_{1/2}$ state are obtained. The results can be used for the analysis of high-precision $g$-factor and fine-structure splitting measurements in boron-like highly charged ions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the quadratic Zeeman effect for the ground ^2P_{1/2} state of boron-like ions with nuclear charges Z=10-24. Calculations are performed in the Furry picture employing three zeroth-order potentials (pure Coulomb, core-Hartree, and Kohn-Sham). First-order perturbative corrections are evaluated, including the one-photon-exchange term, rigorous QED self-energy diagrams, and leading vacuum-polarization corrections via the Uehling potential. The resulting predictions quantify the quadratic Zeeman contribution to the valence-electron binding energy and are intended to support analysis of precision g-factor and fine-structure measurements.

Significance. If the numerical results hold, the work supplies timely theoretical input for ongoing high-precision experiments on highly charged ions in external magnetic fields. The use of multiple effective potentials permits an assessment of screening-model dependence, while the rigorous treatment of the self-energy diagrams represents a methodological strength. These predictions can directly inform the interpretation of magnetic-field-dependent shifts in atomic spectra.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that results are obtained but does not indicate the magnetic-field strength range over which the quadratic approximation remains valid; a brief statement in §1 or §2 would clarify the domain of applicability.
  2. Table captions and axis labels in the figures should explicitly note the units of the reported energy shifts (e.g., eV or a.u.) to avoid ambiguity for readers comparing with experimental data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work on the quadratic Zeeman effect in boron-like ions and for recommending minor revision. The report acknowledges the timeliness of the predictions for ongoing experiments and the methodological strengths of using multiple potentials and rigorous QED self-energy treatment. No specific major comments were provided in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper computes the quadratic Zeeman shift via first-order QED perturbation theory (one-photon exchange, self-energy, Uehling VP) in the Furry picture applied to Dirac solutions in Coulomb, core-Hartree, and Kohn-Sham potentials. All steps are standard, parameter-free applications of established QED methods to an external observable; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no self-definition equates input to output, and no load-bearing claim reduces to a prior self-citation. The numerical predictions are therefore independent of the target quantity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard QED in the Furry picture and first-order perturbation theory; the choice of effective screening potentials is a modeling assumption rather than a fitted parameter.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Furry picture with effective screening potential for the zeroth-order approximation
    Used to define the unperturbed states for perturbation theory in the presence of the nuclear field and electron screening.
  • domain assumption First-order perturbation theory suffices for one-photon exchange and radiative corrections
    Invoked for the quadratic Zeeman shift calculation without higher-order terms.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1457 out tokens · 52734 ms · 2026-05-11T03:30:16.182848+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The calculations are performed in the Furry picture using three models for the zeroth-order approximation potential: pure nuclear Coulomb potential and two effective screening potentials — core-Hartree and Kohn-Sham. First-order perturbation-theory contributions are considered: the one-photon-exchange correction and the radiative corrections associated with the self-energy and vacuum-polarization diagrams.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    A rigorous QED theory of the quadratic Zeeman effect can be formulated within the framework of the two-time Green’s function method [64].

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Morgner, B

    J. Morgner, B. Tu, C.M. K¨ onig, T. Sailer, F. Heiße, H. Bekker, B. Sikora, C. Lyu, V.A. Yerokhin, Z. Harman, J.R. Crespo L´ opez-Urrutia, C.H. Keitel, S. Sturm, K. Blaum. Nature,622, 53 (2023). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-06453-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06453-2 2023

  2. [2]

    Morgner, B

    J. Morgner, B. Tu, M. Moretti, C.M. K¨ onig, F. Heiße, T. Sailer, V.A. Yerokhin, B. Sikora, N.S. Ore- shkina, Z. Harman, C.H. Keitel, S. Sturm, K. Blaum. Phys. Rev. Lett.,134, 123201 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.123201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.123201 2025

  3. [3]

    Morgner, V.A

    J. Morgner, V.A. Yerokhin, C.M. K¨ onig, F. Heiße, B. Tu, T. Sailer, B. Sikora, Z. Har- man, J.R.C. L´ opez-Urrutia, C.H. Keitel, S. Sturm, K. Blaum. Science,388, 945 (2025), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adn5981. DOI: 10.1126/science.adn5981

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adn5981 2025

  4. [4]

    H¨ affner, T

    H. H¨ affner, T. Beier, N. Hermanspahn, H.J. Kluge, W. Quint, S. Stahl, J. Verd´ u, G. Werth. Phys. Rev. Lett.,85, 5308 (2000). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5308. 12

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.5308 2000

  5. [5]

    Verd´ u, S

    J. Verd´ u, S. Djeki´ c, S. Stahl, T. Valenzuela, M. Vogel, G. Werth, T. Beier, H.J. Kluge, W. Quint. Phys. Rev. Lett.,92, 093002 (2004). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.093002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.093002 2004

  6. [6]

    Sturm, A

    S. Sturm, A. Wagner, B. Schabinger, J. Zatorski, Z. Harman, W. Quint, G. Werth, C.H. Keitel, K. Blaum. Phys. Rev. Lett.,107, 023002 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.023002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.023002 2011

  7. [7]

    Sturm, A

    S. Sturm, A. Wagner, M. Kretzschmar, W. Quint, G. Werth, K. Blaum. Phys. Rev. A,87, 030501 (2013). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.87.030501

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.87.030501 2013

  8. [9]

    Arapoglou, A

    I. Arapoglou, A. Egl, M. H¨ ocker, T. Sailer, B. Tu, A. Weigel, R. Wolf, H. Cakir, V.A. Yerokhin, N.S. Oreshkina, V.A. Agababaev, A.V. Volotka, D.V. Zinenko, D.A. Glazov, Z. Harman, C.H. Keitel, S. Sturm, K. Blaum. Phys. Rev. Lett.,122, 253001 (2019). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.253001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.253001 2019

  9. [11]

    Heiße, M

    F. Heiße, M. Door, T. Sailer, P. Filianin, J. Herkenhoff, C.M. K¨ onig, K. Kromer, D. Lange, J. Morgner, A. Rischka, C. Schweiger, B. Tu, Y.N. Novikov, S. Eliseev, S. Sturm, K. Blaum. Phys. Rev. Lett.,131, 253002 (2023). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.253002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.131.253002 2023

  10. [12]

    Spieß, S

    L.J. Spieß, S. Chen, A. Wilzewski, M. Wehrheim, J. Gilles, A. Surzhykov, E. Benkler, M. Filzinger, M. Steinel, N. Huntemann, C. Cheung, S.G. Porsev, A.I. Bondarev, M.S. Safronova, J.R. Crespo L´ opez-Urrutia, P.O. Schmidt. Phys. Rev. Lett.,135, 043002 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/p88p-brnx

    work page doi:10.1103/p88p-brnx 2025

  11. [13]

    Sturm, F

    S. Sturm, F. K¨ ohler, J. Zatorski, A. Wagner, Z. Harman, G. Werth, W. Quint, C.H. Keitel, K. Blaum. Nature,506, 467 (2014). DOI: 10.1038/nature13026

    work page doi:10.1038/nature13026 2014

  12. [14]

    Mohr, D.B

    P.J. Mohr, D.B. Newell, B.N. Taylor, E. Tiesinga. Rev. Mod. Phys.,97, 025002 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.97.025002

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.97.025002 2025

  13. [15]

    Volotka, D.A

    A.V. Volotka, D.A. Glazov, V.M. Shabaev, I.I. Tupitsyn, G. Plunien. Phys. Rev. Lett.,112, 253004 (2014). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.253004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.253004 2014

  14. [16]

    K¨ ohler, K

    F. K¨ ohler, K. Blaum, M. Block, S. Chenmarev, S. Eliseev, D.A. Glazov, M. Goncharov, J. Hou, A. Kracke, D.A. Nesterenko, Y.N. Novikov, W. Quint, E. Minaya Ramirez, V.M. Shabaev, S. Sturm, A.V. Volotka, G. Werth. Nat. Commun.,7, 10246 (2016). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1138/1/012002. 13

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1138/1/012002 2016

  15. [17]

    Yerokhin, K

    V.A. Yerokhin, K. Pachucki, M. Puchalski, Z. Harman, C.H. Keitel. Phys. Rev. A,95, 062511 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.062511

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.95.062511 2017

  16. [18]

    Shabaev, D.A

    V.M. Shabaev, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Malyshev, I.I. Tupitsyn. Phys. Rev. Lett.,119, 263001 (2017). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.263001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.263001 2017

  17. [19]

    Shabaev, D.A

    V.M. Shabaev, D.A. Glazov, N.S. Oreshkina, A.V. Volotka, G. Plunien, H.J. Kluge, W. Quint. Phys. Rev. Lett.,96, 253002 (2006). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.253002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.253002 2006

  18. [21]

    Yerokhin, E

    V.A. Yerokhin, E. Berseneva, Z. Harman, I.I. Tupitsyn, C.H. Keitel. Phys. Rev. Lett.,116, 100801 (2016). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.022502

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.022502 2016

  19. [22]

    Quint, D.L

    W. Quint, D.L. Moskovkhin, V.M. Shabaev, M. Vogel. Phys. Rev. A,78, 032517 (2008). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.78.032517

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.78.032517 2008

  20. [23]

    Yerokhin, K

    V.A. Yerokhin, K. Pachucki, Z. Harman, C.H. Keitel. Phys. Rev. Lett.,107, 043004 (2011). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.043004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.043004 2011

  21. [24]

    Shabaev, D.A

    V.M. Shabaev, D.A. Glazov, A.M. Ryzhkov, C. Brandau, G. Plunien, W. Quint, A.M. Volchkova, D.V. Zinenko. Phys. Rev. Lett.,128, 043001 (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.043001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.043001 2022

  22. [25]

    Sailer, V

    T. Sailer, V. Debierre, Z. Harman, F. Heiße, C. K¨ onig, J. Morgner, B. Tu, A.V. Volotka, C.H. Keitel, K. Blaum, S. Sturm. Nature,606, 479 (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04807-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04807-w 2022

  23. [26]

    Debierre, C

    V. Debierre, C. Keitel, Z. Harman. Physics Letters B,807, 135527 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135527

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135527 2020

  24. [27]

    Debierre, N.S

    V. Debierre, N.S. Oreshkina, I.A. Valuev, Z. Harman, C.H. Keitel. Phys. Rev. A,106, 062801 (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.106.062801

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.106.062801 2022

  25. [28]

    Akulov, R.R

    D.S. Akulov, R.R. Abdullin, D.V. Chubukov, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka. Atoms,13(2025). DOI: 10.3390/atoms13060052

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms13060052 2025

  26. [29]

    Jenkins, E

    F.A. Jenkins, E. Segr` e. Phys. Rev.,55, 52 (1939). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.55.52

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.52 1939

  27. [30]

    Schiff, H

    L.I. Schiff, H. Snyder. Phys. Rev.,55, 59 (1939). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.55.59

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.55.59 1939

  28. [31]

    G.W. Preston. Astrophys. J.,160, L143 (1970). DOI: 10.1086/180547

    work page doi:10.1086/180547 1970

  29. [32]

    S.B. Kemic. Astrophysics and Space Science,36, 459 (1975). DOI: 10.1007/BF00645268

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00645268 1975

  30. [33]

    A., Ramsay, G., Andronov, I., et al

    C. Moran, T.R. Marsh, V.S. Dhillon. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society,299, 218 (1998). DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01763.x. 14

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01763.x 1998

  31. [34]

    Stenger, S

    J. Stenger, S. Inouye, D.M. Stamper-Kurn, H.J. Miesner, A.P. Chikkatur, W. Ketterle. Nature, 396, 345 (1998). DOI: 10.1038/24567

    work page doi:10.1038/24567 1998

  32. [35]

    Thilderkvist, M

    A. Thilderkvist, M. Kleverman, G. Grossmann, H. Grimmeiss. Phys. Rev. B,49, 14270 (1994). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14270

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.14270 1994

  33. [36]

    Garton, F.S

    W.R.S. Garton, F.S. Tomkins. Astrophys. J.,158, 839 (1969). DOI: 10.1086/150243

    work page doi:10.1086/150243 1969

  34. [37]

    Feinberg, A

    G. Feinberg, A. Rich, J. Sucher. Phys. Rev. A,41, 3478 (1990). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.3478

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.41.3478 1990

  35. [38]

    Raoult, S

    M. Raoult, S. Guizard, D. Gauyacq, A. Matzkin. Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics,38, S171 (2005). DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/38/2/013

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/2/013 2005

  36. [40]

    Zinenko, V.A

    D.V. Zinenko, V.A. Agababaev, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Malyshev, A.D. Moshkin, E.V. Tryapitsyna, A.V. Volotka. arXiv:2505.09567 [physics.atom-ph], (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  37. [43]

    Micke, T

    P. Micke, T. Leopold, S.A. King, E. Benkler, L.J. Spieß, L. Schm¨ oger, M. Schwarz, J.R. Crespo L´ opez-Urrutia, P.O. Schmidt. Nature,578, 60 (2020). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-1959-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1959-8 2020

  38. [44]

    King, L.J

    S.A. King, L.J. Spieß, P. Micke, A. Wilzewski, T. Leopold, E. Benkler, R. Lange, N. Huntemann, A. Surzhykov, V.A. Yerokhin, J.R. Crespo L´ opez-Urrutia, P.O. Schmidt. Nature,611, 43 (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05245-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05245-4 2022

  39. [45]

    Glazov, A.V

    D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka, A.A. Schepetnov, M.M. Sokolov, V.M. Shabaev, I.I. Tupitsyn, G. Plunien. Phys. Scr.,T156, 014014 (2013). DOI: 10.1088/0031-8949/2013/T156/014014

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2013/t156/014014 2013

  40. [46]

    Shchepetnov, D.A

    A.A. Shchepetnov, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka, V.M. Shabaev, I.I. Tupitsyn, G. Plunien. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.,583, 012001 (2015). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/583/1/012001

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/583/1/012001 2015

  41. [47]

    Cakir, V.A

    H. Cakir, V.A. Yerokhin, N.S. Oreshkina, B. Sikora, I.I. Tupitsyn, C.H. Keitel, Z. Harman. Phys. Rev. A,101, 062513 (2020). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.062513

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.062513 2020

  42. [48]

    Verdebout, C

    S. Verdebout, C. Naz´ e, P. J¨ onsson, P. Rynkun, M. Godefroid, G. Gaigalas. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables,100, 1111 (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2014.05.001. 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt.2014.05.001 2014

  43. [49]

    Marques, P

    J.P. Marques, P. Indelicato, F. Parente, J.M. Sampaio, J.P. Santos. Phys. Rev. A,94, 042504 (2016). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.042504

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.94.042504 2016

  44. [50]

    Agababaev, D.A

    V.A. Agababaev, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka, D.V. Zinenko, V.M. Shabaev, G. Plunien. J. Phys. Conf. Ser.,1138, 012003 (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1138/1/012003

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1138/1/012003 2018

  45. [51]

    Mazurek, M

    D.E. Maison, L.V. Skripnikov, D.A. Glazov. Phys. Rev. A,99, 042506 (2019). DOI: 10.1103/Phys- RevA.99.042506

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2019

  46. [52]

    Agababaev, D.A

    V.A. Agababaev, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka, D.V. Zinenko, V.M. Shabaev, G. Plunien. X-Ray Spectrometry,49, 143 (2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/xrs.3074

    work page doi:10.1002/xrs.3074 2020

  47. [53]

    Glazov, A.V

    D.A. Glazov, A.V. Malyshev, V.M. Shabaev, I.I. Tupitsyn. Opt. Spectrosc.,124, 457 (2018). DOI: 10.1134/S0030400X18040082

    work page doi:10.1134/s0030400x18040082 2018

  48. [54]

    Aleksandrov, D.A

    I.A. Aleksandrov, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Malyshev, V.M. Shabaev, I.I. Tupitsyn. Phys. Rev. A, 98, 062521 (2018). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.062521

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062521 2018

  49. [55]

    Malyshev, D.A

    A.V. Malyshev, D.A. Glazov, I.A. Aleksandrov, I.I. Tupitsyn, V.M. Shabaev. Optics and Spec- troscopy,128, 297 (2020). DOI: 10.1134/S0030400X20030145

    work page doi:10.1134/s0030400x20030145 2020

  50. [56]

    Glazov, A.V

    D.A. Glazov, A.V. Malyshev, V.M. Shabaev, I.I. Tupitsyn. Phys. Rev. A,101, 012515 (2020). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.101.012515

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.012515 2020

  51. [57]

    Glazov, D.V

    D.A. Glazov, D.V. Zinenko, V.A. Agababaev, A.D. Moshkin, E.V. Tryapitsyna, A.M. Volchkova, A.V. Volotka. Atoms,11(2023). DOI: 10.3390/atoms11090119

    work page doi:10.3390/atoms11090119 2023

  52. [58]

    Agababaev, A.M

    V.A. Agababaev, A.M. Volchkova, A.S. Varentsova, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka, V.M. Shabaev, G. Plunien. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B,408, 70 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.130

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2017.03.130 2017

  53. [59]

    Varentsova, V.A

    A.S. Varentsova, V.A. Agababaev, D.A. Glazov, A.M. Volchkova, A.V. Volotka, V.M. Shabaev, G. Plunien. Phys. Rev. A,97, 043402 (2018). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.043402

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.97.043402 2018

  54. [60]

    Agababaev, E.A

    V.A. Agababaev, E.A. Prokhorchuk, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Malyshev, V.M. Shabaev, A.V. Volotka. Phys. Rev. A,112, 032818 (2025). DOI: 10.1103/cpbv-l4z1

    work page doi:10.1103/cpbv-l4z1 2025

  55. [61]

    Varentsova, V.A

    A.S. Varentsova, V.A. Agababaev, A.M. Volchkova, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka, V.M. Shabaev, G. Plunien. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B,408, 80 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.05.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2017.05.040 2017

  56. [62]

    Volchkova, A

    A. Volchkova, A. Varentsova, N. Zubova, V. Agababaev, D. Glazov, A. Volotka, V. Shabaev, G. Plu- nien. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B,408, 89 (2017). DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2017.04.086. 16

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2017.04.086 2017

  57. [63]

    Volchkova, V.A

    A.M. Volchkova, V.A. Agababaev, D.A. Glazov, A.V. Volotka, S. Fritzsche, V.M. Shabaev, G. Plu- nien. Helium-like ions in magnetic field: application of the nonperturbative relativistic method for axially symmetric systems, 2020

    work page 2020

  58. [64]

    V.M. Shabaev. Phys. Rep.,356, 119 (2002). DOI: 10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00024-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(01)00024-2 2002

  59. [65]

    Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects.Physical Review, 140(4A):A1133–A1138, 1965

    W. Kohn, L.J. Sham. Phys. Rev.,140, A1133 (1965). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 1965

  60. [66]

    Moskovkin, V.M

    D.L. Moskovkin, V.M. Shabaev, W. Quint. Optics and Spectroscopy,104, 637 (2008). DOI: 10.1134/S0030400X08050019

    work page doi:10.1134/s0030400x08050019 2008

  61. [67]

    Grotch, R.A

    H. Grotch, R.A. Hegstrom. Phys. Rev. A,4, 59 (1971). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.4.59

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.4.59 1971

  62. [68]

    Hegstrom

    R.A. Hegstrom. Phys. Rev. A,7, 451 (1973). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.11.421

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.11.421 1973

  63. [69]

    Glazov, V.M

    D.A. Glazov, V.M. Shabaev, I.I. Tupitsyn, A.V. Volotka, V.A. Yerokhin, G. Plunien, G. Soff. Phys. Rev. A,70, 062104 (2004). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.70.062104

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.70.062104 2004

  64. [70]

    V.M. Shabaev. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.,24, 4479 (1991). DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/24/21/004. 17 A B C D E × F × Fig.1. One-photon-exchange corrections to the quadratic Zeeman effect. The double line denotes the electron propagator in the fieldV nuc (orV nuc +V scr), the wavy line denotes the photon propagator, the dashed line ending with a triangle de...

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-4075/24/21/004 1991