pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07826 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ⚛️ nucl-th · hep-ph· nucl-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Hadronic parity violation: successes, challenges, and future prospects

Susan Gardner , Jonas Karthein , Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner , Girish Muralidhara , Petr Navratil , W. Michael Snow
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th hep-phnucl-ex
keywords hadronic parity violationfew-nucleon systemsnuclear parity violationStandard Model testsbeyond Standard Model searcheslow-energy nuclear physicsweak interactionstrong interaction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Precision studies of parity violation in few-nucleon systems can extend to complex nuclei to benchmark the Standard Model and search for new physics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper lays out how the weak and strong forces together produce small parity-violating effects in hadrons and nuclei at low energies. It reviews what is already understood from simple systems and shows how those results open a route to more complicated nuclei. A sympathetic reader would care because such extensions would give new ways to test whether the Standard Model fully accounts for nuclear behavior and to look for hints of forces outside it.

Core claim

Hadronic parity violation arises from the combined action of weak and strong interactions that produce observable parity-violating effects in systems of hadrons and nuclei at low energies. Current theoretical and experimental progress in few-nucleon systems is now mature enough to support systematic extension to heavier nuclei. Those extensions would supply new precision benchmarks for Standard Model calculations and fresh opportunities to detect dynamics beyond the Standard Model.

What carries the argument

The interplay between weak and strong interactions that produces low-energy parity-violating observables in few-nucleon systems, which the paper treats as a bridge to calculations in complex nuclei.

If this is right

  • New precision benchmarks become available for Standard Model computations in nuclei of moderate size.
  • Searches for dynamics beyond the Standard Model gain additional experimental channels in nuclear systems.
  • Theoretical methods tested in few-nucleon parity violation can be applied to other low-energy nuclear observables.
  • Experimental programs can shift focus from isolated nucleon-nucleon studies toward heavier targets while retaining predictive power.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the extension succeeds, parity-violating observables could become a standard tool alongside beta decay for constraining nuclear forces at the few-percent level.
  • Discrepancies uncovered in complex nuclei might point back to missing pieces in the few-nucleon description rather than to new physics.
  • The same framework could be used to reinterpret existing nuclear data sets for consistency checks without new experiments.

Load-bearing premise

Current theoretical frameworks and experimental techniques developed for few-nucleon systems are accurate enough to support reliable extensions to complex nuclei and to searches for new physics.

What would settle it

A measured parity-violating observable in a complex nucleus that deviates from predictions based on few-nucleon inputs by an amount larger than estimated uncertainties would show the extension does not work as assumed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07826 by Girish Muralidhara, Jonas Karthein, Petr Navratil, Susan Gardner, Ulf-G. Mei{\ss}ner, W. Michael Snow.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic energy ladder for the theoretical description of hadronic parity violation, showing how its dynamical content evolves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Leading order QCD corrections to 2 → 2 weak processes. Curly lines represent gluon dressings to tree-level W± /Z 0 boson mediated weak interactions, which are represented by wavy lines. To address these challenges, Desplanques, Donoghue, and Holstein (DDH) [15] introduced a phenomenological NN interaction model based on single-meson exchange to describe hadronic parity violation. In this framework, parity-… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Different constraints on the coupling constants hρ−ω and h 1 π are compiled and compared. The vertical band bounded by a solid line is the value h 1 π = (2.6 ± 1.2) × 10−7 , as measured in the parity-violating asymmetry in ⃗n + p → d + γ [17]. Its determination in chiral perturbation theory, h 1 π = (2.7 ± 1.8) × 10−7 , is shown as the vertical band bounded by a dotted line [51, 52]. The diagonal constrain… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Chiral expansion of the PV NN force up to N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Diagrams contributing to atomic parity violation. (a) Nuclear-spin-independent (NSI) contribution from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Coupling constant κax= I κZ for 19F (I=1/2) calculated within NCSM. Good convergence is found with respect to the basis size characterized by Nmax and the harmonic oscillator frequency ℏΩ shown in the legend. The chiral NN+3N interaction and wave functions are as described in [131]. contributions from the two processes. The same was found in 19F calculations using wave functions from [131]. Anapole moments… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Hadronic parity violation concerns the study of the interplay of the weak- and strong-interaction dynamics that yields low energy, parity-violating observables in systems of hadrons and nuclei. We explain its essential features, as well as our current understanding of its observed effects, describing recent theoretical and experimental progress in a pedagogical context. We provide a broad overview of ongoing research efforts to show how precision studies of few-nucleon systems can be extended to studies of complex nuclei and, ultimately, to new benchmarks for computations in the Standard Model, as well as to new searches for the dynamics beyond it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a pedagogical review of hadronic parity violation. It explains the essential features arising from the interplay of weak and strong interactions in low-energy parity-violating observables in hadrons and nuclei, summarizes the current theoretical and experimental understanding along with recent progress, and outlines ongoing efforts to extend precision studies of few-nucleon systems to complex nuclei. The ultimate goal is to establish new benchmarks for Standard Model computations and to enable searches for physics beyond the Standard Model.

Significance. As a review that consolidates successes, challenges, and future prospects in the field, the paper would be significant for guiding research in nuclear theory and experiment. It correctly identifies the extension from few-body precision work to many-body systems as a key step toward SM tests and BSM searches, providing a useful synthesis for both specialists and newcomers.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the central prospective claim clearly but does not list the specific recent theoretical frameworks or experiments that are discussed in the body; adding one or two concrete examples would improve reader orientation without lengthening the abstract.
  2. [Section on future prospects] Ensure that the discussion of ongoing efforts includes explicit references to the most recent few-nucleon calculations (e.g., those using chiral EFT or lattice QCD) so that the claimed extension to complex nuclei is tied to verifiable benchmarks.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript as a pedagogical review that consolidates the current state of hadronic parity violation research. We appreciate the recognition of its significance for guiding future work in nuclear theory and experiment, as well as the recommendation to accept.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review overview with no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

This is a review article summarizing essential features, current understanding, recent progress, and ongoing efforts in hadronic parity violation. It presents no new derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or load-bearing claims that reduce to self-citations or inputs by construction. The central prospective claim about extending few-nucleon studies is framed as an overview of external literature rather than an internal derivation chain. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or uniqueness-imported steps exist, making the paper self-contained against external benchmarks with no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the central content rests on the existing body of literature in nuclear theory and experiment rather than new axioms, free parameters, or invented entities introduced here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5416 in / 952 out tokens · 39311 ms · 2026-05-11T01:59:42.479982+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

203 extracted references · 203 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    V. M. Lobashov, V. A. Nazarenko, L. F . Saenko, L. M. Smotritsky, G. I. Kharkevitch, Parity non-conservation in the gamma decay of 181 Ta, Phys. Lett. B 25 (1967) 104–106.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(67)90191-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(67)90191-8 1967

  2. [2]

    O. P . Sushkov, V. V. Flambaum, Parity Breaking In The Interaction Of Neutrons With Heavy Nuclei, Sov. Phys. Usp. 25 (1982) 1–12

    work page 1982

  3. [3]

    C. M. Frankle, et al., Parity nonconservation for neutron resonances in Th-232, Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992) 778–787.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 46.778

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc 1992

  4. [4]

    G. E. Mitchell, J. D. Bowman, H. A. Weidenmuller, Parity violation in the compound nucleus, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71 (1999) 445–457. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.71.445

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.71.445 1999

  5. [5]

    I. B. Zel’dovich, Electromagnetic Interaction with Parity Violation, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 6 (1958) 1184

    work page 1958

  6. [6]

    C. S. Wood, S. C. Bennett, D. Cho, B. P . Masterson, J. L. Roberts, C. E. Tanner, C. E. Wieman, Measurement of parity nonconservation and an anapole moment in cesium, Science 275 (5307) (1997) 1759–1763.doi:10.1126/science.275.5307.1759. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5307.1759

    work page doi:10.1126/science.275.5307.1759 1997

  7. [8]

    Gardner, W

    S. Gardner, W. C. Haxton, B. R. Holstein, A New Paradigm for Hadronic Parity Nonconservation and its Experimental Implications, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 67 (2017) 69–95.arXiv:1704.02617,doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-041917-033231 2017

  8. [9]

    P . D. Eversheim, et al., Parity violation in proton proton scattering at 13.6-MeV, Phys. Lett. B 256 (1991) 11–14.doi:10.1016/ 0370-2693(91)90209-9

    work page 1991

  9. [10]

    Kistryn, et al., Precision Measurement of Parity Violation in Proton Proton Scattering at 45-MeV, Phys

    S. Kistryn, et al., Precision Measurement of Parity Violation in Proton Proton Scattering at 45-MeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 1616. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.58.1616

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.58.1616 1987

  10. [11]

    E. G. Adelberger, W. C. Haxton, Parity nonconservation in thenninteraction, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 35 (1) (1985) 501–558.doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.35.120185.002441. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.35.120185.002441

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.35.120185.002441 1985

  11. [13]

    W. C. Haxton, C.-P . Liu, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Anapole moment and other constraints on the strangeness conserving hadronic weak interaction, Physical Review Letters 86 (23) (2001) 5247–5250.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5247. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5247

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5247 2001

  12. [14]

    W. C. Haxton, C.-P . Liu, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, Nuclear anapole moments, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 045502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65. 045502. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.045502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.65 2002

  13. [15]

    Desplanques, J

    B. Desplanques, J. F . Donoghue, B. R. Holstein, Unified treatment of the parity violating nuclear force, Annals of Physics 124 (2) (1980) 449–495.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(80)90217-1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(80)90217-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(80)90217-1 1980

  14. [16]

    S.-L. Zhu, C. Maekawa, B. Holstein, M. Ramsey-Musolf, U. van Kolck, Nuclear parity violation in effective field theory, Nuclear Physics A 748 (3) (2005) 435–498.doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.032. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2004.10.032 2005

  15. [18]

    M. T. Gericke, S. Baeßler, L. Barr ´on-Palos, N. Birge, J. D. Bowman, J. Calarco, V. Cianciolo, C. E. Coppola, C. B. Crawford, N. Fomin, I. Garishvili, G. L. Greene, G. M. Hale, J. Hamblen, C. Hayes, E. Iverson, M. L. Kabir, M. McCrea, E. Plemons, A. Ram´ırez-Morales, P . E. Mueller, I. Novikov, S. Penttila, E. M. Scott, J. Watts, C. Wickersham, First pre...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.131803 2020

  16. [19]

    Abele, et al., Fundamental Nuclear and Particle Physics At Neutron Sources (6 2025).arXiv:2506.22682

    H. Abele, et al., Fundamental Nuclear and Particle Physics At Neutron Sources (6 2025).arXiv:2506.22682

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [20]

    Gardner, G

    S. Gardner, G. Muralidhara, QCD analysis of∆S=0hadronic parity violation, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137372.arXiv:2203.00033, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137372

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137372 2022

  18. [21]

    Gardner, G

    S. Gardner, G. Muralidhara, Toward a unified treatment of∆S=0parity violation in low-energy nuclear processes, Phys. Rev. C 107 (5) (2023) 055501.arXiv:2210.03567,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.107.055501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.055501 2023

  19. [22]

    Muralidhara, S

    G. Muralidhara, S. Gardner,∆S=0hadronic parity violation in next-to-leading order QCD: Anomalous dimension matrices and their implications, Phys. Lett. B 849 (2024) 138428.arXiv:2311.05086,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138428

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138428 2024

  20. [23]

    Viviani, A

    M. Viviani, A. Baroni, L. Girlanda, A. Kievsky, L. E. Marcucci, R. Schiavilla, Chiral effective field theory analysis of hadronic parity violation in few-nucleon systems, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 064004.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.89.064004. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.064004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.89.064004 2014

  21. [24]

    Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell: Second Edition, Princeton University Press, 2010

    A. Zee, Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell: Second Edition, Princeton University Press, 2010

    work page 2010

  22. [25]

    A. J. Buras, Weak Hamiltonian, CP violation and rare decays, in: Les Houches Summer School in Theoretical Physics, Session 68: Probing the Standard Model of Particle Interactions, 1998, pp. 281–539.arXiv:hep-ph/9806471

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  23. [26]

    Buchalla, A

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras, M. E. Lautenbacher, Weak decays beyond leading logarithms, Reviews of Modern Physics 68 (4) (1996) 1125– 1244.doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.1125. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1103%2Frevmodphys.68.1125

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.1125 1996

  24. [27]

    W. A. Bardeen, A. J. Buras, J. M. Gerard, A Consistent Analysis of the∆I= 1/2 Rule for K Decays, Phys. Lett. B 192 (1987) 138–144. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91156-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(87)91156-7 1987

  25. [28]

    Bijnens, J

    J. Bijnens, J. Prades, The Delta I = 1/2 rule in the chiral limit, JHEP 01 (1999) 023.arXiv:hep-ph/9811472,doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 1999/01/023

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/ 1999

  26. [29]

    A. J. Buras, J.-M. G ´erard, W. A. Bardeen, LargeNApproach to Kaon Decays and Mixing 28 Y ears Later:∆I=1/2Rule, ˆBK and∆M K, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2871.arXiv:1401.1385,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2871-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2871-x 2014

  27. [30]

    ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions, Nucl. Phys. B 72 (1974) 461.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90154-0 1974

  28. [31]

    ’t Hooft, A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons, Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft, A Two-Dimensional Model for Mesons, Nucl. Phys. B 75 (1974) 461–470.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90088-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(74)90088-1 1974

  29. [32]

    Witten, Baryons in the 1/n Expansion, Nucl

    E. Witten, Baryons in the 1/n Expansion, Nucl. Phys. B 160 (1979) 57–115.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90232-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(79)90232-3 1979

  30. [33]

    M. E. Peskin, D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory, Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995.doi:10.1201/ 9780429503559

    work page 1995

  31. [34]

    Fermi, An attempt of a theory of beta radiation

    E. Fermi, An attempt of a theory of beta radiation. 1., Z. Phys. 88 (1934) 161–177.doi:10.1007/BF01351864

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01351864 1934

  32. [35]

    R. P . Feynman, M. Gell-Mann, Theory of the fermi interaction, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 193–198.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.109.193. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.109.193

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.109.193 1958

  33. [36]

    E. C. G. Sudarshan, R. e. Marshak, Chirality invariance and the universal Fermi interaction, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958) 1860–1860.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.109.1860.2

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.109.1860.2 1958

  34. [37]

    Kobach, Baryon Number, Lepton Number, and Operator Dimension in the Standard Model, Phys

    A. Kobach, Baryon Number, Lepton Number, and Operator Dimension in the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 758 (2016) 455–457.arXiv: 1604.05726,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.050

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2016.05.050 2016

  35. [38]

    Kobayashi, T

    M. Kobayashi, T. Maskawa, CP Violation in the Renormalizable Theory of Weak Interaction, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49 (1973) 652–657. doi:10.1143/PTP.49.652

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.49.652 1973

  36. [39]

    Gasser, H

    J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop, Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2 1984

  37. [40]

    Gasser, H

    J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory: Expansions in the Mass of the Strange Quark, Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 465–516. doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90492-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90492-4 1985

  38. [41]

    ’t Hooft, Large N, in: The Phenomenology of Large N(c) QCD, 2002, pp

    G. ’t Hooft, Large N, in: The Phenomenology of Large N(c) QCD, 2002, pp. 3–18.arXiv:hep-th/0204069,doi:10.1142/9789812776914_ 0001

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812776914_ 2002

  39. [42]

    J. Dai, M. J. Savage, J. Liu, R. P . Springer, Low-energy effective Hamiltonian for Delta I = 1 nuclear parity violation and nucleonic strangeness, Phys. Lett. B 271 (1991) 403–409.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90108-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(91)90108-3 1991

  40. [43]

    D. B. Kaplan, M. J. Savage, An Analysis of parity violating pion - nucleon couplings, Nucl. Phys. A 556 (1993) 653–671, [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.A 570, 833–833 (1994), Erratum: Nucl.Phys.A 580, 679–679 (1994)].doi:10.1016/0375-9474(93)90475-D

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(93)90475-d 1993

  41. [44]

    Review of particle physics

    S. Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  42. [45]

    G. L. Muralidhara, QCD Analysis of Flavor-nonchanging Hadronic Weak Processes Through Next-to-leading Order, Ph.D. thesis, Kentucky U. (2024).doi:10.13023/etd.2024.56

    work page doi:10.13023/etd.2024.56 2024

  43. [46]

    Fleischer, N

    R. Fleischer, N. Serra, N. Tuning, Tests of Factorization and SU(3) Relations in B Decays into Heavy-Light Final States, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 014017.arXiv:1012.2784,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.014017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.014017 2011

  44. [47]

    Gupta, Y .-C

    R. Gupta, Y .-C. Jang, B. Y oon, H.-W. Lin, V. Cirigliano, T. Bhattacharya, Isovector Charges of the Nucleon from 2+1+1-flavor Lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 034503.arXiv:1806.09006,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.034503. 24Hadronic parity violation: successes, challenges, and future prospects

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.034503 2018

  45. [48]

    Hashimoto, S

    Y . Aoki, et al., FLAG Review 2021 (11 2021).arXiv:2111.09849

    work page arXiv 2021

  46. [49]

    D. R. Phillips, D. Samart, C. Schat, Parity-Violating Nucleon-Nucleon Force in the 1/Nc Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (6) (2015) 062301. arXiv:1410.1157,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.062301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.062301 2015

  47. [50]

    M. R. Schindler, R. P . Springer, J. Vanasse, Large-N c limit reduces the number of independent few-body parity-violating low-energy constants in pionless effective field theory, Phys. Rev. C 93 (2) (2016) 025502, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 97, 059901 (2018)].arXiv: 1510.07598,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.025502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.93.025502 2016

  48. [51]

    de Vries, N

    J. de Vries, N. Li, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nogga, E. Epelbaum, N. Kaiser, Parity violation in neutron capture on the proton: Determining the weak pion–nucleon coupling, Phys. Lett. B 747 (2015) 299–304.arXiv:1501.01832,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.05.074

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2015.05.074 2015

  49. [52]

    de Vries, E

    J. de Vries, E. Epelbaum, L. Girlanda, A. Gnech, E. Mereghetti, M. Viviani, Parity- and Time-Reversal-Violating Nuclear Forces, Front. in Phys. 8 (2020) 218.arXiv:2001.09050,doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00218

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00218 2020

  50. [53]

    M. R. Schindler, H. Singh, R. P . Springer, Large-Nc Relationships Among Two-Derivative Pionless Effective Field Theory Couplings, Phys. Rev. C 98 (4) (2018) 044001.arXiv:1805.06056,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.044001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.044001 2018

  51. [54]

    Greenacre, P

    M. Greenacre, P . Groenen, T. Hastie, A. Iodice D’Enza, A. Markos, E. Tuzhilina, Principal component analysis, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2 (2022) 100, [Erratum: Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 3, 22 (2023)].doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00184-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s43586-022-00184-w 2022

  52. [55]

    Carlson, R

    J. Carlson, R. Schiavilla, V. R. Brown, B. F . Gibson, Parity-violating interaction effects: The longitudinal asymmetry inppelastic scattering, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 035502.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.035502. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.035502

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.65.035502 2002

  53. [56]

    M. S. Safronova, D. Budker, D. DeMille, D. F . J. Kimball, A. Derevianko, C. W. Clark, Search for new physics with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (2018) 025008.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025008. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025008

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.025008 2018

  54. [57]

    Aoki, et al., FLAG review 2024, Phys

    Y . Aoki, et al., FLAG review 2024, Phys. Rev. D 113 (1) (2026) 014508.arXiv:2411.04268,doi:10.1103/nfzp-p5dn

    work page doi:10.1103/nfzp-p5dn 2024

  55. [58]

    Wasem, Lattice QCD Calculation of Nuclear Parity Violation, Phys

    J. Wasem, Lattice QCD Calculation of Nuclear Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 022501.arXiv:1108.1151,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevC.85.022501

    work page arXiv 2012

  56. [59]

    Feng, F .-K

    X. Feng, F .-K. Guo, C.-Y . Seng, Novel Soft-Pion Theorem for Long-Range Nuclear Parity Violation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (18) (2018) 181801.arXiv:1711.09342,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.181801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.181801 2018

  57. [60]

    Guo, C.-Y

    F .-K. Guo, C.-Y . Seng, Effective Field Theory in The Study of Long Range Nuclear Parity Violation on Lattice, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (1) (2019) 22.arXiv:1809.00639,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6529-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6529-y 2019

  58. [61]

    Petschlies, N

    M. Petschlies, N. Schlage, A. Sen, C. Urbach, Exploring a new approach to hadronic parity violation from lattice QCD, Eur. Phys. J. A 60 (1) (2024) 9.arXiv:2306.03211,doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01208-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01208-z 2024

  59. [62]

    Kurth, E

    T. Kurth, E. Berkowitz, E. Rinaldi, P . Vranas, A. Nicholson, M. Strother, A. Walker-Loud, E. Rinaldi, Nuclear Parity Violation from Lattice QCD, PoS LATTICE2015 (2016) 329.arXiv:1511.02260,doi:10.22323/1.251.0329

    work page doi:10.22323/1.251.0329 2016

  60. [63]

    Walker-Loud, Talk at int workshop 19r-76hadronic parity nonconservation ii, 24-27 jan, 2022 (2022)

    A. Walker-Loud, Talk at int workshop 19r-76hadronic parity nonconservation ii, 24-27 jan, 2022 (2022). URLhttps://archive.int.washington.edu/talks/WorkShops/int_19R_76/People/Walker-Loud_A/Walker-Loud.pdf

    work page 2022

  61. [64]

    Bulava, et al., Di-nucleons do not form bound states at heavy pion mass, Phys

    J. Bulava, et al., Di-nucleons do not form bound states at heavy pion mass, Phys. Rev. C 113 (2) (2026) 024002.arXiv:2505.05547, doi:10.1103/d2hg-h6d4

    work page doi:10.1103/d2hg-h6d4 2026

  62. [65]

    Moscoso, F

    J. Moscoso, F . G. Ortega-Gama, R. A. Brice ˜no, A. W. Jackura, C. Kacir, A. N. Nicholson, Resolving the structure of bound states using lattice quantum field theories (2 2026).arXiv:2602.20373

    work page arXiv 2026

  63. [66]

    Meißner, A

    U.-G. Meißner, A. Rusetsky, Effective Field Theories, Cambridge University Press, 2022.doi:10.1017/9781108689038

    work page doi:10.1017/9781108689038 2022

  64. [67]

    B. R. Holstein, Hadronic parity violation and effective field theory, Eur. Phys. J. A 41 (2009) 279–298.doi:10.1140/epja/i2009-10798-1

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2009-10798-1 2009

  65. [68]

    & Meißner, U.-G

    J. de Vries, U.-G. Meißner, Violations of discrete space–time symmetries in chiral effective field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 25 (05) (2016) 1641008.arXiv:1509.07331,doi:10.1142/S0218301316410081

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301316410081 2016

  66. [69]

    M. R. Schindler, R. P . Springer, The theory of parity violation in few-nucleon systems, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 72 (2013) 1–43.doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.05.002. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.05.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2013.05.002 2013

  67. [70]

    S. T. Nguyen, M. R. Schindler, R. P . Springer, J. Vanasse, Large-Nc and renormalization group constraints on parity-violating low-energy coefficients for three-derivative operators in pionless effective field theory, Phys. Rev. C 103 (5) (2021) 054004.arXiv:2012.02180, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.103.054004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.054004 2021

  68. [71]

    B. C. Tiburzi, Hadronic Parity Violation at Next-to-Leading Order, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 054020.arXiv:1201.4852,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.85.054020

    work page arXiv 2012

  69. [72]

    Barton, Notes on the static parity nonconserving internucleon potential, Nuovo Cim

    G. Barton, Notes on the static parity nonconserving internucleon potential, Nuovo Cim. 19 (1961) 512–527.doi:10.1007/BF02733247

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02733247 1961

  70. [73]

    Kaiser, U.-G

    N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, Theoretical Aspects of Nuclear Parity Violation, Nucl. Phys. A 510 (1990) 759–773.doi:10.1016/ 0375-9474(90)90359-T

    work page 1990

  71. [74]

    Meißner, H

    U.-G. Meißner, H. Weigel, The Parity violating pion nucleon coupling constant from a realistic three flavor Skyrme model, Phys. Lett. B 447 (1999) 1–7.arXiv:nucl-th/9807038,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(98)01569-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)01569-x 1999

  72. [75]

    Girlanda, On a redundancy in the parity-violating 2-nucleon contact Lagrangian, Phys

    L. Girlanda, On a redundancy in the parity-violating 2-nucleon contact Lagrangian, Phys. Rev. C 77 (2008) 067001.arXiv:0804.0772, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.77.067001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.77.067001 2008

  73. [76]

    Epelbaum, W

    E. Epelbaum, W. Gloeckle, U.-G. Meißner, Improving the convergence of the chiral expansion for nuclear forces. 1. Peripheral phases, Eur. Phys. J. A 19 (2004) 125–137.arXiv:nucl-th/0304037,doi:10.1140/epja/i2003-10096-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2003-10096-0 2004

  74. [77]

    Kaiser, Parity-violating two-pion exchange nucleon-nucleon interaction, Phys

    N. Kaiser, Parity-violating two-pion exchange nucleon-nucleon interaction, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 047001.arXiv:0711.2233,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.047001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.047001 2007

  75. [78]

    de Vries, N

    J. de Vries, N. Li, U.-G. Meißner, N. Kaiser, X. H. Liu, S. L. Zhu, A study of the parity-odd nucleon-nucleon potential, Eur. Phys. J. A 50 (2014) 108.arXiv:1404.1576,doi:10.1140/epja/i2014-14108-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2014-14108-8 2014

  76. [79]

    D. R. Phillips, M. R. Schindler, R. P . Springer, An Effective-field-theory analysis of low-energy parity-violation in nucleon-nucleon scattering, Nucl. Phys. A 822 (2009) 1–19.arXiv:0812.2073,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.02.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2009.02.011 2009

  77. [80]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 4 (1995) 193–346.arXiv:hep-ph/ 9501384,doi:10.1142/S0218301395000092

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218301395000092 1995

  78. [81]

    Hoferichter, J

    M. Hoferichter, J. Ruiz de Elvira, B. Kubis, U.-G. Meißner, Matching pion-nucleon Roy-Steiner equations to chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (19) (2015) 192301.arXiv:1507.07552,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.192301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.115.192301 2015

  79. [82]

    Bernard, N

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, Aspects of chiral pion - nucleon physics, Nucl. Phys. A 615 (1997) 483–500.arXiv:hep-ph/9611253, doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00021-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(97)00021-3 1997

  80. [83]

    H. W. Griesshammer, M. R. Schindler, On Parity-Violating Three-Nucleon Interactions and the Predictive Power of Few-Nucleon EFT at Very Low Energies, Eur. Phys. J. A 46 (2010) 73–83.arXiv:1007.0734,doi:10.1140/epja/i2010-11017-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2010-11017-x 2010

Showing first 80 references.