pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07951 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Quasiparticle properties of a single Λ impurity in symmetric nuclear matter with a regulated NΛ interaction

Bahruz Suleymanli, Kutsal Bozkurt

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords Lambda hyperonnuclear matterquasiparticle energyself-energyladder T-matrixeffective masshypernuclear physics
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single Lambda hyperon in nuclear matter binds at -29.55 MeV at zero momentum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses the Green's function method to find the quasiparticle energy and spectral properties of one Lambda particle moving in symmetric nuclear matter. It starts from a regulated low-momentum contact interaction whose two parameters in each spin channel are fixed solely by matching the vacuum T-matrix to modern chiral-EFT scattering lengths and effective ranges. The in-medium self-energy is then obtained by summing the ladder series of N-Lambda scatterings inside the Fermi sea. At saturation density the zero-momentum pole sits at -29.55 MeV, close to the empirical single-particle potential depth; the binding splits into a static Born piece of -26.36 MeV and a smaller dynamical correlation piece of -3.19 MeV. The quasiparticle remains narrow with residue 0.98 and width 0.023 MeV, and its effective mass ratio extracted from the dispersion is 0.747.

Core claim

A non-local regulated contact potential fitted to vacuum N Lambda scattering data produces, via the in-medium ladder T-matrix, a retarded self-energy whose zero-momentum quasiparticle pole lies at E_qp(0, rho_sat) = -29.55 MeV. This pole is composed of a static Born contribution of -26.36 MeV and a dynamical correlation contribution of -3.19 MeV; the corresponding spectral function is sharply peaked with residue Z(0)=0.98 and damping width Gamma(0)=0.023 MeV. At finite momentum the binding decreases while the residue and width change only weakly, yielding m_Lambda^*/m_Lambda = 0.747 from a low-momentum fit.

What carries the argument

The retarded Lambda self-energy computed from the in-medium N Lambda ladder T-matrix that sums repeated scattering inside the nucleonic medium.

If this is right

  • The quasiparticle energy rises from -29.55 MeV at zero momentum to -6.49 MeV at k=1 fm^{-1}.
  • The residue stays near 0.98 and the width remains below 0.1 MeV over the same momentum range.
  • A low-momentum expansion of the dispersion yields an effective mass ratio m_Lambda^*/m_Lambda = 0.747.
  • The dynamical correlation piece supplies only about 11 percent of the total binding, indicating that repeated scattering supplies a modest but necessary correction.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same regulated interaction could be inserted into finite-nucleus calculations to predict single-Lambda levels in light hypernuclei.
  • The small size of the dynamical term suggests that a simpler Born-level estimate may already give the correct order of magnitude for other hyperons.
  • Extending the momentum range or adding three-body forces would test whether the effective mass ratio remains stable.
  • The narrow width implies that the Lambda propagates as a coherent quasiparticle over distances comparable to nuclear sizes.

Load-bearing premise

That the ladder summation of the regulated contact interaction, with couplings fixed only by vacuum scattering data, already captures the dominant medium effects without large higher-order corrections.

What would settle it

A precise measurement of the Lambda quasiparticle energy or the width of its spectral function in symmetric nuclear matter at saturation density that deviates significantly from -29.55 MeV or 0.023 MeV.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07951 by Bahruz Suleymanli, Kutsal Bozkurt.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Determination of the zero-momentum Λ quasiparticle energy from Eq. (20). The root of ω − Re ΣR Λ (0, ω) gives Eqp(0, ρsat) = −29.55 MeV. This value is in good agreement with the empirical depth of the Λ single￾particle potential in nuclear matter. The result in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Energy dependence of the zero-momentum Λ self-energy. The blue solid line shows Re ΣR Λ (0, ω), the red dashed line shows the static Born contribution Σ Born Λ (0), and the green dash-dotted line shows the correlation contribution Re Σcorr,R Λ (0, ω). studies, where the Λ was found to be less strongly correlated than a nucleon and to preserve a large quasiparticle strength in the nuclear medium [22, 27, 29… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Imaginary part of the zero-momentum retarded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Momentum dependence of the Λ quasiparticle properties. Panel (a) shows the quasiparticle energy Eqp(k, ρsat), panel (b) shows Re ΣR Λ (k, Eqp), with the inset showing Im ΣR Λ (k, Eqp), panel (c) shows the quasiparticle residue Z(k), and panel (d) shows the damping width Γ(k). 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 [MeV] 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 A (k, ) [M e V 1 ] k = 0.0 fm 1 k = 0.5 fm 1 k = 1.0 fm 1 [PITH_F… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Λ spectral function AΛ(k, ω) for k = 0, 0.5, and 1 fm−1 . 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Low-momentum extraction of the Λ effective mass. 4. Conclusion We have studied the quasiparticle properties of a single Λ hyperon prop￾agating through symmetric nuclear matter. The calculation was performed in the impurity limit, where ρΛ = 0 and ρn = ρp = ρsat/2. In this limit, the nucleons form the occupied Fermi sea, while the Λ hyperon is treated as a distinct quasiparticle probing the nucleonic medium… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We explore the quasiparticle properties of a single $\Lambda$ hyperon propagating through symmetric nuclear matter using the Green's function formalism. The $N\Lambda$ interaction is described by a non-local regulated low-momentum contact potential with a leading-order constant term and a next-to-leading-order derivative correction. The two coupling constants in the ${}^1S_0$ and ${}^3S_1$ channels are fixed by matching the vacuum on-shell $T$ matrix to the scattering length and effective range obtained from modern next-to-next-to-leading-order chiral effective field theory. Using this effective interaction, we calculate the retarded $\Lambda$ self-energy from the in-medium $N\Lambda$ ladder $T$ matrix, which sums repeated $N\Lambda$ scattering in the nucleonic medium. At saturation density, the zero-momentum quasiparticle pole is found at $E_{\rm qp}(0,\rho_{\rm sat})=-29.55~{\rm MeV}$, in good agreement with the empirical depth of the single $\Lambda$ potential in nuclear matter. The self-energy decomposition gives a static Born contribution $\Sigma_\Lambda^{\rm Born}(0)=-26.36~{\rm MeV}$ and a dynamical correlation contribution ${\rm Re}\,\Sigma_\Lambda^{\rm corr,R}(0,E_{\rm qp})=-3.19~{\rm MeV}$, showing that repeated in-medium $N\Lambda$ scattering is needed to reproduce the empirical binding scale. The quasiparticle remains narrow and well defined, with a large residue $Z(0)=0.98$, a small damping width $\Gamma(0)=0.023~{\rm MeV}$, and a sharp spectral peak near the quasiparticle energy. At finite momentum, the $\Lambda$ quasiparticle becomes less bound, with $E_{\rm qp}(k,\rho_{\rm sat})$ increasing from $-29.55~{\rm MeV}$ at $k=0$ to $-6.49~{\rm MeV}$ at $k=1~{\rm fm}^{-1}$, while the residue and width change only weakly. A low-momentum fit gives $m_\Lambda^*/m_\Lambda=0.747$, consistent with the range obtained in Brueckner calculations with Nijmegen hyperon--nucleon potentials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript calculates the quasiparticle properties of a single Λ hyperon in symmetric nuclear matter within the Green's function formalism. A regulated non-local contact NΛ interaction (leading-order constant plus NLO derivative term) is employed, with its two S-wave coupling constants fixed exclusively by matching the vacuum on-shell T-matrix to NNLO chiral EFT scattering lengths and effective ranges. The retarded Λ self-energy is obtained from the in-medium NΛ ladder T-matrix; at saturation density the zero-momentum quasiparticle pole lies at E_qp(0,ρ_sat) = -29.55 MeV, decomposed into a static Born term of -26.36 MeV and a dynamical correlation term of -3.19 MeV. Additional results include residue Z(0) = 0.98, width Γ(0) = 0.023 MeV, momentum dependence up to k = 1 fm^{-1}, and an effective-mass ratio m_Λ^*/m_Λ = 0.747 extracted from a low-momentum fit.

Significance. If the numerical result holds, the work demonstrates that a vacuum-constrained, regulated contact interaction treated in the ladder approximation can reproduce the empirical depth of the Λ single-particle potential without any medium-specific readjustment of parameters. The explicit separation of Born and correlation contributions, together with the reporting of spectral-function properties (residue, width, and effective mass), supplies a concrete microscopic benchmark for hypernuclear calculations. The approach is parameter-free with respect to nuclear-matter data and therefore offers a controlled test of the sufficiency of two-body ladder resummation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (results on the self-energy decomposition): The central claim that the ladder resummation is required to reach the empirical binding scale rests on the small dynamical correlation piece (-3.19 MeV). No quantitative estimate is given for the size of omitted higher-order medium corrections (three-body N N Λ forces, density-dependent vertex renormalization, or Pauli blocking in higher partial waves) that could shift the pole by an amount comparable to this correlation energy. Because the quoted agreement with the empirical depth is at the 1 MeV level, such an assessment is load-bearing for the robustness of the result.
  2. [§3] §3 (formalism of the in-medium T-matrix): The regulated contact interaction is matched only to S-wave vacuum data; the manuscript does not discuss the possible contribution of P-wave or higher channels once the Pauli operator is active in the medium. Given that the effective-mass extraction and the momentum dependence of E_qp(k) are reported, the truncation to S-waves should be justified or its uncertainty quantified.
minor comments (2)
  1. The numerical values for the regulator cutoff and the precise matching procedure to the chiral EFT scattering lengths/effective ranges are stated only in the text; they should be collected in a dedicated table or appendix for reproducibility.
  2. The low-momentum fit used to extract m_Λ^*/m_Λ = 0.747 is mentioned without specifying the momentum interval or the functional form employed; this detail is needed to allow direct comparison with other Brueckner calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the constructive major comments. We address each point below, providing clarifications on the scope of our two-body ladder calculation while incorporating additional discussion into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §4 (results on the self-energy decomposition): The central claim that the ladder resummation is required to reach the empirical binding scale rests on the small dynamical correlation piece (-3.19 MeV). No quantitative estimate is given for the size of omitted higher-order medium corrections (three-body N N Λ forces, density-dependent vertex renormalization, or Pauli blocking in higher partial waves) that could shift the pole by an amount comparable to this correlation energy. Because the quoted agreement with the empirical depth is at the 1 MeV level, such an assessment is load-bearing for the robustness of the result.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative estimate of higher-order corrections would strengthen the robustness discussion. Our calculation is performed strictly within the two-body ladder approximation with a vacuum-constrained interaction; estimating the size of three-body NNΛ forces or density-dependent vertex renormalizations would require an extended framework that is beyond the present scope. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph in §4 that explicitly states this limitation, notes that the -3.19 MeV correlation term is the dynamical contribution inside the ladder resummation, and emphasizes that the 1 MeV agreement with the empirical depth should be understood as a benchmark for two-body physics. We also reference existing chiral-EFT estimates indicating that three-body contributions to the Λ potential are typically repulsive and of order 1–3 MeV, but we do not claim a precise cancellation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: §3 (formalism of the in-medium T-matrix): The regulated contact interaction is matched only to S-wave vacuum data; the manuscript does not discuss the possible contribution of P-wave or higher channels once the Pauli operator is active in the medium. Given that the effective-mass extraction and the momentum dependence of E_qp(k) are reported, the truncation to S-waves should be justified or its uncertainty quantified.

    Authors: The regulated contact interaction consists of a leading constant term plus an NLO derivative correction and is matched exclusively to the S-wave scattering lengths and effective ranges from NNLO chiral EFT in the ¹S₀ and ³S₁ channels. Higher partial waves are not included because they would introduce additional low-energy constants not fixed by the vacuum data employed. In the revised §3 we have added a justification paragraph: at saturation density the relevant momenta are low (k_F ≈ 1.36 fm⁻¹), S-waves dominate the low-energy NΛ interaction, and chiral-EFT calculations show that P-wave contributions to the single-Λ potential are typically small and repulsive (estimated < 2 MeV). We note that the reported momentum dependence of E_qp(k) up to 1 fm⁻¹ and the effective-mass ratio are therefore governed primarily by S-wave physics, with an estimated uncertainty from omitted waves of order 10 % or less. A full quantification would require extending the potential to P-waves, which we flag as future work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative estimate of the size of omitted higher-order medium corrections (three-body NNΛ forces, density-dependent vertex renormalization, Pauli blocking in higher partial waves) that could shift the quasiparticle pole by an amount comparable to the -3.19 MeV correlation term.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation uses independent vacuum inputs to compute medium quasiparticle properties without reduction to fitted outputs or self-citations

full rationale

The paper fixes the two low-energy constants of the regulated contact interaction exclusively by matching the vacuum on-shell T-matrix to scattering lengths and effective ranges taken from external next-to-next-to-leading-order chiral EFT. It then evaluates the in-medium ladder T-matrix and the resulting retarded self-energy via the Dyson equation to obtain the quasiparticle pole position, residue, and width as direct outputs. No medium data enter the parameter determination, no self-citations supply load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansätze, and the reported decomposition into Born and correlation pieces follows from the explicit separation of the self-energy expression rather than from any redefinition of inputs. The numerical agreement with the empirical depth is therefore a genuine prediction, not a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the choice of regularization and the ladder approximation in the many-body calculation, with parameters determined from external vacuum data.

free parameters (1)
  • coupling constants in ^1S_0 and ^3S_1 channels
    Two coupling constants fixed by matching the vacuum on-shell T matrix to the scattering length and effective range from NNLO chiral EFT.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The in-medium NΛ interaction is accurately described by the ladder summation of the T-matrix
    The self-energy is calculated from the in-medium ladder T matrix summing repeated NΛ scattering.
  • domain assumption The regulated low-momentum contact potential with LO and NLO terms captures the essential physics
    Non-local regulated low-momentum contact potential used for NΛ interaction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5748 in / 1381 out tokens · 65355 ms · 2026-05-11T02:50:24.634349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    R. E. Chrien, C. B. Dover, Nuclear Systems with Strangeness, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 39 (Volume 39,) (1989) 113–150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ns.39.120189.000553. URLhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ns.39.120189.000553

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.39.120189.000553 1989

  2. [2]

    A. Gal, E. V. Hungerford, D. J. Millener, Strangeness in nuclear physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 035004. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035004. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.88.035004

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.035004 2016

  3. [3]

    K. Miwa, K. Nakazawa, H. Tamura, E. Hiyama, T. Takahashi, Nuclear systems with strangeness and baryon–baryon interactions, The Euro- pean Physical Journal A 61 (6) (2025) 128. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050- 025-01571-z. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01571-z

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050- 2025

  4. [4]

    I. Vidaña, Hyperons: the strange ingredients of the nuclear equa- tion of state, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathemati- cal, Physical and Engineering Sciences 474 (2217) (2018) 20180145. doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0145. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2018.0145

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2018.0145 2018

  5. [5]

    Y. He, T. R. Saito, H. Ekawa, A. Kasagi, Y. Gao, E. Liu, K. Nakazawa, C. Rappold, M. Taki, Y. K. Tanaka, H. Wang, A. Yanai, J. Yoshida, H. Zhang, Artificial intelligence pioneers the double-strangeness factory, Nature Communications 16 (1) (2025) 11084. doi:10.1038/s41467-025- 66517-x. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66517-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025- 2025

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1038/s41586-020- 3001-6

    ALICE/Collaboration, Unveiling the strong interaction among hadrons at the lhc, Nature 588 (7837) (2020) 232–238. doi:10.1038/s41586-020- 3001-6. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-3001-6 19

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020- 2020

  7. [7]

    S. N. Nakamura, High-precision spectroscopy ofΛhypernuclei with electron and meson beams, Few-Body Systems 67 (2) (2026) 25. doi:10.1007/s00601-026-02044-9. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-026-02044-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-026-02044-9 2026

  8. [8]

    Ajimura, H

    S. Ajimura, H. Hayakawa, T. Kishimoto, H. Kohri, K. Matsuoka, S. Mi- nami, T.Mori, K.Morikubo, E.Saji, A.Sakaguchi, Y.Shimizu, M.Sum- ihama, R. E. Chrien, M. May, P. Pile, A. Rusek, R. Sutter, P. Eugenio, G. Franklin, P. Khaustov, K. Paschke, B. P. Quinn, R. A. Schumacher, J. Franz, T. Fukuda, H. Noumi, H. Outa, L. Gan, L. Tang, L. Yuan, H. Tamura, J. Nak...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.4255 2001

  9. [9]

    Tanida, H

    K. Tanida, H. Tamura, D. Abe, H. Akikawa, K. Araki, H. Bhang, T. Endo, Y. Fujii, T. Fukuda, O. Hashimoto, K. Imai, H. Hotchi, Y. Kakiguchi, J. H. Kim, Y. D. Kim, T. Miyoshi, T. Murakami, T. Na- gae, H. Noumi, H. Outa, K. Ozawa, T. Saito, J. Sasao, Y. Sato, S. Satoh, R. I. Sawafta, M. Sekimoto, T. Takahashi, L. Tang, H. H. Xia, S. H. Zhou, L. H. Zhu, Measu...

    work page 2001

  10. [10]

    URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1982

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1982. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1982

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.1982 1982

  11. [11]

    Hotchi, T

    H. Hotchi, T. Nagae, H. Outa, H. Noumi, M. Sekimoto, T. Fukuda, H. Bhang, Y. D. Kim, J. H. Kim, H. Park, K. Tanida, O. Hashimoto, H. Tamura, T. Takahashi, Y. Sato, T. Endo, S. Satoh, J. Nishida, T. Miyoshi, T. Saitoh, T. Kishimoto, A. Sakaguchi, S. Ajimura, Y. Shimizu, T. Mori, S. Minami, M. Sumihama, R. Sawafta, L. Tang, Spectroscopy of medium-heavyΛhype...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.64.044302 2001

  12. [12]

    Garibaldi, A

    F. Garibaldi, A. Acha, P. Ambrozewicz, K. A. Aniol, P. Baturin, H. Be- naoum, J. Benesch, P. Y. Bertin, K. I. Blomqvist, W. U. Boeglin, H. Breuer, P. Brindza, P. Bydžovský, A. Camsonne, C. C. Chang, J.- P. Chen, S. Choi, E. A. Chudakov, E. Cisbani, S. Colilli, L. Coman, F. Cusanno, B. J. Craver, G. De Cataldo, C. W. de Jager, R. De Leo, 20 A. P. Deur, C. ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.99.054309 2019

  13. [13]

    Weber, R

    F. Weber, R. Negreiros, P. Rosenfield, M. Stejner, Pulsars as astrophysical laboratories for nuclear and particle physics, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 59 (1) (2007) 94– 113, international Workshop on Nuclear Physics 28th Course. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2006.12.008. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641006000822

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2006.12.008 2007

  14. [14]

    Schulze, M

    H.-J. Schulze, M. Baldo, U. Lombardo, J. Cugnon, A. Lejeune, Hy- peronic nuclear matter in Brueckner theory, Phys. Rev. C 57 (1998) 704–713. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.57.704. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.57.704

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.57.704 1998

  15. [15]

    Vidaña, A

    I. Vidaña, A. Polls, A. Ramos, L. Engvik, M. Hjorth-Jensen, Hyperon- hyperon interactions and properties of neutron star matter, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 035801. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.035801. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.62.035801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.62.035801 2000

  16. [16]

    P. B. Demorest, T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, M. S. E. Roberts, J. W. T. Hessels, A two-solar-mass neutron star measured using Shapiro delay, Nature 467 (7319) (2010) 1081–1083. doi:10.1038/nature09466. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/nature09466 21

    work page doi:10.1038/nature09466 2010

  17. [17]

    Antoniadis, P

    J. Antoniadis, P. C. C. Freire, N. Wex, T. M. Tauris, R. S. Lynch, M. H. van Kerkwijk, M. Kramer, C. Bassa, V. S. Dhillon, T. Driebe, J. W. T. Hessels, V. M. Kaspi, V. I. Kondratiev, N. Langer, T. R. Marsh, M. A. McLaughlin, T. T. Pennucci, S. M. Ransom, I. H. Stairs, J. van Leeuwen, J. P. W. Verbiest, D. G. Whelan, A massive pulsar in a compact relativis...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1233232 2013

  18. [18]

    H. T. Cromartie, E. Fonseca, S. M. Ransom, P. B. Demorest, Z. Ar- zoumanian, H. Blumer, P. R. Brook, M. E. DeCesar, T. Dolch, J. A. Ellis, R. D. Ferdman, E. C. Ferrara, N. Garver-Daniels, P. A. Gentile, M. L. Jones, M. T. Lam, D. R. Lorimer, R. S. Lynch, M. A. McLaughlin, C. Ng, D. J. Nice, T. T. Pennucci, R. Spiewak, I. H. Stairs, K. Stovall, J. K. Swigg...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2 2020

  19. [19]

    Burgio, H.-J

    G. Burgio, H.-J. Schulze, I. Vidaña, J.-B. Wei, Neutron stars and the nuclear equation of state, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 120 (2021) 103879. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103879. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641021000338

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2021.103879 2021

  20. [20]

    Lonardoni, A

    D. Lonardoni, A. Lovato, S. Gandolfi, F. Pederiva, Hyperon Puzzle: Hints from Quantum Monte Carlo Calculations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 092301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.092301. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.092301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.092301 2015

  21. [21]

    Haidenbauer, U

    J. Haidenbauer, U. G. Meißner, N. Kaiser, W. Weise, Lambda-nuclear interactionsandhyperonpuzzleinneutronstars, TheEuropeanPhysical Journal A 53 (6) (2017) 121. doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12316-4. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12316-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12316-4 2017

  22. [22]

    Providência, M

    C. Providência, M. Fortin, H. Pais, A. Rabhi, Hyperonic Stars and the Nuclear Symmetry Energy, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences Volume 6 - 2019 (2019). doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00013. URLhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/astronomy-and-space-sciences/articles/10.3389/fspas.2019.00013 22

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00013 2019

  23. [23]

    Dickhoff, C

    W. Dickhoff, C. Barbieri, Self-consistent green’s function method for nuclei and nuclear matter, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 52 (2) (2004) 377–496. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.038. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0146641004000535

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2004.02.038 2004

  24. [24]

    A. Rios, V. Somà, Self-Consistent Green’s Function Calculation of the Nucleon Mean Free Path, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 012501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.012501. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.012501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.012501 2012

  25. [25]

    V. Somà, C. Barbieri, T. Duguet, Ab initio Gorkov-Green’s func- tion calculations of open-shell nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 87 (2013) 011303. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.011303. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.011303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.87.011303 2013

  26. [26]

    Somà, Self-Consistent Green’s Function Theory for Atomic Nuclei, Frontiers in Physics Volume 8 - 2020 (2020)

    V. Somà, Self-Consistent Green’s Function Theory for Atomic Nuclei, Frontiers in Physics Volume 8 - 2020 (2020). doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00340. URLhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00340

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00340 2020

  27. [27]

    Suleymanli, K

    B. Suleymanli, K. Bozkurt, Green’s function formal- ism for impurity-induced resonances in sub-barrier proton- nucleus scattering, Nuclear Physics A 1070 (2026) 123388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2026.123388. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947426000667

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2026.123388 2026

  28. [28]

    N. J. Robertson, W. H. Dickhoff, Correlation effects onΛprop- agation in nuclear matter, Phys. Rev. C 70 (2004) 044301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044301. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.70.044301 2004

  29. [29]

    Hjorth-Jensen, A

    M. Hjorth-Jensen, A. Polls, A. Ramos, H. Müther, Self-energy ofΛin finite nuclei, Nuclear Physics A 605 (4) (1996) 458–474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(96)00190-X. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037594749600190X

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(96)00190-x 1996

  30. [30]

    Vidaña, Single-particle spectral function of theΛhy- peron in finite nuclei, Nuclear Physics A 958 (2017) 48–70

    I. Vidaña, Single-particle spectral function of theΛhy- peron in finite nuclei, Nuclear Physics A 958 (2017) 48–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.11.002. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947416302767 23

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.11.002 2017

  31. [31]

    Haidenbauer, I

    J. Haidenbauer, I. Vidaña, Structure of single-Λhypernuclei with chiral hyperon–nucleon potentials, The European Physical Journal A 56 (2) (2020) 55. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00055-6. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00055-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00055-6 2020

  32. [32]

    Haidenbauer, S

    J. Haidenbauer, S. Petschauer, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nogga, W. Weise, Hyperon–nucleon interaction at next-to-leading order in chiral effective field theory, Nuclear Physics A 915 (2013) 24–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.06.008. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947413006167

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.06.008 2013

  33. [33]

    Haidenbauer, U.-G

    J. Haidenbauer, U.-G. Meißner, A. Nogga, H. Le, Hyperon– nucleon interaction in chiral effective field theory at next-to-next-to- leading order, The European Physical Journal A 59 (3) (2023) 63. doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00960-6. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00960-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-00960-6 2023

  34. [34]

    X.-L. Ren, E. Epelbaum, J. Gegelia,Λ-nucleon scattering in baryon chiral perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 034001. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034001. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.034001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.034001 2020

  35. [35]

    Petschauer, J

    S. Petschauer, J. Haidenbauer, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meißner, W. Weise, Hyperon-Nuclear Interactions From SU(3) Chiral Ef- fective Field Theory, Frontiers in Physics Volume 8 - 2020 (2020). doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00012. URLhttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physics/articles/10.3389/fphy.2020.00012

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00012 2020

  36. [36]

    Song, Z.-W

    J. Song, Z.-W. Liu, K.-W. Li, L.-S. Geng, Test of the hyperon-nucleon interaction within leading order covariant chiral effective field theory, Phys. Rev. C 105 (2022) 035203. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.035203. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.035203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.035203 2022

  37. [37]

    Lorenzi, A

    F. Lorenzi, A. Bardin, L. Salasnich, On-shell approximation for thes-wave scattering theory, Phys. Rev. A 107 (2023) 033325. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.107.033325. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.033325

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.107.033325 2023

  38. [38]

    J.Sakurai, J.Napolitano, ModernQuantumMechanics, CambridgeUni- versity Press, 2021. 24

    work page 2021

  39. [39]

    Fetter, J

    A. Fetter, J. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many-particle Systems, Dover Books on Physics, Dover Publications, 2003

    work page 2003

  40. [40]

    D. J. Millener, C. B. Dover, A. Gal,λ-nucleus single-particle potentials, Phys. Rev. C 38 (1988) 2700–2708. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.38.2700. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.38.2700

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.38.2700 1988

  41. [41]

    Motoba, Y

    T. Motoba, Y. Yamamoto, Comparison of(k −, π)and(π, k +)as a functionofmassnumber, NuclearPhysicsA585(1)(1995)29–38, hyper- nuclear and Strange Particle Physics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375- 9474(94)00540-4. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947494005404

    work page doi:10.1016/0375- 1995

  42. [42]

    Friedman, A

    E. Friedman, A. Gal,λhypernuclear potentials beyond lin- ear density dependence, Nuclear Physics A 1039 (2023) 122725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2023.122725. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947423001288

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2023.122725 2023

  43. [43]

    Vidaña, A

    I. Vidaña, A. Polls, A. Ramos, H.-J. Schulze, Hypernuclear structure with the new nijmegen potentials, Phys. Rev. C 64 (2001) 044301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.64.044301. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.044301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.64.044301 2001

  44. [44]

    Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Dover Books on Engineering, Dover Publications, 2012

    J. Taylor, Scattering Theory: The Quantum Theory of Nonrelativistic Collisions, Dover Books on Engineering, Dover Publications, 2012. 25

    work page 2012