pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07997 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Symmetry-Breaking Effects on Form Factors and Observables in B to K₀^*(1430)μ^+μ^- Decay

Arslan Sikandar, M. Jamil Aslam, Saba Ayub, Saba Shafaq

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords B meson decaysform factorsperturbative QCDlepton polarizationnew physicssymmetry breakingbranching ratio
0
0 comments X

The pith

Perturbative QCD corrections to the form factors in B to K0*(1430) mu+ mu- decay induce only about 3% shifts in the branching ratio and normal lepton polarization asymmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper calculates symmetry-breaking corrections from perturbative QCD to the form factors governing the transition from a B meson to the scalar K0*(1430) meson. It uses relations valid in the heavy-quark and large-energy limits to reduce the number of independent form factors, then adds the corrections computed from vertex renormalization and light-cone distribution amplitudes. The resulting shifts in the branching ratio and normal lepton polarization asymmetry are modest, around 3 percent. A reader would care because this sets a clean standard-model baseline for a rare decay mode, so that any substantially larger deviation seen in data would point to new physics beyond the standard model.

Core claim

In the heavy-quark and large-energy limits, symmetry relations reduce the number of independent form factors governing heavy-to-light B-meson decays. Exploiting these relations, the form factors are parametrized while incorporating symmetry-breaking corrections from perturbative QCD. Using vertex renormalization together with light-cone distribution amplitudes, the vertex and hard-spectator contributions for the B to K0*(1430) transition are computed. These form factors then determine the branching ratio and lepton polarization asymmetries (PL, PN) in B to K0*(1430) mu+ mu-. The perturbative corrections induce modest shifts of ~3% in both the branching ratio and the normal lepton polarizaton

What carries the argument

Symmetry relations valid in the heavy-quark and large-energy limits, which reduce the independent form factors, together with perturbative QCD corrections added through vertex renormalization and light-cone distribution amplitudes.

If this is right

  • The branching ratio of B to K0*(1430) mu+ mu- receives a shift of approximately 3% from the perturbative corrections.
  • The normal lepton polarization asymmetry in the same decay also shifts by about 3%.
  • These small corrections establish a reliable standard-model prediction against which experimental data can be compared.
  • Significant deviations from the predicted values would constitute evidence for new physics contributions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-plus-perturbation method could be applied to other B decays involving scalar mesons to check for consistent patterns of small corrections.
  • If new physics modifies the underlying form factors, its effects would need to exceed the 3% perturbative shift to be distinguishable in this channel.
  • Future high-precision data on this decay could set quantitative bounds on the size of new physics contributions once the standard-model baseline is fixed.

Load-bearing premise

The heavy-quark and large-energy limits allow symmetry relations to reduce the number of independent form factors governing the transition, and perturbative QCD corrections can be reliably computed and added using vertex renormalization together with light-cone distribution amplitudes.

What would settle it

A measurement of the branching ratio or normal lepton polarization asymmetry in B to K0*(1430) mu+ mu- that differs from the calculated standard-model value by substantially more than a few percent, after uncertainties are accounted for.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07997 by Arslan Sikandar, M. Jamil Aslam, Saba Ayub, Saba Shafaq.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Vertex and Hard Spectator Corrections in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Form factors are plotted as function of momentum transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The branching ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The lepton polarization of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the heavy-quark and large-energy limits, symmetry relations reduce the number of independent form factors governing heavy-to-light $B$-meson decays. Exploiting these relations, the form factors can be parametrized while systematically incorporating symmetry-breaking corrections from perturbative QCD. Using vertex renormalization together with light-cone distribution amplitudes, we compute the vertex and hard-spectator contributions for the $B \to K_0^*(1430)$ transition. We then analyze the impact of these form factors on physical observables, including the branching ratio and lepton polarization asymmetries $(P_L, P_N)$, in $B \to K_0^*(1430)\mu^+\mu^-$. Our results indicate that perturbative corrections induce modest shifts of $\sim 3\%$ in both the branching ratio and the normal lepton polarization asymmetry. Consequently, any significant deviation observed experimentally from these predictions would provide a clear signal of potential New Physics effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies heavy-quark and large-energy symmetry relations to reduce the number of independent form factors for the B → K_0^*(1430) transition. It incorporates symmetry-breaking perturbative QCD corrections using vertex renormalization and light-cone distribution amplitudes to parametrize the form factors. These are then used to evaluate the branching ratio and lepton polarization asymmetries P_L and P_N in the decay B → K_0^*(1430) μ^+ μ^-. The central finding is that the perturbative corrections induce shifts of about 3% in the branching ratio and the normal lepton polarization asymmetry, which could serve as a baseline for detecting New Physics if larger deviations are seen experimentally.

Significance. This calculation offers a concrete assessment of the impact of symmetry-breaking effects in a specific rare B decay, which is useful for the flavor physics community. By quantifying the modest size of the corrections (~3%), it strengthens the case for using these predictions to search for deviations indicative of New Physics. The approach is grounded in established methods, providing a reliable SM reference point. No machine-checked proofs or reproducible code are included, but the method follows standard techniques in the literature for similar decays.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction and form-factor section] The abstract and introduction should explicitly state the specific light-cone distribution amplitude models adopted for the K_0^* meson and the renormalization scale choices, as these directly affect the size of the quoted 3% shifts.
  2. [Numerical results] In the numerical analysis, provide a breakdown (e.g., in a table) of the separate vertex and hard-spectator contributions to the form factors before and after corrections, to allow readers to verify the origin of the ~3% effect on the branching ratio and P_N.
  3. [Observables and results] Clarify the error propagation for the 3% shifts, including variation of input parameters such as LCDA moments or quark masses, to confirm numerical stability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our work and the recommendation of minor revision. The referee's summary accurately captures our use of heavy-quark and large-energy symmetry relations to parametrize the B to K0*(1430) form factors, the inclusion of perturbative QCD symmetry-breaking corrections via vertex renormalization and light-cone distribution amplitudes, and the resulting modest ~3% shifts in the branching ratio and normal lepton polarization asymmetry P_N, which serve as a Standard Model baseline for New Physics searches.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The derivation applies standard heavy-quark/large-energy symmetry relations to reduce the number of independent form factors for the B → K0*(1430) transition, then adds perturbative QCD corrections (vertex renormalization plus hard-spectator terms from light-cone distribution amplitudes). The reported ~3% shifts in branching ratio and normal polarization asymmetry are computed outputs from these form factors. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations or self-citation to a fitted input renamed as prediction, a self-definitional loop, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work by the same authors. The central claim remains independent of its inputs and follows established methods without internal tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of heavy-quark effective theory and perturbative QCD. No new particles or forces are postulated. Free parameters (e.g., specific values inside the form-factor parametrization or light-cone distribution amplitudes) are not enumerated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Heavy-quark and large-energy limits allow symmetry relations to reduce the number of independent form factors
    Explicitly invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the starting point for parametrization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1315 out tokens · 45137 ms · 2026-05-11T02:41:05.000384+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The study of light scalar mesons with masses below 1.5 GeV serves as an intriguing subject of study due to their non trivial internal structure

    denotes a scalar meson, provide an additional probe of the underlying flavor dynamics. The study of light scalar mesons with masses below 1.5 GeV serves as an intriguing subject of study due to their non trivial internal structure. While they are usually viewed as conventional quarks-antiquark states [22], alternate descriptions have been proposed dependi...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Further details of these can be found in the Appendix A. Correspondingly the heavy meson projector used in this calculation are: MB jk =− ifBmB 4 1 + /v 2 ϕB +(l+) /n+ +ϕ B −(l+) /n− −l + γν ⊥ ∂ ∂l ν ⊥ γ5 jk l= l+ 2 n+ ,(32) where,ϕ B +(l+) andϕ B −(l+) are the distribution amplitudes of theB-meson which are discussed in Appendix B. The hard scattering am...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Lepton polarizations The lepton pair produced in this decay has longitudinal, normal and transverse components of polarization. The expression for longitudinal polarization can be summarized as: PL(q2)∝ 1− 4m2 l q2 " (−Ceff 9 f+(q2)pµ + 4mb mB +m K∗ 0 Ceff 7 fT (q2)pµ))(−C10f+(q2)pµ)∗ + (−Ceff 9 f+(q2)pµ + 4mb mB +m K∗ 0 Ceff 7 fT (q2)pµ)∗(−C10f+(q2)pµ) #...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Aaijet al.,Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries ofB→K (∗)µ+µ− decays, JHEP06(2014) 133,arXiv:1403.8044

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP06, 133 (2014), arXiv:1403.8044 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2014

  5. [5]

    Aaij et al

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP05, 082 (2014), arXiv:1403.8045 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2014

  6. [6]

    Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP09, 179 (2015), arXiv:1506.08777 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP09, 179 (2015), arXiv:1506.08777 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    Aaijet al.,Angular analysis of the B0 →K ∗0µ+µ− decay using3fb −1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP02(2016) 104,arXiv:1512.04442

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP02, 104 (2016), arXiv:1512.04442 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2016

  8. [8]

    Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP11, 047 (2016); erratum: JHEP04, 142 (2017), arXiv:1606.04731 [hep-ex]

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), JHEP11, 047 (2016); erratum: JHEP04, 142 (2017), arXiv:1606.04731 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2016

  9. [9]

    Aaijet al.,Branching fraction measurements of the rare B0 s →ϕµ +µ− and B0 s →f ′ 2(1525)µ+µ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.127(15), 151801 (2021), arXiv:2105.14007 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Aaijet al.,Angular analysis of the rare decay B0 s →ϕµ +µ−, JHEP11(2021) 043,arXiv:2107.13428

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration),JHEP11, 043 (2021),arXiv:2107.13428 [hep-ex]. 16

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Aaijet al.,Measurement of lepton universality parameters in B+ →K +ℓ+ℓ− and B0 →K ∗0ℓ+ℓ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. D108(3), 032002 (2023), arXiv:2212.09153 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Aaijet al.,Test of lepton universality in b→sℓ +ℓ− decays, Phys

    R. Aaijet al., (LHCb Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett.131(5), 051803 (2023), arXiv:2212.09152 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Smith [LHCb], [arXiv:2405.11890 [hep-ex]]

    M. Smith (LHCb Collaboration), arXiv:2405.11890 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv

  14. [14]

    Hayrapetyanet al.,Test of lepton flavor universality in B± →K ±µ+µ− and B± →K ±e+e− decays in proton-proton collisions at √s = 13 TeV, Rept

    A. Hayrapetyanet al., (CMS Collaboration), Rept. Prog. Phys.87(7), 077802 (2024), arXiv:2401.07090 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Celis,et al., Phys

    A. Celis,et al., Phys. Rev. D96(3), 035026 (2017), arXiv:1704.05672 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Buttazzo, A

    D. Buttazzo,et al., JHEP11, 044 (2017), arXiv:1706.07808 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Aebischer,et al., Eur

    J. Aebischer,et al., Eur. Phys. J. C80(3), 252 (2020), arXiv:1903.10434 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Alasfaret al., JHEP12, 016 (2020), arXiv:2007.04400 [hep-ph]

    L. Alasfaret al., JHEP12, 016 (2020), arXiv:2007.04400 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Isidoriet al., Phys

    G. Isidoriet al., Phys. Lett. B830, 137151 (2022), arXiv:2110.09882 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    Ciuchini, M

    M. Ciuchiniet al., Phys. Rev. D107(5), 055036 (2023), arXiv:2212.10516 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Hiller and F

    G. Hiller and F. Kr¨ uger, Phys. Rev. D69, 074020 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0310219

    work page arXiv 2004

  22. [22]

    Bordone, G

    M. Bordone, G. Isidori and A. Pattori, Eur. Phys. J. C76(8), 440 (2016), arXiv:1605.07633 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Mishra and N

    D. Mishra and N. Mahajan, Phys. Rev. D103(5), 056022 (2021), arXiv:2010.10853 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Isidori, S

    G. Isidori, S. Nabeebaccus and R. Zwicky, JHEP12, 104 (2020), arXiv:2009.00929 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Chenet al., Phys

    L. Chenet al., Phys. Rev. D105, 016002 (2022), arXiv:2112.00915 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    Cheng and J

    S. Cheng and J. M. Shen, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 554 (2020), arXiv:1907.08401 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    H. Y. Hanet al., Eur. Phys. J. A49, 78 (2013), arXiv:1301.3978 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  28. [28]

    Bharucha, D.M

    A. Bharucha, D. M. Straub and R. Zwicky, J. High Energy Phys.08, 098 (2016), arXiv:1503.05534 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    D. S. Du, J. W. Li and M. Z. Yang, Phys. Lett. B619, 105 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0409302

    work page arXiv 2005

  30. [30]

    C. D. Lu, Y. M. Wang and H. Zou, Phys. Rev. D75, 056001 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0612210

    work page arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    Wirbel, B

    M. Wirbel, B. Stech and M. Bauer, Z. Phys. C29, 637 (1985)

    work page 1985

  32. [32]

    Cheung, W.-M

    C.-Y. Cheung, W.-M. Zhang and G.-L. Lin, Phys. Rev. D52, 2915 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9505232

    work page arXiv 1995

  33. [33]

    Zhang, G.-L

    W.-M. Zhang, G.-L. Lin and C.-Y. Cheung, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A11, 3297 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9412394

    work page arXiv 1996

  34. [34]

    Choi and C.-R

    H.-M. Choi and C.-R. Ji, Phys. Lett. B460, 461 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9903496

    work page arXiv 1999

  35. [35]

    M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. Phys. B147, 448 (1979)

    work page 1979

  36. [36]

    V. A. Novikovet al., Nucl. Phys. B191, 301 (1981)

    work page 1981

  37. [37]

    I. I. Balitsky, V. M. Braun and A. V. Kolesnichenko, Nucl. Phys. B312, 509 (1989)

    work page 1989

  38. [38]

    V. M. Braun and I. E. Filyanov, Z. Phys. C44, 157 (1989)

    work page 1989

  39. [39]

    V. L. Chernyak and I. R. Zhitnitsky, Nucl. Phys. B345, 137 (1990)

    work page 1990

  40. [40]

    Keum, H.-n

    Y.-Y. Keum, H.-N. Li and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Lett. B504, 6 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0004004

    work page arXiv 2001

  41. [41]

    Keum, H.-N

    Y.-Y. Keum, H.-N. Li and A. I. Sanda, Phys. Rev. D63, 054008 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0004173

    work page arXiv 2001

  42. [42]

    C.-D. Lu, K. Ukai and M.-Z. Yang, Phys. Rev. D63, 074009 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0004213

    work page arXiv 2001

  43. [43]

    Gubernari, A

    N. Gubernari, A. Kokulu and D. van Dyk, J. High Energy Phys.01, 150 (2019), arXiv:1811.00983 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Nucl. Phys. B592, 3 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0008255

    work page arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    Beneke, T

    M. Benekeet al., Nucl. Phys. B612, 25 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0106067

    work page arXiv 2001

  46. [46]

    Hatanaka and K.-C

    H. Hatanaka and K.-C. Yang, Phys. Rev. D78, 094023 (2008), arXiv:0804.3198 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  47. [47]

    M. A. Parachaet al., Eur. Phys. J. C52, 967 (2007), arXiv:0707.0733 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  48. [48]

    Momeni and R

    S. Momeni and R. Khosravi, Phys. Rev. D96, 016018 (2017), arXiv:1804.04844 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Isgur and M

    N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B232, 113 (1989)

    work page 1989

  50. [50]

    Isgur and M

    N. Isgur and M. B. Wise, Phys. Lett. B237, 527 (1990)

    work page 1990

  51. [51]

    Grinstein, Nucl

    B. Grinstein, Nucl. Phys. B339, 253 (1990)

    work page 1990

  52. [52]

    Heavy quark symmetry,

    M. Neubert, Phys. Rep.245, 259 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9306320

    work page arXiv 1994

  53. [53]

    Charleset al., Phys

    J. Charleset al., Phys. Rev. D60, 014001 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9812358

    work page arXiv 1999

  54. [54]

    A. G. Grozin and M. Neubert, Phys. Rev. D55, 272 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9607366

    work page arXiv 1997

  55. [55]

    Georgi, Phys

    H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B240, 447 (1990)

    work page 1990

  56. [56]

    Khodjamirian, T

    A. Khodjamirian, T. Mannel and Y. M. Wang, J. High Energy Phys.02, 010 (2013), arXiv:1211.0234 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    Khodjamirian, T

    A. Khodjamirianet al., J. High Energy Phys.09, 089 (2010), arXiv:1006.4945 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Shafaq, I

    S. Shafaq, I. Ahmed and M. J. Aslam, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34, 1950046 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Beneke, G

    M. Benekeet al., Nucl. Phys. B591, 313 (2000), arXiv:hep-ph/0006124

    work page arXiv 2000

  60. [60]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Eur. Phys. J. C33, S241 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0308303

    work page arXiv 2004

  61. [61]

    Beneke and T

    M. Beneke and T. Feldmann, Nucl. Phys. B685, 249 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0311335

    work page arXiv 2004

  62. [62]

    Weak decays beyond leading logarithms,

    G. Buchalla, A. J. Buras and M. E. Lautenbacher, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 1125 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512380

    work page arXiv 1996

  63. [63]

    C. W. Bauer, D. Pirjol and I. W. Stewart, Phys. Rev. D67, 071502 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0211069. 17

    work page arXiv 2003

  64. [64]

    Greub, V

    C. Greub, V. Pilipp and C. Schupbach, J. High Energy Phys.12, 040 (2008), arXiv:0810.4077 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  65. [65]

    Ebert, R

    D. Ebert, R. N. Faustov and V. O. Galkin, Phys. Rev. D64, 094022 (2001), arXiv:hep-ph/0107065

    work page arXiv 2001

  66. [66]

    Sikandaret al., Phys

    A. Sikandaret al., Phys. Rev. D100, 056013 (2019), arXiv:1909.04384 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2019

  67. [67]

    Sikandaret al., J

    A. Sikandaret al., J. Phys. G49, 105002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Khodjamirianet al., Phys

    A. Khodjamirianet al., Phys. Lett. B410, 275 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9706303

    work page arXiv 1997

  69. [69]

    Bagan, P

    E. Bagan, P. Ball and V. M. Braun, Phys. Lett. B417, 154 (1998), arXiv:hep-ph/9709243

    work page arXiv 1998

  70. [70]

    Gelhausenet al., Phys

    P. Gelhausenet al., Phys. Rev. D88, 014015 (2013), arXiv:1305.5432 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2013

  71. [71]

    Y. L. Yanget al., Eur. Phys. J. C85, 64 (2025), arXiv:2410.09363 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Y. M. Wang, M. J. Aslam and C. D. Lu, Phys. Rev. D78, 014006 (2008), arXiv:0804.2204 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  73. [73]

    M. J. Aslam, Phys. Rev. D83, 035017 (2011), arXiv:1007.4865 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  74. [74]

    Khosravi, Phys

    R. Khosravi, Phys. Rev. D109, 036003 (2024), arXiv:2401.05155 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  75. [75]

    Aubertet al., Phys

    B. Aubertet al., Phys. Rev. D80, 111105 (2009), arXiv:0907.1681 [hep-ex]

    work page arXiv 2009

  76. [76]

    Beneke and J

    M. Beneke and J. Rohrwild, Eur. Phys. J. C71, 1818 (2011), arXiv:1110.3228 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2011

  77. [77]

    Amsleret al., Phys

    C. Amsleret al., Phys. Lett. B667, 1-1340 (2008)

    work page 2008

  78. [78]

    Chenget al., Phys

    H.-Y. Chenget al., Phys. Rev. D73, 014017 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0508104. 18

    work page arXiv 2006