pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08335 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Inner Horizon Saddles and a Spectral KSW Criterion

Jacqueline Caminiti , Aidan Herderschee
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 00:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords inner horizon saddlecomplex geometryblack hole entropynear-extremal black holesJT gravityKSW criterionpath integraldensity of states
0
0 comments X

The pith

The entropy correction for near-extremal charged black holes arises from a complex inner-horizon saddle in the gravitational path integral.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the semiclassical correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy for charged black holes approaching extremality takes the form minus the exponential of the inner horizon area divided by 4G. This term is realized by a complex saddle geometry that has a negative boundary length and terminates at the inner horizon. The saddle's contribution, including its minus sign, is analyzed using Picard-Lefschetz methods on the inverse Laplace contour and a stability check, leading to the vanishing density of states as the horizons coincide. The authors note that this geometry violates the standard KSW allowability criterion for complex metrics, yet one-loop effects remain well-defined if wrong-sign modes are treated carefully, prompting a weaker spectral version of the criterion.

Core claim

The correction term -exp(A_inner/4G) from JT gravity results corresponds to a complex saddle geometry of the bulk gravitational path integral. The proposed geometry has a negative boundary length and caps off at the inner horizon; it is called the inner horizon saddle. Through Picard-Lefschetz analysis of the inverse Laplace contour together with a stability analysis, the saddle and its accompanying minus sign contribute to the density of states. Despite violating the KSW allowability criterion, one-loop effects on the saddle can be described by carefully treating wrong-sign modes, leading to the proposal of a weaker spectral KSW criterion that characterizes when one-loop corrections around,

What carries the argument

The inner horizon saddle, a complex geometry with negative boundary length that caps off at the inner horizon and supplies the minus-exp(A_inner/4G) correction.

If this is right

  • The density of states for charged black holes vanishes toward extremality because the outer-horizon and inner-horizon contributions cancel.
  • Picard-Lefschetz analysis of the inverse Laplace contour shows how the minus sign from the saddle enters the density of states.
  • One-loop corrections around the inner horizon saddle remain finite once wrong-sign modes are treated appropriately.
  • The spectral KSW criterion relaxes the original KSW allowability condition while still guaranteeing well-defined one-loop effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The inner-horizon saddle construction may generalize to other near-extremal black-hole solutions in higher dimensions where inner horizons are present.
  • The spectral KSW criterion could be applied to simpler toy models of complex saddles to test whether it systematically identifies cases with finite one-loop determinants.
  • If the saddle picture holds, boundary CFT calculations of the density of states should exhibit the same cancellation between outer- and inner-horizon contributions.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical correction -exp(A_inner/4G) from standard JT gravity is precisely realized by the proposed inner-horizon saddle geometry with negative boundary length.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the path-integral contribution from the proposed saddle that fails to reproduce -exp(A_inner/4G) or that produces a divergent one-loop determinant even after handling wrong-sign modes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08335 by Aidan Herderschee, Jacqueline Caminiti.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An illustration of the inner horizon saddle. The geometry is complexified near the dotted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The complex-r plane with the branch cut of √ h = (r 2 − r 2 +) 1/2 shown as a squiggly line. (a) The cigar contour S1 (red) lives on the first sheet of √ h. It runs along the real axis from the cap at r = r+ to the boundary at r → ∞, and √ h is positive throughout. (b) The inner horizon contour S2 (orange) lives on the second sheet of √ h. It runs from the cap at r = −r+, towards the outer horizon. It avoi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The real and imaginary parts of χ(x) for m2 ℓ 2 = 5/2 and J = 1. The solution is regular at the inner horizon x = −1 (the cap), and has a singularity at the outer horizon x = 1. The singularity is harmless because the inner horizon contour passes above x = 1 it in the complex x-plane. with J being a perturbatively small constant.9 Here, we are working in the rescaled coordinates x = r/r+, θ = r+τ , in whic… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) The contour deformation from the inverse Laplace contour C1 (green, dashed) to the steepest descent contour C2 (red, solid). The wiggly line along the negative real axis is the branch cut of β −3/2 . (b) The anti-thimbles (blue) through the saddle points β+ and β− both intersect the original contour C1 (green, dashed), as is necessary for both saddles contribute to the integral. phase function f(β) = β… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The saddle contours S1 (cigar) and S2 (inner horizon) in the complex-ρ plane. The branch cut of √ h = p sinh2 ρ connects the two zeros at ρ = 0 and ρ = iπ and is shown as a squiggly line. (a) S1 lives on the first sheet of √ h and runs along the real axis from ρ = 0 to the boundary at ρb. (b) S2 lives on the second sheet; it caps off at ρ = iπ and runs to the real axis, passing through Im ρ = π/2, where th… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: KSW sum along the inner horizon contour for various stretching parameters A. The bound π (dashed) is violated near the midpoint of the transition region. Right: Maximum KSW violation vs. A. The violation decreases as O(1/A) but never vanishes. exceeding the KSW bound — see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scatter plot of the scalar Laplacian spectrum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) A winding contour in the complex x = r/r+ plane, with the branch cut of √ √ h = x 2 − 1 shown as a squiggly line. Starting at the cap x = −1, the contour runs to x = 1, turning once around it, then runs to x = −1, turning once around it, and finally escapes to x → ∞ through the upper half plane. (b) An inner horizon saddle with winding number 1; the dotted circles correspond to the intermediate complex… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Depending on whether p/q approaches 1/ √ 2 from above or below, the accumulation ray with angle 2πp/q will approach the Agmon angle from the left or from the right. ray which approaches 2π/√ 2 from the left, versus a 2πp/q ray which approaches 2π/√ 2 from the right, can be derived by looking at the r = 1 term in Eq. (C.9): ζO(s) = X n λ −s n ∋ q −2s e −is argθ (e 2πip/q) ζH(2s, 1/q). (C.17) When 2πp/q cros… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy formula $\rho = e^{A/4G}$ receives significant corrections for charged black holes near extremality. Using standard results in JT gravity, the correction term can semiclassically be expressed as minus the exponential of the inner horizon area, $e^{A_{\text{inner}}/4G}$, and the cancellation between these two exponentials enforces a vanishing density of states towards extremality, when the two horizons collide. Building on arXiv:2402.10162, we argue that the correction term corresponds to a complex saddle geometry of the bulk gravitational path integral. The proposed geometry has a negative boundary length and caps off at the inner horizon; we refer to it as the inner horizon saddle. We discuss how the saddle, and its accompanying minus sign, contribute to the density of states through a Picard-Lefschetz analysis of the inverse Laplace contour, together with a stability analysis of the saddle. We also address the inner horizon saddle's violation of the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten (KSW) allowability criterion for the inclusion of complex metrics. Despite this violation, which is believed to cause unphysical divergences in path integral computations, one can describe one-loop effects on the inner horizon saddle by carefully treating wrong-sign modes. Motivated by this observation, we propose a weaker version of the KSW criterion, which we call the spectral KSW criterion. Its purpose is to characterize when one-loop corrections around complex gravitational saddles are well defined.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the semiclassical correction -exp(A_inner/4G) to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy for near-extremal charged black holes, known from JT gravity, arises from a complex saddle in the bulk gravitational path integral. This 'inner horizon saddle' has negative boundary length and terminates at the inner horizon. The authors invoke Picard-Lefschetz contour deformation to obtain the minus sign, perform a stability analysis, and address the saddle's violation of the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten (KSW) criterion by proposing a weaker 'spectral KSW criterion' that permits well-defined one-loop corrections via careful treatment of wrong-sign modes.

Significance. If the identification of the proposed saddle with the exact JT correction term holds, the work supplies a geometric bulk origin for the cancellation that enforces vanishing density of states at extremality. The explicit handling of KSW violation and the introduction of the spectral KSW criterion constitute a constructive advance that could be applied to other complex saddles in quantum gravity. The manuscript properly credits the underlying JT results and prior work (arXiv:2402.10162) while focusing on the new geometric and criterion elements.

major comments (2)
  1. The central identification—that the inner-horizon saddle with negative boundary length contributes precisely -exp(A_inner/4G), including the overall sign and prefactor—is asserted on the basis of consistency with standard JT results rather than derived from an explicit evaluation of the saddle's on-shell action plus one-loop determinant. This step is load-bearing for the interpretation of the correction as arising from the bulk saddle; without the matching calculation, the contribution could differ by a phase, normalization, or subleading term.
  2. In the stability analysis and one-loop discussion, the treatment of wrong-sign modes is used to motivate the spectral KSW criterion, but the criterion itself is not given a precise, operator-level definition (e.g., in terms of the spectrum of the quadratic fluctuation operator) that would allow independent verification or application to other saddles.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and introduction would benefit from a one-sentence reminder of the precise JT correction formula being reproduced, to make the mapping immediately clear to readers unfamiliar with the cited literature.
  2. Notation for the negative boundary length should be introduced with an explicit comparison to the usual positive-length boundary condition to avoid potential confusion in the geometric construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us strengthen the presentation. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and a more precise formulation of the spectral KSW criterion.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central identification—that the inner-horizon saddle with negative boundary length contributes precisely -exp(A_inner/4G), including the overall sign and prefactor—is asserted on the basis of consistency with standard JT results rather than derived from an explicit evaluation of the saddle's on-shell action plus one-loop determinant. This step is load-bearing for the interpretation of the correction as arising from the bulk saddle; without the matching calculation, the contribution could differ by a phase, normalization, or subleading term.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this important observation. The on-shell action of the inner horizon saddle is evaluated explicitly in Section 3 by substituting the complex metric into the Einstein-Hilbert action; the resulting value has real part equal to A_inner/4G, with the negative boundary length ensuring consistency with the inner-horizon geometry. The overall minus sign follows directly from the Picard-Lefschetz deformation of the inverse Laplace contour, as detailed in Section 4. We acknowledge, however, that the one-loop prefactor is matched to the known JT result rather than recomputed from the full fluctuation spectrum on the complex background. A direct one-loop calculation would require a complete analysis of the quadratic operator on the complex saddle, which lies beyond the scope of the present work. In the revised manuscript we have added a clarifying paragraph in Section 4 that explicitly states the assumptions underlying the prefactor and emphasizes that the leading exponential and sign are fixed by the saddle geometry and contour alone. revision: yes

  2. Referee: In the stability analysis and one-loop discussion, the treatment of wrong-sign modes is used to motivate the spectral KSW criterion, but the criterion itself is not given a precise, operator-level definition (e.g., in terms of the spectrum of the quadratic fluctuation operator) that would allow independent verification or application to other saddles.

    Authors: We agree that a sharper, operator-level definition improves the utility of the proposed criterion. The original manuscript introduces the spectral KSW criterion heuristically from the observation that wrong-sign modes, although present, can be integrated along deformed contours without producing divergences, as verified by the stability analysis. In the revised version we have added an explicit definition in Section 6: a complex saddle satisfies the spectral KSW criterion if and only if the quadratic fluctuation operator possesses a finite number of negative eigenvalues (the wrong-sign modes) while the remainder of the spectrum lies in the positive half-plane, such that a finite contour deformation renders the one-loop determinant well-defined and finite. This formulation is now tied directly to the spectrum computed in the stability analysis and is stated in a manner that permits independent verification and application to other complex saddles. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper takes the semiclassical correction -exp(A_inner/4G) as an established input from standard JT gravity results (cited from prior literature, not derived here). It then proposes an independent complex saddle geometry (negative boundary length, capping at the inner horizon) and argues for its correspondence via Picard-Lefschetz analysis and a new spectral KSW criterion. No step equates the saddle contribution to the JT term by construction, redefinition, or self-citation reduction; the geometry and criterion are introduced as novel elements rather than fitted or renamed inputs. The chain remains self-contained against external JT benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard JT gravity results for the entropy correction and introduces one new postulated geometry without independent falsifiable evidence outside the proposal itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard results in JT gravity give the semiclassical correction to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as minus the exponential of the inner horizon area.
    Invoked in the abstract as the starting point for identifying the saddle.
invented entities (1)
  • inner horizon saddle no independent evidence
    purpose: Complex saddle geometry that supplies the -exp(A_inner/4G) correction and contributes to the density of states via Picard-Lefschetz.
    New geometry with negative boundary length that caps at the inner horizon; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5566 in / 1509 out tokens · 57016 ms · 2026-05-12T00:47:19.930441+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Semi-classical dilaton gravity and the very blunt defect expansion,

    Jorrit Kruthoff and Adam Levine, “Semi-classical dilaton gravity and the very blunt defect expansion,” JHEP07, 211 (2025), arXiv:2402.10162 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity,” Phys. Rev. D15, 2752–2756 (1977)

    work page 1977

  3. [3]

    Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,

    S. W. Hawking and Don N. Page, “Thermodynamics of Black Holes in anti-De Sitter Space,” Commun. Math. Phys.87, 577 (1983)

    work page 1983

  4. [4]

    Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,JHEP09 (2020) 002 [arXiv:1905.08255]

    Geoffrey Penington, “Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox,” JHEP09, 002 (2020), arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Almheiri, N

    Ahmed Almheiri, Netta Engelhardt, Donald Marolf, and Henry Maxfield, “The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” JHEP12, 063 (2019), arXiv:1905.08762 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

    Geoff Penington, Stephen H. Shenker, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang, “Replica worm- holes and the black hole interior,” JHEP03, 205 (2022), arXiv:1911.11977 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,

    Donald Marolf and Henry Maxfield, “Transcending the ensemble: baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,” JHEP08, 044 (2020), arXiv:2002.08950 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  8. [8]

    Balasubramanian, A

    Vijay Balasubramanian, Albion Lawrence, Javier M. Magan, and Martin Sasieta, “Microscopic Origin of the Entropy of Black Holes in General Relativity,” Phys. Rev. X14, 011024 (2024), arXiv:2212.02447 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    Constructing all BPS black hole microstates from the gravitational path integral,

    Jan Boruch, Luca V. Iliesiu, and Cynthia Yan, “Constructing all BPS black hole microstates from the gravitational path integral,” JHEP09, 058 (2024), arXiv:2307.13051 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,

    Luca V. Iliesiu, Adam Levine, Henry W. Lin, Henry Maxfield, and M´ ark Mezei, “On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,” JHEP10, 220 (2024), arXiv:2403.08696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    How the Hilbert space of two-sided black holes factorises,

    Jan Boruch, Luca V. Iliesiu, Guanda Lin, and Cynthia Yan, “How the Hilbert space of two-sided black holes factorises,” JHEP06, 092 (2025), arXiv:2406.04396 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  12. [12]

    Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations,

    Ji Hoon Lee and Douglas Stanford, “Bulk thimbles dual to trace relations,” (2024), arXiv:2412.20769 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Trace relations and open string vacua,

    Ji Hoon Lee, “Trace relations and open string vacua,” JHEP02, 224 (2024), arXiv:2312.00242 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    The giant graviton expansion,

    Davide Gaiotto and Ji Hoon Lee, “The giant graviton expansion,” JHEP08, 025 (2024), arXiv:2109.02545 [hep-th] 52

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    The giant graviton expansion in AdS5×S5,

    Giorgos Eleftheriou, Sameer Murthy, and Mart´ ı Rossell´ o, “The giant graviton expansion in AdS5×S5,” (2023), arXiv:2312.14921 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,

    Luca V. Iliesiu and Gustavo J. Turiaci, “The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes,” JHEP05, 145 (2021), arXiv:2003.02860 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  17. [17]

    Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography,

    Gustavo Joaquin Turiaci, “Les Houches lectures on two-dimensional gravity and holography,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes113, 1 (2026), arXiv:2412.09537 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Lower Dimensional Gravity,

    R. Jackiw, “Lower Dimensional Gravity,” Nucl. Phys. B252, 343–356 (1985)

    work page 1985

  19. [19]

    Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes,

    Eric Poisson and W. Israel, “Inner-horizon instability and mass inflation in black holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1663–1666 (1989)

    work page 1989

  20. [20]

    Internal structure of black holes,

    Eric Poisson and W. Israel, “Internal structure of black holes,” Phys. Rev. D41, 1796–1809 (1990)

    work page 1990

  21. [21]

    Kontsevich and G

    Maxim Kontsevich and Graeme Segal, “Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory,” Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.72, 673–699 (2021), arXiv:2105.10161 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Witten,A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,2111.06514

    Edward Witten, “A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,” (11 2021), arXiv:2111.06514 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Benetti Genolini, O

    Pietro Benetti Genolini, Oliver Janssen, and Sameer Murthy, “Allowable complex metrics and the gravitational index of AdS 5 black holes,” (1 2026), arXiv:2601.23197 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  24. [24]

    Benetti Genolini and S

    Pietro Benetti Genolini and Sameer Murthy, “The gravitational index and allowable complex metrics,” J. Phys. A58, 215401 (2025), arXiv:2503.20866 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Krishna and F

    Vineeth Krishna and Finn Larsen, “Allowable Complex Black Holes in the Euclidean Gravita- tional Path Integral,” (2 2026), arXiv:2602.05979 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity

    Phil Saad, Stephen H. Shenker, and Douglas Stanford, “A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity,” (6 2018), arXiv:1806.06840 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  27. [27]

    Comments on the double cone wormhole,

    Yiming Chen, Victor Ivo, and Juan Maldacena, “Comments on the double cone wormhole,” JHEP04, 124 (2024), arXiv:2310.11617 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Estimating global charge violating ampli- tudes from wormholes,

    Ibrahima Bah, Yiming Chen, and Juan Maldacena, “Estimating global charge violating ampli- tudes from wormholes,” JHEP04, 061 (2023), arXiv:2212.08668 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Fumagalli, V

    Alessandro Fumagalli, Victor Gorbenko, and Joshua Kames-King, “De Sitter Bra-Ket worm- holes,” JHEP05, 074 (2025), arXiv:2408.08351 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Two-point correlators in de Sitter-prepared states with bra-ket wormholes,

    Sunghoon Jung, Minju Kum, and Junghwan Lee, “Two-point correlators in de Sitter-prepared states with bra-ket wormholes,” (12 2025), arXiv:2512.13646 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,

    C. Teitelboim, “Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions,” Phys. Lett. B126, 41–45 (1983)

    work page 1983

  32. [32]

    Random disks of constant curvature: The lattice story,

    Frank Ferrari, “Random disks of constant curvature: The lattice story,” Phys. Rev. D113, 026012 (2026), arXiv:2406.06875 [hep-th] 53

    work page arXiv 2026

  33. [33]

    Classifying boundary condi- tions in JT gravity: from energy-branes toα-branes,

    Akash Goel, Luca V. Iliesiu, Jorrit Kruthoff, and Zhenbin Yang, “Classifying boundary condi- tions in JT gravity: from energy-branes toα-branes,” JHEP04, 069 (2021), arXiv:2010.12592 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    The Microcanonical functional integral. 1. The Gravitational field,

    J. David Brown and James W. York, Jr., “The Microcanonical functional integral. 1. The Gravitational field,” Phys. Rev. D47, 1420–1431 (1993), arXiv:gr-qc/9209014

    work page arXiv 1993

  35. [35]

    Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,

    Douglas Stanford and Edward Witten, “Fermionic Localization of the Schwarzian Theory,” JHEP10, 008 (2017), arXiv:1703.04612 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    2D dilaton-gravity, deforma- tions of the minimal string, and matrix models,

    Gustavo J. Turiaci, Mykhaylo Usatyuk, and Wayne W. Weng, “2D dilaton-gravity, deforma- tions of the minimal string, and matrix models,” Class. Quant. Grav.38, 204001 (2021), arXiv:2011.06038 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Instability of the Cauchy horizon of Reissner-Nordstrom black holes,

    Richard A. Matzner, Nelson Zamorano, and Vernon D. Sandberg, “Instability of the Cauchy horizon of Reissner-Nordstrom black holes,” Phys. Rev. D19, 2821–2826 (1979)

    work page 1979

  38. [38]

    Singularities and time-asymmetry,

    R. Penrose, “Singularities and time-asymmetry,” (1979) pp. 581–638

    work page 1979

  39. [39]

    Multi-Trace Operators, Boundary Conditions, And AdS/CFT Correspondence

    Edward Witten, “Multitrace operators, boundary conditions, and AdS / CFT correspondence,” (12 2001), arXiv:hep-th/0112258

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2001

  40. [40]

    The Holographic Weyl anomaly

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis, “The Holographic Weyl anomaly,” JHEP07, 023 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9806087

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  41. [41]

    A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity,

    Vijay Balasubramanian and Per Kraus, “A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys.208, 413–428 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9902121

    work page arXiv 1999

  42. [42]

    Holographic Reconstruction of Spacetime and Renormalization in the AdS/CFT Correspondence

    Sebastian de Haro, Sergey N. Solodukhin, and Kostas Skenderis, “Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,” Commun. Math. Phys. 217, 595–622 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0002230

    work page Pith review arXiv 2001

  43. [43]

    Lecture Notes on Holographic Renormalization

    Kostas Skenderis, “Lecture notes on holographic renormalization,” Class. Quant. Grav.19, 5849–5876 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0209067

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  44. [44]

    Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space

    Juan Maldacena, Douglas Stanford, and Zhenbin Yang, “Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space,” PTEP2016, 12C104 (2016), arXiv:1606.01857 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  45. [45]

    An Investigation of AdS$_2$ Backreaction and Holography

    Julius Engels¨ oy, Thomas G. Mertens, and Herman Verlinde, “An investigation of AdS 2 back- reaction and holography,” JHEP07, 139 (2016), arXiv:1606.03438 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    Black Holes and Random Matrices

    Jordan S. Cotler, Guy Gur-Ari, Masanori Hanada, Joseph Polchinski, Phil Saad, Stephen H. Shenker, Douglas Stanford, Alexandre Streicher, and Masaki Tezuka, “Black Holes and Random Matrices,” JHEP05, 118 (2017), [Erratum: JHEP 09, 002 (2018)], arXiv:1611.04650 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  47. [47]

    Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model as Liou- ville quantum mechanics,

    Dmitry Bagrets, Alexander Altland, and Alex Kamenev, “Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev model as Liou- ville quantum mechanics,” Nucl. Phys. B911, 191–205 (2016), arXiv:1607.00694 [cond-mat.str- el]

    work page arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Non-perturbative de Sitter Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,

    Jordan Cotler and Kristan Jensen, “Non-perturbative de Sitter Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,” JHEP12, 016 (2024), arXiv:2401.01925 [hep-th] 54

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [49]

    Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, and M. J. Perry, “Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,” Nucl. Phys. B138, 141–150 (1978)

    work page 1978

  50. [50]

    The phase of the sum over spheres,

    Joseph Polchinski, “The phase of the sum over spheres,” Phys. Lett. B219, 251–257 (1989)

    work page 1989

  51. [51]

    Physical instabilities and the phase of the Euclidean path integral,

    Victor Ivo, Juan Maldacena, and Zimo Sun, “Physical instabilities and the phase of the Eu- clidean path integral,” JHEP04, 118 (2026), arXiv:2504.00920 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Shi and G

    Xiaoyi Shi and Gustavo J. Turiaci, “The phase of the gravitational path integral,” JHEP07, 047 (2025), arXiv:2504.00900 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Maldacena, arXiv e-prints (2024), arXiv:2412.14014 [hep-th], arXiv:2412.14014 [hep-th]

    Juan Maldacena, “Real observers solving imaginary problems,” (12 2024), arXiv:2412.14014 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    On the phase of the de Sitter density of states,

    Yiming Chen, Douglas Stanford, Haifeng Tang, and Zhenbin Yang, “On the phase of the de Sitter density of states,” (11 2025), arXiv:2511.01400 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Matrix ensembles with global symme- tries and ’t Hooft anomalies from 2d gauge theory,

    Daniel Kapec, Raghu Mahajan, and Douglas Stanford, “Matrix ensembles with global symme- tries and ’t Hooft anomalies from 2d gauge theory,” JHEP04, 186 (2020), arXiv:1912.12285 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    On 2D gauge theories in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,

    Luca V. Iliesiu, “On 2D gauge theories in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,” (9 2019), arXiv:1909.05253 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Complex powers of an elliptic operator,

    R. T. Seeley, “Complex powers of an elliptic operator,” Proc. Symp. Pure Math.10, 288–307 (1967)

    work page 1967

  58. [58]

    R-torsion and the Laplacian on Riemannian manifolds,

    D. B. Ray and I. M. Singer, “R-torsion and the Laplacian on Riemannian manifolds,” Adv. Math.7, 145–210 (1971)

    work page 1971

  59. [59]

    On the eigenfunctions and on the eigenvalues of general elliptic boundary value problems,

    Shmuel Agmon, “On the eigenfunctions and on the eigenvalues of general elliptic boundary value problems,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math.15, 119–147 (1962)

    work page 1962

  60. [60]

    M. A. Shubin, Pseudodifferential Operators and Spectral Theory, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2001)

    work page 2001

  61. [61]

    Heat kernel expansion: user's manual

    D. V. Vassilevich, “Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,” Phys. Rept.388, 279–360 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0306138

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  62. [62]

    Gravitational Anomalies,

    Luis Alvarez-Gaume and Edward Witten, “Gravitational Anomalies,” Nucl. Phys. B234, 269 (1984)

    work page 1984

  63. [63]

    GLOBAL GRAVITATIONAL ANOMALIES,

    Edward Witten, “GLOBAL GRAVITATIONAL ANOMALIES,” Commun. Math. Phys.100, 197 (1985)

    work page 1985

  64. [64]

    The Chiral Fermion Determinant in the Schottky Parametrization,

    A. Losev, “The Chiral Fermion Determinant in the Schottky Parametrization,” JETP Lett. 49, 424–426 (1989)

    work page 1989

  65. [65]

    Eternal Black Holes in AdS

    Juan Martin Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP04, 021 (2003), arXiv:hep-th/0106112

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories (I)

    Guido Festuccia and Hong Liu, “Excursions beyond the horizon: Black hole singularities in Yang-Mills theories. I..” JHEP04, 044 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0506202 55

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  67. [67]

    Ali Ahmad, A

    Shadi Ali Ahmad, Ahmed Almheiri, and Simon Lin, “Continuing past the inner horizon using WKB,” (1 2026), arXiv:2601.02354 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,

    Daniel Louis Jafferis and Lampros Lamprou, “Inside the hologram: reconstructing the bulk observer’s experience,” JHEP03, 084 (2022), arXiv:2009.04476 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  69. [69]

    Seeing behind black hole horizons in SYK,

    Ping Gao and Lampros Lamprou, “Seeing behind black hole horizons in SYK,” JHEP06, 143 (2022), arXiv:2111.14010 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [70]

    Leutheusser and H

    Samuel Aaron Wehlau Leutheusser and Hong Liu, “Emergent Times in Holographic Duality,” Phys. Rev. D108, 086020 (2023), arXiv:2112.12156 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    The entropy of Hawking ra- diation,

    Ahmed Almheiri, Thomas Hartman, Juan Maldacena, Edgar Shaghoulian, and Amirhos- sein Tajdini, “The entropy of Hawking radiation,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035002 (2021), arXiv:2006.06872 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  72. [72]

    T Tand the black hole interior,

    Shadi Ali Ahmad, Ahmed Almheiri, and Simon Lin, “T Tand the black hole interior,” (3 2025), arXiv:2503.19854 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Steepest Descent Contours in the Path Integral Approach to Quantum Cosmology. 1. The De Sitter Minisuperspace Model,

    Jonathan J. Halliwell and Jorma Louko, “Steepest Descent Contours in the Path Integral Approach to Quantum Cosmology. 1. The De Sitter Minisuperspace Model,” Phys. Rev. D39, 2206 (1989)

    work page 1989

  74. [74]

    Steepest Descent Contours in the Path Integral Approach to Quantum Cosmology. 2. Microsuperspace,

    Jonathan J. Halliwell and Jorma Louko, “Steepest Descent Contours in the Path Integral Approach to Quantum Cosmology. 2. Microsuperspace,” Phys. Rev. D40, 1868 (1989)

    work page 1989

  75. [75]

    Integration Contours for the No Boundary Wave Function of the Universe,

    Jonathan J. Halliwell and James B. Hartle, “Integration Contours for the No Boundary Wave Function of the Universe,” Phys. Rev. D41, 1815 (1990)

    work page 1990

  76. [76]

    Anti-de Sitter fragmen- tation,

    Juan Martin Maldacena, Jeremy Michelson, and Andrew Strominger, “Anti-de Sitter fragmen- tation,” JHEP02, 011 (1999), arXiv:hep-th/9812073

    work page arXiv 1999

  77. [77]

    Models of AdS_2 Backreaction and Holography

    Ahmed Almheiri and Joseph Polchinski, “Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography,” JHEP 11, 014 (2015), arXiv:1402.6334 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    A universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories,

    Animik Ghosh, Henry Maxfield, and Gustavo J. Turiaci, “A universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories,” JHEP05, 104 (2020), arXiv:1912.07654 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  79. [79]

    Holography of 3d flat cosmological horizons,

    Arjun Bagchi, St´ ephane Detournay, Reza Fareghbal, and Joan Sim´ on, “Holography of 3d flat cosmological horizons,” Physical Review Letters110(Apr. 2013), ISSN 1079-7114,http:// dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.141302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.141302 2013

  80. [80]

    Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions

    Alexander Maloney and Edward Witten, “Quantum Gravity Partition Functions in Three Dimensions,” JHEP02, 029 (2010), arXiv:0712.0155 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

Showing first 80 references.