pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08490 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Antiferro-Chiral Phonons in mathcal{P}mathcal{T}-Symmetric Antiferromagnets

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords antiferro-chiral phononsPT-symmetric antiferromagnetsNéel vectorphonon angular momentummolecular Berry curvatureRaman-infrared hybridizationsublattice-staggered chirality
0
0 comments X

The pith

PT-symmetric antiferromagnets host antiferro-chiral phonons with vanishing total angular momentum but finite sublattice-staggered angular momentum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that antiferromagnets preserving the combined parity-time-reversal symmetry support phonon modes in which the two sublattices execute counter-rotating circular motions. These modes carry zero net angular momentum, as required by PT symmetry, yet possess a staggered angular momentum that is finite and opposite on the two sublattices. The staggered component arises because PT symmetry forbids net rotation while still allowing local chirality locked to the direction of the Néel vector. The hybridization occurs through a coupling between Raman and infrared phonons that is odd under separate P and T operations but even under their product, and this coupling is generated by molecular Berry curvature. A lattice model demonstrates the effect, showing that the staggered phonon angular momentum reverses when the Néel vector is reversed and thereby acts as a conjugate field to the antiferromagnetic order.

Core claim

In PT-symmetric antiferromagnets, phonon modes acquire antiferro-chiral character through a Néel-vector-locked hybridization of Raman and infrared-active phonons. The hybridization is microscopically induced by molecular Berry curvature, as illustrated in a prototype lattice model. The resulting normal modes carry zero total phonon angular momentum but finite staggered angular momentum on the inversion-related sublattices. This staggered quantity reverses sign upon reversal of the Néel vector and endows the modes with mixed Raman-infrared character, providing a lattice degree of freedom conjugate to compensated magnetic order.

What carries the argument

Néel-vector-locked coupling between Raman and infrared-active phonons generated by molecular Berry curvature, producing sublattice-staggered phonon angular momentum.

If this is right

  • The staggered phonon angular momentum functions as a conjugate field to the Néel vector.
  • Reversing the Néel vector reverses the sign of the staggered phonon chirality.
  • AFCPs acquire both Raman and infrared character through the hybridization.
  • These modes can serve as lattice-based probes of antiferromagnetic order.
  • Coherent excitation of AFCPs offers a possible route to dynamical control of the Néel vector.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same PT-enforced distinction between net and staggered angular momentum could be examined in other lattice excitations, such as magnons or polaritons, within PT-symmetric systems.
  • Spatially resolved or circularly polarized Raman and infrared measurements could isolate the staggered component without requiring net magnetization.
  • Inclusion of electron-phonon coupling in the lattice model would allow quantitative prediction of how AFCPs affect electronic properties near the antiferromagnetic transition.

Load-bearing premise

The molecular Berry curvature in a generic PT-symmetric antiferromagnet produces a hybridization strong enough to generate observable staggered angular momentum, and the prototype lattice model captures the essential physics without dominant competing effects.

What would settle it

A lattice-model calculation of phonon angular momentum that yields zero staggered component once the Berry curvature term is removed, or a spectroscopic measurement in a real PT-symmetric antiferromagnet that finds no counter-rotating local motion on opposite sublattices.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08490 by Randy Yeh, Sanjib Kumar Das, Yafei Ren.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Distorted buckled hexagonal lattice formed by two atomic layers with six atoms in an unit cell. The atoms in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Lowest-energy Raman and IR modes vs AFM ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Chiral phonons provide a route to couple lattice motion to magnetic order, but conventional chiral phonons carry a net angular momentum and thus couple naturally to net magnetization rather than to compensated N\'eel order. Here we show that $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$-symmetric antiferromagnets can host \emph{antiferro-chiral phonons} (AFCPs): phonon modes with vanishing total angular momentum but finite sublattice-staggered angular momentum. Symmetry enforces this distinction because $\mathcal{P}\mathcal{T}$ forbids a net phonon angular momentum while allowing counter-rotating local motion on inversion-related sublattices. AFCPs arise from a N\'eel-vector-locked coupling between Raman and infrared-active phonons. The coupling is odd under both $\mathcal{P}$ and $\mathcal{T}$ while preserving their product. Through this hybridization, the normal modes acquire both Raman and infrared character and carry a sublattice-staggered phonon angular momentum that acts as a conjugate field to the N\'eel vector. This coupling is microscopically generated by the molecular Berry curvature, which is demonstrated in a prototype lattice model. Reversing the N\'eel vector reverses the staggered phonon chirality. These results indicate AFCPs as probes of antiferromagnetic order and suggest coherent phonon excitation as a route to its dynamical control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes antiferro-chiral phonons (AFCPs) in PT-symmetric antiferromagnets: phonon modes with zero net angular momentum but finite staggered angular momentum on inversion-related sublattices. Symmetry (PT even, P and T odd) forbids net phonon angular momentum while permitting counter-rotating local motions. AFCPs arise via Neel-vector-locked hybridization of Raman- and IR-active phonons, microscopically generated by molecular Berry curvature. This is illustrated in a prototype lattice model, with the staggered chirality reversing upon Neel-vector reversal. The modes are positioned as probes and potential control handles for antiferromagnetic order.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work meaningfully extends chiral-phonon physics into compensated magnets by identifying a symmetry-protected channel that couples lattice angular momentum directly to Neel order rather than net magnetization. The prototype-model demonstration of the Berry-curvature mechanism supplies a concrete microscopic route, which is a strength. The result could stimulate experimental searches for staggered phonon chirality in PT-symmetric AFMs and motivate phonon-based dynamical control schemes, areas of current interest in spintronics and magnonics.

major comments (2)
  1. [prototype lattice model] Prototype lattice model section: the manuscript states that molecular Berry curvature generates the Raman-IR hybridization and the resulting staggered angular momentum, yet the explicit Hamiltonian, the form of the Berry curvature, and the computed sublattice-resolved phonon angular momentum are not shown. Without these, it is difficult to verify that the staggered moment is finite and of observable magnitude rather than an artifact of the minimal model choice.
  2. [symmetry analysis] Symmetry analysis: while the transformation properties (odd under P and T, even under PT) are invoked to allow the hybridization, the paper should explicitly tabulate how the Raman and IR phonon operators transform under each symmetry operation and confirm that only the Neel-locked term survives. This would make the selection-rule argument fully self-contained.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract/introduction] The abstract and introduction use the term 'molecular Berry curvature' without a brief definition or reference to its prior usage in phonon contexts; a short clarifying sentence would improve accessibility.
  2. [figures] Figure captions (if present) should state the numerical values of the staggered angular momentum obtained from the lattice model so readers can judge its scale relative to typical phonon frequencies.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We appreciate the positive assessment of the significance of antiferro-chiral phonons in PT-symmetric antiferromagnets. Below we address each major comment in turn and indicate the revisions we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Prototype lattice model section: the manuscript states that molecular Berry curvature generates the Raman-IR hybridization and the resulting staggered angular momentum, yet the explicit Hamiltonian, the form of the Berry curvature, and the computed sublattice-resolved phonon angular momentum are not shown. Without these, it is difficult to verify that the staggered moment is finite and of observable magnitude rather than an artifact of the minimal model choice.

    Authors: We agree that the explicit details of the prototype lattice model are necessary for full verification. In the revised manuscript we will include the explicit Hamiltonian, the functional form of the molecular Berry curvature, and the computed values of the sublattice-resolved phonon angular momentum. These additions will confirm that the staggered angular momentum is finite, arises directly from the Berry-curvature mechanism, and is not an artifact of the minimal-model choice. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Symmetry analysis: while the transformation properties (odd under P and T, even under PT) are invoked to allow the hybridization, the paper should explicitly tabulate how the Raman and IR phonon operators transform under each symmetry operation and confirm that only the Neel-locked term survives. This would make the selection-rule argument fully self-contained.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. To render the symmetry analysis fully self-contained, the revised manuscript will contain an explicit table listing the transformation properties of the Raman and IR phonon operators under P, T, and PT. The table will demonstrate that only the Neel-vector-locked hybridization term is symmetry-allowed, thereby confirming the selection rules. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives AFCPs from PT symmetry properties that forbid net phonon angular momentum while permitting staggered counter-rotating motion on inversion-related sublattices, with the Neel-vector-locked Raman-IR hybridization following directly from the stated transformation properties (odd under P and T, even under PT). The microscopic generation by molecular Berry curvature is shown via explicit construction and computation in a prototype lattice model, where the curvature is obtained from the model's Hamiltonian in the standard manner for such demonstrations. This constitutes independent content rather than a reduction of the final result to fitted inputs, self-citations, or definitional equivalence. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are present. The derivation chain is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on (1) the existence of PT-symmetric antiferromagnets, (2) the definition of molecular Berry curvature for phonons, and (3) the assumption that Raman and IR modes can hybridize under the stated selection rules. No free parameters are explicitly named in the abstract; the lattice model is described only as 'prototype'.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption PT symmetry is preserved while P and T are individually broken
    Invoked to forbid net phonon angular momentum while allowing staggered angular momentum.
  • domain assumption Molecular Berry curvature generates the Raman-IR phonon coupling
    Stated as the microscopic origin in the prototype model.
invented entities (1)
  • antiferro-chiral phonons (AFCPs) no independent evidence
    purpose: Phonon modes carrying sublattice-staggered angular momentum conjugate to the Neel vector
    New name and concept introduced to describe the staggered chirality; no independent experimental signature is given beyond the model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1518 out tokens · 40983 ms · 2026-05-13T01:08:47.207839+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E. V. Gomonay and V. M. Loktev, Spintronics of anti- ferromagnetic systems (review article), Low Temp. Phys. 40, 17–35 (2014)

  2. [2]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

  3. [3]

    ˇZelezn´ y, P

    J. ˇZelezn´ y, P. Wadley, K. Olejn´ ık, A. Hoffmann, and H. Ohno, Spin transport and spin torque in antiferro- magnetic devices, Nat. Phys.14, 220–228 (2018)

  4. [4]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

  5. [5]

    J. Han, R. Cheng, L. Liu, H. Ohno, and S. Fukami, Coherent antiferromagnetic spintronics, Nat. Mater.22, 684–695 (2023)

  6. [6]

    Ren´ e, A

    S. Ren´ e, A. Levchuk, A. Abdelsamie, Z. Li, P. Dufour, A. Chaudron, F. Godel, P. Gemeiner, B. Dkhil, J.-B. Moussy, K. Bouzehouane, S. Fusil, V. Garcia, M. Viret, and J.-Y. Chauleau, Terahertz antiferromagnetic dynam- ics induced by ultrafast spin currents, Sci. Adv.11, 1107 (2025)

  7. [7]

    Wadley, B

    P. Wadley, B. Howells, J. ˇZelezn´ y, C. Andrews, V. Hills, R. P. Campion, V. Nov´ ak, K. Olejn´ ık, F. Maccherozzi, S. S. Dhesi, S. Y. Martin, T. Wagner, J. Wunderlich, F. Freimuth, Y. Mokrousov, J. Kuneˇ s, J. S. Chauhan, M. J. Grzybowski, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, B. L. Gallagher, and T. Jungwirth, Electrical switching of an antiferromagnet, Scie...

  8. [8]

    Moriyama, K

    T. Moriyama, K. Oda, T. Ohkochi, M. Kimata, and T. Ono, Spin torque control of antiferromagnetic mo- ments in NiO, Sci. Rep.8, 14167 (2018)

  9. [9]

    C. C. Chiang, S. Y. Huang, D. Qu, P. H. Wu, and C. L. Chien, Absence of Evidence of Electrical Switching of the Antiferromagnetic N´ eel Vector, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 227203 (2019)

  10. [10]

    S.-Y. Chen, C. Zheng, M. S. Fuhrer, and J. Yan, Helicity- Resolved Raman Scattering of MoS 2, MoSe 2, WS 2, and WSe2 Atomic Layers, Nano Lett.15, 2526–2532 (2015). 6

  11. [11]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Chiral Phonons at High-Symmetry Points in Monolayer Hexagonal Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 115502 (2015)

  12. [12]

    H. Zhu, J. Yi, M.-Y. Li, J. Xiao, L. Zhang, C.-W. Yang, R. A. Kaindl, L.-J. Li, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Obser- vation of chiral phonons, Science359, 579–582 (2018)

  13. [13]

    Ishito, H

    K. Ishito, H. Mao, Y. Kousaka, Y. Togawa, S. Iwasaki, T. Zhang, S. Murakami, J.-i. Kishine, and T. Satoh, Truly chiral phonons inα-HgS, Nat. Phys.19, 35–39 (2022)

  14. [14]

    H. Ueda, M. Garc´ ıa-Fern´ andez, S. Agrestini, C. P. Ro- mao, J. van den Brink, N. A. Spaldin, K.-J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in quartz probed by x-rays, Nature618, 946–950 (2023)

  15. [15]

    H. Ueda, A. Nag, C. P. Romao, M. Garc´ ıa-Fern´ andez, K.- J. Zhou, and U. Staub, Chiral phonons in polar LiNbO 3 (2025), arXiv:2504.03330

  16. [16]

    Y. Yang, Z. Xiao, Y. Mao, Z. Li, Z. Wang, T. Deng, Y. Tang, Z.-D. Song, Y. Li, H. Yuan, M. Shi, and Y. Xu, Symmetry-guided catalogue of chiral phonon materials, Nat. Phys.22, 03260 (2026)

  17. [17]

    D. M. Juraschek, R. M. Geilhufe, H. Zhu, M. Basini, P. Baum, A. Baydin, S. Chaudhary, M. Fechner, B. Fle- bus, G. Grissonnanche, A. I. Kirilyuk, M. Lemeshko, S. F. Maehrlein, M. Mignolet, S. Murakami, Q. Niu, U. Nowak, C. P. Romao, H. Rostami, T. Satoh, N. A. Spaldin, H. Ueda, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons, Nat. Phys.21, 1532–1540 (2025)

  18. [18]

    F. Wang, J. Xu, X. Liu, H. Wang, L. Zhang, and H. Zhang, Alteraxial phonons in collinear magnets (2025), arXiv:2512.07518

  19. [19]

    Zhang, Z

    T. Zhang, Z. Huang, Z. Pan, L. Du, G. Zhang, and S. Mu- rakami, Weyl phonons in chiral crystals, Nano Lett.23, 7561 (2023)

  20. [20]

    B. Ma, Z. D. Wang, and G. v. Chen, Chiral Phonons Induced from Spin Dynamics via Magnetoelas- tic Anisotropy, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 246604 (2024)

  21. [22]

    M. Che, J. Liang, Y. Cui, H. Li, B. Lu, W. Sang, X. Li, X. Dong, L. Zhao, S. Zhang, T. Sun, W. Jiang, E. Liu, F. Jin, T. Zhang, and L. Yang, Magnetic Or- der Induced Chiral Phonons in a Ferromagnetic Weyl Semimetal, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196906 (2025)

  22. [23]

    Zhang and Q

    L. Zhang and Q. Niu, Angular Momentum of Phonons and the Einstein–de Haas Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 085503 (2014)

  23. [24]

    Streib, Difference between angular momentum and pseudoangular momentum, Phys

    S. Streib, Difference between angular momentum and pseudoangular momentum, Phys. Rev. B103, L100409 (2021)

  24. [25]

    Zhang and S

    T. Zhang and S. Murakami, Chiral phonons and pseu- doangular momentum in nonsymmorphic systems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, L012024 (2022)

  25. [26]

    T. Wang, H. Sun, X. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons: Prediction, verification, and application, Nano Lett.24, 4311 (2024)

  26. [27]

    Y. Chen, W. Qin, S. Zhang, P. Cui, Q. Niu, and Z. Zhang, Emergence of Chiral Phonons in Two- Dimensional Kagome Lattices Harboring Electronic Chi- rality, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 126608 (2025)

  27. [28]

    Strohm, G

    C. Strohm, G. L. J. A. Rikken, and P. Wyder, Phe- nomenological Evidence for the Phonon Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 155901 (2005)

  28. [29]

    Zhang, J

    L. Zhang, J. Ren, J.-S. Wang, and B. Li, Topological Nature of the Phonon Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 225901 (2010)

  29. [30]

    T. Qin, J. Zhou, and J. Shi, Berry curvature and the phonon Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B86, 104305 (2012)

  30. [31]

    Liu, C.-S

    Y. Liu, C.-S. Lian, Y. Li, Y. Xu, and W. Duan, Pseu- dospins and Topological Effects of Phonons in a Kekul´ e Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 255901 (2017)

  31. [32]

    X. Li, B. Fauqu´ e, Z. Zhu, and K. Behnia, Phonon Ther- mal Hall Effect in Strontium Titanate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 105901 (2020)

  32. [33]

    Park and B.-J

    S. Park and B.-J. Yang, Phonon Angular Momentum Hall Effect, Nano Lett.20, 7694–7699 (2020)

  33. [34]

    K. Sun, Z. Gao, and J.-S. Wang, Phonon Hall effect with first-principles calculations, Phys. Rev. B103, 214301 (2021)

  34. [35]

    Oh and N

    T. Oh and N. Nagaosa, Phonon Thermal Hall Effect in Mott Insulators via Skew Scattering by the Scalar Spin Chirality, Phys. Rev. X15, 011036 (2025)

  35. [36]

    K. Kim, E. Vetter, L. Yan, C. Yang, Z. Wang, R. Sun, Y. Yang, A. H. Comstock, X. Li, J. Zhou, L. Zhang, W. You, D. Sun, and J. Liu, Chiral-phonon-activated spin Seebeck effect, Nat. Mater.22, 322–328 (2023)

  36. [37]

    S. Yang, Y. Yu, F. Sui, R. Ge, R. Jin, B. Liu, Y. Chen, R. Qi, and F. Yue, Chiral Phonon, Valley Polarization, and Inter/Intravalley Scattering in a van der Waals ReSe2 Semiconductor, ACS Nano18, 33754–33764 (2024)

  37. [38]

    Weißenhofer, P

    M. Weißenhofer, P. Rieger, M. S. Mrudul, L. Mikadze, U. Nowak, and P. M. Oppeneer, Chiral Phonons Aris- ing from Chirality-Selective Magnon-Phonon Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 216701 (2025)

  38. [39]

    H. Chen, W. Zhang, Q. Niu, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons in two-dimensional materials, 2D Mater.6, 012002 (2018)

  39. [40]

    H. Chen, W. Wu, S. A. Yang, X. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons in kagome lattices, Phys. Rev. B100, 094303 (2019)

  40. [41]

    A. Ptok, A. Kobia lka, M. Sternik, J. La˙ zewski, P. T. Jochym, A. M. Ole´ s, S. Stankov, and P. Piekarz, Chiral phonons in the honeycomb sublattice of layered CoSn- like compounds, Phys. Rev. B104, 054305 (2021)

  41. [42]

    H. Chen, H. Wang, H. Li, and L. Zhang, Chiral phonons induced by adsorption on graphene, Phys. Rev. B110, 184301 (2024)

  42. [43]

    S. Ren, J. Bonini, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and D. Vanderbilt, Adiabatic dynamics of coupled spins and phonons in magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. X14, 011041 (2024)

  43. [44]

    D. M. Juraschek and N. A. Spaldin, Orbital magnetic mo- ments of phonons, Phys. Rev. Mater.3, 064405 (2019)

  44. [45]

    J. Luo, T. Lin, J. Zhang, X. Chen, E. R. Blackert, R. Xu, B. I. Yakobson, and H. Zhu, Large effective magnetic fields from chiral phonons in rare-earth halides, Science 382, 698–702 (2023)

  45. [46]

    Bonini, S

    J. Bonini, S. Ren, D. Vanderbilt, M. Stengel, C. E. Dreyer, and S. Coh, Frequency Splitting of Chiral Phonons from Broken Time-Reversal Symmetry in CrI 3, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 086701 (2023)

  46. [47]

    F. Wu, J. Zhou, S. Bao, L. Li, J. Wen, Y. Wan, and Q. Zhang, Magnetic Switching of Phonon Angular Mo- mentum in a Ferrimagnetic Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 236701 (2025)

  47. [48]

    Yang, Y.-Y

    R. Yang, Y.-Y. Zhu, M. Steigleder, Y.-C. Liu, C.-C. Liu, 7 X.-G. Qiu, T. Zhang, and M. Dressel, Inherent Circu- lar Dichroism of Phonons in Magnetic Weyl Semimetal Co3Sn2S2, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 196905 (2025)

  48. [49]

    T. F. Nova, A. Cartella, A. Cantaluppi, M. F¨ orst, D. Bossini, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, An effective magnetic field from opti- cally driven phonons, Nat. Phys.13, 132–136 (2016)

  49. [50]

    Y. Ren, C. Xiao, D. Saparov, and Q. Niu, Phonon Mag- netic Moment from Electronic Topological Magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186403 (2021)

  50. [51]

    D. M. Juraschek, T. c. v. Neuman, and P. Narang, Gi- ant effective magnetic fields from optically driven chiral phonons in 4fparamagnets, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013129 (2022)

  51. [52]

    R. M. Geilhufe and W. Hergert, Electron magnetic mo- ment of transient chiral phonons in KTaO 3, Phys. Rev. B107, L020406 (2023)

  52. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    X.-W. Zhang, Y. Ren, C. Wang, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Gate-Tunable Phonon Magnetic Moment in Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 226302 (2023)

  53. [54]

    Chaudhary, D

    S. Chaudhary, D. M. Juraschek, M. Rodriguez-Vega, and G. A. Fiete, Giant effective magnetic moments of chiral phonons from orbit-lattice coupling, Phys. Rev. B110, 094401 (2024)

  54. [55]

    D. Yao, D. Go, Y. Mokrousov, and S. Murakami, Dy- namical orbital angular momentum induced by circularly polarized phonons (2025), arXiv:2511.09271

  55. [56]

    Coh, Classification of materials with phonon angular momentum and microscopic origin of angular momen- tum, Phys

    S. Coh, Classification of materials with phonon angular momentum and microscopic origin of angular momen- tum, Phys. Rev. B108, 134307 (2023)

  56. [57]

    C. A. Mead and D. G. Truhlar, On the determination of Born–Oppenheimer nuclear motion wave functions in- cluding complications due to conical intersections and identical nuclei, J. Chem. Phys.70, 2284–2296 (1979)

  57. [58]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

  58. [59]

    Saparov, B

    D. Saparov, B. Xiong, Y. Ren, and Q. Niu, Lattice dy- namics with molecular Berry curvature: Chiral optical phonons, Phys. Rev. B105, 064303 (2022)

  59. [60]

    Y. Ren, D. Saparov, and Q. Niu, Nonreciprocal Phonons inPT-Symmetric Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 206701 (2025)

  60. [61]

    See Supplemental Material for detailed calculations of the lattice dynamics, molecular Berry curvature, symmetry transformation of the AFCP modes, and rigorous proofs of the symmetry constraints on the gyroscopic coupling

  61. [62]

    J. Wu, Y. Yao, M.-L. Lin, M. R¨ osner, Z. Du, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P.-H. Tan, S. Haas, and H. Wang, Spin–phonon coupling in ferromagnetic mono- layer chromium tribromide, Adv. Mater.34, 2108506 (2022)

  62. [63]

    Zhang, H

    G. Zhang, H. Wu, L. Yang, W. Jin, B. Xiao, W. Zhang, and H. Chang, Lattice Vibration, Raman Modes and Room-Temperature Spin-Phonon Coupling in Intrin- sic Two-Dimensional van der Waals Ferromagnetic Fe3GaTe2, ACS Mater. Lett.7, 1289 (2025)

  63. [64]

    Kargar, E

    F. Kargar, E. A. Coleman, S. Ghosh, J. Lee, M. J. Gomez, Y. Liu, A. S. Magana, Z. Barani, A. Moham- madzadeh, B. Debnath, R. B. Wilson, R. K. Lake, and A. A. Balandin, Phonon and Thermal Properties of Quasi-Two-Dimensional FePS 3 and MnPS 3 Antifer- romagnetic Semiconductors, ACS Nano14, 2424 (2020)

  64. [65]

    J. Cui, E. V. Bostr¨ om, M. Ozerov, F. Wu, Q. Jiang, J.- H. Chu, C. Li, F. Liu, X. Xu, A. Rubio, and Q. Zhang, Chirality selective magnon–phonon hybridization and magnon-induced chiral phonons in a layered zigzag an- tiferromagnet, Nat. Commun.14, 39123 (2023)

  65. [66]

    Dixit, Y

    B. Dixit, Y. Yang, S. Li, Y.-C. Chen, Q. Jia, and J.-P. Wang, 2d magnetic and topological quantum materials and devices for ultralow power spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.36, 2528026 (2026)