pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08617 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.comp-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Path Dependence in Alchemical Calculations of Water Chemical Potential in Aqueous Electrolytes

Amir Haji-Akbari, Arlind Kacirani, Bet\"ul Uralcan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 00:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.stat-mechphysics.comp-ph
keywords alchemical insertionchemical potentialaqueous electrolytespath dependencevan der Waals interactionselectrostatic couplingKCl solutionsfree energy calculations
0
0 comments X

The pith

The order in which van der Waals and electrostatic interactions are activated during water insertion affects the computed chemical potential in aqueous salt solutions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether the free energy of inserting a water molecule into KCl solutions depends on the sequence used to turn on its interactions with the surroundings. It tests eight distinct alchemical pathways that differ in when short-range repulsions and long-range attractions are coupled. Some pathways produce free-energy values that are chemically implausible because the inserted water forms unrealistically strong attractions to chloride ions in intermediate stages. A reader would care because these insertion calculations are used to judge the thermodynamic behavior of electrolytes, and unreliable numbers could lead to incorrect predictions of stability or solubility. Pathways that establish short-range repulsions before electrostatic attractions avoid the artifacts and give consistent results across different staging choices.

Core claim

Although the insertion free energy of water should be independent of the alchemical pathway in principle, calculations in aqueous KCl show strong dependence on the order and extent of coupling van der Waals and Coulombic interactions. Concurrent or partially end-coupled protocols generate anomalous, implausible values that originate from intermediate states in which the inserted water molecule experiences strong electrostatic attraction to a chloride ion before adequate short-range repulsion is present. Protocols that activate short-range van der Waals interactions before electrostatics produce consistent and chemically reasonable estimates, demonstrating that practical alchemical protocols

What carries the argument

Staged particle-insertion alchemical protocols that vary the sequence of activating short-range van der Waals repulsions and long-range electrostatic attractions for an inserted water molecule.

If this is right

  • Concurrent activation of van der Waals and electrostatic interactions can produce chemically implausible insertion free energies.
  • Activating short-range van der Waals interactions before electrostatics yields consistent and plausible estimates.
  • The chemical potential of water in ionic solutions is practically sensitive to the staging of interactions in alchemical protocols.
  • Decoupling short-range repulsions from electrostatic attractions is required for reliable staged-insertion calculations in polar and charged environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pathway sensitivity is likely to appear when computing solvation free energies of other small molecules or ions in electrolyte solutions.
  • Simulation protocols for charged systems should routinely compare results from at least two distinct staging orders to detect hidden artifacts.
  • The findings suggest that similar decoupling strategies could improve convergence in alchemical transformations involving charged species or polar solvents.
  • Free-energy calculations in complex media may require explicit validation against multiple insertion sequences before the results are treated as pathway-independent.

Load-bearing premise

The inconsistencies in the computed free energies are caused by the choice of alchemical pathway rather than by insufficient sampling, force-field errors, or finite-size effects.

What would settle it

Repeating the anomalous pathways with substantially longer simulations or enhanced sampling methods and finding that all pathways converge to the same free-energy value would show that the discrepancies are not inherent to the pathway design.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08617 by Amir Haji-Akbari, Arlind Kacirani, Bet\"ul Uralcan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Hydrogen bond autocorrelation function, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Schematic representation of paths with different coupling protocols within the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Water excess chemical potential, i.e., excess insertion free energy, obtained from paths with different coupling protocols. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (A) Minimum oxygen–ion distance, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Violin-plot comparison of water insertion free en [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Comparison of forward and reverse integration along [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate calculation of free energies and their derivatives is central to assessing the thermodynamic stability of molecular and particulate systems across length scales. Yet such quantities can be difficult to compute reliably in strongly interacting systems, such as solutions of ionic species in polar solvents. One important example is the chemical potential of water in aqueous electrolytes, which can be estimated through staged particle insertion by gradually coupling an inserted molecule to its environment. Although the resulting insertion free energy should be independent of the alchemical pathway, the order and manner in which van der Waals and electrostatic interactions are activated can strongly affect convergence and, in some cases, yield inconsistent estimates. Here, we examine this issue by calculating water's chemical potential in aqueous KCl solutions using eight alchemical insertion pathways that differ in the extent and order of van der Waals and Coulombic coupling. We find that concurrently activating these interactions, particularly in fully coupled and partially end-coupled protocols, can produce chemically implausible insertion free energies. These anomalies arise from intermediate states in which the inserted water molecule develops strong electrostatic interactions with a chloride ion before sufficient short-range repulsion has been established. In contrast, pathways that activate short-range van der Waals interactions before electrostatics yield more consistent and chemically plausible estimates. These findings demonstrate that practical alchemical calculations in polar and ionic environments can be highly sensitive to pathway design, underscoring the importance of decoupling short-range and electrostatic interactions in staged insertion alchemical protocols.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines path dependence in alchemical free-energy calculations of the chemical potential of water in aqueous KCl solutions. By comparing eight staged-insertion pathways that differ in the order and extent of van der Waals versus electrostatic coupling, the authors report that protocols activating short-range repulsion before electrostatics produce consistent, chemically plausible insertion free energies, while concurrent or electrostatic-first pathways yield implausible values. These anomalies are attributed to intermediate lambda states in which the inserted water forms strong attractions to chloride ions before sufficient short-range repulsion is established.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated with adequate convergence diagnostics, the work would be significant for the field of computational physical chemistry. It provides concrete evidence that alchemical pathway design can introduce artifacts in polar/ionic systems and offers practical guidance on decoupling short-range and electrostatic interactions. The systematic comparison of eight pathways is a methodological strength; however, the absence of error bars, overlap metrics, or sampling diagnostics currently limits the strength of the conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that electrostatic-first pathways produce 'chemically implausible insertion free energies' is central to the argument yet is presented without numerical values, uncertainties, or comparison to reference data (e.g., experimental or independent simulation results), making it impossible to judge the magnitude or statistical significance of the reported anomalies.
  2. [Results] Results (pathway comparison): The attribution of inconsistencies specifically to intermediate-state artifacts (strong water-Cl- electrostatics before repulsion) cannot be distinguished from inadequate sampling of high-energy barriers, because no overlap matrices, forward/reverse work histograms, lambda-window convergence tests, or autocorrelation times are reported; these diagnostics are load-bearing for the claim that the observed path dependence is physical rather than numerical.
  3. [Methods] Methods: Finite-size corrections, system-size dependence, and the precise lambda schedules (including number of windows and soft-core parameters) are not detailed; without these, it is unclear whether the reported differences arise from pathway ordering or from other simulation limitations such as periodic-boundary artifacts in the electrolyte.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'concurrently activating these interactions, particularly in fully coupled and partially end-coupled protocols' is ambiguous; explicit enumeration of which of the eight pathways fall into each category would improve clarity.
  2. [Results] The manuscript would benefit from a table summarizing the eight pathways (coupling order, lambda points, and resulting free energies with uncertainties) to allow direct comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to enhance its clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that electrostatic-first pathways produce 'chemically implausible insertion free energies' is central to the argument yet is presented without numerical values, uncertainties, or comparison to reference data (e.g., experimental or independent simulation results), making it impossible to judge the magnitude or statistical significance of the reported anomalies.

    Authors: We agree that including numerical values and uncertainties would strengthen the abstract. In the revised version, we will incorporate specific examples of the insertion free energies obtained from the different pathways, including their statistical uncertainties. For context, we will also reference independent simulation results from the literature on water chemical potentials in electrolytes to illustrate the expected range and magnitude of the observed anomalies. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results (pathway comparison): The attribution of inconsistencies specifically to intermediate-state artifacts (strong water-Cl- electrostatics before repulsion) cannot be distinguished from inadequate sampling of high-energy barriers, because no overlap matrices, forward/reverse work histograms, lambda-window convergence tests, or autocorrelation times are reported; these diagnostics are load-bearing for the claim that the observed path dependence is physical rather than numerical.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the lack of these diagnostics in the original submission makes it difficult to fully rule out sampling issues. However, the fact that several pathways yield mutually consistent results while others do not, and that the anomalous results correlate with the presence of unphysical intermediate states, supports our physical interpretation. To address this, we will include overlap matrices, forward/reverse histograms, and autocorrelation times in the revised manuscript to demonstrate adequate sampling in the well-behaved pathways. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods] Methods: Finite-size corrections, system-size dependence, and the precise lambda schedules (including number of windows and soft-core parameters) are not detailed; without these, it is unclear whether the reported differences arise from pathway ordering or from other simulation limitations such as periodic-boundary artifacts in the electrolyte.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting these omissions. The revised Methods section will provide full details on the lambda schedules, including the number of windows and soft-core parameters for each stage, as well as the system sizes employed and any finite-size corrections applied. We will clarify that the path dependence is observed consistently across our simulation setups, indicating it is not due to periodic-boundary artifacts in the electrolyte. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical simulation results with no self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper reports numerical outcomes from molecular dynamics simulations of eight alchemical insertion pathways for water chemical potential in KCl solutions. No equations or derivations are presented that reduce a claimed prediction or first-principles result to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or prior self-citations by construction. The central observation—that certain pathways produce implausible free energies due to intermediate-state artifacts—is an empirical finding from direct computation, not a closed mathematical loop. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks (standard alchemical theory and MD sampling diagnostics) and contains no load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatz smuggling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard molecular-dynamics and statistical-mechanics assumptions rather than new postulates; the main added value is the empirical comparison of coupling protocols.

free parameters (1)
  • alchemical coupling schedule
    The eight distinct orders and extents of van der Waals versus electrostatic activation are chosen by the authors; these are protocol parameters, not data-fitted constants.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The true insertion free energy is independent of the alchemical pathway provided sampling is sufficient and the end states are identical.
    Invoked implicitly when the authors interpret differences across pathways as artifacts rather than physical results.
  • domain assumption Standard force fields and periodic boundary conditions adequately represent aqueous KCl solutions for the purpose of detecting pathway-dependent artifacts.
    Required for the simulations to be meaningful; no new force-field development is described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5577 in / 1397 out tokens · 57684 ms · 2026-05-12T00:49:57.311357+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. G. Kirkwood, Statistical mechanics of fluid mixtures, J. Chem. Phys.3, 300 (1935)

  2. [2]

    C. H. Bennett, Efficient estimation of free energy differ- ences from Monte Carlo data, J. Comput. Phys.22, 245 (1976)

  3. [3]

    Romano and K

    S. Romano and K. Singer, Calculation of the entropy of liquid chlorine and bromine by computer simulation, Mol. Phys.37, 1765 (1979)

  4. [4]

    Frenkel and A

    D. Frenkel and A. J. Ladd, New monte carlo method to compute the free energy of arbitrary solids. application to the fcc and hcp phases of hard spheres, J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3188 (1984)

  5. [5]

    Frenkel, Stability of the high-pressure body-centered- cubic phase of helium, Phys

    D. Frenkel, Stability of the high-pressure body-centered- cubic phase of helium, Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 858 (1986)

  6. [6]

    B. A. Berg and T. Neuhaus, Multicanonical ensemble: A new approach to simulate first-order phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 9 (1992)

  7. [7]

    Orkoulas and A

    G. Orkoulas and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Free energy and phase equilibria for the restricted primitive model of ionic fluids from monte carlo simulations, J. Chem. Phys.101, 1452 (1994)

  8. [8]

    Wang and D

    F. Wang and D. P. Landau, Efficient, multiple-range ran- dom walk algorithm to calculate the density of states, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2050 (2001)

  9. [9]

    Haji-Akbari, M

    A. Haji-Akbari, M. Engel, and S. C. Glotzer, Phase di- agram of hard tetrahedra, J. Chem. Phys.135, 194101 (2011)

  10. [10]

    Espinosa, C

    J. Espinosa, C. Vega, and E. Sanz, The mold integration method for the calculation of the crystal-fluid interfacial free energy from simulations, J. Chem. Phys.141, 134709 (2014)

  11. [11]

    Thapar and F

    V. Thapar and F. A. Escobedo, Simultaneous estimation of free energies and rates using forward flux sampling and mean first passage times, J. Chem. Phys.143, 244113 (2015)

  12. [12]

    Sulantay Vargas, S

    F. Sulantay Vargas, S. Hussain, and A. Haji-Akbari, Ro- bustness of classical nucleation theory to chemical hetero- geneity of crystal nucleating substrates, Cryst. Growth Des.26, 1943 (2026)

  13. [13]

    Pohorille, C

    A. Pohorille, C. Jarzynski, and C. Chipot, Good practices in free-energy calculations, J. Phys. Chem. B114, 10235 (2010)

  14. [14]

    M. R. Shirts and D. L. Mobley, An introduction to best practices in free energy calculations, Methods Mol. Biol. 924, 271 (2013)

  15. [15]

    Hansen and W

    N. Hansen and W. F. Van Gunsteren, Practical Aspects of Free-Energy Calculations: A Review, J. Chem. Theory Comput.10, 2632 (2014)

  16. [16]

    P. V. Klimovich, M. R. Shirts, and D. L. Mobley, Guide- lines for the analysis of free energy calculations, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des.29, 397 (2015)

  17. [17]

    P. V. Klimovich and D. L. Mobley, A Python tool to set up relative free energy calculations in GROMACS, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des.29, 1007 (2015)

  18. [18]

    Hummer, L

    G. Hummer, L. R. Pratt, and A. E. Garcia, Free energy of ionic hydration, J. Phys. Chem.100, 1206 (1996)

  19. [19]

    Boresch, F

    S. Boresch, F. Tettinger, M. Leitgeb, and M. Karplus, Absolute binding free energies: a quantitative approach 10 for their calculation, J. Phys. Chem. B107, 9535 (2003)

  20. [20]

    J. C. Palmer, F. Martelli, Y. Liu, R. Car, A. Z. Pana- giotopoulos, and P. G. Debenedetti, Metastable liquid– liquid transition in a molecular model of water, Nature 510, 385 (2014)

  21. [21]

    the putative liquid-liquid transition is a liquid-solid transition in atomistic models of water

    J. C. Palmer, A. Haji-Akbari, R. S. Singh, F. Martelli, R. Car, A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, and P. G. Debenedetti, Comment on “the putative liquid-liquid transition is a liquid-solid transition in atomistic models of water”[i and ii: J. chem. phys. 135, 134503 (2011); j. chem. phys. 138, 214504 (2013)], J. Chem. Phys.148, 137101 (2018)

  22. [22]

    S. H. Saravi and A. Z. Panagiotopoulos, Individual ion activity coefficients in aqueous electrolytes from explicit- water molecular dynamics simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B 125, 8511 (2021)

  23. [23]

    Kacirani, B

    A. Kacirani, B. Uralcan, T. S. Domingues, and A. Haji- Akbari, Effect of Pressure on the Conformational Land- scape of HumanγD-Crystallin from Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B128, 4931 (2024)

  24. [24]

    D. L. Beveridge and F. M. DiCapua, Free energy via molecular simulation: applications to chemical and biomolecular systems, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem.18, 431 (1989)

  25. [25]

    J. W. Pitera and W. F. Van Gunsteren, A Comparison of Non-Bonded Scaling Approaches for Free Energy Cal- culations, Mol. Simul.28, 45 (2002)

  26. [26]

    R. W. Zwanzig, E. G. Rauh, and R. J. Thorn, High- Temperature Equation of State by a Perturbation Method. I. Nonpolar Gases, J. Chem. Phys.22, 1420 (1954)

  27. [27]

    Resat and M

    H. Resat and M. Mezei, Studies on free energy calcula- tions. I. Thermodynamic integration using a polynomial path, J. Chem. Phys.99, 6052 (1993)

  28. [28]

    Jorge, N

    M. Jorge, N. M. Garrido, A. J. Queimada, I. G. Economou, and E. A. MacEdo, Effect of the integration method on the accuracy and computational efficiency of free energy calculations using thermodynamic integra- tion, J. Chem. Theory Comput.6, 1018 (2010)

  29. [29]

    A. M. Ferrenberg and R. H. Swendsen, Optimized Monte Carlo data analysis, Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 1195 (1989)

  30. [30]

    M. R. Shirts and J. D. Chodera, Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states, J. Chem. Phys.129, 124105 (2008)

  31. [31]

    T. Koop, B. Luo, A. Tsias, and T. Peter, Water activ- ity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature406, 611 (2000)

  32. [32]

    Luo and B

    Y. Luo and B. Roux, Simulation of osmotic pressure in concentrated aqueous salt solutions, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 183 (2010)

  33. [33]

    Sauter and A

    J. Sauter and A. Grafm¨ uller, Predicting the chemical po- tential and osmotic pressure of polysaccharide solutions by molecular simulations, J. Chem. Theory Comput.12, 4375 (2016)

  34. [34]

    J. R. Espinosa, G. D. Soria, J. Ramirez, C. Valeriani, C. Vega, and E. Sanz, Role of salt, pressure, and water activity on homogeneous ice nucleation, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.8, 4486 (2017)

  35. [35]

    Widom, Some Topics in the Theory of Fluids, J

    B. Widom, Some Topics in the Theory of Fluids, J. Chem. Phys.39, 2808 (1963)

  36. [36]

    Frenkel and B

    D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding molecular simu- lation: From algorithms to applications, Understanding Mol. Simul. 10.1063/1.881812 (1996)

  37. [37]

    S. G. Moore and D. R. Wheeler, Chemical potential per- turbation: A method to predict chemical potentials in pe- riodic molecular simulations, J. Chem. Phys.134, 114514 (2011)

  38. [38]

    Perego, F

    C. Perego, F. Giberti, and M. Parrinello, Chemical po- tential calculations in dense liquids using metadynamics, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top.225, 1621 (2016)

  39. [39]

    Qin and H.-X

    S. Qin and H.-X. Zhou, Fast method for computing chemical potentials and liquid–liquid phase equilibria of macromolecular solutions, J. Phys. Chem. B120, 8164 (2016)

  40. [40]

    Shing and K

    K. Shing and K. Gubbins, The chemical potential in dense fluids and fluid mixtures via computer simulation, Mol. Phys.46, 1109 (1982)

  41. [41]

    G. C. Boulougouris, I. G. Economou, and D. N. Theodorou, On the calculation of the chemical poten- tial using the particle deletion scheme, Mol. Phys.96, 905 (1999)

  42. [42]

    Delgado-Buscalioni, G

    R. Delgado-Buscalioni, G. De Fabritiis, and P. Coveney, Determination of the chemical potential using energy- biased sampling, J. Chem. Phys.123, 054105 (2005)

  43. [43]

    A. V. Neimark and A. Vishnyakov, A simulation method for the calculation of chemical potentials in small, in- homogeneous, and dense systems, J. Chem. Phys.122, 234108 (2005)

  44. [44]

    Qin and H.-X

    S. Qin and H.-X. Zhou, Fft-based method for modeling protein folding and binding under crowding: benchmark- ing on ellipsoidal and all-atom crowders, J. Chem. Theory Comput.9, 4633 (2013)

  45. [45]

    Mon and R

    K. Mon and R. B. Griffiths, Chemical potential by grad- ual insertion of a particle in monte carlo simulation, Phys. Rev. A31, 956 (1985)

  46. [46]

    D. R. Squire and W. G. Hoover, Monte carlo simulation of vacancies in rare-gas crystals, J. Chem. Phys.50, 701 (1969)

  47. [47]

    T. T. Pham and M. R. Shirts, Identifying low vari- ance pathways for free energy calculations of molecular transformations in solution phase, J. Chem. Phys.135, 10.1063/1.3607597 (2011)

  48. [48]

    D. K. Shenfeld, H. Xu, M. P. Eastwood, R. O. Dror, and D. E. Shaw, Minimizing thermodynamic length to select intermediate states for free-energy calculations and replica-exchange simulations, Phys. Rev. E80, 046705 (2009)

  49. [49]

    Decherchi and A

    S. Decherchi and A. Cavalli, Optimal Transport for Free Energy Estimation, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 1618 (2023)

  50. [50]

    H. W. Horn, W. C. Swope, J. W. Pitera, J. D. Madura, T. J. Dick, G. L. Hura, and T. Head-Gordon, Develop- ment of an improved four-site water model for biomolec- ular simulations: TIP4P-Ew, J. Chem. Phys.120, 9665 (2004)

  51. [51]

    I. S. Joung and T. E. Cheatham III, Determination of Alkali and Halide Monovalent Ion Parameters for Use in Explicitly Solvated Biomolecular Simulations, J. Phys. Chem. B112, 9020 (2008)

  52. [52]

    M. J. Abraham, T. Murtola, R. Schulz, S. P´ all, J. C. Smith, B. Hess, and E. Lindahl, GROMACS: High per- formance molecular simulations through multi-level par- allelism from laptops to supercomputers, SoftwareX1-2, 19 (2015)

  53. [53]

    R. W. Hockney, The potential calculation and some ap- plications, Methods Comput. Phys.20, 135 (1970)

  54. [54]

    Nos´ e, A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble, Mol

    S. Nos´ e, A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble, Mol. Phys.52, 255 (1984)

  55. [55]

    W. G. Hoover, Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase- 11 space distributions, Phys. Rev. A31, 1695 (1985)

  56. [56]

    Parrinello and A

    M. Parrinello and A. Rahman, Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method, J. Appl. Phys.52, 7182 (1981)

  57. [57]

    Bernetti and G

    M. Bernetti and G. Bussi, Pressure control using stochas- tic cell rescaling, J. Chem. Phys.153, 114107 (2020)

  58. [58]

    Essmann, L

    U. Essmann, L. Perera, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, and L. G. Pedersen, A smooth particle mesh Ewald method, J. Chem. Phys.103, 8577 (1995)

  59. [59]

    Hess, P-lincs: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation, J

    B. Hess, P-lincs: A parallel linear constraint solver for molecular simulation, J. Chem. Theory Comput.4, 116 (2007)

  60. [60]

    Luzar and D

    A. Luzar and D. Chandler, Hydrogen-bond kinetics in liquid water, Nature379, 55 (1996)

  61. [61]

    van der Spoel, P

    D. van der Spoel, P. J. van Maaren, P. Larsson, and N. Tˆ ımneanu, Thermodynamics of hydrogen bonding in hydrophilic and hydrophobic media, J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 4393 (2006)

  62. [62]

    T. C. Beutler, A. E. Mark, R. C. van Schaik, P. R. Ger- ber, and W. F. van Gunsteren, Avoiding singularities and numerical instabilities in free energy calculations based on molecular simulations, Chem. Phys. Lett.222, 529 (1994)

  63. [63]

    H. Han, D. Li, L. Guo, Y. Yao, H. Yang, and D. Zeng, Isopiestic measurements of water activity for the NaCl– KCl–MgCl2–H2O systems at 323.15 K, J. Chem. Eng. Data60, 1139 (2015)

  64. [64]

    Chipot, Frontiers in free-energy calculations of biolog- ical systems, WIREs Comput

    C. Chipot, Frontiers in free-energy calculations of biolog- ical systems, WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci.4, 71 (2014)

  65. [65]

    A. P. Thompson, H. M. Aktulga, R. Berger, D. S. Bolin- tineanu, W. M. Brown, P. S. Crozier, P. J. In’t Veld, A. Kohlmeyer, S. G. Moore, T. D. Nguyen,et al., LAMMPS– a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales, Comput. Phys. Commun.271, 108171 (2022)

  66. [66]

    D. A. Case, D. S. Cerutti, V. W. D. Cruzeiro, T. A. Dar- den, R. E. Duke, M. Ghazimirsaeed, G. M. Giambasu, T. J. Giese, A. W. Gotz, J. A. Harris,et al., Recent devel- opments in AMBER biomolecular simulations, J. Chem. Inf. Model.65, 7835 (2025)

  67. [67]

    W. R. Scott, P. H. H¨ unenberger, I. G. Tironi, A. E. Mark, S. R. Billeter, J. Fennen, A. E. Torda, T. Hu- ber, P. Kr¨ uger, and W. F. Van Gunsteren, The GRO- MOS biomolecular simulation program package, J. Phys. Chem. A103, 3596 (1999)

  68. [68]

    A. A. Lashkov, I. V. Tolmachev, P. A. Eistrikh-Heller, and S. V. Rubinsky, PyFepRestr: Plugin to PyMOL Molecular Graphics System for Calculating the Free En- ergy of Ligand–Receptor Binding, Crystallogr. Rep.66, 861 (2021)

  69. [69]

    J. H. Moore, C. Margreitter, J. P. Janet, O. Engkvist, B. L. de Groot, and V. Gapsys, Automated relative bind- ing free energy calculations from SMILES to ∆∆G, Com- mun. Chem.6, 1 (2023)

  70. [70]

    M. T. Robo, R. L. Hayes, X. Ding, B. Pulawski, and J. Z. Vilseck, Fast free energy estimates fromλ-dynamics with bias-updated Gibbs sampling, Nat. Commun.14, 1 (2023)

  71. [71]

    S. W. Rick, Increasing the Efficiency of Free Energy Calculations Using Parallel Tempering and Histogram Reweighting, J. Chem. Theory Comput.2, 939 (2006)

  72. [72]

    Novack, S

    D. Novack, S. Zhang, and V. A. Voelz, Massively Paral- lel Free Energy Calculations for In Silico Affinity Matura- tion of Designed Miniproteins, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 8034 (2025)

  73. [73]

    B. A. Shoemaker, T. S. Domingues, and A. Haji-Akbari, Ideal Conductor Model: An Analytical Finite-Size Cor- rection for Nonequilibrium Molecular Dynamics Simula- tions of Ion Transport through Nanoporous Membranes, J. Chem. Theory Comput.18, 7142 (2022)

  74. [74]

    B. A. Shoemaker and A. Haji-Akbari, Ideal conduc- tor/dielectric model (ICDM): A generalized technique to correct for finite-size effects in molecular simulations of hindered ion transport, J. Chem. Phys.160, 24116 (2024)

  75. [75]

    Khalifa, B

    O. Khalifa, B. A. Shoemaker, and A. Haji-Akbari, Sec- ondary finite-size effects and multibarrier free energy landscapes in molecular simulations of hindered ion transport, J. Phys. Chem. B129, 11969 (2025)

  76. [76]

    Ghasemi and R

    M. Ghasemi and R. G. Larson, Future directions in phys- iochemical modeling of the thermodynamics of polyelec- trolyte coacervates, AIChE J.68, e17646 (2022)

  77. [77]

    Y. Luo, E. Harder, R. S. Faibish, and B. Roux, Computer simulations of water flux and salt permeability of the reverse osmosis ft-30 aromatic polyamide membrane, J. Membr. Sci.384, 1 (2011)

  78. [78]

    Kolev and V

    V. Kolev and V. Freger, Molecular dynamics investiga- tion of ion sorption and permeation in desalination mem- branes, J. Phys. Chem. B119, 14168 (2015)

  79. [79]

    Malmir, R

    H. Malmir, R. Epsztein, M. Elimelech, and A. Haji- Akbari, Induced charge anisotropy: A hidden variable affecting ion transport through membranes, Matter2, 735 (2020)

  80. [80]

    B. A. Shoemaker, O. Khalifa, and A. Haji-Akbari, Corre- lations in Charged Multipore Systems: Implications for Enhancing Selectivity and Permeability in Nanoporous Membranes, ACS Nano18, 1420 (2024)

Showing first 80 references.