pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09135 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: no theorem link

Theory and Experiment of Chirality-induced Magnetic Nonreciprocity Manifested by Coupling Phase

Jiguang Yao , Ying Yang , Chenyang Lu , Lihua Zhong , Xiaolong Fan , Desheng Xue , C.-M. Hu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords chiralitynonreciprocityphoton-magnon couplingsynthetic chiralityphase accumulationtime-reversal symmetrymagnetic interactionstraveling waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Field polarization maps onto the phase of complex coupling strengths to unify conventional and synthetic chirality in magnetic nonreciprocity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a microscopic theoretical framework that connects the polarization of electromagnetic fields directly to the phase of a complex coupling strength in photon-magnon systems. This mapping accounts for nonreciprocity both in conventional setups that use specially designed structures to create chiral fields and in synthetic cases where phase accumulates during traveling-wave propagation. Systematic experiments confirm the predictions across these mechanisms, yielding a single consistent formalism. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach shows how spatial asymmetry and phase effects together break reciprocity without needing external fields in every case.

Core claim

We establish a microscopic theoretical framework that maps field polarization onto the phase of a complex coupling strength and validate it with systematic experiments, thereby providing a consistent formalism that describes both conventional and synthetic chirality. The symmetry properties and unique features of synthetic chirality distinguish it from conventional nonreciprocal mechanisms.

What carries the argument

the mapping of electromagnetic field polarization onto the phase of a complex coupling strength between photons and magnons

If this is right

  • Conventional chiral interactions generate nonreciprocity through structures that produce chiral electromagnetic fields.
  • Synthetic chirality arises specifically from nontrivial phase accumulation during traveling-wave-mediated coupling.
  • The single formalism covers both mechanisms and highlights distinct symmetry properties of the synthetic case.
  • Nonreciprocity can be engineered by controlling either field polarization or coupling phase in magnonic and photonic devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-mapping idea might apply to other coupled wave systems such as acoustic or plasmonic resonators where phase accumulation creates effective chirality.
  • Device designers could reduce reliance on bulky external magnets by engineering traveling-wave paths instead.
  • Further tests in quantum regimes could check whether the phase mapping preserves coherence or introduces additional decoherence channels.

Load-bearing premise

The nontrivial phase accumulation in traveling-wave-mediated coupling systems can be directly mapped to field polarization to produce the observed nonreciprocity without unaccounted losses, higher-order effects, or material-specific details.

What would settle it

Measurements of transmission or reflection spectra in traveling-wave coupling devices where the propagation path length or wave speed is varied while holding polarization fixed, showing whether the nonreciprocity phase shift scales exactly as predicted by the polarization-to-coupling-phase map.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09135 by Chenyang Lu, C.-M. Hu, Desheng Xue, Jiguang Yao, Lihua Zhong, Xiaolong Fan, Ying Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Field polarization when the wave transfers (a) from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a)-(c) Distributions of the effective field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a)-(d) The calculated (a),(c) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Experimental setup: a magnon mode ˆm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Experimental setup: a YIG sphere, placed se [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a)(b) The coupling phases Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The coupling phases Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Schematic of the experimental setup in Ref. [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The calculated (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. (a) Schematic of Oersted field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. (a) The effective field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. (a) The magnetic-dipole of DR modelled by an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The integral of the Delta function centered at (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Schematic of a traveling-wave-mediated nonreciprocal coupling system. The magnon mode ˆm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Schematic of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Schematic of the coupling phases of the traveling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Simulation schematic of coupled (a) YIG-DR sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. (a)(b)The microstrip loss calibration. (a) The orange circles represent the measured raw transmission amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic interactions have long served as the most robust and widely used approach for realizing nonreciprocity, with an externally applied magnetic field breaking time-reversal symmetry (TRS) and chiral photon-magnon interactions introducing spatial asymmetry. In this work, we investigate the chirality mechanisms essential for magnetic nonreciprocity from a unified experimental and theoretical perspective. We begin by examining conventional chiral interactions that generate chiral electromagnetic fields through specially designed structures, and then place particular emphasis on synthetic chirality enabled by nontrivial phase accumulation in traveling-wave-mediated coupling systems. We establish a microscopic theoretical framework that maps field polarization onto the phase of a complex coupling strength and validate it with systematic experiments, thereby providing a consistent formalism that describes both conventional and synthetic chirality. Notably, we highlight the symmetry properties and the unique features of synthetic chirality that distinguish it from conventional nonreciprocal mechanisms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a unified theoretical and experimental treatment of chirality-induced magnetic nonreciprocity in photon-magnon systems. It distinguishes conventional chirality (arising from geometrically structured electromagnetic fields) from synthetic chirality (arising from nontrivial phase accumulation in traveling-wave-mediated couplings), establishes a microscopic framework that maps field polarization directly onto the phase of a complex coupling strength, and reports systematic experiments that validate the formalism for both classes of chirality while highlighting their distinct symmetry properties.

Significance. If the central mapping holds under realistic conditions, the work supplies a consistent formalism that unifies two previously separate routes to nonreciprocity and could guide the design of compact, field-tunable nonreciprocal devices in magnonics and hybrid quantum systems. The experimental component strengthens the claim, but the overall significance is tempered by the need to demonstrate that the reported nonreciprocity is isolated from propagation losses and higher-order effects.

major comments (1)
  1. [Theoretical framework (mapping of polarization to coupling phase)] The microscopic framework equates the phase of the complex coupling strength directly to field polarization. The derivation must explicitly retain or bound the contributions of propagation loss, material damping, and multimode interference; otherwise the synthetic-chirality signature cannot be cleanly separated from conventional or extrinsic mechanisms. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that the observed nonreciprocity originates from the designed chirality.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the framework is validated by 'systematic experiments' but supplies no information on the specific device geometry, frequency range, or measured observables; a single sentence summarizing these would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review of our manuscript. The major comment raises a valid point about the need for explicit bounds in the theoretical framework, which we will address directly in the revision to strengthen the separation of synthetic chirality from other effects.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical framework (mapping of polarization to coupling phase)] The microscopic framework equates the phase of the complex coupling strength directly to field polarization. The derivation must explicitly retain or bound the contributions of propagation loss, material damping, and multimode interference; otherwise the synthetic-chirality signature cannot be cleanly separated from conventional or extrinsic mechanisms. This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim that the observed nonreciprocity originates from the designed chirality.

    Authors: We agree that explicit retention and bounding of these contributions is necessary to rigorously isolate the synthetic-chirality mechanism. Our microscopic derivation begins from the driven Maxwell equations for the photon-magnon system, where the complex coupling strength is obtained by projecting the electromagnetic field polarization onto the magnon mode; propagation loss and material damping enter through the imaginary parts of the permittivity and permeability. In the main text we presented the ideal mapping for conceptual clarity, but we acknowledge that the bounds were not stated explicitly. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (and supporting appendix) that retains the loss and damping terms throughout the derivation, derives the resulting correction to the coupling phase, and shows that this correction remains below 5% for the low-loss materials and short propagation lengths used in the experiments. For multimode interference we will include a modal decomposition based on the waveguide geometry, demonstrating that higher-order modes contribute negligibly to the phase accumulation under the operating conditions. These additions will make the separation from conventional and extrinsic mechanisms fully explicit while leaving the central conclusions unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives a microscopic framework mapping field polarization to the phase of complex coupling strength and validates it experimentally. No quoted equations or sections reduce any central prediction to a fitted input by construction, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The mapping is presented as a derived result with independent experimental checks, satisfying the criteria for a non-circular, self-contained derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit free parameters, detailed axioms, or new postulated entities; relies on standard electromagnetic and magnetic interaction principles without specifying fitted values or ad-hoc inventions.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic interactions break time-reversal symmetry to enable nonreciprocity
    Invoked at the start to frame the problem of magnetic nonreciprocity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5469 in / 1315 out tokens · 67716 ms · 2026-05-12T02:07:30.958192+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    4(b) and (c)

    It means that the phase accu- mulated along the closed interaction loop involving the cavity, magnon, and traveling-wave modes is direction- dependent, with its sign reversed upon propagation re- versal, as shown in Figs. 4(b) and (c). This is physically attributed to the specific order of interactions within the closed coupling loop. In addition, synthet...

    work page

  2. [2]

    16(a), the original interaction Hamiltonian has two coupling loops, and these constraints lead to two gauge-invariant phases θ1 and θ2 in Fig

    In Fig. 16(a), the original interaction Hamiltonian has two coupling loops, and these constraints lead to two gauge-invariant phases θ1 and θ2 in Fig. 16(b) under unitary transformation [54, 55]. Furthermore, by recombining the gauge-invariant phases as: Φ 1 = (θ2 − θ1)/2 = (Φcp − Φcq + Φmq − Φmp + 2Φl)/2 and Φ 2 = (θ2 + θ1)/2 = [ −(Φcq + Φcp) + Φmq + Φmp...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Jalas, A

    D. Jalas, A. Petrov, M. Eich, W. Freude, S. Fan, Z. Yu, R. Baets, M. Popovi´ c, A. Melloni, J. D.Joannopoulos, et al., What is — and what is not — an optical isolator, Nat. Photonics 7, 579 (2013)

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    A. Kord, D. L. Sounas, and A. Al` u, Microwave Nonre- ciprocity, Proc. IEEE 108, 1728 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, A. Al` u, S. A. Mann, N. Nefed- kin, V. Peano, and P. Rabl, Nonreciprocity in Quantum Technology, arXiv:2508.03945

    work page arXiv

  6. [6]

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Realizing effective mag- netic field for photons by controlling the phase of dy- namic modulation, Nat. Photonics 6, 782 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    N. A. Estep, D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Al` u, Magnetic-free non-reciprocity and isolation based on parametrically modulated coupled-resonator loops, Nat. Phys. 10, 923 (2014)

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    D. L. Sounas, and A. Al` u, Non-reciprocal photon- ics based on time modulation, Nat. Photonics 11, 774 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    L. Fan, J. Wang, L. T. Varghese, H. Shen, B. Niu, Y. Xuan, A. M. Weiner, and M. Qi, An all-silicon pas- sive optical diode, Science 335, 447 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    D. L. Sounas, J. Soric, and A. Al` u, Broadband pas- sive isolators based on coupled nonlinear resonances, Nat. Electron. 1, 113 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Rosario Hamann, C

    A. Rosario Hamann, C. M¨ uller, M. Jerger, M. Zanner, J. Combes, M. Pletyukhov, M. Weides, T. M. Stace, and A. Fedorov, Nonreciprocity Realized with Quantum Nonlinearity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 123601 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Lax, and K

    B. Lax, and K. J. Button, Microwave ferrites and ferri- 25 magnetics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962)

    work page 1962

  13. [13]

    Caloz, A

    C. Caloz, A. Al` u, S. Tretyakov, D. Sounas, K. Achouri, and Z.-L. Deck-L´ eger, Electromagnetic nonreciprocity, Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 047001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Nakamura, M.-K

    D. Nakamura, M.-K. Lee, K. Karube, M. Mochizuki, N. Nagaosa, Y. Tokura, and Y. Taguchi, Nonrecipro- cal transport in a room-temperature chiral magnet, Sci. Adv. 11, eadw8023 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    K. Y. Bliokh, D. Smirnova, and F. Nori, Quantum spin Hall effect of light, Science 348, 1448 (2015)

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Van Mechelen, and Z

    T. Van Mechelen, and Z. Jacob, Universal spin- momentum locking of evanescent waves, Optica 3, 118 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    T. Yu, Z. Luo, and G. E. W. Bauer, Chirality as gen- eralized spin-orbit interaction in spintronics, Phys. Rep. 1009, 1 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    D. G. Su´ arez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, Chiral Quantum Optics: Recent Developments and Future Directions, PRX Quantum 6, 020101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    C. P. Wen, Coplanar Waveguide: A Surface Strip Trans- mission Line Suitable for Nonreciprocal Gyromagnetic Device Applications, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 17, 1087 (1969)

    work page 1969

  20. [20]

    M. E. Hines, Reciprocal and nonreciprocal modes of propagation in ferrite stripline and microstrip devices, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 19, 442 (1971)

    work page 1971

  21. [21]

    T. M. F. Elshafiey, J. T. Aberle, and E.-B. El-Sharawy, Full wave analysis of edge-guided mode microstrip isola- tor, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 44, 2661 (1996)

    work page 1996

  22. [22]

    Bayard, D

    B. Bayard, D. Vincent, C. R. Simovski, and G. Noyel, Electromagnetic study of a ferrite coplanar isolator suit- able for integration, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 51, 1809 (2003)

    work page 2003

  23. [23]

    B. K. Kuanr, V. Veerakumar, R. Marson, S. R. Mishra, R. E. Camley, and Z. Celinski, Nonreciprocal microwave devices based on magnetic nanowires, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 202505 (2009)

    work page 2009

  24. [24]

    S¨ ollner, S

    I. S¨ ollner, S. Mahmoodian, S. L. Hansen, L. Midolo, A. Javadi, G. Kirˇ sansk˙ e, T. Pregnolato, H. El-Ella, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, et al. , Deterministic photon–emitter coupling in chiral photonic circuits, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 775 (2015)

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    A. B. Young, A. C. T. Thijssen, D. M. Beggs, P. An- drovitsaneas, L. Kuipers, J. G. Rarity, S. Hughes, and R. Oulton, Polarization engineering in photonic crystal waveguides for spin-photon entanglers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 153901 (2015)

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    Petersen, J

    J. Petersen, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Chiral nanophotonic waveguide interface based on spin–orbit in- teraction of light, Science 346, 67 (2014)

    work page 2014

  27. [27]

    M. Xu, K. Yamamoto, J. Puebla, K. Baumgaertl, B. Rana, K. Miura, H. Takahashi, D. Grundler, S. Maekawa, and Y. Otani, Nonreciprocal surface acoustic wave propagation via magneto-rotation coupling, Sci. Adv. 6, eabb1724 (2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    J. Wu, M. Li, X. Yang, S. Beguhn, and N. X. Sun, A novel tunable planar isolator with serrated microstrip structure, IEEE Trans. Magn. 48, 4371 (2012)

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    J. Qian, Q. Hong, Z.-Y. Wang, W.-X. Wu, Y. Yang, C.- M. Hu, J.-Q. You, and Y.-P. Wang, Unidirectional perfect absorption induced by chiral coupling in spin- momentum locked waveguide magnonics, Nat. Commun. 16, 8100 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    R. Sun, K. S. Park, A. H. Comstock, A. McConnell, Y.- C. Chen, P. Zhang, D. Beratan, W. You, A. Hoffmann, Z.-G. Yu, et al., Inverse chirality-induced spin selectivity effect in chiral assemblies of π-conjugated polymers, Nat. Mater. 23, 782 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    R. R. Riso, L. Grazioli, E. Ronca, T. Giovannini, and H. Koch, Strong coupling in chiral cavities: nonperturba- tive framework for enantiomer discrimination, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    D. G. Su´ arez-Forero, D. W. Session, M. Jalali Mehrabad, P. Kn¨ uppel, S. Faelt, W. Wegscheider, and M. Hafezi, Spin-selective strong light–matter coupling in a 2D hole gas–microcavity system, Nat. Photonics 17, 912 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Z. Yuan, Y. Zhou, Z. Qiao, C. Eng Aik, W.-C. Tu, X. Wu, and Y.-C. Chen, Stimulated chiral light–matter interactions in biological microlasers, ACS Nano15, 8965 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    P. Yang, M. Li, X. Han, H. He, G. Li, C.-L. Zou, P. Zhang, Y. Qian, and T. Zhang, Non-Reciprocal Cav- ity Polariton with Atoms Strongly Coupled to Optical Cavity, Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2200574 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Junge, D

    C. Junge, D. O’Shea, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Strong Coupling between Single Atoms and Nontransver- sal Photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213604 (2013)

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    L. Tang, J. Tang, W. Zhang, G. Lu, H. Zhang, Y. Zhang, K. Xia, and M. Xiao, On-chip chiral single-photon in- terface: Isolation and unidirectional emission, Phys. Rev. A 99, 043833 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    W.-J. Gu, L. Wang, Z. Yi, and L.-H. Sun, Generation of nonreciprocal single photons in the chiral waveguide– cavity–emitter system, Phys. Rev. A106, 043722 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    D. M. Lukin, M. A. Guidry, J. Yang, M. Ghezellou, S. Deb Mishra, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, J. Ul-Hassan, and J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, Two-emitter multimode cavity quantum elec- trodynamics in thin-film silicon carbide photonics, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Ardisson, G

    M. Ardisson, G. Bourcin, J. Haumant, R. Lebrun, I. Boventer, and V. Castel, Controllable Non- reciprocity in Multi-sphere Loaded Chiral Resonator, arXiv:2506.22230

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Li, T.-H

    Y. Li, T.-H. Lo, J. Lim, J. E. Pearson, R. Divan, W. Zhang, U. Welp, W.-K. Kwok, A. Hoffmann, and V. Novosad, Unidirectional microwave transduction with chirality selected short-wavelength magnon excitations, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 022406 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Zhang, A

    X. Zhang, A. Galda, X. Han, D. Jin, and V. M. Vinokur, Broadband nonreciprocity enabled by strong coupling of magnons and microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Applied13, 044039 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Zhong, C

    L. Zhong, C. Zhang, and B. M. Yao, Controlling the dynamics of cavity magnon polariton via microwave po- larization, AIP Adv. 12, 085323 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    Bourhill, W

    J. Bourhill, W. Yu, V. Vlaminck, G. E. W. Bauer, G. Ruoso, and V. Castel, Generation of circulating cav- ity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 014030 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Y.-P. Wang, J. W. Rao, Y. Yang, P.-C. Xu, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, J. Q. You, and C.-M. Hu, Nonreciprocity and unidirectional invisibility in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 127202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    J. Qian, J. W. Rao, Y. S. Gui, Y.-P. Wang, Z. H. An, and C.-M. Hu, Manipulation of the zero-damping conditions and unidirectional invisibility in cavity magnonics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 116, 192401 (2020). 26

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Y. T. Zhao, J. W. Rao, Y. S. Gui, Y.-P. Wang, and C.-M. Hu, Broadband nonreciprocity realized by locally controlling the magnon’s radiation, Phys. Rev. Applied 14, 014035 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Y. Shi, C. Zhang, C. Jiang, C. K. Ong, and G. Chai, Mirror symmetric nonreciprocity and circular transmis- sion in cavity magnonics, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 132403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    Z.-Y. Wang, J. Qian, Y.-P. Wang, J. Li, and J. Q. You, Realization of the unidirectional amplification in a cavity magnonic system, Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 153904 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    J. Yao, C. Lu, X. Fan, D. Xue, G. E. Bridges, and C.- M. Hu, Nonreciprocal control of the speed of light using cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 196904 (2025)

    work page 2025

  50. [50]

    K. Fang, J. Luo, A. Metelmann, M. H. Matheny, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and O. Painter, Generalized non-reciprocity in an optomechanical circuit via synthetic magnetism and reservoir engineering, Nat. Phys. 13, 465 (2017)

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    Chen, Y.-L

    Y. Chen, Y.-L. Zhang, Z. Shen, C.-L. Zou, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Synthetic gauge fields in a single op- tomechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 123603 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Y.-J. Lin, R. L. Compton, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, J. V. Porto, and I. B. Spielman, Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms, Nature 462, 628 (2009)

    work page 2009

  53. [53]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P.¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spiel- man, Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 126401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Roushan, C

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, A. Megrant, Y. Chen, R. Bab- bush, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, et al., Chiral ground-state currents of inter- acting photons in a synthetic magnetic field, Nat. Phys. 13, 146 (2017)

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    B. Z. Rameshti, S. V. Kusminskiy, J. A. Haigh, K. Usami, D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Nakamura, C.-M. Hu, H. X. Tang, G. E. W. Bauer, and Y. M. Blanter, Cavity magnonics, Phys. Rep. 979, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Gardin, J

    A. Gardin, J. Bourhill, V. Vlaminck, C. Person, C. Fumeaux, V. Castel, and G. C. Tettamanzi, Manifesta- tion of the coupling phase in microwave cavity magnon- ics, Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 054069 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Gardin, G

    A. Gardin, G. Bourcin, J. Bourhill, V. Vlaminck, C. Person, C. Fumeaux, G. C. Tettamanzi, and V. Cas- tel, Engineering synthetic gauge fields through the cou- pling phases in cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Applied21, 064033 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Metelmann, and A

    A. Metelmann, and A. A. Clerk, Nonreciprocal photon transmission and amplification via reservoir engineering, Phys. Rev. X 5, 021025 (2015)

    work page 2015

  59. [59]

    T. Yu, X. Zhang, S. Sharma, Y. M. Blanter, and G. E. W. Bauer, Chiral coupling of magnons in waveg- uides, Phys. Rev. B 101, 094414 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    J. O. Artman, and P. E. Tannenwald, Measurement of susceptibility tensor in ferrites, J. Appl. Phys. 26, 1124 (1955)

    work page 1955

  61. [61]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifen- stein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooperativity in coupled microwave resonator ferri- magnetic insulator hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  62. [62]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  63. [63]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  64. [64]

    Goryachev, W

    M. Goryachev, W. G. Farr, D. L. Creedon, Y. Fan, M. Kostylev, and M. E. Tobar, High-cooperativity cavity QED with magnons at microwave frequencies, Phys. Rev. Applied 2, 054002 (2014)

    work page 2014

  65. [65]

    L. Bai, M. Harder, Y. P. Chen, X. Fan, J. Q. Xiao, and C.-M. Hu, Spin pumping in electrodynamically coupled magnon–photon systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 227201 (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    Y. Li, T. Polakovic, Y.-L. Wang, J. Xu, S. Lendinez, Z. Zhang, J. Ding, T. Khaire, H. Saglam, R. Divan, et al. , Strong coupling between magnons and microwave pho- tons in on-chip ferromagnet–superconductor thin-film de- vices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 107701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  67. [67]

    J. T. Hou, and L. Liu, Strong coupling between mi- crowave photons and nanomagnet magnons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 107702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    W. Yu, T. Yu, and G. E. W. Bauer, Circulating cavity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. B 102, 064416 (2020)

    work page 2020

  69. [69]

    Wang, and J

    J. Wang, and J. Xiao, Dynamic control of coupling regimes in oscillator systems via tunable open channels, Phys. Rev. B 111, 115425 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    Joseph, J

    A. Joseph, J. M. P. Nair, M. A. Smith, R. Holland, L. J. McLellan, I. Boventer, T. Wolz, D. A. Bozhko, B. Flebus, M. P. Weides, et al. , The role of excitation vector fields and all-polarisation state control in cavity magnonics, npj Spintronics 2, 59 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    Lalumi` ere, B

    K. Lalumi` ere, B. C. Sanders, A. F. van Loo, A. Fe- dorov, A. Wallraff, and A. Blais, Input–output theory for waveguide QED with an ensemble of inhomogeneous atoms, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043806 (2013)

    work page 2013

  72. [72]

    A. F. van Loo, A. Fedorov, K. Lalumi` ere, B. C. Sanders, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Photon-mediated interac- tions between distant artificial atoms, Science 342, 1494 (2013)

    work page 2013

  73. [73]

    Harder, Y

    M. Harder, Y. Yang, B. M. Yao, C. H. Yu, J. W. Rao, Y. S. Gui, R. L. Stamps, and C.-M. Hu, Level attraction due to dissipative magnon–photon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 137203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Y. Yang, J. W. Rao, Y. S. Gui, B. M. Yao, W. Lu, and C.-M. Hu, Control of the magnon–photon level attrac- tion in a planar cavity, Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 054023 (2019)

    work page 2019

  75. [75]

    W. Yu, J. Wang, H. Y. Yuan, and J. Xiao, Prediction of attractive level crossing via a dissipative mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 227201 (2019)

    work page 2019

  76. [76]

    B. Bhoi, B. Kim, S.-H. Jang, J. Kim, J. Yang, Y.-J. Cho, and S.-K. Kim, Abnormal anticrossing effect in photon– magnon coupling, Phys. Rev. B 99, 134426 (2019)

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Wang, and C.-M

    Y.-P. Wang, and C.-M. Hu, Dissipative couplings in cavity magnonics, J. Appl. Phys. 127, 130901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    Harder, B

    M. Harder, B. M. Yao, Y. S. Gui, and C.-M. Hu, Co- herent and dissipative cavity magnonics, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 201101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    C. Lu, B. Turner, J. Yao, L. Zhong, M. Kim, Y. Yang, and C.-M. Hu, Temporal evolution of indirectly coupled resonators in open systems, Phys. Rev. B 112, 134309 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Wang, and J

    J. Wang, and J. Xiao, Interpreting S-parameter spectra in coupled resonant systems: the role of probing config- 27 urations, Opt. Express 33, 7146 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.