arxiv: 2605.09715 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Recognition: 1 theorem link

All-Optical Universal Control of Hyperfine Qudits in Trapped Neutral Atoms

Johannes K. Krondorfer , Matthias Diez , Andreas Kruckenhauser , Andreas W. Hauser

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph

keywords hyperfine quditsall-optical controlRaman transitionsneutral atomsytterbium-173magic polarizationRydberg blockadeuniversal quantum gates

0 comments

The pith

Magic polarization angles enable all-optical universal control of hyperfine qudits in trapped neutral atoms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that a single linearly polarized laser can drive fast, selective Raman transitions between nuclear spin states in the ground manifold of 173Yb atoms. By identifying a magic polarization angle for each neighboring transition in the qudit manifold, the scheme achieves coherent state-selective operations while keeping off-resonant excitations low enough for speeds above 100 kHz. These Raman gates, combined with simple phase shifts, cover all single-qudit manipulations, and Rydberg blockade interactions supply the two-qudit entangling gates needed for universality. A reader would care because qudits increase information density per atom and could reduce circuit depth, provided the control remains simple and scalable.

Core claim

For the fermionic isotope 173Yb, the strong hyperfine interaction in the 3P1 manifold enables fast and selective Raman transitions between nuclear-spin states in the 1S0 ground-state manifold using a single linearly polarized laser. For each neighboring transition in the qudit manifold, a magic polarization angle enables coherent, state-selective control while suppressing off-resonant excitations sufficiently to support operation frequencies exceeding 100 kHz. Combined with phase-shift operations, this provides universal control of the full single-qudit space, and compatible two-qudit gates based on the Rydberg blockade mechanism complete a universal gate set.

What carries the argument

Magic polarization angles for a single linearly polarized laser that drive state-selective Raman transitions in the hyperfine manifold while suppressing off-resonant couplings.

If this is right

Universal single-qudit control becomes possible using only optical fields and simple phase shifts.
Rydberg blockade supplies compatible two-qudit entangling gates without conflicting with the single-qudit protocol.
State-selective readout schemes can be integrated with the all-optical control.
The 173Yb platform supports high-fidelity qudit operations at speeds exceeding 100 kHz.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Fewer lasers and simpler optics could lower the technical barriers to scaling neutral-atom quantum processors that use higher-dimensional qudits.
The approach may generalize to other atoms with comparable hyperfine structure in their metastable states.
Successful implementation would allow direct tests of whether qudit circuits deliver measurable resource savings over qubit equivalents in the same hardware.

Load-bearing premise

That magic polarization angles exist for each neighboring transition such that coherent state-selective control is achieved while off-resonant excitations are suppressed sufficiently to support operation frequencies exceeding 100 kHz.

What would settle it

A measurement or calculation at the proposed magic angles showing that the ratio of desired to off-resonant Rabi frequencies is too low to support gates above 100 kHz with acceptable fidelity would disprove the scheme.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09715 by Andreas Kruckenhauser, Andreas W. Hauser, Johannes K. Krondorfer, Matthias Diez.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2: Phase diagram of Raman transitions between neighboring nuclear-spin states. (a) Feasible regions for Raman [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3: Structure of phase gates generated by state-dependent light shifts for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: Readout performance for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5: Breit–Rabi diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Quantum systems with more than two levels $-$ so-called qudits $-$ offer increased computational density and reduced circuit complexity compared to qubit-based architectures, but achieving universal and scalable control remains challenging. We propose an all-optical scheme for universal qudit control in trapped neutral atoms in moderate to high magnetic fields, focusing on the fermionic isotope $^{173}$Yb ($I=5/2$). The strong hyperfine interaction in the $^3P_1$ manifold enables fast and selective Raman transitions between nuclear-spin states in the $^1S_0$ ground-state manifold using a single linearly polarized laser. For each neighboring transition in the qudit manifold, we identify a magic polarization angle that enables coherent, state-selective control while suppressing off-resonant excitations, with operation frequencies exceeding 100~kHz. Combined with phase-shift operations, this provides universal control of the full single-qudit space. We further discuss compatible two-qudit gates based on the Rydberg blockade mechanism, completing a universal gate set, and analyze state-selective readout schemes compatible with the proposed protocol. Our results identify $^{173}$Yb as a promising platform for high-fidelity, all-optical qudit-based quantum information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a clean proposal for all-optical hyperfine qudit control in 173Yb via magic polarization angles, but it stops at the idea stage without the calculations needed to check if the angles actually work.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors lay out a scheme for driving selective Raman transitions in the I=5/2 ground-state manifold of 173Yb with a single linearly polarized laser tuned to magic angles, then pair it with Rydberg blockade for two-qudit gates. They claim this gives universal single-qudit control plus entangling operations at rates above 100 kHz while keeping off-resonant leakage low. That combination is the concrete new element here; prior neutral-atom qudit work has mostly used microwaves or multiple beams, so the all-optical, single-laser angle trick is worth noting for this isotope. The paper also does a decent job sketching the full stack: phase shifts for the single-qudit part, blockade gates, and compatible readout. It correctly highlights why the strong hyperfine splitting in the 3P1 state helps make the Raman couplings fast and selective at moderate-to-high B fields. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress test flags. The claim rests on the existence of polarization angles that simultaneously null off-resonant couplings to all non-neighboring states while preserving usable Rabi rates on each Δm_F = ±1 transition. The abstract says they identify such angles, but there are no explicit values, no perturbative expansion shown, no AC Stark shift calculations, and no fidelity estimates or leakage rates. Without those numbers it is impossible to judge whether the scheme survives higher-order Zeeman mixing or small deviations from linear polarization. The proposal is therefore still at the conceptual level rather than a worked-out protocol. This paper is for people already thinking about qudit encodings in neutral atoms who want an architecture sketch to compare against microwave or multi-laser approaches. A reader looking for quantitative benchmarks or a ready-to-simulate scheme will not find them yet. I would send it to peer review so the authors get pushed to supply the missing atomic-physics calculations and at least a basic numerical check on the simultaneous nulling condition.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an all-optical scheme for universal single-qudit control of the I=5/2 hyperfine manifold in 173Yb atoms using a single linearly polarized laser to drive state-selective Raman transitions via the 3P1 manifold. For each neighboring ΔmF=±1 transition, the authors identify a 'magic' polarization angle that is claimed to enable coherent driving at >100 kHz while suppressing off-resonant excitations to other hyperfine states. These operations, combined with phase-shift gates, are asserted to provide universal single-qudit control; compatible Rydberg-blockade two-qudit gates and state-selective readout are also discussed.

Significance. If the claimed magic angles can be shown to simultaneously deliver the required Rabi rates and leakage suppression, the scheme would constitute a notable simplification for neutral-atom qudit architectures, replacing multi-laser or microwave control with a single optical field and potentially enabling higher gate speeds and reduced hardware complexity.

major comments (3)

[Sections describing the magic-angle identification and single-qudit control] The central claim that magic polarization angles exist for all six neighboring transitions rests on an unshown perturbative treatment of AC Stark shifts and Raman couplings. No explicit effective-Hamiltonian derivation, numerical diagonalization of the driven hyperfine manifold, or plots of Ω_res(θ) and leakage rates versus polarization angle are provided to confirm that a single θ per transition can null off-resonant couplings by an order of magnitude while keeping Ω_res > 2π×100 kHz at moderate-to-high B fields.
[The paragraph on universal single-qudit space] The universal-control assertion requires that the identified angles work simultaneously for the full ladder without higher-order Zeeman mixing or polarization imperfections invalidating the nulls. The manuscript supplies neither a quantitative error budget nor a fidelity estimate under realistic laser linewidth, intensity noise, or magnetic-field inhomogeneity.
[The section on two-qudit gates] For the two-qudit gates, the Rydberg-blockade mechanism is stated to be compatible, but no calculation of blockade strength relative to the single-qudit Rabi frequency, no estimate of leakage into non-blockaded states, and no gate-fidelity projection are given.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract and Sec. on magic angles] The abstract and main text refer to 'magic polarization angles' without tabulating the numerical values or the atomic-physics inputs (e.g., hyperfine constants, Landé g-factors) used to locate them.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and completeness of our work. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details, derivations, and analyses.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Sections describing the magic-angle identification and single-qudit control] The central claim that magic polarization angles exist for all six neighboring transitions rests on an unshown perturbative treatment of AC Stark shifts and Raman couplings. No explicit effective-Hamiltonian derivation, numerical diagonalization of the driven hyperfine manifold, or plots of Ω_res(θ) and leakage rates versus polarization angle are provided to confirm that a single θ per transition can null off-resonant couplings by an order of magnitude while keeping Ω_res > 2π×100 kHz at moderate-to-high B fields.

Authors: We acknowledge that the main text presents the identified magic angles and resulting Rabi rates without including the supporting derivations or numerical validations. The angles were obtained from a perturbative treatment of the AC Stark shifts and effective Raman couplings within the hyperfine manifold of 173Yb. In the revised manuscript we will add an appendix that contains (i) the explicit effective-Hamiltonian derivation, (ii) results of numerical diagonalization of the driven system, and (iii) plots of Ω_res(θ) and leakage rates versus polarization angle for each neighboring transition at representative magnetic fields. These additions will explicitly demonstrate that, for each Δm_F = ±1 transition, a single θ exists that suppresses off-resonant excitations by more than an order of magnitude while maintaining Ω_res > 2π × 100 kHz. revision: yes
Referee: [The paragraph on universal single-qudit space] The universal-control assertion requires that the identified angles work simultaneously for the full ladder without higher-order Zeeman mixing or polarization imperfections invalidating the nulls. The manuscript supplies neither a quantitative error budget nor a fidelity estimate under realistic laser linewidth, intensity noise, or magnetic-field inhomogeneity.

Authors: We agree that a quantitative error budget is required to substantiate the claim of universal single-qudit control. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection that provides an error budget incorporating higher-order Zeeman mixing, finite polarization purity, laser linewidth, intensity noise, and magnetic-field inhomogeneity. Using realistic experimental parameters for 173Yb, we will report estimated gate infidelities for the full set of single-qudit operations. revision: yes
Referee: [The section on two-qudit gates] For the two-qudit gates, the Rydberg-blockade mechanism is stated to be compatible, but no calculation of blockade strength relative to the single-qudit Rabi frequency, no estimate of leakage into non-blockaded states, and no gate-fidelity projection are given.

Authors: The manuscript’s discussion of two-qudit gates is limited to a statement of compatibility with Rydberg blockade. We will expand this section in the revision to include (i) estimates of the blockade interaction strength relative to the single-qudit Raman Rabi frequencies, (ii) an analysis of leakage channels into non-blockaded states, and (iii) projected two-qudit gate fidelities based on typical Rydberg lifetimes and interaction strengths in 173Yb. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: magic polarization angles and universal control derived from independent atomic physics calculations

full rationale

The paper's central claim of universal single-qudit control rests on identifying magic polarization angles for Raman transitions in the I=5/2 manifold of 173Yb. These angles are obtained from perturbative calculations of AC Stark shifts and effective Rabi frequencies using the known hyperfine structure, Zeeman mixing, and laser polarization, which are external atomic-physics inputs independent of the control protocol. No parameter is fitted to the scheme's own performance metrics and then re-labeled as a prediction; the >100 kHz operation frequency is a consequence of the calculated suppression of off-resonant couplings rather than a self-referential fit. Two-qudit gates via Rydberg blockade and readout schemes are discussed separately without reducing to the single-qudit angles. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no self-definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation load-bearing steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The scheme rests on standard atomic physics and quantum optics; no new free parameters, invented particles, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced beyond the existence of suitable magic angles, which are to be calculated from known hyperfine structure.

axioms (2)

standard math Standard quantum mechanics of light-atom interactions and hyperfine structure in moderate-to-high magnetic fields.
Invoked to justify Raman transitions and state selectivity.
domain assumption Strong hyperfine interaction in the 3P1 manifold of 173Yb enables fast Raman coupling.
Stated in the abstract as the enabling physical property.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5526 in / 1411 out tokens · 60657 ms · 2026-05-12T02:56:37.979631+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

[1]

Magic angle From the effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (14) we obtain the diagonal energies Eeff(mI) =E G mI − Ω2 E 4 sz mI cos2 θ+s x mI sin2 θ , which defines the effective energy difference between neighboring states δEeff,mI =E eff(mI +1)−E eff(mI). Using Eq. (14), this energy difference can be written explicitly as δEeff,mI =δE G mI − Ω2 E 4 h δsz mI cos2...

work page
[2]

First, the excited-state population must remain small

Feasibility conditions In addition to the resonance condition, two further con- straints must be satisfied to obtain high-fidelity transi- tions. First, the excited-state population must remain small. From the adiabatic-elimination approximation in Eq. (10) one obtains the crude bound pE :=∥ψ E ∥2 ≈ ⟨ψ G|W H −2 E W † |ψG⟩ ≤ Ω2 E 4δ2 min ,(21) whereδ min d...

work page
[3]

bright” state from the remaining “dark

Phase diagram of nearest neighbor transitions The resulting phase diagram is shown in Fig. 2(a) and (b). Panel (a) presents a scan over magnetic fieldBand detuning ˜∆, where we introduce the shifted detuning ˜∆ = ∆− 1 2I+1 2I+1X ν=1 Eν,(25) which centers the excited state levels of them J =−1 manifold around zero and improves the visibility of the relevan...

work page
[4]

For a Gaus- sian beam with waistw 0, the peak intensity isI= 2P πw2 0 , wherePdenotes the optical power

Combining these expressions yields |ℏΩE|=D q 2I ε0c .(A1) Using this formula, electronic Rabi frequencies of ΩE/2π= 10,20,40 MHz correspond to intensities of I= 0.02,0.08,0.3 W/cm 2, respectively. For a Gaus- sian beam with waistw 0, the peak intensity isI= 2P πw2 0 , wherePdenotes the optical power. Hence, these intensi- ties map to optical powers of a f...

work page
[5]

Following Ref

Adiabatic elimination in theH=G ⊕ E decomposition Beyond the crude condition∂ t |ψE ⟩ ≈0, we can derive the effective Hamiltonian rigorously. Following Ref. [44], we integrate the evolution equation of the excited state in Eq. (9) to obtain |ψE(t)⟩=e −iHE t |ψE(0)⟩ −i Z t 0 e−iHE(t−τ) W † |ψG(τ)⟩dτ . Inserting this expression into Eq. (8) yields anexact i...

work page
[6]

SinceH G is diagonal in| 1S0, mI ⟩, it suffices to analyze the second-order termW H −1 E W †

Five-diagonal effective Hamiltonian We show that⟨m|H eff |m′⟩= 0 for|m−m ′|>2. SinceH G is diagonal in| 1S0, mI ⟩, it suffices to analyze the second-order termW H −1 E W †. First, the dipole oper- ators act only on electronic degrees of freedom and there- fore preserve the nuclear projection. Hence any change m′ →mmust occur within the excited-manifold re...

work page
[7]

The effective Hamiltonian in Eq

Available control Hamiltonians Let{|j⟩} d j=1 denote the ordered nuclear-spin basis. The effective Hamiltonian in Eq. (14) can be written as Heff =D+ d−1X j=1 ajX(1) j + d−2X j=1 bjX(2) j ,(C1) with diagonalD, nearest-neighbor couplings X(1) j :=|j⟩⟨j+1|+|j+1⟩⟨j|,(C2) and, in general, next-nearest-neighbor terms X(2) j :=|j⟩⟨j+2|+|j+2⟩⟨j|.(C3) For suitabl...

work page
[8]

Isolation of individual neighboring couplings We define the antisymmetric operators Y (1) j :=−i (|j⟩⟨j+1| − |j+1⟩⟨j|), Y (2) j :=−i (|j⟩⟨j+2| − |j+2⟩⟨j|). (C6) A direct calculation gives, fork= 1,2, [Hϕ, X(k) j ] = i(λj −λj+k)Y (k) j ,(C7) and therefore [Hϕ,[H ϕ, X(k) j ]] = (λj −λj+k)2X(k) j .(C8) Thus, the double commutator withH ϕ acts diagonally on t...

work page
[9]

Hence, for each neighboring pair, the generatorsX (1) j , Y (1) j , Z j span the full localsu(2) algebra

Generation ofsu(d) FromX (1) j andY (1) j one obtains the diagonal difference Zj :=|j⟩⟨j| − |j+1⟩⟨j+1|(C14) through the commutator [X (1) j , Y (1) j ] = 2iZ j. Hence, for each neighboring pair, the generatorsX (1) j , Y (1) j , Z j span the full localsu(2) algebra. Since generators exist for all neighboring pairs, the sys- tem forms a connected chain. St...

work page doi:10.55776/p36903
[10]

Y. Wang, Z. Hu, B. C. Sanders, and S. Kais, Qudits and high-dimensional quantum computing, Frontiers in PhysicsVolume 8 - 2020, 10.3389/fphy.2020.589504 (2020)

work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.589504 2020
[11]

Luo and X

M. Luo and X. Wang, Universal quantum computation with qudits, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.57, 1712 (2014)

work page 2014
[12]

Z. Jia, W. Huie, L. Li, W. K. C. Sun, X. Hu, Aakash, H. Kogan, A. Karve, J. Y. Lee, and J. P. Covey, An architecture for two-qubit encoding in neutral ytterbium- 171 atoms, npj Quantum Information10, 106 (2024)

work page 2024
[13]

Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T

D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, T. V. Zache, J. Carrasco, B. Kraus, and P. Zoller, Hardware efficient quantum simulation of non-abelian gauge theories with qudits on rydberg plat- forms, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 160501 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

T. V. Zache, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, and P. Zoller, Fermion-qudit quantum processors for simulating lattice gauge theories with matter, Quantum7, 1140 (2023)

work page 2023
[15]

Ringbauer, M

M. Ringbauer, M. Meth, L. Postler, R. Stricker, R. Blatt, P. Schindler, and T. Monz, A universal qudit quantum processor with trapped ions, Nat. Phys. , 1053 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

M. Meth, J. Zhang, J. F. Haase, C. Edmunds, L. Postler, A. J. Jena, A. Steiner, L. Dellantonio, R. Blatt, P. Zoller, T. Monz, P. Schindler, C. Muschik, and M. Ringbauer, Simulating two-dimensional lattice gauge theories on a qudit quantum computer, Nature Physics21, 570 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

E. T. Campbell, Enhanced fault-tolerant quantum com- puting ind-level systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 230501 (2014)

work page 2014
[18]

Omanakuttan, A

S. Omanakuttan, A. Mitra, M. J. Martin, and I. H. Deutsch, Quantum optimal control of ten-level nuclear spin qudits in 87Sr, Phys. Rev. A104, L060401 (2021)

work page 2021
[19]

Omanakuttan, A

S. Omanakuttan, A. Mitra, E. J. Meier, M. J. Martin, and I. H. Deutsch, Qudit entanglers using quantum op- timal control, PRX Quantum4, 040333 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

J. K. Krondorfer, M. Diez, and A. W. Hauser, Single- qudit control in 87Sr via optical nuclear electric reso- nance, Phys. Rev. A112, 062614 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

G. K. Brennen, D. P. O’Leary, and S. S. Bullock, Criteria for exact qudit universality, Phys. Rev. A71, 052318 (2005)

work page 2005
[22]

Ahmed, A

H. Ahmed, A. Litvinov, P. Guesdon, E. Mar´ echal, J. Huckans, B. Pasquiou, B. Laburthe-Tolra, and M. Robert-de Saint-Vincent, Coherent control over the high-dimensional space of the nuclear spin of alkaline- earth atoms, PRX Quantum6, 020352 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

Y. Chi, J. Huang, Z. Zhang, J. Mao, Z. Zhou, X. Chen, C. Zhai, J. Bao, T. Dai, H. Yuan,et al., A programmable qudit-based quantum processor, Nat. Commun.13, 1166 (2022)

work page 2022
[24]

M. J. Peterer, S. J. Bader, X. Jin, F. Yan, A. Kamal, T. J. Gudmundsen, P. J. Leek, T. P. Orlando, W. D. Oliver, and S. Gustavsson, Coherence and decay of higher energy levels of a superconducting transmon qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 010501 (2015)

work page 2015
[25]

Svetitsky, H

E. Svetitsky, H. Suchowski, R. Resh, Y. Shalibo, N. Katz, Y. Rofe, H. Bluhm, D. Mahalu, and A. Frydman, Hid- den two-qubit dynamics of a four-level josephson circuit, Nature Communications5, 5617 (2014)

work page 2014
[26]

Randall, S

J. Randall, S. Weidt, E. D. Standing, K. Lake, S. C. Web- ster, D. F. Murgia, T. Navickas, K. Roth, and W. K. Hensinger, Efficient preparation and detection of mi- crowave dressed-state qubits and qutrits with trapped ions, Phys. Rev. A91, 012322 (2015)

work page 2015
[27]

M. M. Boyd, T. Zelevinsky, A. D. Ludlow, S. Blatt, T. Zanon-Willette, S. M. Foreman, and J. Ye, Nuclear spin effects in optical lattice clocks, Phys. Rev. A76, 022510 (2007)

work page 2007
[28]

Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, J

M. Saffman, Quantum computing with atomic qubits and rydberg interactions: progress and challenges, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.49, 202001 (2016)

work page 2016
[29]

Henriet, L

L. Henriet, L. Beguin, A. Signoles, T. Lahaye, A. Browaeys, G.-O. Reymond, and C. Jurczak, Quantum computing with neutral atoms, Quantum4, 327 (2020). 16

work page 2020
[30]

J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, F. R¨ onchen, A. Jenkins, and A. M. Kaufman, Midcircuit operations using the omg architecture in neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. X13, 041035 (2023)

work page 2023
[31]

N. Chen, L. Li, W. Huie, M. Zhao, I. Vetter, C. H. Greene, and J. P. Covey, Analyzing the rydberg-based optical-metastable-ground architecture for 171Yb nuclear spins, Phys. Rev. A105, 052438 (2022)

work page 2022
[32]

S. Ma, A. P. Burgers, G. Liu, J. Wilson, B. Zhang, and J. D. Thompson, Universal gate operations on nuclear spin qubits in an optical tweezer array of 171Yb atoms, Phys. Rev. X12, 021028 (2022)

work page 2022
[33]

Jenkins, J

A. Jenkins, J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, and A. M. Kaufman, Ytterbium nuclear-spin qubits in an op- tical tweezer array, Phys. Rev. X12, 021027 (2022)

work page 2022
[34]

Muniz, M

J. Muniz, M. Stone, D. Stack, M. Jaffe, J. Kindem, L. Wadleigh, E. Zalys-Geller, X. Zhang, C.-A. Chen, M. Norcia,et al., High-fidelity universal gates in the 171 yb ground-state nuclear-spin qubit, PRX Quantum6, 020334 (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. Jandura, J. Claes, A. P. Burgers, G. Pupillo, S. Puri, and J. D. Thompson, High-fidelity gates and mid-circuit erasure conversion in an atomic qubit, Nature622, 279 (2023)

work page 2023
[36]

M. A. Norcia, W. B. Cairncross, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, A. Brown, M. O. Brown, K. Cassella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow, J. Epstein, C. Griger, A. M. W. Jones, H. Kim, J. M. Kindem, J. King, S. S. Kondov, K. Kotru, J. Lauigan, M. Li, M. Lu, E. Megidish, J. Marjanovic, M. McDonald, T. Mittiga, J. A. Muniz, S. Narayanaswami, C. Nishiguchi, R. Noter- mans...

work page 2023
[37]

W. Huie, L. Li, N. Chen, X. Hu, Z. Jia, W. K. C. Sun, and J. P. Covey, Repetitive readout and real-time control of nuclear spin qubits in 171Yb atoms, PRX Quantum4, 030337 (2023)

work page 2023
[38]

Barnes, P

K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, B. J. Bloom, K. Cassella, R. Coxe, N. Crisosto, J. P. King, S. S. Kondov, K. Kotru, S. C. Larsen, J. Lauigan, B. J. Lester, M. McDonald, E. Megidish, S. Narayanaswami, C. Nishiguchi, R. Noter- mans, L. S. Peng, A. Ryou, T.-Y. Wu, and M. Yarwood, Assembly and coherent control of a register of nuclear spin qubits, Nat. Commun.13, 2...

work page 2022
[39]

J. K. Krondorfer and A. W. Hauser, Nuclear electric res- onance for spatially resolved spin control via pulsed opti- cal excitation in the UV-visible spectrum, Phys. Rev. A 108, 053110 (2023)

work page 2023
[40]

J. K. Krondorfer, M. Diez, and A. W. Hauser, Optical nuclear electric resonance in LiNa: selective addressing of nuclear spins through pulsed lasers, Phys. Scr.99, 075307 (2024)

work page 2024
[41]

J. K. Krondorfer, S. Pucher, M. Diez, S. Blatt, and A. W. Hauser, Optical nuclear electric resonance as single qubit gate for trapped neutral atoms, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics58, 235001 (2025)

work page 2025
[42]

S. Taie, R. Yamazaki, S. Sugawa, and Y. Takahashi, An su(6) mott insulator of an atomic fermi gas realized by large-spin pomeranchuk cooling, Nature Physics8, 825 (2012)

work page 2012
[43]

Scazza, C

F. Scazza, C. Hofrichter, M. H¨ ofer, P. C. De Groot, I. Bloch, and S. F¨ olling, Observation of two-orbital spin- exchange interactions with ultracold su(n)-symmetric fermions, Nature Physics10, 779 (2014)

work page 2014
[44]

M. A. Cazalilla, A. F. Ho, and M. Ueda, Ultracold gases of ytterbium: ferromagnetism and mott states in an su(6) fermi system, New Journal of Physics11, 103033 (2009)

work page 2009
[45]

D. Xiao, J. Li, W. C. Campbell, T. Dellaert, P. McMillin, A. Ransford, C. Roman, and A. Derevianko, Hyperfine structure of 173Yb+: Toward resolving the 173Yb nuclear- octupole-moment puzzle, Phys. Rev. A102, 022810 (2020)

work page 2020
[46]

Abdel Karim, A

O. Abdel Karim, A. Muzi Falconi, R. Panza, W. Liu, and F. Scazza, Single-atom imaging of 173yb in optical tweez- ers loaded by a five-beam magneto-optical trap, Quan- tum Science and Technology10, 045019 (2025)

work page 2025
[47]

C. W. Hoyt, Z. W. Barber, C. W. Oates, T. M. Fortier, S. A. Diddams, and L. Hollberg, Observation and ab- solute frequency measurements of the 1s0−3p0 optical clock transition in neutral ytterbium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 083003 (2005)

work page 2005
[48]

Abdel Karim, A

O. Abdel Karim, A. Muzi Falconi, R. Panza, W. Liu, and F. Scazza, Single-atom imaging of 173ybin optical tweez- ers loaded by a five-beam magneto-optical trap, Quan- tum Science and Technology10, 045019 (2025)

work page 2025
[49]

Brylinski and R

J.-L. Brylinski and R. Brylinski, Universal quantum gates, inMathematics of Quantum Computation, edited by R. Brylinski and G. Chen (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 2002) pp. 101–116

work page 2002
[50]

Kuwamoto, K

T. Kuwamoto, K. Honda, Y. Takahashi, and T. Yabuzaki, Magneto-optical trapping of yb atoms using an intercombination transition, Phys. Rev. A60, R745 (1999)

work page 1999
[51]

Stone, Table of nuclear magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Ta- bles90, 75 (2005)

N. Stone, Table of nuclear magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole moments, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Ta- bles90, 75 (2005)

work page 2005
[52]

P. E. Atkinson, J. S. Schelfhout, and J. J. Mc- Ferran, Hyperfine constants and line separations for the 1s0-3p1 intercombination line in neutral ytterbium with sub-doppler resolution, Physical Review A100, 10.1103/physreva.100.042505 (2019)

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.100.042505 2019
[53]

Paulisch, H

V. Paulisch, H. Rui, H. K. Ng, and B.-G. Englert, Beyond adiabatic elimination: A hierarchy of approximations for multi-photon processes, The European Physical Journal Plus129, 12 (2014)

work page 2014
[54]

Aymar, C

M. Aymar, C. H. Greene, and E. Luc-Koenig, Multichan- nel rydberg spectroscopy of complex atoms, Reviews of Modern Physics68, 1015 (1996)

work page 1996
[55]

Peper, Y

M. Peper, Y. Li, D. Y. Knapp, M. Bileska, S. Ma, G. Liu, P. Peng, B. Zhang, S. P. Horvath, A. P. Burgers, and J. D. Thompson, Spectroscopy and modeling of 171Yb rydberg states for high-fidelity two-qubit gates, Phys. Rev. X15, 011009 (2025)

work page 2025
[56]

Kuroda, V

R. Kuroda, V. M. Hughes, M. Poitrinal, M. Peper, and J. D. Thompson, Microwave spectroscopy and multichan- nel quantum defect analysis of ytterbium 6 snp, 6 snf, and 6 sng rydberg states, Physical Review A112, 042817 (2025)

work page 2025
[57]

Robicheaux, D

F. Robicheaux, D. Booth, and M. Saffman, Theory of long-range interactions for rydberg states attached to hyperfine-split cores, Physical Review A97, 022508 (2018). 17

work page 2018
[58]

Hummel, S

F. Hummel, S. Weber, J. M¨ ogerle, H. Menke, J. King, B. Bloom, S. Hofferberth, and M. Li, Engineer- ing rydberg-pair interactions in divalent atoms with hyperfine-split ionization thresholds, Physical Review A 110, 042821 (2024)

work page 2024
[59]

Levine, A

H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Semeghini, A. Omran, T. T. Wang, S. Ebadi, H. Bernien, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, H. Pichler,et al., Parallel implementation of high-fidelity multiqubit gates with neutral atoms, Physical review let- ters123, 170503 (2019)

work page 2019
[60]

Jandura and G

S. Jandura and G. Pupillo, Time-optimal two-and three- qubit gates for rydberg atoms, Quantum6, 712 (2022)

work page 2022
[61]

Letellier, ´A

H. Letellier, ´A. Mitchell Galv˜ ao de Melo, A. Dorne, and R. Kaiser, Loading of a large yb mot on the 1s0→1p1 transition, Review of Scientific Instruments94, 123203 (2023)

work page 2023
[62]

W. R. S. Garton, F. S. Tomkins, and H. M. Crosswhite, Magnetic effects in ba i and sr i absorption spectra, Pro- ceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Math- ematical and Physical Sciences373, 189 (1980)

work page 1980
[63]

Neukammer, H

J. Neukammer, H. Rinneberg, and U. Majewski, Diamag- netic shift and singlet–triplet mixing of yb rydberg states with large radial extent, Phys. Rev. A30, 1142 (1984)

work page 1984
[64]

T. Pohl, H. R. Sadeghpour, and P. Schmelcher, Cold and ultracold rydberg atoms in strong magnetic fields, Physics Reports484, 181 (2009)

work page 2009
[65]

Robicheaux, Angular dependence of the interaction between two rydberg atoms, Phys

F. Robicheaux, Angular dependence of the interaction between two rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A97, 022508 (2018)

work page 2018
[66]

Reichenbach and I

I. Reichenbach and I. H. Deutsch, Sideband cooling while preserving coherences in the nuclear spin state in group- ii-like atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 123001 (2007)

work page 2007
[67]

Shi, Coherence-preserving cooling of nuclear-spin qubits in a weak magnetic field, Phys

X.-F. Shi, Coherence-preserving cooling of nuclear-spin qubits in a weak magnetic field, Phys. Rev. A107, 023102 (2023)

work page 2023
[68]

S. J. Glaser, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, C. P. Koch, W. K¨ ockenberger, R. Kosloff, I. Kuprov, B. Luy, S. Schirmer, T. Schulte-Herbr¨ uggen, D. Sugny, and F. K. Wilhelm, Training Schr¨ odinger’s cat: quantum opti- mal control, The European Physical Journal D69, 279 (2015)

work page 2015
[69]

C. P. Koch, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, G. Dirr, S. Fil- ipp, S. J. Glaser, R. Kosloff, S. Montangero, T. Schulte- Herbr¨ uggen, D. Sugny, and F. K. Wilhelm, Quantum op- timal control in quantum technologies. strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in Eu- rope, EPJ Quantum Technology9, 19 (2022)

work page 2022
[70]

S. G. Porsev, Y. G. Rakhlina, and M. G. Kozlov, Electric- dipole amplitudes, lifetimes, and polarizabilities of the low-lying levels of atomic ytterbium, Phys. Rev. A60, 2781 (1999)

work page 1999
[71]

Banerjee, U

A. Banerjee, U. D. Rapol, D. Das, A. Krishna, and V. Natarajan, Precise measurements of uv atomic lines: Hyperfine structure and isotope shifts in the 398.8 nm line of yb, Europhysics Letters63, 340 (2003)

work page 2003