pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09736 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Taming the infrared in de Sitter space: autonomous equations, stochastic approach, and Borel resummation

Alexander Kamenshchik , Polina Petriakova , Tereza Vardanyan
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords de Sitter spaceinfrared divergencesautonomous equationsBorel resummationstochastic approachself-interacting scalar fieldSchwinger-Dyson equationscorrelation functions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Applying autonomous equations to the Borel-Le Roy transforms of correlation functions yields time evolutions that match the stochastic theory more closely in de Sitter space.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Perturbative series for correlation functions of a massless self-interacting scalar field in de Sitter space suffer from infrared divergences. The authors introduce autonomous equations derived from truncating Schwinger-Dyson differential equations to produce finite time-dependent approximations. These approximations reasonably track the evolution seen in the stochastic formulation. Applying the autonomous equations instead to the Borel-Le Roy transforms of the series and then resumming produces results that agree substantially better with the stochastic time evolution. This combination offers a practical way to extract non-perturbative information from the divergent series.

Core claim

We use autonomous equations to obtain finite time-dependent functions from the divergent perturbative series, which approximate the time evolution of correlation functions in the stochastic theory reasonably well. We further apply the autonomous equations to the Borel-Le Roy transforms of the correlation functions and use the resulting solutions to perform Borel resummation, finding that this procedure matches the stochastic time evolution substantially better. We also provide an alternative method for extracting perturbative coefficients and a new derivation of the autonomous equations via truncation of the Schwinger-Dyson system.

What carries the argument

Autonomous equations, obtained by truncating the system of Schwinger-Dyson-type differential equations for the correlation functions, applied to either the functions themselves or to their Borel-Le Roy transforms for resummation.

If this is right

  • The direct use of autonomous equations already gives reasonable approximations to stochastic dynamics.
  • Borel resummation combined with autonomous equations significantly improves the accuracy of the time evolution.
  • The truncation method provides a new way to derive the autonomous equations.
  • An alternative procedure is proposed for extracting the coefficients in the perturbative expansion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This technique could be useful for studying other infrared-sensitive quantities in de Sitter or inflationary cosmology.
  • It suggests that combining resummation techniques with differential equation truncations may be effective in other perturbative QFT contexts with divergent series.
  • Further validation could come from comparing against full numerical stochastic simulations at very late times.

Load-bearing premise

Truncating the Schwinger-Dyson system of equations to obtain a closed autonomous system captures the essential non-perturbative dynamics of the correlation functions.

What would settle it

Computing the correlation functions numerically from the full stochastic differential equations or from a higher number of perturbative orders and comparing the late-time behavior to the resummed autonomous results would test the claimed improvement in agreement.

read the original abstract

We investigate the divergent perturbative series of correlation functions for a massless, self-interacting scalar field in de Sitter space. First, we use our previously proposed method of autonomous equations to obtain finite time-dependent functions, and show that these functions approximate the time evolution of the correlation functions of the stochastic theory reasonably well. Second, we apply the technique of autonomous equations to the Borel-Le Roy transforms of correlation functions, and use solutions of these equations to perform Borel resummation. The results match the time evolution obtained in the stochastic picture substantially better. In addition, we propose an alternative method for extracting perturbative coefficients and provide a new derivation of our autonomous equation by truncating a system of Schwinger-Dyson-type differential equations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates divergent perturbative series for correlation functions of a massless self-interacting scalar field in de Sitter space. It applies previously proposed autonomous equations (obtained via truncation of Schwinger-Dyson-type equations) to generate finite time-dependent functions that approximate the stochastic theory's time evolution reasonably well. It then applies the autonomous equations to Borel-Le Roy transforms of the correlation functions to perform Borel resummation, claiming substantially improved matching to the stochastic time evolution. The work also proposes an alternative method for extracting perturbative coefficients and provides a new derivation of the autonomous equations.

Significance. If the truncation is controlled and the improved matching is robust rather than truncation-dependent, the approach would offer a useful non-perturbative tool for handling IR dynamics in de Sitter space, bridging perturbative expansions with stochastic descriptions. This could have implications for cosmological applications involving light scalars during inflation. The combination of autonomous equations with Borel-Le Roy resummation is a novel technical step that, if validated, merits further development.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section presenting the new derivation of the autonomous equation] The new derivation of the autonomous equations (via truncation of the Schwinger-Dyson-type system, as stated in the abstract and detailed in the relevant derivation section): no explicit truncation rule, selection criterion for retained terms, or error estimate for omitted contributions in the de Sitter IR regime is provided. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the substantially better agreement with stochastic time evolution could be an artifact of the specific truncation chosen rather than a capture of essential non-perturbative dynamics. A benchmark against the untruncated system or an estimate of neglected terms' impact on late-time behavior is needed.
  2. [Results section on Borel resummation and stochastic comparison] Comparison of time evolutions (in the results section showing stochastic matching): the improvement from applying autonomous equations to Borel-Le Roy transforms is described qualitatively as 'substantially better.' Quantitative metrics (e.g., integrated relative error or pointwise deviation from the stochastic curve over the time range) would be required to substantiate the strength of the improvement and rule out post-hoc tuning effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'our previously proposed method' without a citation; adding the reference would aid readers in connecting to prior work.
  2. [Section introducing Borel-Le Roy transforms] Notation for the Borel-Le Roy transform and the autonomous equations should be defined consistently with a clear mapping to the original correlation functions to avoid ambiguity in the resummation procedure.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where necessary to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section presenting the new derivation of the autonomous equation] The new derivation of the autonomous equations (via truncation of the Schwinger-Dyson-type system, as stated in the abstract and detailed in the relevant derivation section): no explicit truncation rule, selection criterion for retained terms, or error estimate for omitted contributions in the de Sitter IR regime is provided. This is load-bearing for the central claim, as the substantially better agreement with stochastic time evolution could be an artifact of the specific truncation chosen rather than a capture of essential non-perturbative dynamics. A benchmark against the untruncated system or an estimate of neglected terms' impact on late-time behavior is needed.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for more explicit details on the truncation procedure. In our new derivation, the truncation is achieved by systematically discarding terms in the Schwinger-Dyson hierarchy that involve higher-point functions or derivatives that are subleading in the infrared limit, specifically retaining only the contributions that close the equation for the two-point function at leading order in the de Sitter expansion. While we did not include a formal error estimate in the original submission, we can provide one by comparing the results to those obtained with a less aggressive truncation (e.g., including next-to-leading terms where possible). We will revise the derivation section to include an explicit statement of the truncation rule, the selection criterion based on IR scaling dimensions, and a benchmark comparison showing the stability of the late-time behavior under variations in the truncation. This addresses the concern that the agreement might be truncation-dependent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results section on Borel resummation and stochastic comparison] Comparison of time evolutions (in the results section showing stochastic matching): the improvement from applying autonomous equations to Borel-Le Roy transforms is described qualitatively as 'substantially better.' Quantitative metrics (e.g., integrated relative error or pointwise deviation from the stochastic curve over the time range) would be required to substantiate the strength of the improvement and rule out post-hoc tuning effects.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative measures would provide stronger evidence for the improvement. In the revised manuscript, we will add quantitative metrics, including the integrated relative error (defined as the time integral of |f_autonomous(t) - f_stochastic(t)| / f_stochastic(t)) and the maximum pointwise deviation over the simulated time range. These will be computed for both the direct autonomous equations and the Borel-resummed versions, allowing a direct comparison of the accuracy. This will help demonstrate that the improvement is robust and not due to any tuning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation of autonomous equations method, but new derivation and external stochastic benchmark keep derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper references its prior work when introducing the autonomous equations method but immediately supplies an independent derivation obtained by truncating a Schwinger-Dyson-type system. The central results consist of solving these equations (both directly and after Borel-Le Roy transformation) and comparing the resulting time evolution against the stochastic picture, which functions as an external, non-self-referential benchmark. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction to its own input by construction, nor does any uniqueness theorem or ansatz rest solely on an unverified self-citation chain. This constitutes at most a minor, non-load-bearing self-reference.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The truncation of Schwinger-Dyson equations implicitly assumes that higher-order terms can be neglected without loss of essential dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 1216 out tokens · 32920 ms · 2026-05-12T03:21:26.699866+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    N. A. Chernikov and E. A. Tagirov, Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A9, 109 (1968)

    work page 1968

  2. [2]

    E. A. Tagirov, Consequences of field quantization in de Sitter type cosmological models, Ann. Phys.76, 561 (1973)

    work page 1973

  3. [3]

    Schomblond and P

    C. Schomblond and P. Spindel, Unicity Conditions of the Scalar Field Propagator Delta(1) (x,y) in de Sitter Universe, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor.25, 67 (1976)

    work page 1976

  4. [4]

    T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting, Proc. R. Soc. A360, 117 (1978)

    work page 1978

  5. [5]

    Allen, Phys

    B. Allen, Phys. Rev. D32, Vacuum States in de Sitter Space, 3136 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Allen and A

    B. Allen and A. Follaci, The Massless Minimally Coupled Scalar Field in De Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D35, 3771 (1987)

    work page 1987

  7. [7]

    J. Bros, U. Moschella and J. P. Gazeau, Quantum field theory in the de Sitter universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 1746 (1994). – 22 –

    work page 1994

  8. [8]

    Bros and U

    J. Bros and U. Moschella, Two point functions and quantum fields in de Sitter universe, Rev. Math. Phys.8, 327 (1996)

    work page 1996

  9. [9]

    J. Bros, H. Epstein and U. Moschella, Analyticity properties and thermal effects for general quantum field theory on de Sitter space-time, Commun. Math. Phys.196, 535 (1998)

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    E. T. Akhmedov, U. Moschella and F. K. Popov, Characters of different secular effects in various patches of de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D99, 086009 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    S. L. Cacciatori, H. Epstein and U. Moschella, Loops in de Sitter space, JHEP07, 182 (2024)

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Stochastic de Sitter (Inflationary) Stage in the Early Universe, Lect. Notes Phys.246, 107 (1986)

    work page 1986

  13. [13]

    A. A. Starobinsky, J. Yokoyama, Equilibrium state of a self-interacting scalar field in the de Sitter background, Phys. Rev. D50, 6357 (1994)

    work page 1994

  14. [14]

    Finelli, G

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca and G. Venturi, Generation of fluctuations during inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches, Phys. Rev. D79, 044007 (2009)

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    Finelli, G

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca and G. Venturi, Stochastic growth of quantum fluctuations during slow-roll inflation, Phys. Rev. D82, 064020 (2010)

    work page 2010

  16. [16]

    Vennin and A

    V. Vennin and A. A. Starobinsky, Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation, Eur. J. Phys. C75, 413 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    N. C. Tsamis and R. P. Woodard, Stochastic quantum gravitational inflation, Nucl. Phys. B 724, 295 (2005)

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    Prokopec, N

    T. Prokopec, N. Tsamis and R. Woodard, Stochastic Inflationary Scalar Electrodynamics, Ann. Phys. (Amsterdam)3231324 (2008)

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Collins, R

    H. Collins, R. Holman and T. Vardanyan, The quantum Fokker-Planck equation of stochastic inflation, JHEP11, 065 (2017)

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato and M. Williams, EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical, JHEP03, 090 (2015)

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman and G. Tasinato, Open EFTs, IR effects & late-time resummations: systematic corrections in stochastic inflation, JHEP01, 153 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Tokuda and T

    J. Tokuda and T. Tanaka, Statistical nature of infrared dynamics on de Sitter background, JCAP02, 014 (2018)

    work page 2018

  23. [23]

    Pinol, S

    L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and Y. Tada, A manifestly covariant theory of multifield stochastic inflation in phase space: solving the discretisation ambiguity in stochastic inflation, JCAP 04, 048 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Baumgart and R

    M. Baumgart and R. Sundrum, De Sitter Diagrammar and the Resummation of Time, JHEP 07, 119 (2020)

    work page 2020

  25. [25]

    Gorbenko and L

    V. Gorbenko and L. Senatore,λϕ 4 in dS, arXiv: 1911.00022 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 1911

  26. [26]

    P. R. Woodard, Recent Developments in Stochastic Inflation, arXiv: 2501.15843

    work page arXiv

  27. [27]

    Risken,The Fokker-Planck equation(Springer, New York, 1989)

    H. Risken,The Fokker-Planck equation(Springer, New York, 1989). – 23 –

    work page 1989

  28. [28]

    Yang and D

    C.-N. Yang and D. Feldman, The S Matrix in the Heisenberg Representation, Phys. Rev.79, 972 (1950)

    work page 1950

  29. [29]

    P. R. Woodard, A Leading logarithm approximation for inflationary quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.148, 108 (2005)

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    J. S. Schwinger, Brownian motion of a quantum oscillator, J. Math. Phys.2, 407 (1961)

    work page 1961

  31. [31]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram Technique for Nonequilibrium Processes, Sov. Phys. JETP20, 1018 (1965)

    work page 1965

  32. [32]

    P. M. Bakshi and K. T. Mahanthappa, Expectation value formalism in quantum field theory. 1., J. Math. Phys.4, 1 (1963)

    work page 1963

  33. [33]

    P. M. Bakshi and K. T. Mahanthappa, Expectation value formalism in quantum field theory. 2., J. Math. Phys.4, 12 (1963)

    work page 1963

  34. [34]

    R. D. Jordan, Effective Field Equations for Expectation Values, Phys. Rev. D33, 444 (1986)

    work page 1986

  35. [35]

    Collins, Primordial non-Gaussianities from inflation, arXiv: 1101.1308 [astro-ph.CO]

    H. Collins, Primordial non-Gaussianities from inflation, arXiv: 1101.1308 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  36. [36]

    A. Yu. Kamenshchik and T. Vardanyan, Renormalization group inspired autonomous equations for secular effects in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D102, 065010 (2020)

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    A. Yu. Kamenshchik, A. A. Starobinsky and T. Vardanyan, Massive scalar field in de Sitter spacetime: a two-loop calculation and a comparison with the stochastic approach, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 345 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    V. K. Onemli, Vacuum Fluctuations of a Scalar Field during Inflation: Quantum versus Stochastic Analysis, Phys. Rev. D91, 103537 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [39]

    Karakaya and V

    G. Karakaya and V. K. Onemli, Quantum effects of mass on scalar field correlations, power spectrum, and fluctuations during inflation, Phys. Rev. D97, 12, 123531 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Karakaya and V

    G. Karakaya and V. K. Onemli, Quantum Fluctuations of a Self-interacting Inflaton, arXiv: 1912.07963 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 1912

  41. [41]

    Kamenshchik and P

    A. Kamenshchik and P. Petriakova, IR finite correlation functions in de Sitter space, a smooth massless limit, and an autonomous equation, JHEP04, 127 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Karakaya, Non-perturbative results for a massive scalar field during de Sitter inflation, arXiv: 2509.24379 [gr-qc]

    G. Karakaya, Non-perturbative results for a massive scalar field during de Sitter inflation, arXiv: 2509.24379 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  43. [43]

    Petriakova, (Non-)perturbative techniques in de Sitter space, PhD thesis, University of Bologna (2026)

    P. Petriakova, (Non-)perturbative techniques in de Sitter space, PhD thesis, University of Bologna (2026)

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    Kamenshchik and P

    A. Kamenshchik and P. Petriakova, From the Fokker-Planck equation to perturbative QFT’s results in de Sitter space, JHEP08, 063 (2025)

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    N. N. Bogolyubov and D.V. Shirkov, The renormalization group - it is very simple!, Priroda 8, 3 (1984) (in Russian)

    work page 1984

  46. [46]

    D. V. Shirkov, The Bogolyubov renormalization group in theoretical and mathematical physics, arXiv: hep-th/9903073

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    K. G. Wilson and J. B. Kogut, The Renormalization group and the epsilon expansion, Phys. Rep.12, 75 (1974)

    work page 1974

  48. [48]

    D. V. Shirkov and V. F. Kovalev, Bogolyubov renormalization group and symmetry of solution in mathematical physics, Phys. Rep.352, 219 (2001). – 24 –

    work page 2001

  49. [49]

    L. Y. Chen, N. Goldenfeld and Y. Oono, The Renormalization group and singular perturbations: Multiple scales, boundary layers and reductive perturbation theory, Phys. Rev. E54, 376 (1996)

    work page 1996

  50. [50]

    C. P. Burgess, L. Leblond, R. Holman and S. Shandera, Super-Hubble de Sitter Fluctuations and the Dynamical RG, JCAP03, 033 (2010)

    work page 2010

  51. [51]

    Bhattacharya, Massless minimal quantum scalar field with an asymmetric self interaction in de Sitter spacetime, JCAP09, 041 (2022)

    S. Bhattacharya, Massless minimal quantum scalar field with an asymmetric self interaction in de Sitter spacetime, JCAP09, 041 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Bhattacharya and N

    S. Bhattacharya and N. Joshi, Non-perturbative analysis for a massless minimal quantum scalar withV(ϕ) =λϕ 4/4! +βm 2/3! in the inflationary de Sitter spacetime, JCAP03, 058 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Bhattacharya and M

    S. Bhattacharya and M. D. Choudhury, Non-perturbative⟨ϕ⟩,⟨ϕ 2⟩and the dynamically generated scalar mass with Yukawa interaction in the inflationary de Sitter spacetime, JCAP 01, 056 (2024)

    work page 2024

  54. [54]

    Honda, R

    M. Honda, R. Jinno, L. Pinol and K. Tokeshi, Borel resummation of secular divergences in stochastic inflation, JHEP08, 060 (2023)

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    B. Fiol, E. Gijon and U. L. Alonso, Schwinger-Dyson approximants, JHEP02, 111 (2026)

    work page 2026

  56. [56]

    dynamical mass

    M. Beneke and P. Moch, On “dynamical mass” generation in Euclidean de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D87, 064018 (2013)

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    A. A. Starobinsky, Dynamics of Phase Transition in the New Inflationary Universe Scenario and Generation of Perturbations, Phys. Lett.117B, 175 (1982)

    work page 1982

  58. [58]

    A. D. Linde, Scalar Field Fluctuations in Expanding Universe and the New Inflationary Universe Scenario, Phys. Lett.116B, 335 (1982)

    work page 1982

  59. [59]

    Vilenkin and L

    A. Vilenkin and L. H. Ford, Gravitational Effects upon Cosmological Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D26, 1231 (1982)

    work page 1982

  60. [60]

    Ford and A

    L.H. Ford and A. Vilenkin, Global Symmetry Breaking in Two-dimensional Flat Space-time and in De Sitter Space-time, Phys. Rev. D33, 2833 (1986)

    work page 1986

  61. [61]

    V. K. Onemli and R. P. Woodard, Superacceleration from massless, minimally coupledϕ 4, Class. Quantum Grav.19, 4607 (2002)

    work page 2002

  62. [62]

    Brunier, V

    T. Brunier, V. K. Onemli and R. P. Woodard, Two loop scalar self-mass during inflation, Class. Quantum Grav.22, 59 (2005)

    work page 2005

  63. [63]

    E. O. Kahya and V. K. Onemli, Quantum Stability of aw <−1 Phase of Cosmic Acceleration, Phys. Rev. D76, 043512 (2007)

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Borel,Memoire sur les series divergentes(Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1899)

    E. Borel,Memoire sur les series divergentes(Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1899)

    work page

  65. [65]

    G. H. Hardy,Divergent Series, 2nd edition(Clarendon, Oxford, 1956)

    work page 1956

  66. [66]

    C. M. Bender and S. A. Orszag,Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers(McGraw-Hill, 1978)

    work page 1978

  67. [67]

    I. M. Suslov, Divergent perturbation series, JETP100, 1188 (2005)

    work page 2005

  68. [68]

    Peng and H

    F. Peng and H. Shu, Truncating Dyson-Schwinger equations based on a Lefschetz thimble decomposition and Borel resummation, Phys. Rev. D1116, 065003 (2025)

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    V. I. Yukalov and S. Gluzman, Resolving the Problem of Multiple Control Parameters in Optimized Borel-Type Summation, J. Math. Chem.63, 181 (2025). – 25 –

    work page 2025

  70. [70]

    D. I. Kazakov, D. V. Shirkov and O. V. Tarasov, Analytical Continuation of Perturbative Results of theg 4 Model Into the RegiongIs Greater Than or Equal to 1, Theor. Math. Phys.38, 9 (1979)

    work page 1979

  71. [71]

    Yamada and K.S

    H.S. Yamada and K.S. Ikeda, A Numerical Test of Pad´ e Approximation for Some Functions with Singularity, arXiv:1308.4453

    work page arXiv

  72. [72]

    Zinn-Justin, Expansion Around Instantons in Quantum Mechanics, J

    J. Zinn-Justin, Expansion Around Instantons in Quantum Mechanics, J. Math. Phys.22, 511 (1981)

    work page 1981

  73. [73]

    Marolf and I

    D. Marolf and I. A. Morrison, The IR stability of de Sitter QFT: results at all orders, Phys. Rev. D84, 044040 (2011)

    work page 2011

  74. [74]

    Gautier and J

    F. Gautier and J. Serreau, Infrared dynamics in de Sitter space from Schwinger-Dyson equations, Phys. Lett. B727, 541 (2013)

    work page 2013

  75. [75]

    Hollands, Correlators, Feynman diagrams, and quantum no-hair in deSitter spacetime, Commun

    S. Hollands, Correlators, Feynman diagrams, and quantum no-hair in deSitter spacetime, Commun. Math. Phys.319, 1 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    E. T. Akhmedov, E. K. Popov and V. M. Slepukhin, Infrared dynamics of the massiveϕ 4 theory on de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D88, 024021 (2013)

    work page 2013

  77. [77]

    Garbrecht, G

    B. Garbrecht, G. Rigopoulos and Y. Zhu, Infrared correlations in de Sitter space: Field theoretic versus stochastic approach, Phys. Rev. D89, 063506 (2014)

    work page 2014

  78. [78]

    Gautier and J

    F. Gautier and J. Serreau, Scalar field correlator in de Sitter space at next-to-leading order in a 1/N expansion, Phys. Rev. D92, 105035 (2015)

    work page 2015

  79. [79]

    Markkanen, A

    T. Markkanen, A. Rajantie, S. Stopyra and T. Tenkanen, Scalar correlation functions in de Sitter space from the stochastic spectral expansion, JCAP08, 001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    Kitamoto, Infrared resummation for derivative interactions in de Sitter space, Phys

    H. Kitamoto, Infrared resummation for derivative interactions in de Sitter space, Phys. Rev. D100, 2, 025020 (2019)

    work page 2019

Showing first 80 references.