arxiv: 2605.10011 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Valley-contrasting Spin Textures in Janus Metal Phosphochalcogenides

Zeyu Yin , Li Liang , Zhichao Zhou , Xiao Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords Janus monolayersspin texturesvalleytronicsIsing spinWeyl spinRashba effectanomalous Hall effectstrain tuning

0 comments

The pith

Janus MP₂S₃Se₃ monolayers host Ising spin textures at K valleys and a Weyl-Rashba mix at the Γ valley due to symmetry breaking.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper uses first-principles calculations to show that Janus metal phosphochalcogenide monolayers display spin textures that change with valley in momentum space. Ising-type textures lock spins perpendicular to the plane at the K± points. The broken inversion symmetry from the Janus arrangement produces coexisting Weyl-type and Rashba-type textures at the Γ point. Valley contrast also appears in Berry-curvature-driven anomalous Hall currents and in optical selection rules. Strain can tune the relative energies of the Γ and K valleys as well as the band gaps. Readers care because the work identifies a single platform where spin and valley degrees of freedom can be addressed together.

Core claim

Via first-principles calculations, Janus MP₂S₃Se₃ monolayers exhibit distinct spin textures at different valleys. Ising-type spin textures are located at K± valleys, while the symmetry breaking from the Janus structure brings about a coexistence of Weyl-type and Rashba-type spin textures at Γ valley. In addition to valley-contrasting spin textures, valley dependence also occurs in Berry-curvature-driven anomalous Hall currents and optical selectivity. Energy differences between Γ and K±, as well as band gaps, are highly tunable by applied strain.

What carries the argument

The Janus-induced breaking of inversion symmetry, which generates valley-specific momentum-resolved spin textures (Ising at K± and mixed Weyl-Rashba at Γ).

If this is right

Anomalous Hall currents driven by Berry curvature vary with valley.
Optical transitions show valley-dependent circular selectivity.
Applied strain shifts the energy separation between Γ and K± valleys and alters the band gaps.
The spin-valley coupling opens routes to devices that address both degrees of freedom in one material.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar multi-texture behavior may appear in other Janus transition-metal dichalcogenides or phosphochalcogenides once symmetry is broken.
Electrical gating or heterostructure stacking could provide external knobs to select or switch between the observed spin textures.
Strain engineering demonstrated here suggests a route to mechanically tunable valley filters in flexible 2D devices.
The coexistence of three spin-texture families in one Brillouin zone may enable new spin-filtering or spin-to-charge conversion schemes not possible in conventional valley materials.

Load-bearing premise

First-principles calculations correctly capture the momentum-resolved spin textures, their valley contrasts, and strain responses without major errors from the exchange-correlation functional or omitted many-body corrections.

What would settle it

Spin- and angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy that fails to resolve Ising-type out-of-plane spin polarization at the K valleys or mixed in-plane and out-of-plane components at Γ would falsify the predicted textures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10011 by Li Liang, Xiao Li, Zeyu Yin, Zhichao Zhou.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Spin textures of the lower states of the spin-split [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Valley-contrasting transport and optical proper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolutions of band gaps and relative energies between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Momentum-resolved spin textures and potential valley-contrasting physical properties in the momentum space are two intriguing characteristics of noncentrosymmetric materials, and they have broad applications in spintronics and valleytronics. The realization of diverse spin textures within a single material, along with their further coupling to the valley degree of freedom, is highly desirable. Via first-principles calculations, we investigate electronic properties of Janus MP$_2$S$_3$Se$_3$ monolayers, which exhibits distinct spin textures at different valleys. While Ising-type spin textures are located at $K_\pm$ valleys, the symmetry breaking from the Janus structure brings about a coexistence of Weyl-type and Rashba-type spin textures at $\Gamma$ valley. In addition to valley-contrasting spin textures, valley dependence also occurs in Berry-curvature-driven anomalous Hall currents and optical selectivity. Besides, energy differences between $\Gamma$ and $K_\pm$, as well as band gaps, are highly tunable by applied strain. These findings present an intriguing coupling between diverse spin textures and multiple valleys, and pave the way for designing advanced electronic devices that leverage spin and valley degrees of freedom.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper identifies a Janus MP2S3Se3 monolayer with Ising textures at K valleys and coexisting Weyl plus Rashba textures at Gamma, but the DFT results lack any reported benchmarks or convergence checks.

read the letter

The central new result is the prediction that Janus MP2S3Se3 monolayers host Ising-type spin textures at the K valleys while the Gamma valley shows both Weyl-type and Rashba-type textures because of the out-of-plane asymmetry. The work also links this to valley-dependent Berry curvature and optical selection rules, and shows that strain can shift the relative energies of Gamma and K bands as well as the gap size. That combination of multiple spin textures inside one material class is not something I recall from earlier papers on similar phosphochalcogenides, so the specific mapping is fresh. The strain tunability is a practical detail that device-oriented readers will notice. The calculations are standard first-principles work, and the authors correctly flag the symmetry-breaking role of the Janus structure. That part is straightforward and internally consistent. The soft spot is the complete absence of any methodological detail or validation. The abstract mentions first-principles calculations but says nothing about the exchange-correlation functional, spin-orbit treatment, k-mesh density, or tests against known benchmarks for spin textures. Momentum-resolved spin expectation values can shift with those choices, so the clean classification into Weyl, Rashba, and Ising types needs to be shown to survive reasonable variations. Without that, the central claim stays provisional. This paper is for people already working on 2D valleytronics or spin-orbit materials who want a concrete candidate to model further or grow. A reader looking for new platforms with coupled spin and valley degrees of freedom will find something to think about, but anyone planning experiments will want the full methods and robustness checks first. It is worth sending to referees because the material platform is specific and the symmetry argument is clear, even though the computational validation will need strengthening.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports first-principles calculations on Janus MP₂S₃Se₃ monolayers, claiming distinct valley-contrasting spin textures: Ising-type at the K± valleys and a coexistence of Weyl-type and Rashba-type textures at the Γ valley arising from Janus-induced symmetry breaking. It further asserts valley dependence in Berry-curvature-driven anomalous Hall currents and optical selectivity, plus strain tunability of Γ–K energy differences and band gaps. These features are positioned as enabling spin-valleytronic device concepts.

Significance. If the computed spin textures and their valley contrast prove robust, the work would establish a single 2D platform hosting multiple distinct spin-texture types coupled to valleys, extending beyond conventional Ising or Rashba systems. The strain tunability and predicted valley-selective transport/optical responses would strengthen the case for practical spin-valley coupling in phosphochalcogenide monolayers. The first-principles approach to predicting these momentum-resolved features is a clear strength when properly validated.

major comments (3)

[Methods] Methods/Computational Details: The manuscript states that results are obtained from first-principles calculations but supplies no information on the exchange-correlation functional, spin-orbit coupling implementation, k-point mesh density, plane-wave cutoff, or convergence tests. Because the central claims rest on the precise classification of momentum-resolved spin textures ⟨σ⟩(k) (Ising at K± versus coexisting Weyl+Rashba at Γ), the absence of these details is load-bearing; spin textures are known to shift with semilocal versus hybrid functionals and with k-sampling.
[Results] Results on spin textures (likely §3 or Fig. 2–4): The assignment of Weyl-type and Rashba-type components at Γ is presented without quantitative benchmarks (e.g., comparison to analytic models or to well-studied Janus monolayers such as MoSSe) or tests under functional variation. This directly affects the claim that the Janus structure produces a stable coexistence of these textures rather than an artifact of the chosen DFT setup.
[Results] Berry curvature and anomalous Hall section (likely §4): Valley-dependent anomalous Hall currents are asserted on the basis of the same unvalidated band structures. Without reported convergence of the Berry curvature integral with respect to k-mesh or functional, the quantitative valley contrast in transport cannot be considered established.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Notation for the two K valleys is written as K± in the abstract but should be standardized (K+ / K−) throughout the text and figures for clarity.
[Figures] Figure captions for spin-texture plots should explicitly state the energy window or band index used for the momentum-resolved ⟨σ⟩(k) maps.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that additional computational details and validation are needed to support the claims on spin textures and transport properties. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Methods] The manuscript states that results are obtained from first-principles calculations but supplies no information on the exchange-correlation functional, spin-orbit coupling implementation, k-point mesh density, plane-wave cutoff, or convergence tests. Because the central claims rest on the precise classification of momentum-resolved spin textures ⟨σ⟩(k) (Ising at K± versus coexisting Weyl+Rashba at Γ), the absence of these details is load-bearing; spin textures are known to shift with semilocal versus hybrid functionals and with k-sampling.

Authors: We agree that these details are essential for reproducibility and to validate the spin-texture classifications. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated Computational Methods section that specifies the exchange-correlation functional, the treatment of spin-orbit coupling, the k-point mesh, plane-wave cutoff, and convergence criteria employed in our calculations. We will also include explicit tests demonstrating that the Ising, Weyl, and Rashba spin textures remain qualitatively unchanged under moderate variations in k-sampling and other parameters. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] The assignment of Weyl-type and Rashba-type components at Γ is presented without quantitative benchmarks (e.g., comparison to analytic models or to well-studied Janus monolayers such as MoSSe) or tests under functional variation. This directly affects the claim that the Janus structure produces a stable coexistence of these textures rather than an artifact of the chosen DFT setup.

Authors: We acknowledge the value of quantitative benchmarks. The revised manuscript will incorporate a decomposition of the Γ-point spin texture into its Weyl-like (linear dispersion) and Rashba-like (helical) components, with explicit fitting parameters. We will also add a direct comparison to the spin textures reported for the benchmark Janus monolayer MoSSe and will perform additional calculations with a hybrid functional to confirm that the coexistence of textures is robust and not an artifact of the semilocal functional. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Valley-dependent anomalous Hall currents are asserted on the basis of the same unvalidated band structures. Without reported convergence of the Berry curvature integral with respect to k-mesh or functional, the quantitative valley contrast in transport cannot be considered established.

Authors: We agree that convergence must be demonstrated. In the revision we will present the anomalous Hall conductivity and its valley contrast as a function of k-mesh density, showing that the reported valley dependence stabilizes with denser sampling. We will also note the functional dependence and any additional checks performed to establish the robustness of the valley-selective transport features. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct outputs of standard first-principles DFT

full rationale

The paper derives its central claims (Ising spin textures at K± valleys, coexisting Weyl+Rashba textures at Γ, valley-dependent Berry curvature and optical selectivity, strain tunability) exclusively via first-principles calculations on the Janus MP₂S₃Se₃ monolayers. These are external numerical evaluations of the Kohn-Sham Hamiltonian, spin expectation values ⟨σ⟩(k), Berry curvature, and optical matrix elements; none of the reported quantities are obtained by fitting to the target observables, by self-definition, or by renaming a prior result. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, an ansatz smuggled via citation, or a uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' own prior work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard density functional theory assumptions for electronic structure in 2D materials. No new entities are postulated. Strain is treated as an external tunable parameter rather than a fitted one.

free parameters (1)

applied strain
Strain values are varied to tune energies and gaps but are external control parameters, not fitted to match the spin texture results.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard DFT approximations (exchange-correlation functional and pseudopotentials) are sufficient to capture spin textures and Berry curvature in these monolayers.
Invoked implicitly by the use of first-principles calculations to predict momentum-resolved properties.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5510 in / 1336 out tokens · 40802 ms · 2026-05-12T02:55:33.858803+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

Manchon, H

A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, Nat. Mater.14, 871 (2015)

work page 2015
[2]

J. Chen, K. Wu, W. Hu, and J. Yang, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.12, 12256 (2021)

work page 2021
[3]

F. T. Vasko, JETP Letters30, 541 (1979)

work page 1979
[4]

Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, JETP Letters39, 78 (1984)

work page 1984
[5]

Nitta, T

J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, and T. Enoki, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1335 (1997)

work page 1997
[6]

Z. Y. Zhu, Y. C. Cheng, and U. Schwingenschl¨ ogl, Phys. Rev. B84, 153402 (2011)

work page 2011
[7]

Xiao, G.-B

D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 196802 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

Hirayama, R

M. Hirayama, R. Okugawa, S. Ishibashi, S. Murakami, and T. Miyake, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 206401 (2015)

work page 2015
[9]

Sakano, M

M. Sakano, M. Hirayama, T. Takahashi, S. Akebi, M. Nakayama, K. Kuroda, K. Taguchi, T. Yoshikawa, K. Miyamoto, T. Okuda, K. Ono, H. Kumigashira, T. Ideue, Y. Iwasa, N. Mitsuishi, K. Ishizaka, S. Shin, T. Miyake, S. Murakami, T. Sasagawa, and T. Kondo, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 136404 (2020)

work page 2020
[10]

Gatti, D

G. Gatti, D. Gos´ albez-Mart´ ınez, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Fan- ciulli, M. Puppin, S. Polishchuk, S. Moser, L. Testa, E. Martino, S. Roth, P. Bugnon, L. Moreschini, A. Bost- wick, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, G. Di Santo, L. Petaccia, I. Vobornik, J. Fujii, J. Wong, D. Jariwala, H. A. Atwa- ter, H. M. Rønnow, M. Chergui, O. V. Yazyev, M. Grioni, and A. Crepaldi, ...

work page 2020
[11]

Liang, Z

L. Liang, Z. Zhou, J. Zhang, and X. Li, Newton2, 100341 (2026)

work page 2026
[12]

Saito, Y

Y. Saito, Y. Nakamura, M. S. Bahramy, Y. Kohama, J. Ye, Y. Kasahara, Y. Nakagawa, M. Onga, M. Toku- naga, T. Nojima,et al., Nat. Phys.12, 144 (2016)

work page 2016
[13]

Mahfouzi, N

F. Mahfouzi, N. Nagaosa, and B. K. Nikoli´ c, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 166602 (2012)

work page 2012
[14]

S. C. de la Barrera, M. R. Sinko, D. P. Gopalan, N. Sivadas, K. L. Seyler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Xiao, J. Yan, D. G. Mandrus,et al., Nat. Commun. 9, 1868 (2018)

work page 2018
[15]

C. Wang, B. Lian, X. Guo, J. Mao, Z. Zhang, D. Zhang, B.-L. Gu, Y. Xu, and W. Duan, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 126402 (2019)

work page 2019
[16]

Weylet al., z

H. Weylet al., z. Phys56, 330 (1929)

work page 1929
[17]

J. A. Krieger, S. Stolz, I. Robredo, K. Manna, E. C. Mc- Farlane, M. Date, B. Pal, J. Yang, E. B. Guedes, J. H. Dil, C. M. Polley, M. Leandersson, C. Shekhar, H. Bor- rmann, Q. Yang, M. Lin, V. N. Strocov, M. Caputo, M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, C. Cacho, F. Mazzola, J. Fu- jii, I. Vobornik, S. S. P. Parkin, B. Bradlyn, C. Felser, M. G. Vergniory, and N. B. M...

work page 2024
[18]

Gatti, D

G. Gatti, D. Gos´ albez-Mart´ ınez, S. S. Tsirkin, M. Fan- 6 ciulli, M. Puppin, S. Polishchuk, S. Moser, L. Testa, E. Martino, S. Roth, P. Bugnon, L. Moreschini, A. Bost- wick, C. Jozwiak, E. Rotenberg, G. Di Santo, L. Petaccia, I. Vobornik, J. Fujii, J. Wong, D. Jariwala, H. A. Atwa- ter, H. M. Rønnow, M. Chergui, O. V. Yazyev, M. Grioni, and A. Crepaldi...

work page 2020
[19]

Chang, F

P.-H. Chang, F. Mahfouzi, N. Nagaosa, and B. K. Nikoli´ c, Phys. Rev. B89, 195418 (2014)

work page 2014
[20]

Feng, Y.-H

B. Feng, Y.-H. Chan, Y. Feng, R.-Y. Liu, M.-Y. Chou, K. Kuroda, K. Yaji, A. Harasawa, P. Moras, A. Barinov, et al., Phys. Rev. B94, 195134 (2016)

work page 2016
[21]

A. C. Riis-Jensen, M. Pandey, and K. S. Thygesen, J. Phys. Chem. C122, 24520 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

Zhang, H

Z. Zhang, H. Sun, M. Dong, Y. Guo, and M. Zhao, npj Comput. Mater.11, 277 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

J. Chen, K. Wu, H. Ma, W. Hu, and J. Yang, RSC Adv. 10, 6388 (2020)

work page 2020
[24]

M. M. Petri´ c, M. Kremser, M. Barbone, Y. Qin, Y. Sayyad, Y. Shen, S. Tongay, J. J. Finley, A. R. Botello- M´ endez, and K. M¨ uller, Phys. Rev. B103, 035414 (2021)

work page 2021
[25]

P.-F. Liu, F. Zheng, J. Li, J.-G. Si, L. Wei, J. Zhang, and B.-T. Wang, Phys. Rev. B105, 245420 (2022)

work page 2022
[26]

J. Magn. Magn. Mater.563, 169897 (2022)

work page 2022
[27]

T. Hu, F. Jia, G. Zhao, J. Wu, A. Stroppa, and W. Ren, Phys. Rev. B97, 235404 (2018)

work page 2018
[28]

Bhattacharjee and A

S. Bhattacharjee and A. Ghosh, Phys. Rev. B112, 245133 (2025)

work page 2025
[29]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

work page 1996
[30]

L. G. D. da Silveira, P. Barone, and S. Picozzi, Phys. Rev. B93, 245159 (2016)

work page 2016
[31]

B. D. Bhat, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter35, 435301 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

J. Heyd, G. E. Scuseria, and M. Ernzerhof, J. Chem. Phys.118, 8207 (2003)

work page 2003
[33]

See Supplemental Material for calculation details, the ratio of two types of spin textures at Γ valley, band struc- tures of the GeP 2S3Se3 monolayer using the HSE func- tional, and spin textures of other bands

work page
[34]

T. Cao, G. Wang, W. Han, H. Ye, C. Zhu, J. Shi, Q. Niu, P. Tan, E. Wang, B. Liu, and J. Feng, Nat. Commun.3, 887 (2012)

work page 2012