pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10089 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A molecular perspective on coordination, screening, and emergent length scales in lithium electrolytes

A. Coste, A. van Roekeghem, E. Zunzunegui-Bru, I. Skarmoutsos, S. Mossa

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords lithium electrolytesion coordinationelectrostatic screeningion clusteringcorrelated domainsmultiscale frameworkelectrolyte transportbattery electrolytes
0
0 comments X

The pith

Lithium electrolytes at high concentration couple local coordination, ion clustering, and electrostatic screening through shared correlated structures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This perspective develops a unified multiscale framework that connects local Li+ coordination motifs to mesoscopic ionic organization and macroscopic transport in lithium electrolytes. It shows that the usual separation of coordination chemistry, screening, and transport holds only at low concentration and fails as ions pair, cluster, and form correlated domains. Examples drawn from carbonate liquids, polymer electrolytes, concentrated mixtures, and confined geometries illustrate a consistent shift in which screening lengths and conductivity arise from the same underlying structures. A reader would care because this coupling means that practical electrolyte performance cannot be improved by tuning one scale while ignoring the others.

Core claim

In lithium electrolytes, increasing concentration drives a systematic evolution from solvent-dominated Li+ coordination to ion pairing, clustering, and correlated domains. Screening and transport are not independent phenomena but emerge from these same correlated structures. The perspective therefore replaces separate conceptual frameworks with a single physical picture that links local coordination motifs, mesoscopic ionic organization, and macroscopic transport.

What carries the argument

Correlated ionic clusters and domains that couple short-range coordination chemistry with collective electrostatic screening and ionic transport.

Load-bearing premise

The patterns observed in the chosen examples from carbonates, polymers, concentrated solutions, and confinement represent a general, systematic evolution that applies across lithium electrolytes.

What would settle it

An experimental lithium electrolyte in which changes in local coordination do not alter the effective screening length or collective transport behavior would directly challenge the claimed coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10089 by A. Coste, A. van Roekeghem, E. Zunzunegui-Bru, I. Skarmoutsos, S. Mossa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Lithium electrolytes are commonly described using separate conceptual frameworks for local coordination chemistry, electrostatic screening, and ionic transport. This separation is effective in dilute conditions but breaks down at higher concentration, where coordination, ion pairing, clustering, and collective dynamics become intrinsically coupled. In this Perspective, we develop a unified multiscale framework that links local coordination motifs, mesoscopic ionic organization, and macroscopic transport within a single physical picture. Through representative examples spanning carbonate liquids, polymer electrolytes, concentrated systems, and confinement, we show that increasing concentration drives a systematic evolution from solvent-dominated Li$^+$ coordination to ion pairing, clustering, and correlated domains. In this regime, screening and transport are not independent phenomena but arise from the same underlying correlated structures. This perspective implies that rational electrolyte design must simultaneously control short-range coordination, mesoscale organization, and collective electrostatic response.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a Perspective that synthesizes trends in lithium electrolyte literature. It argues that separate frameworks for local Li+ coordination chemistry, electrostatic screening, and ionic transport are effective only in dilute regimes and break down at higher concentrations where coordination, ion pairing, clustering, and collective dynamics become coupled. The authors develop a unified multiscale framework linking short-range motifs, mesoscopic organization, and macroscopic transport, illustrated through examples from carbonate liquids, polymer electrolytes, concentrated systems, and confinement. They conclude that screening and transport emerge from the same correlated structures, implying that rational design must simultaneously address short-range coordination, mesoscale organization, and collective electrostatic response.

Significance. If the interpretive synthesis holds, the work offers a valuable conceptual unification that could help researchers move beyond fragmented descriptions of electrolyte behavior. By emphasizing that correlated structures underlie multiple phenomena across scales, it provides a physical picture that may guide design of high-concentration or confined electrolytes. The perspective draws on existing literature without introducing new quantitative predictions or data, so its significance rests on its ability to stimulate integrated experimental and theoretical studies.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and representative examples] Abstract and the section presenting representative examples: the central claim of a 'systematic evolution' from solvent-dominated coordination to ion pairing, clustering, and correlated domains across carbonate liquids, polymers, concentrated systems, and confinement is load-bearing for the unified framework. However, the argument relies on selected illustrative cases without a quantitative metric (e.g., a defined order parameter or scaling relation) or explicit discussion of counterexamples, which weakens the generality asserted for lithium electrolytes as a class.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction or framework development] The transition between the discussion of dilute vs. concentrated regimes could be clarified by explicitly stating the concentration thresholds at which the coupling becomes dominant, to help readers map the framework onto specific experimental systems.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions (if present) should include brief statements of the key physical insight each panel is meant to convey, rather than only descriptive labels, to strengthen the connection between visuals and the multiscale argument.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential value of the unified framework. We have carefully considered the major comment on the generality of the central claim and have revised the manuscript accordingly to better qualify the illustrative nature of the examples while preserving the Perspective's synthetic intent.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and representative examples] Abstract and the section presenting representative examples: the central claim of a 'systematic evolution' from solvent-dominated coordination to ion pairing, clustering, and correlated domains across carbonate liquids, polymers, concentrated systems, and confinement is load-bearing for the unified framework. However, the argument relies on selected illustrative cases without a quantitative metric (e.g., a defined order parameter or scaling relation) or explicit discussion of counterexamples, which weakens the generality asserted for lithium electrolytes as a class.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation, which correctly identifies a limitation in how the generality is presented. As a Perspective synthesizing trends from the literature, the manuscript intentionally uses representative examples to illustrate the proposed multiscale framework rather than claiming exhaustive coverage or deriving new quantitative relations. The examples are drawn from established behaviors in the cited systems to show the coupling of coordination, screening, and transport. We agree that the lack of an explicit order parameter, scaling relation, or counterexample discussion weakens the asserted generality for the broader class of lithium electrolytes. In the revised version, we will add a dedicated paragraph to the representative examples section that (i) explicitly states the illustrative scope, (ii) references literature on systems where the evolution from solvent-dominated to correlated regimes is less systematic (e.g., certain polymer-in-salt or highly confined cases), and (iii) clarifies that the framework is conceptual rather than a universal predictive law. We will also adjust the abstract to emphasize that the evolution is demonstrated through these examples. However, defining a new quantitative metric or order parameter would require original analysis or data collection beyond the scope of this Perspective. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this perspective synthesis

full rationale

This is a perspective article that synthesizes trends across existing literature on Li+ coordination, ion pairing, and correlated domains in representative electrolyte classes (carbonates, polymers, concentrated systems, confinement). The central claim is an interpretive unification of short-range, mesoscale, and collective properties as an emergent picture, not a derivation or quantitative prediction. No equations, fitted parameters, or new results are presented that could reduce to inputs by construction. The framework draws on external examples without self-referential definitions or load-bearing self-citations that close a loop. The argument remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The perspective rests on standard domain knowledge in electrolyte chemistry and soft matter without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Coordination, ion pairing, clustering, and collective dynamics become intrinsically coupled at higher concentrations
    Invoked to explain why separate frameworks break down beyond dilute conditions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5469 in / 1223 out tokens · 54440 ms · 2026-05-12T03:21:07.146450+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 74 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Xu, Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium- based rechargeable batteries, Chemical reviews104, 4303 (2004)

    K. Xu, Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium- based rechargeable batteries, Chemical reviews104, 4303 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Xu, Electrolytes and interphases in li-ion batteries and beyond, Chemical Reviews114, 11503 (2014)

    K. Xu, Electrolytes and interphases in li-ion batteries and beyond, Chemical Reviews114, 11503 (2014)

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Armand and J.-M

    M. Armand and J.-M. Tarascon, Building better batter- ies, Nature451, 652 (2008)

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    J. B. Goodenough and Y. Kim, Challenges for recharge- able li batteries, Chemistry of Materials22, 587 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    R. Kjellander, Oscillatory and long-range monotonic ex- ponential decays of electrostatic interactions in ionic liq- uids and other electrolytes, The Journal of Chemical Physics148, 193701 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Borodin and G

    O. Borodin and G. D. Smith, Quantum chemistry and molecular dynamics simulation study of dimethyl carbon- ate: Ethylene carbonate electrolytes doped with lipf6, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B113, 1763 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Borodin, M

    O. Borodin, M. Olguin, P. Ganesh, P. R. C. Kent, J. L. Allen, and W. A. Henderson, Competitive lithium sol- vation of linear and cyclic carbonates from quantum chemistry, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics18, 164 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    G. Feng, M. Chen, S. Bi, Z. A. H. Goodwin, E. B. Post- nikov, N. Brilliantov, M. Urbakh, and A. A. Kornyshev, Free and bound states of ions in ionic liquids, conductiv- ity, and underscreening paradox, Physical Review X9, 021024 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    France-Lanord and J

    A. France-Lanord and J. C. Grossman, Correlations from ion pairing and the nernst-einstein equation, Physical Re- view Letters122, 136001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Skarmoutsos and S

    I. Skarmoutsos and S. Mossa, Length scales in elec- trolytes, The Journal of Chemical Physics163, 054502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Soetens, C

    J.-C. Soetens, C. Millot, and B. Maigret, Molecular dynamics simulation of li+bf4- in ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, and dimethyl carbonate solvents, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A102, 1055 (1998)

    work page 1998

  12. [12]

    Li and P

    T. Li and P. B. Balbuena, Theoretical studies of lithium perchlorate in ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, and their mixtures, Journal of The Electrochemical So- ciety146, 3613 (1999)

    work page 1999

  13. [13]

    Masia, M

    M. Masia, M. Probst, and R. Rey, Ethylene carbonate- li+: A theoretical study of structural and vibrational properties in gas and liquid phases, The Journal of Phys- ical Chemistry B108, 2016 (2004)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    M. D. Bhatt, M. Cho, and K. Cho, Interaction of li+ ions with ethylene carbonate (ec): Density functional theory calculations, Applied Surface Science257, 1463 (2010)

    work page 2010

  15. [15]

    M. D. Bhatt, M. Cho, and K. Cho, Density functional theory calculations and ab initio molecular dynamics sim- ulations for diffusion of li+ within liquid ethylene carbon- ate, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering20, 065004 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Skarmoutsos, V

    I. Skarmoutsos, V. Ponnuchamy, V. Vetere, and S. Mossa, Li+ solvation in pure, binary, and ternary mixtures of organic carbonate electrolytes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C119, 4502 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    S. A. Hyodo and K. Okabayashi, Raman intensity study of local structure in nonaqueous electrolyte solutions. i. cation-solvent interaction in liclo4/ethylene carbonate, Electrochimica Acta34, 1551 (1989)

    work page 1989

  18. [18]

    J. F. Ogara, G. Nazri, and D. M. Macarthur, A carbon- 13 and lithium-6 nuclear magnetic resonance study of lithium perchlorate/poly (ethylene oxide) electrolytes, Solid State Ionics47, 87 (1991)

    work page 1991

  19. [19]

    Fukushima, Y

    T. Fukushima, Y. Matsuda, H. Hashimoto, and R. Arakawa, Studies on solvation of lithium ions in organic electrolyte solutions by electrospray ionization- mass spectroscopy, Electrochemical and Solid-State Let- ters4, A127 (2001)

    work page 2001

  20. [20]

    Bogle, R

    X. Bogle, R. Vazquez, S. Greenbaum, A. von Wald Cresce, and K. Xu, Understanding li+-solvent in- teraction in nonaqueous carbonate electrolytes with 17o nmr, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters4, 1664 (2013)

    work page 2013

  21. [21]

    L. Yang, A. Xiao, and B. L. Lucht, Investigation of sol- vation in lithium ion battery electrolytes by nmr spec- troscopy, Journal of Molecular Liquids154, 131 (2010)

    work page 2010

  22. [22]

    K. J. Yuan, H. T. Bian, Y. N. Shen, B. Jiang, J. B. Li, Y. F. Zhang, H. L. Chen, and J. R. Zheng, Coordina- tion number of li+ in nonaqueous electrolyte solutions determined by molecular rotational measurements, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B118, 3689 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Ponnuchamy, S

    V. Ponnuchamy, S. Mossa, and I. Skarmoutsos, Solvent and salt effect on lithium ion solvation and contact ion pair formation in organic carbonates: A quantum chem- ical perspective, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 122, 25930 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Jiang, V

    B. Jiang, V. Ponnuchamy, Y. Shen, X. Yang, K. Yuan, V. Vetere, S. Mossa, I. Skarmoutsos, Y. Zhang, and J. Zheng, The anion effect on li+ ion coordination struc- ture in ethylene carbonate solutions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters7, 3554 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Kameda, Y

    Y. Kameda, Y. Umebayashi, M. Takeuchi, M. A. Wa- hab, S. Fukuda, S. I. Ishiguro, M. Sasaki, Y. Amo, and T. Usuki, Solvation structure of li+ in concentrated lipf6- propylene carbonate solutions, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B111, 6104 (2007). 13

    work page 2007

  26. [26]

    von Wald Cresce, M

    A. von Wald Cresce, M. Gobet, O. Borodin, J. Peng, S. M. Russell, E. Wikner, A. Fu, L. B. Hu, H. S. Lee, Z. C. Zhang, X. Q. Yang, S. Greenbaum, K. Amine, and K. Xu, Anion solvation in carbonate-based electrolytes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C119, 27255 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Chapman, O

    N. Chapman, O. Borodin, T. Yoon, C. C. Nguyen, and B. L. Lucht, Spectroscopic and density functional theory characterization of common lithium salt solvates in car- bonate electrolytes for lithium batteries, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C121, 2135 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Berthier, W

    C. Berthier, W. Gorecki, M. Minier, M. B. Armand, J. M. Chabagno, and P. Rigaud, Microscopic investigation of ionic conductivity in alkali metal salts–poly(ethylene ox- ide) adducts, Solid State Ionics11, 91 (1983)

    work page 1983

  29. [29]

    Borodin and G

    O. Borodin and G. D. Smith, Mechanism of ion transport in amorphous poly(ethylene oxide)/litfsi from molecular dynamics simulations, Macromolecules39, 1620 (2006)

    work page 2006

  30. [30]

    Coste, T

    A. Coste, T. Meyer, C. Villevielle, F. Alloin, S. Mossa, and B. Coasne, Interplay of structure and dynamics in solid polymer electrolytes: a molecular dynamics study of lipf6/polypropylene carbonate, arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.02869 10.48550/arXiv.2601.02869 (2026)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.02869 2026

  31. [31]

    J. M. Dalmas, A. van Roekeghem, N. Mingo, and S. Mossa, Can silica nanoparticles improve lithium trans- port in polymer electrolytes?, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C128, 2737 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    M. S. Khan, A. Van Roekeghem, S. Mossa, F. Ivol, L. Bernard, L. Picard, and N. Mingo, Modelling structure and ionic diffusion in a class of ionic liquid crystal-based solid electrolytes, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 26, 4338 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    C. M. Tenney and R. T. Cygan, Analysis of molecular clusters in simulations of lithium-ion battery electrolytes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C117, 24673 (2013)

    work page 2013

  34. [34]

    McEldrew, Z

    M. McEldrew, Z. A. H. Goodwin, S. Bi, M. Z. Bazant, and A. A. Kornyshev, Theory of ion aggregation and gela- tion in super-concentrated electrolytes, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 234506 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    McEldrew, Z

    M. McEldrew, Z. A. Goodwin, S. Bi, A. A. Kornyshev, and M. Z. Bazant, Ion clusters and networks in water-in- salt electrolytes, Journal of The Electrochemical Society 168, 050514 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    McEldrew, Z

    M. McEldrew, Z. A. H. Goodwin, N. Molinari, B. Kozin- sky, A. A. Kornyshev, and M. Z. Bazant, Salt-in-ionic- liquid electrolytes: Ion network formation and negative effective charges of alkali metal cations, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B125, 13752 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Levin, Electrostatic correlations: From plasma to bi- ology, Reports on Progress in Physics65, 1577 (2002)

    Y. Levin, Electrostatic correlations: From plasma to bi- ology, Reports on Progress in Physics65, 1577 (2002)

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    Hansen and I

    J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald,Theory of Simple Liq- uids with Applications to Soft Matter, 4th ed. (Academic Press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Rotenberg, O

    B. Rotenberg, O. Bernard, and J.-P. Hansen, Under- screening in ionic liquids: a first principles analysis, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter30, 054005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    H. J. Hayler, T. S. Groves, A. Guerrini, A. Southam, W. Zheng, and S. Perkin, The surface force balance: di- rect measurement of interactions in fluids and soft mat- ter, Reports on Progress in Physics87, 046601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  41. [41]

    Perkin, Ionic liquids in confined geometries, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics14, 5052 (2012)

    S. Perkin, Ionic liquids in confined geometries, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics14, 5052 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    A. M. Smith, A. A. Lee, and S. Perkin, The electrostatic screening length in concentrated electrolytes increases with concentration, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters7, 2157 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    A. A. Lee, C. S. Perez-Martinez, A. M. Smith, and S. Perkin, Scaling analysis of the screening length in concentrated electrolytes, Physical Review Letters119, 026002 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Kjellander, The intimate relationship between dielec- tric response and the decay of intermolecular correlations and surface forces in electrolytes, Soft Matter15, 5866 (2019)

    R. Kjellander, The intimate relationship between dielec- tric response and the decay of intermolecular correlations and surface forces in electrolytes, Soft Matter15, 5866 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    S. A. Safran and P. A. Pincus, Scaling perspectives of underscreening in concentrated electrolyte solutions, Soft Matter19, 7907 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    M. A. Gebbie, M. Valtiner, X. Banquy, W. A. Henderson, and J. N. Israelachvili, Reply to perkin et al.: Experimen- tal observations demonstrate that ionic liquids form both bound (stern) and diffuse electric double layers, Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences110, E4122 (2013)

    work page 2013

  47. [47]

    M. A. Gebbie, M. Valtiner, X. Banquy, E. T. Fox, W. A. Henderson, and J. N. Israelachvili, Ionic liquids behave as dilute electrolyte solutions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, 9674 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    M. A. Gebbie, A. M. Smith, H. A. Dobbs, G. G. Warr, X. Banquy, M. Valtiner, M. W. Rutland, J. N. Is- raelachvili, S. Perkin, R. Atkin,et al., Long range electro- static forces in ionic liquids, Chemical communications 53, 1214 (2017)

    work page 2017

  49. [49]

    von Wald Cresce, O

    A. von Wald Cresce, O. Borodin, and K. Xu, Correlating li+ solvation sheath structure with interphasial chemistry on graphite, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C116, 26111 (2012)

    work page 2012

  50. [50]

    H. P. K. Ngo, Y. Shao, T. Bertaux, T. K. L. Nguyen, J. Solier, E. Planes, P. Judeinstein, F. Alloin, J.-Y. Sanchez, and C. Iojoiu, Single-ion conducting polymer electrolyte with excellent interfacial stability toward the lithium metal, ACS Applied Energy Materials8, 2819 (2025)

    work page 2025

  51. [51]

    Kondrat, G

    S. Kondrat, G. Feng, F. Bresme, M. Urbakh, and A. A. Kornyshev, Theory and simulations of ionic liquids in nanoconfinement, Chemical Reviews123, 6668 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Mossa, Re-entrant phase transitions and dynamics of a nanoconfined ionic liquid, Phys

    S. Mossa, Re-entrant phase transitions and dynamics of a nanoconfined ionic liquid, Phys. Rev. X8, 031062 (2018)

    work page 2018

  53. [53]

    Kondrat, N

    S. Kondrat, N. Georgi, M. V. Fedorov, and A. A. Ko- rnyshev, A superionic state in nano-porous double-layer capacitors: insights from monte carlo simulations, Phys- ical Chemistry Chemical Physics13, 11359 (2011)

    work page 2011

  54. [54]

    Kondrat and A

    S. Kondrat and A. Kornyshev, Superionic state in double- layer capacitors with nanoporous electrodes, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter23, 022201 (2011)

    work page 2011

  55. [55]

    Futamura, T

    R. Futamura, T. Iiyama, Y. Takasaki, Y. Gogotsi, M. J. Biggs, M. Salanne, J. S´ egalini, P. Simon, and K. Kaneko, Partial breaking of the coulombic ordering of ionic liquids confined in carbon nanopores, Nature materials16, 1225 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    D. M. Pesko, K. Timachova, M. C. Smith, I. Villaluenga, J. Newman, and N. P. Balsara, Negative transference numbers in poly(ethylene oxide)-based electrolytes, Jour- nal of The Electrochemical Society164, E3569 (2017)

    work page 2017

  57. [57]

    Ganesh, D

    P. Ganesh, D. E. Jiang, and P. R. C. Kent, Accurate static and dynamic properties of liquid electrolytes for li-ion batteries from ab initio molecular dynamics, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B115, 3085 (2011)

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    Behler and M

    J. Behler and M. Parrinello, Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy sur- 14 faces, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 146401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  59. [59]

    No´ e, A

    F. No´ e, A. Tkatchenko, K.-R. M¨ uller, and C. Clementi, Machine learning for molecular simulation, Annual re- view of physical chemistry71, 361 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    J. Wang, S. Olsson, C. Wehmeyer, A. Perez, N. E. Charron, G. D. Fabritiis, F. No´ e, and C. Clementi, Ma- chine learning of coarse-grained molecular dynamics force fields, ACS Central Science5, 755 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    B. E. Husic, N. E. Charron, D. Lemm, J. Wang, A. Perez, M. Majewski, A. Kr¨ amer, Y. Chen, S. Olsson, G. D. Fab- ritiis, F. No´ e, and C. Clementi, Coarse graining molec- ular dynamics with graph neural networks, The Journal of Chemical Physics153, 194101 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Bapst, E

    V. Bapst, E. D. Cubuk, and B. G. D. et al., Unveiling the predictive power of static structure in glassy systems, Nature Physics16, 448 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    T. Xie, J. C. Grossman, W. A. G. III,et al., Graph neu- ral networks for predicting liquid electrolyte properties, Chemistry of Materials33, 5404 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [64]

    Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 145, 170901 (2016)

    J. Behler, Perspective: Machine learning potentials for atomistic simulations, The Journal of Chemical Physics 145, 170901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  65. [65]

    A. P. Bart´ ok and G. Cs´ anyi, Gaussian approximation potentials: A brief tutorial introduction, International Journal of Quantum Chemistry115, 1051 (2015)

    work page 2015

  66. [66]

    G. A. Voth, ed.,Coarse-Graining of Condensed Phase and Biomolecular Systems(CRC Press, 2008)

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    P. A. Madden and M. Salanne, Polarization effects in ionic solids and melts, Accounts of Chemical Research 47, 76 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [68]

    W. G. Noid, Perspective: Coarse-grained models for biomolecular systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics 139, 090901 (2013)

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    Tiwary and M

    P. Tiwary and M. Parrinello, A time-independent free en- ergy estimator for metadynamics, The Journal of Physi- cal Chemistry B119, 736 (2015)

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    K. T. Butler, D. W. Davies, H. Cartwright, O. Isayev, and A. Walsh, Machine learning for molecular and ma- terials science, Nature559, 547 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    M. D. Bhatt and C. O’Dwyer, Recent progress in theo- retical and computational investigations of li-ion battery materials and electrolytes, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics17, 4799 (2015)

    work page 2015

  72. [72]

    Ponrouch, D

    A. Ponrouch, D. Monti, A. Boschin, B. Steen, P. Jo- hansson, and M. R. Palac´ ın, Non-aqueous electrolytes for sodium-ion batteries, Journal of Materials Chemistry A 3, 22 (2015)

    work page 2015

  73. [73]

    Delmas, Sodium and sodium-ion batteries: 50 years of research, Advanced Energy Materials8, 1703137 (2018)

    C. Delmas, Sodium and sodium-ion batteries: 50 years of research, Advanced Energy Materials8, 1703137 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [74]

    Canepa, G

    P. Canepa, G. S. Gautam, D. C. Hannah, R. Malik, M. Liu, K. G. Gallagher, K. A. Persson, and G. Ceder, Odyssey of multivalent cathode materials: Open ques- tions and future challenges, Chemical Reviews117, 4287 (2017)

    work page 2017