arxiv: 2605.10243 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ✦ hep-ex

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Electroweak physics and long-lived particles at LHCb

Felicia Volle (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex

keywords LHCbelectroweakW bosontop quarkcross sectioncharge asymmetryparton distribution functionsaxion-like particles

0 comments

The pith

LHCb presents first forward W boson and top quark cross-section measurements

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes new measurements of W boson and top quark production cross-sections plus charge asymmetries in the forward region of pp collisions at the LHC. These are the first such results from the LHCb experiment using 5.1 and 5.4 fb^{-1} of data. A sympathetic reader cares because the forward acceptance supplies information on parton distributions at extreme x values that central detectors cannot access. The work also reports searches for axion-like particles and heavy neutral leptons as motivated BSM extensions.

Core claim

The LHCb experiment has measured the W and t production cross-sections, as well as charge asymmetries, for the first time with 5.1 and 5.4 fb^{-1} of 13 TeV pp collisions. Because of the detector's forward pseudorapidity coverage these results supply complementary constraints on parton distribution functions relative to measurements performed at central rapidities.

What carries the argument

LHCb's forward pseudorapidity coverage that accesses low-x and high-x parton distributions inaccessible to central detectors.

If this is right

The measurements can be directly incorporated into global PDF fits to reduce uncertainties at extreme x.
Charge asymmetry data further separate u- and d-quark distributions in the forward region.
Consistency with Standard Model predictions strengthens the baseline for future BSM searches at LHCb.
The same dataset and selection techniques enable the reported axion-like particle and heavy neutral lepton searches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future LHCb runs with higher luminosity will tighten these forward constraints and may reveal tensions with central measurements.
Similar forward measurements at other experiments could be combined to produce a more complete picture of proton structure.
If discrepancies appear once these data enter PDF fits, they would motivate targeted BSM studies in the electroweak sector.

Load-bearing premise

Detector efficiencies, background shapes, and forward-region PDF modeling are known well enough that the extracted cross-sections and asymmetries contain no significant bias.

What would settle it

A statistically significant deviation between the reported cross-sections or asymmetries and updated global PDF predictions after the measurements are included in the fit.

read the original abstract

Extensions of the Standard Model (SM) of Particle Physics can be probed either through precision measurements of SM observables or via direct searches for processes beyond the SM (BSM). This proceeding focuses on precision measurements in the electroweak sector, in particular the properties of the $Z$ boson, $W$ boson and top quark. Measurements of the $W$ and $t$ production cross-sections, as well as charge asymmetries, with an integrated luminosity of 5.1 and 5.4 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions collected by the LHCb experiment, are presented for the first time. In consequence of the forward coverage of the LHCb detector, these results provide complementary probes on parton distribution functions compared to measurements performed at central rapidity. Well-motivated BSM candidates include mediators between the visible and dark sectors. In this context, recent results from searches for axion-like particles and heavy neutral leptons are also discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

LHCb reports first forward W and top cross-sections plus asymmetries that give useful PDF constraints, but this is a short proceeding with limited technical detail.

read the letter

LHCb has now measured W boson and top quark production cross-sections and charge asymmetries for the first time in the forward acceptance, using 5.1–5.4 fb^{-1} of data. These numbers sit in a kinematic region that ATLAS and CMS do not cover, so they supply orthogonal information on parton distributions that feeds into many other LHC predictions. The BSM section briefly covers searches for axion-like particles and heavy neutral leptons as examples of long-lived mediators, but it functions more as an overview than a standalone result. The forward coverage is the clear strength here; it is a natural use of the detector and the collaboration has the right tools for these electroweak observables. The main soft spot is the format. As a conference proceeding the text states the results are new but does not include the full tables of systematic uncertainties, efficiency plots, or background validation that would appear in a journal version. Any unaccounted bias in forward-region efficiency or PDF modeling would move the extracted values, and those checks cannot be inspected from the summary alone. Nothing in the description points to a mishandled step, but the short length leaves the usual questions about how tightly the analysis was controlled. This paper is for PDF fitters, forward-physics groups, and anyone who needs updated electroweak inputs for LHC phenomenology. A reader who wants the actual numbers for their own work will find them here, but will still want the complete analysis write-up for the error budgets. It deserves a serious referee if the collaboration submits a full journal version, because the data are new and the forward measurements address a real gap.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This conference proceeding reports LHCb results on electroweak physics and long-lived particle searches. It presents, for the first time, measurements of W boson and top quark production cross-sections together with charge asymmetries, using 5.1 fb^{-1} and 5.4 fb^{-1} of pp collision data in the forward acceptance. These are positioned as complementary probes of parton distribution functions. The proceeding also summarizes recent LHCb searches for axion-like particles and heavy neutral leptons as potential mediators to dark sectors.

Significance. If the reported cross-sections and asymmetries hold, they supply valuable new constraints on PDFs at low-x and high-x in the forward region, where central-rapidity data from ATLAS and CMS provide limited coverage. This directly improves theoretical predictions for LHC processes. The long-lived particle searches add timely input to dark-sector model space. The work correctly exploits LHCb's forward geometry and is a useful summary of ongoing LHCb electroweak and exotic programs.

minor comments (3)

The abstract states that the W and top measurements use 'an integrated luminosity of 5.1 and 5.4 fb^{-1}' but does not indicate which dataset applies to which observable; this ambiguity should be removed.
No numerical values, tables, or figures for the cross-sections, asymmetries, or their uncertainties appear in the provided text, which weakens the ability to assess the 'first time' claim even in a proceeding format.
The transition from electroweak measurements to the BSM long-lived particle searches is abrupt; a short bridging sentence would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary and significance assessment of our work on electroweak physics and long-lived particle searches at LHCb. The recommendation for minor revision is appreciated, and we have updated the manuscript to improve clarity and presentation where possible.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental data reporting

full rationale

The paper reports first-time measurements of W and top production cross-sections plus charge asymmetries from LHCb pp collision data (5.1–5.4 fb^{-1}). These quantities are extracted directly from observed events after standard corrections for efficiency, background, and PDF unfolding in the forward region. No equations, ansatzes, or derivations are presented that loop back to parameters fitted within the same work; the central claims are empirical results whose validity depends on external detector calibration and simulation, not on internal self-reference. No self-citation load-bearing steps, fitted-input predictions, or uniqueness theorems appear in the provided text. This is the expected non-circular outcome for an experimental measurement proceeding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental measurement summary; no theoretical free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced. The work rests on standard LHCb detector calibration, SM electroweak predictions, and conventional background modeling assumptions that are not detailed in the provided abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1166 out tokens · 41640 ms · 2026-05-12T04:49:49.931473+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
Measurements of the W and t production cross-sections, as well as charge asymmetries, with an integrated luminosity of 5.1 and 5.4 fb^{-1} of pp collisions collected by the LHCb experiment, are presented for the first time.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
A search for ALP→γγ decays has been performed... No candidates have been found and the extracted upper limits...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[1]

LHCb Detector Performance.Int

Roel Aaij et al. LHCb Detector Performance.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 30(07):1530022, 2015

work page 2015
[2]

R. S. Thorne, A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, and G. Watt. Parton Distributions and QCD at LHCb. In16th International Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering and Related Subjects, page 30, 8 2008

work page 2008
[3]

Measurement of theZ-Boson Mass.Phys

Roel Aaij et al. Measurement of theZ-Boson Mass.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135(16):161802, 2025

work page 2025
[4]

A simple method to determine charge- dependent curvature biases in track reconstruction in hadron collider experiments.Eur

William Barter, Martina Pili, and Mika Vesterinen. A simple method to determine charge- dependent curvature biases in track reconstruction in hadron collider experiments.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81(3):251, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

Aaij et al

R. Aaij et al. Curvature-bias corrections using a pseudomass method.JINST, 19(03):P03010, 2024

work page 2024
[6]

Aaltonen et al

T. Aaltonen et al. High-precision measurement of theWboson mass with the CDF II detector.Science, 376(6589):170–176, 2022

work page 2022
[7]

Schael et al

S. Schael et al. Electroweak Measurements in Electron-Positron Collisions atW-Boson- Pair Energies at LEP.Phys. Rept., 532:119–244, 2013

work page 2013
[8]

Compatibility and combination of worldW-boson mass measure- ments.Eur

Simone Amoroso et al. Compatibility and combination of worldW-boson mass measure- ments.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(5):451, 2024

work page 2024
[9]

Measurement of theW→µνcross-sections as a function of the muon transverse momentum inppcollisions at 5.02 TeV.JHEP, 03:148, 2026

Roel Aaij et al. Measurement of theW→µνcross-sections as a function of the muon transverse momentum inppcollisions at 5.02 TeV.JHEP, 03:148, 2026

work page 2026
[10]

Measurement of theWboson mass.JHEP, 01:036, 2022

Roel Aaij et al. Measurement of theWboson mass.JHEP, 01:036, 2022

work page 2022
[11]

Measurement of theW-boson production cross-sections inppcollisions at√s= 13 TeV in the forward region.submitted to journal, 4 2026

Roel Aaij et al. Measurement of theW-boson production cross-sections inppcollisions at√s= 13 TeV in the forward region.submitted to journal, 4 2026

work page 2026
[12]

Precision measurement of the muon charge asymmetry fromW-boson decays inppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV in the forward region.submitted to journal, 4 2026

Roel Aaij et al. Precision measurement of the muon charge asymmetry fromW-boson decays inppcollisions at √s= 13 TeV in the forward region.submitted to journal, 4 2026

work page 2026
[13]

Measurement of the top-quark production cross-section and charge asym- metry at LHCb.submitted to journal, 12 2025

Roel Aaij et al. Measurement of the top-quark production cross-section and charge asym- metry at LHCb.submitted to journal, 12 2025

work page 2025
[14]

Salam, and Gregory Soyez

Matteo Cacciari, Gavin P. Salam, and Gregory Soyez. The anti-k t jet clustering algorithm. JHEP, 04:063, 2008

work page 2008
[15]

Machine learning techniques for jet reconstruction at LHCb and appli- cation to the search forH→b ¯bandH→c¯cin √s= 13 TeVppcollisions.submitted to journal, 1 2026

Roel Aaij et al. Machine learning techniques for jet reconstruction at LHCb and appli- cation to the search forH→b ¯bandH→c¯cin √s= 13 TeVppcollisions.submitted to journal, 1 2026

work page 2026
[16]

Schapire

Yoav Freund and Robert E. Schapire. A Decision-Theoretic Generalization of On-Line Learning and an Application to Boosting.J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 55(1):119–139, 1997

work page 1997
[17]

Leo Breiman, Jerome Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and Charles J. Stone.Classification and Regression Trees (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1984

work page 1984
[18]

Identification of beauty and charm quark jets at LHCb.JINST, 10(06):P06013, 2015

Roel Aaij et al. Identification of beauty and charm quark jets at LHCb.JINST, 10(06):P06013, 2015

work page 2015
[19]

Leptonic top-quark asymmetry predictions at LHCb.Phys

Rhorry Gauld. Leptonic top-quark asymmetry predictions at LHCb.Phys. Rev. D, 91:054029, 2015

work page 2015
[20]

Search for resonances decaying to photon pairs with masses between 4.9 and 19.4 GeV.submitted to journal, 7 2025

Roel Aaij et al. Search for resonances decaying to photon pairs with masses between 4.9 and 19.4 GeV.submitted to journal, 7 2025

work page 2025
[21]

Search for heavy neutral leptons inB-meson decays.JHEP, 03:178, 2026

Roel Aaij et al. Search for heavy neutral leptons inB-meson decays.JHEP, 03:178, 2026

work page 2026
[22]

Augusto Alves, Jr

A. Augusto Alves, Jr. et al. The LHCb Detector at the LHC.JINST, 3:S08005, 2008

work page 2008
[23]

Search for Majorana neutrinos inB − →π +µ−µ− decays.Phys

Roel Aaij et al. Search for Majorana neutrinos inB − →π +µ−µ− decays.Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(13):131802, 2014

work page 2014
[24]

Performance of LHCb as a feebly interacting particles detector.LHCb Public figure, 2025

Roel Aaij et al. Performance of LHCb as a feebly interacting particles detector.LHCb Public figure, 2025

work page 2025