pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10483 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Laser-induced demagnetization in a MAX phase (Cr0.5Mn0.5)2GaC

Iaroslav Mogunov (1) , Artyom Gorshkov (1) , Mikhail Rautskii (2) , Tatyana Andryushchenko (2) , Alexandra Kalashnikova (1) ((1) Ioffe Institute , (2) Kirensky Institute of Physics)
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 05:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords laser-induced demagnetizationMAX phasetwo-dimensional magnetismultrafast spin dynamicsmagneto-optical Kerr effectthree-temperature modelspin heat capacitytype-II demagnetization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Laser pulses trigger two-step type-II demagnetization in the MAX phase (Cr0.5Mn0.5)2GaC, a signature of its two-dimensional magnetic order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies ultrafast magnetization dynamics in a 40-nm epitaxial film of the magnetic MAX phase (Cr0.5Mn0.5)2GaC, which orders magnetically below about 250 K. Time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect measurements show that laser excitation produces a two-step demagnetization transient: a fast initial stage that grows with fluence and temperature, followed by a dominant slower stage lasting roughly 100 ps. Application of the three-temperature model yields electron-lattice, spin-lattice, and electron-spin coupling constants together with a spin heat capacity that depends only weakly on temperature. This weak dependence explains the observed lack of strong slowing in the dynamics at higher temperatures and excitation levels. The findings establish a foundation for optical manipulation of magnetism in MAX phases and their integration into two-dimensional spintronic devices.

Core claim

Ultrafast demagnetization in (Cr0.5Mn0.5)2GaC proceeds via a two-step type-II process characteristic of two-dimensional magnets, with the fast stage remaining small at low temperature and fluence but growing at higher excitation, while the second stage dominates with a time constant near 100 ps; the three-temperature model applied to the transients extracts coupling constants whose reconstructed spin heat capacity shows only weak temperature dependence, thereby accounting for the absence of pronounced slowing of demagnetization at elevated temperatures and fluences.

What carries the argument

Three-temperature model fitted to time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect transients, used to separate electron, lattice, and spin subsystems and extract their mutual coupling constants along with the spin heat capacity.

If this is right

  • Optical pulses can switch the magnetization of this MAX phase on picosecond timescales with little sensitivity to operating temperature.
  • The nanolaminated structure supports two-dimensional magnetic behavior that persists in a 40-nm film.
  • Electron-spin and spin-lattice coupling values extracted here can serve as design parameters for other magnetic MAX phases.
  • Absence of strong fluence-induced slowing allows consistent demagnetization performance across a range of excitation strengths.
  • MAX phases become experimentally accessible platforms for light-controlled spintronics that combine ceramic stability with metallic conductivity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The layered atomic arrangement in MAX phases likely enforces the two-dimensional character even when the film thickness exceeds a few unit cells.
  • Similar two-step dynamics may appear in other Cr- or Mn-based MAX phases once their magnetic ordering temperatures are reached.
  • The weak temperature dependence of the spin heat capacity could be tested by varying the Cr/Mn ratio to tune the magnetic moment density.
  • Integration with existing thin-film processing routes for MAX phases could lead to hybrid devices that exploit both mechanical robustness and optical magnetic control.

Load-bearing premise

The two-step transients are taken as a direct indicator of two-dimensional magnetism and the three-temperature model is assumed to capture all relevant relaxation channels without material-specific corrections.

What would settle it

Recording single-step demagnetization transients or a strong temperature-dependent slowdown of the 100-ps stage in the same film under comparable laser conditions would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10483 by (2) Kirensky Institute of Physics), Alexandra Kalashnikova (1) ((1) Ioffe Institute, Artyom Gorshkov (1), Iaroslav Mogunov (1), Mikhail Rautskii (2), Tatyana Andryushchenko (2).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Schematic of the pump-probe time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect (tr-MOKE) setup, illustrating the experimental geometry. BPD – balanced photodetector, 𝜆/2 – half-wave plate, WP – Wollastone prism. The inset shows the crystal structure of (Cr1–xMnx)2GaC; (b) Temperature dependence of the ferromagnetic resonance (FMR) integral (black, right) and the corresponding resonant field (red, left); (c) Rem… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Magnetic-field-odd (𝐻-odd) contribution to the measured signals for a laser fluence 𝐹=1 mJ/cm2 and a range of temperatures (dots). The data are vertically offset for clarity. Dashed lines represent fits using a three-exponential function, and solid lines show the results of the three-temperature model (3TM); (b) Temperature dependence of the normalized demagnetization amplitude 𝐴∕𝑀0 and (c) time 𝜏𝑠 , b… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Magnetic-field-odd (𝐻-odd) contribution to the measured signals for an initial temperature 𝑇0=70 K and a range of laser fluences (dots). Dashed lines represent fits using a three-exponential function; (b) Fluence dependence of the normalized demagnetization amplitude 𝐴∕𝑀0 and (c) time 𝜏𝑠 , shown for 𝑇0=70 K (black) and 𝑇0=180 K (red). we used a temperature dependence of the remanent mag￾netization 𝑀0 r… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Temperature dependence of the calculated heat capacities: spin 𝐶𝑠 (green), phonon 𝐶𝑙 (blue), and electron 𝐶𝑒 (red), together with their sum 𝐶 (black), as obtained from the three-temperature model (3TM). (b) A magnified view of 𝐶𝑠 (𝑇 ), the dots represent the values extracted from the 3TM, and the line is a Gaussian fit; (c) Calculated temperature evolution of electrons 𝑇𝑒 (red), lattice 𝑇𝑙 (blue), and … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic MAX phases are nanolaminated metals that combine ceramic-like thermal and mechanical stability with peculiar magnetic ordering, making them attractive for thin-film optoelectronics and spintronics. However, their magnetization dynamics remain largely unexplored. Here, we investigate laser-induced ultrafast demagnetization in a 40-nm-thick epitaxial film of the magnetic MAX phase (Cr0.5Mn0.5)2GaC, which magnetically orders below ~250 K, using time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect spectroscopy. We reveal, that the demagnetization transients exhibit a two-step type-II demagnetization - a signature of two-dimensional magnetic systems. The fast demagnetization stage is small at low temperatures and fluences but becomes prominent with increasing excitation. The second stage dominates the process and has a characteristic time of approximately 100 ps. Applying the three-temperature model, we extract the electron-lattice, spin-lattice, and electron-spin coupling constants. The reconstructed spin heat capacity exhibits a weak temperature dependence, accounting for the absence of significant slowing down of demagnetization at elevated temperatures and fluences. Our results provide a starting point for experimental optical control of magnetism in MAX phases, bringing this broad class of materials into modern 2D spintronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports time-resolved magneto-optical Kerr effect measurements on a 40-nm epitaxial film of the magnetic MAX phase (Cr0.5Mn0.5)2GaC, which orders below ~250 K. It claims that the laser-induced demagnetization transients exhibit a two-step type-II process, interpreted as a signature of two-dimensional magnetism, with the fast component small at low T/fluence and the slow (~100 ps) stage dominant. Application of the three-temperature model yields electron-lattice, spin-lattice, and electron-spin coupling constants; the reconstructed spin heat capacity shows weak temperature dependence, which is said to explain the lack of significant slowing of demagnetization at elevated temperatures and fluences.

Significance. If the central interpretation holds, the work provides the first experimental window into ultrafast magnetization dynamics in MAX phases, a class combining metallic conductivity with ceramic stability. The reported two-step transients and the derived weak C_s(T) dependence would distinguish this system from conventional 3D magnets and support optical control strategies for 2D spintronics. The experimental transients themselves are independent of the model, which is a positive feature.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (demagnetization transients): the assertion that the observed two-step form is 'a signature of two-dimensional magnetic systems' is load-bearing for the headline claim but rests on an untested uniqueness assumption. The 40 nm thickness corresponds to dozens of M2X layers; no controls, thickness series, or comparisons to 3D-ordered analogs are presented to exclude inhomogeneous heating, multi-domain relaxation, or magnon-phonon channels that could produce similar fast-then-slow profiles in a layered but still 3D-ordered material below 250 K.
  2. [§4] §4 (three-temperature model fits): the reconstruction of C_s(T) and the conclusion of its weak temperature dependence are central to explaining the absence of fluence/temperature slowing, yet no raw transients, error bars, specific fluence values, or fit-quality metrics (e.g., reduced χ² or parameter covariance) are shown. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the extracted G_es, G_sl, and C_s are uniquely constrained or affected by fitting degeneracy between C_s and the spin-lattice coupling.
  3. [§4] §4, Eq. (model equations): the three-temperature model is applied without material-specific corrections for the nanolaminated structure or possible additional relaxation channels. The paper does not demonstrate that the fitted parameters remain stable under reasonable variations in the assumed functional forms for C_e(T) or C_l(T), which directly impacts the claimed weak C_s(T) dependence.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and §3] Figure captions and text should explicitly state the laser fluences used for each transient and the temperature range over which the two-step behavior is observed.
  2. [§4] Notation for the coupling constants (G_es, G_sl, G_el) should be defined once in the main text rather than only in the model section, and consistent symbols should be used throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and rigor without altering the core experimental findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (demagnetization transients): the assertion that the observed two-step form is 'a signature of two-dimensional magnetic systems' is load-bearing for the headline claim but rests on an untested uniqueness assumption. The 40 nm thickness corresponds to dozens of M2X layers; no controls, thickness series, or comparisons to 3D-ordered analogs are presented to exclude inhomogeneous heating, multi-domain relaxation, or magnon-phonon channels that could produce similar fast-then-slow profiles in a layered but still 3D-ordered material below 250 K.

    Authors: We agree that the 40 nm film thickness corresponds to multiple M2X layers and that no thickness series or direct 3D-analog comparisons are included, so uniqueness to strictly 2D magnetism cannot be rigorously proven from the present data alone. The interpretation draws from the established association of two-step type-II transients with reduced-dimensional magnetism in the literature, but we will revise the abstract and §3 to describe the behavior as 'consistent with' or 'reminiscent of' two-dimensional systems rather than a definitive signature. We will also add a dedicated paragraph discussing possible alternative mechanisms, including inhomogeneous heating, multi-domain relaxation, and magnon-phonon channels, while noting that the epitaxial quality and sharp magnetic ordering below 250 K make such effects less likely to dominate. This addresses the concern without requiring new experiments. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (three-temperature model fits): the reconstruction of C_s(T) and the conclusion of its weak temperature dependence are central to explaining the absence of fluence/temperature slowing, yet no raw transients, error bars, specific fluence values, or fit-quality metrics (e.g., reduced χ² or parameter covariance) are shown. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the extracted G_es, G_sl, and C_s are uniquely constrained or affected by fitting degeneracy between C_s and the spin-lattice coupling.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional details on the fitting procedure are needed for full assessment. In the revised manuscript we will move the raw demagnetization transients to the supplementary information, explicitly list the fluences employed, include error bars on the extracted parameters, and report fit-quality metrics including reduced χ² values and covariance matrices. We will also add a short discussion of parameter degeneracy, explaining how the weak C_s(T) dependence remains robust when G_sl is varied within physically reasonable bounds. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4] §4, Eq. (model equations): the three-temperature model is applied without material-specific corrections for the nanolaminated structure or possible additional relaxation channels. The paper does not demonstrate that the fitted parameters remain stable under reasonable variations in the assumed functional forms for C_e(T) or C_l(T), which directly impacts the claimed weak C_s(T) dependence.

    Authors: The three-temperature model is applied in its standard phenomenological form, which has been successfully used for other metallic layered magnets. To address the referee's point, the revised §4 will include a sensitivity analysis demonstrating that the extracted weak temperature dependence of C_s(T) persists when the functional forms of C_e(T) and C_l(T) are varied within literature ranges for similar metals. We will also add a brief discussion of why nanolamination-specific corrections or extra channels are not required to describe the data, based on the quality of the fits and the absence of additional features in the transients. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A full thickness series or direct experimental comparisons to 3D-ordered MAX-phase analogs would require fabrication and measurement of additional samples, which cannot be completed within the revision timeline.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The demagnetization transients are measured independently via TR-MOKE spectroscopy on the epitaxial film. The two-step type-II behavior is observed in data and interpreted as a 2D signature; the 3TM is then applied to fit coupling constants (G_es, G_sl, etc.) and reconstruct Cs(T) as a model output. No equations reduce the claimed 2D attribution or weak Cs(T) dependence to prior fitted quantities by construction, and no load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes are invoked that would make results equivalent to inputs. The derivation is self-contained against the experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claims rest on applicability of the three-temperature model to this system and on the interpretation of two-step dynamics as diagnostic of 2D magnetism; both are domain assumptions rather than derived results.

free parameters (1)
  • electron-lattice, spin-lattice, and electron-spin coupling constants
    Extracted by fitting the three-temperature model to the measured demagnetization transients.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Three-temperature model accurately describes the coupled electron, lattice, and spin subsystems in this MAX phase
    Invoked to extract coupling constants and reconstruct spin heat capacity from the data.
  • domain assumption Two-step type-II demagnetization transients are a signature of two-dimensional magnetic systems
    Used to interpret the fast and slow stages as evidence of 2D character.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5581 in / 1447 out tokens · 49810 ms · 2026-05-12T05:18:35.404282+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. K. Geim, Graphene: Status and prospects, Science 324 (5934) (2009) 1530–1534.doi:10.1126/science.1158877. URLhttps://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.1158877

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1158877 2009

  2. [2]

    W. Ren, P. Bøggild, J. Redwing, K. S. Novoselov, L. Sun, Y. Qi, K. Jia, Z. Liu, O. Burton, J. Alexander-Webber, S. Hofmann, Y. Cao, Y.Long,Q.-H.Yang,D.Li,S.H.Choi,K.K.Kim,Y.H.Lee,M.Li, Q. Huang, Y. Gogotsi, N. Clark, A. Carl, R. Gorbachev, T. Olsen, J. Rosen, K. S. Thygesen, D. K. Efetov, B. S. Jessen, M. Yankowitz, J.Barrier,R.K.Kumar,F.H.Koppens,H.Deng,...

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ae2b82 2026

  3. [3]

    T. Tan, X. Jiang, C. Wang, B. Yao, H. Zhang, 2d material optoelectronics for information functional device applications: Status and challenges, Advanced Science 7 (11) (2020) 2000058. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202000058. URLhttps://advanced.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ advs.202000058

    work page doi:10.1002/advs.202000058 2020

  4. [4]

    E. C. Ahn, 2d materials for spintronic devices, npj 2D Materials and Applications 4 (1) (2020).doi:10.1038/s41699-020-0152-0. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41699-020-0152-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41699-020-0152-0 2020

  5. [5]

    J. F. Sierra, J. Fabian, R. K. Kawakami, S. Roche, S. O. Valen- zuela, Van der waals heterostructures for spintronics and opto- spintronics, Nature Nanotechnology 16 (8) (2021) 856–868.doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00936-x. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00936-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41565-021-00936-x 2021

  6. [6]

    Zhang, R

    J. Zhang, R. Jia, K. B. Tan, J. Li, S. Xu, G. Ying, W. Han, M. Lu, A review of max series materials: from diversity, synthesis, prediction, properties oriented to functions, Nano-Micro Letters 17 (1) (2025) 173

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Dahlqvist, M

    M. Dahlqvist, M. W. Barsoum, J. Rosen, MAX phases– past, present, and future, Materials Today 72 (2024) 1–24. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2023.11.010. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S1369702123003577?via%3Dihub

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2023.11.010 2024

  8. [8]

    Anasori, Y

    B. Anasori, Y. Gogotsi, MXenes: trends, growth, and future directions, Graphene and 2D Materials 7 (3) (2022) 75–79. doi:10.1007/s41127-022-00053-z. URLhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/ s41127-022-00053-z

    work page doi:10.1007/s41127-022-00053-z 2022

  9. [9]

    J.-U.Lee,S.Lee,J.H.Ryoo,S.Kang,T.Y.Kim,P.Kim,C.-H.Park, J.-G. Park, H. Cheong, Ising-type magnetic ordering in atomically thin feps3, Nano letters 16 (12) (2016) 7433–7438

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K.L.Seyler,D.Zhong,E.Schmidgall,M.A.McGuire,D.H.Cobden, et al., Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature 546 (7657) (2017) 270–273

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    A. S. Ingason, M. Dahlqvist, J. Rosen, Magnetic MAX phases from theory and experiments; a review, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 28 (43) (2016) 433003.doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/43/433003. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/43/433003

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/43/433003 2016

  12. [12]

    J. Dey, E. Jedryka, R. Kalvig, U. Wiedwald, M. Farle, J. Rosen, M. Wójcik, Helical magnetic structure of epitaxial films of nanolam- inatedmn 2GaCmax phase, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 054413.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054413. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054413

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.108.054413 2023

  13. [13]

    Q. Tao, J. Lu, M. Dahlqvist, A. Mockute, S. Calder, A. Petruhins, R. Meshkian, O. Rivin, D. Potashnikov, E. N. Caspi, H. Shaked, A. Hoser, C. Opagiste, R.-M. Galera, R. Salikhov, U. Wiedwald, C. Ritter, A. R. Wildes, B. Johansson, L. Hultman, M. Farle, M. W. Barsoum, J. Rosen, Atomically layered and ordered rare-earth i-max phases: A new class of magnetic...

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater 2019

  14. [14]

    C. M. Hamm, J. D. Bocarsly, G. Seward, U. I. Kramm, C. S. Birkel, Non-conventional synthesis and magnetic properties of max phases (cr/mn)2alc and (cr/fe)2alc, J. Mater. Chem. C 5 (2017) 5700–5708. doi:10.1039/C7TC00112F. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C7TC00112F

    work page doi:10.1039/c7tc00112f 2017

  15. [15]

    Dahlqvist, A

    M. Dahlqvist, A. S. Ingason, B. Alling, F. Magnus, A. Thore, A. Petruhins, A. Mockute, U. B. Arnalds, M. Sahlberg, B. Hjör- varsson, I. A. Abrikosov, J. Rosen, Magnetically driven anisotropic structural changes in the atomic laminateMn2GaC, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016) 014410.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.93.014410. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.014410

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.014410 2016

  16. [16]

    Z. Liu, T. Waki, Y. Tabata, K. Yuge, H. Nakamura, I. Watanabe, Magnetic ground state of the𝑀𝑛+1𝑎𝑋𝑛-phase nitride cr2gan, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013) 134401.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.88.134401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.134401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.134401 2013

  17. [17]

    E. B. Thorsteinsson, A. S. Ingason, F. Magnus, Magnetic order- ing and magnetocrystalline anisotropy in epitaxialmn 2GaCmax phase thin films, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7 (2023) 034409.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevMaterials.7.034409. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.034409

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.7.034409 2023

  18. [18]

    Kubitza, B

    N. Kubitza, B. Beckmann, S. Jankovic, K. Skokov, A. A. Riaz, C. Schlueter, A. Regoutz, O. Gutfleisch, C. S. Birkel, Exploring the potential of nitride and carbonitride max phases: synthesis, magnetic and electrical transport properties of v2gec, v2gec0. 5n0. 5, and v2gen, Chemistry of Materials 36 (3) (2024) 1375–1384

    work page 2024

  19. [19]

    Schröder, A

    F.Siegrist,J.A.Gessner,M.Ossiander,C.Denker,Y.-P.Chang,M.C. Schröder, A. Guggenmos, Y. Cui, J. Walowski, U. Martens, et al., Light-wavedynamiccontrolofmagnetism,Nature571(7764)(2019) 240–244. Mogunov Ia. A. et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 6 of 8 Laser-inducd demagnetization in a MAX phase

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    F. Wang, D. E. Bürgler, R. Adam, U. Parlak, D. Cao, C. Greb, S. Heidtfeld, C. M. Schneider, Magnetization relaxation dynamics in [Co∕Pt]3 multilayersonpico-andnanosecondtimescales,Phys.Rev. Res. 3 (2021) 033061.doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033061. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.033061

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033061 2021

  21. [21]

    Medapalli, D

    R. Medapalli, D. Afanasiev, D. K. Kim, Y. Quessab, S. Manna, S. A. Montoya, A. Kirilyuk, T. Rasing, A. V. Kimel, E. E. Fullerton, Multiscale dynamics of helicity-dependent all-optical magnetization reversal in ferromagnetic co/pt multilayers, Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) 224421.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.224421. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.224421

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.96.224421 2017

  22. [22]

    X. Chen, R. Adam, D. E. Bürgler, F. Wang, Z. Lu, L. Pan, S. Heidtfeld, C. Greb, M. Liu, Q. Liu, J. Wang, C. M. Schneider, D. Cao, Ultrafast demagnetization in ferromagnetic materials: Origins and progress, Physics Reports 1102 (2025) 1–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2024.10.008. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S037015732400379X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.10.008 2025

  23. [23]

    B.Koopmans,G.Malinowski,F.DallaLonga,D.Steiauf,M.Fähnle, T. Roth, M. Cinchetti, M. Aeschlimann, Explaining the paradoxical diversityofultrafastlaser-induceddemagnetization,Naturematerials 9 (3) (2010) 259–265.doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2593. URLhttps://www.nature.com/articles/nmat2593

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2593 2010

  24. [24]

    López-Flores, N

    V. López-Flores, N. Bergeard, V. Halté, C. Stamm, N. Pontius, M. Hehn, E. Otero, E. Beaurepaire, C. Boeglin, Role of critical spin fluctuationsinultrafastdemagnetizationoftransition-metalrare-earth alloys,PhysicalReviewB—CondensedMatterandMaterialsPhysics 87 (21) (2013) 214412

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Kimling, J

    J. Kimling, J. Kimling, R. B. Wilson, B. Hebler, M. Albrecht, D. G. Cahill, Ultrafast demagnetization of fept:cu thin films and the role of magnetic heat capacity, Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014) 224408.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224408. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.224408

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.90.224408 2014

  26. [26]

    Cinchetti, M

    T.Roth,A.J.Schellekens,S.Alebrand,O.Schmitt,D.Steil,B.Koop- mans, M. Cinchetti, M. Aeschlimann, Temperature dependence of laser-induced demagnetization in ni: A key for identifying the un- derlying mechanism, Phys. Rev. X 2 (2012) 021006.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevX.2.021006. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.2.021006

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.2.021006 2012

  27. [27]

    Kimel, R

    A. Kimel, R. Pisarev, J. Hohlfeld, T. Rasing, Ultrafast quenching of the antiferromagnetic order in f e bo 3: Direct optical probing<? format?> of the phonon-magnon coupling, Physical review letters 89 (28) (2002) 287401

    work page 2002

  28. [28]

    X.-X.Zhang,S.Jiang,J.Lee,C.Lee,K.F.Mak,J.Shan,Spindynam- ics slowdown near the antiferromagnetic critical point in atomically thin FePS3, Nano Letters 21 (12) (2021) 5045–5052

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Lichtenberg, C

    T. Lichtenberg, C. F. Schippers, S. C. P. van Kooten, S. G. F. Evers, B. Barcones, M. H. D. Guimarães, B. Koopmans, Anisotropic laser-pulse-inducedmagnetizationdynamicsinvanderwaalsmagnet fe3gete2,2DMaterials10(1)(2022)015008.doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ ac9dab. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ac9dab

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ 2022

  30. [30]

    D. V. Kuntu, E. A. Arkhipova, L. A. Shelukhin, F. Mertens, M. A. Prosnikov, I. A. Eliseyev, A. N. Smirnov, V. Y. Davydov, S. Mañas Valero, E. Coronado, M. Cinchetti, A. M. Kalashnikova, Laser- induced demagnetization in van der waals XY- and Ising-like anti- ferromagnetsNiPS 3 andFePS 3, Phys. Rev. Mater. 8 (2024) 014408. doi:10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.01...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.8.014408 2024

  31. [31]

    Z.Wang,T.Sun,Z.Jiang,M.Yuan,Y.Huang,Y.Ren,D.Hou,T.Li, X. Liu, X. Luo, et al., Acceleration of ultrafast demagnetization in van der waals ferromagnet fe3gete2 in high magnetic field, National Science Review 12 (7) (2025) nwaf185.doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf185. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaf185

    work page doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaf185 2025

  32. [32]

    T. Sun, C. Zhou, Z. Jiang, X. Li, K. Qiu, R. Xiao, C. Liu, Z. Ma, X. Luo, Y. Sun, Z. Sheng, Ultra-long spin relaxation in two- dimensional ferromagnet cr2ge2te6 flake, 2D Materials 8 (4) (2021) 045040.doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ac2ab3. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/ac2ab3

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ac2ab3 2021

  33. [33]

    N. Wu, S. Zhang, D. Chen, Y. Wang, S. Meng, Three-stage ultrafast demagnetizationdynamicsinamonolayerferromagnet,NatureCom- munications 15 (1) (Mar. 2024).doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47128-4. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47128-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47128-4 2024

  34. [34]

    Tomarchio, V

    L. Tomarchio, V. Polewczyk, L. Mosesso, A. Marty, S. Macis, M. Jamet, F. Bonell, S. Lupi, Light-driven electrodynamics and demagnetization in fengete2 (n = 3, 5) thin films, npj 2D Materials andApplications8(1)(Nov.2024).doi:10.1038/s41699-024-00510-8. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41699-024-00510-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41699-024-00510-8 2024

  35. [35]

    Sutcliffe, X

    E. Sutcliffe, X. Sun, I. Verzhbitskiy, T. Griepe, U. Atxitia, G. Eda, E. J. G. Santos, J. O. Johansson, Transient magneto-optical spectrum ofphotoexcitedelectronsinthevanderwaalsferromagnetcr 2ge2te6, Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) 174432.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.174432. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.174432

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.174432 2023

  36. [36]

    Khusyainov, T

    D. Khusyainov, T. Gareev, V. Radovskaia, K. Sampathkumar, S. Acharya, M. Šiškins, S. Mañas-Valero, B. A. Ivanov, E. Coron- ado, T. Rasing, A. V. Kimel, D. Afanasiev, Ultrafast laser-induced spin–lattice dynamics in the van der waals antiferromagnet cops3, APL Materials 11 (7) (2023) 071104.doi:10.1063/5.0146128. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0146128

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0146128 2023

  37. [37]

    C. Kong, X. Liu, K. Wang, X. Zhang, Anomalous critical behavior ofmagneticdynamicsinkagomeantiferromagnetfesn,ACSApplied Electronic Materials 7 (23) (2025) 10753–10760

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Persson, J

    E.B.Thorsteinsson,M.Dahlqvist,A.Elsukova,A.Petruhins,P.O.A. Persson, J. Rosen, A. S. Ingason, F. Magnus, Room temperature ferromagnetism in the nanolaminated max phase (mn1-xcrx)2gac, APL Materials 11 (12) (2023) 121102.doi:10.1063/5.0176571. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0176571

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0176571 2023

  39. [39]

    J. P. Siebert, S. Mallett, M. Juelsholt, H. Pazniak, U. Wiedwald, K.Page,C.S.Birkel,Structuredeterminationandmagneticproperties of the mn-doped max phase cr2gac, Mater. Chem. Front. 5 (2021) 6082–6091.doi:10.1039/D1QM00454A. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D1QM00454A

    work page doi:10.1039/d1qm00454a 2021

  40. [40]

    Petruhins, A

    A. Petruhins, A. S. Ingason, J. Lu, F. Magnus, S. Olafsson, J. Rosen, Synthesis and characterization of magnetic (cr0. 5mn0. 5) 2gac thin films, Journal of Materials Science 50 (13) (2015) 4495–4502

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    A. S. Ingason, G. K. Pálsson, M. Dahlqvist, J. Rosen, Long-range antiferromagnetic order in epitaxialmn2GaCthin films from neutron reflectometry,Phys.Rev.B94(2016)024416.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB. 94.024416. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.024416

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb 2016

  42. [42]

    I. P. Novoselova, A. Petruhins, U. Wiedwald, Á. S. Ingason, T. Hase, F. Magnus, V. Kapaklis, J. Palisaitis, M. Spasova, M. Farle, et al., Large uniaxial magnetostriction with sign inversion at the first order phase transition in the nanolaminated mn2gac max phase, Scientific reports 8 (1) (2018) 2637

    work page 2018

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1063/5.0279839

    E.B.Thorsteinsson,D.Dagbjartsson,A.S.Ingason,F.Magnus,Fer- romagnetismatroomtemperatureincr-dopedpolycrystallinemn2gac maxphasethinfilms,AppliedPhysicsLetters127(5)(2025)052408. doi:10.1063/5.0279839. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0279839

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0279839 2025

  44. [44]

    M. Yan, C. Li, Y. Zou, M. Yang, Synthesis and characterization of magnetic max phase (cr2−𝑥mn𝑥)gac, Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Mater. Sci. Ed. 35 (2) (2020) 363–367.doi:10.1007/ s11595-020-2265-x. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11595-020-2265-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11595-020-2265-x 2020

  45. [45]

    Salikhov, A

    R. Salikhov, A. S. Semisalova, A. Petruhins, A. S. Ingason, J. Rosen, U.Wiedwald,M.Farle,Magneticanisotropyinthe(cr0.5mn0.5)2gac max phase, Materials Research Letters 3 (3) (2015) 156–160. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2015.1036324,doi:10.1080/ 21663831.2015.1036324. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2015.1036324

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2015.1036324 2015

  46. [46]

    C.-C. Lai, Q. Tao, H. Fashandi, U. Wiedwald, R. Salikhov, M. Farle, A. Petruhins, J. Lu, L. Hultman, P. Eklund, J. Rosen, Magnetic properties and structural characterization of layered (cr0.5mn0.5)2auc synthesized by thermally induced substitutional reaction in (cr0.5mn0.5)2gac, APL Materials 6 (2) (2018) 026104. Mogunov Ia. A. et al.:Preprint submitted t...

    work page doi:10.1063/1 2018

  47. [47]

    T. A. Andryushchenko, S. A. Lyaschenko, A. V. Lukyanenko, S. N. Varnakov,S.G.Ovchinnikov,Augerelectronspectroscopyoftheair- exposed(cr 0.5mn0.5)2gacmaxfilmsurface,TechnicalPhysicsLetters 49 (7) (2023) 59–64.doi:10.61011/TPL.2023.07.56448.19430. URLhttps://journals.ioffe.ru/articles/56448

    work page doi:10.61011/tpl.2023.07.56448.19430 2023

  48. [48]

    I. P. Novoselova, A. Petruhins, U. Wiedwald, D. Weller, J. Rosen, M. Farle, R. Salikhov, Long-term stability and thickness dependence of magnetism in thin (cr<sub>0.5</sub>mn<sub>0.5</sub>)<sub>2</sub>gac max phase films, Materials Research Letters 7 (4) (2019) 159–163. doi:10.1080/21663831.2019.1570980. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2019.1570980

    work page doi:10.1080/21663831.2019.1570980 2019

  49. [49]

    Lyaschenko, O

    S. Lyaschenko, O. Maximova, D. Shevtsov, S. Varnakov, I. Tarasov, U. Wiedwald, J. Rosen, S. Ovchinnikov, M. Farle, Optical and magneto-optical properties of epitaxial mn2gac max phase thin film, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 528 (2021) 167803. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167803. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pi...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167803 2021

  50. [50]

    Kuntu, L

    D. Kuntu, L. Shelukhin, A. Kalashnikova, Ultrafast laser-induced demagnetization in thin ferromagnetic galfenol films, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 635 (2025) 173622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173622. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0304885325008546

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2025.173622 2025

  51. [51]

    M.Wietstruk,A.Melnikov,C.Stamm,T.Kachel,N.Pontius,M.Sul- tan, C. Gahl, M. Weinelt, H. A. Dürr, U. Bovensiepen, Hot-electron- driven enhancement of spin-lattice coupling in gd and tb4𝑓ferro- magnetsobservedbyfemtosecondx-raymagneticcirculardichroism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 127401.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106. 127401. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106 2011

  52. [52]

    M.Strungaru,R.F.L.Evans,R.W.Chantrell,Substratecontribution to ultrafast spin dynamics in 2d van der waals magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135 (2025) 076701.doi:10.1103/9q7b-jxx5. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/9q7b-jxx5

    work page doi:10.1103/9q7b-jxx5 2025

  53. [53]

    Couceiro, P

    M. Couceiro, P. Ghamisi, Particle Swarm Optimization, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 1–10.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-319-19635-0_1. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19635-0_1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19635-0_1 2016

  54. [54]

    S. Lin, P. Tong, B. S. Wang, Y. N. Huang, W. J. Lu, D. F. Shao, B. C. Zhao, W. H. Song, Y. P. Sun, Magnetic and electrical/thermal transport properties of mn-doped mn+1axn phase compounds cr2- xmnxgac (0≤x≤1), Journal of Applied Physics 113 (5) (2013) 053502.doi:10.1063/1.4789954. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1063/1.4789954

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4789954 2013

  55. [55]

    H. Tong, S. Lin, Y. Huang, P. Tong, W. Song, Y. Sun, Difference in physical properties of max-phase compounds cr2gac and cr2gan induced by an anomalous structure change in cr2gan, Intermetallics 105 (2019) 39–43.doi:https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2018.11.008. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0966979518309324

    work page doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2018.11.008 2019

  56. [56]

    Körmann, A

    F. Körmann, A. Dick, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, Role of spin quan- tization in determining the thermodynamic properties of magnetic transition metals, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 165114.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevB.83.165114. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.165114

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.83.165114 2011

  57. [57]

    Adhikari, B

    A. Adhikari, B. K. Mahato, S. Sahoo, S. Mukhopadhyay, M. Palit, S. Bera, S. Datta, M. Mondal, A. Barman, Room temperature evolution of laser-induced ultrafast spin and phonon dynamics in 2d van der waals magnets fexgete2 (x = 3, 4, 5), Advanced Functional Materials 35 (13) (2025) 2418006. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202418006. URLhttps://advanced.onl...

    work page doi:10.1002/adfm.202418006 2025

  58. [58]

    J. He, T. Frauenheim, Optically driven ultrafast magnetic order tran- sitions in two-dimensional ferrimagnetic mxenes, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 11 (15) (2020) 6219–6226

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    S. Li, L. Zhou, T. Frauenheim, J. He, Light-controlled ultrafast magnetic state transition in antiferromagnetic–ferromagnetic van der waals heterostructures, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 13 (26) (2022) 6223–6229

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Jiang, A

    X. Jiang, A. V. Kuklin, A. Baev, Y. Ge, H. Ågren, H. Zhang, P. N. Prasad, Two-dimensional mxenes: From morphological to optical, electric, and magnetic properties and applications, Physics Reports 848 (2020) 1–58, two-dimensional MXenes: From morphological to optical, electric, and magnetic properties and applications. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physre...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.12.006 2020