pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10667 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🪐 quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantum Simulation of Magnetic Materials: from Ab-Initio to NISQ

Pascal Stadler , Florian G. Eich , Benedikt M. Schoenauer , Peter Schmitteckert , Michael Marthaler , Gary Schmiedinghoff , Peter K. Schuhmacher , Sebastian Zanker
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum simulationNISQspin-wave spectramagnetic materialsab-initio calculationschromium tri-halideseffective spin modelsreal-time propagation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Simulations of magnetic spin-wave spectra on NISQ quantum computers match classical results for real materials using up to 48 qubits.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that low-energy magnetic excitations in chromium tri-halide monolayers can be obtained by first extracting an effective spin model from ab-initio electronic calculations and then evolving that model in real time on a quantum processor. The resulting spin-wave spectra agree with classical benchmarks for systems reaching 48 qubits while the wall time stays roughly constant instead of growing exponentially. This holds even though the work uses only current NISQ hardware accessed through a commercial cloud platform. The demonstration indicates that domain experts can already run useful material simulations on available quantum devices without waiting for full error-corrected quantum advantage.

Core claim

By mapping ab-initio results for two-dimensional magnets to an effective spin Hamiltonian and performing real-time propagation on a quantum processor, the authors obtain low-energy spin excitations that match classical simulations for systems with up to 48 qubits, with wall-time scaling that remains quasi-constant rather than exponential.

What carries the argument

Real-time propagation of the effective spin model on the NISQ quantum processor to compute spin-wave spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The effective spin model extracted from ab-initio calculations faithfully captures the low-energy magnetic excitations of the real material, and NISQ noise does not distort the simulated spectra beyond the reported agreement.

What would settle it

A clear mismatch between the quantum-simulated spin-wave spectra and independent classical or experimental data for a larger system or different material where the spin model approximation is known to fail.

read the original abstract

Quantum computers are increasingly accessible, yet demonstrations of physically meaningful simulations for real materials remain scarce. In our work we simulate low-energy magnetic excitations, specifically spin-wave spectra, of chromium tri-halide monolayers. Starting from ab-initio electronic structure calculations for these two-dimensional magnets, we derive an effective spin model and simulate low-energy spin excitations using a real-time propagation of the spin system on the commercial quantum computing cloud platform IQM Resonance. The results for systems with up to 48 qubits are validated against classical benchmarks. While some spectral features remain challenging for today's NISQ devices, our simulation achieves good agreement at quasi-constant wall-time scaling, compared to the exponential scaling of classical methods. Our results demonstrate that, even in the absence of quantum advantage, useful quantum simulations of real materials are becoming possible for domain experts via commercial cloud access to quantum computers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a workflow starting from ab-initio electronic structure calculations for chromium tri-halide monolayers to derive effective spin models, followed by real-time propagation of spin excitations on the IQM Resonance NISQ platform for systems up to 48 qubits. It reports validation against classical benchmarks, quasi-constant wall-time scaling (contrasted with exponential classical scaling), and concludes that useful quantum simulations of real materials are feasible for domain experts via commercial cloud access even without quantum advantage.

Significance. If the validation protocol is made rigorous and quantitative, the work demonstrates a practical end-to-end pipeline from first-principles materials modeling to NISQ execution, which could lower barriers for condensed-matter researchers to experiment with quantum hardware. The focus on physically relevant 2D magnets and explicit scaling comparison provides a concrete benchmark for the current state of cloud-based quantum simulation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of 'good agreement' and scaling advantage for up to 48-qubit results rests on validation against classical benchmarks. Because exact classical simulation (full diagonalization or exact time evolution) is intractable at this scale, the benchmarks must employ approximations such as linear spin-wave theory, classical Monte Carlo, or mean-field dynamics. The manuscript must specify the exact classical methods employed, report quantitative metrics (e.g., spectral overlap, RMS deviation, or fidelity with error bars), and discuss how NISQ noise and decoherence are mitigated or quantified so that agreement can be interpreted as faithful reproduction of the quantum spectra rather than agreement with an approximation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The statement that 'some spectral features remain challenging' is vague; a brief enumeration of which features and the associated error sources would improve clarity without lengthening the abstract.
  2. The manuscript should include a short discussion of the assumptions underlying the ab-initio to effective spin-model mapping, particularly for 2D systems where quantum fluctuations can be pronounced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the need for more rigorous specification of the validation protocol. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarifications in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim of 'good agreement' and scaling advantage for up to 48-qubit results rests on validation against classical benchmarks. Because exact classical simulation (full diagonalization or exact time evolution) is intractable at this scale, the benchmarks must employ approximations such as linear spin-wave theory, classical Monte Carlo, or mean-field dynamics. The manuscript must specify the exact classical methods employed, report quantitative metrics (e.g., spectral overlap, RMS deviation, or fidelity with error bars), and discuss how NISQ noise and decoherence are mitigated or quantified so that agreement can be interpreted as faithful reproduction of the quantum spectra rather than agreement with an approximation.

    Authors: We agree that exact classical simulation is intractable beyond small system sizes and that the benchmarks necessarily rely on approximations. In the original manuscript the classical reference is linear spin-wave theory (LSWT), which is the standard analytic approach for computing spin-wave spectra in these Heisenberg-like models; this is already implicit in the derivation of the effective spin Hamiltonian from ab-initio calculations but was not stated explicitly in the abstract or methods. In the revision we will (i) name LSWT as the benchmark method, (ii) add quantitative metrics including the spectral overlap integral and root-mean-square deviation between the quantum and LSWT spectra together with statistical error bars obtained from repeated circuit executions, and (iii) expand the discussion of noise mitigation to include the specific error-mitigation protocols (readout-error correction and zero-noise extrapolation) employed on the IQM Resonance platform and how residual decoherence affects the extracted spectra. These additions will be placed in a new subsection on validation and will also be reflected in an updated abstract. We believe the revised presentation will allow readers to interpret the reported agreement as a faithful reproduction of the target quantum spectra within the stated approximations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper derives an effective spin model from ab-initio electronic structure calculations, performs real-time propagation on NISQ hardware for up to 48 qubits, and validates spectral results against independent classical benchmarks. No equations reduce by construction to fitted parameters or self-defined quantities; the central simulation and validation steps rely on external ab-initio inputs and separate classical methods rather than renaming or fitting the target result itself. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the uniqueness or ansatz of the core workflow.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on two domain assumptions: that the ab-initio-derived effective spin Hamiltonian accurately represents low-energy physics, and that the NISQ real-time evolution faithfully reproduces the target spectra within reported agreement.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Effective spin model derived from ab-initio electronic structure calculations accurately captures the low-energy magnetic excitations
    Invoked as the starting point for the quantum simulation step

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1117 out tokens · 50373 ms · 2026-05-12T03:52:46.255218+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Accessed 2026-03-17

    Google Quantum AI and Collaborators: Observation of constructive interference at the edge of quantum ergodicity646(8086), 825–830 https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-025-09526-6 . Accessed 2026-03-17

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    arXiv:2510.19550 (2025)

    Zhang, C., Corti˜ nas, R.G., Karamlou, A.H., Noll, N., Provazza, J., Bausch, J., Shirobokov, S., White, A., Claassen, M., Kang, S.H., Senior, A.W., Tomaˇ sev, N., Gross, J., Lee, K., Schuster, T., Huggins, W.J., Celik, H., Greene, A., Kozlovskii, B., Heras, F.J.H., Bengtsson, A., Grajales Dau, A., Drozdov, I., Ying, B., Living- stone, W., Sivak, V., Yosri...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.19550 2025

  3. [3]

    Sci- ence (2026) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea3321

    Ronˇ cevi´ c, I., Paschke, F., Gao, Y., Lieske, L.-A., G¨ odde, L.A., Barison, S., Piccinelli, S., Baiardi, A., Tavernelli, I., Repp, J., Albrecht, F., Anderson, H.L., Gross, L.: A molecule with half-m¨ obius topology. Sci- ence (2026) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aea3321 . Published online March 5, 2026

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aea3321 2026

  4. [4]

    arXiv:2510.26300 (2025)

    Alam, F., Bosse, J.L., ˇCepait˙ e, I., Chapman, A., Clin- ton, L., Crichigno, M., Crosson, E., Cubitt, T., Derby, C., Dowinton, O., Eassa, N., Faehrmann, P.K., Flam- mia, S., Flynn, B., Gambetta, F.M., Garc´ ıa-Patr´ on, R., Hunter-Gordon, M., Jones, G., Khedkar, A., Klassen, J., Kreshchuk, M., McMullan, E.H., Mineh, L., Mon- tanaro, A., Mora, C., Morton,...

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    11 Nature Physics21, 289–297 (2025) https://doi.org/10

    Maskara, N., Ostermann, S., Shee, J., Kalinowski, M., McClain Gomez, A., Araiza Bravo, R., Wang, D.S., Krylov, A.I., Yao, N.Y., Head-Gordon, M., Lukin, M.D., Yelin, S.F.: Programmable simulations of molecules and materials with reconfigurable quantum processors. 11 Nature Physics21, 289–297 (2025) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41567-024-02738-z

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Benchmarking quantum simulation with neutron-scattering experiments

    Lee, Y.-T., Kumaran, K., Pokharel, B., Scheie, A., Sarkis, C.L., Tennant, D.A., Humble, T., Schleife, A., Kandala, A., Banerjee, A.: Benchmarking quantum simulation with neutron- scattering experiments. arXiv:2603.15608 (2026). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.15608

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.15608 2026

  7. [7]

    Evidence for the utility of quantum computing before fault tolerance

    Kim, Y., Eddins, A., Anand, S., Wei, K., Berg, E., Rosenblatt, S., Nayfeh, H., Wu, Y., Zaletel, M., Temme, K.: Evidence for the utility of quantum comput- ing before fault tolerance. Nature618(7965), 500–505 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3 2023

  8. [8]

    Accessed 2026-01-06

    Zimbor´ as, Z., Portik, A., Aguirre, D., Pe˜ na, R., Svastits, D., P´ alyi, A., M´ arton, A., Asb´ oth, J.K., Kockum, A.F., Sanz, M., K´ alm´ an, O., Monz, T., Wilhelm-Mauch, F.: The EU Quantum Flagship’s Key Performance Indica- tors for Quantum Computing https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2512.19653 2512.19653. Accessed 2026-01-06

    work page arXiv 2026

  9. [9]

    PRX Quantum3(4), 040318 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040318

    Tazhigulov, R.N., Sun, S.-N., Haghshenas, R., Zhai, H., Tan, A.T.K., Rubin, N.C., Babbush, R., Minnich, A.J., Chan, G.K.-L.: Simulating models of challenging corre- lated molecules and materials on the sycamore quantum processor. PRX Quantum3(4), 040318 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.040318

    work page doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.040318 2022

  10. [10]

    Nature Communications13, 5743 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33335-4

    Stanisic, S., Bosse, J.L., Gambetta, F.M., Santos, R.A., Mruczkiewicz, W., O’Brien, T.E., Ostby, E., Montanaro, A.: Observing ground-state properties of the fermi- hubbard model using a scalable algorithm on a quantum computer. Nature Communications13, 5743 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33335-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33335-4 2022

  11. [11]

    2025 , doi =

    Robledo-Moreno, J., Motta, M., Haas, H., Javadi- Abhari, A., Jurcevic, P., Kirby, W., Martiel, S., Sharma, K., Sharma, S., Shirakawa, T., Sitdikov, I., Sun, R.- Y., Sung, K.J., Takita, M., Tran, M.C., Yunoki, S., Mezzacapo, A.: Chemistry beyond the scale of exact diagonalization on a quantum-centric supercomputer. Science Advances11(25), 9991 (2025) https...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adu9991 2025

  12. [12]

    npj Computa- tional Materials11, 325 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41524-025-01772-6

    Selisko, J., Amsler, M., Wever, C., Kawashima, Y., Samsonidze, G., Ul Haq, R., Tacchino, F., Taver- nelli, I., Eckl, T.: Dynamical mean field theory for real materials on a quantum computer. npj Computa- tional Materials11, 325 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41524-025-01772-6

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Nature549(7671), 242–246 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23879

    Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J.M., Gambetta, J.M.: Hardware- efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature549(7671), 242–246 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23879

    work page doi:10.1038/nature23879 2017

  14. [14]

    Arute, K

    Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J.C., Barends, R., Bengtsson, A., Boixo, S., Broughton, M., et al.: Observation of separated dynamics of charge and spin in the Fermi-Hubbard model. arXiv:2010.07965 (2020). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.07965

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07965 2010

  15. [15]

    Gajewski, M., Somoza, A.D., Schmiedinghoff, G., Stadler, P., Marthaler, M., Horstmann, B.: Simulat- ing Electron Transfer on Noisy Quantum Computers: A Scalable Approach to Open Quantum Systems https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.18141

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.18141

  16. [16]

    Nature546(7657), 265–269 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22060

    Gong, C., Li, L., Li, Z., Ji, H., Stern, A., Xia, Y., Cao, T., Bao, W., Wang, C., Wang, Y., Qiu, Z.Q., Cava, R.J., Louie, S.G., Xia, J., Zhang, X.: Discov- ery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der waals crystals. Nature546(7657), 265–269 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22060

    work page doi:10.1038/nature22060 2017

  17. [17]

    Nature546(7657), 270–273 (2017) https://doi

    Huang, B., Clark, G., Navarro-Moratalla, E., Klein, D.R., Cheng, R., Seyler, K.L., Zhong, D., Schmidgall, E., McGuire, M.A., Cobden, D.H., Yao, W., Xiao, D., Jarillo-Herrero, P., Xu, X.: Layer-dependent ferromag- netism in a van der waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature546(7657), 270–273 (2017) https://doi. org/10.1038/nature22391

    work page doi:10.1038/nature22391 2017

  18. [18]

    Chen, L., Chung, J.-H., Gao, B., Chen, T., Stone, M.B., Kolesnikov, A.I., Huang, Q., Dai, P.: Topological spin excitations in honeycomb ferromagnet cri 3. Phys. Rev. X8, 041028 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX. 8.041028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx 2018

  19. [19]

    Cai, Z., Bao, S., Gu, Z.-L., Gao, Y.-P., Ma, Z., Shang- guan, Y., Si, W., Dong, Z.-Y., Wang, W., Wu, Y., Lin, D., Wang, J., Ran, K., Li, S., Adroja, D., Xi, X., Yu, S.-L., Wu, X., Li, J.-X., Wen, J.: Topological magnon insulator spin excitations in the two-dimensional ferro- magnet crbr 3. Phys. Rev. B104, 020402 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.1...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.l020402 2021

  20. [20]

    2D Materials9(1), 015006 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/2053-1583/ac2e7a

    Chen, L., Stone, M.B., Kolesnikov, A.I., Winn, B., Shon, W., Dai, P., Chung, J.-H.: Massless dirac magnons in the two dimensional van der waals honeycomb magnet crcl3. 2D Materials9(1), 015006 (2021) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/2053-1583/ac2e7a

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ac2e7a 2021

  21. [21]

    Nature Physics7(9), 725–730 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2041

    Le Tacon, M., Ghiringhelli, G., Chaloupka, J., Sala, M.M., Hinkov, V., Haverkort, M.W., Minola, M., Bakr, M., Zhou, K.J., Blanco-Canosa, S., Monney, C., Song, Y.T., Sun, G.L., Lin, C.T., De Luca, G.M., Salluzzo, M., Khaliullin, G., Schmitt, T., Braicovich, L., Keimer, B.: Intense paramagnon excitations in a large family of high- temperature superconductor...

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys2041 2011

  22. [22]

    Materials16(3) (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Yoshihara, A.: Brillouin light scattering from magnetic excitations. Materials16(3) (2023) https://doi.org/10. 3390/ma16031038

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Kepaptsoglou, D., Castellanos-Reyes, J. ´A., Kerrigan, A., Nascimento, J., Zeiger, P.M., El hajraoui, K., Idrobo, J.C., Mendis, B.G., Bergman, A., Lazarov, V.K., Rusz, 12 J., Ramasse, Q.M.: Magnon spectroscopy in the elec- tron microscope. Nature644(8075), 83–88 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09318-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09318-y 2025

  24. [24]

    The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics (2025) https://doi

    Schoenauer, B.M., Enenkel, N., Eich, F.G., Rybkin, V.V., Marthaler, M., Zanker, S., Schmitteckert, P.: A method to derive material-specific model descriptions of spin degrees of freedom coupled to a fermionic bath for materials displaying prevalent spin physics. The Euro- pean Physical Journal Special Topics (2025) https://doi. org/10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01922-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjs/s11734-025-01922-3 2025

  25. [25]

    https:// meetiqm.com/products/iqm-resonance/ Accessed 2026- 03-23

    IQM Quantum Computers: IQM Resonance. https:// meetiqm.com/products/iqm-resonance/ Accessed 2026- 03-23

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    2D Materials , author =

    Haastrup, S., Strange, M., Pandey, M., Deilmann, T., Schmidt, P.S., Hinsche, N.F., Gjerding, M.N., Torelli, D., Larsen, P.M., Riis-Jensen, A.C., Gath, J., Jacob- sen, K.W., Jørgen Mortensen, J., Olsen, T., Thygesen, K.S.: The computational 2d materials database: high- throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Materials5(4), 042002 ...

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 2018

  27. [27]

    2D Materials , author =

    Gjerding, M.N., Taghizadeh, A., Rasmussen, A., Ali, S., Bertoldo, F., Deilmann, T., Knøsgaard, N.R., Kruse, M., Larsen, A.H., Manti, S., Pedersen, T.G., Petralanda, U., Skovhus, T., Svendsen, M.K., Mortensen, J.J., Olsen, T., Thygesen, K.S.: Recent progress of the computational 2d materials database (c2db). 2D Materials8(4), 044002 (2021) https://doi.org/...

    work page doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ac1059 2021

  28. [28]

    Phys- ical Review A94(5), 052325 (2016) https://doi.org/10

    Wallman, J.J., Emerson, J.: Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling. Phys- ical Review A94(5), 052325 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.94.052325

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Physi- cal Review A105(3), 032620 (2022) https://doi.org/10

    Berg, E., Minev, Z.K., Temme, K.: Model-free readout- error mitigation for quantum expectation values. Physi- cal Review A105(3), 032620 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevA.105.032620

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Marthaler, M., Pinski, P., Rybkin, V., Schwenk, I., Stadler, P., Walt, M.: What is a good use case for quan- tum computers? (2025) arXiv:2506.15426 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  31. [31]

    Babbush, R

    Babbush, R., King, R., Boixo, S., Huggins, W., Khattar, T., Low, G.H., McClean, J.R., O’Brien, T., Rubin, N.C.: The grand challenge of quantum applications. arXiv preprint (2025) arXiv:2511.09124 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Schmitteckert, P.: Nonequilibrium electron transport using the density matrix renormalization group method. Phys. Rev. B70, 121302 (2004) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.70.121302

    work page 2004

  33. [33]

    White, S.R., Feiguin, A.E.: Real-time evolution using the density matrix renormalization group. Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 076401 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.93.076401

    work page 2004

  34. [34]

    Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials67(1), 65–74 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0304-8853(87)90721-9

    Liechtenstein, A.I., Katsnelson, M.I., Antropov, V.P., Gubanov, V.A.: Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials67(1), 65–74 (1987) https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0304-8853(87)90721-9

    work page 1987

  35. [35]

    Computer Physics Communications 264, 107938 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021

    He, X., Helbig, N., Verstraete, M.J., Bousquet, E.: Tb2j: A python package for computing magnetic inter- action parameters. Computer Physics Communications 264, 107938 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021. 107938

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021 2021

  36. [36]

    Nano Letters22(21), 8771–8778 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett

    Esteras, D.L., Rybakov, A., Ruiz, A.M., Baldov´ ı, J.J.: Magnon straintronics in the 2d van der waals ferro- magnet crsbr from first-principles. Nano Letters22(21), 8771–8778 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett. 2c02863 . PMID: 36162813

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett 2022

  37. [37]

    Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation16(2), 1007– 1017 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01064

    Tancogne-Dejean, N., Eich, F.G., Rubio, A.: Time- dependent magnons from first principles. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation16(2), 1007– 1017 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01064 . PMID: 31922758

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01064 2020

  38. [38]

    Gorni, T., Baseggio, O., Delugas, P., Timrov, I., Baroni, S.: First-principles study of the gap in the spin exci- tation spectrum of the cri 3 honeycomb ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B107, 220410 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.107.L220410

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Delugas, P., Baseggio, O., Timrov, I., Baroni, S., Gorni, T.: Magnon-phonon interactions enhance the gap at the dirac point in the spin-wave spectra of cri 3 two- dimensional magnets. Phys. Rev. B107, 214452 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.214452

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.107.214452 2023

  40. [40]

    M¨ uller, M.C.T.D., Friedrich, C., Bl¨ ugel, S.: Acoustic magnons in the long-wavelength limit: Investigating the goldstone violation in many-body perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. B94, 064433 (2016) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.94.064433

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Olsen, T.: Unified treatment of magnons and excitons in monolayer cri3 from many-body perturbation theory. Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 166402 (2021) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.127.166402

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Esquembre-Kuˇ cukali´ c, A., Le, K.B., Garc´ ıa-Crist´ obal, A., Bernardi, M., Sangalli, D., Molina-S´ anchez, A.: Magnons in chromium trihalides calculated with the ab initio bethe-salpeter equation. Phys. Rev. B112, 184412 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/gbpw-zh1v

    work page doi:10.1103/gbpw-zh1v 2025

  43. [43]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2404

    Shirazi, R.G., Schoenauer, B.M., Schmitteckert, P., Marthaler, M., Rybkin, V.: Understanding Radicals via Orbital Parities (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2404. 18787

    work page 2024

  44. [44]

    Sun , author T

    Sun, Q., Berkelbach, T.C., Blunt, N.S., Booth, G.H., Guo, S., Li, Z., Liu, J., McClain, J.D., Sayfutyarova, 13 E.R., Sharma, S., Wouters, S., Chan, G.K.-L.: Pyscf: the python-based simulations of chemistry framework. WIREs Computational Molecular Science8(1), 1340 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1340

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1340 2018

  45. [45]

    The Journal of Chemical Physics153(2), 024109 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0006074

    Sun, Q., Zhang, X., Banerjee, S., Bao, P., Barbry, M., Blunt, N.S., Bogdanov, N.A., Booth, G.H., Chen, J., Cui, Z.-H., Eriksen, J.J., Gao, Y., Guo, S., Hermann, J., Hermes, M.R., Koh, K., Koval, P., Lehtola, S., Li, Z., Liu, J., Mardirossian, N., McClain, J.D., Motta, M., Mussard, B., Pham, H.Q., Pulkin, A., Purwanto, W., Robinson, P.J., Ronca, E., Sayfut...

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Weigend, F., Ahlrichs, R.: Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for h to rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.7, 3297–3305 (2005) https: //doi.org/10.1039/B508541A

    work page doi:10.1039/b508541a 2005

  47. [47]

    GitHub repository

    GmbH, H.Q.S.: Active Space Finder. GitHub repository. [Online]. Available: https://github. com/HQSquantumsimulations/ActiveSpaceFinder. Accessed: Jan. 19, 2026 (2025)

    work page 2026

  48. [48]

    Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1976)

    Ashcroft, N.W., Mermin, N.D.: Solid State Physics, 1st edn. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1976)

    work page 1976

  49. [49]

    Fratus, K.R., Enenkel, N., Zanker, S., Reiner, J.- M., Marthaler, M., Schmitteckert, P.: Can a quan- tum computer simulate nuclear magnetic resonance spectra better than a classical one? arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06448 (2025) arXiv:2508.06448 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    In: Nagel, W.E., Kr¨ oner, D.B., Resch, M.M

    Ulbricht, T., Schmitteckert, P.: Signal transport in and conductance of correlated nanostructures. In: Nagel, W.E., Kr¨ oner, D.B., Resch, M.M. (eds.) High Perfor- mance Computing in Science and Engineering ’08, pp. 71–82. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Physica Scripta2012(T151), 014059 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2012/T151/014059

    Schmitteckert, P.: On the relaxation toward equilibrium in an isolated strongly correlated one-dimensional bose gas. Physica Scripta2012(T151), 014059 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/2012/T151/014059

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/2012/t151/014059 2012

  52. [52]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08223 14

    Sun, Q., Berkelbach, T.C., Blunt, N.S., Booth, G.H., Guo, S., Li, Z., Liu, J., McClain, J., Sayfutyarova, E.R., Sharma, S., Wouters, S., Chan, G.K.-L.: The Python- based Simulations of Chemistry Framework (PySCF) (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.08223 14

    work page arXiv 2017