pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10697 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Incompressible Extended Magnetohydrodynamics Waves: Implications of Electron Inertia

Noura E. Shorba , Abeer A. Mahmoud , Hamdi M. Abdelhamid
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords extended magnetohydrodynamicsplasma wavesdispersion relationelectron inertiaincompressible plasmaHall MHDwhistler wavesion cyclotron waves
0
0 comments X

The pith

Incompressible XMHD yields dispersion relations for plasma waves that saturate at the ion and electron gyrofrequencies without the singularities of Hall MHD.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the dispersion relation for waves in an incompressible plasma by applying the geometric optics ansatz to the extended magnetohydrodynamics equations that include both Hall drift and electron inertia. It obtains explicit branches for ion cyclotron waves and whistler waves, each approaching a constant frequency at large wave numbers. A reader cares because the resulting relations remain well-behaved where earlier Hall MHD models produce unphysical divergences, thereby offering a practical intermediate description between simplified fluid models and full two-fluid treatments of small-scale plasma dynamics.

Core claim

The central claim is that the incompressible XMHD dispersion relation, derived from the linearized equations under the geometric optics ansatz, produces ion cyclotron and whistler branches that saturate at the ion and electron gyrofrequencies respectively; the same relation removes the singularities that appear in Hall MHD at high wave numbers while reproducing more of the physics present in the complete two-fluid model.

What carries the argument

The dispersion relation obtained by linearizing the incompressible XMHD equations (with Hall term and electron inertia) under the geometric optics ansatz for perturbed quantities.

If this is right

  • Ion cyclotron waves saturate at the ion gyrofrequency and whistler waves at the electron gyrofrequency.
  • Solutions remain finite at all wave numbers, eliminating the singularities of Hall MHD.
  • Eigenvector solutions for the perturbed fields become available for the full set of XMHD variables.
  • The model captures additional two-fluid physics at scales where electron inertia matters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same regularization may allow stable numerical evolution of reconnection or turbulence problems at electron inertial scales without artificial damping.
  • Dispersion curves from this relation could serve as a benchmark for comparing reduced-fluid codes against particle-in-cell simulations in the whistler regime.
  • The saturation behavior implies that wave energy does not cascade to arbitrarily high frequencies, which could alter estimates of dissipation rates in space plasmas.

Load-bearing premise

The plasma remains incompressible and the geometric optics approximation accurately describes the small perturbations.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement or kinetic simulation that tracks whistler-wave phase speed at wave numbers comparable to the electron inertial length and checks whether the frequency levels off at the electron gyrofrequency as predicted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10697 by Abeer A. Mahmoud, Hamdi M. Abdelhamid, Noura E. Shorba.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) Dispersion relation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Dispersion relation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper explores plasma wave modes using the extended magnetohydrodynamics (XMHD) model, incorporating Hall drift and electron inertia effects. We utilize the geometric optics ansatz to study perturbed quantities, with a focus on incompressible systems. Our research concludes with the derivation of the dispersion relation for incompressible XMHD and the associated eigenvector solutions, offering new perspectives on plasma wave behavior under these extended scenarios. The dispersion relation shows distinct ion cyclotron and whistler wave branches, with characteristic saturation at the ion and electron gyrofrequencies, respectively. Comparisons between Hall MHD and XMHD demonstrate that XMHD provides a more accurate representation of plasma dynamics, especially at higher wave numbers, bridging the gap between simplified models and comprehensive two-fluid descriptions and smoothing out singularities present in Hall MHD solutions and capturing more physics of the full two-fluid model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper derives the dispersion relation and eigenvector solutions for waves in incompressible extended magnetohydrodynamics (XMHD) using the geometric optics ansatz. It identifies distinct ion-cyclotron and whistler branches that saturate at the ion and electron gyrofrequencies, respectively, and claims that XMHD provides a more accurate representation than Hall MHD at high wave numbers by smoothing singularities and capturing additional two-fluid physics.

Significance. If the central derivation is sound, the work supplies a practical intermediate model between simplified MHD and full two-fluid descriptions, with potential utility for high-frequency plasma wave analysis where electron inertia matters.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the dispersion relation and eigenvectors are stated to have been derived, but no explicit equations, steps, or validation against two-fluid solutions are shown; this prevents verification that the saturation behavior and singularity removal follow rigorously from the XMHD equations under the stated assumptions.
  2. Assumptions (incompressibility and geometric optics ansatz): these are invoked from the outset and are load-bearing for the high-k accuracy and singularity-smoothing claims; the abstract supplies no explicit check that the eigenvector solutions or saturation survive when finite compressibility or non-local effects are restored.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would be strengthened by including the explicit form of the dispersion relation or at least the key parameters used in the Hall-MHD comparisons.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments in detail below, providing clarifications and indicating the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the dispersion relation and eigenvectors are stated to have been derived, but no explicit equations, steps, or validation against two-fluid solutions are shown; this prevents verification that the saturation behavior and singularity removal follow rigorously from the XMHD equations under the stated assumptions.

    Authors: The abstract is intended as a concise overview and does not include detailed equations, which are instead derived step-by-step in the main body of the paper (specifically in Sections II and III). The dispersion relation is obtained by substituting the geometric optics ansatz into the linearized incompressible XMHD equations and solving the resulting eigenvalue problem. To facilitate verification, we have revised the abstract to include references to the key equations (e.g., the form of the dispersion relation) and added a brief validation subsection comparing the high-k limits to known two-fluid results, confirming the saturation at the gyrofrequencies and the smoothing of singularities present in Hall MHD. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Assumptions (incompressibility and geometric optics ansatz): these are invoked from the outset and are load-bearing for the high-k accuracy and singularity-smoothing claims; the abstract supplies no explicit check that the eigenvector solutions or saturation survive when finite compressibility or non-local effects are restored.

    Authors: We agree that the assumptions are central to the analysis. The incompressible limit is appropriate for waves where the frequency is high compared to the sound wave frequency, as is the case for the ion cyclotron and whistler branches considered here. The geometric optics ansatz allows for a local dispersion relation in the high-k regime. While a full restoration of compressibility would require solving a more complex system, we have added a paragraph in the discussion section explaining that the saturation behavior is robust and persists in the compressible two-fluid model at high k, based on asymptotic analysis. Non-local effects are outside the scope of the local approximation used. The abstract has been updated to explicitly state the assumptions and their range of validity. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation follows directly from stated XMHD equations under explicit assumptions

full rationale

The paper starts from the incompressible XMHD equations, applies the geometric optics (WKB) ansatz to perturbations as an explicit modeling choice, and derives the dispersion relation plus eigenvectors. No parameter is fitted and then relabeled as a prediction, no self-citation is invoked to justify a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the saturation behavior at gyrofrequencies emerges as a direct algebraic consequence of the electron-inertia term rather than being presupposed. The comparison to Hall MHD singularities is a model-difference result, not a definitional tautology. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents identification of specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work appears to rest on standard MHD assumptions plus the added electron inertia term and the incompressibility constraint.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5446 in / 1137 out tokens · 31255 ms · 2026-05-12T04:48:37.072220+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (∇ ×B 0)× ˜B∗0 ρ0 # −i ¯di∇φ×

    + i δ ∇φ×(˜ v0 ×B ∗ 0) −δ ¯di∇ × " (∇ ×B 0)× ˜B∗0 ρ0 # −i ¯di∇φ× " (∇ ×B 0)× ˜B∗0 ρ0 # −δ ¯di∇ × " (∇ × ˜B 0 )×B ∗ 0 ρ0 # −i ¯di∇φ× " (∇ × ˜B 0 )×B ∗ 0 ρ0 # −i ¯di∇ × " (∇φ× ˜B 0 )×B ∗ 0 ρ0 # + ¯di δ ∇φ× " (∇φ× ˜B 0 )×B ∗ 0 ρ0 # +δ2 ¯d2 e∇ × (∇ ×B 0) ρ0 ×(∇ ט v0) +iδ ¯d2 e∇φ× (∇ ×B 0) ρ0 ×(∇ ט v0) +iδ ¯d2 e∇ × (∇ ×B 0) ρ0 ×(∇φט v0) +i ¯d2 e∇φ× (∇ ×B 0)...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Hall MHD Regime: Let us consider the scenario where Hall effects are significant but electron inertia is negligible,d e →0, known as the Hall regime. Under this condition, the dispersion (30) simplifies to, ρ0ω2 −(k·B 0)2 2 − ¯d2 i ω2k2(k·B 0)2 = 0,(32) indicating two branches: the shear-Whistler mode and the magnetosonic-cyclotron mode. This dispersion r...

    work page

  3. [3]

    eliminating

    Ideal MHD Regime: Consider the limits where both electron inertia and Hall effect are negligible, i.e.,d i →0,d e →0. This signifies operation in the ideal MHD domain. Thus, the dispersion relation for ideal MHD can be obtained as, ρ0ω2 −(k·B 0)2 2 = 0,(33) which corresponds to the shear Alfv´ en waves of ideal MHD, as noted in [36]. The dispersion relati...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Kimura and P

    K. Kimura and P. J. Morrison, On energy conservation in extended magnetohydrodynamics, Physics of Plasmas21, 10.1063/1.4890955 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4890955 2014

  5. [5]

    Abdelhamid, Y

    H. Abdelhamid, Y. Kawazura, and Z. Yoshida, Hamiltonian formalism of extended magnetohydrodynamics, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical48, 10.1088/1751-8113/48/23/235502 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8113/48/23/235502 2015

  6. [6]

    I. K. Charidakos, M. Lingam, P. J. Morrison, R. L. White, and A. Wurm, Action principles for extended magnetohydro- dynamic models, Physics of Plasmas21, 10.1063/1.4896336 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4896336 2014

  7. [7]

    Lingam, P

    M. Lingam, P. J. Morrison, and G. Miloshevich, Remarkable connections between extended magnetohydrodynamics models, Physics of Plasmas22, 10.1063/1.4926821 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4926821 2015

  8. [8]

    M. Hirota, Linearized dynamical system for extended magnetohydrodynamics in terms of lagrangian displacement fields and isovortical perturbations, Physics of Plasmas28, 10.1063/5.0037819 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0037819 2021

  9. [9]

    Grasso, E

    D. Grasso, E. Tassi, H. M. Abdelhamid, and P. J. Morrison, Structure and computation of two-dimensional incompressible extended mhd, Physics of Plasmas24, 10.1063/1.4974039 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4974039 2017

  10. [10]

    Andr´ es, P

    N. Andr´ es, P. Dmitruk, and D. G´ omez, Influence of the hall effect and electron inertia in collisionless magnetic reconnection, Physics of Plasmas23, 10.1063/1.4942418 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4942418 2016

  11. [11]

    Andr´ es, L

    N. Andr´ es, L. Martin, P. Dmitruk, and D. G´ omez, Effects of electron inertia in collisionless magnetic reconnection, Physics of Plasmas21, 10.1063/1.4890021 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4890021 2014

  12. [12]

    H. M. Abdelhamid, M. Lingam, and S. M. Mahajan, Extended mhd turbulence and its applications to the solar wind, The Astrophysical Journal829, 87 (2016). 10

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Lingam and A

    M. Lingam and A. Bhattacharjee, A heuristic model for mri turbulent stresses in hall mhd, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society460, 478 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Andr´ es, F

    N. Andr´ es, F. Sahraoui, S. Galtier, L. Z. Hadid, R. Ferrand, and S. Y. Huang, Energy cascade rate measured in a collisionless space plasma with mms data and compressible hall magnetohydrodynamic turbulence theory, Physical Review Letters123, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.245101 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.245101 2019

  15. [15]

    Andr´ es, C

    N. Andr´ es, C. Gonzalez, L. Martin, P. Dmitruk, and D. G´ omez, Two-fluid turbulence including electron inertia, Physics of Plasmas21, 10.1063/1.4903907 (2014)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4903907 2014

  16. [16]

    Lingam and S

    M. Lingam and S. M. Mahajan, Modelling astrophysical outflows via the unified dynamo-reverse dynamo mechanism, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters449, L36 (2015)

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    S. M. Mahajan, N. L. Shatashvili, S. V. Mikeladze, and K. I. Sigua, Acceleration of plasma flows due to reverse dynamo mechanism, The Astrophysical Journal634, 419 (2005)

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    Verscharen, R

    D. Verscharen, R. T. Wicks, O. Alexandrova, R. Bruno, D. Burgess, C. H. Chen, R. D’Amicis, J. D. Keyser, T. D. de Wit, L. Franci, J. He, P. Henri, S. Kasahara, Y. Khotyaintsev, K. G. Klein, B. Lavraud, B. A. Maruca, M. Maksimovic, F. Plaschke, S. Poedts, C. S. Reynolds, O. Roberts, F. Sahraoui, S. Saito, C. S. Salem, J. Saur, S. Servidio, J. E. Stawarz, ˇ...

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Bandyopadhyay, A

    R. Bandyopadhyay, A. Chasapis, R. Chhiber, T. N. Parashar, B. A. Maruca, W. H. Matthaeus, S. J. Schwartz, S. Eriksson, O. L. Contel, H. Breuillard, J. L. Burch, T. E. Moore, C. J. Pollock, B. L. Giles, W. R. Paterson, J. Dorelli, D. J. Gershman, R. B. Torbert, C. T. Russell, and R. J. Strangeway, Solar wind turbulence studies using mms fast plasma investi...

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Chasapis, W

    A. Chasapis, W. H. Matthaeus, T. N. Parashar, O. LeContel, A. Retin` o, H. Breuillard, Y. Khotyaintsev, A. Vaivads, B. Lavraud, E. Eriksson, T. E. Moore, J. L. Burch, R. B. Torbert, P.-A. Lindqvist, R. E. Ergun, G. Marklund, K. A. Goodrich, F. D. Wilder, M. Chutter, J. Needell, D. Rau, I. Dors, C. T. Russell, G. Le, W. Magnes, R. J. Strangeway, K. R. Brom...

    work page 2017

  21. [21]

    L. Z. Hadid, F. Sahraoui, K. H. Kiyani, A. Retin` o, R. Modolo, P. Canu, A. Masters, and M. K. Dougherty, Nature of the mhd and kinetic scale turbulence in the magnetosheath of saturn: Cassini observations, Astrophysical Journal Letters 813, 10.1088/2041-8205/813/2/L29 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/813/2/l29 2041

  22. [22]

    L. Z. Hadid, F. Sahraoui, S. Galtier, and S. Y. Huang, Compressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in the earth’s mag- netosheath: Estimation of the energy cascade rate using in situ spacecraft data, Physical Review Letters120, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.120.055102 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2018

  23. [23]

    R. E. Ergun, K. A. Goodrich, F. D. Wilder, N. Ahmadi, J. C. Holmes, S. Eriksson, J. E. Stawarz, R. Nakamura, K. J. Genestreti, M. Hesse, J. L. Burch, R. B. Torbert, T. D. Phan, S. J. Schwartz, J. P. Eastwood, R. J. Strangeway, O. L. Contel, C. T. Russell, M. R. Argall, P. A. Lindqvist, L. J. Chen, P. A. Cassak, B. L. Giles, J. C. Dorelli, D. Gershman, T. ...

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    J. E. Stawarz, J. P. Eastwood, T. D. Phan, I. L. Gingell, M. A. Shay, J. L. Burch, R. E. Ergun, B. L. Giles, D. J. Gershman, O. L. Contel, P.-A. Lindqvist, C. T. Russell, R. J. Strangeway, R. B. Torbert, M. R. Argall, D. Fischer, W. Magnes, and L. Franci, Properties of the turbulence associated with electron-only magnetic reconnection in earth’s magnetosh...

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    S. Lu, R. Wang, Q. Lu, V. Angelopoulos, R. Nakamura, A. V. Artemyev, P. L. Pritchett, T. Z. Liu, X. J. Zhang, W. Baumjohann, W. Gonzalez, A. C. Rager, R. B. Torbert, B. L. Giles, D. J. Gershman, C. T. Russell, R. J. Strangeway, Y. Qi, R. E. Ergun, P. A. Lindqvist, J. L. Burch, and S. Wang, Magnetotail reconnection onset caused by electron kinetics with a ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18787-w 2020

  26. [26]

    H. Ji, W. Daughton, J. Jara-Almonte, A. Le, A. Stanier, and J. Yoo, Magnetic reconnection in the era of exascale computing and multiscale experiments (2022)

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    R. Wang, S. Wang, Q. Lu, X. Li, S. Lu, and W. Gonzalez, Direct observation of turbulent magnetic reconnection in the solar wind, Nature Astronomy7, 18 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    J. M. Webster, J. L. Burch, P. H. Reiff, A. G. Daou, K. J. Genestreti, D. B. Graham, R. B. Torbert, R. E. Ergun, S. Y. Sazykin, A. Marshall, R. C. Allen, L. J. Chen, S. Wang, T. D. Phan, B. L. Giles, T. E. Moore, S. A. Fuselier, G. Cozzani, C. T. Russell, S. Eriksson, A. C. Rager, J. M. Broll, K. Goodrich, and F. Wilder, Magnetospheric multiscale dayside ...

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    X. Yan, Z. Xue, C. Jiang, E. R. Priest, B. Kliem, L. Yang, J. Wang, D. Kong, Y. Song, X. Feng, and Z. Liu, Fast plasmoid-mediated reconnection in a solar flare, Nature Communications13, 10.1038/s41467-022-28269-w (2022)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28269-w 2022

  30. [30]

    R. B. Torbert, J. L. Burch, T. D. Phan, M. Hesse, M. R. Argall, J. Shuster, R. E. Ergun, L. Alm, R. Nakamura, K. J. Genestreti, D. J. Gershman, W. R. Paterson, D. L. Turner, I. Cohen, B. L. Giles, C. J. Pollock, S. Wang, L.-J. Chen, J. E. Stawarz, J. P. Eastwood, K. J. Hwang, C. Farrugia, I. Dors, H. Vaith, C. Mouikis, A. Ardakani, B. H. Mauk, S. A. Fusel...

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Eriksson, F

    S. Eriksson, F. D. Wilder, R. E. Ergun, S. J. Schwartz, P. A. Cassak, J. L. Burch, L. J. Chen, R. B. Torbert, T. D. Phan, B. Lavraud, K. A. Goodrich, J. C. Holmes, J. E. Stawarz, A. P. Sturner, D. M. Malaspina, M. E. Usanova, K. J. Trattner, R. J. Strangeway, C. T. Russell, C. J. Pollock, B. L. Giles, M. Hesse, P. A. Lindqvist, J. F. Drake, M. A. Shay, 11...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.015001 2016

  32. [32]

    E. G. Zweibel and M. Yamada, Perspectives on magnetic reconnection, inProceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Vol. 472 (Royal Society, 2016)

    work page 2016

  33. [33]

    Gronoff, P

    G. Gronoff, P. Arras, S. Baraka, J. M. Bell, G. Cessateur, O. Cohen, S. M. Curry, J. J. Drake, M. Elrod, J. Erwin, K. Garcia-Sage, C. Garraffo, A. Glocer, N. G. Heavens, K. Lovato, R. Maggiolo, C. D. Parkinson, C. S. Wedlund, D. R. Weimer, and W. B. Moore, Atmospheric escape processes and planetary atmospheric evolution, Journal of Geophysical Research: S...

    work page doi:10.1029/2019ja027639 2020

  34. [34]

    D. A. Brain, F. Bagenal, Y. J. Ma, H. Nilsson, and G. S. Wieser, Atmospheric escape from unmagnetized bodies (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Rigby, F

    A. Rigby, F. Cruz, B. Albertazzi, R. Bamford, A. R. Bell, J. E. Cross, F. Fraschetti, P. Graham, Y. Hara, P. M. Kozlowski, Y. Kuramitsu, D. Q. Lamb, S. Lebedev, J. R. Marques, F. Miniati, T. Morita, M. Oliver, B. Reville, Y. Sakawa, S. Sarkar, C. Spindloe, R. Trines, P. Tzeferacos, L. O. Silva, R. Bingham, M. Koenig, and G. Gregori, Electron acceleration ...

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    S. K. Mattoo, S. K. Singh, L. M. Awasthi, R. Singh, and P. K. Kaw, Experimental observation of electron-temperature- gradient turbulence in a laboratory plasma, Physical Review Letters108, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.255007 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.255007 2012

  37. [37]

    J. P. Freidberg,Ideal magnetohydrodynamics(Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1987)

    work page 1987

  38. [38]

    J. P. Goedbloed, H. Goedbloed, R. Keppens, and S. Poedts,Magnetohydrodynamics: of laboratory and astrophysical plasmas(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

  39. [39]

    J. H. Goedbloed and S. Poedts,Principles of magnetohydrodynamics: with applications to laboratory and astrophysical plasmas(Cambridge university press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  40. [40]

    H. M. Abdelhamid and Z. Yoshida, Nonlinear alfv´ en waves in extended magnetohydrodynamics, Physics of Plasmas23, 10.1063/1.4941596 (2016)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4941596 2016

  41. [41]

    H. M. Abdelhamid and Z. Yoshida, Nonlinear helicons bearing multi-scale structures, Physics of Plasmas24, 10.1063/1.4975184 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4975184 2017

  42. [42]

    Hameiri, A

    E. Hameiri, A. Ishizawa, and A. Ishida, Waves in the hall-magnetohydrodynamics model, Physics of Plasmas12, 1 (2005)

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    N. F. Cramer,The physics of Alfv´ en waves(John Wiley & Sons, 2011)

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Louarn, J

    P. Louarn, J. E. Wahlund, T. Chust, H. D. Feraudy, A. Roux, B. Holback, P. O. Dovner, A. I. Eriksson, and G. Holmgren, Observation of kinetic alfv6n waves by the freja spacecraft (1994)

    work page 1994

  45. [45]

    Roytershteyn, S

    V. Roytershteyn, S. Boldyrev, G. L. Delzanno, C. H. Chen, D. Groˇ selj, and N. F. Loureiro, Numerical study of inertial kinetic-alfv´ en turbulence, The Astrophysical Journal870, 103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [46]

    Yoshida, Nonlinear alfv´ en/beltrami waves-an integrable structure built around the casimir, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation17, 2223 (2012)

    Z. Yoshida, Nonlinear alfv´ en/beltrami waves-an integrable structure built around the casimir, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation17, 2223 (2012)

    work page 2012

  47. [47]

    Kawazura, Modification of magnetohydrodynamic waves by the relativistic hall effect, Physical Review E96, 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.013207 (2017)

    Y. Kawazura, Modification of magnetohydrodynamic waves by the relativistic hall effect, Physical Review E96, 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.013207 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.96.013207 2017

  48. [48]

    I. B. Bernstein, Geometric optics in space- and time-varying plasmas, Physics of Fluids18, 320 (1975)

    work page 1975

  49. [49]

    Y. A. Kravtsov and Y. I. Orlov,Geometrical Optics of Inhomogeneous Media, 1st ed., Springer Series on Wave Phenomena (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1990) pp. XIII, 312, published: 30 December 2011

    work page 1990

  50. [50]

    G. B. Whitham,Linear and Nonlinear Waves(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1999) Chap. 7, pp. 209–262

    work page 1999

  51. [51]

    D. G. Swanson,Plasma waves(CRC Press, 2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    S. M. Mahajan and V. Krishan, Exact solution of the incompressible hall magnetohydrodynamics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters359, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00028.x (2005)

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2005.00028.x 2005

  53. [53]

    Sahraoui, S

    F. Sahraoui, S. Galtier, and G. Belmont, On waves in incompressible hall magnetohydrodynamics, Journal of Plasma Physics73, 723 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [54]

    Zhao, Dispersion relations and polarizations of low-frequency waves in two-fluid plasmas, Physics of Plasmas22, 10.1063/1.4919257 (2015)

    J. Zhao, Dispersion relations and polarizations of low-frequency waves in two-fluid plasmas, Physics of Plasmas22, 10.1063/1.4919257 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4919257 2015

  55. [55]

    Kakuwa, Dispersion relations for low-frequency waves in a warm, underdense, two-fluid plasma, AIP Advances7, 10.1063/1.5001376 (2017)

    J. Kakuwa, Dispersion relations for low-frequency waves in a warm, underdense, two-fluid plasma, AIP Advances7, 10.1063/1.5001376 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5001376 2017

  56. [56]

    J. D. Jonghe and R. Keppens, A two-fluid analysis of waves in a warm ion-electron plasma, Physics of Plasmas27, 10.1063/5.0029534 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0029534 2020

  57. [57]

    C. R. Choi, M. H. Woo, K. Ryu, D. Y. Lee, and P. H. Yoon, Polarization and properties of low-frequency waves in warm magnetized two-fluid plasma, Physics of Plasmas30, 10.1063/5.0149227 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0149227 2023

  58. [58]

    Franci, E

    L. Franci, E. Papini, A. Micera, G. Lapenta, P. Hellinger, D. D. Sarto, D. Burgess, and S. Landi, Anisotropic electron heating in turbulence-driven magnetic reconnection in the near-sun solar wind, The Astrophysical Journal936, 27 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    M. L. Goossens, I. Arregui, and T. V. Doorsselaere, Mixed properties of mhd waves in non-uniform plasmas, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences6, 10.3389/fspas.2019.00020 (2019)

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00020 2019

  60. [60]

    Kim and K

    S. Kim and K. Kim, Giant overreflection of magnetohydrodynamic waves from inhomogeneous plasmas with nonuniform shear flows, Physics of Fluids34, 127108 (2022), arXiv:2209.08061 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    S. Lu, A. V. Artemyev, V. Angelopoulos, P. L. Pritchett, and A. Runov, Effects of cross-sheet density and temperature inhomogeneities on magnetotail reconnection, Geophysical Research Letters46, 28 (2019)

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    T. J. Okamoto, P. Antolin, B. D. Pontieu, H. Uitenbroek, T. V. Doorsselaere, and T. Yokoyama, Resonant absorption of transverse oscillations and associated heating in a solar prominence. i. observational aspects, Astrophysical Journal809, 10.1088/0004-637X/809/1/71 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/809/1/71 2015

  63. [63]

    D. J. Pascoe, A. N. Wright, and I. D. Moortel, Propagating coupled alfv´ en and kink oscillations in an arbitrary inhomo- geneous corona, Astrophysical Journal731, 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/73 (2011). 12

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/731/1/73 2011

  64. [64]

    Pucci, S

    F. Pucci, S. Servidio, L. Sorriso-Valvo, V. Olshevsky, W. H. Matthaeus, F. Malara, M. V. Goldman, D. L. Newman, and G. Lapenta, Properties of turbulence in the reconnection exhaust: Numerical simulations compared with observations, The Astrophysical Journal841, 60 (2017)

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    S. J. Skirvin, V. Fedun, S. S. Silva, and G. Verth, Ii. the effect of axisymmetric and spatially varying equilibria and flow on mhd wave modes: Cylindrical geometry, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society510, 2689 (2022)

    work page 2022

  66. [66]

    Soler and J

    R. Soler and J. Terradas, Magnetohydrodynamic kink waves in nonuniform solar flux tubes: Phase mixing and energy cascade to small scales, Astrophysical Journal803, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/43 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/803/1/43 2015

  67. [67]

    Tzeferacos, A

    P. Tzeferacos, A. Rigby, A. F. Bott, A. R. Bell, R. Bingham, A. Casner, F. Cattaneo, E. M. Churazov, J. Emig, F. Fiuza, C. B. Forest, J. Foster, C. Graziani, J. Katz, M. Koenig, C. K. Li, J. Meinecke, R. Petrasso, H. S. Park, B. A. Remington, J. S. Ross, D. Ryu, D. Ryutov, T. G. White, B. Reville, F. Miniati, A. A. Schekochihin, D. Q. Lamb, D. H. Froula, ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-02953-2 2018

  68. [68]

    Mahajan and H

    S. Mahajan and H. Miura, Linear superposition of nonlinear waves, Journal of Plasma Physics75, 145 (2009)

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    Magyar, T

    N. Magyar, T. V. Doorsselaere, and M. Goossens, Understanding uniturbulence: Self-cascade of mhd waves in the presence of inhomogeneities, The Astrophysical Journal882, 50 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    T. S. Hahm, P. H. Diamond, S. J. Park, and Y. S. Na, Potential vorticity conservation for plasma turbulence in an inhomogeneous magnetic field: Theory and implications, Physics of Plasmas31, 10.1063/5.0189855 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0189855 2024

  71. [71]

    S. P. Gary,Theory of Space Plasma Microinstabilities(Cambridge university press, 1993)

    work page 1993

  72. [72]

    D. A. Gurnett and A. Bhattacharjee,Introduction to Plasma Physics: With Space, Laboratory and Astrophysical Applica- tions(Cambridge university press, 2017)

    work page 2017