arxiv: 2605.11082 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ✦ hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Dark Matter as a Source for Lepton Flavor Violation

Jeremy Echeverria , Patricio Escalona , Farinaldo Queiroz , David Suarez

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph

keywords dark matterlepton flavor violationrelic densitydirect detectionmuon to electron gammacharged lepton violation

0 comments

The pith

A dark matter fermion can source observable charged lepton flavor violation while satisfying relic density and direct detection constraints.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores whether a dark matter fermion can generate signals in processes like muon decay to electron plus photon or three electrons. It calculates the required relic density and nucleon scattering rate to map out viable parameters. These parameters must keep the dark matter consistent with collider and direct detection limits yet produce positive rates in lepton flavor violation searches. If correct, upcoming experiments could detect flavor violation traces that point back to the dark matter particle's properties.

Core claim

After computing the dark matter relic density and dark matter-nucleon scattering cross section, the authors outline the region of parameter space where one can simultaneously accommodate a dark matter fermion in agreement with existing collider and direct detection bounds, and positive signals in charged lepton violation observables.

What carries the argument

A dark matter fermion with targeted couplings to Standard Model leptons that induce the flavor-violating operators for muon-to-electron transitions.

If this is right

Positive signals at experiments like MEG II or Mu2e could be attributed to this dark matter fermion.
The relic density calculation restricts the coupling strengths that also control the flavor violation rates.
Direct detection cross sections must remain below current limits in the same parameter regions that allow lepton flavor violation.
Collider production of the dark matter fermion must not contradict the flavor-violating decay predictions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This linkage could be tested by searching for correlated deviations in other lepton flavor processes beyond the three highlighted here.
The same coupling structure might allow similar explanations for flavor violation in other sectors if extended to quarks.
If the model holds, precision flavor data could indirectly constrain dark matter properties even without direct detection signals.
Future relic density refinements from cosmology could further narrow the viable lepton flavor violation window.

Load-bearing premise

The dark matter fermion has specific couplings to leptons that produce flavor violation without introducing extra light particles or violating other unchecked precision bounds.

What would settle it

A direct detection experiment or collider search ruling out the entire parameter space that simultaneously yields the correct relic density and a muon-to-electron-gamma rate above the current experimental limit.

read the original abstract

We will witness enormous progress in the experimental sensitivity to charged-lepton-violation processes in the near future. New physics signals of charged lepton violation might be around the corner without conflicting with existing astrophysical and accelerator bounds. In this work, we explore the possibility of having a dark matter particle as a source for $\mu\to e \gamma$, $\mu \to 3e$, and $\mu\to e$ conversion in nuclei. After computing the dark matter relic density and dark matter-nucleon scattering cross section, we outline the region of parameter space where one can simultaneously accommodate a dark matter fermion in agreement with existing collider and direct detection bounds, and positive signals in charged lepton violation observables.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a standard parameter scan for a DM fermion with flavor-violating lepton couplings that satisfies relic density and direct detection while allowing future LFV signals, but the scan likely skips current LFV upper limits.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors consider a dark matter fermion whose couplings to leptons generate operators for muon to electron gamma, muon to three electrons, and muon to electron conversion. They calculate the thermal relic density and the nucleon scattering cross section, then mark out the mass-coupling region where the LFV rates could be large enough for next-generation experiments yet still compatible with collider and direct detection data. That mapping is the concrete result they deliver. The work is competent at stitching together the cosmology and direct detection pieces with the flavor observables in a single effective setup, and the abstract shows they at least checked the usual accelerator bounds. Nothing here is conceptually new; it applies existing fermion DM constructions to LFV rates in the usual effective-operator way. The soft spot is the treatment of existing LFV limits. The abstract says the region avoids conflict with astrophysical and accelerator bounds but does not state that the current MEG, SINDRUM, or conversion limits are imposed as hard cuts during the scan. If those limits are not enforced, the plotted region can contain points already ruled out, which undercuts the claim that the model produces observable LFV without conflict. The coupling choices also look tuned to produce the desired operators without extra light states, yet the paper gives little detail on how those choices survive other precision constraints. This paper is for phenomenologists who build dark matter models with extra flavor interactions. A reader who wants explicit benchmark points or plots linking relic density to LFV rates could find it useful for reference, but it will not shift how the field thinks about either topic. I would send it to referees so they can verify the numerics and insist on explicit inclusion of all current LFV bounds in the final version.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a fermionic dark matter candidate that generates charged lepton flavor violation (CLFV) through couplings to Standard Model leptons, leading to processes such as μ→eγ, μ→3e, and μ-e conversion. After computing the relic density and DM-nucleon scattering cross section, the authors delineate a parameter space region that simultaneously satisfies the observed relic density, evades collider and direct detection bounds, and yields observable CLFV signals without conflicting with existing astrophysical and accelerator constraints.

Significance. If the parameter scan properly enforces all constraints including current CLFV upper limits, the work would provide a concrete example linking dark matter to lepton flavor violation with potential near-term testability. The relic density and scattering calculations follow standard methods, but the viability of the outlined region as a genuine prediction rather than a post-hoc fit depends on the coupling structure and constraint implementation.

major comments (1)

Abstract: The central claim requires a viable region where predicted CLFV rates lie below existing experimental upper limits (MEG, SINDRUM, etc.) yet remain potentially detectable, while satisfying relic density and evading direct-detection/collider bounds. The abstract does not confirm that current LFV limits are imposed as hard cuts in the scan; if omitted, the outlined region risks containing already-excluded points, rendering the 'without conflicting' assertion internally inconsistent.

minor comments (1)

The abstract lacks any reference to the explicit Lagrangian, coupling structure, or mediator details used to generate the flavor-violating operators; including a brief equation or diagram reference would clarify how the DM-lepton interactions avoid additional light states or precision constraints.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper computes relic density and DM-nucleon scattering from the model Lagrangian parameters, then scans the space for regions simultaneously satisfying external benchmarks (observed relic density, collider/direct-detection bounds) and permitting CLFV rates. No equation or step reduces by construction to a fitted input or self-citation; the LFV observables are derived quantities checked against independent experimental limits rather than imposed as inputs. The approach is a standard consistency scan against external data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on an assumed dark matter fermion with unspecified couplings to leptons that generate flavor violation while preserving the correct relic density; no independent evidence is given for the existence of such couplings beyond the model construction itself.

free parameters (2)

DM-lepton coupling strengths
Chosen to produce observable CLFV rates while satisfying relic density and direct detection bounds.
DM mass
Scanned to find viable regions consistent with all constraints.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard thermal freeze-out calculation for relic density applies without additional entropy production or non-standard cosmology.
Invoked when computing the dark matter relic density from the abstract.

invented entities (1)

Dark matter fermion with flavor-violating couplings no independent evidence
purpose: To source both the observed dark matter density and charged lepton flavor violation signals.
Postulated to connect the two phenomena; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the model is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5414 in / 1367 out tokens · 49729 ms · 2026-05-13T02:50:55.792227+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

After computing the dark matter relic density and dark matter-nucleon scattering cross section, we outline the region of parameter space where one can simultaneously accommodate a dark matter fermion...
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The decay width for μ→eγ in this model is Γ(μ→eγ) = ... F2(x) ...

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

P. F. de Salas, D. V. Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart´ ınez-Mirav´ e, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. T´ ortola, and J. W. F. Valle,2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,JHEP02(2021) 071, [2006.11237]

work page arXiv 2020
[2]

Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision,

F. Capozzi, W. Giar` e, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo,Neutrino masses and mixing: Entering the era of subpercent precision,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 9 093006, [2503.07752]

work page arXiv 2025
[3]

NuFit-6.0: Updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations

I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, I. Martinez-Soler, J. P. Pinheiro, and T. Schwetz,NuFit-6.0: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations, JHEP12(2024) 216, [2410.05380]. [4]Particle Data GroupCollaboration, S. Navaset. al.,Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110(2024), no. 3 030001

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024
[4]

V. C. Rubin, J. Ford, W. K., and N. Thonnard,Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc).,apj238(June, 1980) 471–487. [6]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanimet. al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astr...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1980
[5]

Arcadi, D

G. Arcadi, D. Cabo-Almeida, M. Dutra, P. Ghosh, M. Lindner, Y. Mambrini, J. P. Neto, M. Pierre, S. Profumo, and F. S. Queiroz,The Waning of the WIMP: Endgame?,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025), no. 2 152, [2403.15860]

work page arXiv 2025
[6]

A History of Dark Matter

G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Rev. Mod. Phys.90(2018), no. 4 045002, [1605.04909]. – 22 –

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[7]

How Dark Matter Came to Matter

J. de Swart, G. Bertone, and J. van Dongen,How Dark Matter Came to Matter, Nature Astron.1(2017) 0059, [1703.00013]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[8]

M. W. Goodman and E. Witten,Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates, Phys. Rev. D31(1985) 3059

work page 1985
[9]

A. K. Drukier, K. Freese, and D. N. Spergel,Detecting Cold Dark Matter Candidates, Phys. Rev. D33(1986) 3495–3508

work page 1986
[10]

J. Fan, M. Reece, and L.-T. Wang,Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection,JCAP11(2010) 042, [1008.1591]. [13]H.E.S.S.Collaboration, H. Abdallaet. al.,Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022), no. 11 111101, [2207.10471]

work page arXiv 2010
[11]

Angel, D

L. Angel, D. Borah, J. P. Neto, F. S. Queiroz, and V. de Souza,Constraining Effective Field Theories for dark matter candidates annihilating into gamma-ray lines with CTAO,2509.08050

work page arXiv
[12]

Angel, G

L. Angel, G. Gambini, L. Guedes, F. S. Queiroz, and V. de Souza,Constraining gamma-ray lines from dark matter annihilation using Fermi-LAT and H.E.S.S. data, JCAP04(2024) 028, [2311.17827]. [16]CMSCollaboration, A. Hayrapetyanet. al.,Dark sector searches with the CMS experiment,Phys. Rept.1115(2025) 448–569, [2405.13778]

work page arXiv 2024
[13]

Giagu,WIMP Dark Matter Searches With the ATLAS Detector at the LHC,Front

S. Giagu,WIMP Dark Matter Searches With the ATLAS Detector at the LHC,Front. in Phys.7(2019) 75

work page 2019
[14]

DiFranzo, K

A. DiFranzo, K. I. Nagao, A. Rajaraman, and T. M. P. Tait,Simplified Models for Dark Matter Interacting with Quarks,JHEP11(2013) 014, [1308.2679]. [Erratum: JHEP 01, 162 (2014)]

work page arXiv 2013
[15]

Berlin, D

A. Berlin, D. Hooper, and S. D. McDermott,Simplified Dark Matter Models for the Galactic Center Gamma-Ray Excess,Phys. Rev. D89(2014), no. 11 115022, [1404.0022]

work page arXiv 2014
[16]

S. Baek, P. Ko, M. Park, W.-I. Park, and C. Yu,Beyond the dark matter effective field theory and a simplified model approach at colliders,Physics Letters B756(2016) 289–294

work page 2016
[17]

N. F. Bell, Y. Cai, and R. K. Leane,Impact of mass generation for spin-1 mediator simplified models,JCAP01(2017) 039, [1610.03063]

work page arXiv 2017
[18]

El Hedri, A

S. El Hedri, A. Kaminska, M. de Vries, and J. Zurita,Simplified Phenomenology for Colored Dark Sectors,JHEP04(2017) 118, [1703.00452]

work page arXiv 2017
[19]

Jacques and K

T. Jacques and K. Nordstr¨ om,Mapping monojet constraints onto Simplified Dark Matter Models,JHEP06(2015) 142, [1502.05721]

work page arXiv 2015
[20]

Xiang, X.-J

Q.-F. Xiang, X.-J. Bi, P.-F. Yin, and Z.-H. Yu,Searches for dark matter signals in simplified models at future hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D91(May, 2015) 095020

work page 2015
[21]

Backovi´ c, M

M. Backovi´ c, M. Kr¨ amer, F. Maltoni, A. Martini, K. Mawatari, and M. Pellen, Higher-order QCD predictions for dark matter production at the LHC in simplified models with s-channel mediators,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 10 482, [1508.05327]. – 23 –

work page arXiv 2015
[22]

N. F. Bell, Y. Cai, and R. K. Leane,Mono-w dark matter signals at the lhc: simplified model analysis,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2016(jan, 2016) 051

work page 2016
[23]

A. J. Brennan, M. F. McDonald, J. Gramling, and T. D. Jacques,Collide and Conquer: Constraints on Simplified Dark Matter Models using Mono-X Collider Searches,JHEP05(2016) 112, [1603.01366]

work page arXiv 2016
[24]

Griest and M

K. Griest and M. Kamionkowski,Supersymmetric dark matter,Phys. Rept.333(2000) 167–182

work page 2000
[25]

E. J. Chun, S. Jung, and J.-C. Park,Very Degenerate Higgsino Dark Matter,JHEP01 (2017) 009, [1607.04288]

work page arXiv 2017
[26]

J. R. Ellis, J. S. Hagelin, S. Kelley, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive,FLIPPED DARK MATTER,Phys. Lett. B209(1988) 283–288

work page 1988
[27]

Kadastik, K

M. Kadastik, K. Kannike, and M. Raidal,Dark Matter as the signal of Grand Unification,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 085020, [0907.1894]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 81, 029903 (2010)]

work page arXiv 2009
[28]

Arbelaez, R

C. Arbelaez, R. Longas, D. Restrepo, and O. Zapata,Fermion dark matter from SO(10) GUTs,Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 1 013012, [1509.06313]

work page arXiv 2016
[29]

Longas, A

R. Longas, A. Rivera, D. Suarez, and C. Ruiz,Singlet–doublet Dirac fermion dark matter from Peccei–Quinn symmetry,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024), no. 25 2450099, [2309.15052]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Restrepo and D

D. Restrepo and D. Suarez,Effective Dirac Neutrino Mass Operator in the Standard Model With a Local Abelian Extension,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 838531, [2112.09524]

work page arXiv 2022
[31]

Agudelo, D

K. Agudelo, D. Restrepo, A. Rivera, and D. Suarez,Multicomponent secluded WIMP dark matter and Dirac neutrino masses with an extra Abelian gauge symmetry,Phys. Rev. D111(2025), no. 9 095018, [2412.02027]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Abada, M

A. Abada, M. E. Krauss, W. Porod, F. Staub, A. Vicente, and C. Weiland,Lepton flavor violation in low-scale seesaw models: SUSY and non-SUSY contributions,JHEP 11(2014) 048, [1408.0138]

work page arXiv 2014
[33]

Lepton Flavor Violation in the Scotogenic Model

T. Toma and A. Vicente,Lepton Flavor Violation in the Scotogenic Model,JHEP01 (2014) 160, [1312.2840]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[34]

Lindner, M

M. Lindner, M. Platscher, and F. S. Queiroz,A Call for New Physics : The Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and Lepton Flavor Violation,Phys. Rept.731(2018) 1–82, [1610.06587]

work page arXiv 2018
[35]

J. K. Mizukoshi, C. A. de S. Pires, F. S. Queiroz, and P. S. Rodrigues da Silva, WIMPs in a 3-3-1 model with heavy Sterile neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 065024, [1010.4097]

work page arXiv 2011
[36]

H. N. Long,The 331 model with right handed neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 437–445, [hep-ph/9504274]

work page arXiv 1996
[37]

H. N. Long,SU(3)-L x U(1)-N model for right-handed neutrino neutral currents,Phys. Rev. D54(1996) 4691–4693, [hep-ph/9607439]. – 24 –

work page arXiv 1996
[38]

Arcadi, C

G. Arcadi, C. P. Ferreira, F. Goertz, M. M. Guzzo, F. S. Queiroz, and A. C. O. Santos,Lepton Flavor Violation Induced by Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D97(2018), no. 7 075022, [1712.02373]

work page arXiv 2018
[39]

Feruglio,Pieces of the Flavour Puzzle,Eur

F. Feruglio,Pieces of the Flavour Puzzle,Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015), no. 8 373, [1503.04071]

work page arXiv 2015
[40]

P. P. Novichkov, J. T. Penedo, and S. T. Petcov,Fermion mass hierarchies, large lepton mixing and residual modular symmetries,JHEP04(2021) 206, [2102.07488]

work page arXiv 2021
[41]

Pisano,A Simple solution for the flavor question,Mod

F. Pisano,A Simple solution for the flavor question,Mod. Phys. Lett. A11(1996) 2639–2647, [hep-ph/9609358]

work page arXiv 1996
[42]

A. G. Dias, R. Martinez, and V. Pleitez,Concerning the Landau pole in 3-3-1 models, Eur. Phys. J. C39(2005) 101–107, [hep-ph/0407141]

work page arXiv 2005
[43]

A. G. Dias,Evading the few TeV perturbative limit in 3-3-1 models,Phys. Rev. D71 (2005) 015009, [hep-ph/0412163]

work page arXiv 2005
[44]

Aguilar, J

M. Aguilar, J. C. Helo, T. Ota, F. S. Queiroz, D. Suarez, and A. Rodr´ ıguez,Type I + II Seesaw Model in light of the New Neutrino Oscillation Measurements,2509.23508

work page arXiv
[45]

Escalona, J

P. Escalona, J. P. Pinheiro, A. Doff, and C. A. de S. Pires,Meson mixing bounds on Z ′ mass in the alignment limit: establishing the phenomenological viability of the 331 model,JHEP07(2025) 105, [2503.14653]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Oliveira, P

V. Oliveira, P. Escalona, L. Angel, C. A. de S. Pires, and F. S. Queiroz,Type-II seesaw mechanism for Dirac neutrinos and its implications on N ef f and lepton flavor violation in a 3-3-1 model,JHEP07(2025) 197, [2502.01760]

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

Escalona, J

P. Escalona, J. P. Pinheiro, V. Oliveira, A. Doff, and C. A. De Sousa Pires,Three Decades of FCNC Studies in 3-3-1 Model with Right-Handed Neutrinos: From Z’-Dominance to the Alignment Limit,Universe11(2025), no. 12 396, [2510.17979]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Doff and C

A. Doff and C. A. d. S. Pires,Scalar contributions to the S, T, U parameters in a 3-3-1 model,2603.08980

work page arXiv
[49]

Kannike, N

K. Kannike, N. Koivunen, and A. Kubarski,Is our vacuum global in a 331 model with three triplets?,JHEP01(2026) 115, [2509.18250]

work page arXiv 2026
[50]

Nevzorov,Smallness of neutrino masses and leptogenesis in 331 composite Higgs model,Phys

R. Nevzorov,Smallness of neutrino masses and leptogenesis in 331 composite Higgs model,Phys. Lett. B874(2026) 140210, [2509.13245]

work page arXiv 2026
[51]

Rehman, M

M. Rehman, M. A. Iqbal, M. E. Gomez, and O. Panella,Radiative corrections to the S, T, U parameters and their impact on the W boson mass in the 331 model,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 5 055029, [2507.18527]. [56]LZCollaboration, J. Aalberset. al.,Dark Matter Search Results from 4.2 Tonne-Years of Exposure of the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett. 13...

work page arXiv 2025
[52]

J. G. Ferreira, Jr, P. R. D. Pinheiro, C. A. d. S. Pires, and P. S. R. da Silva,The Minimal 3-3-1 model with only two Higgs triplets,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 095019, [1109.0031]

work page arXiv 2011
[53]

V. Q. Phong, V. T. Van, and H. N. Long,Electroweak phase transition in the reduced minimal 3-3-1 model,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 096009, [1309.0355]. [69]CT A ConsortiumCollaboration, B. S. Acharyaet. al.,Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array. WSP, 11, 2018

work page arXiv 2013
[54]

Profumo and F

S. Profumo and F. S. Queiroz,Constraining theZ ′ mass in 331 models using direct dark matter detection,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014), no. 7 2960, [1307.7802]

work page arXiv 2014
[55]

G. B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo, A. Soldatenko, and C. E. Yaguna,Direct detection of neutralino dark mattter in non-standard cosmologies,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 015010, [hep-ph/0610379]

work page arXiv 2007
[56]

G. B. Gelmini and P. Gondolo,Neutralino with the right cold dark matter abundance in (almost) any supersymmetric model,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 023510, [hep-ph/0602230]

work page arXiv 2006
[57]

Arcadi and P

G. Arcadi and P. Ullio,Accurate estimate of the relic density and the kinetic decoupling in non-thermal dark matter models,Phys. Rev. D84(2011) 043520, [1104.3591]

work page arXiv 2011
[58]

Baer, K.-Y

H. Baer, K.-Y. Choi, J. E. Kim, and L. Roszkowski,Dark matter production in the early Universe: beyond the thermal WIMP paradigm,Phys. Rept.555(2015) 1–60, [1407.0017]. – 26 –

work page arXiv 2015
[59]

Belanger, F

G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov,MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM,Comput. Phys. Commun.149(2002) 103–120, [hep-ph/0112278]

work page arXiv 2002
[60]

micrOMEGAs2.0: a program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model

G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov,MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model,Comput. Phys. Commun.176(2007) 367–382, [hep-ph/0607059]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[61]

Belanger, F

G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, P. Brun, A. Pukhov, S. Rosier-Lees, P. Salati, and A. Semenov,Indirect search for dark matter with micrOMEGAs2.4,Comput. Phys. Commun.182(2011) 842–856, [1004.1092]

work page arXiv 2011
[62]

micrOMEGAs3.1 : a program for calculating dark matter observables

G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov,micrOMEGAs 3: A program for calculating dark matter observables,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 960–985, [1305.0237]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[63]

B´ elanger, F

G. B´ elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov,micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates,Comput. Phys. Commun.192(2015) 322–329, [1407.6129]

work page arXiv 2015
[64]

CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model

A. Belyaev, N. D. Christensen, and A. Pukhov,CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model,Comput. Phys. Commun.184(2013) 1729–1769, [1207.6082]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[65]

Alguero, G

G. Alguero, G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, S. Chakraborti, A. Goudelis, S. Kraml, A. Mjallal, and A. Pukhov,micrOMEGAs 6.0: N-component dark matter,Comput. Phys. Commun.299(2024) 109133, [2312.14894]

work page arXiv 2024
[66]

Arcadi, M

G. Arcadi, M. Lindner, F. S. Queiroz, W. Rodejohann, and S. Vogl,Pseudoscalar Mediators: A WIMP model at the Neutrino Floor,JCAP03(2018) 042, [1711.02110]

work page arXiv 2018
[67]

Lychkovskiy, S

O. Lychkovskiy, S. Blinnikov, and M. Vysotsky,TeV-scale bileptons, see-saw type II and lepton flavor violation in core-collapse supernova,Eur. Phys. J. C67(2010) 213–227, [0912.1395]

work page arXiv 2010
[68]

D. N. Dinh, A. Ibarra, E. Molinaro, and S. T. Petcov,Theµ−eConversion in Nuclei, µ→eγ, µ→3eDecays and TeV Scale See-Saw Scenarios of Neutrino Mass Generation,JHEP08(2012) 125, [1205.4671]. [Erratum: JHEP 09, 023 (2013)]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[69]

He, C.-J

X.-G. He, C.-J. Lee, J. Tandean, and Y.-J. Zheng,Seesaw Models with Minimal Flavor Violation,Phys. Rev. D91(2015), no. 7 076008, [1411.6612]

work page arXiv 2015
[70]

Lavoura,General formulae for f(1) —>f(2) gamma,Eur

L. Lavoura,General formulae for f(1) —>f(2) gamma,Eur. Phys. J. C29(2003) 191–195, [hep-ph/0302221]

work page arXiv 2003
[71]

Arganda, M

E. Arganda, M. J. Herrero, and A. M. Teixeira,mu-e conversion in nuclei within the CMSSM seesaw: Universality versus non-universality,JHEP10(2007) 104, [0707.2955]

work page arXiv 2007
[72]

Y. A. Coutinho, V. Salustino Guimar˜ aes, and A. A. Nepomuceno,Bounds on Z’ from 3-3-1 model at the LHC energies,Phys. Rev. D87(2013), no. 11 115014, [1304.7907]

work page arXiv 2013
[73]

Alves, L

A. Alves, L. Duarte, S. Kovalenko, Y. M. Oviedo-Torres, F. S. Queiroz, and Y. S. Villamizar,Constraining 3-3-1 models at the LHC and future hadron colliders,Phys. Rev. D106(2022), no. 5 055027, [2203.02520]

work page arXiv 2022
[74]

Salazar, R

C. Salazar, R. H. Benavides, W. A. Ponce, and E. Rojas,LHC Constraints on 3-3-1 Models,JHEP07(2015) 096, [1503.03519]. – 27 –

work page arXiv 2015
[75]

Lindner, F

M. Lindner, F. S. Queiroz, and W. Rodejohann,Dilepton bounds on left–right symmetry at the LHC run II and neutrinoless double beta decay,Phys. Lett. B762 (2016) 190–195, [1604.07419]

work page arXiv 2016
[76]

A. S. De Jesus, S. Kovalenko, F. S. Queiroz, C. Siqueira, and K. Sinha,Vectorlike leptons and inert scalar triplet: Lepton flavor violation,g−2, and collider searches, Phys. Rev. D102(2020), no. 3 035004, [2004.01200]

work page arXiv 2020
[77]

A. S. de Jesus, S. Kovalenko, T. B. de Melo, J. P. Neto, Y. M. Oviedo-Torres, F. S. Queiroz, Y. S. Villamizar, and A. R. Zerwekh,On the role of LHC and HL-LHC in constraining flavor changing neutral currents,Phys. Lett. B849(2024) 138419, [2304.00041]

work page arXiv 2024
[78]

´A. S. de Jesus, F. S. Queiroz, J. W. F. Valle, and Y. Villamizar,Vector-Like Fermions and Inert Scalar Solutions to the Muon g-2 Anomaly and collider probes at the HL-LHC and FCC-hh,2312.03851

work page arXiv
[79]

Schumann, L

M. Schumann, L. Baudis, L. B¨ utikofer, A. Kish, and M. Selvi,Dark matter sensitivity of multi-ton liquid xenon detectors,JCAP10(2015) 016, [1506.08309]

work page arXiv 2015
[80]

Billardet al., Rept

J. Billardet. al.,Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*,Rept. Prog. Phys.85(2022), no. 5 056201, [2104.07634]. – 28 –

work page arXiv 2022