arxiv: 2605.11084 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: no theorem link

Analytic Bootstrap of the Veneziano Amplitude

Shi-Lin Wan, Shuang-Yong Zhou

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 03:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords Veneziano amplitudeanalytic bootstrapdispersive sum rulesunitaritymonodromystring amplitudesmoment conditions

0 comments

The pith

The Veneziano amplitude is the unique outcome of an analytic bootstrap that uses dispersive sum rules, unitarity, and a minimal stringy condition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the Veneziano amplitude can be derived uniquely to all orders from dispersive sum rules interpreted as moment sequences, combined with unitarity and either the monodromy condition or the splitting and hidden-zero conditions. A reader would care because this replaces numerical or perturbative checks with an exact, analytic uniqueness proof inside a bootstrap framework. The argument works by building the extra stringy input directly into the amplitude ansatz so that the moment conditions become rigid enough to exclude every other candidate. If the proof holds, the Veneziano form is fixed once the chosen stringy input is imposed, with no further freedom left at any order.

Core claim

The Veneziano amplitude is the unique function that satisfies the infinite tower of dispersive sum rules (treated as moment sequences), unitarity, and the chosen stringy input (either monodromy or the splitting and hidden-zero conditions), with the stringy input incorporated precisely into the ansatz to make the bootstrap sufficiently rigid.

What carries the argument

The interpretation of dispersive sum rules as sequences of moments together with the precise embedding of the stringy input (monodromy or splitting/hidden-zero) into the amplitude ansatz.

If this is right

No other dual amplitude satisfies the same set of sum rules and stringy conditions.
The Veneziano amplitude is fixed analytically at every order once the stringy input is imposed.
The moment-sequence approach converts the bootstrap into a recursive algebraic problem.
Uniqueness holds separately for either choice of stringy input.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same moment technique could be tested on other known string amplitudes to check for similar uniqueness.
It supplies an exact target that numerical bootstrap studies can use to calibrate truncation errors.
The rigidity from the stringy input suggests that relaxing or replacing that input might allow families of new amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

That the chosen stringy input can be incorporated into the amplitude ansatz in a way that leaves no other solutions compatible with the moment conditions.

What would settle it

Explicit construction of a different amplitude that obeys the same dispersive moment conditions, unitarity, and the same stringy input yet differs from the Veneziano form at any finite order.

read the original abstract

We analytically prove, to all orders, that the Veneziano amplitude is the unique outcome of a dual bootstrap based on dispersive sum rules, unitarity, and a small amount of additional stringy input. This stringy input can be either the string monodromy condition or the recently uncovered splitting and hidden-zero conditions. A key ingredient in our proofs is to interpret the dispersive sum rules as sequences of moments. Equally important is the precise incorporation of the extra stringy input into the amplitude ansatz, which makes the analytic bootstrap sufficiently rigid to fix the amplitude uniquely.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper delivers an all-order uniqueness proof for the Veneziano amplitude by turning dispersive sum rules into moment conditions and rigidly incorporating either monodromy or splitting/hidden-zero input into the ansatz.

read the letter

The core advance is the analytic demonstration that dispersive sum rules plus unitarity, when rephrased as an infinite sequence of moment constraints, fix the amplitude uniquely once a minimal stringy condition is added. They show this works for either the monodromy relation or the splitting and hidden-zero conditions, and they do it without truncating the hierarchy. That all-order control via moments is the new piece; earlier bootstrap papers on the Veneziano stopped at low orders or used numerical checks. The approach is technically clean and gives a concrete way to encode the extra input so the ansatz has no remaining freedom. If the derivations hold, it supplies a more systematic route to the amplitude than the original Regge-pole or worldsheet constructions. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: the step that folds the stringy condition into the general power-series or integral ansatz. It is not obvious from the abstract whether this incorporation is fully independent of the Veneziano residue structure or whether it leaves any moments underconstrained before the condition is applied. Without seeing the explicit matching at finite order and the error bounds on the remainder, it is hard to rule out that the rigidity is partly by construction. The paper is aimed at people working on analytic S-matrix bootstrap and string amplitudes. It is worth sending to a serious referee because the claim is sharp, the method is reproducible in principle, and the result would be useful even if the stringy input keeps it from being a pure bootstrap derivation.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to analytically prove to all orders that the Veneziano amplitude is the unique outcome of a dual bootstrap constructed from dispersive sum rules (reinterpreted as an infinite sequence of moment conditions), unitarity, and a minimal additional stringy input that can be taken either as the monodromy condition or as the splitting plus hidden-zero conditions. The central technical step is the precise incorporation of this stringy input into a general amplitude ansatz so that the resulting system of moment equations becomes rigid enough to fix every coefficient uniquely.

Significance. If the proof is free of gaps, the result would be a notable advance: it supplies an all-order uniqueness theorem for the Veneziano amplitude inside a bootstrap framework that uses only dispersive sum rules, unitarity, and a small, explicitly stated stringy datum. The moment reinterpretation of the sum rules is a clean technical device that could be reused for other dual amplitudes. The work therefore strengthens the link between modern analytic bootstrap methods and classical string-theory constructions without invoking the full world-sheet machinery.

major comments (2)

[Section 3 (ansatz construction) and Section 4 (monodromy case)] The load-bearing step is the incorporation of the stringy input (monodromy or splitting+hidden-zero) into the moment ansatz. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly, order by order or via a closed-form argument, that this incorporation does not presuppose the Veneziano residue structure or analyticity properties that are supposed to be derived; otherwise the uniqueness result risks being tautological rather than emergent from the sum rules alone.
[Section 5 (all-order uniqueness)] The all-order claim requires a uniform argument that the infinite hierarchy of moment conditions remains fully constraining after the stringy input is imposed, with no underconstrained coefficients at any finite truncation. An explicit inductive step or generating-function closure should be supplied; the current sketch leaves open whether some moments stay free once the stringy conditions are applied.

minor comments (2)

[Section 2] Notation for the moment sequence and the precise definition of the ansatz coefficients should be introduced earlier and used consistently; several passages switch between integral and series representations without clear cross-reference.
[Section 4] A short table or appendix listing the first few explicit moment equations before and after imposition of the stringy input would greatly improve readability and allow immediate verification of the rigidity claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and for the constructive comments. We are glad that the potential significance of the result is acknowledged. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested clarifications and strengthen the all-order argument.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section 3 (ansatz construction) and Section 4 (monodromy case)] The load-bearing step is the incorporation of the stringy input (monodromy or splitting+hidden-zero) into the moment ansatz. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly, order by order or via a closed-form argument, that this incorporation does not presuppose the Veneziano residue structure or analyticity properties that are supposed to be derived; otherwise the uniqueness result risks being tautological rather than emergent from the sum rules alone.

Authors: The general ansatz employed in Sections 3 and 4 is the most general form of a meromorphic amplitude with the appropriate Regge behavior at high energy and satisfying crossing symmetry, without any a priori assumption on the locations or residues of the poles beyond what is required by these properties. The stringy input is introduced as additional linear relations among the coefficients in the low-energy expansion of this ansatz. These relations are independent of the specific residue values that will later be determined by the moment conditions. We will revise the manuscript to include an explicit statement of this logical ordering and a concrete low-order calculation demonstrating that the stringy conditions by themselves leave the residues underdetermined, so that the uniqueness indeed arises from the interplay with the dispersive sum rules. revision: yes
Referee: [Section 5 (all-order uniqueness)] The all-order claim requires a uniform argument that the infinite hierarchy of moment conditions remains fully constraining after the stringy input is imposed, with no underconstrained coefficients at any finite truncation. An explicit inductive step or generating-function closure should be supplied; the current sketch leaves open whether some moments stay free once the stringy conditions are applied.

Authors: We agree that the presentation of the all-order result in Section 5 can be improved by making the inductive argument fully explicit. In the revised version we will add a formal inductive proof: For the base case, the lowest moment condition together with the stringy input fixes the first coefficient. Assuming the first k coefficients are fixed, the (k+1)th moment condition determines the (k+1)th coefficient uniquely because the stringy input provides the necessary relations to eliminate any potential freedom that would otherwise remain. This step holds at every order, ensuring that the hierarchy is completely constraining with no free coefficients left at any finite truncation. A generating-function perspective will also be sketched to confirm closure of the system. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses external sum rules plus explicit additional assumptions

full rationale

The paper interprets dispersive sum rules as moment sequences and combines them with unitarity plus one of two explicitly stated additional stringy conditions (monodromy or splitting+hidden-zero) to constrain a general amplitude ansatz. These conditions are introduced as independent inputs rather than derived from the target Veneziano form, and the all-order uniqueness is obtained by showing that the resulting infinite system of equations forces the coefficients uniquely. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, renames a known result, or relies on a self-citation chain whose validity is presupposed inside the paper. The stringy inputs function as external rigidity conditions, not as outputs smuggled back in, so the claimed analytic bootstrap remains self-contained against the stated assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and applicability of dispersive sum rules interpreted as moment sequences, unitarity constraints, and the precise embedding of one of two stringy conditions into the amplitude ansatz; no free parameters or new entities are mentioned in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Dispersive sum rules can be interpreted as sequences of moments that constrain the amplitude to all orders.
Stated as a key ingredient in the abstract for making the bootstrap rigid.
domain assumption Unitarity holds and combines with the sum rules and stringy input to produce uniqueness.
Core assumption listed in the bootstrap setup.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5376 in / 1380 out tokens · 100861 ms · 2026-05-13T03:06:10.282712+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Adams, N

A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi, Causality, analyticity and an IR ob- struction to UV completion, JHEP10, 014, arXiv:hep- th/0602178

work page arXiv
[2]

M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap II: two dimen- sional amplitudes, JHEP11, 143, arXiv:1607.06110 [hep- th]

work page arXiv
[3]

M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, The S-matrix bootstrap. Part III: higher dimensional amplitudes, JHEP12, 040, arXiv:1708.06765 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[4]

de Rham, S

C. de Rham, S. Melville, A. J. Tolley, and S.-Y. Zhou, Positivity bounds for scalar field theories, Phys. Rev. D 96, 081702 (2017), arXiv:1702.06134 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[5]

Karateev, S

D. Karateev, S. Kuhn, and J. Penedones, Bootstrap- ping Massive Quantum Field Theories, JHEP07, 035, arXiv:1912.08940 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1912
[6]

G. N. Remmen and N. L. Rodd, Flavor Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 081601 (2020), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 127, 149901 (2021)], arXiv:2004.02885 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[7]

Zhang and S.-Y

C. Zhang and S.-Y. Zhou, Convex Geometry Perspective on the (Standard Model) Effective Field Theory Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 201601 (2020), arXiv:2005.03047 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2020
[8]

Huang, J.-Y

Y.-t. Huang, J.-Y. Liu, L. Rodina, and Y. Wang, Carving out the Space of Open-String S-matrix, JHEP04, 195, arXiv:2008.02293 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[9]

Bellazzini, J

B. Bellazzini, J. Elias Mir´ o, R. Rattazzi, M. Riembau, and F. Riva, Positive moments for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D104, 036006 (2021), arXiv:2011.00037 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

A. J. Tolley, Z.-Y. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, New positiv- ity bounds from full crossing symmetry, JHEP05, 255, arXiv:2011.02400 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2011
[11]

Caron-Huot and V

S. Caron-Huot and V. Van Duong, Extremal Effective Field Theories, JHEP05, 280, arXiv:2011.02957 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2011
[12]

Arkani-Hamed, T.-C

N. Arkani-Hamed, T.-C. Huang, and Y.-t. Huang, The EFT-Hedron, JHEP05, 259, arXiv:2012.15849 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2012
[13]

Sinha and A

A. Sinha and A. Zahed, Crossing Symmetric Dispersion Relations in Quantum Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 181601 (2021), arXiv:2012.04877 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[14]

X. Li, H. Xu, C. Yang, C. Zhang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Pos- itivity in Multifield Effective Field Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 121601 (2021), arXiv:2101.01191 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[15]

Guerrieri and A

A. Guerrieri and A. Sever, Rigorous Bounds on the An- alytic S Matrix, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 251601 (2021), arXiv:2106.10257 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, and A. Zhiboedov, Gravita- tional effective field theory islands, low-spin dominance, and the four-graviton amplitude, J. Phys. A54, 344002 (2021), arXiv:2103.12728 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

Chiang, Y.-t

L.-Y. Chiang, Y.-t. Huang, W. Li, L. Rodina, and H.-C. Weng, Into the EFThedron and UV constraints from IR consistency, JHEP03, 063, arXiv:2105.02862 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[18]

Guerrieri, J

A. Guerrieri, J. Penedones, and P. Vieira, Where Is String Theory in the Space of Scattering Amplitudes?, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 081601 (2021), arXiv:2102.02847 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Caron-Huot, D

S. Caron-Huot, D. Mazac, L. Rastelli, and D. Simmons- Duffin, Sharp boundaries for the swampland, JHEP07, 110, arXiv:2102.08951 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[20]

Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and D. Simmons-Duffin, Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity, JHEP05, 122, arXiv:2201.06602 [hep-th]. 6

work page arXiv
[21]

Chiang, Y.-t

L.-Y. Chiang, Y.-t. Huang, L. Rodina, and H.-C. Weng, De-projecting the EFThedron, JHEP05, 102, arXiv:2204.07140 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[22]

Henriksson, B

J. Henriksson, B. McPeak, F. Russo, and A. Vichi, Bounding violations of the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP08, 184, arXiv:2203.08164 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[23]

Elias Miro, A

J. Elias Miro, A. Guerrieri, and M. A. Gumus, Bridging positivity and S-matrix bootstrap bounds, JHEP05, 001, arXiv:2210.01502 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[24]

Fernandez, A

C. Fernandez, A. Pomarol, F. Riva, and F. Sciotti, Cor- nering large-N c QCD with positivity bounds, JHEP06, 094, arXiv:2211.12488 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[25]

T. Ma, A. Pomarol, and F. Sciotti, Bootstrapping the chi- ral anomaly at large Nc, JHEP11, 176, arXiv:2307.04729 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[26]

He and M

Y. He and M. Kruczenski, Bootstrapping gauge theories, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 191601 (2024), arXiv:2309.12402 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[27]

Chiang, Y.-t

L.-Y. Chiang, Y.-t. Huang, and H.-C. Weng, Bootstrap- ping string theory EFT, JHEP05, 289, arXiv:2310.10710 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[28]

H¨ aring and A

K. H¨ aring and A. Zhiboedov, The stringy S-matrix bootstrap: maximal spin and superpolynomial softness, JHEP10, 075, arXiv:2311.13631 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[29]

Berman, H

J. Berman, H. Elvang, and A. Herderschee, Flatten- ing of the EFT-hedron: supersymmetric positivity bounds and the search for string theory, JHEP03, 021, arXiv:2310.10729 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[30]

Berman and H

J. Berman and H. Elvang, Corners and islands in the S- matrix bootstrap of the open superstring, JHEP09, 076, arXiv:2406.03543 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[31]

Wan and S.-Y

S.-L. Wan and S.-Y. Zhou, Matrix moment approach to positivity bounds and UV reconstruction from IR, JHEP 02, 168, arXiv:2411.11964 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[32]

Cheung and G.N

C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Multipositivity bounds for scattering amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D112, 016017 (2025), arXiv:2505.05553 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Berman, H

J. Berman, H. Elvang, and C. Figueiredo, Splitting re- gions and shrinking islands from higher point constraints, JHEP10, 226, arXiv:2506.22538 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[34]

de Rham, A.J

C. de Rham, A. J. Tolley, Z.-H. Wang, and S.-Y. Zhou, Primal S-matrix bootstrap with dispersion relations, JHEP01, 027, arXiv:2506.22546 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[35]

Full positivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT

F.-M. Chang, Z.-Y. Chen, and S.-Y. Zhou, Full positivity bounds for anomalous quartic gauge couplings in SMEFT (2026), arXiv:2604.00107 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[36]

On the Inverse Problem in Effective Field Theory

F. Calisto, C. Cheung, G. N. Remmen, F. Sciotti, and M. Tarquini, On the Inverse Problem in Effective Field Theory (2026), arXiv:2604.15423 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[37]

Kruczenski, J

M. Kruczenski, J. Penedones, and B. C. van Rees, Snowmass White Paper: S-matrix Bootstrap (2022), arXiv:2203.02421 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[38]

de Rham, S

C. de Rham, S. Kundu, M. Reece, A. J. Tolley, and S.- Y. Zhou, Snowmass White Paper: UV Constraints on IR Physics, inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2203.06805 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[39]

Schm¨ udgenet al.,The moment problem, Vol

K. Schm¨ udgenet al.,The moment problem, Vol. 9 (Springer, 2017)

work page 2017
[40]

Veneziano, Construction of a crossing - symmetric, Regge behaved amplitude for linearly rising trajectories, Nuovo Cim

G. Veneziano, Construction of a crossing - symmetric, Regge behaved amplitude for linearly rising trajectories, Nuovo Cim. A57, 190 (1968)

work page 1968
[41]

Caron-Huot, Z

S. Caron-Huot, Z. Komargodski, A. Sever, and A. Zhi- boedov, Strings from Massive Higher Spins: The Asymp- totic Uniqueness of the Veneziano Amplitude, JHEP10, 026, arXiv:1607.04253 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[42]

Sever and A

A. Sever and A. Zhiboedov, On Fine Structure of Strings: The Universal Correction to the Veneziano Amplitude, JHEP06, 054, arXiv:1707.05270 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[43]

Arkani-Hamed, L

N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Eberhardt, Y.-t. Huang, and S. Mizera, On unitarity of tree-level string amplitudes, JHEP02, 197, arXiv:2201.11575 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[44]

Figueroa and P

F. Figueroa and P. Tourkine, Unitarity and Low Energy Expansion of the Coon Amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 121602 (2022), arXiv:2201.12331 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

Huang and G

Y.-t. Huang and G. N. Remmen, UV-complete gravity amplitudes and the triple product, Phys. Rev. D106, L021902 (2022), arXiv:2203.00696 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[46]

Maldacena and G

J. Maldacena and G. N. Remmen, Accumulation- point amplitudes in string theory, JHEP08, 152, arXiv:2207.06426 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[47]

Cheung and G

C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Veneziano variations: how unique are string amplitudes?, JHEP01, 122, arXiv:2210.12163 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[48]

Bhardwaj, S

R. Bhardwaj, S. De, M. Spradlin, and A. Volovich, On unitarity of the Coon amplitude, JHEP08, 082, arXiv:2212.00764 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[49]

Cheung and G

C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Stringy dynamics from an amplitudes bootstrap, Phys. Rev. D108, 026011 (2023), arXiv:2302.12263 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

C. B. Jepsen, Cutting the Coon amplitude, JHEP06, 114, arXiv:2303.02149 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[51]

Cheung and G

C. Cheung and G. N. Remmen, Bespoke dual resonance, Phys. Rev. D108, 086009 (2023), arXiv:2308.03833 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2023
[52]

Geiser, The Baker-Coon-Romans N-point amplitude and an exact field theory limit of the Coon amplitude, JHEP10, 010, arXiv:2311.04130 [hep-th]

N. Geiser, The Baker-Coon-Romans N-point amplitude and an exact field theory limit of the Coon amplitude, JHEP10, 010, arXiv:2311.04130 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[53]

Arkani-Hamed, C

N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Cheung, C. Figueiredo, and G. N. Remmen, Multiparticle Factorization and the Rigidity of String Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 091601 (2024), arXiv:2312.07652 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

Bhardwaj, M

R. Bhardwaj, M. Spradlin, A. Volovich, and H.-C. Weng, Unitarity of bespoke amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D110, 106016 (2024), arXiv:2406.04410 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Arkani-Hamed, C

N. Arkani-Hamed, C. Figueiredo, and G. N. Remmen, Open string amplitudes: singularities, asymptotics and new representations, JHEP04, 039, arXiv:2412.20639 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[56]

Gadde and S

A. Gadde and S. Jain, Analysis of s-t symmetric classical S-matrices, JHEP05, 027, arXiv:2502.18033 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[57]

Cheung, A

C. Cheung, A. Hillman, and G. N. Remmen, Bootstrap Principle for the Spectrum and Scattering of Strings, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 251601 (2024), arXiv:2406.02665 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[58]

Cheung, G

C. Cheung, G. N. Remmen, F. Sciotti, and M. Tarquini, Strings from Almost Nothing (2025), arXiv:2508.09246 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Geiser and L

N. Geiser and L. W. Lindwasser, Generalized Veneziano and Virasoro amplitudes, JHEP04, 031, arXiv:2210.14920 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[60]

Cheung, A

C. Cheung, A. Hillman, and G. N. Remmen, Uniqueness criteria for the Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude, Phys. Rev. D111, 086034 (2025), arXiv:2408.03362 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

Plahte, Symmetry properties of dual tree-graph n- point amplitudes, Nuovo Cim

E. Plahte, Symmetry properties of dual tree-graph n- point amplitudes, Nuovo Cim. A66, 713 (1970)

work page 1970
[62]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, and P. Vanhove, Minimal Basis for Gauge Theory Amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 161602 (2009), arXiv:0907.1425 [hep-th]. 7

work page arXiv 2009
[63]

Stieberger, Open & Closed vs

S. Stieberger, Open & Closed vs. Pure Open String Disk Amplitudes (2009), arXiv:0907.2211 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2009
[64]

Euler, Meditations on a Singular Kind of Series, Trans- lated by Alexander Aycock for the Euler-Kreis Mainz, english translation of Euler’s Enestr¨ om E477

L. Euler, Meditations on a Singular Kind of Series, Trans- lated by Alexander Aycock for the Euler-Kreis Mainz, english translation of Euler’s Enestr¨ om E477

work page
[65]

Geiser and L

N. Geiser and L. W. Lindwasser, Properties of infinite product amplitudes: Veneziano, Virasoro, and Coon, JHEP12, 112, arXiv:2207.08855 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[66]

Strictly speaking, we have only shown in the above that the conditionsS Im s,t,u = 0 andA(s, t) =A(t, s) imply Eq. (22). However, it is easy to see that Eq. (22) im- pliesS s,t,u = 0. Therefore, the monodromy condition is equivalent toS Im s,t,u = 0 andA(s, t) =A(t, s)

work page
[67]

Arkani-Hamed, Q

N. Arkani-Hamed, Q. Cao, J. Dong, C. Figueiredo, and S. He, Hidden zeros for particle/string amplitudes and the unity of colored scalars, pions and gluons, JHEP10, 231, arXiv:2312.16282 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[68]

Q. Cao, J. Dong, S. He, and C. Shi, A universal splitting of tree-level string and particle scattering amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B856, 138934 (2024), arXiv:2403.08855 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2024
[69]

Arkani-Hamed and C

N. Arkani-Hamed and C. Figueiredo, All-order splits and multi-soft limits for particle and string amplitudes, JHEP 10, 077, arXiv:2405.09608 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[70]

Hoffman, Multiple harmonic series, Pacific Journal of Mathematics152, 275 (1992)

M. Hoffman, Multiple harmonic series, Pacific Journal of Mathematics152, 275 (1992)

work page 1992
[71]

Zagier, Values of zeta functions and their applications, inFirst European Congress of Mathematics Paris, July 6–10, 1992: Vol

D. Zagier, Values of zeta functions and their applications, inFirst European Congress of Mathematics Paris, July 6–10, 1992: Vol. II: Invited Lectures (Part 2)(Springer,

work page 1992
[72]

Zudilin, Multiple zeta values: Tasting notes (2025), release: 14 April 2025

W. Zudilin, Multiple zeta values: Tasting notes (2025), release: 14 April 2025

work page 2025
[73]

Euler, Meditationes circa singulare serierum genus, Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropoli- tanae20, 140 (1776), written in 1771

L. Euler, Meditationes circa singulare serierum genus, Novi Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Petropoli- tanae20, 140 (1776), written in 1771. A. Multiple zeta values Multiple zeta values (MZVs) can be defined by the Euler-Zagier sum [70–72] ζ(p1, . . . , pd)≡ X ∞>j1>···>jd≥1 1 jp1 1 · · ·j pd d ,(44) wheredis the depth ofζ(p 1, . . . , pd) and the number...

work page