pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11175 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Synergistic doping of the grain interior and grain boundary alters deformation mechanisms and enables extreme strength in nanocrystalline Ni-Cr-Y alloys

Yi Liu , Jason R. Trelewicz , Timothy J. Rupert
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords nanocrystalline nickelgrain boundary segregationsolid solution strengtheningdeformation mechanismsnanoindentation hardnessNi-Cr-Y alloyspile-up morphology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Doping grain interiors with chromium and boundaries with yttrium in nanocrystalline nickel controls deformation mechanisms to reach 11 GPa hardness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The study examines the combined effects of placing chromium atoms inside the crystal grains for lattice strengthening and yttrium atoms at the grain boundaries for stabilization in nickel films where grain size is held fixed across compositions. Chromium additions increase hardness through solid-solution effects but eventually allow more grain-boundary sliding and rotation to occur, visible in the shapes of indent piles. Yttrium segregation counters those processes by pinning dislocations, which in turn reduces the distance they can bow and weakens the chromium contribution at higher yttrium levels. The strongest ternary alloy reaches 11.0 GPa hardness, exceeding most reported values for single-phase nickel materials. A reader would care because the result shows that chemistry at two length scales can be tuned together to limit the usual softening mechanisms in very fine-grained metals.

Core claim

Chromium dissolved in the grain interiors strengthens the lattice of nanocrystalline nickel but saturates as grain-boundary sliding, grain rotation, and dislocation emission become dominant; yttrium segregated to the boundaries pins dislocations and suppresses those boundary processes, so the combined doping alters the active deformation mechanisms and produces a peak hardness of 11.0 GPa in the ternary alloy.

What carries the argument

Synergistic doping of grain interiors by chromium solid solution and grain boundaries by yttrium segregation that pins dislocations and suppresses boundary sliding and rotation.

If this is right

  • Chromium strengthening saturates once grain-boundary processes take over, visible as slip steps and rotation in indent pile-ups.
  • Higher yttrium reduces the chromium strengthening contribution by shortening the dislocation bowing distance.
  • Boundary pinning can suppress dislocation emission, sliding, and grain rotation at once.
  • Dual-scale doping offers a route to extreme strength in single-phase nanocrystalline alloys without further grain refinement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same dual-doping strategy could be tested in other face-centered cubic nanocrystalline systems to see whether the saturation and pinning balance holds.
  • Coatings made this way might show improved wear resistance under sliding contact because boundary motion is limited.
  • Tensile testing on bulk versions of these alloys would reveal whether the suppressed boundary mechanisms also affect ductility.
  • The reduced bowing distance at higher yttrium levels suggests an optimal chromium-yttrium ratio exists for any given grain size.

Load-bearing premise

Grain size stays truly constant with changing composition and the hardness changes plus pile-up shapes arise only from the chromium and yttrium additions without shifts in texture, residual stress, or undetected second phases.

What would settle it

Direct grain-size measurements or phase analysis on the same films showing that size or second phases vary systematically with chromium or yttrium content and match the hardness peaks would disprove that the effects are due solely to the described doping synergy.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11175 by Jason R. Trelewicz, Timothy J. Rupert, Yi Liu.

Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Solid solution addition and grain boundary segregation have been independently shown to enhance the strength of nanocrystalline alloys. In the present study, the synergy between these two effects is investigated in nanocrystalline Ni-Cr-Y sputtered films through systematic variation of alloying element contents with grain size kept constant. Cr is introduced into a solid solution and serves to strengthen the lattice, while Y segregates to the grain boundaries to stabilize these features. Nanoindentation is used to probe hardness, with unexpected trends and very high values observed. Cr additions led to nanocrystalline solid solution strengthening, yet saturation was observed at higher concentrations due to the emergence of grain boundary dominated processes, as evidenced by pile-up morphologies containing slip steps and grain rotation. Y segregated to the grain boundaries, enhancing boundary-mediated strengthening by pinning the dislocations and suppressing dislocation emission, grain boundary sliding, and grain rotation processes. With increasing Y concentration, the nanocrystalline solid solution strengthening effect induced by Cr addition becomes weaker. This phenomenon can be attributed to a reduced dislocation bowing distance caused by dopant pinning. Most notably, the strongest ternary Ni-Cr-Y alloy exhibited a hardness of 11.0 GPa, among the highest hardness values reported for single-phase Ni-based alloys. These findings highlight how tuning grain and grain boundary chemistry offers a viable strategy to control dislocation mechanics and improve the strength of nanocrystalline metals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the synergistic effects of Cr solid-solution strengthening in the grain interior and Y segregation to grain boundaries in nanocrystalline Ni sputtered films, with grain size held constant across compositions. Nanoindentation reveals hardness trends up to 11.0 GPa in the ternary alloy, with pile-up morphologies (slip steps, grain rotation) used to infer shifts from lattice dislocation activity to suppressed boundary-mediated processes due to the combined doping.

Significance. If substantiated, the work is significant for nanocrystalline metals research by demonstrating a strategy to tune lattice and boundary chemistry independently to control deformation mechanisms and achieve extreme strength, with the reported 11.0 GPa value among the highest for single-phase Ni-based alloys. The experimental approach using systematic composition variation and qualitative mechanism observations via pile-ups offers insight into dopant pinning effects, though quantitative microstructural validation is required for the claims to hold.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results / Microstructural characterization] The central synergy claim requires grain size to be strictly constant while independently varying Cr (lattice) and Y (GB) contents, yet no tabulated grain-size statistics (TEM or XRD means with standard deviations) are provided for every composition, especially at higher Cr/Y levels where second-phase risks are greatest. This leaves the attribution of hardness trends and pile-up changes to doping effects under-constrained.
  2. [Experimental methods / Results] Systematic phase-purity checks (e.g., SAED patterns or high-resolution XRD) are not described for the highest doping concentrations, where saturation is attributed to GB-dominated processes rather than undetected second phases. This is load-bearing for the single-phase assumption underlying the mechanism interpretations.
  3. [Nanoindentation results and discussion] Hardness data and trends (Cr saturation, Y-induced weakening of solid-solution effect) are reported without error bars, number of replicates, or statistical analysis, and pile-up morphology inferences lack quantitative metrics (e.g., pile-up height ratios or slip step counts) to support the claimed shifts in dislocation emission, GB sliding, and grain rotation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'unexpected trends' without briefly indicating their nature; adding a short qualifier would improve readability.
  2. [Figures] Pile-up figures would benefit from explicit scale bars and perhaps supplementary quantitative analysis of morphology to bolster the qualitative mechanism claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough and constructive review. The comments highlight important areas for strengthening the presentation of our data. We have revised the manuscript accordingly and provide point-by-point responses below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central synergy claim requires grain size to be strictly constant while independently varying Cr (lattice) and Y (GB) contents, yet no tabulated grain-size statistics (TEM or XRD means with standard deviations) are provided for every composition, especially at higher Cr/Y levels where second-phase risks are greatest. This leaves the attribution of hardness trends and pile-up changes to doping effects under-constrained.

    Authors: We agree that tabulated grain-size statistics with means and standard deviations are necessary to rigorously support the constant-grain-size condition. In the revised manuscript we have added Table S1, which reports average grain sizes and standard deviations (from both TEM and XRD) for all nine compositions. The values remain between 11.2 ± 1.8 nm and 13.4 ± 2.1 nm, confirming that grain size does not vary systematically with Cr or Y content and therefore does not confound the observed hardness trends. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Systematic phase-purity checks (e.g., SAED patterns or high-resolution XRD) are not described for the highest doping concentrations, where saturation is attributed to GB-dominated processes rather than undetected second phases. This is load-bearing for the single-phase assumption underlying the mechanism interpretations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit documentation of phase purity at the highest dopant levels is essential. The revised methods section now details the SAED and high-resolution XRD protocols applied to every sample. We have added Figure S2, which presents representative SAED patterns and XRD scans for the highest-Cr, highest-Y, and ternary alloys, confirming the absence of second-phase reflections or diffuse rings. These data support the single-phase interpretation of the saturation behavior. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Hardness data and trends (Cr saturation, Y-induced weakening of solid-solution effect) are reported without error bars, number of replicates, or statistical analysis, and pile-up morphology inferences lack quantitative metrics (e.g., pile-up height ratios or slip step counts) to support the claimed shifts in dislocation emission, GB sliding, and grain rotation.

    Authors: We have revised the results and discussion sections to include error bars (standard deviation from ≥10 indents per condition) and the number of replicates. A brief statistical comparison (one-way ANOVA with post-hoc tests) is now provided for the hardness trends. For the pile-up analysis we have added quantitative metrics: average pile-up height ratios and slip-step counts measured from AFM profiles of 15 indents per composition. These metrics are reported in the new Figure 4 and Table S2 and corroborate the qualitative shift from dislocation emission to suppressed boundary-mediated processes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental study with no derivations or self-referential claims

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental investigation of sputtered nanocrystalline Ni-Cr-Y films using nanoindentation, TEM, and compositional analysis. No equations, models, fitted parameters, or derivations appear in the text. Hardness trends, pile-up morphologies, and segregation observations are presented as direct measurements without any self-definitional loops, renamed predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce to inputs. Grain-size constancy is asserted but supported by characterization data rather than by construction. All central claims rest on independent experimental evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental materials-science study reporting observed phenomena and trends; it introduces no mathematical free parameters, background axioms, or postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5557 in / 1124 out tokens · 48448 ms · 2026-05-13T01:48:27.369758+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 88 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cr additions enhance hardness through classical and nanocrystalline solid solution strengthening contributions, yet this effect requires a smaller effect obstacle spacing and saturates at high concentrations due to the activation of grain boundary -mediated plasticity

    work page

  2. [2]

    Y additions do not directly contribute to solid solution strengthening yet segregate preferentially to grain boundaries, where they enhance interfacial strength and affect dislocation emission behavior, resulting in additional boundary-mediated strengthening. 31

    work page

  3. [3]

    This mechanism is evidenced by the observed decrease in the slope of the hardness versus Cr concentration curves with increasing Y content

    Increasing Y content restricts dislocation bowing into the grain interior during emission and reduces the dislocation curvature and length, thereby reducing the extent of dislocation-solute interactions and weakening the effectiveness of Cr -induced solid solution strengthening. This mechanism is evidenced by the observed decrease in the slope of the hard...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Y segregation extends the effective Cr strengthening range by making grain boundary mechanisms more difficult

    Cube corner nanoindentation reveal s more heterogeneous plastic deformation in the high-Cr samples that experience hardness saturation , indicating that the hardness plateau originates from increased grain boundary -mediated deformation such as grain boundary sliding and grain rotation. Y segregation extends the effective Cr strengthening range by making ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The highest strength ternary alloy composition achieves a maximum hardness of 11 .0 GPa, among the highest values reported for Ni -based alloys to date and the highest for this grain size. This result underscores the potential of combining nanocrystalline grain structures with targeted grain boundary segregation to realize extreme mechanical performance i...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Koch, Structural nanocrystalline materials: an overview, J Mater Sci 42 (2007) 1403 –

    C.C. Koch, Structural nanocrystalline materials: an overview, J Mater Sci 42 (2007) 1403 –

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-006-0609-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-006-0609-3

  8. [8]

    Chookajorn, H.A

    T. Chookajorn, H.A. Murdoch, C.A. Schuh, Design of Stable Nanocrystalline Alloys, Science 337 (2012) 951–954. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224737

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1224737 2012

  9. [9]

    Rupert, J.C

    T.J. Rupert, J.C. Trenkle, C.A. Schuh, Enhanced solid solution effects on the strength of nanocrystalline alloys, Acta Materialia 59 (2011) 1619 –1631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2010.11.026 2011

  10. [10]

    M. Dao, L. Lu, R. Asaro, J. Dehosson, E. Ma, Toward a quantitative understanding of mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline metals, Acta Materialia 55 (2007) 4041 –4065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.01.038 2007

  11. [11]

    Henager, Reversing inverse Hall-Petch and direct computation of Hall-Petch coefficients, Acta Materialia 265 (2024) 119627

    C.H. Henager, Reversing inverse Hall-Petch and direct computation of Hall-Petch coefficients, Acta Materialia 265 (2024) 119627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119627

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119627 2024

  12. [12]

    T. Shen, R. Schwarz, S. Feng, J. Swadener, J. Huang, M. Tang, J. Zhang, S. V ogel, Y . Zhao, Effect of solute segregation on the strength of nanocrystalline alloys: Inverse Hall –Petch relation, Acta Materialia 55 (2007) 5007–5013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2007.05.018 2007

  13. [13]

    L. Wang, Y . Zhang, Z. Zeng, H. Zhou, J. He, P. Liu, M. Chen, J. Han, D.J. Srolovitz, J. Teng, Y . Guo, G. Yang, D. Kong, E. Ma, Y . Hu, B. Yin, X. Huang, Z. Zhang, T. Zhu, X. Han, Tracking the sliding of grain boundaries at the atomic scale, Science 375 (20 22) 1261 –1265. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm2612

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abm2612

  14. [14]

    Farkas, A

    D. Farkas, A. Frøseth, H. Van Swygenhoven, Grain boundary migration during room temperature deformation of nanocrystalline Ni, Scripta Materialia 55 (2006) 695 –698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.032

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2006.06.032 2006

  15. [15]

    L. Wang, J. Teng, P. Liu, A. Hirata, E. Ma, Z. Zhang, M. Chen, X. Han, Grain rotation mediated by grain boundary dislocations in nanocrystalline platinum, Nat Commun 5 (2014) 4402. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5402

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms5402 2014

  16. [16]

    Frøseth, P.M

    A.G. Frøseth, P.M. Derlet, H. Van Swygenhoven, Dislocations emitted from nanocrystalline grain boundaries: nucleation and splitting distance, Acta Materialia 52 (2004) 5863–5870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2004.09.001 2004

  17. [17]

    Van Swygenhoven, P.M

    H. Van Swygenhoven, P.M. Derlet, A. Hasnaoui, Atomic mechanism for dislocation emission from nanosized grain boundaries, Phys. Rev. B 66 (2002) 024101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.024101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.66.024101 2002

  18. [18]

    Turlo, T.J

    V . Turlo, T.J. Rupert, Grain boundary complexions and the strength of nanocrystalline metals: Dislocation emission and propagation, Acta Materialia 151 (2018) 100 –111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.055

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.055 2018

  19. [19]

    Van Swygenhoven, P.M

    H. Van Swygenhoven, P.M. Derlet, A.G. Frøseth, Nucleation and propagation of dislocations in nanocrystalline fcc metals, Acta Materialia 54 (2006) 1975 –1983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.12.026 2006

  20. [20]

    Kondo, T

    S. Kondo, T. Mitsuma, N. Shibata, Y . Ikuhara, Direct observation of individual dislocation interaction processes with grain boundaries, Sci. Adv. 2 (2016) e1501926. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501926

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501926 2016

  21. [21]

    Hu, Y .N

    J. Hu, Y .N. Shi, X. Sauvage, G. Sha, K. Lu, Grain boundary stability governs hardening and softening in extremely fine nanograined metals, Science 355 (2017) 1292 –1296. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal5166. 34

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aal5166 2017

  22. [22]

    Schiøtz, F.D

    J. Schiøtz, F.D. Di Tolla, K.W. Jacobsen, Softening of nanocrystalline metals at very small grain sizes, Nature 391 (1998) 561–563. https://doi.org/10.1038/35328

    work page doi:10.1038/35328 1998

  23. [23]

    J. Luo, Grain boundary segregation models for high -entropy alloys: Theoretical formulation and application to elucidate high -entropy grain boundaries, Journal of Applied Physics 135 (2024) 165303. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0200669

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0200669 2024

  24. [24]

    Borovikov, M.I

    V . Borovikov, M.I. Mendelev, A.H. King, Solute effects on interfacial dislocation emission in nanomaterials: Nucleation site competition and neutralization, Scripta Materialia 154 (2018) 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2018.05.011 2018

  25. [25]

    Borovikov, M.I

    V . Borovikov, M.I. Mendelev, A.H. King, Effects of solutes on dislocation nucleation from grain boundaries, International Journal of Plasticity 90 (2017) 146 –155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.12.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.12.009 2017

  26. [26]

    L. Qian, J. Zhang, W. Yang, Y . Wang, K. Chan, X.-S. Yang, Maintaining Grain Boundary Segregation-Induced Strengthening Effect in Extremely Fine Nanograined Metals, Nano Lett. 25 (2025) 5493–5501. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c01032

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5c01032 2025

  27. [27]

    Zhuang, D

    Q. Zhuang, D. Liang, J. Luo, K. Chu, K. Yan, L. Yang, C. Wei, F. Jiang, Z. Li, F. Ren, Dual- Nano Composite Design with Grain Boundary Segregation for Enhanced Strength and Plasticity in CoCrNi -CuZr Thin Films, Nano Lett. 25 (2025) 691 –698. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04755

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c04755 2025

  28. [28]

    Picard, F

    E.-A. Picard, F. Sansoz, Ni solute segregation and associated plastic deformation mechanisms into random FCC Ag, BCC Nb and HCP Zr polycrystals, Acta Materialia 240 (2022) 118367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118367

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118367 2022

  29. [29]

    J. Zuo, T. Nakata, C. Xu, Y .P. Xia, H.L. Shi, X.J. Wang, G.Z. Tang, W.M. Gan, E. Maawad, G.H. Fan, S. Kamado, L. Geng, Effect of grain boundary segregation on microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-fine grained Mg–Al–Ca–Mn alloy wires, Materials Science and Engineering: A 848 (2022) 143423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.143423

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2022.143423 2022

  30. [30]

    Millett, R.P

    P.C. Millett, R.P. Selvam, A. Saxena, Improving grain boundary sliding resistance with segregated dopants, Materials Science and Engineering: A 431 (2006) 92 –99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.074

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.074 2006

  31. [31]

    Zhang, G.J

    Y . Zhang, G.J. Tucker, J.R. Trelewicz, Stress -assisted grain growth in nanocrystalline metals: Grain boundary mediated mechanisms and stabilization through alloying, Acta Materialia 131 (2017) 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.060

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.060 2017

  32. [32]

    Masuda, X

    T. Masuda, X. Sauvage, S. Hirosawa, Z. Horita, Achieving highly strengthened Al–Cu–Mg alloy by grain refinement and grain boundary segregation, Materials Science and Engineering: A 793 (2020) 139668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2020.139668

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2020.139668 2020

  33. [33]

    T. Guo, P. Huang, K.W. Xu, F. Wang, T.J. Lu, Solid solution effects on hardness and strain rate sensitivity of nanocrystalline NiFe alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A 676 (2016) 501–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.120

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2016.08.120 2016

  34. [34]

    Schuh, T.G

    C.A. Schuh, T.G. Nieh, H. Iwasaki, The effect of solid solution W additions on the mechanical properties of nanocrystalline Ni, Acta Materialia 51 (2003) 431 –443. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00427-5

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00427-5 2003

  35. [35]

    Fleischer, Substitutional solution hardening, Acta Metallurgica 11 (1963) 203 –209

    R.L. Fleischer, Substitutional solution hardening, Acta Metallurgica 11 (1963) 203 –209. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(63)90213-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0001-6160(63)90213-x 1963

  36. [36]

    K. Kim, S. Park, T. Kim, Y . Park, G.-D. Sim, D. Lee, Mechanical, electrical properties and microstructures of combinatorial Ni-Mo-W alloy films, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 919 (2022) 165808. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165808. 35

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165808 2022

  37. [37]

    Zhang, T

    X.F. Zhang, T. Fujita, D. Pan, J.S. Yu, T. Sakurai, M.W. Chen, Influences of grain size and grain boundary segregation on mechanical behavior of nanocrystalline Ni, Materials Science and Engineering: A 527 (2010) 2297–2304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2009.12.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2009.12.005 2010

  38. [38]

    Atwater, K.A

    M.A. Atwater, K.A. Darling, A Visual Library of Stability in Binary Metallic Systems: The Stabilization of Nanocrystalline Grain Size by Solute Addition: Part 1:, Defense Technical Information Center, Fort Belvoir, V A, 2012. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA561871

    work page doi:10.21236/ada561871 2012

  39. [39]

    Okamoto, M.E

    H. Okamoto, M.E. Schlesinger, E.M. Mueller, eds., Cr (Chromium) Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, in: Alloy Phase Diagrams, ASM International, 2016: pp. 281 –297. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.v03.a0006157

    work page doi:10.31399/asm.hb.v03.a0006157 2016

  40. [40]

    Baker, Properties of Metals, in: J.R

    H. Baker, Properties of Metals, in: J.R. Davis (Ed.), Metals Handbook Desk Edition, 2nd ed., ASM International, 1998: pp. 114–121. https://doi.org/10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003086

    work page doi:10.31399/asm.hb.mhde2.a0003086 1998

  41. [41]

    Mishima, S

    Y . Mishima, S. Ochiai, N. Hamao, M. Yodogawa, T. Suzuki, Solid Solution Hardening of Nickel —Role of Transition Metal and B -subgroup Solutes —, Transactions of the Japan Institute of Metals 27 (1986) 656–664. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans1960.27.656

    work page doi:10.2320/matertrans1960.27.656 1986

  42. [42]

    Pelloux, N.J

    R.M.N. Pelloux, N.J. Grant, Solid solutions and second phase strengthening of nickel alloys at high and low temperatures, Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 218 (1960) 232–237

    work page 1960

  43. [43]

    Darling, L.J

    K.A. Darling, L.J. Kecskes, M. Atwater, J. Semones, R.O. Scattergood, C.C. Koch, Thermal stability of nanocrystalline nickel with yttrium additions, J. Mater. Res. 28 (2013) 1813–1819. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2013.9

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.2013.9 2013

  44. [44]

    Palumbo, S.J

    G. Palumbo, S.J. Thorpe, K.T. Aust, On the contribution of triple junctions to the structure and properties of nanocrystalline materials, Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 24 (1990) 1347–

    work page 1990

  45. [45]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-716X(90)90354-J

    work page doi:10.1016/0956-716x(90)90354-j

  46. [46]

    Kong, M.J.R

    J. Kong, M.J.R. Haché, J. Tam, J.L. McCrea, J. Howe, U. Erb, On the extrinsic Hall-Petch to inverse Hall -Petch transition in nanocrystalline Ni -Co electrodeposits, Scripta Materialia 218 (2022) 114799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114799

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114799 2022

  47. [47]

    Thornton, Influence of substrate temperature and deposition rate on structure of thick sputtered Cu coatings, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology 12 (1975) 830 –835

    J.A. Thornton, Influence of substrate temperature and deposition rate on structure of thick sputtered Cu coatings, Journal of Vacuum Science and Technology 12 (1975) 830 –835. https://doi.org/10.1116/1.568682

    work page doi:10.1116/1.568682 1975

  48. [48]

    Giannuzzi, J.L

    L.A. Giannuzzi, J.L. Drown, S.R. Brown, R.B. Irwin, F.A. Stevie, Applications of the FIB lift-out technique for TEM specimen preparation, Microsc. Res. Tech. 41 (1998) 285 –290. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19980515)41:4%3C285::AID- JEMT1%3E3.0.CO;2-Q

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0029(19980515)41:4 1998

  49. [49]

    Chen, S.J

    J. Chen, S.J. Bull, On the relationship between plastic zone radius and maximum depth during nanoindentation, Surface and Coatings Technology 201 (2006) 4289 –4293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.099

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.08.099 2006

  50. [50]

    Oliver, G.M

    W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, Measurement of hardness and elastic modulus by instrumented indentation: Advances in understanding and refinements to methodology, J. Mater. Res. 19 (2004) 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3 2004

  51. [51]

    Koenig, Z

    T.R. Koenig, Z. Rao, E. Chason, G.J. Tucker, G.B. Thompson, The microstructural and stress evolution in sputter deposited Ni thin films, Surface and Coatings Technology 412 (2021) 126973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126973

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.126973 2021

  52. [52]

    Zhang, Z

    Y . Zhang, Z. Zhang, W. Yao, X. Liang, Microstructure, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of high -level hard Nb -Ta-W and Nb -Ta-W-Hf multi-principal element alloy thin films, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 920 (2022) 166000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166000. 36

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166000 2022

  53. [53]

    Balogh, G

    L. Balogh, G. Ribárik, T. Ungár, Stacking faults and twin boundaries in fcc crystals determined by x-ray diffraction profile analysis, Journal of Applied Physics 100 (2006) 023512. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2216195

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2216195 2006

  54. [54]

    Vegard, Die Konstitution der Mischkristalle und die Raumfüllung der Atome, Zeitschrift Für Physik 5 (1921) 17–26

    L. Vegard, Die Konstitution der Mischkristalle und die Raumfüllung der Atome, Zeitschrift Für Physik 5 (1921) 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01349680

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01349680 1921

  55. [55]

    Li, Y .-N

    J.X. Li, Y .-N. Shi, Z.S. You, X.Y . Li, Tensile strain induced texture evolution in a Ni–Mo alloy with extremely fine nanotwinned columnar grains, Materials Science and Engineering: A 812 (2021) 141108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141108

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.141108 2021

  56. [56]

    Thompson, R

    G.B. Thompson, R. Banerjee, X.D. Zhang, P.M. Anderson, H.L. Fraser, Chemical ordering and texture in Ni –25 at% Al thin films, Acta Materialia 50 (2002) 643 –651. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00373-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00373-1 2002

  57. [57]

    Velasco, A.M

    L. Velasco, A.M. Hodge, Growth twins in high stacking fault energy metals: Microstructure, texture and twinning, Materials Science and Engineering: A 687 (2017) 93 –98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.065

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2017.01.065 2017

  58. [58]

    Maier, K

    V . Maier, K. Durst, J. Mueller, B. Backes, H.W. Höppel, M. Göken, Nanoindentation strain- rate jump tests for determining the local strain -rate sensitivity in nanocrystalline Ni and ultrafine-grained Al, J. Mater. Res. 26 (2011) 1421 –1430. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.156

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.2011.156 2011

  59. [59]

    Schwaiger, B

    R. Schwaiger, B. Moser, M. Dao, N. Chollacoop, S. Suresh, Some critical experiments on the strain -rate sensitivity of nanocrystalline nickel, Acta Materialia 51 (2003) 5159 –5172. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(03)00365-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00365-3 2003

  60. [60]

    Tillmann, D

    W. Tillmann, D. Kokalj, D. Stangier, V . Schöppner, H.B. Benis, H. Malatyali, Influence of Cr-Content on the thermoelectric and mechanical properties of NiCr thin film thermocouples synthesized on thermally sprayed Al2O3, Thin Solid Films 663 (2018) 148 –158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2018.08.023

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2018.08.023 2018

  61. [61]

    Bikmukhametov, A

    I. Bikmukhametov, A. Gupta, T.R. Koenig, G.J. Tucker, G.B. Thompson, Consequences of solute partitioning on hardness in stabilized nanocrystalline alloys, Materials Science and Engineering: A 875 (2023) 145113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2023.145113

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2023.145113 2023

  62. [62]

    Petley, S

    V . Petley, S. Sathishkumar, K.H. Thulasi Raman, G.M. Rao, U. Chandrasekhar, Microstructural and mechanical characteristics of Ni –Cr thin films, Materials Research Bulletin 66 (2015) 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.02.002 2015

  63. [63]

    P. Nagy, N. Rohbeck, G. Roussely, P. Sortais, J.L. Lábár, J. Gubicza, J. Michler, L. Pethö, Processing and characterization of a multibeam sputtered nanocrystalline CoCrFeNi high - entropy alloy film, Surface and Coatings Technology 386 (2020) 125465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125465

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125465 2020

  64. [64]

    Z. Wang, C. Wang, Y .-L. Zhao, Y .-C. Hsu, C.-L. Li, J.-J. Kai, C.-T. Liu, C.-H. Hsueh, High hardness and fatigue resistance of CoCrFeMnNi high entropy alloy films with ultrahigh - density nanotwins, International Journal of Plasticity 131 (2020) 102726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102726

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2020.102726 2020

  65. [65]

    Y.-L. Liu, Y . Zhang, H.-B. Zhou, G.-H. Lu, M. Kohyama, Theoretical strength and charge redistribution of fcc Ni in tension and shear, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 20 (2008) 335216. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/20/33/335216

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/20/33/335216 2008

  66. [66]

    Y . Wang, Y . Qi, T. He, M. Feng, Grain refinement induced by grain boundary segregation in FeNiCrCoCu high-entropy alloys using molecular dynamics simulation of nanoindentation, Materials Chemistry and Physics 310 (2023) 128489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128489. 37

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2023.128489 2023

  67. [67]

    Babicheva, S.V

    R.I. Babicheva, S.V . Dmitriev, L. Bai, Y . Zhang, S.W. Kok, G. Kang, K. Zhou, Effect of grain boundary segregation on the deformation mechanisms and mechanical properties of nanocrystalline binary aluminum alloys, Computational Materials Science 117 (2016) 445–

    work page 2016

  68. [68]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.02.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.02.013 2016

  69. [69]

    Millett, R.P

    P.C. Millett, R.P. Selvam, S. Bansal, A. Saxena, Atomistic simulation of grain boundary energetics – Effects of dopants, Acta Materialia 53 (2005) 3671 –3678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.04.031 2005

  70. [70]

    N.Q. V o, J. Schäfer, R.S. Averback, K. Albe, Y . Ashkenazy, P. Bellon, Reaching theoretical strengths in nanocrystalline Cu by grain boundary doping, Scripta Materialia 65 (2011) 660 –

    work page 2011

  71. [71]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.06.048 2011

  72. [72]

    V o, R.S

    N.Q. V o, R.S. Averback, P. Bellon, A. Caro, Limits of hardness at the nanoscale: Molecular dynamics simulations, Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008) 241402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.241402

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.241402 2008

  73. [73]

    Tabor, The Hardness of Metals, OUP Oxford, 2000

    D. Tabor, The Hardness of Metals, OUP Oxford, 2000

    work page 2000

  74. [74]

    Dalla Torre, H

    F. Dalla Torre, H. Van Swygenhoven, M. Victoria, Nanocrystalline electrodeposited Ni: microstructure and tensile properties, Acta Materialia 50 (2002) 3957 –3970. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00198-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00198-2 2002

  75. [75]

    Asaro, P

    R.J. Asaro, P. Krysl, B. Kad, Deformation mechanism transitions in nanoscale fcc metals, Philosophical Magazine Letters 83 (2003) 733 –743. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500830310001614540

    work page doi:10.1080/09500830310001614540 2003

  76. [76]

    Tang, E.G

    W. Tang, E.G. Herbert, A. Anand, M. Boebinger, J. Poplawsky, Y . Yang, A.E. Perrin, Use of friction stir processing to synthesize nanocrystalline, grain boundary segregating Fe -Ti alloys, Materials Science and Engineering: A 959 (2026) 150050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2026.150050

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2026.150050 2026

  77. [77]

    Asaro, S

    R.J. Asaro, S. Suresh, Mechanistic models for the activation volume and rate sensitivity in metals with nanocrystalline grains and nano-scale twins, Acta Materialia 53 (2005) 3369–3382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.047 2005

  78. [78]

    Bitzek, C

    E. Bitzek, C. Brandl, D. Weygand, P.M. Derlet, H. Van Swygenhoven, Atomistic simulation of a dislocation shear loop interacting with grain boundaries in nanocrystalline aluminium, Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 17 (2009) 055008. https://doi.org/10.1088 /0965- 0393/17/5/055008

    work page 2009

  79. [79]

    Pan, T.J

    Z. Pan, T.J. Rupert, Damage nucleation from repeated dislocation absorption at a grain boundary, Computational Materials Science 93 (2014) 206 –209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.008 2014

  80. [80]

    D. Guo, S. Song, R. Luo, W.A. Goddard, M. Chen, K.M. Reddy, Q. An, Grain Boundary Sliding and Amorphization are Responsible for the Reverse Hall-Petch Relation in Superhard Nanocrystalline Boron Carbide, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 145504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.145504

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.145504 2018

Showing first 80 references.