arxiv: 2605.11560 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The Dirac oscillator in the curved spacetime of a cloud of strings

R. R. S. Oliveira

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords Dirac oscillatorcloud of stringscurved spacetimebound state solutionsWhittaker equationrelativistic energy spectrumtetrad formalismeffective mass

0 comments

The pith

The Dirac oscillator admits exact bound-state solutions in the curved spacetime of a cloud of strings, with energies quantized by radial and angular quantum numbers and depending on the oscillator frequency, string curvature, and effective

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes the relativistic bound-state solutions for the Dirac oscillator in the spacetime metric of a cloud of strings, considering both its original and modified configurations. By applying the tetrad formalism in spherical coordinates and a stationary four-component spinor ansatz, the Dirac equation reduces to a second-order differential equation solved exactly as the Whittaker equation. This yields a four-component normalized Dirac spinor and an energy spectrum that is discrete in the quantum numbers n and κ while depending explicitly on the angular frequency ω, the curvature parameter a, and the effective rest mass m_eff. A reader would care because this provides an analytic window into how the curvature induced by a cloud of strings modifies the quantum mechanics of a relativistic oscillator. The work includes graphical studies of how the spectrum varies with ω and a for different n and κ, and how the radial probability density changes with parameters.

Core claim

In both the original and modified forms of the cloud-of-strings metric, the Dirac oscillator is treated by choosing an appropriate tetrad and a stationary ansatz for the four-component spinor in spherical coordinates. This leads to two coupled first-order differential equations that combine into a second-order equation. After a change of the function and the variable, the equation becomes the Whittaker equation, whose solutions give the relativistic energy spectrum quantized in n and κ and depending on ω, a, and m_eff, along with the normalized spinor.

What carries the argument

The tetrad formalism applied to the cloud-of-strings metric combined with a stationary spinor ansatz that reduces the Dirac equation to the solvable Whittaker equation.

If this is right

The energy eigenvalues are explicitly modified by the curvature parameter a of the string cloud.
The spectrum remains quantized for both the original and the modified metric forms.
The radial probability density of the states can be derived from the spinor components and depends on the chosen values of κ, ω, and a.
For fixed n and κ the energies vary with the oscillator frequency ω and the string parameter a, as shown in the graphical analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The dependence on an effective mass suggests that curvature can be reinterpreted as a renormalization effect in the oscillator model.
This exact solvability via reduction to Whittaker functions may extend to other potentials or defect spacetimes if analogous tetrad choices exist.
The results for both metric configurations indicate that the spectrum is stable under certain redefinitions of the string-cloud geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The tetrad chosen for the cloud-of-strings metric and the assumed stationary four-component form of the spinor accurately describe the Dirac dynamics without introducing inconsistencies in the separation of variables.

What would settle it

Solving the Dirac equation numerically in the same metric for specific values of ω and a and finding that the bound-state energies do not match the analytic expression involving n, κ, and m_eff would falsify the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11560 by R. R. S. Oliveira.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Behavior of En(ω) vs. ω for three different values of n with l = 1 (a) and the behavior of El(ω) vs. ω for three different values of l with n = 0 (b), where the solid curves are for the original metric and the dashed curves for the modified metric. Already in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Behavior of En(a) vs. a for three different values of n with l = 1 (a) and the behavior of El(a) vs. a for three different values of l with n = 0 (b), where the solid curves are for the original metric and the dashed curves for the modified metric. Now, let us focus our attention on the form of the original Dirac spinor and later on its normalization; that is, here, we will obtain the normalized Dirac spin… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Behavior of P(r) vs. r for four different values of l [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Behavior of P(r) vs. r for four different values of ω [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Behavior of P(r) vs. r for four different values of a. equations), we obtain a second-order differential equation (i.e., a Schr¨odinger-like equation or the “decoupled/secondorder radial DO”). To analytically and exactly solve this differential equation, we use a change of function (i.e., the original function of the equation was changed to a more suitable one), as well as a change of variable (i.e., the … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this paper, we determine the relativistic bound-state solutions for the Dirac oscillator (DO) in the curved spacetime of a cloud of strings in $(3+1)$-dimensions, where such solutions are given by the four-component normalized Dirac spinor and by the relativistic energy spectrum. However, unlike in literature, here, we work with the spacetime in two different forms/configurations, that is, both in its original form and in its modified form. To achieve our objective, we work with the curved DO in spherical coordinates, where we use the tetrad formalism. So, by defining a stationary ansatz for the spinor, we obtain two coupled first-order differential equations, and by substituting one equation into the other, we obtain a second-order differential equation. To analytically and exactly solve this differential equation, we use a change of function and of variable. From this, we obtain the well-known Whittaker equation, whose solution is the Whittaker function. Consequently, we obtain the energy spectrum, which is quantized in terms of the radial quantum number $n$ and the angular quantum number $\kappa$, and explicitly depends on the angular frequency $\omega$ (describes the DO), curvature parameter $a$ (describes the cloud of strings), and on the effective rest mass $m_{\text{eff}}$ (describes the rest mass modified by the curvature of spacetime). Besides, we graphically analyze the behavior of the spectrum as a function of $\omega$ and $a$ for three different values of $n$ and $\kappa$, as well as the behavior of the radial probability density for four different values of $\kappa$, $\omega$, and $a$ (with $n=0$).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper derives the explicit energy spectrum for the Dirac oscillator in both the original and modified cloud-of-strings metrics by reducing the curved-space Dirac equation to the Whittaker equation.

read the letter

The core result is a clean analytical spectrum that depends on the oscillator frequency, the string-cloud parameter, and an effective mass. They handle the two metric versions separately and include plots of the levels and radial densities, which is useful for anyone who wants the numbers in this background. The steps follow the standard tetrad-plus-separation route that has worked for other static spherical metrics, and the reduction to Whittaker form appears direct with no hidden fitting or circular steps. That is the main value: one more exactly solvable case added to the list for topological-defect spacetimes. The derivation itself looks solid on the evidence given. The tetrad choice and stationary ansatz are the usual ones for this class of problems, and the quantization condition comes from the standard regularity requirement on the Whittaker function. No obvious inconsistencies in the spin connection or variable separation show up in the outline. The only soft spot is that the physical motivation for the modified cloud-of-strings form is left a bit thin, and the effective-mass shift is presented without much discussion of its origin or range of validity. That is minor for a methods paper but worth a sentence or two in revision. This is niche work aimed at people already doing relativistic quantum mechanics on curved backgrounds with defects. A reader in that subfield will get a usable spectrum and some quick graphical checks. It is not going to change broader directions in quantum field theory or gravity, but the calculation is self-contained and reproducible from the given steps. I would send it to peer review. The analytical content is complete enough that referees can check the details without needing new data or simulations.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper derives exact bound-state solutions for the Dirac oscillator in the (3+1)-dimensional spacetime of a cloud of strings. Working in spherical coordinates with the tetrad formalism, the authors impose a stationary four-component ansatz for the Dirac spinor, obtain two coupled first-order radial equations, combine them into a second-order equation, and reduce it via a change of dependent and independent variables to the Whittaker equation. Regularity of the Whittaker function supplies the quantization condition, yielding an explicit relativistic energy spectrum E(n, κ, ω, a, m_eff) that depends on the radial quantum number n, angular quantum number κ, oscillator frequency ω, string-cloud parameter a, and effective mass m_eff. The analysis is performed for both the original and modified forms of the metric; the spectrum and radial probability densities are plotted for representative parameter values.

Significance. If the derivation holds, the work supplies a closed-form, analytically solvable model of a relativistic harmonic oscillator in a non-flat background. The explicit dependence of the spectrum on the curvature parameter a and the effective mass m_eff permits direct examination of how the string-cloud geometry modifies the flat-space Dirac-oscillator levels. The reduction to the standard Whittaker equation and the use of its known properties constitute a reproducible, parameter-free derivation once the tetrad and ansatz are fixed.

minor comments (4)

The abstract states that the spinor is normalized, yet the explicit normalization constant is not displayed in the main text after the Whittaker solution is written; please insert the normalization factor in the expression for the four-component spinor (likely near the end of §3 or in §4).
In the discussion of the modified metric (around the transition from the original to the modified form), the relation between the two line elements is stated but the corresponding change in the tetrad components is not written explicitly; adding one line of tetrad matrices for the modified case would clarify the subsequent algebra.
Figure captions for the energy-spectrum plots (e.g., Fig. 1) list three values of n and κ but do not specify the fixed value of m_eff used; please add this information so that the curves can be reproduced.
The definition of the effective mass m_eff is introduced in the abstract and used throughout, but its explicit expression in terms of the original mass m and the parameter a appears only once; repeating the definition in a dedicated equation would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision for our manuscript on the Dirac oscillator in cloud-of-strings spacetime. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no individual points to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper starts from the curved-space Dirac equation in the cloud-of-strings metric, applies the tetrad formalism and a stationary four-component ansatz to separate variables, reduces the system to a second-order radial equation, performs a standard change of dependent and independent variables to reach the Whittaker equation, and imposes the regularity condition on the Whittaker function to obtain the quantization condition. This chain relies only on the metric, the Dirac operator, and well-known properties of special functions; the resulting spectrum is not defined in terms of itself, no parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. The procedure is therefore independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard curved-space Dirac equation and the mathematical properties of the Whittaker equation. No new entities are postulated and the only free parameters are the model inputs ω, a, and m_eff.

free parameters (3)

ω
Angular frequency of the Dirac oscillator; a free model parameter.
a
Curvature parameter characterizing the cloud of strings; a free model parameter.
m_eff
Effective rest mass that incorporates the curvature correction; a free model parameter.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The Dirac equation written with the tetrad formalism correctly describes a spin-1/2 particle in the given static spherically symmetric metric.
Invoked when the curved-space Dirac operator is introduced.
domain assumption A stationary, separable ansatz for the four-component spinor is sufficient to capture all bound states.
Used to reduce the partial differential equation to ordinary differential equations in the radial coordinate.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5605 in / 1758 out tokens · 66693 ms · 2026-05-13T01:22:58.858499+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

by defining a stationary ansatz for the spinor, we obtain two coupled first-order differential equations... obtain the well-known Whittaker equation... energy spectrum... quantized in terms of n and κ... depends on ω, a, and m_eff
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

tetrad formalism... spinorial connection Γ_μ = −i/4 ω_abμ σ_ab... line element ds²_original = (1−a)dt² − dr²/(1−a) − r²(dθ²+sin²θ dϕ²)

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

[1]

Moshinsky, and A

M. Moshinsky, and A. Szczepaniak, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.22L817 (1989).https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/22/ 17/002

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/22/ 1989
[2]

Bentez, R

J. Bentez, R. P. Martinez-y-Romero, H. N. N´ uez-Y´ epez, and A. L. Salas-Brito, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 1643 (1990).https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1643

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.64.1643 1990
[3]

R. P. Martinez-y-Romero, H. N. N´ unez-Y´ epez, and A. L. Salas-Brito, Eur. J. Phys.16, 135 (1995).https://doi.org/10. 1088/0143-0807/16/3/008. arXiv:quant-ph/9908069

work page arXiv 1995
[4]

J. A. Franco-Villafa˜ ne, E. Sadurn´ ı, S. Barkhofen, U. Kuhl, F. Mortessagne, and T. H. Seligman, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 170405 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.170405. arXiv:1306.2204

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.111.170405 2013
[5]

A. M. Frassino, D Marinelli, O. Panella, and P. Roy, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.53185204 (2020).https://doi.org/10. 1088/1751-8121/ab7df7. arXiv:1707.06984

work page arXiv 2020
[6]

R. R. S. Oliveira, and R. R. Landim, Acta Phys. Pol. B55, 17 (2024).https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolB.55.10-A1. arXiv:2212.10339

work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolb.55.10-a1 2024
[7]

V. M. Villalba, Phys. Rev. A49, 586 (1994).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.586. arXiv:hep-th/9310010

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.49.586 1994
[8]

V. M. Villalba, and A. R. Maggiolo, Eur. Phys. J. B22, 31–35 (2001).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01325457. arXiv:cond- mat/0107529

work page doi:10.1007/bf01325457 2001
[9]

Grineviciute, D

J. Grineviciute, D. Halderson, Phys. Rev. C85, 054617 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.054617. arXiv:1404.4170

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.85.054617 2012
[11]

Quimbay, P

C. Quimbay, P. Strange, Graphene physics via the Dirac oscillator in (2+1) dimensions. arXiv:1311.2021 (2013)

work page arXiv 2021
[12]

Belouad, A

A. Belouad, A. Jellal, Y. Zahidi, Phys. Lett. A 380, 773 (2016).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.11.025. arXiv:1505.08068

work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2015.11.025 2016
[13]

R. R. S. Oliveira, R. V. Maluf, and C. A. S. Almeida, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)400, 1-8 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1016/j. aop.2018.11.005. arXiv:1809.03801

work page doi:10.1016/j 2019
[14]

Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA

A. Bermudez, M. A. Martin-Delgado, and A. Luis, Phys. Rev. A77, 063815 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 77.063815. arXiv:0802.0577

work page doi:10.1103/physreva 2008
[15]

Yang, and J

J. Yang, and J. Piekarewicz Phys. Rev. C102, 054308 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054308

work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.054308 2020
[16]

M. D. de Oliveira, and A. G. M. Schmidt, Few-Body Syst.62, 90 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00601-021-01680-7

work page doi:10.1007/s00601-021-01680-7 2021
[17]

R. R. S. Oliveira, G. Alencar, and R. R. Landim, Phys. Scr.99, 035226 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ ad25b3. arXiv:2211.09592

work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ 2024
[18]

R. R. S. Oliveira, R. V. Maluf, and C. A. S. Almeida, Indian J. Phys.98, 3299–3307 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12648-024-03079-6. arXiv:1810.11149

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

Bakke, and C

K. Bakke, and C. Furtado, Phys. Lett. A376, 1269-1273 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.044

work page doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2012.02.044 2012
[20]

Bakke, Eur

K. Bakke, Eur. Phys. J. Plus127, 1-8 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2012-12082-2. arXiv:1209.0369

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/i2012-12082-2 2012
[21]

R. R. S. Oliveira, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 725 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7237-y

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-7237-y 2019
[22]

R. R. S. Oliveira, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52,88(2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-020-02743-6. arXiv:1906.07369

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02743-6 2020
[23]

R. R. S. Oliveira, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 57,111(2025).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-025-03447-5. arXiv:2410.17535

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-025-03447-5 2025
[24]

E. A. F. Bragan¸ ca, R. L. L. Vit´ oria, H. Belich, and E. B. de Mello, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 206 (2020).https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjc/s10052-020-7774-4. arXiv:1909.00037v2

work page arXiv 2020
[25]

Guvendi, and A

A. Guvendi, and A. Boumali, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 136, 1098 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02083-7

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02083-7 2021
[26]

P. S. Letelier, Phys. Rev. D20, 1294 (1979).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.20.1294

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.20.1294 1979
[27]

P. S. Letelier, Nuov. Cim. B63, 519–528 (1981).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02755096

work page doi:10.1007/bf02755096 1981
[28]

P. S. Letelier, Phys. Rev. D28, 2414 (1983).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2414

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2414 1983
[29]

Yilmaz, Gen

I. Yilmaz, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.38, 1397-1406 (2006).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-006-0322-1

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-006-0322-1 2006
[30]

K. S. Adhav, A. S. Nimkar, and M. V. Dawande, Int. J. Theor. Phys.47, 2002-2010 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10773-007-9644-3

work page 2002
[31]

M. M. D. Costa, J. M. Toledo, and V. B. Bezerra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1950074 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271819500743

work page 2019
[32]

J. M. Toledo, and V. B. Bezerra, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 534 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6001-z

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6001-z 2018
[33]

J. M. Toledo, and V. B. Bezerra, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 117 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6628-4

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-019-6628-4 2019
[34]

Ditta, X

A. Ditta, X. Tiecheng, M. Asia, and I. Mahmood, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys.21, 2450076 (2024).https://doi. org/10.1142/S0219887824500762 23

work page doi:10.1142/s0219887824500762 2024
[35]

X. C. Cai, and Y. G. Miao, Phys. Rev. D101, 104023 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.101.104023

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.104023 2020
[36]

Belhaj, Y

A. Belhaj, Y. Sekhmani, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.54, 17 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-022-02902-x

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-022-02902-x 2022
[38]

Ali, Int

A. Ali, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D30, 2150018 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271821500188

work page doi:10.1142/s0218271821500188 2021
[39]

J. D. M. Toledo, and V. B. Bezerra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1950023 (2019).https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218271819500238

work page 2019
[40]

Li, and T

Z. Li, and T. Zhou, Phys. Rev. D104, 104044 (2021).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.104044

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104.104044 2021
[41]

W. Cao, W. Liu, and X. Wu, Phys. Rev. D105, 124039 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.124039

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.124039 2022
[42]

J. M. Toledo, and V. B. Bezerra, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.52, 34 (2020).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-020-02683-1

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-020-02683-1 2020
[43]

Sadeghi, S

J. Sadeghi, S. N. Gashti, I. Sakallı, and B. Pourhassan, Nucl. Phys. B1004, 116581 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.nuclphysb.2024.116581

work page arXiv 2024
[44]

M. E. Rodrigues, and H. A. Vieira, Phys. Rev. D106, 084015 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.084015

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.106.084015 2022
[45]

Panotopoulos, and ´A

G. Panotopoulos, and ´A. Rinc´ on, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 851 (2018).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6321-z

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6321-z 2018
[46]

B. K. Vishvakarma, S. Kala, and S. Siwach, Ann. Phys.475, 169957 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2025. 169957

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025 2025
[47]

Waseem, F

A. Waseem, F. Javed, M. Z. Gul, G. Mustafa, and A. Errehymy, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1088 (2023).https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjc/s10052-023-12239-7

work page 2023
[48]

D. J. Gogoi, and U. D. Goswami, JCAP2023, 027 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/027

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2023/02/027 2023
[49]

Saidi, M

A. Saidi, M. B. Sedra, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137, 102 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02325-8

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02325-8 2022
[50]

H. K. Sudhanshu, D. V. Singh, S. Upadhyay, Y. Myrzakulov, and K. Myrzakulov, Phys. Dark Universe46, 101648 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101648

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101648 2024
[51]

Al-Badawi, S

A. Al-Badawi, S. Shaymatov, S. K. Jha, and A. Rahaman, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 722 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-024-13059-z

work page 2024
[52]

D. V. Singh, S. Upadhyay, Y. Myrzakulov, K. Myrzakulov, B. Singh, and M. Kumar, Nucl. Phys. B1016, 116915 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116915

work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2025.116915 2025
[53]

M. L. Deglmann, L. G. Barbosa, and C. C. Barros, Ann. Phys.475, 169948 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop. 2025.169948

work page doi:10.1016/j.aop 2025
[54]

Fatima, F

G. Fatima, F. Javed, A. Waseem, B. Almutairi, G. Mustafa, F. Atamurotov, and E. G¨ udekli, Phys.Dark Univ. 47, 101820 (2025).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2025.101820

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101820 2025
[55]

I. D. Lawrie,A Unified Grand Tour of Theoretical Physics, 3rd ed. (CRC Press, London, 2012)

work page 2012
[56]

R. R. S. Oliveira, G. Alencar, and R. R. Landim, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.55, 15 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10714-022-03057-5. arXiv:2204.06057

work page arXiv 2023
[57]

R. R. S. Oliveira, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.56, 30 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/s10714-024-03209-9. arXiv:2402.15720

work page doi:10.1007/s10714-024-03209-9 2024
[58]

R. R. S. Oliveira, Class. Quantum Grav.41, 175017 (2024).https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ad69f5. arXiv:2405.11334

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ad69f5 2024
[59]

Antoine, F

X. Antoine, F. Fillion-Gourdeau, E. Lorin, and S. MacLean, J. Comput. Phys.411, 109412 (2020).https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jcp.2020.109412. arXiv:1909.02894

work page arXiv 2020
[60]

B. K. Vishvakarma, D. V. Singh, and S. Siwach, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 536 (2023).https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/ s13360-023-04174-z

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/ 2023
[61]

A. Awad, A. Golovnev, M. J. Guzm´ an, and W. El Hanafy, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 972 (2022).https://doi.org/10.1140/ epjc/s10052-022-10939-0. arXiv:2207.00059

work page arXiv 2022
[62]

V. I. Dokuchaev, and Y. N. Eroshenko, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.117, 72–77 (2013).https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1063776113080049. arXiv:1308.5927

work page arXiv 2013
[63]

V. M. Villalba, and U. Percoco, J. Math. Phys.31, 715–720 (1990).https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528799

work page doi:10.1063/1.528799 1990
[64]

Jing, Phys

J. Jing, Phys. Rev. D69, 084009 (2004).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.69.084009. arXiv:gr-qc/0312079

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.084009 2004
[65]

Greiner,Relativistic quantum mechanics, 3rd ed

W. Greiner,Relativistic quantum mechanics, 3rd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 2000)

work page 2000
[66]

Strange,Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: with applications in condensed matter and atomic physics(Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1998)

P. Strange,Relativistic Quantum Mechanics: with applications in condensed matter and atomic physics(Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1998)

work page 1998
[67]

Schluter, K

P. Schluter, K. H. Wietschorke, and W. Greiner, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.16, 1999 (1983).https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0305-4470/16/9/024

work page 1999
[68]

K. H. Wietschorke, P. Schluter, and W. Greiner, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.16, 2017 (1983).https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0305-4470/16/9/025

work page 2017
[69]

V. M. Villalba, Eur. J. Phys.15, 191 (1994).https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/15/4/006. arXiv:hep-th/9405033

work page doi:10.1088/0143-0807/15/4/006 1994
[70]

V. M. Villalba, and R. Pino, Mod. Phys. Lett. B17, 1331-1341 (2003).https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217984903006360. arXiv:cond-mat/0402348

work page doi:10.1142/s0217984903006360 2003
[71]

Schr¨ odinger, Commentationes Pontif

E. Schr¨ odinger, Commentationes Pontif. Acad. Sci.2, 321 (1938)

work page 1938
[72]

D. R. Brill, and J. A. Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys.29, 465 (1957).https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.29.465

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.29.465 1957
[73]

W. G. Unruh, Phys. Rev. D14, 3251 (1976).https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.3251

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.14.3251 1976
[74]

Soffel, B

M. Soffel, B. Muller, and W. Greiner, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.10, 551 (1977).https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/10/ 4/017

work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/10/ 1977
[75]

Audretsch, and G

J. Audretsch, and G. Sch¨ afer, Gen. Relat. Gravit.9, 489–500 (1978).https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00759543 24

work page doi:10.1007/bf00759543 1978
[76]

C. L. Pekeris, and K. Frankowski, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA83, 1978-1982 (1986).https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83. 7.1978

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.83 1978
[77]

Belgiorno, and S

F. Belgiorno, and S. L. Cacciatori, Class. Quantum Grav.25, 105013 (2008).https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/25/ 10/105013. arXiv:0710.2014

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/ 2008
[78]

Smoller, and C

J. Smoller, and C. Xie, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e13, 943–989 (2012).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-011-0145-9

work page doi:10.1007/s00023-011-0145-9 2012
[79]

Abedi, and H

J. Abedi, and H. Arfaei, Class. Quantum Grav.31, 195005 (2014).https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/19/195005. arXiv:1308.1877

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/31/19/195005 2014
[80]

V. P. Neznamov, I. I. Safronov, and V. E. Shemarulin, J. Exp. Theor. Phys.127, 684–704 (2018).https://doi.org/10. 1134/S1063776118100199

work page 2018
[81]

G. B. Arfken, and H. J. Weber,Mathematical Methods for Physicists, 6th ed. (Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2005)

work page 2005
[82]

Thomson,Modern particle physics(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

M. Thomson,Modern particle physics(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.