pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11670 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Barnett effect in rotating spinor dipolar quantum droplets

Donghao Yan, Hiroki Saito, Shaoxiong Li

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords dipolar Bose-Einstein condensatesquantum dropletsvortex statesBarnett effectspontaneous magnetizationLarmor precessionspinor condensates
0
0 comments X

The pith

Releasing the spin degree of freedom stabilizes vortices in self-bound dipolar droplets and generates spontaneous axial magnetization through orbital-to-spin angular momentum transfer.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate droplets, freeing the atoms' spin states stabilizes an embedded vortex that would otherwise collapse or decay. The vortex's orbital motion then spontaneously polarizes the droplet along its axis by converting orbital angular momentum into spin angular momentum, reproducing the Barnett effect in a quantum many-body setting. Application of an external magnetic field causes the entire droplet to rotate rigidly with no shape change, amounting to mechanical Larmor precession of a macroscopic quantum object. Opposite-chirality magnetized droplets also attract each other and form stable bound pairs.

Core claim

When a vortex is embedded into the droplet, spontaneous magnetization arises in the axial direction via a mechanism similar to the Barnett effect; that is, the orbital angular momentum is transferred to the spin angular momentum. When an external magnetic field is applied to the spontaneously magnetized droplet, the entire atomic cloud starts to rotate without changing its shape, which can be regarded as mechanical Larmor precession of a macroscopic object. A chirally different pair of droplets can form a stable bound state because of the attractive interaction between the spontaneously magnetized droplets.

What carries the argument

Vortex-induced orbital-to-spin angular momentum conversion in a spinor dipolar condensate that produces spontaneous axial magnetization.

If this is right

  • The droplet acquires spontaneous axial magnetization solely from the embedded vortex.
  • An applied magnetic field induces rigid-body rotation of the entire cloud without deformation.
  • Oppositely chiral magnetized droplets attract and form stable bound states.
  • Releasing spin provides a route to long-lived vortex states inside self-bound dipolar droplets.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The effect supplies a clean platform for testing mechanical analogs of Larmor precession in isolated quantum objects.
  • Multi-droplet assemblies could exhibit collective rotational dynamics driven by the chiral binding.
  • Similar orbital-to-spin transfer may appear in other self-bound spinor systems once the spin channel is opened.

Load-bearing premise

Releasing the spin degree of freedom stabilizes the vortex in the self-bound droplet without introducing other instabilities or requiring adjustments beyond the mean-field model.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of axial magnetization in a vortex-laden dipolar droplet in the absence of any external field, or observation that the droplet rotates rigidly as a whole under a weak applied field while its density profile remains unchanged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11670 by Donghao Yan, Hiroki Saito, Shaoxiong Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a-c) Nonrotating ground state and (d-f) rotating [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Larmor precession of the vortex droplet in Figs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Bound state of two vortex droplets with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Stability boundary of a vortex droplet with vor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Stability of the vortex droplet against external distur [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Dynamics of bound droplets with initial displacement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We propose releasing the spin degree of freedom to stabilize the vortex state in self-bound droplets of dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates. When a vortex is embedded into the droplet, spontaneous magnetization arises in the axial direction via a mechanism similar to the Barnett effect; that is, the orbital angular momentum is transferred to the spin angular momentum. When an external magnetic field is applied to the spontaneously magnetized droplet, the entire atomic cloud starts to rotate without changing its shape, which can be regarded as mechanical Larmor precession of a macroscopic object. A chirally different pair of droplets can form a stable bound state because of the attractive interaction between the spontaneously magnetized droplets.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that releasing the spin degree of freedom in self-bound dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate droplets stabilizes embedded vortex states. A vortex induces spontaneous axial magnetization through orbital-to-spin angular momentum transfer analogous to the Barnett effect. Application of an external magnetic field then drives rigid rotation of the entire droplet without shape deformation, interpreted as mechanical Larmor precession. Pairs of droplets with opposite chirality are shown to form stable bound states via attractive interactions between their spontaneous magnetizations.

Significance. If the proposed states prove dynamically stable, the work would establish a concrete route to angular-momentum transfer and macroscopic precession analogs in quantum droplets, extending known scalar-droplet physics to spinor dipolar systems. The mean-field plus LHY framework is a standard and appropriate starting point for such calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results on vortex embedding and magnetization] The central claim that releasing the spin degree of freedom stabilizes the vortex state rests on stationarity of the mean-field solution but lacks explicit verification of dynamical stability. Spin-dependent dipolar interactions and possible roton softening introduce additional channels absent in the scalar case; the manuscript must supply the Bogoliubov-de Gennes spectrum or real-time evolution to confirm the absence of imaginary modes before the Barnett-like magnetization and subsequent Larmor response can be regarded as realizable.
  2. [Response to external magnetic field] The assertion that an external magnetic field induces rigid rotation of the spontaneously magnetized droplet without shape change is presented as a direct consequence of the axial magnetization. However, the torque balance and the absence of shape oscillations under the applied field are not quantified; the effective equations of motion for the collective coordinates should be derived or simulated to substantiate the mechanical Larmor precession interpretation.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract summarizes the claims but supplies neither the energy functional nor any quantitative parameters (e.g., droplet size, vortex winding, magnetic-field strength), making immediate assessment of the numerics difficult.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of dynamical stability and collective dynamics that we address below. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis where needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results on vortex embedding and magnetization] The central claim that releasing the spin degree of freedom stabilizes the vortex state rests on stationarity of the mean-field solution but lacks explicit verification of dynamical stability. Spin-dependent dipolar interactions and possible roton softening introduce additional channels absent in the scalar case; the manuscript must supply the Bogoliubov-de Gennes spectrum or real-time evolution to confirm the absence of imaginary modes before the Barnett-like magnetization and subsequent Larmor response can be regarded as realizable.

    Authors: We agree that explicit confirmation of dynamical stability is essential, particularly given the additional channels from spin-dependent dipolar interactions. The original manuscript established the existence of stationary mean-field solutions with embedded vortices and spontaneous axial magnetization. In the revised version, we have added the Bogoliubov-de Gennes spectrum for these states, which shows no imaginary frequencies across the relevant parameter regime. This verifies the absence of unstable modes and supports the realizability of the Barnett-like effect and subsequent dynamics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Response to external magnetic field] The assertion that an external magnetic field induces rigid rotation of the spontaneously magnetized droplet without shape change is presented as a direct consequence of the axial magnetization. However, the torque balance and the absence of shape oscillations under the applied field are not quantified; the effective equations of motion for the collective coordinates should be derived or simulated to substantiate the mechanical Larmor precession interpretation.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation on the need for quantitative support of the mechanical Larmor precession. In the revised manuscript, we derive the effective equations of motion for the droplet's collective coordinates under the external field, demonstrating torque balance that leads to rigid-body rotation without shape deformation. We have also included real-time simulations confirming the absence of shape oscillations during the precession, thereby substantiating the interpretation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; mechanism applies known Barnett effect without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim applies the established Barnett effect (orbital-to-spin angular momentum transfer) to a spinor dipolar droplet with an embedded vortex, after releasing the spin degree of freedom. This is presented as a physical mechanism within the mean-field plus LHY energy functional, not derived by fitting parameters to the target magnetization or by renaming the input. No self-definitional equations appear (e.g., no quantity defined in terms of its own predicted value). No load-bearing self-citations reduce the uniqueness or stability claim to prior author work that itself assumes the result. The numerical stationarity evidence is independent of the final Larmor-precession interpretation. The skeptic concern about possible spin-wave instabilities is a correctness/falsifiability issue, not a circularity reduction. Overall derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5402 in / 1031 out tokens · 53814 ms · 2026-05-13T01:02:52.729706+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. S. Petrov, Quantum mechanical stabilization of a col- lapsing Bose-Bose mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 155302 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    T. D. Lee, K. Huang, and C. N. Yang, Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of a Bose system of hard spheres and its low-temperature properties, Phys. Rev.106, 1135 (1957)

    work page 1957

  3. [3]

    Kadau, M

    H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, C. Wink, T. Maier, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Observing the Rosensweig instabilityofaquantumferrofluid, Nature(London)530, 194 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    Wenzel, F

    M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, T. Langen, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Striped states in a many-body system of tilted dipoles, Phys. Rev. A96, 053630 (2017)

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Schmitt, M

    M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, I. Ferrier-Barbut, and T. Pfau, Self-bound droplets of a dilute magnetic quantum liquid, Nature (London)539, 259 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Ferrier-Barbut, H

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, H. Kadau, M. Schmitt, M. Wenzel, and T. Pfau, Observation of quantum droplets in a strongly dipolar Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 215301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Chomaz, S

    L. Chomaz, S. Baier, D. Petter, M. J. Mark, F. Wächtler, L. Santos, and F. Ferlaino, Quantum-fluctuation-driven crossover from a dilute Bose-Einstein condensate to a macrodroplet in a dipolar quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041039 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Ferrier-Barbut, M

    I. Ferrier-Barbut, M. Wenzel, F. Böttcher, T. Langen, M. Isoard, S.Stringari, andT.Pfau, Scissorsmodeofdipolar quantum droplets of dysprosium atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 160402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    C. R. Cabrera, L. Tanzi, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, P. Thomas, P. Cheiney, and L. Tarruell, Quantum liquid droplets in a mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates, Science359, 301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Semeghini, G

    G. Semeghini, G. Ferioli, L. Masi, C. Mazzinghi, L. Wol- swijk, F. Minardi, M. Modugno, G. Modugno, M. In- guscio, and M. Fattori, Self-bound quantum droplets of atomic mixtures in free space, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 235301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Cheiney, C

    P. Cheiney, C. R. Cabrera, J. Sanz, B. Naylor, L. Tanzi, and L. Tarruell, Bright soliton to quantum droplet tran- sition in a mixture of Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 135301 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Wächtler and L

    F. Wächtler and L. Santos, Quantum filaments in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A93, 061603(R) (2016)

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Wächtler and L

    F. Wächtler and L. Santos, Ground-state properties and elementary excitations of quantum droplets in dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A94, 043618 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Saito, Path-integral Monte Carlo study on a droplet of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate stabilized by quan- tum fluctuation, J

    H. Saito, Path-integral Monte Carlo study on a droplet of a dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate stabilized by quan- tum fluctuation, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.85, 053001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    R. N. Bisset, R. M. Wilson, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Ground-state phase diagram of a dipolar condensate with quantum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A94, 033619 (2016)

    work page 2016

  16. [16]

    Macia, J

    A. Macia, J. Sánchez-Baena, J. Boronat, and F. Maz- zanti, Dropletsoftrappedquantumdipolarbosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 205301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  17. [17]

    Baillie, R

    D. Baillie, R. M. Wilson, and P. B. Blakie, Collective excitations of self-bound droplets of a dipolar quantum fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 255302 (2017)

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    A. R. P. Lima and A. Pelster, Quantum fluctuations in dipolar Bose gases, Phys. Rev. A84, 041604(R) (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    A. R. P. Lima and A. Pelster, Beyond mean-field low- lying excitations of dipolar Bose gases, Phys. Rev. A86, 063609 (2012)

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Böttcher, M

    F. Böttcher, M. Wenzel, J. Schmidt, M. Guo, T. Langen, I. Ferrier-Barbut, T. Pfau, R. Bombín, J. Sánchez-Baena, J. Boronat, and F. Mazzanti, Dilute dipolar quantum droplets beyond the extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation, Phys. Rev. Res.1, 033088 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Ołdziejewski, W

    R. Ołdziejewski, W. Górecki, K. Pawłowski, and K. Rzążewski, Strongly correlated quantum droplets in quasi-1D dipolar Bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 090401 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    R. N. Bisset, L. A. Peña Ardila, and L. Santos, Quan- tum droplets of dipolar mixtures, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 025301 (2021)

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    J. C. Smith, D. Baillie, and P. B. Blakie, Quantum droplet states of a binary magnetic gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 025302 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Boninsegni, Morphology of dipolar Bose droplets, Re- sults Phys.31, 104935 (2021)

    M. Boninsegni, Morphology of dipolar Bose droplets, Re- sults Phys.31, 104935 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Kopyciński, M

    J. Kopyciński, M. Łebek, W. Górecki, and K. Pawłowski, Ultrawidedarksolitonsanddroplet-solitoncoexistencein a dipolar Bose gas with strong contact interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 043401 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    Saito and M

    H. Saito and M. Ueda, Split Instability of a Vortex in an Attractive Bose-Einstein Condensate, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 190402 (2002)

    work page 2002

  27. [27]

    Banerjee, K

    S. Banerjee, K. Zhou, S. K. Tiwari, H. Tamura, R. Li, P. Kevrekidis, S. I. Mistakidis, V. Walther, and C. Hung, Collapse of a Quantum Vortex in an Attractive Two- Dimensional Bose Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 073401 (2025)

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Cidrim, F

    A. Cidrim, F. E. A. dos Santos, E. A. L. Henn, and T. Macrí, Vorticesinself-bounddipolardroplets, Phys.Rev. A98, 023618 (2018)

    work page 2018

  29. [29]

    Zhang, X

    X. Zhang, X. Xu, Y. Zheng, Z. Chen, B. Liu, C. Huang, B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Semidiscrete quan- tum droplets and vortices, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 133901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Nikolaou, G

    S. Nikolaou, G. M. Kavoulakis, and M. Ögren, Rotating quantumdropletsconfinedinaharmonicpotential, Phys. Rev. A108, 053309 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    T. A. Yoğurt, U. Tanyeri, A. Keleş, and M. Ö. Oktel, Vortex lattices in strongly confined quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A108, 033315 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Gu and X

    Q. Gu and X. Cui, Self-bound vortex lattice in a rapidly rotating quantum droplet, Phys. Rev. A108, 063302 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    B. Liu, X. Cai, X. Qin, X. Jiang, J. Xie, B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Ring-shaped quantum droplets with hidden vorticity in a radially periodic potential, Phys. Rev. E 108, 044210 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    L. Dong, M. Fan, and B. A. Malomed, Stable higher- order vortex quantum droplets in an annular potential, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals179, 114472 (2024). 6

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    J. Hu, H. Wang, G. Chen, and Q. Zhang, Stable quantum dropletswithhigh-ordervorticityinzero-orderBessellat- tice, Sci. Rep.15, 3737 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    Y. V. Kartashov, B. A. Malomed, L. Tarruell, and L. Torner, Three-dimensional droplets of swirling superflu- ids, Phys. Rev. A98, 013612 (2018)

    work page 2018

  37. [37]

    Y. Li, Z. Chen, Z. Luo, C. Huang, H. Tan, W. Pang, and B. A. Malomed, Two-dimensional vortex quantum droplets, Phys. Rev. A98, 063602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  38. [38]

    J. R. Salgueiro, A. Paredes, J. Guerra-Carmenate, and H. Michinel, On the stability of vortex quantum droplets, Results Phys.64, 107923 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    G. Li, Z. Zhao, R. Zhang, Z. Chen, B. Liu, B. A. Mal- omed, and Y. Li, Elongated vortex quantum droplets in binary Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A112, 013318 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    M. N. Tengstrand, P. Stürmer, E. Ö. Karabulut, and S. M. Reimann, Rotating Binary Bose-Einstein Conden- sates and Vortex Clusters in Quantum Droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 160405 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Examilioti and G

    P. Examilioti and G. M. Kavoulakis, Ground state and rotationalpropertiesoftwo-dimensionalself-boundquan- tum droplets, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt.53, 175301 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Dong and Y

    L. Dong and Y. V. Kartashov, Rotating Multidimen- sional Quantum Droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 244101 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Caldara and F

    M. Caldara and F. Ancilotto, Vortices in quantum droplets of heteronuclear Bose mixtures, Phys. Rev. A 105, 063328 (2022)

    work page 2022

  44. [44]

    Nikolaou, G

    S. Nikolaou, G. M. Kavoulakis, and M. Ögren, Rotating quantum droplets confined in an anharmonic potential, Phys. Rev. A109, 043304 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Y. Cai, Y. Yuan, M. Rosenkranz, H. Pu, and W. Bao, Vortex patterns and the critical rotational frequency in rotating dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A98, 023610 (2018)

    work page 2018

  46. [46]

    D. Liu, Y. Gao, D. Fan, B. A. Malomed, and L. Zhang, Rotating dipole and quadrupole quantum droplets in binary Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033186 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    G. Li, Z. Zhao, X. Jiang, Z. Chen, B. Liu, B. A. Mal- omed, and Y. Li, Strongly Anisotropic Vortices in Dipo- lar Quantum Droplets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 053804 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Pasquiou, E

    B. Pasquiou, E. Maréchal, G. Bismut, P. Pedri, L. Vernac, O. Gorceix, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Spontaneous Demagnetization of a Dipolar Spinor Bose Gas in an Ultralow Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 255303 (2011)

    work page 2011

  49. [49]

    Lepoutre, K

    S. Lepoutre, K. Kechadi, B. Naylor, B. Zhu, L. Gabar- dos, L. Isaev, P. Pedri, A. M. Rey, L. Vernac, and B. Laburthe-Tolra, Spin mixing and protection of ferromag- netism in a spinor dipolar condensate, Phys. Rev. A97, 023610 (2018)

    work page 2018

  50. [50]

    Matsui, Y

    H. Matsui, Y. Miyazawa, R. Goto, C. Nakano, Y. Kawaguchi, M. Ueda, and M. Kozuma, Observation of the Einstein-de Haas effect in a Bose-Einstein conden- sate, Science391, 384 (2026)

    work page 2026

  51. [51]

    Kawaguchi, H

    Y. Kawaguchi, H. Saito, K. Kudo, and M. Ueda, Sponta- neous magnetic ordering in a ferromagnetic spinor dipo- lar Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A82, 043627 (2010)

    work page 2010

  52. [52]

    Hoshi and H

    S. Hoshi and H. Saito, Symmetry-breaking magnetiza- tion dynamics of spinor dipolar Bose-Einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. A81, 013627 (2010)

    work page 2010

  53. [53]

    Świsłocki, M

    T. Świsłocki, M. Brewczyk, M. Gajda, and K. Rzążewski, Spinor condensate of 87Rbas a dipolar gas, Phys. Rev. A81, 033604 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    Y.Kawaguchi, H.Saito, andM.Ueda, Canspinordipolar effects be observed in Bose-Einstein condensates?, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 110406 (2007)

    work page 2007

  55. [55]

    Kudo and Y

    K. Kudo and Y. Kawaguchi, Hydrodynamic equation of a spinor dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 82, 053614 (2010)

    work page 2010

  56. [56]

    Oshima and Y

    T. Oshima and Y. Kawaguchi, Spin Hall effect in a spinor dipolar Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A 93, 053605 (2016)

    work page 2016

  57. [57]

    Yi and H

    S. Yi and H. Pu, Spontaneous spin textures in dipolar spinor condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 020401 (2006)

    work page 2006

  58. [58]

    Kawaguchi, H

    Y. Kawaguchi, H. Saito, and M. Ueda, Spontaneous circulation in ground-state spinor dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 130404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  59. [59]

    Takahashi, S

    M. Takahashi, S. Ghosh, T. Mizushima, and K. Machida, Spinor dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates: Classical spin approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 260403 (2007)

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    J. A. M. Huhtamäki, M. Takahashi, T. P. Simula, T. Mizushima, and K. Machida, Spin textures in conden- sates with large dipole moments, Phys. Rev. A81, 063623 (2010)

    work page 2010

  61. [61]

    T. P. Simula, J. A. M. Huhtamäki, M. Takahashi, T. Mizushima, and K. Machida, Rotating dipolar spin-1 Bose-Einstein condensates, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, 013001 (2011)

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    B. Liao, S. Li, C. Huang, Z. Luo, W. Pang, H. Tan, B. A. Malomed, and Y. Li, Anisotropic semivortices in dipolar spinor condensates controlled by Zeeman splitting, Phys. Rev. A96, 043613 (2017)

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    M. O. Borgh, J. Lovegrove, and J. Ruostekoski, Inter- nal structure and stability of vortices in a dipolar spinor Bose-Einstein condensate, Phys. Rev. A95, 053601 (2017)

    work page 2017

  64. [64]

    Li and H

    S. Li and H. Saito, Quantum droplets with magnetic vor- tices in spinor dipolar Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 042049 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    S. J. Barnett, Magnetization by Rotation, Phys. Rev.6, 239 (1915)

    work page 1915

  66. [66]

    Uchino, M

    S. Uchino, M. Kobayashi, and M. Ueda, Bogoliubov theory and Lee-Huang-Yang corrections in spin-1 and spin-2 Bose-Einstein condensates in the presence of the quadraticZeemaneffect, Phys.Rev.A81, 063632(2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [67]

    T. A. Yoğurt, A. Keleş, and M. Ö. Oktel, Spinor bo- son droplets stabilized by spin fluctuations, Phys. Rev. A105, 043309 (2022)

    work page 2022

  68. [68]

    Movies are provide in Supplemental files

    See Appendix, which provides additional explanations to the system. Movies are provide in Supplemental files

    work page

  69. [69]

    J. M. Higbie, L. E. Sadler, S. Inouye, A. P. Chikkatur, S. R. Leslie, K. L. Moore, V. Savalli, and D. M. Stamper- Kurn, Direct Nondestructive Imaging of Magnetization in a Spin-1 Bose-Einstein Gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 050401 (2005)

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    D. F. J. Kimball, A. O. Sushkov, and D. Budker, Pre- cessing Ferromagnetic Needle Magnetometer, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 190801 (2016). 7 APPENDIX Dimensionless quantities We normalize the length, time, and wave functions as ˜r=r/L 0, ˜t=tℏ/(M L 2 0), and ˜ψm =L 3/2 0 N −1/2ψm, respectively, whereL 0 is a length unit. The extended Gross-Pitaevskii equation (e...

    work page 2016