pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11805 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Scaling Solutions of Matter Form Factors in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity

Alfio M. Bonanno , Diego Buccio , Emiliano M. Glaviano , Frank Saueressig
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords asymptotically safe gravityrenormalization group flowform factorsscalar fieldfixed pointsnon-local operatorscritical exponents
0
0 comments X

The pith

The scale-dependent form factor for a scalar kinetic term reaches a non-trivial ultraviolet fixed point in gravity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives an integro-differential renormalization group equation for the form factor multiplying the scalar kinetic term in a minimally coupled gravity-matter system. It solves this equation numerically and locates a fixed point where the form factor differs from the standard derivative-squared term. Linearization around the fixed point produces a discrete set of critical exponents. This structure is presented as compatible with asymptotic safety, and the form factor is shown to recover a local expression once the cutoff is removed.

Core claim

The Wilsonian proper-time flow equation yields a closed integro-differential equation for the scale-dependent form factor f_Λ(−□). A pseudospectral discretization finds a non-trivial fixed-point solution f_∗(−□) that departs from canonical −□ behavior. Linearization of the flow about this solution gives a discrete spectrum of perturbations together with associated critical exponents, and the form factor approaches a local expression as the ultraviolet cutoff is taken to infinity.

What carries the argument

The scale-dependent form factor f_Λ(−□) for the scalar kinetic term, which obeys the fixed-point equation obtained from the proper-time renormalization group flow.

If this is right

  • The fixed point supports a non-trivial scaling structure in the non-local sector of the matter-gravity system.
  • A discrete spectrum of critical exponents controls the relevant directions around the fixed point.
  • The bare action in the scalar two-point sector is local once the cutoff is removed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar form factors could be studied for other matter fields to test consistency across the full matter sector.
  • The method may be combined with curvature-squared terms to explore larger truncations of the theory space.
  • Observables derived from this fixed point could differ quantitatively from those obtained in strictly local approximations.

Load-bearing premise

Truncating the effective action to Einstein gravity plus one scale-dependent form factor for the scalar kinetic term, and using the Wilsonian proper-time flow, accurately represents the relevant dynamics.

What would settle it

A calculation with a different regulator or an enlarged truncation that finds only the trivial solution for the form factor or a continuous spectrum of exponents would falsify the reported non-trivial fixed point.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11805 by Alfio M. Bonanno, Diego Buccio, Emiliano M. Glaviano, Frank Saueressig.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Diagrams contributing to the scalar 2-point function: bubble (left) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Fixed-point form factor at N = 25 for different values of m (left panel) and log–log plot of F∗(x)/x (right panel). The solution follows F∗(x) ≃ x up to x ∼ 1 where there is a crossover. For large value x the solutions follow a power law F∗(x) ∼ x α with α ≃ 1.16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Plot of the critical exponents as function of the truncation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the renormalization group flow of a gravity--matter system in which a scalar field is minimally coupled to Einstein gravity and its kinetic term is given by a scale-dependent form factor $f_\Lambda(-\Box)$. Employing the Wilsonian proper-time flow equation, we derive a closed integro-differential equation that encodes the dependence of the form factor on the UV cutoff $\Lambda$. We solve the resulting fixed-point problem with a pseudospectral discretization and find a non-trivial fixed point for which $f_\ast(-\Box)$ departs from the canonical $-\Box$ behavior. Linearizing the flow about this solution yields a discrete spectrum of perturbations and a corresponding set of critical exponents, indicating a non-trivial scaling structure in this non-local sector compatible with asymptotic safety. We also observe that the form factor becomes local once the UV cutoff is removed, suggesting that the bare action associated with this fixed point is local in the scalar two-point sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to derive a closed integro-differential equation for the scale-dependent form factor f_Λ(-□) of a scalar field minimally coupled to Einstein gravity using the Wilsonian proper-time flow equation. It solves the fixed-point problem numerically with pseudospectral discretization, identifies a non-trivial fixed point where the form factor deviates from the canonical -□ behavior, computes a discrete spectrum of critical exponents, and observes that the form factor becomes local as the cutoff is removed, suggesting compatibility with asymptotic safety.

Significance. If the numerical results are confirmed to be robust against truncation and regulator choices, this would represent a significant step in understanding non-local extensions in asymptotically safe quantum gravity. It provides evidence for a scaling solution in the matter form factor sector and highlights the restoration of locality in the UV, which could have implications for the structure of the bare action in ASQG. The work adds to the literature on functional RG methods in gravity-matter systems by addressing a non-local truncation.

major comments (3)
  1. The pseudospectral discretization of the integro-differential fixed-point equation is central to the claim, but the manuscript lacks details on convergence with respect to the spectral basis size, error estimates, or stability of the solution. Without these, the existence of the non-trivial fixed point and the associated critical exponents cannot be considered fully established.
  2. The approximation freezes the graviton propagator in its Einstein form and truncates to a single form factor for the scalar kinetic term, omitting backreaction and higher-order operators. This is load-bearing for the central claim of a non-trivial scaling structure, as gravitational backreaction could alter the fixed point; the paper should provide justification or a test for this truncation's validity.
  3. The choice of the Wilsonian proper-time regulator is not varied, and its dependence is not quantified. Since the fixed point is obtained numerically, demonstrating regulator independence is necessary to support that the result is not an artifact of the cutoff scheme.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions that strengthen the numerical evidence and discussion of approximations without misrepresenting the scope of the present work.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The pseudospectral discretization of the integro-differential fixed-point equation is central to the claim, but the manuscript lacks details on convergence with respect to the spectral basis size, error estimates, or stability of the solution. Without these, the existence of the non-trivial fixed point and the associated critical exponents cannot be considered fully established.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence diagnostics are required to substantiate the numerical results. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection detailing: convergence of the fixed-point form factor and the lowest critical exponents with increasing spectral basis size (N = 15 to N = 50), residual norms of the discretized integro-differential equation, and stability under variations of the initial guess and solver tolerances. These additions will be supported by supplementary figures. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The approximation freezes the graviton propagator in its Einstein form and truncates to a single form factor for the scalar kinetic term, omitting backreaction and higher-order operators. This is load-bearing for the central claim of a non-trivial scaling structure, as gravitational backreaction could alter the fixed point; the paper should provide justification or a test for this truncation's validity.

    Authors: The truncation is a deliberate first-step approximation that isolates the scalar form-factor dynamics while retaining the Einstein-Hilbert graviton propagator. In the revision we will expand the discussion of this choice, citing analogous truncations in the literature where backreaction effects modify quantitative values but preserve the qualitative existence of non-trivial fixed points. We will also state explicitly that a dynamical-graviton test lies beyond the present scope and is planned for future work. revision: partial

  3. Referee: The choice of the Wilsonian proper-time regulator is not varied, and its dependence is not quantified. Since the fixed point is obtained numerically, demonstrating regulator independence is necessary to support that the result is not an artifact of the cutoff scheme.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a systematic regulator-variation study has not been performed. The Wilsonian proper-time regulator was chosen because it yields a closed equation for the form factor. In the revision we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing the expected universality of the qualitative features (non-trivial fixed point and UV locality restoration) on general grounds, while clearly stating that full regulator independence remains to be demonstrated in future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Numerical solution of the derived integro-differential equation exhibits no circularity

full rationale

The paper starts from the Wilsonian proper-time flow equation applied to a truncated gravity-matter action containing a single scale-dependent scalar form factor f_Λ(−□). It derives a closed integro-differential equation for the flow of this form factor and solves the resulting fixed-point problem by pseudospectral discretization, obtaining a non-trivial solution f_∗(−□) that deviates from the canonical −□. Linearization around this solution produces a discrete spectrum of critical exponents. None of these steps reduce to a self-definition, a fitted input renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation chain; the fixed point is an output of the numerical solver applied to the explicitly stated truncation and regulator, not an input smuggled in by construction. The truncation and regulator choices are stated assumptions whose consequences are external to the derivation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the proper-time approximation to the exact renormalization-group equation and on the assumption that the chosen truncation to a single form factor is sufficient to capture the fixed-point structure.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Wilsonian proper-time flow equation provides a reliable approximation to the renormalization-group flow of the gravity-matter system.
    Invoked to obtain the closed integro-differential equation for f_Λ(−□).

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1376 out tokens · 63732 ms · 2026-05-13T05:17:46.577839+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, General Relativity: An Einstein centenary survey, Eds

    S. Weinberg, Ultraviolet divergences in quantum theories of gravitation, General Relativity: An Einstein centenary survey, Eds. Hawking, S.W., Israel, W; Cambridge Uni- versity Press (1979) 790–831

    work page 1979

  2. [2]

    Reuter, F

    M. Reuter, F. Saueressig, Quantum Gravity and the Func- tional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymp- totic Safety, Cambridge University Press, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Exact evolution equation for the effective potential, Phys. Lett. B 301 (1993) 90–94.arXiv:1710. 05815,doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90726-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(93)90726-x 1993

  4. [4]

    T. R. Morris, The Exact renormalization group and ap- proximate solutions, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 9 (1994) 6 2411–2450.arXiv:hep-ph/9308265,doi:10.1142/ S0217751X94000972

    work page arXiv 1994

  5. [5]

    Ellwanger, FLow equations for N point functions and bound states, Z

    U. Ellwanger, FLow equations for N point functions and bound states, Z. Phys. C 62 (1994) 503–510.arXiv: hep-ph/9308260,doi:10.1007/BF01555911

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01555911 1994

  6. [6]

    Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quan- tum gravity, Phys

    M. Reuter, Nonperturbative evolution equation for quan- tum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 971–985.arXiv: hep-th/9605030,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.57.971

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.57.971 1998

  7. [7]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, N. Wschebor, The nonperturba- tive functional renormalization group and its applications, Phys. Rept. 910 (2021) 1–114.arXiv:2006.04853, doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.01.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.01.001 2021

  8. [8]

    Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Grav- ity and Asymptotic Safety, V ol

    R. Percacci, An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Grav- ity and Asymptotic Safety, V ol. 3 of 100 Years of General Relativity, World Scientific, 2017.doi:10.1142/10369

    work page doi:10.1142/10369 2017

  9. [9]

    A. D. Pereira, Quantum spacetime and the renormaliza- tion group: Progress and visions, in: Progress and Vi- sions in Quantum Theory in View of Gravity: Bridging foundations of physics and mathematics, 2019.arXiv: 1904.07042

    work page arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Bonanno, A

    A. Bonanno, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, R. Percacci, M. Reuter, F. Saueressig, G. P. Vacca, Crit- ical reflections on asymptotically safe gravity, Front. in Phys. 8 (2020) 269.arXiv:2004.06810,doi:10. 3389/fphy.2020.00269

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, Quantum Gravity: A Fluctuating Point of View, Front. in Phys. 8 (2021) 551848.arXiv:2007.10353,doi:10.3389/fphy. 2020.551848

    work page doi:10.3389/fphy 2021

  12. [12]

    T. R. Morris, D. Stulga, The Functional f(R) Approx- imation, 2023.arXiv:2210.11356,doi:10.1007/ 978-981-19-3079-9_19-1

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter,

    A. Eichhorn, M. Schiffer, Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter (12 2022).arXiv:2212.07456

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Saueressig, The Functional Renormalization Group in Quantum Gravity, 2023.arXiv:2302.14152,doi:10

    F. Saueressig, The Functional Renormalization Group in Quantum Gravity, 2023.arXiv:2302.14152,doi:10. 1007/978-981-19-3079-9_16-1

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    D’Angelo, R

    E. D’Angelo, R. Ferrero, M. B. Fröb, De Sitter quan- tum gravity within the covariant Lorentzian approach to asymptotic safety, Class. Quant. Grav. 42 (12) (2025) 125008.arXiv:2502.05135,doi:10.1088/ 1361-6382/ade193

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Reuter, H

    M. Reuter, H. Weyer, Running Newton constant, im- proved gravitational actions, and galaxy rotation curves, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 124028.arXiv:hep-th/ 0410117,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.124028

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.124028 2004

  17. [18]

    Eichhorn, A

    A. Eichhorn, A. Held, Top mass from asymptotic safety, Phys. Lett. B 777 (2018) 217–221.arXiv:1707.01107, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2017.12.040 2018

  18. [19]

    Pastor-Gutiérrez, J

    Á. Pastor-Gutiérrez, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, The Asymptotically Safe Standard Model: From quantum gravity to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, SciPost Phys. 15 (3) (2023) 105.arXiv:2207.09817,doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.3.105

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.15.3.105 2023

  19. [20]

    Quark and lepton mixing in the asymp- totically safe Standard Model,

    A. Eichhorn, Z. Gyftopoulos, A. Held, Quark and lep- ton mixing in the asymptotically safe Standard Model (7 2025).arXiv:2507.18304

    work page arXiv 2025

  20. [21]

    Eichhorn, Quantum-gravity-induced matter self- interactions in the asymptotic-safety scenario, Phys

    A. Eichhorn, Quantum-gravity-induced matter self- interactions in the asymptotic-safety scenario, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 105021.arXiv:1204.0965,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.86.105021

    work page arXiv 2012

  21. [22]

    P. Donà, A. Eichhorn, R. Percacci, Matter matters in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89 (8) (2014) 084035.arXiv:1311.2898,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.89.084035

    work page arXiv 2014

  22. [23]

    P. Donà, A. Eichhorn, P. Labus, R. Percacci, Asymp- totic safety in an interacting system of gravity and scalar matter, Phys. Rev. D 93 (4) (2016) 044049, [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 93, 129904 (2016)].arXiv:1512.01589, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.93.129904

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.93.129904 2016

  23. [24]

    Christiansen, D

    N. Christiansen, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Re- ichert, Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter, Phys. Rev. D 97 (10) (2018) 106012.arXiv:1710.04669, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.106012

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.106012 2018

  24. [25]

    Becker, C

    D. Becker, C. Ripken, F. Saueressig, On avoiding Os- trogradski instabilities within Asymptotic Safety, JHEP 12 (2017) 121.arXiv:1709.09098,doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2017)121

    work page arXiv 2017

  25. [26]

    Alkofer, F

    N. Alkofer, F. Saueressig, Asymptotically safef(R)- gravity coupled to matter I: the polynomial case, An- nals Phys. 396 (2018) 173–201.arXiv:1802.00498, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.07.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2018.07.017 2018

  26. [27]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, C. Wetterich, M. Yamada, Higgs scalar potential in asymptotically safe quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 99 (8) (2019) 086010.arXiv: 1811.11706,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.086010

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.086010 2019

  27. [28]

    G. P. de Brito, A. Eichhorn, R. R. L. d. Santos, The weak- gravity bound and the need for spin in asymptotically safe matter-gravity models, JHEP 11 (2021) 110.arXiv: 2107.03839,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)110. 7

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2021)110 2021

  28. [29]

    Laporte, A

    C. Laporte, A. D. Pereira, F. Saueressig, J. Wang, Scalar-tensor theories within Asymptotic Safety, JHEP 12 (2021) 001.arXiv:2110.09566,doi:10.1007/ JHEP12(2021)001

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [30]

    Knorr, Safe essential scalar-tensor theories (4 2022)

    B. Knorr, Safe essential scalar-tensor theories (4 2022). arXiv:2204.08564

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [31]

    S. Sen, C. Wetterich, M. Yamada, Scaling solu- tions for asymptotically free quantum gravity, JHEP 02 (2023) 054.arXiv:2211.05508,doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2023)054

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [32]

    G. P. de Brito, B. Knorr, M. Schiffer, On the weak- gravity bound for a shift-symmetric scalar field, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2) (2023) 026004.arXiv:2302.10989, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.026004

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.108.026004 2023

  32. [33]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, F. Saueressig, Form Fac- tors in Asymptotic Safety: conceptual ideas and computational toolbox, Class. Quant. Grav. 36 (23) (2019) 234001.arXiv:1907.02903,doi:10.1088/ 1361-6382/ab4a53

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [34]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, F. Saueressig, Form Fac- tors in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Grav- ity, 2024.arXiv:2210.16072,doi:10.1007/ 978-981-19-3079-9_21-1

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [35]

    Buoninfante, A

    L. Buoninfante, A. S. Koshelev, G. Lambi- ase, A. Mazumdar, Classical properties of non-local, ghost- and singularity-free gravity, JCAP 09 (2018) 034.arXiv:1802.00399, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/034

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/09/034 2018

  35. [36]

    Bosma, B

    L. Bosma, B. Knorr, F. Saueressig, Resolving Spacetime Singularities within Asymptotic Safety, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (10) (2019) 101301.arXiv:1904.04845,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevLett.123.101301

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [37]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, F. Saueressig, Form Factors in Quantum Gravity: Contrasting non-local, ghost-free gravity and Asymptotic Safety, Nuovo Cim. C 45 (2) (2022) 28.arXiv:2111.12365,doi:10.1393/ncc/ i2022-22028-5

    work page doi:10.1393/ncc/ 2022

  37. [38]

    Draper, B

    T. Draper, B. Knorr, C. Ripken, F. Saueressig, Finite Quantum Gravity Amplitudes: No Strings Attached, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (18) (2020) 181301.arXiv:2007. 00733,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.181301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.181301 2020

  38. [39]

    Draper, B

    T. Draper, B. Knorr, C. Ripken, F. Saueressig, Graviton- Mediated Scattering Amplitudes from the Quantum Effec- tive Action, JHEP 11 (2020) 136.arXiv:2007.04396, doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2020)136

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2020)136 2020

  39. [40]

    A. P. Chiesa, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, Towards Two-to-Two Scattering of Scalars in Asymptotically Safe Quantum Gravity (3 2026).arXiv:2603.10168

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [41]

    Knorr, Asymptotically (un)safe scattering amplitudes from scratch: a deep dive into the IR jungle (2 2026)

    B. Knorr, Asymptotically (un)safe scattering amplitudes from scratch: a deep dive into the IR jungle (2 2026). arXiv:2602.21285

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [43]

    Knorr, M

    B. Knorr, M. Schiffer, Non-Perturbative Propagators in Quantum Gravity, Universe 7 (7) (2021) 216.arXiv: 2105.04566,doi:10.3390/universe7070216

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7070216 2021

  42. [44]

    Bonanno, T

    A. Bonanno, T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Re- ichert, Reconstructing the graviton, SciPost Phys. 12 (1) (2022) 001.arXiv:2102.02217,doi:10.21468/ SciPostPhys.12.1.001

    work page arXiv 2022

  43. [45]

    Fehre, D

    J. Fehre, D. F. Litim, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Re- ichert, Lorentzian Quantum Gravity and the Gravi- ton Spectral Function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (8) (2023) 081501.arXiv:2111.13232,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.130.081501

    work page arXiv 2023

  44. [46]

    Braun, et al., Renormalised spectral flows, SciPost Phys

    J. Braun, et al., Renormalised spectral flows, SciPost Phys. Core 6 (2023) 061.arXiv:2206.10232,doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhysCore.6.3.061

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscore.6.3.061 2023

  45. [47]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, Quantum Gravity from Dy- namical Metric Fluctuations, 2024.arXiv:2309.10785, doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_17-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3079-9_17-1 2024

  46. [48]

    J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, J. Wessely, Self-consistent graviton spectral function in Lorentzian quantum gravity (7 2025).arXiv:2507.22169

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [49]

    A. M. Bonanno, S. R. Haridev, G. Narain, RG studies of scalar-field models of long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. D 113 (4) (2026) 045021.arXiv:2511.22666,doi:10. 1103/tfqd-hvmy

    work page arXiv 2026

  48. [50]

    Bonanno, M

    A. Bonanno, M. Reuter, Proper time flow equation for gravity, JHEP 02 (2005) 035.arXiv:hep-th/0410191, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/035

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/035 2005

  49. [51]

    On Exact Proper Time Wilso- nian RG Flows,

    A. Bonanno, S. Lippoldt, R. Percacci, G. P. Vacca, On Exact Proper Time Wilsonian RG Flows, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (3) (2020) 249.arXiv:1912.08135,doi:10.1140/ epjc/s10052-020-7798-9

    work page arXiv 2020

  50. [52]

    Gauge and parametrization dependence of quantum Einstein gravity within the proper time flow,

    A. Bonanno, G. Oglialoro, D. Zappalà, Gauge and parametrization dependence of quantum Einstein grav- ity within the proper time flow, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2) (2025) 026002.arXiv:2504.07877,doi:10.1103/ sht5-sf25

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [53]

    E. M. Glaviano, A. Bonanno, Proper-time flow equation and non-local truncations in quantum gravity, in: 17th Marcel Grossmann Meeting: On Recent Developments in Theoretical and Experimental General Relativity, Grav- itation, and Relativistic Field Theories, 2024.arXiv: 2410.23696. 8

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [54]

    Manrique, M

    E. Manrique, M. Reuter, Bare Action and Regular- ized Functional Integral of Asymptotically Safe Quan- tum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 025008.arXiv: 0811.3888,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.79.025008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.025008 2009

  53. [55]

    Manrique, M

    E. Manrique, M. Reuter, Bare versus Effective Fixed Point Action in Asymptotic Safety: The Reconstruction Prob- lem, PoS CLAQG08 (2011) 001.arXiv:0905.4220, doi:10.22323/1.079.0001

    work page doi:10.22323/1.079.0001 2011

  54. [56]

    T. R. Morris, Z. H. Slade, Solutions to the re- construction problem in asymptotic safety, JHEP 11 (2015) 094.arXiv:1507.08657,doi:10.1007/ JHEP11(2015)094

    work page arXiv 2015

  55. [57]

    Nicolás, The bar derived category of a curved dg algebra, Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra 212 (2008) 2633–2659

    M. Fraaije, A. Platania, F. Saueressig, On the recon- struction problem in quantum gravity, Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137399.arXiv:2206.10626,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2022.137399

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2022

  56. [58]

    S. P. de Alwis, Exact RG Flow Equations and Quantum Gravity, JHEP 03 (2018) 118.arXiv:1707.09298,doi: 10.1007/JHEP03(2018)118

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2018)118 2018

  57. [59]

    Codello, O

    A. Codello, O. Zanusso, On the non-local heat kernel expansion, J. Math. Phys. 54 (2013) 013513.arXiv: 1203.2034,doi:10.1063/1.4776234

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4776234 2013

  58. [60]

    J. Boyd, T. Marilyn, P. Eliot, Chebyshev and Fourier Spec- tral Methods, Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2000

    work page 2000

  59. [61]

    Christiansen, B

    N. Christiansen, B. Knorr, J. Meibohm, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, Local Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 92 (12) (2015) 121501.arXiv:1506.07016,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.92.121501. 9

    work page arXiv 2015