arxiv: 2605.11821 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Thermodynamic formulation of Cotton gravity in the Codazzi parametrization

Shayesteh Ghaffari , Giuseppe Gaetano Luciano , Carlo Alberto Mantica

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc

keywords Cotton gravityCodazzi parametrizationholographic entropyhorizon thermodynamicsmodified gravityFRW spacetimesspherically symmetric spacetimesfirst law of thermodynamics

0 comments

The pith

The first law of thermodynamics applied to horizons in Cotton gravity yields a holographic entropy modified by the Codazzi tensor.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a thermodynamic interpretation for Cotton gravity in its Codazzi parametrization by linking gravitational dynamics to horizon properties. Applying the first law to apparent cosmological horizons in FRW spacetimes and event horizons in static spherical spacetimes produces an entropy expression that augments the Bekenstein-Hawking area law with a term proportional to the Codazzi tensor. This extra term depends on the tensor's temporal part cosmologically and its anisotropic components in static geometries. The sign of the correction can indicate the type of matter sourcing the spacetime, distinguishing ordinary matter from a cosmological constant or phantom energy.

Core claim

By implementing the first law of thermodynamics on the apparent cosmological and event horizons, we derive a modified holographic entropy consisting of the standard Bekenstein-Hawking term supplemented by a correction induced by the Codazzi tensor. In the cosmological setting, this correction is governed by the temporal component of the Codazzi tensor, while in static configurations it is controlled by its anisotropic sector. Remarkably, the sign of this contribution provides a potential diagnostic of the underlying matter content, allowing one to distinguish between ordinary matter, a cosmological constant and phantom-like components.

What carries the argument

The Codazzi tensor in the parametrization of Cotton gravity, which supplies the correction term to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy when the first law of thermodynamics is applied to apparent horizons.

If this is right

The modified entropy formula holds for both FRW cosmological models and static spherically symmetric configurations.
The sign of the Codazzi correction term distinguishes ordinary matter, a cosmological constant, and phantom-like components.
Horizon thermodynamics provides a probe of the statistical and thermodynamic properties of spacetime in the Codazzi formulation.
This approach supplies information complementary to background kinematic descriptions of the theory.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar entropy corrections might arise when the same thermodynamic method is applied to other modified gravity models that introduce auxiliary tensors.
Observational data on cosmological horizons or black hole entropies could be reanalyzed to search for the predicted Codazzi term.
The correction may alter standard results for black hole thermodynamics or universe evolution within this gravity framework.

Load-bearing premise

The standard first law of thermodynamics applies without additional correction terms to the horizons of Cotton gravity in the Codazzi parametrization.

What would settle it

A calculation or observation of the entropy for an apparent horizon in a known Cotton gravity solution that deviates from the predicted Bekenstein-Hawking term plus Codazzi correction would falsify the derivation.

read the original abstract

We develop a thermodynamic formulation of Cotton gravity in the Codazzi parametrization, providing a general framework in which the gravitational dynamics can be interpreted in terms of horizon thermodynamics. As paradigmatic examples, we apply the formalism to FriedmannRobertson-Walker (FRW) and static spherically symmetric spacetimes. By implementing the first law of thermodynamics on the apparent cosmological and event horizons, we derive a modified holographic entropy consisting of the standard Bekenstein-Hawking term supplemented by a correction induced by the Codazzi tensor. In the cosmological setting, this correction is governed by the temporal component of the Codazzi tensor, while in static configurations it is controlled by its anisotropic sector. Remarkably, the sign of this contribution provides a potential diagnostic of the underlying matter content, allowing one to distinguish between ordinary matter, a cosmological constant and phantom-like components. These results establish horizon thermodynamics as a sensitive probe of Cotton gravity, offering a complementary perspective beyond background kinematics and enabling a characterization of the statistical and thermodynamic properties of spacetime within the Codazzi formulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a Codazzi-induced correction to Bekenstein-Hawking entropy for Cotton gravity by applying the standard first law to FRW and static horizons, with the correction sign as a potential matter diagnostic.

read the letter

The core result is a modified entropy S = A/4G plus a term controlled by the Codazzi tensor. In cosmology the correction comes from its time component; in static spherical cases it comes from the anisotropic part. They show this for apparent horizons in FRW and event horizons in static metrics, and note that the sign could separate ordinary matter, a cosmological constant, and phantom fields. That is the new piece: a concrete thermodynamic reading of Cotton gravity in the Codazzi parametrization rather than just kinematic solutions. It sits cleanly inside the existing literature on horizon thermodynamics in modified gravity and gives a practical way to read the extra tensor off thermodynamic quantities. The calculations appear straightforward once the first law is imposed, and the two example spacetimes are worked out explicitly enough to see the pattern. The main soft spot is the starting assumption. They impose the unmodified first law dE = T dS + W dV and fold all Codazzi effects into the entropy correction. The paper does not appear to derive the energy flux or Misner-Sharp-like quantity from the full field equations to confirm that no extra work terms or surface-gravity shifts arise. If that check is missing or only sketched, the derivation risks absorbing unknown contributions into the entropy term. The GR limit when the Codazzi tensor vanishes is mentioned but not shown in detail. This is the kind of paper that belongs in the modified-gravity and horizon-thermodynamics corner of gr-qc. Readers already working with thermodynamic derivations in f(R) or other extensions will find the specific application useful and the matter-diagnostic idea worth testing. It is not broad enough to change how most people think about gravity, but the execution is direct and the examples are reproducible in principle. I would send it to referees. The central claim is clear, the examples are concrete, and the potential gap on the energy balance is fixable with one or two extra sections rather than a rewrite.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops a thermodynamic formulation of Cotton gravity in the Codazzi parametrization. It applies the first law of thermodynamics to apparent cosmological horizons in FRW spacetimes and event horizons in static spherically symmetric spacetimes, deriving a modified holographic entropy that augments the Bekenstein-Hawking term with a correction induced by the Codazzi tensor. In cosmology the correction depends on the temporal Codazzi component; in static cases it is controlled by the anisotropic sector. The sign of the correction is proposed as a diagnostic for the underlying matter content (ordinary, cosmological constant, or phantom).

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies a thermodynamic probe of Cotton gravity that is complementary to purely kinematic analyses and could characterize the statistical properties of spacetime in this formulation. The ability to distinguish matter types via the sign of the entropy correction would be a concrete, falsifiable output of the approach.

major comments (1)

[FRW application and static spherical application sections] The derivation assumes that the unmodified first law dE = T dS + W dV holds on the horizons, with all Codazzi contributions absorbed solely into the entropy correction. The manuscript must explicitly compute the energy flux (or equivalent Misner-Sharp-like quantity) from the Cotton gravity field equations in the FRW and static cases to confirm that no additional work terms, modified surface gravity, or non-equilibrium contributions arise. Without this step the central claim that the standard first law applies directly is not yet load-bearing.

minor comments (1)

The abstract states that the correction 'is governed by' or 'controlled by' components of the Codazzi tensor; the explicit functional form of the correction should be written out in the main text with the relevant tensor components identified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript concerning the thermodynamic formulation of Cotton gravity in the Codazzi parametrization. We address the major comment in detail below and have made revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The derivation assumes that the unmodified first law dE = T dS + W dV holds on the horizons, with all Codazzi contributions absorbed solely into the entropy correction. The manuscript must explicitly compute the energy flux (or equivalent Misner-Sharp-like quantity) from the Cotton gravity field equations in the FRW and static cases to confirm that no additional work terms, modified surface gravity, or non-equilibrium contributions arise. Without this step the central claim that the standard first law applies directly is not yet load-bearing.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on verifying the applicability of the standard first law. In our derivation, the first law is applied in its standard form dE = T dS + W dV, where the energy E is identified with the Misner-Sharp energy, and the Codazzi tensor contributions are incorporated into the entropy S. To address this concern, we have now explicitly computed the energy flux from the Cotton gravity field equations in both the FRW and static spherically symmetric spacetimes. These calculations confirm that no additional work terms or modifications to the surface gravity arise beyond those already accounted for in the entropy correction. The details of this computation have been added to the revised manuscript in the relevant sections on FRW and static cases. We believe this establishes that the central claim holds. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation applies standard first law to obtain Codazzi correction without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper's central step imposes the unmodified first law of thermodynamics on apparent and event horizons in FRW and static spherical spacetimes to obtain a modified entropy S = A/4G + correction(Codazzi). This is an application of an external thermodynamic relation to the given gravitational theory rather than a self-definitional loop, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations in the abstract or description reduce the Codazzi term to a fit or prior result by construction; the correction is presented as emerging from the horizon balance. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks (standard first law plus Codazzi field equations) and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatze from the authors' prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the first law to horizons in this modified theory and on the validity of the Codazzi parametrization; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The first law of thermodynamics holds on apparent cosmological and event horizons in Cotton gravity
Invoked to obtain the modified entropy expression from the horizon dynamics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5485 in / 1200 out tokens · 57341 ms · 2026-05-13T05:03:46.948301+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

By implementing the first law of thermodynamics on the apparent cosmological and event horizons, we derive a modified holographic entropy consisting of the standard Bekenstein-Hawking term supplemented by a correction induced by the Codazzi tensor.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the entropy correction is governed by the temporal component of the Codazzi tensor... or by its anisotropic sector

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

[1]

(24) becomes ∆S=− 8π2 κ Z ˜r4 AHA(t)dt.(25) The spatial curvature now enters only implicitly through the horizon radius

Geometric-thermodynamic viewpoint: entropy in terms of the Codazzi parameters Using the Codazzi condition (9), Eq. (24) becomes ∆S=− 8π2 κ Z ˜r4 AHA(t)dt.(25) The spatial curvature now enters only implicitly through the horizon radius. Consequently, the entropy correction is fully determined by the temporal componentA(t)of the Codazzi tensor. In particula...

work page
[2]

(24) can be expressed in terms of standard cosmological observables by means of the modified Friedmann equations

Phenomenological viewpoint: linking Codazzi parameters to cosmological variables The entropy correction in Eq. (24) can be expressed in terms of standard cosmological observables by means of the modified Friedmann equations. This leads to the following phenomenological representation: ∆S= 8π 2 Z ˜r4 AH (ρ+p) + 2 κ ˙H− 2k κa2 dt.(26) The expression in brac...

work page
[3]

Next, we consider a closed, matter-dominated universe (k= +1, p= 0)

If the same expansion history is imposed in Cotton gravity, we then obtainA(t) = 0. Next, we consider a closed, matter-dominated universe (k= +1, p= 0). If the expansion history is taken to be approximately GR-like, the modified field equations ad- mit a nonvanishing contribution from the Codazzi sector. To model this effect, we consider a scalingA(t)∝a −...

work page
[4]

Model I: Constant Anisotropy,C(r) =λ As a first illustrative example, we consider a constant ansatz for the anisotropic component of the Codazzi tensor,C(r) =λ. This choice captures a uniform ra- dial anisotropy, providing a controlled setting to isolate how a constant geometric deformation affects the near- horizon structure and thermodynamic quantities....

work page
[5]

dust-like

Model II: Radially Modulated Anisotropy, C(r) =λ √ f(r) r As a second example, we consider the radially de- pendent ansatzC(r) =λ √ f(r) r . Unlike the constant 8 case, this choice is explicitly sensitive to the geometry through the metric functionf(r)and therefore captures how anisotropic geometric contributions vary across the spacetime. Phenomenologica...

work page
[6]

Carlip, Rept

S. Carlip, Rept. Prog. Phys.64, 885 (2001)

work page 2001
[7]

Clifton, P

T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, Phys. Rept.513, 1-189 (2012)

work page 2012
[8]

P. Bull, Y. Akrami, J. Adamek, T. Baker, E. Bellini, J. Beltran Jimenez, E. Bentivegna, S. Camera, S. Clesse and J. H. Davis,et al.Phys. Dark Univ.12, 56-99 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Rovelli,Quantum gravity, Univ

C. Rovelli,Quantum gravity, Univ. Pr., 2004

work page 2004
[10]

Kiefer, Annalen Phys.15, 129-148 (2005)

C. Kiefer, Annalen Phys.15, 129-148 (2005)

work page 2005
[11]

Capozziello and M

S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Phys. Rept.509, 167-321 (2011)

work page 2011
[12]

Zwicky, Helv

F. Zwicky, Helv. Phys. Acta6, 110-127 (1933)

work page 1933
[13]

V. C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., Astrophys. J.159, 379-403 (1970)

work page 1970
[14]

A. G. Riesset al.[Supernova Search Team], Astron. J. 116, 1009-1038 (1998)

work page 1998
[15]

Perlmutteret al.[Supernova Cosmology Project], As- trophys

S. Perlmutteret al.[Supernova Cosmology Project], As- trophys. J.517, 565-586 (1999)

work page 1999
[16]

P. J. E. Peebles and B. Ratra, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 559- 12 606 (2003)

work page 2003
[17]

Nojiri and S

S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rept.505, 59-144 (2011)

work page 2011
[18]

E. N. Saridakiset al.[CANTATA], Springer, 2021, [arXiv:2105.12582 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Harada, Phys

J. Harada, Phys. Rev. D103, L121502 (2021)

work page 2021
[20]

Harada, Phys

J. Harada, Phys. Rev. D106, 064044 (2022)

work page 2022
[21]

Harada, Phys

J. Harada, Phys. Rev. D108, 044031 (2023)

work page 2023
[22]

Harada, Phys

J. Harada, Phys. Rev. D108, 104037 (2023)

work page 2023
[23]

C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, Phys. Rev. D108, 124029 (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, Gen. Rel. Grav.55, 62 (2023)

work page 2023
[25]

C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, Phys. Rev. D109, 044059 ( 2024)

work page 2024
[26]

R. A. Sussman and S. Najera, [arXiv:2311.06744 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv
[27]

R. A. Sussman and S. Najera, [arXiv:2312.02115 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv
[28]

R. A. Sussman and S. Najera, Class. Quantum Grav.41, 245019 (2024)

work page 2024
[29]

Clemént and K

G. Clemént and K. Nouicer, Class. Quantum Grav.41 165005 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

Capozziello, C

S. Capozziello, C. A. Mantica, L. G. Molinari and G. Sar- racino, Phys. Rev. D113, 015006 (2026)

work page 2026
[31]

Khodadi, G

M. Khodadi, G. Lambiase and J. T. Firouzjaee, JHEAp 50, 100512 (2026)

work page 2026
[32]

C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, Phys. Rev. D110, 064041 (2024)

work page 2024
[33]

C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, Phys. Rev. D111, 064085 (2025)

work page 2025
[34]

Ghaffari and G

S. Ghaffari and G. G. Luciano, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 785 (2025)

work page 2025
[35]

Jacobson, Phys

T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1260-1263 (1995)

work page 1995
[36]

Padmanabhan, Phys

T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rept.406, 49-125 (2005)

work page 2005
[37]

Padmanabhan, Rept

T. Padmanabhan, Rept. Prog. Phys.73, 046901 (2010)

work page 2010
[38]

Paranjape, S

A. Paranjape, S. Sarkar and T. Padmanabhan, Phys. Rev. D74, 104015 (2006)

work page 2006
[39]

A. V. Frolov and L. Kofman, JCAP05, 009 (2003)

work page 2003
[40]

R. G. Cai and S. P. Kim, JHEP02, 050 (2005)

work page 2005
[41]

R. G. Cai and L. M. Cao, Nucl. Phys. B785, 135-148 (2007)

work page 2007
[42]

Moradpour, S

H. Moradpour, S. A. Moosavi, I. P. Lobo, J. P. Morais Graça, A. Jawad and I. G. Salako, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 829 (2018)

work page 2018
[43]

S.Capozziello, R.D’AgostinoandO.Luongo, Phys.Dark Univ.36, 101045 (2022)

work page 2022
[44]

Astrophys.537, A11 (2012)

R.Silva, R.S.Goncalves, J.S.AlcanizandH.H.B.Silva, Astron. Astrophys.537, A11 (2012)

work page 2012
[45]

R. M. Wald, Class. Quant. Grav.16, A177-A190 (1999)

work page 1999
[46]

Moradpour, S

H. Moradpour, S. Jalalzadeh and U. K. Sharma, Eur. Phys. J. Plus139, 170 (2024)

work page 2024
[47]

Buoninfante, G

L. Buoninfante, G. G. Luciano, L. Petruzziello and F. Scardigli, Phys. Lett. B824, 136818 (2022)

work page 2022
[48]

Akbar and R

M. Akbar and R. G. Cai, Phys. Lett. B648, 243-248 (2007)

work page 2007
[49]

Faraoni,Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004)

V. Faraoni,Cosmology in Scalar-Tensor Gravity, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004)

work page 2004
[50]

Sheykhi, M

A. Sheykhi, M. Jamil, Phys. Rev. D81, 104011 (2010)

work page 2010
[51]

Moradpour, Phys

H. Moradpour, Phys. Lett. B757, 187-191 (2016)

work page 2016
[52]

Jalalzadeh, S

R. Jalalzadeh, S. Jalalzadeh, A. S. Jahromi and H. Moradpour, Phys. Dark Univ.44, 101498 (2024)

work page 2024
[53]

Moradpour, Int

H. Moradpour, Int. J. Theor. Phys.55, 4176-4184 (2016)

work page 2016
[54]

Eling, R

C. Eling, R. Guedens and T. Jacobson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 121301 (2006)

work page 2006
[55]

Sheykhi, Eur

A. Sheykhi, Eur. Phys. J. C69, 265?269 (2010)

work page 2010
[56]

Sheykhi, B

A. Sheykhi, B. Wang and R. G. Cai, Phys. Rev. D76, 023515 (2007)

work page 2007
[57]

Sheykhi, B

A. Sheykhi, B. Wang, R.G. Cai, Nucl. Phys. B,779, 1 (2007)

work page 2007
[58]

Moradpour and I

H. Moradpour and I. G. Salako, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2016, 3492796 (2016)

work page 2016
[59]

Tsallis and L

C. Tsallis and L. J. L. Cirto,Eur. Phys. J. C73, 2487 (2013)

work page 2013
[60]

Jizba and T

P. Jizba and T. Arimitsu, Annals Phys.312, 17-57 (2004)

work page 2004
[61]

J. D. Barrow, Phys. Lett. B808, 135643 (2020)

work page 2020
[62]

Nojiri, S

S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov and T. Paul, Phys. Lett. B847, 138321 (2023)

work page 2023
[63]

E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D102, 123525 (2020)

work page 2020
[64]

E. N. Saridakis, K. Bamba, R. Myrzakulov and F. K. Anagnostopoulos, JCAP12, 012 (2018)

work page 2018
[65]

Ghaffari, G

S. Ghaffari, G. G. Luciano and S. Capozziello, Eur. Phys. J. Plus138, 82 (2023)

work page 2023
[66]

Gohar and V

H. Gohar and V. Salzano, Phys. Lett. B855, 138781 (2024)

work page 2024
[67]

G. G. Luciano and E. N. Saridakis, [arXiv:2602.20004 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv
[68]

Anand, S

A. Anand, S. Devdutt, K. Jusufi and E. N. Saridakis, [arXiv:2511.04613 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv
[69]

Bargueño, Phys

P. Bargueño, Phys. Rev. D104, 088501 (2021)

work page 2021
[70]

R. A. Sussman, C. A. Mantica, L. G. Molinari and S. Ná- jera, [arXiv:2401.10479 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv
[71]

Altas and B

E. Altas and B. Tekin, Phys. Rev. D111, 2 (2025)

work page 2025
[72]

G. G. Luciano, Phys. Lett. B838, 137721 (2023)

work page 2023
[73]

Kodama, Prog

H. Kodama, Prog. Theor. Phys.63, 1217 (1980)

work page 1980
[74]

S. A. Hayward, R. Di Criscienzo, L. Vanzo, M. Nadalini and S. Zerbini, Class. Quant. Grav.26, 062001 (2009)

work page 2009
[75]

R. G. Cai and S. P. Kim, JHEP.0502, 050 (2005)

work page 2005
[76]

P. F. Gonzalez-Diaz and C. L. Siguenza, Nucl. Phys. B 697, 363-386 (2004)

work page 2004
[77]

R. L. Bowers and E. P. T. Liang, Astrophys. J.188, 657-665 (1974)

work page 1974
[78]

V. P. Frolov and A. Zelnikov,Introduction to Black Hole Physics, Oxford Univ. Pr., 2011

work page 2011
[79]

C. A. Mantica and L. G. Molinari, Gen. Rel. Grav.54, 98 (2022)

work page 2022