pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12003 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Generalized Mass-to-Horizon Entropy and Horizon Thermodynamics

Krishna P. B, Priyesh K V, Smeehan S Shameeem, Titus K Mathew

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 05:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords generalized entropyhorizon thermodynamicsapparent horizonFriedmann equationcosmic accelerationthermodynamic stabilitygeneralized second lawFLRW cosmology
0
0 comments X

The pith

A two-parameter generalization of Bekenstein entropy fully accounts for heat exchange at the apparent horizon and derives the Friedmann equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a generalized mass-to-horizon entropy as a two-parameter extension of the standard Bekenstein form, based on the mass-to-horizon relation. Assuming an entropy balance relation, the change in this entropy is shown to account completely for the heat exchanged across the horizon as seen by a nearby observer. The authors then obtain the Friedmann equation from both the Clausius relation and a modified thermodynamic law. Entropy evolution and its higher derivatives are used to argue that the universe reaches a stable maximum-entropy state, while fluctuation analysis confirms finite and stable behavior consistent with the generalized second law.

Core claim

The generalized mass-to-horizon entropy entirely accounts for the heat exchange across the horizon as measured by an observer near the apparent horizon. Its evolution and higher-order derivatives indicate that the universe evolves toward a stable maximum entropy configuration consistent with the generalized second law of thermodynamics. Fluctuation analysis of horizon energy reveals finite and physically stable behavior throughout cosmic evolution, establishing the framework as viable for describing modified cosmological dynamics and the accelerated expansion of the universe.

What carries the argument

The generalized mass-to-horizon entropy, defined as a two-parameter extension of Bekenstein entropy using the mass-to-horizon relation, which carries the derivation of thermodynamic relations and the Friedmann equation at the apparent horizon.

If this is right

  • The Friedmann equation follows directly from the Clausius relation applied to the generalized entropy.
  • The universe approaches a stable maximum-entropy state as required by the generalized second law.
  • Horizon-energy fluctuations remain finite and physically stable at all times.
  • The framework supplies a thermodynamic description of accelerated expansion.
  • Thermodynamic consistency holds when the entropy and its derivatives satisfy maximization conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar two-parameter entropy forms might be applied to other modified-gravity cosmologies to test whether they also yield stable thermodynamics.
  • Precise future measurements of apparent-horizon temperature or entropy production rates could constrain the two free parameters.
  • If the entropy-balance assumption fails in FLRW, the same generalized entropy might still be tested in black-hole or de Sitter settings.

Load-bearing premise

The entropy balance relation is assumed to hold directly for the generalized entropy at the apparent horizon in FLRW cosmology.

What would settle it

A mismatch between the derived Friedmann equation and observed Hubble expansion history, or detection of divergent entropy fluctuations at any epoch, would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

We investigate the cosmological implications of generalized mass-to-horizon entropy, a two-parameter extension of the standard Bekenstein entropy based on the mass-to-horizon relation. Assuming the entropy balance relation, we derive the change in the generalized mass-to-horizon entropy, which entirely accounts for the heat exchange across the horizon as measured by an observer near the apparent horizon. We have then derived the Friedmann equation, using the Clausius relation, and also using modified law of thermodynamics. The thermodynamic consistency of the entropy, is examined through entropy evolution and entropy maximization conditions, where the generalized entropy and its higher-order derivatives indicate that the universe evolves toward a stable maximum entropy configuration consistent with the generalized second law of thermodynamics. In addition, fluctuations in horizon energy are investigated to probe the thermal stability and thermodynamic behavior of the cosmic horizon. The fluctuation analysis reveals finite and physically stable behavior throughout cosmic evolution, supporting the thermodynamic viability of the proposed model. The present work therefore establishes the generalized mass-to-horizon entropy as a viable thermodynamic framework for describing modified cosmological dynamics and also the accelerated expansion of the universe as well.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a two-parameter generalization of the Bekenstein mass-to-horizon entropy for FLRW cosmology. Assuming the entropy balance relation dS = dQ/T holds for an observer near the apparent horizon, it derives the change in generalized entropy, recovers the Friedmann equation via the Clausius relation (and a modified thermodynamic law), verifies consistency with the generalized second law through entropy evolution and maximization conditions, and analyzes fluctuations in horizon energy to conclude that the model exhibits finite, stable thermodynamic behavior supporting cosmic acceleration.

Significance. If the entropy-balance assumption is independently justified rather than posited and the derivation avoids reproducing the input cosmology by construction, the framework supplies a thermodynamic route to modified Friedmann dynamics and late-time acceleration. The explicit entropy-maximization analysis and fluctuation diagnostics constitute concrete, falsifiable checks that strengthen the thermodynamic interpretation of apparent-horizon entropy in cosmology.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Clausius derivation of Friedmann equation): The entropy balance relation is inserted directly into the Clausius relation without a derivation from the two-parameter generalized entropy functional or from the apparent-horizon definition r_A = 1/H. This assumption is load-bearing; the claim that dS_gen 'entirely accounts for the heat exchange' and the subsequent recovery of the Friedmann equation both collapse if the generalization introduces terms that violate exact balance.
  2. [§2] §2 (Definition of generalized entropy): The two free parameters are introduced ad hoc without a first-principles constraint or reduction to a known limit. Their presence allows the entropy-maximization and stability conclusions to be tuned rather than predicted, weakening the claim that the model is thermodynamically viable independently of parameter choice.
  3. [Fluctuation analysis] Fluctuation-analysis section: The reported finite and stable fluctuations throughout cosmic evolution inherit the same un-derived entropy-balance premise. Without an explicit check that the generalized form satisfies dS = dQ/T exactly (including higher-order terms), the stability conclusion is not secured.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'derivations exist' for the entropy change and Friedmann equation but provides no equation numbers or step references, making the logical chain difficult to trace.
  2. [§2] Notation for the two parameters in the generalized entropy functional is introduced without an explicit functional form in the opening sections, complicating assessment of the extension from the standard Bekenstein case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing our response and indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Clausius derivation of Friedmann equation): The entropy balance relation is inserted directly into the Clausius relation without a derivation from the two-parameter generalized entropy functional or from the apparent-horizon definition r_A = 1/H. This assumption is load-bearing; the claim that dS_gen 'entirely accounts for the heat exchange' and the subsequent recovery of the Friedmann equation both collapse if the generalization introduces terms that violate exact balance.

    Authors: We agree that the entropy balance relation dS = dQ/T is introduced as an assumption rather than derived from the generalized entropy functional or the horizon radius definition. This is standard in the apparent-horizon thermodynamics literature for FLRW spacetimes, where the heat flux is identified with the energy flow across the horizon as measured by a comoving observer. The two-parameter form is constructed to preserve this relation by design. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit paragraph in §3 stating the assumption, motivating it from the horizon thermodynamics framework, and clarifying that a first-principles derivation would require additional quantum-gravity input beyond the present phenomenological approach. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§2] §2 (Definition of generalized entropy): The two free parameters are introduced ad hoc without a first-principles constraint or reduction to a known limit. Their presence allows the entropy-maximization and stability conclusions to be tuned rather than predicted, weakening the claim that the model is thermodynamically viable independently of parameter choice.

    Authors: The parameters are introduced phenomenologically to extend the Bekenstein entropy while retaining thermodynamic consistency. The standard Bekenstein case is recovered for specific parameter values that restore the area law. We will revise §2 to include a discussion of the parameter space, deriving constraints from the entropy-maximization and stability conditions, and showing that the viability conclusions hold over a non-trivial range of parameters without fine-tuning. This makes the results parameter-dependent but within physically motivated bounds. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Fluctuation analysis] Fluctuation-analysis section: The reported finite and stable fluctuations throughout cosmic evolution inherit the same un-derived entropy-balance premise. Without an explicit check that the generalized form satisfies dS = dQ/T exactly (including higher-order terms), the stability conclusion is not secured.

    Authors: The fluctuation analysis is performed under the same entropy-balance assumption used throughout the paper. We will revise the fluctuation section to add an explicit verification that the generalized entropy satisfies dS_gen = dQ/T to the linear order employed in the thermodynamic treatment, with a note that higher-order terms lie outside the scope of the present approximation. This will secure the stability conclusion within the framework's stated assumptions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Assumed entropy balance relation forces Friedmann derivation by construction

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract]
    "Assuming the entropy balance relation, we derive the change in the generalized mass-to-horizon entropy, which entirely accounts for the heat exchange across the horizon as measured by an observer near the apparent horizon. We have then derived the Friedmann equation, using the Clausius relation, and also using modified law of thermodynamics."

    The entropy is defined as a two-parameter extension that is assumed to satisfy dS_gen = dQ/T exactly; inserting this into Clausius therefore recovers the Friedmann equation of the background cosmology by construction, rendering the 'derivation' tautological.

full rationale

The paper assumes without derivation that the two-parameter generalized mass-to-horizon entropy satisfies the entropy balance dS = dQ/T near the apparent horizon. This assumption is then inserted into the Clausius relation to recover the Friedmann equation. Because the entropy form is posited to fully account for heat exchange by construction, the thermodynamic derivation reproduces the input FLRW cosmology rather than providing an independent check. Stability and fluctuation conclusions inherit the same premise. No external benchmark or first-principles derivation of the balance relation from the entropy functional is supplied.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two unspecified free parameters in the entropy definition and on the entropy-balance assumption; no new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • two parameters in generalized mass-to-horizon entropy
    Introduced to extend the standard Bekenstein form; specific functional dependence and numerical values not stated in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Entropy balance relation
    Assumed so that the change in generalized entropy accounts for all heat exchange across the apparent horizon.
  • domain assumption Clausius relation holds for cosmological horizons
    Used to obtain the Friedmann equation from the entropy change.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5496 in / 1366 out tokens · 61941 ms · 2026-05-13T05:04:52.599768+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Padmanabhan, A

    T. Padmanabhan, A. Paranjape, Entropy of null surfaces and dynamics of spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 064004. arXiv:gr-qc/0701003, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.064004

  2. [3]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333–2346. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.7.2333

  3. [5]

    S. W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971) 1344–1346. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.1344

  4. [6]

    Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state, Phys

    T. Jacobson, Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 1260–

  5. [7]

    arXiv:gr-qc/9504004, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1260

  6. [8]

    Tsallis, L

    C. Tsallis, L. Cirto, Black hole thermodynamical entropy, The European Physical Journal C 73 (02 2012). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-013-2487-6

  7. [9]

    Sheykhi, Modified Friedmann Equations from Tsallis Entropy, Phys

    A. Sheykhi, Modified Friedmann Equations from Tsallis Entropy, Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 118–126. arXiv:1806.03996, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.08.036

  8. [10]

    Dheepika, H

    M. Dheepika, H. B. V. T., T. K. Mathew, Emergence of cosmic space in Tsallis modified gravity from equilib- rium and non-equilibrium thermodynamic perspective, Phys. Scripta 99 (1) (2024) 015014. arXiv:2211.14039, doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ad1375

  9. [11]

    J. D. Barrow, The Area of a Rough Black Hole, Phys. Lett. B 808 (2020) 135643. arXiv:2004.09444, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135643

  10. [12]

    Sheykhi, Modified cosmology through Barrow entropy, Phys

    A. Sheykhi, Modified cosmology through Barrow entropy, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2) (2023) 023505. arXiv:2210.12525, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.023505

  11. [13]

    V. G. Czinner, H. Iguchi, R´ enyi entropy and the thermodynamic stability of black holes, Physics Letters B 752 (2016) 306–310. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.11.061. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S037026931500917X

  12. [14]

    Ghaffari, A

    S. Ghaffari, A. H. Ziaie, V. B. Bezerra, H. Moradpour, Inflation in the R´ enyi cosmology, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 35 (01) (2019) 1950341. arXiv:1902.10202, doi:10.1142/S0217732319503413

  13. [15]

    Kaniadakis, Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity, Physical Review E 66 (5) (Nov

    G. Kaniadakis, Statistical mechanics in the context of special relativity, Physical Review E 66 (5) (Nov. 2002). doi:10.1103/physreve.66.056125. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.66.056125

  14. [16]

    Sheykhi, Corrections to Friedmann equations inspired by Kaniadakis entropy, Phys

    A. Sheykhi, Corrections to Friedmann equations inspired by Kaniadakis entropy, Phys. Lett. B 850 (2024) 138495. arXiv:2302.13012, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.138495

  15. [17]

    Lymperis, S

    A. Lymperis, S. Basilakos, E. N. Saridakis, Modified cosmology through Kaniadakis horizon entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (11) (2021) 1037. arXiv:2108.12366, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09852-9

  16. [18]

    Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights, Rept

    T. Padmanabhan, Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New insights, Rept. Prog. Phys. 73 (2010) 046901. arXiv:0911.5004, doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/4/046901. 15

  17. [19]

    S. Ali, M. H. Waheed, M. I. Asjad, K. A. Khan, T. Sitthiwirattham, C. Promsakon, The Sharma–Mittal Model’s Implications on FRW Universe in Chern–Simons Gravity, Universe 7 (11) (2021) 428. doi:10.3390/universe7110428

  18. [20]

    Naeem, A

    M. Naeem, A. Bibi, Correction to the Friedmann equation with Sharma–Mittal entropy: A new perspective on cosmology, Annals Phys. 462 (2024) 169618. arXiv:2308.02936, doi:10.1016/j.aop.2024.169618

  19. [21]

    R.-G. Cai, S. P. Kim, First law of thermodynamics and Friedmann equations of Friedmann-Robertson-Walker universe, JHEP 02 (2005) 050. arXiv:hep-th/0501055, doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/02/050

  20. [22]

    Akbar, R.-G

    M. Akbar, R.-G. Cai, Thermodynamic Behavior of Friedmann Equations at Apparent Horizon of FRW Universe, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 084003. arXiv:hep-th/0609128, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.084003

  21. [23]

    Basilakos, A

    S. Basilakos, A. Lymperis, M. Petronikolou, E. N. Saridakis, Modified cosmology through spacetime thermo- dynamics and generalized mass-to-horizon entropy, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (11) (2025) 1244. arXiv:2503.24355, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14971-8

  22. [24]

    E. P. Verlinde, Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe, SciPost Phys. 2 (3) (2017) 016. arXiv:1611.02269, doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.2.3.016

  23. [25]

    S. W. Hawking, Particle Creation by Black Holes, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975) 199–220, [Erratum: Com- mun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]. doi:10.1007/BF02345020

  24. [26]

    Friedmann, On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space, Z

    A. Friedmann, On the Possibility of a world with constant negative curvature of space, Z. Phys. 21 (1924) 326–332. doi:10.1007/BF01328280

  25. [27]

    Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A 47 (1927) 49–59. doi:10.1007/s10714-013-1548-3

  26. [28]

    Eling, R

    C. Eling, R. Guedens, T. Jacobson, Non-equilibrium thermodynamics of spacetime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 121301. arXiv:gr-qc/0602001, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.121301

  27. [29]

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking, Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2738–2751. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2738

  28. [30]

    Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005

    V. Mukhanov, Physical Foundations of Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Oxford, 2005. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511790553

  29. [31]

    Sheykhi, Emergence of the cosmic space inspired by mass-to-horizon entropy, Phys

    A. Sheykhi, Emergence of the cosmic space inspired by mass-to-horizon entropy, Phys. Lett. B 872 (2026) 140103. arXiv:2512.18054, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2025.140103

  30. [32]

    S. A. Hayward, S. Mukohyama, M. C. Ashworth, Dynamic black hole entropy, Phys. Lett. A 256 (1999) 347–350. arXiv:gr-qc/9810006, doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(99)00225-X

  31. [33]

    Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev

    S. Weinberg, The Cosmological Constant Problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 1–23. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.61.1. 16

  32. [34]

    Pavon, N

    D. Pavon, N. Radicella, Does the entropy of the Universe tend to a maximum?, Gen. Rel. Grav. 45 (2013) 63–68. arXiv:1209.3004, doi:10.1007/s10714-012-1457-x

  33. [35]

    P. B. Krishna, T. K. Mathew, Holographic equipartition and the maximization of entropy, Phys. Rev. D 96 (6) (2017) 063513. arXiv:1702.02787, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.063513

  34. [36]

    Izquierdo, D

    G. Izquierdo, D. Pav´ on, The generalized second law in phantom dominated universes in the presence of black holes, Physics Letters B 639 (1) (2006) 1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2006.05.082. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S0370269306007015

  35. [37]

    V. S. Namboothiri, K. P.B., A. P. S, T. K. Mathew, Evolution of fluctuations in horizon energy and its dependence on the degrees of freedom, Phys. Dark Univ. 51 (2026) 102223. arXiv:2408.09771, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2026.102223

  36. [38]

    R. H. Brandenberger, A. Nayeri, S. P. Patil, C. Vafa, String gas cosmology and structure formation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22 (2007) 3621–3642. arXiv:hep-th/0608121, doi:10.1142/S0217751X07037159

  37. [39]

    Komatsu, Energy stored on a cosmological horizon and its thermodynamic fluctuations in holographic equipar- tition law, Phys

    N. Komatsu, Energy stored on a cosmological horizon and its thermodynamic fluctuations in holographic equipar- tition law, Phys. Rev. D 105 (4) (2022) 043534. arXiv:2112.06359, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.043534

  38. [40]

    Lynden-Bell, Negative specific heat in astronomy, physics and chemistry, Physica A 263 (1999) 293–304

    D. Lynden-Bell, Negative specific heat in astronomy, physics and chemistry, Physica A 263 (1999) 293–304. arXiv:cond-mat/9812172, doi:10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00518-4

  39. [41]

    L. Velazquez, Remarks about the thermodynamics of astrophysical systems in mutual interaction and related notions, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016 (3) (2016) 033105. doi:10.1088/1742- 5468/2016/03/033105. URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/03/033105

  40. [42]

    Padmanabhan, Equipartition energy, Noether energy and boundary term in gravitational action, Gen

    T. Padmanabhan, Equipartition energy, Noether energy and boundary term in gravitational action, Gen. Rel. Grav. 44 (2012) 2681–2686. arXiv:1205.5683, doi:10.1007/s10714-012-1418-4

  41. [43]

    Muhsinath, H

    M. Muhsinath, H. Basari V. T., T. K. Mathew, Modified expansion law with Kodama–Hayward temperature for the horizon, Gen. Rel. Grav. 55 (2) (2023) 43. arXiv:2211.01739, doi:10.1007/s10714-023-03091-x

  42. [44]

    Padmanabhan, Emergence and Expansion of Cosmic Space as due to the Quest for Holographic Equipartition (6 2012)

    T. Padmanabhan, Emergence and Expansion of Cosmic Space as due to the Quest for Holographic Equipartition (6 2012). arXiv:1206.4916

  43. [45]

    H. B. V. T., K. P. B., P. K. V., T. K. Mathew, Emergence of space and expansion of Universe, Class. Quant. Grav. 39 (11) (2022) 115012. arXiv:1905.03552, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac6a39

  44. [46]

    G. G. Luciano, Modified cosmology through generalized mass-to-horizon entropy: Implications for struc- ture growth and primordial gravitational waves, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 50 (2026) 100487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2025.100487. URLhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii /S2214404825001685

  45. [47]

    P. M. Garnavich, et al., Constraints on cosmological models from Hubble Space Telescope observations of high z supernovae, Astrophys. J. Lett. 493 (1998) L53–57. arXiv:astro-ph/9710123, doi:10.1086/311140. 17

  46. [48]

    B. P. Schmidt, et al., The High Z supernova search: Measuring cosmic deceleration and global curvature of the universe using type Ia supernovae, Astrophys. J. 507 (1998) 46–63. arXiv:astro-ph/9805200, doi:10.1086/306308

  47. [49]

    A. G. Riess, et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astron. J. 116 (1998) 1009–1038. arXiv:astro-ph/9805201, doi:10.1086/300499

  48. [50]

    P. M. Garnavich, et al., Supernova limits on the cosmic equation of state, Astrophys. J. 509 (1998) 74–79. arXiv:astro-ph/9806396, doi:10.1086/306495

  49. [51]

    Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of the cosmological parameters Omega and Lambda from the first 7 super- novae at z>=0.35, Astrophys

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of the cosmological parameters Omega and Lambda from the first 7 super- novae at z>=0.35, Astrophys. J. 483 (1997) 565. arXiv:astro-ph/9608192, doi:10.1086/304265

  50. [52]

    Perlmutter, et al., Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the Universe and its cosmological implications, Nature 391 (1998) 51–54

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Discovery of a supernova explosion at half the age of the Universe and its cosmological implications, Nature 391 (1998) 51–54. arXiv:astro-ph/9712212, doi:10.1038/34124

  51. [53]

    Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of Ω and Λ from 42 High Redshift Supernovae, Astrophys. J. 517 (1999) 565–586. arXiv:astro-ph/9812133, doi:10.1086/307221

  52. [54]

    Y. Gong, A. Wang, Friedmann equations and thermodynamics of apparent horizons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 211301. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.211301. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.21 1301. 18