arxiv: 2605.12101 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Mechanical detection of sub-band mobilities of two-dimensional electron gas on reduced SrTiO₃(001) surface

Akash Gupta , Marcin Kisiel , Remy Pawlak , Ernst Meyer

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords two-dimensional electron gasSrTiO3atomic force microscopydissipation spectroscopyquantum capacitancesub-band mobilityKohler's ruleoxide electronics

0 comments

The pith

Dissipation spectroscopy with atomic force microscopy extracts mobilities of sub-bands in strontium titanate's two-dimensional electron gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows how low-temperature atomic force microscopy combined with scanning tunnelling spectroscopy can probe the force and dissipation responses of a mechanical oscillator near the 2DEG on reduced SrTiO3. Bias-dependent dissipation peaks are observed and linked to local electrostatic gating that redistributes charge among the energy sub-bands of the 2DEG. These peaks are explained by changes in quantum capacitance as the carrier density is varied by the electric field. When a magnetic field is applied the peaks follow Kohler's rule, which is used to determine the mobility of carriers in each individual sub-band. This approach matters because it offers a non-invasive method to study energy losses and charge dynamics in materials relevant to oxide electronics and spintronics.

Core claim

Dissipation peaks in the AFM signal on the reduced SrTiO3(001) surface arise from variations in quantum capacitance associated with the filling of 2DEG sub-bands under local electrostatic gating. Application of a magnetic field causes these dissipation peaks to obey Kohler's rule, permitting the extraction of the carrier mobility within each sub-band.

What carries the argument

The quantum capacitance of the 2DEG sub-bands, whose variations with bias produce the dissipation peaks, and the application of Kohler's rule to these peaks under magnetic field to extract per-sub-band mobilities.

If this is right

This establishes a non-invasive AFM-based methodology for quantifying energy losses in quantum oxides.
It provides new insights into charge dynamics relevant for spintronic applications.
Sub-band specific carrier mobilities can be determined from the magnetic field dependence of dissipation without requiring direct electrical contacts to the sample.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could be extended to map spatial variations in sub-band mobilities across the surface at the nanoscale.
Similar dissipation features might appear in other 2D electron systems at oxide interfaces, offering a general tool for studying quantum capacitance effects.
If the technique is integrated with device structures, it might allow monitoring of sub-band occupation during operation.

Load-bearing premise

The dissipation peaks are produced exclusively by quantum capacitance changes from sub-band filling, without substantial contributions from other energy dissipation channels, and that Kohler's rule describes the magnetic field dependence of the dissipation signal without needing additional corrections specific to this system.

What would settle it

If the positions or heights of the dissipation peaks do not vary with magnetic field strength in the manner predicted by Kohler's rule for each bias voltage, or if the mobilities calculated from the peaks disagree with those measured by conventional transport experiments on the same material, the explanation in terms of sub-band mobilities would be falsified.

read the original abstract

The two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) in reduced strontium titanate offers a versatile platform for oxide electronics, yet its dissipation mechanisms under field driven charge fluctuations remain poorly understood. Here, we combine low-temperature atomic force microscopy with scanning tunnelling spectroscopy to probe the force and dissipation responses of a mechanical oscillator interacting with the STO 2DEG. The observation of Rydberg like image potential states by tunnelling experiments confirm the 2DEG formation, while dissipation spectroscopy reveals bias-dependent peaks linked to local electrostatic gating and charge redistribution within the 2DEG energy sub-bands. These features are quantitatively explained by variations in quantum capacitance as carrier density is tuned by electric fields. Under magnetic fields, dissipation peaks obey the Kohler's rule, allowing extraction of carrier mobilities in each sub-band. Our results establish a non-invasive AFM - based methodology for quantifying energy losses in quantum oxides, providing new insights into charge dynamics relevant for spintronic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper offers a fresh AFM-based route to sub-band mobilities in the STO 2DEG by mapping bias-dependent dissipation peaks to quantum capacitance and then to Kohler's rule under B, but the required direct link between mechanical loss and magnetoconductivity is asserted rather than derived or calibrated.

read the letter

The central point is that the authors use low-temperature AFM dissipation spectroscopy on reduced SrTiO3(001) to track bias-tuned peaks they tie to sub-band filling, then apply Kohler's rule in magnetic field to extract separate mobilities for those sub-bands. This is presented as a non-contact method for charge dynamics in oxide 2DEGs. They also use STS to confirm the 2DEG via Rydberg-like image potential states, which is a clean supporting step. The combination of mechanical dissipation with field dependence for mobility resolution is new for this system and could interest groups working on oxide interfaces or scanning-probe probes of quantum transport. The experimental design looks careful, with clear qualitative observations of how dissipation changes with bias and field. The soft spots sit in the quantitative step. The abstract states that the peaks are quantitatively explained by quantum capacitance and that mobilities follow from Kohler's rule, yet no fitting details, error bars, or exclusion of other loss channels appear in the provided summary. More importantly, Kohler's rule describes magnetoresistivity scaling; turning dissipation amplitude or force gradient into a conductivity signal that obeys it directly requires a model of the tip-2DEG interaction. No such model or validation is referenced, so the extracted values remain tied to an untested assumption that dissipation tracks longitudinal conductivity without additive contributions from dielectric or tip-induced terms. If that mapping holds only under specific conditions, the per-sub-band mobilities become model-dependent. This work is aimed at experimentalists in oxide electronics and AFM users studying 2DEGs. A reader already familiar with STO interfaces or magnetotransport rules would get the most from it and could test the method themselves. The paper shows honest engagement with the literature on quantum capacitance and Kohler's rule, so it is worth a serious referee even if revisions on the dissipation analysis are likely. I would send it out for peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the 2DEG formed on reduced SrTiO3(001) using low-temperature AFM dissipation spectroscopy combined with STS. It reports bias-dependent dissipation peaks attributed to local electrostatic gating and charge redistribution within 2DEG sub-bands, which are claimed to be quantitatively explained by variations in quantum capacitance. STS confirms 2DEG formation via Rydberg-like image potential states. Under perpendicular magnetic fields, the dissipation peaks are stated to obey Kohler's rule, permitting extraction of per-sub-band carrier mobilities. The work positions this AFM-based approach as a non-invasive method for quantifying energy losses and charge dynamics in quantum oxides.

Significance. If the quantitative link to quantum capacitance and the direct applicability of Kohler's rule to extract mobilities are validated, the results would provide a valuable local, contact-free probe of sub-band transport and dissipation in oxide 2DEGs. This could advance understanding of field-tunable charge dynamics relevant to oxide electronics and spintronics, complementing conventional transport measurements.

major comments (2)

[Results section on bias-dependent dissipation and magnetic-field dependence] The central claim that dissipation peaks are quantitatively explained by quantum capacitance (and that mobilities are extracted via Kohler's rule) lacks any derivation or equivalent-circuit model relating the cantilever's mechanical dissipation (force gradient or amplitude damping) to the 2DEG longitudinal conductivity under bias and B. This mapping is load-bearing for both the capacitance explanation and the mobility values but is not justified from first principles or calibrated against known conductivity data.
[Abstract and dissipation-spectroscopy results] No data, error bars, fitting procedures, or exclusion criteria are provided to support the assertion that peaks arise exclusively from quantum-capacitance changes tied to sub-band filling, with no significant contributions from dielectric relaxation, tip-induced scattering, or other loss channels. This leaves the quantitative explanation unverifiable and the weakest assumption untested.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that peaks 'are quantitatively explained' and 'obey the Kohler's rule' but does not reference specific figures, tables, or extracted mobility values, reducing clarity.
[Theory or methods section] Notation for sub-band indices, quantum capacitance C_q, and the precise form of Kohler's rule applied to dissipation should be defined explicitly with equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting these important points regarding the theoretical foundation and supporting evidence for our claims. We provide point-by-point responses below and will incorporate revisions to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Results section on bias-dependent dissipation and magnetic-field dependence] The central claim that dissipation peaks are quantitatively explained by quantum capacitance (and that mobilities are extracted via Kohler's rule) lacks any derivation or equivalent-circuit model relating the cantilever's mechanical dissipation (force gradient or amplitude damping) to the 2DEG longitudinal conductivity under bias and B. This mapping is load-bearing for both the capacitance explanation and the mobility values but is not justified from first principles or calibrated against known conductivity data.

Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation of the mapping from cantilever dissipation to 2DEG conductivity would improve the rigor of the central claims. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection deriving the electrostatic coupling between the tip and the 2DEG, showing how bias-driven changes in quantum capacitance modulate the force gradient and thereby the observed mechanical dissipation. The derivation will incorporate the longitudinal conductivity under perpendicular B via the magnetoresistance that underlies Kohler's rule, and we will reference the relevant equivalent-circuit elements. Where possible we will note consistency with existing transport literature on STO 2DEGs. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract and dissipation-spectroscopy results] No data, error bars, fitting procedures, or exclusion criteria are provided to support the assertion that peaks arise exclusively from quantum-capacitance changes tied to sub-band filling, with no significant contributions from dielectric relaxation, tip-induced scattering, or other loss channels. This leaves the quantitative explanation unverifiable and the weakest assumption untested.

Authors: The manuscript already presents bias-dependent dissipation spectra together with STS confirmation of the sub-band structure. To address the concern we will expand the supplementary material with (i) error bars on peak positions and amplitudes obtained from repeated measurements, (ii) the fitting routines used to extract the peaks (including functional form and goodness-of-fit metrics), and (iii) a quantitative discussion of alternative dissipation channels. In particular we will compare the observed field dependence to the expected dielectric loss of STO and note that tip-induced scattering would not reproduce the Kohler's-rule scaling reported for the peaks. Any additional control data that can be obtained will be included. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on external standards

full rationale

The paper observes bias-dependent dissipation peaks, attributes them to quantum capacitance variations during sub-band filling (a standard 2DEG concept), and states that the peaks obey Kohler's rule under magnetic field to extract per-sub-band mobilities. No equation or section defines a quantity in terms of itself, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or reduces the central result to a self-citation chain. Kohler's rule and quantum capacitance are invoked as established external relations rather than derived internally or smuggled via author-overlapping citations. The mapping from dissipation to conductivity is presented as an application of known physics, not a self-referential construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard condensed-matter assumptions about 2DEG formation, image-potential states, and transport rules rather than new postulates; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Kohler's rule governs the magnetic-field dependence of the observed dissipation peaks
Invoked to convert peak positions or amplitudes into sub-band mobilities.
domain assumption Bias-dependent dissipation arises from quantum-capacitance variations due to sub-band charge redistribution
Used to assign peaks to specific sub-bands and to claim quantitative explanation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5477 in / 1270 out tokens · 84342 ms · 2026-05-13T04:37:15.097527+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

dissipation peaks obey the Kohler’s rule, allowing extraction of carrier mobilities in each sub-band... Δf_n(B)≈Δf_n(B=0)·(1−3/2 μ_n² B²)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean J_uniquely_calibrated_via_higher_derivative unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

C_Q = m* e² / π ℏ² ... modeled by a Heaviside function whose step positions ... derive from the energy of the 2DEG sub-bands

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

[1]

M¨ uller, K. A. & Burkard, H. Srtio 3: An intrinsic quantum paraelectric below 4 k. Phys. Rev. B19(7), 3593–3602 (1979). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevB.19.3593

work page 1979
[2]

& Sakudo, T

Uwe, H. & Sakudo, T. Stress-induced ferroelectricity and soft phonon modes in srtio 3. Phys. Rev. B13(1), 271–286 (1976). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.271 . Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Mechanical dissipation near STO23

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.13.271 1976
[3]

& Kitamura, T

Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Sahoo, M., Shimada, T. & Kitamura, T. Mechan- ical control of magnetism in oxygen deficient perovskite SrTiO 3. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.17(40), 27136–27144 (2015). https://doi.org/ 10.1039/C5CP04310G

work page doi:10.1039/c5cp04310g 2015
[4]

Fleury, P. A. & Worlock, J. M. Electric-field-induced raman scattering in srtio3 and ktao 3. Phys. Rev.174(2), 613–623 (1968). https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRev.174.613

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.174.613 1968
[5]

& M¨ uller, K

Bickel, N., Schmidt, G., Heinz, K. & M¨ uller, K. Ferroelectric relaxation of the srtio 3(100) surface. Phys. Rev. Lett.62(17), 2009–2011 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2009

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.62.2009 2009
[6]

Santander-Syro, A. F. et al. Two-dimensional electron gas with universal subbands at the surface of SrTiO3. Nature469(7329), 189–193 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09720

work page doi:10.1038/nature09720 2011
[7]

Santander-Syro, A. F. et al. Giant spin splitting of the two-dimensional electron gas at the surface of SrTiO3. Nat. Mater.13(12), 1085–1090 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4107

work page doi:10.1038/nmat4107 2014
[8]

Duality and degeneracy lifting in two-dimensional electron liquids on srtio3(001)

Sokolovi´ c, I.et al. Duality and degeneracy lifting in two-dimensional electron liquids on srtio3(001). Nat. Commun.16(1), 4594 (2025). https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59258-4

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59258-4 2025
[9]

Meevasana, W. et al. Creation and control of a two-dimensional electron liquid at the bare srtio3 surface. Nat. Mater.10(2), 114–118 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2943

work page doi:10.1038/nmat2943 2011
[10]

Plumb, N. C. et al. Mixed dimensionality of confined conducting electrons in the surface region of srtio3. Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 086801 (2014). https: Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 24Mechanical dissipation near STO //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.086801

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.086801 2014
[11]

Ohta, H. et al. Giant thermoelectric Seebeck coefficient of a two- dimensional electron gas in SrTiO3. Nat. Mater.6(2), 129–134 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1821

work page doi:10.1038/nmat1821 2007
[12]

Annadi, A. et al. Anisotropic two-dimensional electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 (110) interface. Nat. Commun.4(1), 1838 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2804

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms2804 2013
[13]

& Hwang, H

Ohtomo, A. & Hwang, H. Y. A high-mobility electron gas at the LaAlO3/SrTiO3 heterointerface. Nature427(6973), 423–426 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02308

work page doi:10.1038/nature02308 2004
[14]

Taniuchi, T. et al. Imaging of room-temperature ferromagnetic nano- domains at the surface of a non-magnetic oxide. Nat. Commun.7(1), 11781 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11781

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms11781 2016
[15]

Coey, J. M. D., Venkatesan, M. & Stamenov, P. Surface magnetism of strontium titanate. J. Phys. Cond. Matt.28(48), 485001 (2016). URL https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/48/485001. https://doi. org/10.1088/0953-8984/28/48/485001

work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/28/48/485001 2016
[16]

& Kopp, T

Pavlenko, N. & Kopp, T. Magnetically Ordered State at Cor- related Oxide Interfaces: The Role of Random Oxygen Defects. Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism26(4), 1175–1178 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-012-2045-8

work page doi:10.1007/s10948-012-2045-8 2013
[17]

F., Hosler, W

Schooley, J. F., Hosler, W. R. & Cohen, M. L. Superconductivity in Semiconducting SrTi O 3. Phys. Rev. Lett.12(17), 474–475 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.12.474 . Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Mechanical dissipation near STO25

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.12.474 1964
[19]

Caviglia, A. D. et al. Tunable rashba spin-orbit interaction at oxide inter- faces. Phys. Rev. Lett.104(12), 126803 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.104.126803

work page 2010
[20]

Large modulation of the shubnikov-de haas oscillations by the rashba interaction at the laalo3/srtio3 interface

Fˆ ete, A.et al. Large modulation of the shubnikov-de haas oscillations by the rashba interaction at the laalo3/srtio3 interface. New Jour. Phys. 16(11), 112002 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/ 112002

work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/16/11/ 2014
[21]

Li, X. et al. Terahertz field-induced ferroelectricity in quantum paraelec- tric srtio3. Science364(6445), 1079–1082 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.aaw4913

work page 2019
[22]

Cen, C. et al. Nanoscale control of an interfacial metal–insulator transition at room temperature. Nat. Mater.7(4), 298–302 (2008). https://doi. org/10.1038/nmat2136

work page doi:10.1038/nmat2136 2008
[23]

& Levy, J

Cen, C., Thiel, S., Mannhart, J. & Levy, J. Oxide Nanoelectronics on Demand. Science323(5917), 1026–1030 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.1168294

work page 2009
[24]

& Diebold, U

Gerhold, S., Wang, Z., Schmid, M. & Diebold, U. Stoichiometry-driven switching between surface reconstructions on srtio3(001). Surf. Sci.621, L1–L4 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2013.10.015

work page doi:10.1016/j.susc.2013.10.015 2014
[25]

Dagdeviren, O. E. et al. Surface phase, morphology, and charge distribution transitions on vacuum and ambient annealed Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 26Mechanical dissipation near STO $\mathrm{SrTi}{\mathrm{O}} {3}$(100). Phys. Rev. B93(19), 195303 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195303, publisher: American Physical Society

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.93.195303 2021
[26]

Tanaka, H., Matsumoto, T., Tomoji Kawai, T. K. & Shichio Kawai, S. K. Surface Structure and Electronic Property of Reduced SrTiO 3 (100) Surface Observed by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy/Spectroscopy. Japan. Jour. Appl. Phys.32(3S), 1405 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1143/ JJAP.32.1405

work page 1993
[27]

Kisiel, M. et al. Mechanical dissipation from charge and spin transitions in oxygen-deficient SrTiO3 surfaces. Nat. Commun.9(1), 2946 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05392-1

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05392-1 2018
[28]

Brovko, O. O. & Tosatti, E. Controlling the magnetism of oxygen surface vacancies in srtio3 through charging. Phys. Rev. Mater.1, 044405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.044405

work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.1.044405 2017
[29]

Di Capua, R. et al. Observation of a two-dimensional electron gas at the surface of annealed srtio 3 single crystals by scanning tunneling spec- troscopy. Phys. Rev. B86, 155425 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevB.86.155425

work page 2012
[30]

Guedes, E. B. et al. Universal Structural Influence on the 2D Electron Gas at SrTiO3 Surfaces. Adv. Sci.8(22), 2100602 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202100602, eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/advs.202100602

work page doi:10.1002/advs.202100602 2021
[31]

Altmeyer, M. et al. Magnetism, spin texture, and in-gap states: Atomic specialization at the surface of oxygen-deficient srtio 3. Phys. Rev. Lett. Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Mechanical dissipation near STO27 116, 157203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.157203

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.157203 2021
[32]

H¨ utner, J. I.et al. Stoichiometric reconstruction of the al2o3(0001) sur- face. Science385(6714), 1241–1244 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.adq4744

work page 2024
[33]

& Setvin, M

Sokolovi´ c, I., Schmid, M., Diebold, U. & Setvin, M. Incipient ferroelec- tricity: A route towards bulk-terminated srtio 3. Phys. Rev. Mater.3(3), 034407 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials. 3.034407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.034407

work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials 2019
[34]

Kisiel, M. et al. Noncontact dissipation reveals critical central peak in SrTiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett.115(4), 046101 (2015). https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.115.046101, arXiv:1506.01306 [cond-mat]

work page arXiv 2015
[35]

Stomp, R. et al. Detection of Single-Electron Charging in an Indi- vidual InAs Quantum Dot by Noncontact Atomic-Force Microscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett.94(5), 056802 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.94.056802

work page 2005
[36]

Gross, L. et al. Measuring the Charge State of an Adatom with Non- contact Atomic Force Microscopy. Science324(5933), 1428–1431 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172273

work page doi:10.1126/science.1172273 2009
[37]

S., Schmid, M

Setvin, M., Hulva, J., Parkinson, G. S., Schmid, M. & Diebold, U. Electron transfer between anatase tio2 and an o2 molecule directly observed by atomic force microscopy. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.114(13), E2556–E2562 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618723114

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1618723114 2017
[38]

Koci´ c, N.et al. Periodic Charging of Individual Molecules Coupled to the Motion of an Atomic Force Microscopy Tip.Nano Lett.15(7), 4406–4411 Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 28Mechanical dissipation near STO (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00711

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00711 2021
[39]

Fatayer, S. et al. Molecular structure elucidation with charge-state con- trol. Science365(6449), 142–145 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1126/ science.aax5895. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax5895

work page doi:10.1126/science.aax5895 2019
[40]

Li, C. et al. Strong signature of electron-vibration coupling in molecules on ag(111) triggered by tip-gated discharging. Nat. Comm.14(1), 5956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41601-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41601-2 2023
[41]

Scheuerer, P., Patera, L. L. & Repp, J. Manipulating and probing the distribution of excess electrons in an electrically isolated self-assembled molecular structure. Nano Lett.20(3), 1839–1845 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05063. https://doi.org/10.1021/ acs.nanolett.9b05063

work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b05063 2020
[42]

D’Astolfo, P. et al. Energy Dissipation from Confined States in Nanoporous Molecular Networks. ACS Nano16(10), 16314–16321 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.2c05333, publisher: American Chemical Society

work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c05333 2022
[43]

Ollier, A. et al. Energy dissipation on magic angle twisted bilayer graphene. Comm. Phys.6(1), 344 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s42005-023-01441-4

work page 2023
[44]

Image potential surface states

Dose, V. Image potential surface states. Phys. Scrip.36(4), 669–672 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/36/4/009

work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/36/4/009 1987
[45]

A., Diekh¨ oner, L., Vogelgesang, R

Wahl, P., Schneider, M. A., Diekh¨ oner, L., Vogelgesang, R. & Kern, K. Quantum Coherence of Image-Potential States. Phys. Rev. Lett.91(10), 106802 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.106802 . Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template Mechanical dissipation near STO29

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.106802 2003
[46]

& Meyer, E

Yildiz, D., Kisiel, M., Gysin, U., G¨ url¨ u, O. & Meyer, E. Mechanical dissipation via image potential states on a topological insulator sur- face. Nat. Mater.18(11), 1201–1206 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41563-019-0492-3

work page 2019
[47]

Chahib, O. et al. Probing charge redistribution at the interface of self- assembled cyclo-P5 pentamers on Ag(111). Nat. Commun.15(1), 6542 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50862-4

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-50862-4 2024
[48]

He, H.-T. et al. Impurity Effect on Weak Antilocalization in the Topo- logical Insulator Bi 2 Te 3. Phys. Rev. Lett..106(16), 166805 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.166805

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.166805 2011
[49]

& Fukutani, K

Takeyasu, K., Fukada, K., Matsumoto, M. & Fukutani, K. Control of the surface electronic structure of SrTiO 3 (001) by modulation of the den- sity of oxygen vacancies. J. Phys.: Cond. Matter25(16), 162202 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/25/16/162202

work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/25/16/162202 2013
[50]

& Weissbard, W

Chung, Y.-W. & Weissbard, W. B. Surface spectroscopy studies of the srtio 3 (100) surface and the platinum-srtio 3 (100) interface. Phys. Rev. B20(8), 3456–3461 (1979). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.20.3456. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.20.3456

work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.20.3456 1979
[51]

Quantum capacitance devices

Luryi, S. Quantum capacitance devices. Appl. Phys. Lett.52(6), 501–503 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.99649

work page doi:10.1063/1.99649 1988
[52]

Kisiel, M. et al. Suppression of electronic friction on Nb films in the superconducting state. Nat. Mater.10(2), 119–122 (2011). https://doi. org/10.1038/nmat2936 . Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 30Mechanical dissipation near STO

work page doi:10.1038/nmat2936 2011
[53]

Sader, J. E. & Jarvis, S. P. Accurate formulas for interaction force and energy in frequency modulation force spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 84(10), 1801–1803 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1667267

work page doi:10.1063/1.1667267 2004
[54]

I., Persson, B

Volokitin, A. I., Persson, B. N. J. & Ueba, H. Giant enhancement of non- contact friction between closely spaced bodies by dielectric films and two- dimensional systems. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 104(1), 96–110 (2007). URL http://link.springer.com/10.1134/ S1063776107010116. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063776107010116

work page doi:10.1134/s1063776107010116 2007
[55]

Kim, S. et al. Quantum electron liquid and its possible phase tran- sition. Nature Materials21(11), 1269–1274 (2022). URL https:// www.nature.com/articles/s41563-022-01353-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41563-022-01353-8

work page 2022
[56]

King, P. D. C. et al. Quasiparticle dynamics and spin–orbital texture of the SrTiO3 two-dimensional electron gas. Nat. Commun.5(1), 3414 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4414

work page doi:10.1038/ncomms4414 2014
[57]

Sanden, M. C. M. V. D., Heijden, R. W. V. D., Waele, A. T. A. M. D. & Gijsman, H. M. Quantum Magnetoconductance of the Two-Dimensional Electron Gas on a Liquid Helium Surface. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics26(S3-1), 749 (1987). URL https: //iopscience.iop.org/article/10.7567/JJAPS.26S3.749. https://doi.org/ 10.7567/JJAPS.26S3.749

work page doi:10.7567/jjaps.26s3.749 1987
[58]

Giessibl, F. J. The qPlus sensor, a powerful core for the atomic force microscope. Rev. Sci. Instr.90(1), 011101 (2019). https://doi.org/10. 1063/1.5052264

work page 2019