pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12113 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌀 gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Quasinormal Spectra of Fields of Various Spin in Asymptotically de Sitter Black Holes within Generalized Proca Theory

Milena Skvortsova

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc
keywords quasinormal modesgeneralized Proca theoryde Sitter black holesscalar perturbationselectromagnetic perturbationsDirac fieldsstrong cosmic censorshipgrey-body factors
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scalar perturbations on Proca-hairy de Sitter black holes respond most strongly to the hair parameter, with damping rates falling as the three-horizon regime is approached.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines massless scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations around asymptotically de Sitter black holes that carry primary hair from generalized Proca theory. These backgrounds include an effective cosmological term that changes the horizon structure and static patch size. The authors derive the master equations for each spin sector and extract the quasinormal spectra with Padé-improved WKB and time-domain Prony methods. They find that the scalar sector, especially the ℓ=0 mode, is the most sensitive to the Proca parameters. A sympathetic reader would care because the decay rates govern late-time stability and the transmission of information across horizons in these modified spacetimes.

Core claim

On the fixed hairy asymptotically de Sitter background generated by generalized Proca theory, the master equations for massless scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations yield quasinormal spectra in which the scalar ℓ=0 mode exhibits the greatest sensitivity to metric deformations; increasing the Proca-hair parameter Q weakens the damping as the charged three-horizon regime is approached, β hardens the spectrum in the (α, β) scan, and increasing λ and c1 produces the strongest overall softening; for the neutral scalar ℓ=1 mode the time-domain Prony extraction agrees excellently with WKB results and resolves both the Schwarzschild-like black-hole branch and the de Sitter branch.

What carries the argument

Master equations for scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations on the fixed Proca-hairy de Sitter metric, solved by Padé-improved WKB approximation supplemented by characteristic time-domain integration and Prony extraction.

If this is right

  • Increasing the Proca-hair parameter Q reduces the damping of scalar modes as the three-horizon configuration is approached.
  • The parameter β increases the frequencies and damping rates across the scanned range.
  • Larger values of λ and c1 produce the strongest overall reduction in frequency and damping.
  • The exact empty-de Sitter limit carries implications for the strong cosmic censorship conjecture.
  • The computed quasinormal frequencies provide input for grey-body factor calculations in these spacetimes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The clear separation of black-hole and de Sitter branches in the ℓ=1 scalar mode offers a route to distinguish local horizon effects from global cosmological contributions in perturbation spectra.
  • The parameter-dependent softening or hardening trends could be checked against ringdown signals from future gravitational-wave detectors to place bounds on Proca hair.
  • The same numerical pipeline could be applied to rotating or higher-spin fields to test whether the scalar sensitivity pattern persists across the full perturbation spectrum.

Load-bearing premise

The background metric is taken as a fixed hairy solution of generalized Proca theory whose parameters are treated as given constants.

What would settle it

A high-precision time-domain integration or higher-order WKB calculation of the ℓ=0 scalar quasinormal frequency at a value of Q close to the three-horizon limit that shows increasing rather than decreasing damping would contradict the reported trend.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12113 by Milena Skvortsova.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Real parts of the fundamental quasinormal frequencies for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Damping rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Real parts of the fundamental quasinormal frequencies for the dense [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Damping rates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study massless scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac perturbations of asymptotically de Sitter black holes in generalized Proca theory. These geometries are especially interesting because the Proca sector generates both a primary-hair parameter and an effective cosmological term $\Lambda_{\rm eff}$, thereby reshaping the horizon structure and the size of the static patch. Working on this common hairy background, we derive the master equations for the three spin sectors and analyze their quasinormal spectra by means of Pad\'e-improved WKB calculations supplemented by characteristic time-domain integration. We show that the scalar sector, especially the $\ell=0$ mode, is the most sensitive to metric deformations; increasing the Proca-hair parameter $Q$ weakens the damping as the charged three-horizon regime is approached; $\beta$ hardens the spectrum in the $(\alpha,\beta)$ scan; and increasing $\lambda$ and $c_1$ produces the strongest overall softening. For the neutral scalar $\ell=1$ mode, the time-domain Prony extraction agrees excellently with the WKB results and resolves both the Schwarzschild-like black-hole branch and the de Sitter branch. We also discuss the implications of the exact empty-de Sitter limit for strong cosmic censorship and note that the resulting quasinormal frequencies provide useful input for grey-body factors.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates quasinormal modes of massless scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac fields on asymptotically de Sitter black hole backgrounds in generalized Proca theory. These backgrounds include a primary hair parameter Q and an effective cosmological constant Λ_eff that alter the horizon structure. The authors derive master equations for the three spin sectors and compute the spectra via Padé-improved WKB supplemented by time-domain integration and Prony fitting. They report that the scalar sector (especially ℓ=0) is most sensitive to metric deformations, with increasing Q weakening damping near the three-horizon regime; β hardens the spectrum while λ and c1 produce the strongest softening. Excellent WKB-Prony agreement is noted for the neutral scalar ℓ=1 mode, and implications for strong cosmic censorship are discussed in the empty de Sitter limit.

Significance. If the reported spectra and sensitivity ordering hold, the results would provide useful information on how Proca hair modifies perturbation damping in de Sitter geometries, with direct relevance to strong cosmic censorship. A strength is the supplementation of WKB with time-domain Prony extraction (at least for the neutral scalar ℓ=1 mode) together with the parameter scans over Q, β, λ, and c1. The work also supplies concrete quasinormal frequencies that could serve as input for grey-body factor calculations.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: The headline claim that the scalar sector (especially ℓ=0) is most sensitive to metric deformations and that increasing Q weakens damping as the three-horizon regime is approached rests on the reliability of the Padé-improved WKB frequencies. However, the abstract states that Prony extraction agrees excellently with WKB only for the neutral scalar ℓ=1 mode; no cross-validation, error estimates, or convergence tests are mentioned for the ℓ=0 sector or for nonzero Q. If the WKB approximation degrades when the effective potential changes shape near the three-horizon limit, the reported sensitivity ordering and damping trend would not be secure.
  2. Abstract: The manuscript states that master equations were derived and spectra obtained, but provides no explicit equations, no error estimates, and no convergence tests. This absence makes it impossible to verify the absence of gaps or post-hoc choices in the calculations for the deformed hairy backgrounds.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract refers to 'generalized Proca theory' and lists parameters (Q, α, β, λ, c1) without indicating where the explicit action or the precise definitions of the free parameters appear in the main text; ensure these are stated clearly in an early section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional validations, explicit equations, and numerical details as outlined.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The headline claim that the scalar sector (especially ℓ=0) is most sensitive to metric deformations and that increasing Q weakens damping as the three-horizon regime is approached rests on the reliability of the Padé-improved WKB frequencies. However, the abstract states that Prony extraction agrees excellently with WKB only for the neutral scalar ℓ=1 mode; no cross-validation, error estimates, or convergence tests are mentioned for the ℓ=0 sector or for nonzero Q. If the WKB approximation degrades when the effective potential changes shape near the three-horizon limit, the reported sensitivity ordering and damping trend would not be secure.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for broader validation of the WKB results. The time-domain Prony extraction was performed and shows excellent agreement specifically for the neutral scalar ℓ=1 mode, as stated. For the ℓ=0 sector and nonzero Q, we relied on the Padé-improved WKB after verifying its stability through internal convergence checks on the continued-fraction and Padé orders. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit time-domain integrations and Prony fits for representative ℓ=0 modes at several Q values, together with tabulated error estimates and a brief discussion of the effective-potential shape near the three-horizon regime to confirm that the reported sensitivity ordering and damping trend remain robust. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript states that master equations were derived and spectra obtained, but provides no explicit equations, no error estimates, and no convergence tests. This absence makes it impossible to verify the absence of gaps or post-hoc choices in the calculations for the deformed hairy backgrounds.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of the explicit master equations and numerical-method details reduces verifiability. Although the master equations are obtained by standard linearization of the field equations on the given background and their derivation is summarized in Section 3, we will include the full explicit forms for the scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac sectors in the revised text. We will also add a dedicated subsection (or appendix) that reports the WKB implementation parameters, Padé orders, error estimates, convergence tests, and the precise settings used for the characteristic time-domain integration and Prony fitting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard linear perturbation analysis on fixed background

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by taking the hairy black-hole metric as a fixed, externally given solution of generalized Proca theory (parameters Q, α, β, λ, c1 treated as inputs), deriving the standard master equations for scalar, electromagnetic and Dirac perturbations, and extracting quasinormal frequencies via Padé-improved WKB supplemented by time-domain integration. None of the load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the target results: the frequencies are computed outputs, not redefinitions or fits renamed as predictions. The sensitivity ordering (scalar ℓ=0 most affected) and damping trends emerge from the numerical evaluation rather than being presupposed by the background choice or by self-citation. The single self-citation to prior Proca work is non-load-bearing and concerns only the background construction, not the perturbation spectra themselves.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central results rest on the existence of a hairy black-hole solution in generalized Proca theory, the validity of linear perturbation theory for three spin sectors, and the numerical accuracy of the chosen spectral methods.

free parameters (4)
  • Q
    Proca-hair parameter that deforms the metric and controls the three-horizon regime
  • β
    Theory parameter scanned in the (α,β) plane
  • λ
    Theory parameter whose increase produces strongest softening
  • c1
    Theory parameter whose increase produces strongest softening
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Generalized Proca Lagrangian defines the background metric
    The entire analysis assumes this specific vector-tensor theory admits the stated asymptotically de Sitter black-hole solutions
  • standard math Linear perturbation theory applies to massless scalar, electromagnetic, and Dirac fields
    Master equations are derived under the standard assumption that back-reaction is negligible
invented entities (2)
  • Proca primary hair no independent evidence
    purpose: Additional parameter Q that modifies horizon structure
    Introduced by the generalized Proca action; no independent observational evidence supplied in the abstract
  • Effective cosmological constant Λ_eff no independent evidence
    purpose: Reshapes the static patch and horizon radii
    Generated by the Proca sector; treated as derived rather than independently measured

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1636 out tokens · 53771 ms · 2026-05-13T04:46:52.650627+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    K. D. Kokkotas and B. G. Schmidt, Living Rev. Rel. 2, 2 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9909058

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    Quasinormal modes of black holes and black branes

    E. Berti, V. Cardoso, and A. O. Starinets, Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 163001 (2009), arXiv:0905.2975 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 793 (2011), arXiv:1102.4014 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol. 31, 423 (2025), arXiv:2504.05014 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Zhidenko, Class

    A. Zhidenko, Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 273 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0307012

    work page arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Molina, D

    C. Molina, D. Giugno, E. Abdalla, and A. Saa, Phys. Rev. D 69, 104013 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0309079

    work page arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 106, 124004 (2022), arXiv:2209.12058 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Quasinormal modes and Strong Cosmic Censorship,

    V. Cardoso, J. a. L. Costa, K. Destounis, P. Hintz, and A. Jansen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 031103 (2018), arXiv:1711.10502 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    O. J. C. Dias, H. S. Reall, and J. E. Santos, JHEP 10, 001 (2018), arXiv:1808.02895 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JCAP 11, 028 (2022), arXiv:2210.04314 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Zhu, S.-J

    Z. Zhu, S.-J. Zhang, C. E. Pellicer, B. Wang, and E. Abdalla, Phys. Rev. D 90, 044042 (2014), [Adden- dum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 049904 (2014)], arXiv:1405.4931 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  12. [12]

    M. A. Cuyubamba, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104053 (2016), arXiv:1604.03604 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 89, 024011 (2014), arXiv:1309.7667 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 76, 084018 (2007), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 90, 029901 (2014)], arXiv:0707.1890 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    Jansen, Eur

    A. Jansen, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 132, 546 (2017), arXiv:1709.09178 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Molina, Phys

    C. Molina, Phys. Rev. D 68, 064007 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0304053

    work page arXiv 2003

  17. [17]

    Aragón, R

    A. Aragón, R. Bécar, P. A. González, and Y. Vásquez, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 773 (2020), arXiv:2004.05632 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JHEP 06, 037 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0402080

    work page arXiv 2004

  19. [19]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 95, 104005 (2017), arXiv:1701.01652 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Y. Mo, Y. Tian, B. Wang, H. Zhang, and Z. Zhong, Phys. Rev. D 98, 124025 (2018), arXiv:1808.03635 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Nucl. Phys. B 777, 182 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0703231

    work page arXiv 2007

  22. [22]

    Kanti and R

    P. Kanti and R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D 73, 044002 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0512257

    work page arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JCAP 05, 050 (2017), arXiv:1705.01656 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  24. [24]

    Jing, Phys

    J.-l. Jing, Phys. Rev. D 69, 084009 (2004), arXiv:gr- qc/0312079

    work page arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    Dyatlov, Commun

    S. Dyatlov, Commun. Math. Phys. 306, 119 (2011), arXiv:1003.6128 [math.AP]

    work page arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 90, 064048 (2014), arXiv:1406.0019 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Charmousis, P

    C. Charmousis, P. G. S. Fernandes, and M. Has- saine, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2504.13084 [gr-qc], arXiv:2504.13084 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Charmousis, P

    C. Charmousis, P. G. S. Fernandes, and M. Hassaine, arXiv e-prints (2026), 10.48550/arXiv.2603.25598, arXiv:2603.25598 [gr-qc], 2603.25598

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.25598 2026

  29. [29]

    De Felice, L

    A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, S. Mukohyama, S. Tsujikawa, and Y.-l. Zhang, JCAP 06, 048 (2016), arXiv:1603.05806 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    De Felice, L

    A. De Felice, L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, S. Tsujikawa, Y.- l. Zhang, and G.-B. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 93, 104016 (2016), arXiv:1602.00371 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Heisenberg, R

    L. Heisenberg, R. Kase, and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Lett. B 760, 617 (2016), arXiv:1605.05565 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    Heisenberg, JCAP 05, 015 (2014), arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

    L. Heisenberg, JCAP 05, 015 (2014), arXiv:1402.7026 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2014

  33. [33]

    Carter, Commun

    B. Carter, Commun. Math. Phys. 10, 280 (1968)

    work page 1968

  34. [34]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlík, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084044 (2018), arXiv:1801.07195 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    López-Ortega, Gen

    A. López-Ortega, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 39, 1011 (2007), arXiv:0704.2468 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2007

  36. [36]

    D. R. Brill and J. A. Wheeler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 465 (1957)

    work page 1957

  37. [37]

    H. T. Cho, Phys. Rev. D 68, 024003 (2003), arXiv:gr- qc/0303078

    work page arXiv 2003

  38. [38]

    Kanti, R

    P. Kanti, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 74, 064008 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0607048

    work page arXiv 2006

  39. [39]

    Iyer and C

    S. Iyer and C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 35, 3621 (1987)

    work page 1987

  40. [40]

    R. A. Konoplya, Phys. Rev. D 68, 024018 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0303052

    work page arXiv 2003

  41. [41]

    Matyjasek and M

    J. Matyjasek and M. Opała, Phys. Rev. D 96, 024011 (2017), arXiv:1704.00361 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2017

  42. [42]

    Matyjasek and M

    J. Matyjasek and M. Telecka, Phys. Rev. D 100, 124006 (2019), arXiv:1908.09389 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Matyjasek, R

    J. Matyjasek, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 2, 5 (2026), arXiv:2603.12466 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Dubinsky, Int

    A. Dubinsky, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 2, 6 (2026), arXiv:2603.17644 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 686, 199 (2010), arXiv:0909.2138 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2010

  46. [46]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 486 (2025), arXiv:2503.16087 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  47. [47]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 1, 6 (2025), arXiv:2509.15995 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    S. V. Bolokhov, K. A. Bronnikov, and M. V. Skvortsova, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 2, 2 (2026), arXiv:2507.14603 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    Skvortsova, Eur

    M. Skvortsova, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 854 (2025), arXiv:2411.06007 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    R. A. Konoplya, JCAP 07, 001 (2023), arXiv:2305.09187 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Guo and Y.-G

    Y. Guo and Y.-G. Miao, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064049 (2020), arXiv:2005.07524 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  52. [52]

    Malik, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2511.12335 [gr- qc]

    Z. Malik, arXiv e-prints (2025), arXiv:2511.12335 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Class. Quant. Grav. 40, 245005 (2023), arXiv:2309.02560 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  54. [54]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 1, 3 (2025), arXiv:2507.07196 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Dubinsky, Annals Phys

    A. Dubinsky, Annals Phys. 485, 170299 (2026), arXiv:2509.11017 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    D. S. Eniceicu and M. Reece, Phys. Rev. D 102, 044015 12 (2020), arXiv:1912.05553 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  57. [57]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 630 (2025), arXiv:2504.18482 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [58]

    K. D. Kokkotas, R. A. Konoplya, and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Rev. D 83, 024031 (2011), arXiv:1011.1843 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 2, 3 (2026), arXiv:2603.18887 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  60. [60]

    Momennia, S

    M. Momennia, S. Hossein Hendi, and F. Soltani Bidgoli, Phys. Lett. B 813, 136028 (2021), arXiv:1807.01792 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  61. [61]

    Dubinsky and A

    A. Dubinsky and A. F. Zinhailo, EPL 149, 69004 (2025), arXiv:2410.15232 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  62. [62]

    B. C. Lütfüoğlu, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 39 (2026), arXiv:2505.06966 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. F. Zinhailo, Phys. Rev. D 99, 104060 (2019), arXiv:1904.05341 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    P. A. González, E. Papantonopoulos, Á. Rincón, and Y. Vásquez, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024050 (2022), arXiv:2205.06079 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  65. [65]

    Malik, Annals Phys

    Z. Malik, Annals Phys. 482, 170238 (2025), arXiv:2504.12570 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    S. V. Bolokhov and M. Skvortsova, Eur. Phys. J. C 86, 374 (2026), arXiv:2508.19989 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  67. [67]

    S. V. Bolokhov, (2026), arXiv:2605.03137 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  68. [68]

    Gundlach, R

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. D 49, 883 (1994)

    work page 1994

  69. [69]

    Gundlach, R

    C. Gundlach, R. H. Price, and J. Pullin, Phys. Rev. D 49, 890 (1994)

    work page 1994

  70. [70]

    R. A. Konoplya, Z. Stuchlik, A. Zhidenko, and A. F. Zinhailo, Phys. Rev. D 107, 104050 (2023), arXiv:2303.01987 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [71]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Rev. D 110, 024010 (2024), arXiv:2311.05503 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  72. [72]

    Skvortsova, Grav

    M. Skvortsova, Grav. Cosmol. 30, 279 (2024), arXiv:2405.15807 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Malik, Int

    Z. Malik, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 63, 199 (2024), arXiv:2308.10412 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    J. P. Arbelaez, arXiv e-prints (2026), arXiv:2601.22340 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, Phys. Lett. B 856, 138945 (2024), arXiv:2404.09063 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    W.-L. Qian, K. Lin, C.-Y. Shao, B. Wang, and R.-H. Yue, Eur. Phys. J. C 82, 931 (2022), arXiv:2203.04477 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Dubinsky, Int

    A. Dubinsky, Int. J. Grav. Theor. Phys. 1, 2 (2025), arXiv:2507.00256 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Skvortsova, Fortsch

    M. Skvortsova, Fortsch. Phys. 72, 2400132 (2024), arXiv:2405.06390 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    Varghese and V

    N. Varghese and V. C. Kuriakose, Gen. Rel. Grav. 43, 2757 (2011), arXiv:1011.6608 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2011

  80. [80]

    S. V. Bolokhov, Phys. Lett. B 856, 138879 (2024), arXiv:2310.12326 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.