pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12125 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

Recognition: no theorem link

Following the thread: surface and bulk solvent migration in silicone elastomers from local volumetric swelling

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 04:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords poroelasticitysolvent diffusionPDMS elastomersvolumetric swellinginterfacial boundary conditionsdiffusivity measurementFlory-Rehner theorybending deformation
0
0 comments X

The pith

In situ 3D swelling measurements show solvent entry into silicone elastomers is limited by surface flux rather than full drainage.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that the standard assumption of a fully drained interface in poroelastic swelling models does not hold for PDMS networks. In situ 3D tracking of local volume changes during free swelling and bending reveals that solvent flux at the surface is the rate-limiting step. This boundary correction raises the extracted diffusivity by an order of magnitude compared with conventional bulk analysis. Equilibrium swelling is captured only after the Flory-Rehner relation is adjusted for finite chain extensibility. Local dilation and contraction measurements in bent beams of three different preparations then give consistent diffusivity values that also match force-relaxation data.

Core claim

In situ 3D spatiotemporal measurements of local volumetric swelling during free swelling of PDMS networks identify a flux-limited interfacial boundary condition, contradicting the canonical fully drained assumption. This correction removes an order-of-magnitude underestimation of diffusivity obtained from standard bulk analysis. Swelling equilibrium is described by a Flory-Rehner theory modified to include effective finite extensibility of the filled network. In a bending configuration, as-prepared and mobile-phase-free beams exhibit no net volumetric change or force relaxation, yet local measurements resolve tensile-side dilation and compressive-side contraction that yield effective diffusv

What carries the argument

The flux-limited interfacial boundary condition identified through local volumetric swelling measurements, which sets the solvent entry rate at the elastomer surface.

If this is right

  • Diffusivity extracted from bulk swelling data increases by an order of magnitude once the surface flux limit is included.
  • Swelling equilibrium requires a Flory-Rehner relation adjusted for finite extensibility of the crosslinked network.
  • Local volumetric dilation on the tensile side and contraction on the compressive side directly resolve solvent diffusivity in bent beams.
  • Effective diffusivities from local measurements agree with independent force-relaxation results across the tested preparations.
  • Solvent migration shows no discernible net volume change or force relaxation in as-prepared and mobile-phase-free beams.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same local volumetric approach could be used to extract transport parameters in other poroelastic solids such as hydrogels or geomaterials.
  • Revised interfacial conditions may improve time-dependent models for poroelastic effects in biological tissues or seismic contexts.
  • Controlled variation of surface chemistry or solvent viscosity could test whether the flux limit is a general feature or specific to silicone-oil pairs.

Load-bearing premise

The three material preparations produce comparable solvent migration behavior without preparation-induced changes in network structure or mobile-phase content that would confound the local strain measurements.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of solvent concentration profiles immediately inside the interface showing unlimited influx matching the fully drained rate, or bulk analysis with the corrected boundary still underestimating diffusivity relative to local data, would falsify the flux-limited claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12125 by Chenzhuo Li, John M. Kolinski, Marc Antonio Chalhoub, Tom Beyeler.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (A) Two different boundary conditions are used to drive solvent transport in polymer networks. Concentration-driven solvent flux (e.g., free swelling, upper panel): an initially solvent-poor polymer (typically dry polymer) is immersed in a large solvent bath without any constraint. The bath-polymer contrast in concentration establishes a chemical potential gradient and drives solvent uptake until thermodyn… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (A) The equilibrium swelling ratio 𝑄eq versus silicone oil molar mass 𝑀𝑠. The classic Flory–Rehner prediction overes￾timates swelling at small 𝑀𝑠 (dotted line). Including finite extensibility via the Gent model and fitting the locking parameter 𝐽𝑚 captures the equilibrium swelling ratio (red dashed line). However, setting 𝐽𝑚 = 12 as obtained from uniaxial tensile tests (Fig. S2B, Supplementary Text) still … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Validation of 3D particle tracking in local free swelling and effective diffusivity measurement. (A) Experimental setup. A TT sample (initial thickness 𝐻0 = 160 µm) with 1.1 µm embedded microparticles is gently clamped on the grip and silicone oil of viscosity 𝜂𝑠 = 5, 20 and 50 cP is introduced at 𝑡 = 0. The TT PDMS swells freely; only minimal far-field tension is applied to maintain the sample flatness fo… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Quantification of local volumetric change in bent PDMS via 3D particle tracking. (A) Experimental setup: the bent PDMS beam is immersed in a glycerol–water bath with refractive index matched to PDMS, and tracer particles are imaged with scattered light. Upper-right inset: two volumes of interest (VOIs, red) at mid-span—one on the tensile side and one on the compressive side— are imaged over time. Lower-rig… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Force relaxation and in-plane area change in bent PDMS beams. (A) Experimental setup. AP, TT, and FS (𝜂𝑠 = 5, 20 and 50 cP) PDMS beams are spray-painted with speckle patterns on one face. At 𝑡 = 0, a motorized actuator rapidly imposes a displacement step by setting the span to 15 mm (unless noted; corresponding curvatures in Fig. S11). Schematic of the relaxation protocol is shown in the lower inset: after… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Summary of solvent diffusivity 𝐷 versus solvent viscosity 𝜂𝑠 in PDMS and related silicone-rubber networks. Colored regions indicate the ranges measured here in free swelling (purple) and bending-driven migration (blue); the gray region summarizes literature values (compiled in Table S1, Supplementary Text). The red star marks the recently reported value for a similar silicone system (40). Our measurements … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Polymer network Solvent 𝜂𝑠 [cP] 𝐷 [m2 s −1 ] Reference PDMS 10:1 (Essex Brownell) Pentane 0.23 (5.9 ± 0.1) × 10−9 (6) PDMS 10:1 (Essex Brownell) Heptane 0.386 (2.3 ± 0.03) × 10−9 (6) PDMS 10:1 (Essex Brownell) Decane 0.92 (1.1 ± 0.08) × 10−9 (6) PDMS 10:1 (Essex Brownell) Cyclohexane 0.9 (1.2 ± 0.03) × 10−9 (6) PDMS Heptane 0.386 (3.1 ± 0.2) × 10−9 (62) PDMS 10:1 (Sylgard 184) Silicone oil (V100) 96.0 (1.0… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Poroelastic materials, consisting of a permeable solid matrix infiltrated with fluid, are ubiquitous in natural and engineering contexts. In poroelastic polymer solids, the elastic matrix swells to equilibrium when immersed in a solvent bath; thus, the network elasticity couples to the solvent transport. Despite the ubiquity and importance of poroelastic theory in describing phenomena as diverse as earthquakes and biological tissues, there is a paucity of experimental data that probe the local network response to controlled stress and solvent boundary conditions. Here, we first probe the baseline diffusion kinetics of a polymeric solvent during free swelling of a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) network with well-characterized silicone oils. In situ 3D spatiotemporal measurements identify a flux-limited interfacial boundary condition, contradicting the canonical fully drained assumption. This correction eliminates an order-of-magnitude underestimation of diffusivity in standard bulk analysis. The swelling equilibrium is accurately captured by a Flory-Rehner theory that requires modification to include the effective finite extensibility of the filled network. Solvent migration is then studied using a bending configuration for three material preparations: as-prepared, mobile-phase-free, and fully swollen in silicone oils. The as-prepared and mobile-phase-free beams show no discernible volumetric change or force relaxation, whereas local in situ measurements directly resolve tensile-side dilation and compressive-side contraction, yielding the effective diffusivities in agreement with the force-relaxation data. These measurements rigorously benchmark solvent diffusivity in polymer networks, underscoring the importance of unambiguous interfacial boundary conditions and shedding light on mechanics and engineering across poroelastic polymers and geomaterials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports in situ 3D spatiotemporal measurements of solvent migration in PDMS elastomers during free swelling and bending. It identifies a flux-limited interfacial boundary condition (contradicting the canonical fully drained assumption) that corrects an order-of-magnitude underestimation of diffusivity from standard bulk analysis. Swelling equilibrium is captured by a modified Flory-Rehner theory that incorporates effective finite extensibility of the filled network. Bending tests on as-prepared, mobile-phase-free, and fully swollen samples resolve local tensile dilation and compressive contraction, yielding effective diffusivities that agree with force-relaxation data.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work is significant for poroelastic modeling of polymer networks because it supplies direct local volumetric data that challenge standard boundary-condition assumptions and provides a cross-validated benchmark for solvent diffusivity. The multi-configuration experimental design (free swelling plus bending) and the use of in situ 3D imaging are clear strengths that could improve predictions in applications ranging from soft robotics to geomaterials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Bending configuration experiments] Bending configuration experiments: the validation that local tensile dilation/compressive contraction yields diffusivities agreeing with force-relaxation data (and thereby confirms the flux-limited boundary condition extracted from free-swelling data) rests on the claim that the three material preparations produce comparable solvent-migration behavior without preparation-induced changes in network structure or mobile-phase content. No explicit characterization (e.g., crosslink density via swelling ratio, residual solvent via spectroscopy, or chain mobility) is provided to rule out mechanical artifacts in the local strain measurements; this is load-bearing for the benchmarking claim.
  2. [Free-swelling and diffusivity analysis] Free-swelling and diffusivity analysis: the order-of-magnitude diffusivity correction is asserted to follow from the flux-limited interfacial boundary condition identified in the 3D spatiotemporal data. The manuscript does not detail the quantitative extraction procedure, fitting protocol, or error analysis that converts the observed concentration profiles into the corrected diffusivity value, making independent verification of the magnitude of the correction impossible from the presented information.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the PDMS network is 'well-characterized' but supplies no numerical values for crosslink density, oil molecular weight, or viscosity; adding these parameters would improve immediate reproducibility.
  2. Notation for the effective finite extensibility parameter in the modified Flory-Rehner theory is introduced without an explicit equation reference in the main text; a numbered equation would clarify its definition and use.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the work's significance and for the detailed, constructive comments. We address each major point below with clarifications and commitments to revision.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Bending configuration experiments] Bending configuration experiments: the validation that local tensile dilation/compressive contraction yields diffusivities agreeing with force-relaxation data (and thereby confirms the flux-limited boundary condition extracted from free-swelling data) rests on the claim that the three material preparations produce comparable solvent-migration behavior without preparation-induced changes in network structure or mobile-phase content. No explicit characterization (e.g., crosslink density via swelling ratio, residual solvent via spectroscopy, or chain mobility) is provided to rule out mechanical artifacts in the local strain measurements; this is load-bearing for the benchmarking claim.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on this critical validation step. The three preparations are standard protocols in the silicone elastomer literature, and the complete absence of detectable volumetric change or force relaxation in the as-prepared and mobile-phase-free beams already provides indirect evidence that network structure and mobile-phase content are not altered in a way that would produce artifacts. Nevertheless, to make this explicit and rule out mechanical artifacts, the revised manuscript will include additional characterization: equilibrium swelling ratios (to confirm crosslink density equivalence), FTIR spectroscopy (to quantify any residual solvent in the mobile-phase-free samples), and a brief discussion of chain mobility inferred from the lack of relaxation. These data will be added to the methods and results sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Free-swelling and diffusivity analysis] Free-swelling and diffusivity analysis: the order-of-magnitude diffusivity correction is asserted to follow from the flux-limited interfacial boundary condition identified in the 3D spatiotemporal data. The manuscript does not detail the quantitative extraction procedure, fitting protocol, or error analysis that converts the observed concentration profiles into the corrected diffusivity value, making independent verification of the magnitude of the correction impossible from the presented information.

    Authors: We agree that the quantitative procedure for extracting the corrected diffusivity was not described in sufficient detail. The order-of-magnitude correction originates from replacing the canonical Dirichlet (fully drained) boundary condition with a flux-limited Robin condition whose coefficient is determined directly from the 3D concentration profiles. In the revision we will add a dedicated subsection in the Methods and a supplementary note that fully specifies the extraction: (i) the 3D spatiotemporal solvent volume-fraction fields are obtained from the imaging data, (ii) these fields are fitted to the numerical solution of the diffusion equation subject to the flux-limited boundary condition via nonlinear least-squares minimization, (iii) the resulting diffusivity is compared against the value obtained under the standard bulk (Dirichlet) assumption, and (iv) error bars are computed from the covariance matrix of the fit together with propagation of imaging noise. This will allow independent verification of the correction factor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental identification of boundary condition and diffusivity from direct measurements, independent of self-referential definitions or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The derivation chain rests on in situ 3D volumetric strain measurements during free swelling and bending of PDMS samples. The flux-limited interfacial boundary condition is extracted from observed spatiotemporal solvent migration kinetics, directly contradicting the fully drained assumption and correcting bulk diffusivity estimates. Effective diffusivities from local tensile/compressive strains in as-prepared, mobile-phase-free, and fully swollen beams are benchmarked against independent force-relaxation data. Swelling equilibrium is compared to a modified Flory-Rehner model incorporating finite extensibility, but the modification is presented as required by the data rather than presupposed. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain bears the central claim, and the three preparations serve as consistency checks without definitional loops. The analysis is self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard poroelastic coupling of elasticity and transport plus one modification to equilibrium theory; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • effective finite extensibility parameter
    Introduced in the modified Flory-Rehner model to capture equilibrium swelling of the filled network.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Network elasticity couples to solvent transport in poroelastic solids, with swelling reaching equilibrium when immersed in solvent.
    Invoked to interpret both free-swelling kinetics and bending-induced solvent migration.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1205 out tokens · 58543 ms · 2026-05-13T04:35:06.742712+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 100 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Wang,Theory of linear poroelasticity with applications to geomechanics and hydrogeology, vol

    H. Wang,Theory of linear poroelasticity with applications to geomechanics and hydrogeology, vol. 2 (Princeton university press) (2000)

  2. [2]

    V. C. Mow, S. Kuei, W. M. Lai, C. G. Armstrong, Biphasic creep and stress relaxation of articular cartilage in compression: theory and experiments.Journal of biomechanical engineering102(1), 73–84 (1980)

  3. [3]

    S. C. Cowin, Bone poroelasticity.Journal of biomechanics32(3), 217–238 (1999)

  4. [4]

    Liu,et al., Intercellular flow dominates the poroelasticity of multicellular tissues.Nature Physicspp

    F. Liu,et al., Intercellular flow dominates the poroelasticity of multicellular tissues.Nature Physicspp. 1–8 (2025)

  5. [5]

    Foudazi, R

    R. Foudazi, R. Zowada, I. Manas-Zloczower, D. L. Feke, Porous hydrogels: present challenges and future opportunities.Langmuir39(6), 2092–2111 (2023)

  6. [6]

    Y. Hu, X. Chen, G. M. Whitesides, J. J. Vlassak, Z. Suo, Indentation of polydimethylsiloxane submerged in organic solvents.Journal of Materials Research26(6), 785–795 (2011)

  7. [7]

    M. A. Biot, General theory of three-dimensional consolidation.Journal of applied physics12(2), 155–164 (1941)

  8. [8]

    A. H.-D. Cheng,Poroelasticity, vol. 27 (Springer) (2016)

  9. [9]

    Doi, Gel dynamics.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan78(5), 052001 (2009)

    M. Doi, Gel dynamics.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan78(5), 052001 (2009)

  10. [10]

    Rubinstein, R

    M. Rubinstein, R. H. Colby,Polymer physics(Oxford university press) (2003)

  11. [11]

    D. J. Beebe,et al., Functional hydrogel structures for autonomous flow control inside microfluidic channels. nature404(6778), 588–590 (2000)

  12. [12]

    D. T. Eddington, D. J. Beebe, Flow control with hydrogels.Advanced drug delivery reviews56(2), 199–210 (2004)

  13. [13]

    Beck,et al., Fundamentals of hydrogel-based valves and chemofluidic transistors for lab-on-a-chip technology: a tutorial review.Advanced Materials Technologies8(3), 2200417 (2023)

    A. Beck,et al., Fundamentals of hydrogel-based valves and chemofluidic transistors for lab-on-a-chip technology: a tutorial review.Advanced Materials Technologies8(3), 2200417 (2023)

  14. [14]

    Chen,et al., PDMS-Swelling Induced Microchannel Reshaping and Its Applications in Droplet Microfluidics

    L. Chen,et al., PDMS-Swelling Induced Microchannel Reshaping and Its Applications in Droplet Microfluidics. ACS Materials Letters7(6), 2172–2180 (2025)

  15. [15]

    S. W. Kim, Y. H. Bae, T. Okano, Hydrogels: swelling, drug loading, and release.Pharmaceutical research9(3), 283–290 (1992)

  16. [16]

    W. B. Liechty, D. R. Kryscio, B. V. Slaughter, N. A. Peppas, Polymers for drug delivery systems.Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering1(1), 149–173 (2010)

  17. [17]

    J. G. Turner, L. R. White, P. Estrela, H. S. Leese, Hydrogel-forming microneedles: current advancements and future trends.Macromolecular bioscience21(2), 2000307 (2021)

  18. [18]

    Kim,et al., Rapid custom prototyping of soft poroelastic biosensor for simultaneous epicardial recording and imaging.Nature Communications12(1), 3710 (2021)

    B. Kim,et al., Rapid custom prototyping of soft poroelastic biosensor for simultaneous epicardial recording and imaging.Nature Communications12(1), 3710 (2021)

  19. [19]

    W. Feng, Z. Wang, Tailoring the swelling-shrinkable behavior of hydrogels for biomedical applications.Advanced Science10(28), 2303326 (2023). 13

  20. [20]

    Selvaprithiviraj, C

    V. Selvaprithiviraj, C. Vaquette, S. Ivanovski, Hydrogel based soft tissue expanders for orodental reconstruction. Acta Biomaterialia172, 53–66 (2023)

  21. [21]

    P. J. Flory, J. Rehner Jr, Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks II. Swelling.The journal of chemical physics11(11), 521–526 (1943)

  22. [22]

    P. J. Flory,Principles of polymer chemistry(Cornell university press) (1953)

  23. [23]

    S. P. Obukhov, M. Rubinstein, R. H. Colby, Network modulus and superelasticity.Macromolecules27(12), 3191–3198 (1994)

  24. [24]

    L. G. Treloar,The physics of rubber elasticity(OUP Oxford) (1975)

  25. [25]

    J. Tang, J. Li, J. J. Vlassak, Z. Suo, Fatigue fracture of hydrogels.Extreme Mechanics Letters10, 24–31 (2017)

  26. [26]

    Yamamoto, J

    T. Yamamoto, J. A. Campbell, S. Panyukov, M. Rubinstein, Scaling theory of swelling and deswelling of polymer networks.Macromolecules55(9), 3588–3601 (2022)

  27. [27]

    Subramani,et al., The influence of swelling on elastic properties of polyacrylamide hydrogels.Frontiers in Materials7, 212 (2020)

    R. Subramani,et al., The influence of swelling on elastic properties of polyacrylamide hydrogels.Frontiers in Materials7, 212 (2020)

  28. [28]

    G. W. Scherer, Bending of gel beams: method for characterizing elastic properties and permeability.Journal of non-crystalline solids142, 18–35 (1992)

  29. [29]

    Y. Hu, X. Zhao, J. J. Vlassak, Z. Suo, Using indentation to characterize the poroelasticity of gels.Applied Physics Letters96(12) (2010)

  30. [30]

    J. Yoon, S. Cai, Z. Suo, R. C. Hayward, Poroelastic swelling kinetics of thin hydrogel layers: comparison of theory and experiment.Soft Matter6(23), 6004–6012 (2010)

  31. [31]

    Bouklas, R

    N. Bouklas, R. Huang, Swelling kinetics of polymer gels: comparison of linear and nonlinear theories.Soft Matter 8(31), 8194–8203 (2012)

  32. [32]

    X.-F. Wei, E. Linde, M. S. Hedenqvist, Plasticiser loss from plastic or rubber products through diffusion and evaporation.npj Materials Degradation3(1), 18 (2019)

  33. [33]

    Akhtar, S

    M. Akhtar, S. Z. Qamar, T. Pervez, F. K. Al-Jahwari, Performance evaluation of swelling elastomer seals.Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering165, 127–135 (2018)

  34. [34]

    N. Joshi,et al., A mechanically resilient soft hydrogel improves drug delivery for treating post-traumatic os- teoarthritis in physically active joints.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122(14), e2409729122 (2025)

  35. [35]

    Liang, J

    Y. Liang, J. He, B. Guo, Functional hydrogels as wound dressing to enhance wound healing.ACS nano15(8), 12687–12722 (2021)

  36. [36]

    S. G. Harrellson,et al., Hydration solids.Nature619(7970), 500–505 (2023)

  37. [37]

    G. Y. Gor, G. W. Scherer, H. A. Stone, Bacterial spores respond to humidity similarly to hydrogels.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(10), e2320763121 (2024)

  38. [38]

    S. Li, D. A. Matoz-Fernandez, A. Aggarwal, M. Olvera de la Cruz, Chemically controlled pattern formation in self-oscillating elastic shells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118(10), e2025717118 (2021). 14

  39. [39]

    A. A. Polotsky, F. A. Plamper, O. V. Borisov, Collapse-to-swelling transitions in pH-and thermoresponsive microgels in aqueous dispersions: The thermodynamic theory.Macromolecules46(21), 8702–8709 (2013)

  40. [40]

    Z. Wang, S. Das, A. Joshi, A. J. Shaikeea, V. S. Deshpande, 3D observations provide striking findings in rubber elasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(24), e2404205121 (2024)

  41. [41]

    Pezzulla, S

    M. Pezzulla, S. A. Shillig, P. Nardinocchi, D. P. Holmes, Morphing of geometric composites via residual swelling. Soft Matter11(29), 5812–5820 (2015)

  42. [42]

    Wang,et al., Programmable shape-shifting 3D structures via frontal photopolymerization.Materials & Design 198, 109381 (2021)

    J. Wang,et al., Programmable shape-shifting 3D structures via frontal photopolymerization.Materials & Design 198, 109381 (2021)

  43. [43]

    Marcilla, S

    A. Marcilla, S. Garcıa, J. Garcıa-Quesada, Study of the migration of PVC plasticizers.Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis71(2), 457–463 (2004)

  44. [44]

    Tanaka, D

    T. Tanaka, D. J. Fillmore, Kinetics of swelling of gels.The Journal of Chemical Physics70(3), 1214–1218 (1979)

  45. [45]

    Durning, K

    C. Durning, K. Morman Jr, Nonlinear swelling of polymer gels.The Journal of chemical physics98(5), 4275–4293 (1993)

  46. [46]

    G. W. Scherer, Measurement of permeability I. Theory.Journal of non-crystalline solids113(2-3), 107–118 (1989)

  47. [47]

    W. Hong, X. Zhao, J. Zhou, Z. Suo, A theory of coupled diffusion and large deformation in polymeric gels. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids56(5), 1779–1793 (2008)

  48. [48]

    Xiong, A

    Y. Xiong, A. Aggarwal, M. Olvera de la Cruz, Chemo-Mechanical Coupling in Hydrogels: Dynamics in the Diffusion-Limited Regime.Advanced Functional Materialsp. 2507078 (2025)

  49. [49]

    Bouklas, C

    N. Bouklas, C. M. Landis, R. Huang, Effect of solvent diffusion on crack-tip fields and driving force for fracture of hydrogels.Journal of Applied Mechanics82(8), 081007 (2015)

  50. [50]

    Y. Yu, C. M. Landis, R. Huang, Steady-state crack growth in polymer gels: a linear poroelastic analysis.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids118, 15–39 (2018)

  51. [51]

    Y. Yu, C. M. Landis, R. Huang, Poroelastic effects on steady state crack growth in polymer gels under plane stress.Mechanics of Materials143, 103320 (2020)

  52. [52]

    Yang,et al., Rate-dependent fracture of hydrogels due to water migration.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids167, 105007 (2022)

    Y. Yang,et al., Rate-dependent fracture of hydrogels due to water migration.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids167, 105007 (2022)

  53. [53]

    Plummer, C

    A. Plummer, C. Adkins, J.-F. Louf, A. Ko ˇsmrlj, S. S. Datta, Obstructed swelling and fracture of hydrogels.Soft matter20(7), 1425–1437 (2024)

  54. [54]

    Vesely, Diffusion of liquids in polymers.International Materials Reviews53(5), 299–315 (2008)

    D. Vesely, Diffusion of liquids in polymers.International Materials Reviews53(5), 299–315 (2008)

  55. [55]

    Dangla, F

    R. Dangla, F. Gallaire, C. N. Baroud, Microchannel deformations due to solvent-induced PDMS swelling.Lab on a Chip10(21), 2972–2978 (2010)

  56. [56]

    Sotiri,et al., Tunability of liquid-infused silicone materials for biointerfaces.Biointerphases13(6) (2018)

    I. Sotiri,et al., Tunability of liquid-infused silicone materials for biointerfaces.Biointerphases13(6) (2018). 15

  57. [57]

    C. J. Wolf, K. L. Jerina, H. J. Brandon, V. Young, The transport of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) in lightly cross-linked silicone rubber.Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition12(7), 801–815 (2001)

  58. [58]

    Cocchi, M

    G. Cocchi, M. G. De Angelis, F. Doghieri, Solubility and diffusivity of liquids for food and pharmaceutical applications in crosslinked polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) films: I. Experimental data on pure organic components and vegetable oil.Journal of Membrane Science492, 600–611 (2015)

  59. [59]

    Wagner,et al., Solvent Diffusion Modeling in Silicone.Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data69(2), 472–481 (2023)

    S. Wagner,et al., Solvent Diffusion Modeling in Silicone.Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data69(2), 472–481 (2023)

  60. [60]

    C.-Y. Hui, Y. Y. Lin, F.-C. Chuang, K. R. Shull, W.-C. Lin, A contact mechanics method for characterizing the elastic properties and permeability of gels.Journal of Polymer Science Part B: Polymer Physics44(2), 359–370 (2006)

  61. [61]

    Z. I. Kalcioglu, R. Mahmoodian, Y. Hu, Z. Suo, K. J. Van Vliet, From macro-to microscale poroelastic charac- terization of polymeric hydrogels via indentation.Soft Matter8(12), 3393–3398 (2012)

  62. [62]

    Y. Hu, E. P. Chan, J. J. Vlassak, Z. Suo, Poroelastic relaxation indentation of thin layers of gels.Journal of Applied Physics110(8) (2011)

  63. [63]

    J.-F. Louf, S. S. Datta, Poroelastic shape relaxation of hydrogel particles.Soft matter17(14), 3840–3847 (2021)

  64. [64]

    C. Li, D. Zubko, D. Delespaul, J. M. Kolinski, 3D characterization of kinematic fields and poroelastic swelling near the tip of a propagating crack in a hydrogel.International Journal of Fracture248(1), 221–235 (2024)

  65. [65]

    Hartquist, S

    C. Hartquist, S. Wang, X. Zhao, Local volume changes in deformed elastomers with mobile chains.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121(30), e2410811121 (2024)

  66. [66]

    Vergne, Super low traction under EHD & mixed lubrication regimes, inSuperlubricity(Elsevier), pp

    P. Vergne, Super low traction under EHD & mixed lubrication regimes, inSuperlubricity(Elsevier), pp. 427–443 (2007)

  67. [67]

    Viovy, Electrophoresis of DNA and other polyelectrolytes: Physical mechanisms.Reviews of Modern Physics 72(3), 813 (2000)

    J.-L. Viovy, Electrophoresis of DNA and other polyelectrolytes: Physical mechanisms.Reviews of Modern Physics 72(3), 813 (2000)

  68. [68]

    M. O. de la Cruz, D. Gersappe, E. O. Shaffer, Dynamics of DNA during pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.Physical review letters64(19), 2324 (1990)

  69. [69]

    J. M. Clough, C. Creton, S. L. Craig, R. P. Sijbesma, Covalent bond scission in the Mullins effect of a filled elastomer: real-time visualization with mechanoluminescence.Advanced Functional Materials26(48), 9063– 9074 (2016)

  70. [70]

    Suriboot,et al., Amphiphilic, thixotropic additives for extrusion-based 3D printing of silica-reinforced silicone

    J. Suriboot,et al., Amphiphilic, thixotropic additives for extrusion-based 3D printing of silica-reinforced silicone. Soft Matter17(15), 4133–4142 (2021)

  71. [71]

    B. Deng, S. Wang, C. Hartquist, X. Zhao, Nonlocal intrinsic fracture energy of polymerlike networks.Physical Review Letters131(22), 228102 (2023)

  72. [72]

    J. Li, Z. Suo, J. J. Vlassak, A model of ideal elastomeric gels for polyelectrolyte gels.Soft matter10(15), 2582–2590 (2014)

  73. [73]

    Okumura, S

    D. Okumura, S. A. Chester, Ultimate swelling described by limiting chain extensibility of swollen elastomers. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences144, 531–539 (2018). 16

  74. [74]

    Y. Zhou, L. Jin, Hydrolysis-induced large swelling of polyacrylamide hydrogels.Soft Matter16(24), 5740–5749 (2020)

  75. [75]

    A. N. Gent, A new constitutive relation for rubber.Rubber chemistry and technology69(1), 59–61 (1996)

  76. [76]

    Mullins, Softening of rubber by deformation.Rubber chemistry and technology42(1), 339–362 (1969)

    L. Mullins, Softening of rubber by deformation.Rubber chemistry and technology42(1), 339–362 (1969)

  77. [77]

    J. Kim, T. Yin, Z. Suo, Polyacrylamide hydrogels. V. Some strands in a polymer network bear loads, but all strands contribute to swelling.Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids168, 105017 (2022)

  78. [78]

    Benkley, C

    T. Benkley, C. Li, J. Kolinski, Estimation of the deformation gradient tensor by particle tracking near a free boundary with quantified error.Experimental Mechanics63(7), 1255–1270 (2023)

  79. [79]

    J. Wang, J. C. Burton, Hyperelastic swelling of stiff hydrogels.Physical Review Letters134(14), 148203 (2025)

  80. [80]

    Walker, M

    M. Walker, M. Godin, J. L. Harden, A. E. Pelling, Time dependent stress relaxation and recovery in mechanically strained 3D microtissues.APL bioengineering4(3) (2020)

Showing first 80 references.