pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12420 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌌 astro-ph.EP

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Modeling and Analysis of Main-Belt Asteroidal Dust Flux and Velocity Distribution at Inner Planets

Aanchal Sahu, Jayesh Pabari

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 02:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.EP
keywords asteroidal dustmain-belt asteroidsinterplanetary dustN-body simulationsinner planetsimpact velocitydust fluxplanetary atmospheres
0
0 comments X

The pith

Main-belt asteroid dust flux at Mercury, Venus and Mars matches standard models within 0.1 orders of magnitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models the dynamical evolution of dust particles ejected from main-belt asteroids as they travel inward using N-body simulations that include solar gravity, planetary perturbations, radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag and solar wind. It calculates arrival fluxes and impact velocity distributions at Mercury, Venus and Mars and finds close agreement with existing interplanetary dust models after calibration. The results reveal a decoupling in which low-eccentricity grains supply most of the total flux while high-eccentricity grains produce the high-velocity tail. This distinction matters because low-speed arrivals control ablation and metal-layer formation in the atmospheres of Mars and Venus, whereas fast impacts shape surface processes and exosphere generation on Mercury. The calibrated values supply direct inputs for mission planning and for modeling dust-driven modification of inner-planet environments.

Core claim

The calibrated asteroidal flux agrees with the scaled Grün model for Mars (0.04 orders of magnitude offset) and Venus (0.09 orders) and with the Müller (2002) model for Mercury (0.04 orders). The velocity distributions show that low-eccentricity grains dominate the flux while high-eccentricity grains control the high-velocity tail, decoupling total arrival rate from impact speed and linking dust energetics directly to the orbital architecture of the population.

What carries the argument

N-body simulations of dust trajectories under solar gravity, planetary perturbations, radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag and solar wind that compute flux and impact velocity distributions at Mars, Venus and Mercury.

If this is right

  • For Mercury the high-velocity tail affects impact processes and exosphere generation.
  • For Mars and Venus the flux-dominated low-velocity population determines meteoroid ablation rates and metal layer formation.
  • The calibrated fluxes provide quantitative inputs for comparison with future observations from different missions.
  • The results support modeling of impact-driven surface modification across the inner solar system.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The flux-velocity decoupling implies that velocity-dependent surface effects such as cratering or sputtering may be controlled by a minority of the dust population.
  • Extending the same simulation framework to include collisional destruction would test how robust the size distribution at the planets remains.
  • These fluxes could be combined with cometary dust models to produce a complete inner-solar-system dust budget for atmospheric and surface studies.
  • Direct comparison with impactor data from BepiColombo at Mercury would provide an independent check on the predicted high-velocity tail.

Load-bearing premise

The initial orbital elements, production rates and size distribution of dust ejected from main-belt asteroids are correctly represented and the included forces dominate the dynamics without significant unmodeled effects such as collisions.

What would settle it

An in-situ measurement at any inner planet that shows the high-velocity tail of impacts is not produced by high-eccentricity grains, or that the total flux deviates by more than 0.5 orders of magnitude from the calibrated values, would falsify the reported decoupling and agreement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12420 by Aanchal Sahu, Jayesh Pabari.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the geometry adopted to estimate the dust impact flux from close encounters. Dust particles originating from the asteroid belt are shown as small incoming trajectories migrating toward the Sun. The planet is located at its heliocentric distance aplanet; the solid black circle denotes the planetary Hill sphere, while the red dashed circle marks the adopted sphere of influence (SO… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Initial distribution of the dust particles in orbital element space. The left panel shows the inclination as a function of semimajor axis, with color indicating eccentricity. The right panel displays the perihelion distance as a function of semimajor axis, with color indicating inclination. The dashed horizontal lines mark the mean orbital distance and aphelion distance of Mars. Together, these panels illu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dependence of radiation pressure parameter βr (blue circles, left axis) and modified gravitational parameter gmsb (green squares, right axis) on particle radius. The dashed line indicates gmsb = 0, with the transition from negative to positive values occurring at s ≈ 0.2 µm. Small particles (s < 0.1 µm) show βr > 1, indicating radiation pressure dominance, while large particles (s > 1 µm) approach asymptot… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Time evolution of semi-major axis (top) and ec￾centricity (bottom) for asteroidal dust with radii of 100 µm (solid red line) and 30 µm (dashed blue line). The trajec￾tories correspond to individual particles arbitrarily selected from the simulation to illustrate characteristic dynamical be￾havior; similar trends are observed across the ensemble. rations. The recurrent resonance captures and the as￾sociated… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cumulative number of close encounters N(< R) with Mars as a function of minimum approach distance R for 150 µm dust grains. Blue points represent binned data, while the red curve shows the best-fit relation N(< R) = P0R 2 obtained through weighted least-squares fitting. The quadratic scaling confirms the geometric nature of encounters in three-dimensional space. The data correspond to encounters within ten… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Temporal evolution of close encounter frequency between 150 µm dust grains and Mars. Blue points denote the number of encounters per time bin, while the green shaded region highlights the effective interval (∆T), determined from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the distribution. This interval represents the period of statistically steady encounter rates used for flux calculation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Size frequency distribution of Earth-based calibration data. Dashed lines show individual flux measurements from LISA Pathfinder, asteroidal flux estimate of Carrillo-Sánchez et al. (2020), and Cremonese et al. (2012). The thick solid blue line represents the average flux used as the calibration reference. environment. For all bodies, the flux decreases mono￾tonically with increasing particle mass, spannin… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Simulated interplanetary dust particle flux as a function of particle mass for the terrestrial planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars. Solid and dashed curves represent spline-interpolated trends, while symbols denote discrete simulation outputs. from Phobos and Deimos) not included in our asteroidal￾only model. Previous dynamical and observational stud￾ies (D. Nesvorný et al. 2010; P. Pokorný et al. 2018… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Normalized impact velocity distributions of dust particles impacting Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars, obtained from N-body simulations. The curves represent kernel density estimates of the relative impact velocities at each planet. ported in previous studies e.g., M. J. Cintala (1992); J. D. Carrillo-Sánchez et al. (2020), although the latter find somewhat lower velocities for asteroidal particles of about… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Hexbin maps of velocity v as a function of orbital eccentricity e for IDPs impacting (a) Mars, (b) Earth, (c) Venus, and (d) Mercury. Colors indicate the logarithmic number of impact events per bin. A systematic increase in both the characteristic velocity and the velocity dispersion is observed toward the inner Solar System, together with the emergence of a dynamically excited high-eccentricity populatio… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Hexbin maps of velocity v as a function of orbital inclination i for IDPs impacting (a) Mars, (b) Earth, (c) Venus, and (d) Mercury. Colors indicate the logarithmic number of impact events per bin. More recent studies suggest that collisions can modify velocity distributions at terrestrial planets (P. Pokorný et al. 2018; P. Pokorný et al. 2024). We present the first joint characterization of dust–planet … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of dust–planet encounter velocities as a function of the longitude of perihelion, ϖ = Ω + ω, for Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars. Colors indicate the logarithmic number of close encounters in each hexagonal bin. While the distributions for Earth and Mars are nearly uniform in ϖ, pronounced structure is evident for Venus and especially Mercury, where high-velocity encounters preferentially occ… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Interplanetary dust in the inner solar system originates from multiple sources, including short-period comets and main-belt asteroids. In this work, we focus specifically on the dynamical evolution of asteroid-derived dust using N-body simulations that incorporates solar gravity, planetary perturbations, radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag and solar wind forces. We quantify dust fluxes for Mars, Venus and Mercury across an important mass range, which are essential inputs for ablation process on Mars/Venus and for contributing in the impact process on Mercury. We have also derived impact velocity distributions and compared with existing literature. In addition, we examine how close-encounter velocities depend on the orbital elements linking dust energetics directly to the orbital architecture of the dust population. Our results show that the calibrated asteroidal flux agrees excellently with the scaled Gr\"un model for Mars (0.04 orders of magnitude offset) and Venus (0.09 orders), and with the M\"uller (2002) model for Mercury (0.04 orders). The velocity distributions reveal a decoupling between flux and impact velocity: low-eccentricity grains dominate the flux, while high-eccentricity grains control the high-velocity tail. These findings have direct implications covering: (i) For atmosphere-less bodies like Mercury, the high-velocity tail affects impact processes and exosphere generation; (ii) For Mars and Venus, the flux-dominated low-velocity population determines meteoroid ablation rates and metal layer formation; (iii) Our calibrated fluxes provide inputs for comparison with future observations from different missions and also, for modeling impact-driven surface modification across the inner solar system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper uses N-body integrations to model the dynamical evolution of dust grains released from main-belt asteroids under solar gravity, planetary perturbations, radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag, and solar wind drag. It reports calibrated fluxes at Mercury, Venus, and Mars that match the scaled Grün model (0.04–0.09 dex offsets) and the Müller (2002) model, together with impact velocity distributions that exhibit a decoupling: low-eccentricity grains dominate the flux while high-eccentricity grains populate the high-velocity tail. Implications for ablation, exosphere generation, and surface modification are discussed.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold after addressing calibration and missing physics, the work supplies concrete flux and velocity inputs for inner-planet meteoroid models and mission planning. The N-body treatment of orbital-element dependence on encounter velocities is a clear strength, directly linking dust energetics to source architecture and yielding the reported flux-velocity decoupling.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and results: the reported 0.04–0.09 dex agreement with Grün/Müller models is obtained after introducing an overall dust-flux scaling factor. The manuscript must state the numerical value of this factor, demonstrate that it is fixed by independent physical constraints rather than tuned to the target models, and show how the quoted offsets change when the factor is varied within plausible bounds.
  2. [Methods] Methods / Dynamics section: the integrations include only gravitational, radiation-pressure, PR-drag, and solar-wind forces. For micron-to-millimeter grains at 2–3 AU the collisional lifetime is often comparable to or shorter than the PR-drag time; omitting collisions therefore implicitly assumes the initial size distribution survives intact. This assumption directly affects both the absolute normalization of the calibrated fluxes and the shape of the high-velocity tail; a quantitative estimate or test of the bias is required.
  3. [Results] Results: no error bars, convergence tests with respect to particle number or integration time, or sensitivity checks on initial orbital-element distributions or production rates are presented. These diagnostics are needed to establish that the reported decoupling between flux and velocity tail is robust rather than an artifact of the chosen ensemble.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Specify the exact mass/size range of the simulated grains and the functional form of the initial size distribution.
  2. [Methods] Add references for the precise implementation of solar-wind drag and radiation-pressure coefficients.
  3. [Results] Clarify whether the velocity distributions are reported at the planet’s Hill sphere or at the surface; the distinction matters for ablation versus impact calculations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report, which has helped us improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and results: the reported 0.04–0.09 dex agreement with Grün/Müller models is obtained after introducing an overall dust-flux scaling factor. The manuscript must state the numerical value of this factor, demonstrate that it is fixed by independent physical constraints rather than tuned to the target models, and show how the quoted offsets change when the factor is varied within plausible bounds.

    Authors: We agree that the scaling factor requires explicit documentation and justification. The factor (derived from matching the total dust production rate integrated over the main-belt asteroid size-frequency distribution and collisional ejection models in the literature) is independent of the Grün and Müller target models. In the revised manuscript we now state its numerical value, explain its physical basis, and include a sensitivity table showing how the reported dex offsets change when the factor is varied by ±30 %. These additions appear in the Methods and Results sections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods / Dynamics section: the integrations include only gravitational, radiation-pressure, PR-drag, and solar-wind forces. For micron-to-millimeter grains at 2–3 AU the collisional lifetime is often comparable to or shorter than the PR-drag time; omitting collisions therefore implicitly assumes the initial size distribution survives intact. This assumption directly affects both the absolute normalization of the calibrated fluxes and the shape of the high-velocity tail; a quantitative estimate or test of the bias is required.

    Authors: We acknowledge that collisions can modify the size distribution on timescales comparable to PR drag for some grain sizes. Our current model assumes a steady-state distribution sustained by continuous asteroid production. We have added a quantitative estimate in a new Methods subsection that compares collisional lifetimes (Grün et al. 1985 formalism) to PR-drag times across the simulated size range, indicating that the flux normalization may be overestimated by up to ~25 % for the largest grains while the high-velocity tail (dominated by smaller, higher-eccentricity particles) is less affected. A full collisional N-body treatment lies beyond the present scope but is noted as future work. This constitutes a partial revision. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Results] Results: no error bars, convergence tests with respect to particle number or integration time, or sensitivity checks on initial orbital-element distributions or production rates are presented. These diagnostics are needed to establish that the reported decoupling between flux and velocity tail is robust rather than an artifact of the chosen ensemble.

    Authors: We agree that these statistical and sensitivity diagnostics are necessary. In the revised manuscript we have added Poisson-based error bars to all flux and velocity histograms, performed convergence tests by increasing particle number and integration duration (showing <5 % variation in reported fluxes), and conducted sensitivity runs varying the initial eccentricity/inclination distributions and production-rate normalizations within observationally motivated ranges. The flux-velocity decoupling remains stable across all tests. These results are now presented in a dedicated “Robustness checks” subsection of the Results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Calibration of simulated asteroidal flux to Grün/Müller models renders reported agreement a fitted outcome

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Our results show that the calibrated asteroidal flux agrees excellently with the scaled Grün model for Mars (0.04 orders of magnitude offset) and Venus (0.09 orders), and with the Müller (2002) model for Mercury (0.04 orders)."

    The flux is first calibrated (scaled) against the target models; the subsequent claim of 'excellent agreement' with 0.04–0.09 dex offsets is then a direct consequence of that scaling rather than an a-priori prediction from the dynamics.

full rationale

The paper's central result is an N-body integration of dust dynamics under gravity, radiation pressure, PR drag and solar wind, followed by calibration of the output flux to match existing empirical models. The abstract explicitly labels the output as 'calibrated asteroidal flux' and then reports sub-0.1 dex offsets as 'excellent agreement.' This step reduces the claimed validation to a post-fit comparison rather than an independent prediction. No self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or self-definitional equations appear in the provided text; the remainder of the derivation (orbital-element dependence of velocity tails) is independent of the calibration.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard dynamical forces plus an explicit calibration step that scales the simulated dust population to match empirical models; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • overall dust flux scaling factor = adjusted to yield 0.04–0.09 order offsets
    The abstract states that the asteroidal flux is calibrated to produce the reported agreement with Grün and Müller models.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Main-belt asteroids supply a dominant or at least isolatable component of inner-solar-system dust whose initial conditions can be represented by the chosen orbital-element distribution.
    The simulation focuses exclusively on asteroid-derived dust and assumes the starting population is representative.
  • domain assumption Radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson drag, solar wind, and planetary gravity are sufficient to capture the long-term evolution without collisions or other unmodeled processes altering the flux.
    The listed forces are the only ones mentioned in the simulation description.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5598 in / 1585 out tokens · 190661 ms · 2026-05-13T02:58:51.689928+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dermott, S. F. and Grogan, K. and Gustafson, B. A. S. and Jayaraman, S. and Kortenkamp, S. J. and Xu, Y. L. , year =. Sources of Interplanetary Dust , volume =. International Astronomical Union Colloquium , doi =

    work page

  2. [2]

    Grün and H.A

    E. Grün and H.A. Zook and H. Fechtig and R.H. Giese , abstract =. Collisional balance of the meteoritic complex , journal =. 1985 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(85)90121-6 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(85)90121-6 1985

  3. [3]

    , year = 1918, month = oct, volume =

    Groups of asteroids probably of common origin. , year = 1918, month = oct, volume =. doi:10.1086/104299 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/104299 1918

  4. [4]

    Dermott, S. F. and Gomes, R. S. and Durda, D. D. and Gustafson, B. Å. S. and Jayaraman, S. and Xu, Y. L. and Nicholson, P. D. , year=. Dynamics of the Zodiacal Cloud , volume=. doi:10.1017/S007418090009135X , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/s007418090009135x

  5. [5]

    , year = 2013, month = nov, volume =

    Trapping and dynamical evolution of interplanetary dust particles in Earth s quasi-satellite resonance. , year = 2013, month = nov, volume =. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.08.020 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.08.020 2013

  6. [6]

    , keywords =

    Zodiacal dust bands: Their relation to asteroid families. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90117-R , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(90)90117-r

  7. [7]

    S. G. Love and D. E. Brownlee , title =. Science , volume =. 1993 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.262.5133.550 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.262.5133.550 1993

  8. [8]

    Mie scattering and thermal emission

    The zodiacal light from 1500 A to 60 micron. Mie scattering and thermal emission. , keywords =

    work page

  9. [9]

    Zook and Otto E

    Herbert A. Zook and Otto E. Berg , abstract =. A source for hyperbolic cosmic dust particles , journal =. 1975 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(75)90078-1 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0032-0633(75)90078-1 1975

  10. [10]

    , keywords =

    Orbital and physical characteristics of micrometeoroids in the inner solar system as observed by Helios 1. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0032-0633(80)90022-7 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/0032-0633(80)90022-7

  11. [11]

    and Cremonese, Gabriele and Marzari, F

    Borin, P. and Cremonese, Gabriele and Marzari, F. and Lucchetti, Alice , year =. Asteroidal and cometary dust flux in the inner solar system , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , doi =

    work page

  12. [12]

    , year = 1950, month = jan, volume =

    The Poynting-Robertson effect on meteor orbits. , year = 1950, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1086/145244 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/145244 1950

  13. [13]

    Burns and Philippe L

    Joseph A. Burns and Philippe L. Lamy and Steven Soter , abstract =. Radiation forces on small particles in the solar system , journal =. 1979 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(79)90050-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90050-2 1979

  14. [14]

    Gustafson and N.Y

    B.Å.S. Gustafson and N.Y. Misconi and E.T. Rusk , abstract =. Interplanetary dust dynamics: II. Poynting-Robertson drag and planetary perturbations on cometary dust , journal =. 1987 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(87)90053-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(87)90053-4 1987

  15. [15]

    Interplanetary dust dynamics: I

    Bo. Interplanetary dust dynamics: I. Long-term gravitational effects of the inner planets on zodiacal dust , journal =. 1986 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(86)90158-2 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90158-2 1986

  16. [16]

    , keywords =

    Orbital evolution of dust particles from comets and asteroids. , keywords =. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90057-E , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90057-e

  17. [17]

    Physics of the Inner Heliosphere I , year = 1990, editor =

    Interplanetary Dust. Physics of the Inner Heliosphere I , year = 1990, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75361-9_5 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75361-9_5 1990

  18. [18]

    Accretion of Interplanetary Dust Particles by the Earth , journal =

    Stephen J Kortenkamp and Stanley F Dermott , abstract =. Accretion of Interplanetary Dust Particles by the Earth , journal =. 1998 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1998.5994 , url =

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1998.5994 1998

  19. [19]

    , year =

    Molina-Cuberos, Gregorio and Lopez-Moreno, J.-J and Arnold, F. , year =. Meteoric Layers in Planetary Atmospheres , volume =. Space Science Reviews , doi =

    work page

  20. [20]

    Pabari and Srirag N

    Jayesh P. Pabari and Srirag N. Nambiar and Rashmi and Sonam Jitarwal , keywords =. Metallic ion layers in planetary atmosphere: Boundary conditions and IDP flux , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2022.105617 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2022.105617 2023

  21. [21]

    Pätzold and S

    M. Pätzold and S. Tellmann and B. Häusler and D. Hinson and R. Schaa and G. L. Tyler , title =. Science , volume =. 2005 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1117755 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1117755 2005

  22. [22]

    and Hinson, D

    Withers, Paul and Mendillo, M. and Hinson, D. P. and Cahoy, K. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013636 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2008JA013636 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1029/2008ja013636

  23. [23]

    Cole and Masayuki Fujii and Sunao Hasegawa and Takeo Iwai and Masanori Kobayashi and Ralf Srama and Hajime Yano , keywords =

    Takayuki Hirai and Michael J. Cole and Masayuki Fujii and Sunao Hasegawa and Takeo Iwai and Masanori Kobayashi and Ralf Srama and Hajime Yano , keywords =. Microparticle impact calibration of the Arrayed Large-Area Dust Detectors in INterplanetary space (ALADDIN) onboard the solar power sail demonstrator IKAROS , journal =. 2014 , note =. doi:https://doi....

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2014.05.009 2014

  24. [24]

    Krueger and E

    H. Krueger and E. Gruen and M. Baguhl and D. Bindschadler and S. Dermott and N. Divine and H. Fechtig and A. Graps and B. Gustafson and D. Hamilton and M Hanner and M. Horanyi and J. Kissel and Lindblad, \ Bertil Anders\ and D. Linkert and G. Linkert and McDonnell, \ J. A. M.\ and I. Mann and R. Moissl and G. Morfill and C. Polanskey and G. Schwehm and R....

    work page 2010

  25. [25]

    10.1051/0004-6361:20077682

    Evidence for dust accumulation just outside the orbit of Venus , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361:20077682", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20077682", journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077682

  26. [26]

    M. H. Jones and D. Bewsher and D. S. Brown , title =. Science , volume =. 2013 , doi =. https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1243194 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1243194 2013

  27. [27]

    Jones and D

    M.H. Jones and D. Bewsher and D.S. Brown , keywords =. Mapping the circumsolar dust ring near the orbit of Venus , journal =. 2017 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.01.015 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.01.015 2017

  28. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , volume=

    Pristine PSP/WISPR observations of the circumsolar dust ring near Venus's orbit , author=. The Astrophysical Journal , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Formation of Phobos/Deimos Dust Rings , journal =

    Hiroshi Ishimoto , abstract =. Formation of Phobos/Deimos Dust Rings , journal =. 1996 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1996.0116 , url =

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0116 1996

  30. [30]

    Pabari and P.J

    J.P. Pabari and P.J. Bhalodi , keywords =. Estimation of micrometeorites and satellite dust flux surrounding Mars in the light of MAVEN results , journal =. 2017 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2017.01.023 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2017.01.023 2017

  31. [31]

    Jorgensen, J. L. and Benn, M. and Connerney, J. E. P. and Denver, T. and Jorgensen, P. S. and Andersen, A. C. and Bolton, S. J. , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets , volume =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JE006509 , url =. https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2020JE006509 , note =

    work page doi:10.1029/2020je006509

  32. [32]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Pabari, J P , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1045 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1045 2023

  33. [33]

    Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement , year = 2002, month = jul, volume =

    Four-Year Observation of Interplanetary and Interstellar Dust by NOZOMI-MDC (Mars Dust Counter). Meteoritics and Planetary Science Supplement , year = 2002, month = jul, volume =

    work page 2002

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    An assessment of the meteoritic contribution to the Martian soil. , keywords =. doi:10.1029/JB095iB09p14497 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1029/jb095ib09p14497

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Dynamical evolution of interplanetary dust particles. , keywords =

    work page

  36. [36]

    Sykes, M. V. and Greenberg, R. , title =. Icarus , year =

    work page

  37. [37]

    Asteroids II , year = 1989, editor =

    Distribution of taxonomic classes and the compositional structure of the asteroid belt. Asteroids II , year = 1989, editor =

    work page 1989

  38. [38]

    and Knežević, Z

    Milani, A. and Knežević, Z. , title =. Icarus , year =

    work page

  39. [39]

    Sykes, M. V. and Grün, E. and Reach, W. T. and Jenniskens, P. , title =. Comets II , year =

    work page

  40. [40]

    Nature Geoscience , year = 2017, month = jun, volume =

    Detection of a persistent meteoric metal layer in the Martian atmosphere. Nature Geoscience , year = 2017, month = jun, volume =. doi:10.1038/ngeo2958 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1038/ngeo2958 2017

  41. [41]

    and others , title =

    Igenbergs, E. and others , title =. Journal of Geophysical Research , year =

    work page

  42. [42]

    and Bhalodi, P

    Pabari, Jayesh P. and Bhalodi, P. J. and Patel, D. K. , title =. Proceedings of the 47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference , year =

    work page

  43. [43]

    Zook and Stanley F

    Jer-Chyi Liou and Herbert A. Zook and Stanley F. Dermott , issn =. Kuiper Belt Dust Grains as a Source of Interplanetary Dust Particles , year =. Icarus , language =

    work page

  44. [44]

    Giese and B

    R.H. Giese and B. Kneissel and U. Rittich , abstract =. Three-dimensional models of the zodiacal dust cloud: A comparative study , journal =. 1986 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(86)90046-1 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(86)90046-1 1986

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Comparative Studies of Visible and IRAS Interplanetary Dust Bands. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/pasj/51.3.363 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/51.3.363

  46. [46]

    10.1051/0004-6361/202450069

    A solar rotation signature in cosmic dust: Frequency analysis of dust particle impacts on the Wind spacecraft , DOI= "10.1051/0004-6361/202450069", url= "https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450069", journal =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450069

  47. [47]

    , year = 1964, month = apr, volume =

    The Perturbation of Interplanetary Dust Grains by the Solar Wind. , year = 1964, month = apr, volume =. doi:10.1086/147829 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/147829 1964

  48. [48]

    1996 , issn =

    Collision Rates and Impact Velocities in the Trojan Asteroid Swarms , journal =. 1996 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/icar.1996.0011 , url =

    work page doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0011 1996

  49. [49]

    Everhart , title =

    E. Everhart , title =. Celestial Mechanics , year =. doi:10.1007/BF01261877 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01261877

  50. [50]

    Lorentz scattering of interplanetary dust , journal =

    Guy Consolmagno , abstract =. Lorentz scattering of interplanetary dust , journal =. 1979 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0019-1035(79)90195-7 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0019-1035(79)90195-7 1979

  51. [51]

    1995 , address =

    Hiroshi Ishimoto , title =. 1995 , address =

    work page 1995

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    Dust in the solar system and in extra-solar planetary systems. , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00159-006-0028-0 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-006-0028-0

  53. [53]

    Physical characteristics and occurrence rates of meteoric plasma layers detected in the Martian ionosphere by Mars Global Surveyor Radio Science Experiment , volume =

    Withers, Paul and Mendillo, Michael and Hinson, David and Cahoy, Kerri , year =. Physical characteristics and occurrence rates of meteoric plasma layers detected in the Martian ionosphere by Mars Global Surveyor Radio Science Experiment , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research , doi =

    work page

  54. [54]

    , keywords =

    Statistical analysis of the flux of micrometeoroids at Mercury from both cometary and asteroidal components (Corrigendum). , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526767e , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526767e

  55. [55]

    , keywords =

    Statistical analysis of micrometeoroids flux on Mercury. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912080 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912080

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    Solar wind pressure on interplanetary dust. , keywords =

    work page

  57. [57]

    2004 , edition=

    Orbital Motion , author=. 2004 , edition=. doi:10.1201/9780367806620 , url=

    work page doi:10.1201/9780367806620 2004

  58. [58]

    An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics , publisher=

    Fitzpatrick, Richard , year=. An Introduction to Celestial Mechanics , publisher=

    work page

  59. [59]

    Ionospheric layer induced by meteoric ionization in Titan's atmosphere , journal =

    G.J Molina-Cuberos and H Lammer and W Stumptner and K Schwingenschuh and H.O Rucker and J.J López-Moreno and R Rodrigo and T Tokano , keywords =. Ionospheric layer induced by meteoric ionization in Titan's atmosphere , journal =. 2001 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(00)00133-1 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0032-0633(00)00133-1 2001

  60. [60]

    IAU Colloquium 83: Dynamics of Comets: Their Origin and Evolution , year = 1985, editor =

    An efficient integrator that uses Gauss-Radau spacings. IAU Colloq. 83: Dynamics of Comets: Their Origin and Evolution , year = 1985, editor =. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5400-7_17 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-94-009-5400-7_17 1985

  61. [61]

    G. W. Hill , journal =. Researches in the Lunar Theory , urldate =

    work page

  62. [62]

    Pabari, Jayesh and Nambiar, Srirag and Singh, Rashmi and Jitarwal, Sonam and Bhardwaj, Anil and Praneeth, S. M. K. and Shah, Bhavik and Suthar, Pinal and Pandya, Shilpa and Rami, Jaimin and Kumar, Deepak and Singh, V. K. and Khandekar, Rahul and Singh, Rajesh Kumar and Sahu, Aanchal and Adalja, Hiteshkumr and Patel, Arpit , title =. Scientific Reports , year =

    work page

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    New Calibration of the Micrometeoroid Flux on Earth. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/L40 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/749/2/l40 2041

  64. [64]

    Science , keywords =

    Dust observations at orbital altitudes surrounding Mars. Science , keywords =. doi:10.1126/science.aad0398 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aad0398

  65. [65]

    Pabari and S.A

    J.P. Pabari and S.A. Haider and B.M. Pandya and R.K. Singh and A. Kumar and D.K. Patel and A. Bogavelly , keywords =. Orbital altitude dust at Mars, its implication and a prototype for its detection , journal =. 2018 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2018.06.008 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.pss.2018.06.008 2018

  66. [66]

    Bones and David Nesvorný and Petr Pokorný and Mehdi Benna and George J

    Juan Diego Carrillo-Sánchez and Juan Carlos Gómez-Martín and David L. Bones and David Nesvorný and Petr Pokorný and Mehdi Benna and George J. Flynn and John M.C. Plane , abstract =. Cosmic dust fluxes in the atmospheres of Earth, Mars, and Venus , journal =. 2020 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113395 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2019.113395 2020

  67. [67]

    , keywords =

    Impact-induced thermal effects in the lunar and mercurian regoliths. , keywords =. doi:10.1029/91JE02207 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1029/91je02207

  68. [68]

    Estimation of the dust flux near Mercury , journal =

    M Müller and S.F Green and N McBride and D Koschny and J.C Zarnecki and M.S Bentley , keywords =. Estimation of the dust flux near Mercury , journal =. 2002 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-0633(02)00048-X , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0032-0633(02)00048-x 2002

  69. [69]

    Adams and Michael E

    Konstantin Batygin and Fred C. Adams and Michael E. Brown and Juliette C. Becker , abstract =. The planet nine hypothesis , journal =. 2019 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2019.01.009 2019

  70. [70]

    , year =

    Mann, Ingrid and Czechowski, A. , year =. Dust observations from Parker Solar Probe: Dust ejection from the inner Solar System , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , doi =

    work page

  71. [71]

    Roig , keywords =

    David Nesvorný and David Vokrouhlický and Miroslav Brož and Fernando V. Roig , keywords =. Discovery of 63 new young asteroid families , journal =. 2026 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116768 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116768 2026

  72. [72]

    Implications for Hot Debris Disks

    Cometary Origin of the Zodiacal Cloud and Carbonaceous Micrometeorites. Implications for Hot Debris Disks. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/816 , archivePrefix =. 0909.4322 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/713/2/816

  73. [73]

    A reproducible method to determine the meteoroid mass index , volume =

    Pokorný, Petr and Brown, Peter , year =. A reproducible method to determine the meteoroid mass index , volume =. Astronomy & Astrophysics , doi =

    work page

  74. [74]

    Planck 2013 results. XIV. Zodiacal emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321562 , archivePrefix =. 1303.5074 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321562 2013

  75. [75]

    , keywords =

    Size Distribution of Small Grains in the Inner Zodiacal Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad8b27 , archivePrefix =. 2409.07411 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad8b27

  76. [76]

    , keywords =

    How Long-lived Grains Dominate the Shape of the Zodiacal Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/PSJ/ad2de8 , archivePrefix =. 2401.13776 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/ad2de8

  77. [77]

    Wilck and I

    M. Wilck and I. Mann , abstract =. Radiation pressure forces on “typical” interplanetary dust grains , journal =. 1996 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(95)00151-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/0032-0633(95)00151-4 1996

  78. [78]

    , keywords =

    In Situ Observations of Interplanetary Dust Variability in the Inner Heliosphere. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab799b , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab799b

  79. [79]

    , keywords =

    Novel Insights on the Dust Distribution in the Zodiacal Dust Cloud from PSP/WISPR Observations at Large Elongations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad58b6 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad58b6

  80. [80]

    , keywords =

    Collisional Evolution of the Inner Zodiacal Cloud. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/PSJ/abf928 , archivePrefix =. 2104.08217 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.3847/psj/abf928

Showing first 80 references.