pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12579 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-12 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Phase-resolved field-space distance bounds in ekpyrotic, bouncing and cyclic cosmologies

Marcin Postolak
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 05:06 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th
keywords ekpyrotic cosmologybouncing cosmologyfield space distanceLyth boundBKL anisotropynull energy conditionentropy conversionscale-invariant perturbations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ekpyrotic and bouncing cosmologies obey a total field-space distance budget that decomposes by phase and yields a lower bound on ε_ek.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a distance criterion for scalar field trajectories in ekpyrotic, bouncing and cyclic cosmologies as a non-inflationary analogue to the Lyth bound. It decomposes the invariant scalar distance into four successive phases—ekpyrotic smoothing, entropy-to-curvature conversion, the bounce, and post-bounce evolution—then imposes BKL anisotropy suppression and observational windows on residual isocurvature and non-Gaussianity. From this accounting the authors derive a master condition that sets a minimum value for the ekpyrotic parameter ε_ek in terms of the distance remaining after conversion and bounce. In the canonical contracting phase the criterion recovers the known small-field scaling while generalizing it to the full budget inequality. A sympathetic reader would care because the bound constrains viable models using geometric field-space considerations rather than potential shape alone.

Core claim

The background kinematics of ekpyrotic contraction fulfills a useful field-space distance budget. Resolving the invariant distance into ekpyrotic, conversion, bounce and post-bounce contributions and adding BKL suppression produces a master inequality that lower-bounds ε_ek by the leftover distance after conversion and bounce. The same framework yields a curvature constraint for scale-invariant entropy perturbations showing that small total distance together with the observed red tilt favors ultra-fast-roll ekpyrosis, sharp turns, short or strongly modified bounces, and significant negative sectional curvature of the scalar manifold.

What carries the argument

The phase-resolved field-space distance budget, which decomposes the invariant scalar distance into ekpyrotic smoothing, entropy conversion, bounce and post-bounce segments and supplies a master condition that lower-bounds ε_ek.

If this is right

  • ε_ek must exceed a value fixed by the distance remaining after conversion and the bounce contribution.
  • BKL anisotropy suppression requires a minimum contraction strength or duration in the ekpyrotic phase.
  • Scale-invariant entropy perturbations in curved field space together with small total distance and red tilt imply ultra-fast-roll behavior or modified bounces.
  • Phenomenological cutoff corrections and observational conversion windows further restrict allowed distance allocations across phases.
  • The total budget satisfies a generalized inequality that reduces to the known small-field scaling in the canonical limit.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bound could be tested directly with future limits on the tensor-to-scalar ratio once the conversion window is fixed by isocurvature data.
  • Cyclic models with repeated bounces would accumulate extra distance and therefore face stricter lower limits on ε_ek.
  • Allowing negative sectional curvature in the scalar manifold relaxes the bound and may permit slower-roll solutions consistent with observations.
  • If the distance budget is saturated, specific bounce constructions in string theory could be ruled out by precision CMB measurements of the tilt and non-Gaussianity.

Load-bearing premise

The concrete mechanism that violates or evades the null energy condition and the details of entropy-to-curvature conversion are taken as given and compatible with the assumed phase kinematics.

What would settle it

A measured tensor-to-scalar ratio and isocurvature amplitude that imply a total field excursion falling below the master-bound minimum for the observed spectral index would falsify the distance criterion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12579 by Marcin Postolak.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Phase-resolved field-space distance budget for a complete non-inflationary smoothing history. Ekpyrotic smoothing, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Allowed and excluded regions in the auxiliary-distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Minimum ekpyrotic fast-roll parameter as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Combined smoothing and BKL anisotropy bound shown as a two-parameter diagnostic. The panels scan the plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Combined smoothing and BKL anisotropy bound shown as a two-parameter diagnostic. The panels scan the plane [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Maximum symmetric-bounce duration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Maximum symmetric-bounce duration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Illustrative turn-rate conversion bound. The curves [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Indicative field-space curvature radius required by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Indicative field-space curvature radius required by the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Observable-to-budget diagnostic map. The scalar tilt and running constrain the entropy-sector load; isocurvature and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Canonical late-time scalar-field distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. CPL slope-hierarchy diagnostic in the canonical re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Toy model scalar-mediated bounce diagnostics for the ansatz [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The inflationary Lyth bound relates the primordial tensor amplitude to the inflaton field excursion. There is no analogous universal relationship in the case of ekpyrotic, bouncing, and cyclic models because scalar and tensor perturbations depend on entropy conversion, matching through the bounce and the specific mechanism that violates or evades the null energy condition. Nevertheless, the background kinematics fulfills a useful non-inflationary analogue: a field-space distance budget. In this study, we propose a phase-resolved distance criterion for a non-inflationary smoothing process and decompose the invariant scalar distance into ekpyrotic smoothing, entropy-to-curvature conversion, bounce, and post-bounce contributions. Then, we impose BKL anisotropy suppression as an additional constraint on the ekpyrotic phase. In the canonical phase of the ekpyrotic contraction, we recover the known small-field scaling and generalize it to total budget inequality. We impose three requirements: a BKL (Belinski-Khalatnikov-Lifshitz) anisotropy suppression that is parameterized separately, a phenomenological cutoff-corrected distance budget inspired by tower of states logic, and observational conversion windows from residual isocurvature and non-Gaussianity. Furthermore, we propose a new master condition that provides a lower bound on the value of the parameter $\epsilon_{\rm ek}$ that depends on the remaining distance available after conversion and the cosmological bounce. We also derive a curvature constraint for scale-invariant entropy perturbations in curved field space which shows that the small total distance and the observed red tilt seem to indicate ultra-fast-roll ekpyrosis, sharp turns, short or strongly modified bounces, and/or significant negative sectional curvature of the scalar manifold. Finally, we demonstrate methods for testing the distance budget against observational data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a phase-resolved field-space distance criterion for non-inflationary smoothing in ekpyrotic, bouncing, and cyclic cosmologies. It decomposes the invariant scalar distance into four sequential phases (ekpyrotic smoothing, entropy-to-curvature conversion, bounce, post-bounce), imposes BKL anisotropy suppression on the ekpyrotic segment, and incorporates a tower-inspired cutoff. From this budget the authors recover the known small-field scaling for canonical ekpyrosis and derive a new master condition that supplies a lower bound on ε_ek in terms of the residual distance after conversion and bounce. They also obtain a curvature constraint for scale-invariant entropy modes and outline tests against observational windows on isocurvature and non-Gaussianity.

Significance. If the distance additivity and phase kinematics hold, the master bound supplies a useful non-inflationary analogue to the Lyth relation, constraining the ekpyrotic parameter space and linking field-space geometry to observable spectral tilt and residual isocurvature. The explicit decomposition and BKL requirement are concrete strengths that could guide model-building once the bounce and conversion mechanisms are specified.

major comments (2)
  1. [master-condition derivation] The master condition (derived after the four-phase decomposition) treats the lengths of the entropy-to-curvature conversion and bounce intervals as fixed kinematic quantities independent of the concrete NEC-violating operator. If the bounce is realized by higher-derivative terms that deform the field-space metric or induce non-geodesic motion, the assumed additivity of the distance budget fails and the residual-distance term no longer supplies a model-independent lower bound on ε_ek.
  2. [BKL suppression and cutoff implementation] The phenomenological cutoff-corrected term in the distance budget is introduced via tower-of-states logic and observational conversion windows; because the cutoff scale is listed among the free parameters, the resulting lower bound on ε_ek risks circularity unless the cutoff is shown to be fixed by independent data rather than tuned to the target result.
minor comments (1)
  1. [phase decomposition] The notation for the invariant distance ds and the separate BKL suppression parameter should be introduced with an explicit equation before the decomposition is used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions have been made to clarify assumptions and strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The master condition (derived after the four-phase decomposition) treats the lengths of the entropy-to-curvature conversion and bounce intervals as fixed kinematic quantities independent of the concrete NEC-violating operator. If the bounce is realized by higher-derivative terms that deform the field-space metric or induce non-geodesic motion, the assumed additivity of the distance budget fails and the residual-distance term no longer supplies a model-independent lower bound on ε_ek.

    Authors: We agree that the additivity of the invariant scalar distance presupposes a fixed field-space metric and geodesic motion throughout the phases. Our derivation explicitly assumes standard kinetic terms and a non-deformed metric during the bounce, consistent with the canonical ekpyrotic and many bouncing constructions in the literature. For realizations involving higher-derivative operators that induce metric deformations or non-geodesic trajectories, the master condition would require model-specific corrections, as the referee notes. We have added a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript (Section 3.2) clarifying these assumptions, delineating the regime of validity, and noting that the bound remains useful as a conservative lower limit under the stated kinematic conditions. This does not claim universality beyond those assumptions. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The phenomenological cutoff-corrected term in the distance budget is introduced via tower-of-states logic and observational conversion windows; because the cutoff scale is listed among the free parameters, the resulting lower bound on ε_ek risks circularity unless the cutoff is shown to be fixed by independent data rather than tuned to the target result.

    Authors: The cutoff is introduced from the tower-of-states conjecture and is further anchored by independent observational constraints on residual isocurvature and non-Gaussianity (detailed in Section 4). To address potential circularity, we have revised the manuscript to fix the cutoff scale explicitly via the BKL anisotropy suppression requirement and the string scale, without reference to the final ε_ek bound. An explicit example is now provided showing how the cutoff is determined from the requirement that the ekpyrotic phase lasts long enough to suppress anisotropies, yielding a numerical value consistent with but independent of the master condition. This removes any tuning to the target result. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper decomposes the invariant field-space distance into four sequential phases (ekpyrotic smoothing, entropy-to-curvature conversion, bounce, post-bounce) and imposes external constraints (BKL anisotropy suppression, tower-inspired phenomenological cutoff, observational conversion windows) to obtain the master lower bound on ε_ek. These inputs are introduced as independent requirements rather than being fitted to or defined in terms of the target bound itself. The resulting inequality is a direct consequence of the additive distance budget under the stated assumptions; no step reduces the claimed result to its own outputs by construction, no self-citation chain is load-bearing for the central claim, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The derivation remains self-contained against the paper's own kinematic premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard domain assumptions of ekpyrotic cosmology plus two phenomenological inputs: a cutoff-corrected distance budget and observational conversion windows. No new particles or forces are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • ε_ek
    Ekpyrotic slow-roll parameter whose lower bound is the main output of the master condition.
  • cutoff scale
    Phenomenological cutoff introduced to correct the distance budget, inspired by tower-of-states logic.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption BKL anisotropy suppression must be achieved during the ekpyrotic phase
    Imposed as an additional constraint that limits the allowed field-space distance in the contracting phase.
  • domain assumption Observational windows on residual isocurvature and non-Gaussianity constrain the conversion phase
    Used to allocate part of the total distance budget to entropy-to-curvature conversion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5614 in / 1522 out tokens · 45696 ms · 2026-05-15T05:06:45.755147+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 58 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Mechanism-dependent interpretation of the bounce contributiond(B) b

    Ghost condensate and Galileon For a ghost condensate or Galileon bounces, the scalar field itself is responsible for the NEC-violating phase 8 TABLE I. Mechanism-dependent interpretation of the bounce contributiond(B) b . In scalar-mediated bounces it is a genuine field-space distance. In quantum-gravity-driven or thin-matching descriptions it is more acc...

  2. [2]

    derivative scalar-tensor operators

    DHOST and Horndeski For DHOST1 or Horndeski-type bounces, the relation between ˙H and the scalar velocity is modified by higher- 1 Degenerate Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor. derivative scalar-tensor operators. A useful schematic decomposition is: d(DHOST) b =d σ,b+d hd,(113) wheredσ,bis the direct scalar distance anddhd represents the cost of keeping the high...

  3. [3]

    LQC For a loop quantum cosmology-type effective bounce, the modified Friedmann equation is often written as [38, 9 39]: H2 = ρ 3M2 Pl ( 1−ρ ρc ) ,(114) with the effective Raychaudhuri equation of the form: ˙H=−(ρ+p) 2M2 Pl ( 1−2ρ ρc ) .(115) In the case of: ρ+p= ˙σ2,(116) comparison with(98) suggests the effective identification: ΞLQC(t) = 2ρ(t) ρc −1.(11...

  4. [4]

    5.f(R)theories Forf(R)or related modified gravity bounces, the dis- tance may reside in the gravitational sector rather than in a matter scalar [35, 36]

    Matter bounce and quintom Matter bounce or quintom-type realizations are closer to scalar-mediated bounces [33, 34], but the relevant dis- tance must be computed in the full target space of the fields responsible for the NEC-violating stage, namely: d(q) b = 1 MPl ∫ b √ GIJ ˙ϕI ˙ϕJdt.(119) This class is especially sensitive to ghost [54–56] or gradi- ent ...

  5. [5]

    Galilean Genesis and conformal Galileon Galilean Genesis or conformal Galileon transitions [32, 37] should also be distinguished from a canonical scalar bounce scenarios. They are naturally represented by: d(Gen) b =d (Gen) scalar +d (Gen) EFT .(123) The second term summarizes the requirements for strong coupling, cutoff, and higher-derivative stability. ...

  6. [6]

    CCC Conformal cyclic cosmology2 (CCC) [44–51] is a spe- cific type of cyclic cosmological model, but it does not involve a bounce in the usual metric sense. Rather than a local transition characterized by the bounce condition, the future conformal infinity of one aeon is identified with the conformally rescaled Big Bang of the next aeon. Con- sequently, t...

  7. [7]

    Addressing observational tensions in cosmol- ogy with systematics and fundamental physics (Cosmo- Verse)

    S-brane and thin-matching In an S-brane or thin-matching description [9, 40–43], the scalar field-space distance consumed during the tran- sition may be negligible: d(S) b ≃0.(127) However, the cost of the bounce is shifted to the require- ment that the matching conditions generate stable and observationally viable scalar and tensor transfer functions. Th...

  8. [8]

    D. H. Lyth, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1861 (1997), arXiv:hep- ph/9606387

    work page arXiv 1997

  9. [9]

    A Field Range Bound for General Single-Field Inflation

    D. Baumann and D. Green, JCAP05, 017, arXiv:1111.3040 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    The Ekpyrotic Universe: Colliding Branes and the Origin of the Hot Big Bang

    J. Khoury, B. A. Ovrut, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, Phys. Rev. D64, 123522 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0103239

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  11. [11]

    P. J. Steinhardt and N. Turok, Phys. Rev. D65, 126003 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0111098

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  12. [12]

    Ekpyrotic and Cyclic Cosmology

    J.-L. Lehners, Phys. Rept.465, 223 (2008), arXiv:0806.1245 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  13. [13]

    A Critical Review of Classical Bouncing Cosmologies

    D. Battefeld and P. Peter, Phys. Rept.571, 1 (2015), arXiv:1406.2790 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Postolak, Did the Big Bang and cosmic inflation re- ally happen? (A tale of alternative cosmological models) (2024), arXiv:2404.18503 [physics.pop-ph]

    M. Postolak, Did the Big Bang and cosmic inflation re- ally happen? (A tale of alternative cosmological models) (2024), arXiv:2404.18503 [physics.pop-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    L. A. Boyle, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, Phys. Rev. D69, 127302 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0307170

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  16. [16]

    Brandenberger and Z

    R. Brandenberger and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. D101, 063522 (2020), arXiv:2001.00638 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Ilyas, M

    A. Ilyas, M. Zhu, Y. Zheng, and Y.-F. Cai, JHEP01, 141, arXiv:2009.10351 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2009

  18. [18]

    M. Zhu, A. Ilyas, Y. Zheng, Y.-F. Cai, and E. N. Saridakis, JCAP11(11), 045, arXiv:2108.01339 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv

  19. [19]

    Small-Field and Scale-Free: Inflation and Ekpyrosis at their Extremes

    J.-L. Lehners, JCAP11, 001, arXiv:1807.05240 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  20. [20]

    Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation

    C. Gordon, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett, and R. Maartens, Phys. Rev. D63, 023506 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0009131

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  21. [21]

    A covariant approach to general field space metric in multi-field inflation

    J.-O. Gong and T. Tanaka, JCAP03, 015, [Erratum: JCAP 02, E01 (2012)], arXiv:1101.4809 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    Geometrical Destabilization of Inflation

    S. Renaux-Petel and K. Turzyński, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 141301 (2016), arXiv:1510.01281 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    V. A. Belinsky, I. M. Khalatnikov, and E. M. Lifshitz, Adv. Phys.19, 525 (1970)

    1970

  24. [24]

    J. K. Erickson, D. H. Wesley, P. J. Steinhardt, and N. Turok, Phys. Rev. D69, 063514 (2004), arXiv:hep- th/0312009

    work page arXiv 2004

  25. [25]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Nucl. Phys. B766, 21 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0605264

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  26. [26]

    Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland

    H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu, and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 788, 180 (2019), arXiv:1810.05506 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    The Swampland: Introduction and Review

    E. Palti, Fortsch. Phys.67, 1900037 (2019), arXiv:1903.06239 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Isocurvature perturbations in the Ekpyrotic universe

    A. Notari and A. Riotto, Nucl. Phys. B644, 371 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0205019

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  29. [29]

    Lehners, P

    J.-L. Lehners, P. McFadden, N. Turok, and P. J. Stein- hardt, Phys. Rev. D76, 103501 (2007), arXiv:hep- th/0702153

    work page arXiv 2007

  30. [30]

    E. I. Buchbinder, J. Khoury, and B. A. Ovrut, Phys. Rev. D76, 123503 (2007), arXiv:hep-th/0702154. 22

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  31. [31]

    K. A. Malik and D. Wands, Phys. Rept.475, 1 (2009), arXiv:0809.4944 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  32. [32]

    Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A10 (2020), arXiv:1807.06211 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    Ekpyrotic Non-Gaussianity -- A Review

    J.-L. Lehners, Adv. Astron.2010, 903907 (2010), arXiv:1001.3125 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  34. [34]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity

    Y. Akramiet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A9 (2020), arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems

    R. Brandenberger and P. Peter, Found. Phys.47, 797 (2017), arXiv:1603.05834 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  36. [36]

    Ghost Condensation and a Consistent Infrared Modification of Gravity

    N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, M. A. Luty, and S. Muko- hyama, JHEP05, 074, arXiv:hep-th/0312099

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  37. [37]

    Y.-F. Cai, D. A. Easson, and R. Brandenberger, JCAP 08, 020, arXiv:1206.2382 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Cosmological Perturbations Through a Non-Singular Ghost-Condensate/Galileon Bounce

    L. Battarra, M. Koehn, J.-L. Lehners, and B. A. Ovrut, JCAP07, 007, arXiv:1404.5067 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Ijjas and P

    A. Ijjas and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 121304 (2016), arXiv:1606.08880 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Bouncing Cosmologies

    M. Novello and S. E. P. Bergliaffa, Phys. Rept.463, 127 (2008), arXiv:0802.1634 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  41. [41]

    R. H. Brandenberger, The Matter Bounce Alternative to Inflationary Cosmology (2012), arXiv:1206.4196 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  42. [42]

    T. P. Sotiriou, Class. Quant. Grav.23, 5117 (2006), arXiv:gr-qc/0604028

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  43. [43]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 451 (2010), arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  44. [44]

    T. Qiu, J. Evslin, Y.-F. Cai, M. Li, and X. Zhang, JCAP 10, 036, arXiv:1108.0593 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Loop Quantum Cosmology: A Status Report

    A. Ashtekar and P. Singh, Class. Quant. Grav.28, 213001 (2011), arXiv:1108.0893 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  46. [46]

    Non-singular bounce scenarios in loop quantum cosmology and the effective field description

    Y.-F. Cai and E. Wilson-Ewing, JCAP03, 026, arXiv:1402.3009 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    Gutperle and A

    M. Gutperle and A. Strominger, JHEP04, 018, arXiv:hep- th/0202210

    work page arXiv

  48. [48]

    S-brane to thermal non-singular string cosmology

    C. Kounnas, H. Partouche, and N. Toumbas, Class. Quant. Grav.29, 095014 (2012), arXiv:1111.5816 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  49. [49]

    R. H. Brandenberger, C. Kounnas, H. Partouche, S. P. Patil, and N. Toumbas, JCAP03, 015, arXiv:1312.2524 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  50. [50]

    Brandenberger and Z

    R. Brandenberger and Z. Wang, Phys. Rev. D102, 023516 (2020), arXiv:2004.06437 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Penrose, SINGULARITIES AND TIME ASYMME- TRY, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Sur- vey(1980) pp

    R. Penrose, SINGULARITIES AND TIME ASYMME- TRY, inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Sur- vey(1980) pp. 581–638

    1980

  52. [52]

    Penrose, Conf

    R. Penrose, Conf. Proc. C060626, 2759 (2006)

    2006

  53. [53]

    Penrose,Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe(The Bodley Head, London, 2010)

    R. Penrose,Cycles of Time: An Extraordinary New View of the Universe(The Bodley Head, London, 2010)

    2010

  54. [54]

    Penrose, AIP Conf

    R. Penrose, AIP Conf. Proc.1446, 233 (2012)

    2012

  55. [55]

    The equations of CCC

    P. Tod, Gen. Rel. Grav.47, 17 (2015), arXiv:1309.7248 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    K. A. Meissner and P. Nurowski, Phys. Rev. D95, 084016 (2017), arXiv:1506.03280 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  57. [57]

    Markwell and C

    O. Markwell and C. Stevens, Gen. Rel. Grav.55, 93 (2023), arXiv:2212.06914 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [58]

    K. A. Meissner and R. Penrose, The Physics of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology (2025), arXiv:2503.24263 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Generic instabilities of non-singular cosmologies in Horndeski theory: a no-go theorem

    T. Kobayashi, Phys. Rev. D94, 043511 (2016), arXiv:1606.05831 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  60. [60]

    Y. Cai, Y. Wan, H.-G. Li, T. Qiu, and Y.-S. Piao, JHEP 01, 090, arXiv:1610.03400 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  61. [61]

    S. M. Carroll, M. Hoffman, and M. Trodden, Phys. Rev. D68, 023509 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0301273

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  62. [62]

    J. M. Cline, S. Jeon, and G. D. Moore, Phys. Rev. D70, 043543 (2004), arXiv:hep-ph/0311312

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  63. [63]

    Y.-F. Cai, E. N. Saridakis, M. R. Setare, and J.-Q. Xia, Phys. Rept.493, 1 (2010), arXiv:0909.2776 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  64. [64]

    Generalized Galileons: instabilities of bouncing and Genesis cosmologies and modified Genesis

    M. Libanov, S. Mironov, and V. Rubakov, JCAP08, 037, arXiv:1605.05992 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  65. [65]

    Y.-F. Cai, R. Brandenberger, and P. Peter, Class. Quant. Grav.30, 075019 (2013), arXiv:1301.4703 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  66. [66]

    T. Qiu, X. Gao, and E. N. Saridakis, Phys. Rev. D88, 043525 (2013), arXiv:1303.2372 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  67. [67]

    Penrose, Gen

    R. Penrose, Gen. Rel. Grav.28, 581 (1996)

    1996

  68. [68]

    Penrose, Found

    R. Penrose, Found. Phys.44, 557 (2014)

    2014

  69. [69]

    Penrose, Found

    R. Penrose, Found. Phys.44, 873 (2014)

    2014

  70. [70]

    Penrose,Fashion, Faith, and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe(Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2024)

    R. Penrose,Fashion, Faith, and Fantasy in the New Physics of the Universe(Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 2024)

    2024

  71. [71]

    E. J. Copeland, A. R. Liddle, and D. Wands, Phys. Rev. D57, 4686 (1998), arXiv:gr-qc/9711068

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  72. [72]

    P. J. Steinhardt, N. Turok, and N. Turok, Science296, 1436 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0111030

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  73. [73]

    Postolak, Non-minimally coupled scalar field dark sector of the universe: in-depth (Einstein frame) case study (2025), arXiv:2505.07456 [gr-qc]

    M. Postolak, Non-minimally coupled scalar field dark sector of the universe: in-depth (Einstein frame) case study (2025), arXiv:2505.07456 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Branden- berger, Phys. Rept.215, 203 (1992)

    1992

  75. [75]

    R. H. Brandenberger, Lect. Notes Phys.646, 127 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0306071

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  76. [76]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  77. [77]

    Non-Gaussian Density Fluctuations from Entropically Generated Curvature Perturbations in Ekpyrotic Models

    J.-L. Lehners and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. D77, 063533 (2008), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 79, 129903 (2009)], arXiv:0712.3779 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  78. [78]

    Iarygina, M

    O. Iarygina, M. C. D. Marsh, and G. Salinas, JCAP03, 014, arXiv:2303.14156 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv

  79. [79]

    An Observational Test of Two-field Inflation

    D. Wands, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D66, 043520 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0205253

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  80. [80]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.