pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12767 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-12 · ⚛️ physics.atom-ph · hep-ex· nucl-ex

Recognition: unknown

Radioactive Molecules as Laboratories of Fundamental Physics

A. Jadbabaie, A. M. Jayich, J. T. Singh, N. R. Hutzler, R.F. Garcia Ruiz, S. Ebadi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 19:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.atom-ph hep-exnucl-ex
keywords radioactive moleculesnew physicsbeyond the Standard Modelprecision measurementsmolecular spectroscopynuclear enhancementsfundamental symmetrieselectric dipole moment
0
0 comments X

The pith

Radioactive molecules serve as sensitive new laboratories for detecting physics beyond the Standard Model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that radioactive molecules create a new experimental platform for hunting new physics by pairing large nuclear enhancements with the precise control and measurement possible in molecular systems. This approach reaches energy scales and interaction types that complement those accessible at high-energy colliders, using smaller-scale apparatus. Rapid gains in producing radioactive species, trapping them, and modeling their properties are making the required precision feasible. A reader would care because the method opens an accessible route to test fundamental symmetries and search for new particles or forces without relying solely on massive accelerators.

Core claim

Radioactive molecules provide a powerful new platform in the search for new physics at energy scales complementary to high-energy particle colliders. By combining enhancements from nuclear properties with the sensitivity and control offered by molecular structure, experiments with radioactive molecules offer great reach in the search for new physics beyond the Standard Model. Rapid progress is driven by advances in production and control of these molecules together with new experimental tools and theoretical techniques.

What carries the argument

The pairing of nuclear enhancements (such as large moments from unstable nuclei) with molecular structure that enables laser cooling, trapping, and high-precision spectroscopy.

If this is right

  • Searches for the electron electric dipole moment gain reach through nuclear enhancements inside molecules.
  • Precision tests of parity violation and other symmetry violations become feasible in new systems.
  • Limits can be placed on new forces or particles at intermediate energy scales not covered by colliders.
  • Interdisciplinary techniques from nuclear physics, atomic physics, and particle physics converge to improve overall measurement precision.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Radioactive-beam facilities may shift toward dual-use roles that include fundamental-physics tests alongside nuclear-structure studies.
  • The same molecular-control methods could be adapted to other exotic isotopes or highly charged ions for similar symmetry tests.
  • Success would motivate systematic calculations of molecular properties for a wider range of radioactive species to guide experiment design.

Load-bearing premise

Ongoing advances in production, control, and theoretical modeling of radioactive molecules will reach the sensitivity needed to detect or constrain new physics effects.

What would settle it

An experiment showing that nuclear enhancements in molecules yield no meaningful sensitivity gain over atomic systems once realistic backgrounds and theoretical uncertainties are included.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.12767 by A. Jadbabaie, A. M. Jayich, J. T. Singh, N. R. Hutzler, R.F. Garcia Ruiz, S. Ebadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: By combining the molecular enhancement (left) due to the extreme electromagnetic environment inside polar molecules, with the nuclear enhancement (right) offered by heavy, octupole-deformed nuclei, we can realize significant experimental enhancements to intrinsic CPV sensitivity. Octupole-deformed nucleus image reproduced from Ref.28 . precision measurements can indirectly probe much higher energy scales b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Quadrupole and octupole deformation across the nuclear chart. The deformation parameters β2 and β3 characterize deviations of a nucleus from spherical symmetry. The quadrupole parameter β2 corresponds to elongated (prolate) or flattened (oblate) shapes, respectively. The octupole parameter β3 describes pear-like shapes that do not exhibit reflection symmetry. Figure modified from65 . some recent progress a… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic representation of a diatomic molecule and sources of CP-violation (CPV) among its constituents. Electrons interact with the nucleus primarily via electromagnetic and weak forces, and electron EDM experiments primarily probe leptonic CPV. Inside nuclei, additional complex interactions occur among protons and neutrons, as well as their fundamental building blocks—quarks and gluons—through a combina… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Hadronic EDM Limits. Prospects for probing new physics with radioactive molecules (pink stars), in comparison to current LHC limits (horizontal faded band) and previous hadronic EDM measurements. Hadronic enhancement factors in eq. 5 (see also Supplemental Material) are estimated by geometric means of the values in Ref.50. Left: one- and two-loop limits on the new physics energy scale, ΛNP, obtained from a… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Emerging tools for precision measurements with radioactive molecules. Clockwise from top left: i) Cartoon of a vial containing a compound of radioactive material obtained from an isotope production facility82–84; ii) Initial spectroscopy to determine molecular structure is essential for any high-precision experiment40, 85–88; iii) Cryogenic buffer gas cells89 for radioactive molecule production42; iv) Radi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Radioactive molecules provide a powerful new platform in the search for new physics at energy scales complementary to high-energy particle colliders. By combining enhancements from nuclear properties with the sensitivity and control offered by molecular structure, experiments with radioactive molecules offer great reach in the search for new physics beyond the Standard Model. Rapid progress in this field is being driven by advances in the production and control of radioactive molecules, alongside the development of new experimental tools and theoretical techniques. In this Perspective, we discuss the current status and future prospects of this rapidly developing, interdisciplinary field at the intersection of nuclear physics, atomic and molecular physics, and particle physics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a Perspective article arguing that radioactive molecules constitute a powerful new platform for searches of physics beyond the Standard Model. By combining nuclear enhancements (e.g., from radioactive nuclei) with the precision control and sensitivity afforded by molecular structure, such systems can probe energy scales complementary to those accessible at high-energy colliders. The text reviews the current experimental and theoretical status, highlights rapid progress driven by advances in production, control, and modeling, and outlines future prospects at the intersection of nuclear, atomic/molecular, and particle physics.

Significance. If the prospective claims hold, the work identifies an emerging interdisciplinary direction that could meaningfully extend the reach of fundamental physics searches. Radioactive molecules offer potential sensitivity gains from nuclear properties within controllable molecular environments, complementing accelerator-based efforts. As a timely overview, it may help coordinate efforts across communities and stimulate targeted experiments and theory development.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'great reach' is qualitative; adding one or two concrete sensitivity projections (e.g., for EDMs or scalar interactions) drawn from the cited literature would make the central claim more precise without altering the perspective format.
  2. The discussion of future prospects would benefit from a short table or bullet list of near-term milestones (e.g., specific molecules, facilities, or precision targets) to render the forward-looking statements more actionable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our Perspective article and for recommending minor revision. The review correctly identifies the manuscript's focus on radioactive molecules as a complementary platform for beyond-Standard-Model searches, leveraging nuclear enhancements within molecular systems. We appreciate the recognition of rapid progress in the field and its interdisciplinary value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: perspective summarizes external advances without internal reductions

full rationale

This manuscript is a forward-looking Perspective article. It contains no new derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions that reduce by construction to inputs defined within the paper. All technical claims about sensitivity, enhancements, and experimental reach are framed as depending on ongoing external progress in production, control, and theory (explicitly stated as such in the abstract and discussion). No self-citation is load-bearing for a central result, no ansatz is smuggled, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked from the authors' prior work. The structure is a review of the field status rather than a closed derivation chain, making the reader's assessment of score 1.0 conservative; the proper finding under the stated rules is zero circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Perspective article with no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities introduced by the authors.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5422 in / 923 out tokens · 25615 ms · 2026-05-14T19:23:48.018354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

150 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    & Shaposhnikov, M

    Canetti, L., Drewes, M. & Shaposhnikov, M. Matter and antimatter in the universe.New J. Phys.14, 095012 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    Sakharov, A. D. Violation of CP Invariance, C asymmetry, and baryon asymmetry of the universe. JETP Lett.5, 24–27 (1967). Originally published in Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 5, 32–35 (1967)

    1967

  3. [3]

    & White, G

    de Vries, J., Postma, M., van de Vis, J. & White, G. Electroweak baryogenesis and the standard model effective field theory.J. High Energy Phys.2018(2018). 15/28

    2018

  4. [4]

    Phys.13, 391–396, DOI: 10.1038/nphys4021 (2017)

    Aaij, R.et al.Measurement of matter–antimatter differences in beauty baryon decays.Nat. Phys.13, 391–396, DOI: 10.1038/nphys4021 (2017)

    work page doi:10.1038/nphys4021 2017

  5. [5]

    & Wudka, J

    Bar-Shalom, S., Soni, A. & Wudka, J. Theoretical underpinnings of CP-violation at the high-energy frontier.Phys. Lett. B860, 139135, DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139135

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139135 2024

  6. [6]

    H., Petrov, A

    Artuso, M., Bernstein, R. H., Petrov, A. A. & et al. Report of the frontier for rare processes and precision measurements.arXiv preprint(2022). 2210.04765

    work page arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    S.et al.Search for new physics with atoms and molecules.Rev

    Safronova, M. S.et al.Search for new physics with atoms and molecules.Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 025008, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025008 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.025008 2018

  8. [8]

    E., Fierlinger, P., Ramsey-Musolf, M

    Chupp, T. E., Fierlinger, P., Ramsey-Musolf, M. J. & Singh, J. T. Electric dipole moments of atoms, molecules, nuclei, and particles.Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015001, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015001 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.015001 2019

  9. [9]

    & Straub, D

    Isidori, G. & Straub, D. M. Minimal flavour violation and beyond.The Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1–14, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2103-1 (2012)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-2103-1 2012

  10. [10]

    & Thomsen, A

    Greljo, A., Palavri´c, A. & Thomsen, A. E. Adding Flavor to the SMEFT.J. High Energy Phys.2022, 1–58, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP10(2022)005 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2022)005 2022

  11. [11]

    Effective Field Theory.Annu

    Georgi, H. Effective Field Theory.Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.43, 209–252, DOI: 10.1146/annurev. ns.43.120193.001233 (1993)

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev 1993

  12. [12]

    Manohar, A. V . Introduction to Effective Field Theories. In Davidson, S., Gambino, P., Laine, M., Neubert, M. & Salomon, C. (eds.)Effective Field Theory in Particle Physics and Cosmology: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 108, July 2017, DOI: 10.1093/oso/ 9780198855743.003.0002 (Oxford University Press, 2020). 13.Hammer, H.-W., König...

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/ 2017

  13. [13]

    & Wyler, D

    Isidori, G., Wilsch, F. & Wyler, D. The standard model effective field theory at work.Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 015006, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.96.015006 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.96.015006 2024

  14. [14]

    Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics

    Pospelov, M. & Ritz, A. Electric dipole moments as probes of new physics.Annals Phys.318, 119–169, DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2005.04.002 (2005). hep-ph/0504231

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.04.002 2005

  15. [15]

    Engel, J., Ramsey-Musolf, M. J. & Van Kolck, U. Electric dipole moments of nucleons, nuclei, and atoms: The Standard Model and beyond.Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.71, 21–74, DOI: 10.1016/j.ppnp. 2013.03.003 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp 2013

  16. [16]

    Alarcon, R.et al.Electric dipole moments and the search for new physics.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08103(2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Reexamination of the standard model nucleon electric dipole moment.Phys

    Seng, C.-Y . Reexamination of the standard model nucleon electric dipole moment.Phys. Rev. C91, 025502, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.91.025502 (2015). 16/28

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.025502 2015

  18. [18]

    & Yousif, A

    Dragos, J., Luu, T., Shindler, A., de Vries, J. & Yousif, A. Confirming the Existence of the strong CP Problem in Lattice QCD with the Gradient Flow.Phys. Rev. C103, 015202 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    & Pospelov, M

    Ema, Y ., Gao, T. & Pospelov, M. Standard Model Prediction for Paramagnetic Electric Dipole Moments.Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 231801, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.231801 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.231801 2022

  20. [20]

    TASI lectures on the strong CP problem and axions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02669 (2018)

    Hook, A. TASI lectures on the strong CP problem and axions.arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.02669 (2018)

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    Abel, C.et al.Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron.Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 081803, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.081803 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.081803 2020

  22. [22]

    & Sutherland, D

    De Vries, J., Draper, P., Fuyuto, K., Kozaczuk, J. & Sutherland, D. Indirect signs of the Peccei-Quinn mechanism.Phys. Rev. D99, 015042 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Peccei, R. D. & Quinn, H. R. CP conservation in the presence of pseudoparticles.Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1440–1443, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440 (1977)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 1977

  24. [24]

    Kim, J. E. & Carosi, G. Axions and the Strong CP Problem.Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 557–601, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.557 (2010)

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.557 2010

  25. [25]

    & Lillard, B

    de Vries, J., Draper, P., Fuyuto, K., Kozaczuk, J. & Lillard, B. Uncovering an axion mechanism with the EDM portfolio.Phys. Rev. D104, 055039 (2021). 27.Adams, C.et al.Axion dark matter.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.14923(2022)

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    P.et al.Studies of pear-shaped nuclei using accelerated radioactive beams.Nature497, 199–204, DOI: 10.1038/nature12073 (2013)

    Gaffney, L. P.et al.Studies of pear-shaped nuclei using accelerated radioactive beams.Nature497, 199–204, DOI: 10.1038/nature12073 (2013)

    work page doi:10.1038/nature12073 2013

  27. [27]

    Cairncross, W. B. & Ye, J. Atoms and molecules in the search for time-reversal symmetry violation. Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 510–521 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    R., Rey, A

    DeMille, D., Hutzler, N. R., Rey, A. M. & Zelevinsky, T. Quantum sensing and metrology for fundamental physics with molecules.Nat. Phys.20, 741–749, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-024-02499-9 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02499-9 2024

  29. [29]

    S.et al.An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment.Science381, 46–50, DOI: 10.1126/science.adg4084 (2023)

    Roussy, T. S.et al.An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment.Science381, 46–50, DOI: 10.1126/science.adg4084 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adg4084 2023

  30. [30]

    Andreevet al.Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron.Nature562, 355–360, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0599-8 (2018)

    V . Andreevet al.Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron.Nature562, 355–360, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0599-8 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0599-8 2018

  31. [31]

    & Reece, M

    Cesarotti, C., Lu, Q., Nakai, Y ., Parikh, A. & Reece, M. Interpreting the electron EDM constraint.J. High Energy Phys.2019, 59, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2019)059 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2019)059 2019

  32. [32]

    & Riembau, M

    Panico, G., Pomarol, A. & Riembau, M. EFT approach to the electron electric dipole moment at the two-loop level.J. High Energy Phys.2019, 1–32, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP04(2019)090 (2019). 17/28

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2019)090 2019

  33. [33]

    & Stamou, E

    Brod, J. & Stamou, E. Electric dipole moment constraints on CP-violating heavy-quark Yukawas at next-to-leading order.J. High Energy Phys.2021, 1–35, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2021)080

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2021)080 2021

  34. [34]

    Bahl, H.et al.Constraining the CP Structure of Higgs-fermion Couplings with a Global LHC Fit, the Electron EDM and Baryogenesis.The Eur. Phys. J. C82, 1–30, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10528-1 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2022

  35. [35]

    & Weiler, A

    Kley, J., Theil, T., Venturini, E. & Weiler, A. Electric dipole moments at one-loop in the dimension-6 SMEFT.The Eur. Phys. J. C82, 1–43, DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10861-5 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10861-5 2022

  36. [36]

    & Mereghetti, E

    Kumar, J. & Mereghetti, E. Electric dipole moments in 5+3 flavor weak effective theory.J. High Energy Phys.2024, 1–59 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    & Valori, N

    Ardu, M. & Valori, N. The equivalent Electric Dipole Moment in SMEFT.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.21920(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Garcia Ruiz, R.et al.Spectroscopy of short-lived radioactive molecules.Nature581, 396–400, DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2299-4 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2299-4 2020

  39. [39]

    Phys.87, 084301, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ad1e39 (2024)

    Arrowsmith-Kron, G.et al.Opportunities for fundamental physics research with radioactive molecules.Reports on Prog. Phys.87, 084301, DOI: 10.1088/1361-6633/ad1e39 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/ad1e39 2024

  40. [40]

    J.et al.Production and spectroscopy of cold radioactive molecules.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.08368(2025)

    Conn, C. J.et al.Production and spectroscopy of cold radioactive molecules.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.08368(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Auerbach, N., Flambaum, V . V . & Spevak, V . Collective T- and P-Odd Electromagnetic Moments in Nuclei with Octupole Deformations.Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4316–4319, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76. 4316 (1996)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76 1996

  42. [42]

    Hutzler, N. R. Polyatomic molecules as quantum sensors for fundamental physics.Quantum Sci. Technol.5, 044011 (2020)

    2020

  43. [43]

    Anderegg, L.et al.Quantum control of trapped polyatomic molecules for eedm searches.Science 382, 665–668, DOI: 10.1126/science.adg8155 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adg8155 2023

  44. [44]

    Takahashi, Y .et al.Engineered molecular clock transitions for symmetry violation searches.arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.06787(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Schiff, L. I. Measurability of Nuclear Electric Dipole Moments.Phys. Rev.132, 2194, DOI: 10/cx6nrx (1963)

    1963

  46. [46]

    & Ginges, J

    Flambaum, V . & Ginges, J. Nuclear Schiff moment and time-invariance violation in atoms.Phys. Rev. A65, 1–9, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032113 (2002)

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.65.032113 2002

  47. [47]

    P., Ramsey-Musolf, M

    Liu, C.-P. P., Ramsey-Musolf, M. J., Haxton, W. C., Timmermans, R. G. E. & Dieperink, A. E. L. Atomic electric dipole moments: The Schiff theorem and its corrections.Phys. Rev. C76, 1–16, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.035503 (2007). 18/28 50.Engel, J. Nuclear Schiff Moments and CP Violation.Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.75(2025). 51.De Vries, J.et al.Parity-and t...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.035503 2007

  48. [48]

    & Becker, P

    Dobaczewski, J., Engel, J., Kortelainen, M. & Becker, P. Correlating Schiff Moments in the Light Actinides with Octupole Moments.Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 232501, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121. 232501 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121 2018

  49. [49]

    & Meng, J

    Zhou, E., Yao, J., Engel, J. & Meng, J. Effects of beyond-mean-field correlations on nuclear Schiff moments.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.01369(2025). 54.Engel, J., Friar, J. L. & Hayes, A. C. Nuclear octupole correlations and the enhancement of atomic time-reversal violation.Phys. Rev. C61, 035502, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.61.035502 (2000)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.61.035502 2025

  50. [50]

    & Engel, J

    Dobaczewski, J. & Engel, J. Nuclear Time-Reversal Violation and the Schiff Moment of 225Ra. Phys. review letters94, 232502 (2005)

    2005

  51. [51]

    Butler, P. A. & Nazarewicz, W. Intrinsic reflection asymmetry in atomic nuclei.Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 349–421, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.68.349

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.68.349

  52. [52]

    Butler, P. A. Pear-shaped atomic nuclei.Proc. Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.476, 20200202, DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2020.0202

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2020.0202 2020

  53. [53]

    & Viviani, M

    Gnech, A., De Vries, J., Shain, S. & Viviani, M. Electric dipole moment of light nuclei in chiral effective field theory.EPJ Web Conf.258, 06007, DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/202225806007

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/202225806007

  54. [54]

    A Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory.Front

    Hergert, H. A Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory.Front. Phys.8, DOI: 10.3389/ fphy.2020.00379

    work page arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Butler, P. A. Octupole collectivity in nuclei.J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.43, 073002, DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/43/7/073002

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/43/7/073002

  56. [56]

    & Feldmeier, H

    Flambaum, V . & Feldmeier, H. Enhanced nuclear schiff moment in stable and metastable nuclei. Phys. Rev. C101, 015502 (2020)

    2020

  57. [57]

    A.et al.The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nuclei.Nat

    Butler, P. A.et al.The observation of vibrating pear-shapes in radon nuclei.Nat. Commun.10, 2473, DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-10494-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10494-5

  58. [59]

    Sushkov, O. P. Schiff moments of deformed nuclei.Phys. Rev. C110, 015501, DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevC.110.015501

  59. [60]

    J., Ichikawa, T

    Moller, P., Sierk, A. J., Ichikawa, T. & Sagawa, H. Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM(2012).At. Data Nucl. Data Tables109, DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002 (2016). 19/28

    work page doi:10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002 2012

  60. [61]

    & Nazarewicz, W

    Chen, M., Li, T., Dobaczewski, J. & Nazarewicz, W. Microscopic origin of reflection-asymmetric nuclear shapes.Phys. Rev. C103, 034303, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.103.034303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.034303

  61. [62]

    E., Afanasjev, A

    Cao, Y ., Agbemava, S. E., Afanasjev, A. V ., Nazarewicz, W. & Olsen, E. Landscape of pear-shaped even-even nuclei.Phys. Rev. C102, 024311, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.102.024311

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.024311

  62. [63]

    & Plehn, T

    Degenkolb, S., Elmer, N., Modak, T., Mühlleitner, M. & Plehn, T. A global view of the EDM landscape.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.02052(2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  63. [64]

    & Berger, R

    Gaul, K. & Berger, R. Global analysis of CP-violation in atoms, molecules and role of medium-heavy systems.J. High Energy Phys.2024, 1–42 (2024)

    2024

  64. [65]

    Ramsey-Musolf, M. J. & Vasquez, J. C. Left-right symmetry and electric dipole moments. A global analysis.Phys. Lett. B815, 136136, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136136 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136136 2021

  65. [66]

    M., Skodras, D

    Brod, J., Cornell, J. M., Skodras, D. & Stamou, E. Global constraints on Yukawa operators in the standard model effective theory.J. High Energy Phys.2022, 294, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2022)294 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2022)294 2022

  66. [67]

    Aebischer, J., Buras, A. J. & Kumar, J. SMEFT ATLAS: The Landscape Beyond the Standard Model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.05926(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [68]

    Dekens, W.et al.Unraveling models of CP violation through electric dipole moments of light nuclei. J. High Energy Phys.2014, 1–57, DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2014)069

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2014)069 2014

  68. [69]

    & Navrátil, P

    Froese, P. & Navrátil, P. Ab initio calculations of electric dipole moments of light nuclei.Phys. Rev. C104, 025502, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.025502 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.025502 2021

  69. [70]

    Chen, T.et al.Relativistic exact two-component coupled-cluster study of molecular sensitivity factors for nuclear schiff moments.The J. Phys. Chem. A128, 6540–6554 (2024)

    2024

  70. [71]

    Supersymmetry searches at ATLAS and CMS.arxivDOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.06839

    Kwon, H. Supersymmetry searches at ATLAS and CMS.arxivDOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.06839. Version: 1, 2506.06839[hep-ex]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06839

  71. [72]

    The quest to discover supersymmetry at the ATLAS experiment.Phys

    The ATLAS Collaboration. The quest to discover supersymmetry at the ATLAS experiment.Phys. Reports1116, 261–300, DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.09.010 2024

  72. [73]

    Supersymmetry searches in CMS run 2: A complete review.Highlights High-Energy Phys.1, 18, DOI: 10.53941/hihep.2025.100018

    Sekmen, S. Supersymmetry searches in CMS run 2: A complete review.Highlights High-Energy Phys.1, 18, DOI: 10.53941/hihep.2025.100018. 79.Jayich, A. EDM-Limits.GitHub(2025). GitHub repository

    work page doi:10.53941/hihep.2025.100018 2025

  73. [74]

    & Heckel, B

    Graner, B., Chen, Y ., Lindahl, E. & Heckel, B. Reduced limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of 199Hg.Phys. review letters116, 161601 (2016)

    2016

  74. [75]

    S.et al.A conveyor-belt magneto-optical trap of caf.Nat

    Yu, S. S.et al.A conveyor-belt magneto-optical trap of caf.Nat. Commun.17, DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-025-67944-6 (2026). 20/28

    2026

  75. [76]

    Khasanov, S., Su, Y ., Safarov, A., Tedila, H. M. & Mamatkulov, O. Major radioactive ion beam facilities: a brief global overview.The Eur. Phys. J. Plus140, 638, DOI: 10.1140/epjp/ s13360-025-06586-5 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/ 2025

  76. [78]

    D.et al.US Heavy Actinide Production at Oak Ridge National Laboratory – Ongoing Actinide Partitioning and Transmutation Programs

    Collins, E. D.et al.US Heavy Actinide Production at Oak Ridge National Laboratory – Ongoing Actinide Partitioning and Transmutation Programs. In16th Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation (IEMPT 16), 1–6 (OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2020)

    2020

  77. [79]

    & Ruiz, R

    Yang, X., Wang, S., Wilkins, S. & Ruiz, R. G. Laser spectroscopy for the study of exotic nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.129, 104005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.104005 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.104005 2022

  78. [80]

    M.et al.Precision spectroscopy and laser-cooling scheme of a radium-containing molecule.Nat

    Udrescu, S. M.et al.Precision spectroscopy and laser-cooling scheme of a radium-containing molecule.Nat. Phys.20, 202–207, DOI: 10.1038/s41567-023-02296-w (2024)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-023-02296-w 2024

  79. [81]

    Wilkins, S

    S.G. Wilkins, S. U.et al.Observation of the distribution of nuclear magnetization in a molecule. Science390, 386, DOI: 10.1126/science.adm7717 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adm7717 2025

  80. [82]

    Athanasakis-Kaklamanakiset al.Laser spectroscopy and CP-violation sensitivity of actinium monofluoride.arXiv(2025)

    M. Athanasakis-Kaklamanakiset al.Laser spectroscopy and CP-violation sensitivity of actinium monofluoride.arXiv(2025). 2507.05224

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.