arxiv: 2605.13036 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO· hep-ph· hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Inspiral gravitational waveforms from charged compact binaries with scalar hair

Antonio De Felice, Shinji Tsujikawa

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 19:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-phhep-th

keywords gravitational waveformscharged compact binariesscalar hairEinstein-scalar-Maxwell theorypost-Newtonian correctionsdipole radiationbinary pulsars

0 comments

The pith

In Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theories, gravitational waveforms from charged compact binaries deviate from general relativity through a single parameter b that introduces a leading -1 post-Newtonian dipole correction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives inspiral waveforms for compact binaries in Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theories where a scalar field couples to a U(1) gauge field. Compact objects carry vector charges and induced scalar hair, modeled as point particles with scalar-dependent masses. Differences in charge-to-mass ratios between the bodies source dipole radiation that produces a -1 post-Newtonian correction to the tensor waveform while also adding scalar and vector energy-loss channels. All amplitude and phase modifications are controlled by one parameter b. The framework yields concrete predictions for binary-pulsar orbital decay that already constrain b for neutron-star systems and supplies explicit waveform templates for black-hole, neutron-star, and exotic-compact-object binaries.

Core claim

In the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell framework, the conservative dynamics and far-zone radiative fields of charged compact binaries are computed from the tensor, scalar, and vector modes. Dipole radiation arising from mismatched scalar and vector charge-to-mass ratios supplies the leading -1 post-Newtonian correction, with the entire departure from general relativity encoded in a single parameter b that governs both amplitude and phase evolution of the frequency-domain waveform constructed via the stationary-phase approximation.

What carries the argument

The parameter b that quantifies differences in scalar and vector charge-to-mass ratios and thereby controls all amplitude and phase modifications to the waveform.

If this is right

Binary-pulsar timing already imposes stringent upper limits on b for neutron-star binaries.
Explicit numerical values of b can be computed for representative BH-BH, NS-NS, and ECO-ECO systems realized in the theory.
The frequency-domain waveform includes additional energy flux from scalar and vector radiation on top of the tensor mode.
The same parameter b simultaneously rescales the amplitude and advances or retards the phase of the observed signal.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Future ground-based detectors with higher sensitivity could place tighter bounds on b by resolving the -1PN term in the early inspiral.
The assumption that scalar hair is strictly secondary to vector charge restricts the possible range of deviations compared with theories that allow primary scalar charges.
Similar dipole-radiation signatures appear in other scalar-tensor or vector-tensor extensions, suggesting a common observational search strategy across modified-gravity models.

Load-bearing premise

Compact objects are modeled as electrically charged point particles whose masses depend on the scalar field, with scalar hair treated as secondary and induced solely by the vector charge.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of orbital-period decay in a binary pulsar that matches the general-relativity prediction without any excess -1 post-Newtonian energy loss would rule out non-zero values of b for that class of systems.

read the original abstract

We investigate gravitational waveforms from compact binary systems in Einstein-scalar-Maxwell (ESM) theories, where a scalar field $\phi$ couples to a $U(1)$ gauge field $A_\mu$ through a field-dependent function $\mu(\phi)$. In this framework, compact objects -- black holes (BHs), neutron stars (NSs), and exotic compact objects (ECOs) -- can carry both vector and scalar charges, with the latter arising as secondary hair induced by the former. Modeling the binary as electrically charged point particles with scalar-field-dependent masses, we derive the conservative dynamics in the near zone and compute the radiative fields in the far zone. The tensor waveform is modified through the effective dynamics and radiation-reaction-driven phase evolution, while scalar and vector modes introduce additional energy-loss channels. From the energy fluxes of tensor, scalar, and vector radiation, we construct the frequency-domain waveform using the stationary phase approximation. Dipole radiation sourced by differences in scalar and vector charge-to-mass ratios yields a leading $-1$ post-Newtonian correction. The deviation from general relativity is characterized by a single parameter $b$, which controls both amplitude and phase modifications. We further examine constraints from the orbital-period decay of binary pulsars, showing that current observations already place stringent bounds on $b$ for neutron star binaries. In addition, we evaluate $b$ for representative BH-BH, NS-NS, ECO-ECO binaries realized in ESM theories. Our results provide a unified framework for gravitational-wave signatures of charged compact binaries and offer a means of testing dark-sectorscalar and vector charges with current and future observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a concrete single-parameter b waveform template for charged binaries with induced scalar hair in ESM theory, including the -1PN dipole, but the point-particle induction assumption may not hold for objects with independent scalar profiles.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that the authors construct frequency-domain gravitational waveforms for compact binaries in Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theories. They model the objects as charged point particles whose masses depend on the scalar field, treat the scalar charge as secondary hair induced by the vector charge, and reduce all deviations from GR to one parameter b that enters both amplitude and phase via the leading -1PN dipole radiation from charge-to-mass differences. They derive the near-zone dynamics, compute tensor/scalar/vector energy fluxes, and apply the stationary-phase approximation to get the waveform, then bound b with binary pulsar data and evaluate it for example BH, NS, and ECO systems. This combination of the specific theory setup with an explicit single-b template is not in the standard literature they cite. The derivation path is laid out clearly and the pulsar constraints provide a quick external check. The work supplies a practical template that could be used for testing dark-sector charges with existing data. The soft spot is the modeling assumption itself. By taking scalar hair as purely induced and secondary in a point-particle limit, the differences in scalar and vector charges collapse to b alone. For neutron stars or exotic compact objects, finite-size effects or independent scalar profiles could introduce extra parameters, which would make the single-b form incomplete. The abstract does not show explicit validation against GR limits or error budgets, so the accuracy of the approximation is hard to judge without the full equations. This paper is for people building modified-gravity waveform models or looking for new ways to test scalar-vector couplings with gravitational waves and pulsars. A reader already working on scalar-tensor or Einstein-Maxwell extensions would get direct value from the template expressions. It deserves a serious referee because the construction is explicit and the bounds are straightforward to verify, even though the induction assumption needs checking in review. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives inspiral gravitational waveforms for charged compact binaries in Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theories. Compact objects (BHs, NSs, ECOs) are modeled as electrically charged point particles whose masses depend on a scalar field φ coupled to a U(1) gauge field via μ(φ); scalar charges arise as secondary hair induced by vector charges. Conservative near-zone dynamics and far-zone tensor/scalar/vector radiative fields are computed, with the frequency-domain waveform obtained via the stationary-phase approximation. Dipole radiation from differences in scalar and vector charge-to-mass ratios produces a leading -1PN correction, and all deviations from GR are claimed to be controlled by a single parameter b that modifies both amplitude and phase. Constraints on b are extracted from binary-pulsar orbital decay, and b is evaluated for representative BH-BH, NS-NS, and ECO-ECO systems.

Significance. If the single-parameter reduction holds, the work supplies a concrete, observationally constrained template for testing dark-sector scalar and vector charges with current and future gravitational-wave detectors. The explicit inclusion of multiple radiation channels and the direct link to existing pulsar bounds make the result immediately usable for data-analysis pipelines. The unified treatment across BH, NS, and ECO binaries is a practical strength.

major comments (3)

[§2] §2 (point-particle modeling): The central claim that a single parameter b fully characterizes deviations rests on the assertion that scalar charges are strictly secondary and induced solely by the vector charge through μ(φ). The manuscript must show explicitly, via the coupled field equations for the point-particle ansatz, that no independent scalar charge parameter survives; otherwise the waveform template requires at least two deviation parameters and the -1PN dipole term is no longer universal.
[§4] §4 (stationary-phase waveform): The frequency-domain construction incorporates the modified energy fluxes and the -1PN dipole phase term, but the validity range and truncation error of the stationary-phase approximation under the altered radiation-reaction force are not quantified. A direct comparison of the resulting phase evolution to the known -1PN limit in Einstein-Maxwell or scalar-tensor theories (e.g., via the Peters-Mathews formula) is needed to confirm consistency.
[§5] §5 (pulsar constraints): The bounds on b derived from binary-pulsar orbital-period decay assume the point-particle limit without finite-size or tidal corrections. For NS binaries this assumption must be justified or supplemented by an estimate of the systematic uncertainty introduced by the stellar structure; otherwise the quoted limits on b cannot be regarded as robust.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract introduces b without giving its explicit definition in terms of the charge-to-mass ratios; a one-line expression or reference to the relevant equation would improve readability.
[§3] Notation for the scalar and vector charges (e.g., Q_s, Q_v) should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional switches between “charge-to-mass ratio” and “b” obscure the mapping.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will implement.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§2] §2 (point-particle modeling): The central claim that a single parameter b fully characterizes deviations rests on the assertion that scalar charges are strictly secondary and induced solely by the vector charge through μ(φ). The manuscript must show explicitly, via the coupled field equations for the point-particle ansatz, that no independent scalar charge parameter survives; otherwise the waveform template requires at least two deviation parameters and the -1PN dipole term is no longer universal.

Authors: We agree that an explicit derivation from the field equations is necessary to confirm the reduction to a single parameter. In the revised manuscript, we will expand §2 to include the solution of the coupled field equations for the point-particle ansatz, demonstrating that the scalar charge is induced solely by the vector charge through μ(φ) with no independent scalar charge parameter remaining. This will establish that deviations are controlled exclusively by the single parameter b. revision: yes
Referee: [§4] §4 (stationary-phase waveform): The frequency-domain construction incorporates the modified energy fluxes and the -1PN dipole phase term, but the validity range and truncation error of the stationary-phase approximation under the altered radiation-reaction force are not quantified. A direct comparison of the resulting phase evolution to the known -1PN limit in Einstein-Maxwell or scalar-tensor theories (e.g., via the Peters-Mathews formula) is needed to confirm consistency.

Authors: We acknowledge the need to quantify the validity of the stationary-phase approximation (SPA) under the modified dynamics. In the revised §4, we will add a discussion of the validity range and truncation errors of the SPA in the presence of the altered radiation-reaction force. We will also include a direct comparison of the phase evolution to the Peters-Mathews formula in the appropriate limits of Einstein-Maxwell and scalar-tensor theories to confirm consistency. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (pulsar constraints): The bounds on b derived from binary-pulsar orbital-period decay assume the point-particle limit without finite-size or tidal corrections. For NS binaries this assumption must be justified or supplemented by an estimate of the systematic uncertainty introduced by the stellar structure; otherwise the quoted limits on b cannot be regarded as robust.

Authors: We agree that the point-particle assumption for neutron-star binaries requires justification. In the revised §5, we will add a discussion explaining that finite-size and tidal corrections enter at higher post-Newtonian orders and do not affect the leading -1PN dipole contribution to the orbital decay. We will also provide an estimate of the systematic uncertainty for NS binaries to support the robustness of the bounds on b. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; single-b parameterization follows directly from explicit model assumptions

full rationale

The paper specifies the ESM framework and adopts the point-particle model with scalar-field-dependent masses where scalar charges arise solely as secondary hair induced by vector charges. From this, the conservative dynamics, energy fluxes (tensor/scalar/vector), and stationary-phase waveform are derived, with the deviation from GR parameterized by a single b that encodes charge-to-mass ratio differences and produces the -1PN dipole term. This is a direct consequence of the stated modeling choice rather than a fit, self-definition, or self-citation reduction; b is introduced as a free parameter of the theory and later bounded by external pulsar data. No equation or step equates the final waveform to an input by construction, and the derivation remains self-contained within the given assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Einstein-scalar-Maxwell action with coupling function mu(phi), the point-particle approximation for compact objects, and the assumption that scalar hair is purely secondary.

free parameters (1)

b
Single parameter that encodes all amplitude and phase deviations from general relativity; its value is constrained by observations rather than derived from first principles.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Einstein-scalar-Maxwell theory with scalar-dependent coupling mu(phi) to the U(1) gauge field
The entire framework is built inside this specific modified-gravity theory; no derivation of the action is provided.
domain assumption Compact objects can be treated as point particles carrying both vector and scalar charges with masses depending on the scalar field
Invoked when modeling the binary dynamics and radiation.

invented entities (1)

secondary scalar hair induced by vector charge no independent evidence
purpose: Allows compact objects to carry scalar charges without independent scalar hair
Postulated within the ESM theory to generate the dipole radiation channel; no independent evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5599 in / 1507 out tokens · 43335 ms · 2026-05-14T19:09:47.782024+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

116 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 55 internal anchors

[1]

in strong-gravity environments, in analogy with the standard spontaneous scalarization mechanism induced by a nonminimal scalar coupling to the Ricci scalar [42]. As an illustrative example, consider the coupling µ(ϕ) =e−βϕ2/M2 Pl,(6.30) 27 which admits two distinct branches of solutions: (i) the GR branch, characterized by ϕ(r) = 0 everywhere, and (ii) t...
[2]

III, where the time-domain solutions were derived for a circular orbit with constant angular frequency ω, we take the relative separation r in the x-y plane as given by Eq

Scalar waves Following Sec. III, where the time-domain solutions were derived for a circular orbit with constant angular frequency ω, we take the relative separation r in the x-y plane as given by Eq. (3.10). We also choose the line-of-sight unit vector ˆn as defined in Eq. (3.14). The leading time-domain solution for the scalar field φin the far zone is ...
[3]

The corresponding dipole moment is given by Eq

Vector waves We next discuss the radiation emitted by the vector fieldAµ. The corresponding dipole moment is given by Eq. (4.29). Taking its time derivative for the circular binary separationrin Eq. (3.10), we obtain ˙De = √ 4πµ∞GNmr ∆σrω(−sin Φ,cos Φ,0).(14) Substituting this expression into Eqs. (4.35) and (4.38), the radiative vector potential is given...
[4]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo),Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 061102 (2016), arXiv:1602.03837 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[5]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo),Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[6]

An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A

A. Goldsteinet al.,Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L14 (2017), arXiv:1710.05446 [astro-ph.HE]. 32

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[7]

B. P. Abbottet al.,Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L12 (2017), arXiv:1710.05833 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[8]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo, Fermi-GBM, INTEGRAL),Astrophys. J. Lett.848, L13 (2017), arXiv:1710.05834 [astro-ph.HE]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[9]

B. P. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo),Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[10]

Dark Energy after GW170817 and GRB170817A

P. Creminelli and F. Vernizzi,Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1710.05877 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[11]

J. M. Ezquiaga and M. Zumalacarregui,Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251304 (2017), arXiv:1710.05901 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[12]

Implications of the Neutron Star Merger GW170817 for Cosmological Scalar-Tensor Theories

J. Sakstein and B. Jain,Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251303 (2017), arXiv:1710.05893 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[13]

Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A

T. Baker, E. Bellini, P. G. Ferreira, M. Lagos, J. Noller, and I. Sawicki,Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 251301 (2017), arXiv:1710.06394 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[14]

Dark energy in Horndeski theories after GW170817: A review

R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D28, 1942005 (2019), arXiv:1809.08735 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[15]

Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo),Astrophys

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo),Astrophys. J. Lett.915, L5 (2021), arXiv:2106.15163 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2021
[16]

Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo),Phys

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo),Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 101102 (2020), arXiv:2009.01075 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[17]

Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo),Astrophys

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific and Virgo),Astrophys. J. Lett.896, L44 (2020), arXiv:2006.12611 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo and KAGRA),Astrophys

R. Abbottet al.(LIGO Scientific, Virgo and KAGRA),Astrophys. J. Lett.969, L34 (2024), arXiv:2404.04248 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2024
[19]

A no-hair theorem for the galileon

L. Hui and A. Nicolis,Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 241104 (2013), arXiv:1202.1296 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[20]

Minamitsuji, K

M. Minamitsuji, K. Takahashi, and S. Tsujikawa,Phys. Rev. D105, 104001 (2022), arXiv:2201.09687 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

Minamitsuji, K

M. Minamitsuji, K. Takahashi, and S. Tsujikawa,Phys. Rev. D106, 044003 (2022), arXiv:2204.13837 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

G. W. Horndeski,Int. J. Theor. Phys.10, 363 (1974)

1974
[23]

S. W. Hawking,Commun. Math. Phys.25, 152 (1972)

1972
[24]

J. D. Bekenstein,Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 452 (1972)

1972
[25]

A. A. H. Graham and R. Jha,Phys. Rev. D89, 084056 (2014), arXiv:1401.8203 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[26]

S. W. Hawking,Commun. Math. Phys.25, 167 (1972)

1972
[27]

J. D. Bekenstein,Phys. Rev. D51, R6608 (1995), arXiv:gr-qc/9605059

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995
[28]

T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni,Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 081103 (2012), arXiv:1109.6324 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[29]

Jordan frame no-hair for spherical scalar-tensor black holes

V. Faraoni,Phys. Rev. D95, 124013 (2017), arXiv:1705.07134 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[30]

Kanti, N

P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, and E. Winstanley,Phys. Rev. D54, 5049 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9511071

work page arXiv 1996
[31]

Dilatonic Black Holes with Gauss-Bonnet Term

T. Torii, H. Yajima, and K.-i. Maeda,Phys. Rev. D55, 739 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9606034

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[32]

Dilatonic Black Holes in Higher-Curvature String Gravity II: Linear Stability

P. Kanti, N. E. Mavromatos, J. Rizos, K. Tamvakis, and E. Winstanley,Phys. Rev. D57, 6255 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9703192

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[33]

Are black holes in alternative theories serious astrophysical candidates? The case for Einstein-Dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet black holes

P. Pani and V. Cardoso,Phys. Rev. D79, 084031 (2009), arXiv:0902.1569 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[34]

T. P. Sotiriou and S.-Y. Zhou,Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 251102 (2014), arXiv:1312.3622 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[35]

D. D. Doneva and S. S. Yazadjiev,Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131103 (2018), arXiv:1711.01187 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[36]

H. O. Silva, J. Sakstein, L. Gualtieri, T. P. Sotiriou, and E. Berti,Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131104 (2018), arXiv:1711.02080 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[37]

Evasion of No-Hair Theorems and Novel Black-Hole Solutions in Gauss-Bonnet Theories

G. Antoniou, A. Bakopoulos, and P. Kanti,Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 131102 (2018), arXiv:1711.03390 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[38]

Generalized G-inflation: Inflation with the most general second-order field equations

T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi, and J. Yokoyama,Prog. Theor. Phys.126, 511 (2011), arXiv:1105.5723 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[39]

Black hole perturbation in the most general scalar-tensor theory with second-order field equations I: The odd-parity sector

T. Kobayashi, H. Motohashi, and T. Suyama,Phys. Rev. D85, 084025 (2012), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 96, 109903 (2017)], arXiv:1202.4893 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[40]

Black hole perturbation in the most general scalar-tensor theory with second-order field equations II: the even-parity sector

T. Kobayashi, H. Motohashi, and T. Suyama,Phys. Rev. D89, 084042 (2014), arXiv:1402.6740 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[41]

Kase and S

R. Kase and S. Tsujikawa,Phys. Rev. D105, 024059 (2022), arXiv:2110.12728 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[42]

Cosmological instability of scalar-Gauss-Bonnet theories exhibiting scalarization

T. Anson, E. Babichev, C. Charmousis, and S. Ramazanov,JCAP06, 023 (2019), arXiv:1903.02399 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[43]

Franchini and T

N. Franchini and T. P. Sotiriou,Phys. Rev. D101, 064068 (2020), arXiv:1903.05427 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[44]

Brans and R

C. Brans and R. H. Dicke,Phys. Rev.124, 925 (1961)

1961
[45]

Damour and G

T. Damour and G. Esposito-Farese,Phys. Rev. Lett.70, 2220 (1993)

1993
[46]

D. M. Eardley,Astrophys. J. Lett.196, L59 (1975)

1975
[47]

C. M. Will,Phys. Rev. D50, 6058 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9406022

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[48]

Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework

N. Yunes and F. Pretorius,Phys. Rev. D80, 122003 (2009), arXiv:0909.3328 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[49]

Post-Circular Expansion of Eccentric Binary Inspirals: Fourier-Domain Waveforms in the Stationary Phase Approximation

N. Yunes, K. G. Arun, E. Berti, and C. M. Will,Phys. Rev. D80, 084001 (2009), arXiv:0906.0313 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[50]

Gravitational radiation from compact binary systems in the massive Brans-Dicke theory of gravity

J. Alsing, E. Berti, C. M. Will, and H. Zaglauer,Phys. Rev. D85, 064041 (2012), arXiv:1112.4903 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[51]

K. Yagi, L. C. Stein, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka,Phys. Rev. D85, 064022 (2012), [Erratum: Phys. Rev. D 93, 089909 (2016)], arXiv:1110.5950 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[52]

Light scalar field constraints from gravitational-wave observations of compact binaries

E. Berti, L. Gualtieri, M. Horbatsch, and J. Alsing,Phys. Rev. D85, 122005 (2012), arXiv:1204.4340 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[53]

K. Yagi, N. Yunes, and T. Tanaka,Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 251105 (2012), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 116, 169902 (2016), Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 124, 029901 (2020)], arXiv:1208.5102 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2012
[54]

R. N. Lang,Phys. Rev. D89, 084014 (2014), arXiv:1310.3320 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[55]

Compact binary systems in scalar-tensor gravity: Equations of motion to 2.5 post-Newtonian order

S. Mirshekari and C. M. Will,Phys. Rev. D87, 084070 (2013), arXiv:1301.4680 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[56]

R. N. Lang,Phys. Rev. D91, 084027 (2015), arXiv:1411.3073 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[57]

Black Hole Based Tests of General Relativity

K. Yagi and L. C. Stein,Class. Quant. Grav.33, 054001 (2016), arXiv:1602.02413 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[58]

Gravitational waveforms in scalar-tensor gravity at 2PN relative order

N. Sennett, S. Marsat, and A. Buonanno,Phys. Rev. D94, 084003 (2016), arXiv:1607.01420 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[59]

Neutron star mergers as a probe of modifications of general relativity with finite-range scalar forces

L. Sagunski, J. Zhang, M. C. Johnson, L. Lehner, M. Sakellariadou, S. L. Liebling, C. Palenzuela, and D. Neilsen,Phys. Rev. D97, 064016 (2018), arXiv:1709.06634 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[60]

Bernard,Phys

L. Bernard,Phys. Rev. D98, 044004 (2018), arXiv:1802.10201 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[62]

T. Liu, W. Zhao, and Y. Wang,Phys. Rev. D102, 124035 (2020), arXiv:2007.10068 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[63]

Bernard, L

L. Bernard, L. Blanchet, and D. Trestini,JCAP08, 008 (2022), arXiv:2201.10924 [gr-qc]. 33

work page arXiv 2022
[65]

Quartin, S

M. Quartin, S. Tsujikawa, L. Amendola, and R. Sturani,JCAP08, 049 (2023), arXiv:2304.02535 [astro-ph.CO]

work page arXiv 2023
[66]

R. Niu, X. Zhang, B. Wang, and W. Zhao,Astrophys. J.921, 149 (2021), arXiv:2105.13644 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[67]

Takeda, S

H. Takeda, S. Tsujikawa, and A. Nishizawa,Phys. Rev. D109, 104072 (2024), arXiv:2311.09281 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

Reissner,Annalen der Physik355, 106 (1916)

H. Reissner,Annalen der Physik355, 106 (1916)

1916
[69]

J. M. Bardeen, inBlack Holes (Les Houches Lectures), edited by C. DeWitt and B. DeWitt (Gordon and Breach, 1973) p. 215

1973
[70]

D. L. Lee,Phys. Rev. D10, 2374 (1974)

1974
[72]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

N. Aghanimet al.,Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020
[73]

M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino,Nucl. Phys. B193, 221 (1981)

1981
[74]

M. J. Duff, J. T. Liu, and J. Rahmfeld,Nucl. Phys. B459, 125 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9508094

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[75]

N=2 Supergravity and N=2 Super Yang-Mills Theory on General Scalar Manifolds: Symplectic Covariance, Gaugings and the Momentum Map

L. Andrianopoli, M. Bertolini, A. Ceresole, R. D’Auria, S. Ferrara, P. Fre, and T. Magri,J. Geom. Phys.23, 111 (1997), arXiv:hep-th/9605032

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[76]

Kaluza,Sitzungsber

T. Kaluza,Sitzungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Berlin (Math. Phys.)1921, 966 (1921)

1921
[77]

O. Klein,Z. Phys.37, 895 (1926)

1926
[78]

G. W. Gibbons and K.-i. Maeda,Nucl. Phys. B298, 741 (1988)

1988
[79]

Garfinkle, G

D. Garfinkle, G. T. Horowitz, and A. Strominger,Phys. Rev. D43, 3140 (1991), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 45, 3888 (1992)]

1991
[80]

C. A. R. Herdeiro and E. Radu,Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 011101 (2019), arXiv:1904.09901 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[81]

P. G. S. Fernandes,Phys. Rev. D100, 024045 (2019), arXiv:1902.05079 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[82]

Ikeda, T

T. Ikeda, T. Nakamura, and M. Minamitsuji,Phys. Rev. D100, 104014 (2019), arXiv:1908.09394 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[83]

Minamitsuji and S

M. Minamitsuji and S. Tsujikawa,Phys. Lett. B820, 136509 (2021), arXiv:2105.14661 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.