pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13528 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

High-temperature behavior of amorphous alumina coatings: Insights from in-situ nanoindentation and X-ray diffraction studies

A. Zaborowska , L. Kurpaska , M. Zielinski , Q. Xu , E. Wyszkowska , J. OConnell , J.H. Neethling , F. Di Fonzo
show 4 more authors
M. Frelek-Kozak S. Papanikolaou R. Diduszko J. Jagielski
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-14 18:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords amorphous alumina coatingsnanoindentationhigh temperature behaviorX-ray diffractionphase transitionsnuclear materialsmechanical propertiesthermal stability
0
0 comments X

The pith

Amorphous alumina coatings show gradual hardness drop with constant Young's modulus up to 650°C

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the high-temperature mechanical properties and structural stability of amorphous alumina thin films intended for nuclear applications. Using in-situ nanoindentation, it finds that hardness decreases steadily as temperature rises from room temperature to 650°C, while the elastic modulus stays unchanged. This suggests the material becomes more plastic through accelerated bond switching without crystallizing. Separate in-situ X-ray diffraction tracks the coating's phase changes above 650°C, showing initial crystallization at 700°C, intermediate phases until 950°C, and only stable alpha-alumina beyond that. These observations help define the safe operating temperature range for such protective coatings in demanding environments.

Core claim

The hardness of the amorphous alumina coating decreases gradually and constantly with temperature up to 650°C while the Young's modulus stays constant throughout, consistent with increasing plasticity from an accelerating bond-switching mechanism; the coating remains non-crystalline in this range, and in-situ XRD shows thermally activated crystallization beginning at 700°C with intermediate alumina phases persisting until 950°C, after which only alpha-Al2O3 is observed.

What carries the argument

In-situ nanoindentation combined with in-situ X-ray diffraction, which maps the mechanical response and phase evolution in real time as temperature increases.

If this is right

  • Coatings can operate without loss of stiffness up to 650°C in high-temperature applications.
  • The increase in plasticity at higher temperatures may enhance resistance to brittle failure.
  • Phase transitions limit long-term stability above 950°C where only alpha phase forms.
  • The in-situ methods provide dynamic data on transitions that ex-situ testing would miss.
  • These results help estimate performance in nuclear plant operating conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar gradual softening might apply to other amorphous ceramic coatings under thermal load.
  • Extending the combined techniques to irradiated samples could reveal how radiation affects the bond-switching process.
  • The constant modulus suggests these coatings might resist thermal expansion mismatch stresses better than crystalline ones.
  • Further modeling of bond-switching rates could predict behavior at temperatures beyond the tested range.

Load-bearing premise

The gradual hardness decrease results specifically from an accelerating bond-switching mechanism and that the laboratory in-situ conditions accurately reflect real-world nuclear power plant environments.

What would settle it

Performing nanoindentation at 650°C on a pre-annealed sample without prior loading to check if hardness drops occur without mechanical deformation, or detecting alpha-Al2O3 formation below 950°C in vacuum or different atmospheres.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13528 by A. Zaborowska, E. Wyszkowska, F. Di Fonzo, J.H. Neethling, J. Jagielski, J. OConnell, L. Kurpaska, M. Frelek-Kozak, M. Zielinski, Q. Xu, R. Diduszko, S. Papanikolaou.

Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows the contact pressure vs. depth curves for the same sample size. All samples were [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Further development of nuclear power plant technology relies heavily on materials durability under operating conditions. Estimating the materials performance in the operando tests is crucial. In this paper, the mechanical behavior of thin amorphous nuclear-dedicated Al2O3 coatings deposited by pulsed laser deposition was investigated by nanoindentation over the temperature range of 25-650C. Experimental nanomechanical analysis was supported by MD simulations. The results indicate that the hardness of the amorphous coating experiences a gradual, constant decrease with temperature, while the Young modulus value remains constant in the whole temperature range. Observed phenomena confirm the increasing plasticity of the material and it is postulated to be related to the bond-switching mechanism that accelerates at high temperatures. The post-mortem transmission electron microscopy characterization confirmed that the loaded material was non-crystalline over the entire range of the indentation temperatures. The thermal stability of the structure was further studied in-situ up to 1050C by X-ray diffraction. The implemented methodology allowed us to follow the dynamic process of phase transitions occurring in the material above 650C. First, thermally activated crystallization was observed at 700C. Intermediate alumina phases were present up to 950C, while above this temperature, exclusively the thermodynamically stable alpha-Al2O3 was observed. The in-situ high-temperature characterization of the evolution of thin films boosts the understanding of the application limits of the coating systems at elevated temperatures. The added value is that the paper demonstrates the potential usefulness of combining high-temperature techniques to characterize the complete behavior of thin films at elevated temperatures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental results on the high-temperature mechanical properties of pulsed-laser-deposited amorphous Al2O3 coatings via in-situ nanoindentation (25–650 °C) supported by MD simulations, post-mortem TEM, and separate in-situ XRD (up to 1050 °C). It claims a gradual, constant decrease in hardness with temperature while Young’s modulus remains constant, attributes the trend to accelerating bond switching, confirms the indented material stays amorphous, and documents thermally activated crystallization beginning at 700 °C with intermediate phases persisting to 950 °C before exclusive formation of α-Al2O3.

Significance. If the reported trends hold, the work supplies direct, temperature-dependent nanomechanical data and phase-evolution observations relevant to protective coatings in nuclear environments. The combined use of in-situ nanoindentation, TEM, and XRD constitutes a practical methodology for characterizing thin-film stability at elevated temperatures, with the experimental measurements providing independent support for the hardness and modulus trends.

major comments (2)
  1. [Nanoindentation results] The central mechanical claim (gradual hardness decrease, constant modulus) rests on the nanoindentation data up to 650 °C, yet the manuscript does not report the number of valid indents per temperature, load-displacement curve quality metrics, or thermal-drift corrections; these details are required to assess whether the reported linear trend is statistically robust.
  2. [Discussion] The bond-switching interpretation of the hardness trend is presented as a postulate without quantitative comparison to the MD trajectories (e.g., no reported bond-angle or coordination-number statistics versus temperature); because this mechanism is invoked to explain the observed plasticity increase, a direct link or alternative explanation should be supplied.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction / Experimental] The temperature range of the nanoindentation experiments (≤650 °C) versus the XRD range (up to 1050 °C) should be explicitly justified with reference to anticipated nuclear-plant service temperatures.
  2. [Methods] MD simulation parameters (interatomic potential, system size, equilibration protocol) are mentioned but not tabulated; adding a concise methods table would improve reproducibility.
  3. [XRD results] Figure captions for the XRD patterns should state the heating rate and dwell times to allow readers to assess kinetic effects on the observed phase sequence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments. We have addressed the two major points by adding the requested experimental details and by strengthening the mechanistic discussion with quantitative MD analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Nanoindentation results] The central mechanical claim (gradual hardness decrease, constant modulus) rests on the nanoindentation data up to 650 °C, yet the manuscript does not report the number of valid indents per temperature, load-displacement curve quality metrics, or thermal-drift corrections; these details are required to assess whether the reported linear trend is statistically robust.

    Authors: We agree that these details are necessary to demonstrate robustness. In the revised manuscript we have added a table listing the number of valid indents at each temperature (8–12 per temperature), included representative load–displacement curves in the Supplementary Information, and expanded the Methods section with a full description of the thermal-drift correction protocol. These additions confirm that the observed linear hardness decrease is statistically supported by the data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] The bond-switching interpretation of the hardness trend is presented as a postulate without quantitative comparison to the MD trajectories (e.g., no reported bond-angle or coordination-number statistics versus temperature); because this mechanism is invoked to explain the observed plasticity increase, a direct link or alternative explanation should be supplied.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript presented the bond-switching mechanism as a postulate. We have re-examined the MD trajectories and added quantitative statistics on the temperature dependence of Al–O coordination numbers and bond-angle distributions (new Figure and text in the revised Discussion). These metrics show a clear increase in bond-switching frequency with temperature, directly linking the simulations to the measured rise in plasticity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from independent experiments

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental observations from in-situ nanoindentation (hardness and modulus vs temperature), post-mortem TEM, and in-situ XRD for phase transitions up to 1050C. No derivation chain, equations, or fitted parameters are invoked that reduce to self-definition or prior self-citations. MD simulations are cited only as supporting context without load-bearing predictions that loop back to inputs. Central claims rest on raw data and standard characterization techniques, making the work self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard interpretation of nanoindentation curves and XRD patterns rather than new postulates; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard nanoindentation analysis assumptions for extracting hardness and reduced modulus from load-displacement data remain valid at elevated temperatures up to 650C.
    Invoked to convert raw indentation data into reported hardness and modulus values.
  • domain assumption The tested thin-film samples are representative of nuclear-dedicated alumina coatings under operando conditions.
    Basis for relevance of the temperature limits to power-plant applications.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5646 in / 1362 out tokens · 56860 ms · 2026-05-14T18:18:37.142388+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Introduction Developing materials for extreme applications is very challenging as it requires consideration of many factors and complex relations that can affect the system's performance. This is best exemplified by nuclear materials that must retain their full functionality in the most demanding conditions, including high temperature (HT), high level s o...

  2. [2]

    This confirms that amorphous alumina oxide show significant potential to be used as a light, high-strength, and damage -tolerant engineering material which could be applied in Gen

    are correct, and brittleness of this material could be limited furthe r at high-temperature. This confirms that amorphous alumina oxide show significant potential to be used as a light, high-strength, and damage -tolerant engineering material which could be applied in Gen. IV applications. To gain a complete picture of material behavior at high temperatur...

  3. [3]

    It was reported that PLD -grown coatings generally reproduce the roughness of the substrate [41]

    Material and methods 2.1.Materials preparation 5 µm thick alumina coatings were deposited at RT on 0.9 mm thick AISI 316L stainless steel by PLD (Pulsed Laser Deposition). It was reported that PLD -grown coatings generally reproduce the roughness of the substrate [41]. Therefore, prior to the manufacturing process, steel samples were ground with SiC abras...

    2022

  4. [4]

    -“ ≡ the phase is not observed; “+

    Results 3.1.High-temperature nanoindentation - experiment High-temperature nanoindentation measurements were performed to study the evolution of the mechanical properties of the investigated material over LFR foreseen operating temperatures. The l oad-displacement behavior of a -Al2O3 coating within the testing temperature range is presented in Fig. 3. It...

  5. [5]

    The mechanical investigation showed that the hardness of the amorphous coating decreases with the temperature

    Discussion In summary, we have extensively explored the operational properties of the PLD-grown alumina coatings using in-situ high-temperature characterization techniques. The mechanical investigation showed that the hardness of the amorphous coating decreases with the temperature. The reported phenomenon is of vital importance, as from the mechanical po...

  6. [6]

    "Studies of the role of interfaces in multi -layered, coated and composite structures

    Summary This paper reports for the first time an in situ high-temperature study of thin amorphous alumina coatings grown by PLD for nuclear applications. Implementing HT GIXRD allowed us to monitor the temporal evolution of phase transitions in the material at temperatures exceeding 650 °C. It has been shown that a thermally activated amorphous-crystallin...

    2020

  7. [7]

    G.S. Was, D. Petti, S. Ukai, S. Zinkle, Materials for future nuclear energy systems, J. Nucl. Mater. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151837

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151837 2019

  8. [8]

    Zinkle, G.S

    S.J. Zinkle, G.S. Was, Materials challenges in nuclear energy, Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 735–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 2013

  9. [9]

    Zinkle, J.T

    S.J. Zinkle, J.T. Busby, Structural materials for fission & fusion energy, Mater. Today. 12 (2009) 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(09)70294-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s1369-7021(09)70294-9 2009

  10. [11]

    Hofmann, D.R

    F. Hofmann, D.R. Mason, J.K. Eliason, A.A. Maznev, K.A. Nelson, S.L. Dudarev, Non- 29 Contact Measurement of Thermal Diffusivity in Ion -Implanted Nuclear Materials, Sci. Rep. 5 (2015) 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep16042

    work page doi:10.1038/srep16042 2015

  11. [12]

    Gussev, T.S

    M.N. Gussev, T.S. Byun, Y. Yamamoto, S.A. Maloy, K.A. Terrani, In -situ tube burst testing and high -temperature deformation behavior of candidate materials for accident tolerant fuel cladding, J. Nucl. Mater. 466 (2015) 417 –425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.030 2015

  12. [13]

    Guimbretière, A

    G. Guimbretière, A. Canizarès, N. Raimboux, J. Joseph, P. Desgardin, L. Desgranges, C. Jegou, P. Simon, High temperature Raman study of UO2: A possible tool for in situ estimation of irradiation -induced heating, J. Raman Spectrosc. 46 (2015) 418 –420. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.4661

    work page doi:10.1002/jrs.4661 2015

  13. [14]

    Müller, G

    G. Müller, G. Schumacher, F. Zimmermann, Investigation on oxygen controlled liquid lead corrosion of surface treated steels, J. Nucl. Mater. 278 (2000) 85 –95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00211-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(99)00211-1 2000

  14. [15]

    Hosemann, Small -scale mechanical testing on nuclear materials: bridging the experimental length -scale gap, Scr

    P. Hosemann, Small -scale mechanical testing on nuclear materials: bridging the experimental length -scale gap, Scr. Mater. 143 (2018) 161 –168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.04.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.04.026 2018

  15. [16]

    Wheeler, D.E.J

    J.M. Wheeler, D.E.J. Armstrong, W. Heinz, R. Schwaiger, High temperature nanoindentation: The state of the art and future challenges, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 19 (2015) 354–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2015.02.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cossms.2015.02.002 2015

  16. [17]

    Pathak, S.R

    S. Pathak, S.R. Kalidindi, Spherical nanoindentation stress -strain curves, Mater. Sci. Eng. R Reports. 91 (2015) 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2015.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mser.2015.02.001 2015

  17. [18]

    Schmauder, C.S.D

    S. Schmauder, C.S.D. Chen, K.K. Chawla, N. Chawla, W. Chen, Y. Kagawa, Handbook of mechanics of materials, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6884-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-10-6884-3 2019

  18. [19]

    Beake, Elevated temperature nanomechanics of coatings for high -temperature applications: a review, Emergent Mater

    B.D. Beake, Elevated temperature nanomechanics of coatings for high -temperature applications: a review, Emergent Mater. 1 (2021) 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-021- 00255-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s42247-021- 2021

  19. [20]

    Frelek-Kozak, Kurpaska, K

    M. Frelek-Kozak, Kurpaska, K. Mulewska, M. Zieliński, R. Diduszko, A. Kosińska, D. Kalita, W. Chromiński, M. Turek, K. Kaszyca, A. Zaborowska, J. Jagielski, Mechanical behavior of ion -irradiated ODS RAF steels strengthened with different types of 30 refractory oxides, Appl. Surf. Sci. 610 (2023) 155465. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2022.155465

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155465 2023

  20. [21]

    Kurpaska, F.J

    L. Kurpaska, F.J. Dominguez-Gutierrez, Y. Zhang, K. Mulewska, H. Bei, W.J. Weber, A. Kosińska, W. Chr ominski, I. Jozwik, R. Alvarez -Donado, S. Papanikolaou, J. Jagielski, M. Alava, Effects of Fe atoms on hardening of a nickel matrix: Nanoindentation experiments and atom -scale numerical modeling, Mater. Des. 217 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MATDES....

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110639 2022

  21. [22]

    Alemberti, M

    A. Alemberti, M. Caramello, M. Frignani, G. Grasso, F. Merli, G. Morresi, M. Tarantino, ALFRED reactor coolant system design, Nucl. Eng. Des. 370 (2020) 110884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110884

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110884 2020

  22. [23]

    Lim, H.O

    J. Lim, H.O. Nam, I.S. Hwang, J.H. Kim, A study of early corrosion behaviors of FeCrAl alloys in liquid lead-bismuth eutectic environments, J. Nucl. Mater. 407 (2010) 205–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.018 2010

  23. [24]

    Ejenstam, P

    J. Ejenstam, P. Szakálos, Long term corrosion resistan ce of alumina forming austenitic stainless steels in liquid lead, J. Nucl. Mater. 461 (2015) 164 –170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.03.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.03.011 2015

  24. [25]

    Weisenburger, A

    A. Weisenburger, A. Heinzel, G. Müller, H. Muscher, A. Rousanov, T91 cladding tubes with and without m odified FeCrAlY coatings exposed in LBE at different flow, stress and temperature conditions, J. Nucl. Mater. 376 (2008) 274 –281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.02.026 2008

  25. [26]

    Proriol Serre, J.B

    I. Proriol Serre, J.B. Vogt, Mechanical behavior in liquid lead of Al2O3 coated 15-15Ti steel and an Alumina-Forming Austenitic steel designed to mitigate their corrosion, Eng. Fail. Anal. 139 (2022) 106443. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2022.106443

    work page doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106443 2022

  26. [27]

    Vogt, I.P

    J.B. Vogt, I.P. Serre, A review of the surface modifications for c orrosion mitigation of steels in lead and LBE, Coatings. 11 (2021) 1 –15. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11010053

    work page doi:10.3390/coatings11010053 2021

  27. [28]

    Ferré, A

    F.G. Ferré, A. Mairov, D. Iadicicco, M. Vanazzi, S. Bassini, M. Utili, M. Tarantino, M. Bragaglia, F.R. Lamastra, F. Nanni, L. Ceseracciu, Y. Serruys, P. Trocellier, L. Beck, K. Sridharan, M.G. Beghi, F. Di Fonzo, Corrosion and radiation resistant nanoceramic 31 coatings for lead fast reactors, Corros. Sci. 124 (2017) 80 –92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.corsci.2017.05.011 2017

  28. [29]

    Zaborowska, Ł

    A. Zaborowska, Ł. Kurpaska, E. Wyszkowska, M. Clozel, M. Vanazzi, F. Di Fonzo, M. Turek, I. Jóźwik, A. Kosińska, J. Jagielski, Influence of ion irradiation on the nanomechanical properties of thin alumina coatings deposited on 316L SS by PLD, Surf. Coatings Technol. 386 (2020) 125491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125491

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125491 2020

  29. [30]

    García Ferré, A

    F. García Ferré, A. Mairov, M. Vanazzi, Y. Serruys, F. Leprêtre, L. Beck, L. Van Brutzel, A. Chartier, M.G. Beghi, K. Sridharan, F. Di Fonzo, Extreme ion irradiation of oxide nanoceramics: Influence of the irradiation spectrum, Acta Mater. 143 (2018) 156 –165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.10.011 2018

  30. [31]

    Garciá Ferré, A

    F. Garciá Ferré, A. Mairov, L. Ceseracciu, Y. Serruys, P. Trocellier, C. Baumier, O. Kaïtasov, R. Brescia, D. Gastaldi, P. Vena, M.G. Beghi, L. Beck, K. Sridharan, F. Di Fonzo, Radiation endurance in Al2O3nanoceramics, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 1 –9. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33478

    work page doi:10.1038/srep33478 2016

  31. [32]

    Zaborowska, Ł

    A. Zaborowska, Ł. Kurpaska, M. Clozel, E.J. Olivier, J.H. O’Connell, M. Vanazzi, F. Di Fonzo, A. Azarov, I. Jóźwik, M. Frelek-Kozak, R. Diduszko, J.H. Neethling, J. Jagielski, Absolute radiation tolerance of amorphous alumina coatings at room temperature, Ceram. Int. 47 (2021) 34740–34750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.013 2021

  32. [33]

    Barnoush, P

    A. Barnoush, P. Hos emann, J. Molina -Aldareguia, J.M. Wheeler, In situ small -scale mechanical testing under extreme environments, MRS Bull. 44 (2019) 471 –477. https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2019.126

    work page doi:10.1557/mrs.2019.126 2019

  33. [34]

    Harris, B.D

    A.J. Harris, B.D. Beake, D.E.J. Armstrong, M.I. Davies, Development of Hig h Temperature Nanoindentation Methodology and its Application in the Nanoindentation of Polycrystalline Tungsten in Vacuum to 950 °C, Exp. Mech. 57 (2017) 1115 –1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-016-0209-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11340-016-0209-3 2017

  34. [35]

    Beake, A.J

    B. Beake, A.J. Harris, Extreme nanomechani cs to 1000 oC for high temperature mechanical properties of bulk materials and hard coatings, Vacuum. 159 (2018) 1 –27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.10.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2018.10.011 2018

  35. [36]

    Prasitthipayong, S.J

    A. Prasitthipayong, S.J. Vachhani, S.J. Tumey, A.M. Minor, P. Hosemann, Indentation size effect in unirradiated and ion-irradiated 800H steel at high temperatures, Acta Mater. 32 144 (2018) 896–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.001 2018

  36. [37]

    H. Vo, A. Reichardt, C. Howard, M.D. Abad, D. Kaoumi, P. Chou, P. Hosemann, Small- Scale Mechanical Testing on Proton Beam -Irradiated 304 SS from Room Temperature to Reactor Operation Temperature, JOM 2015 6712. 67 (2015) 2959 –2964. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11837-015-1596-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s11837-015-1596-0 2015

  37. [38]

    Huang, M.D

    Z. Huang, M.D. Abad, J.K. Ramsey, M.R. de Figueiredo, D. Kaoumi, N. Li, M. Asta, N. Gronbech-Jensen, P. Hosemann, A high temperature mechanical study on PH 13 -8 Mo maraging steel, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 651 (2016) 574 –582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.077

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2015.10.077 2016

  38. [39]

    Drnovšek, M

    A. Drnovšek, M. Rebelo de Figueiredo, H. Vo, A. Xia, S.J. Vachhani, S. Kolozsvári, P. Hosemann, R. Franz, Correlating high temperature mechanical and tribological properties of CrAlN and CrAlSiN hard coatings, Surf. Coatings Technol. 372 (2019) 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.044

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.05.044 2019

  39. [40]

    Al-haik, Mechanical properties of amorphous silicon carbonitride thin films at elevated temperatures, (2015) 1553–1564

    R.C.M.S. Al-haik, Mechanical properties of amorphous silicon carbonitride thin films at elevated temperatures, (2015) 1553–1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8715-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10853-014-8715-0 2015

  40. [41]

    Rebelo De Figueiredo, M.D

    M. Rebelo De Figueiredo, M.D. Abad, A.J. Harris, C. Czettl, C. Mitterer, P. Hosemann, Nanoindentation of chemical -vapor deposited Al2O3hard coatings at elevated temperatures, Thin Solid Films. 578 (2015) 20 –24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2015.01.069

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2015.01.069 2015

  41. [42]

    Frankberg, J

    E.J. Frankberg, J. Kalikka, F.G. Ferré, L. Joly -Pottuz, T. Salminen, J. Hint ikka, M. Hokka, S. Koneti, T. Douillard, B. Le Saint, P. Kreiml, M.J. Cordill, T. Epicier, D. Stauffer, M. Vanazzi, L. Roiban, J. Akola, F. Di Fonzo, E. Levänen, K. Masenelli-Varlot, Highly ductile amorphous oxide at room temperature and high strain rate, Science (80-. ). 366 (2...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.aav1254 2019

  42. [43]

    Eklund, M

    P. Eklund, M. Sridharan, G. Singh, J. Bøttiger, Thermal stability and phase transformations of γ -/amorphous-Al 2O3 thin films, Plasma Process. Polym. 6 (2009) 907–911. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppap.200932301

    work page doi:10.1002/ppap.200932301 2009

  43. [44]

    Levin, D

    I. Levin, D. Brandon, Metastable Alumina Polymorphs: Crystal Structures and Transition Sequences, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81 (2010) 1995 –2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02581.x. 33

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02581.x 2010

  44. [45]

    Yatsenko, V.P

    D.A. Yatsenko, V.P. P akharukova, S. V. Tsybulya, Low temperature transitional aluminas: Structure specifics and related x-ray diffraction features, Crystals. 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11060690

    work page doi:10.3390/cryst11060690 2021

  45. [46]

    Edlmayr, M

    V. Edlmayr, M. Moser, C. Walter, C. Mitterer, Thermal stability of sputtered Al2O3 coatings, Surf. Coatings Technol. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2009.10.002 2010

  46. [47]

    García Ferré, E

    F. García Ferré, E. Bertarelli, A. Chiodoni, D. Carnelli, D. Gastaldi, P. Vena, M.G. Beghi, F. Di Fonzo, The mechanical properties of a nanocr ystalline Al2O3/a - Al2O3composite coating measured by nanoindentation and Brillouin spectroscopy, Acta Mater. 61 (2013) 2662–2670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.050

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.01.050 2013

  47. [48]

    Fischer-Cripps, Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nan oindentation test data, Surf

    A.C. Fischer-Cripps, Critical review of analysis and interpretation of nan oindentation test data, Surf. Coatings Technol. 200 (2006) 4153 –4165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.03.018 2006

  48. [49]

    Oliver, G.M

    W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments, J. Mater. Res. 7 (1992) 1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.1992.1564

    work page doi:10.1557/jmr.1992.1564 1992

  49. [50]

    Wheeler, J

    J.M. Wheeler, J. Michler, Invited article: Indenter materials for high temperature nanoindentation, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4824710

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4824710 2013

  50. [51]

    Gates -Rector, T

    S. Gates -Rector, T. Blanton, The Powder Diffraction File: a quality materials characterization database, Powder Diffr. 34 (2019) 352 –360. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0885715619000812

    work page doi:10.1017/s0885715619000812 2019

  51. [52]

    Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics, J

    S. Plimpton, Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics, J. Comput. Phys. 117 (1995) 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1995.1039

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 1995

  52. [53]

    Vashishta, R.K

    P. Vashishta, R.K. Kalia, A. Nakano, J.P. Rino, Interaction potentials for alumina and molecular dynamics simulations of amorphous and liquid al umina, J. Appl. Phys. 103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2901171

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2901171 2008

  53. [54]

    Momida, T

    H. Momida, T. Hamada, Y. Takagi, T. Yamamoto, T. Uda, T. Ohno, Theoretical study on dielectric response of amorphous alumina, Phys. Rev. B - Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 73 (2006) 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.054108. 34

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.73.054108 2006

  54. [55]

    Giacomazzi, N.S

    L. Giacomazzi, N.S. Shcheblanov, M.E. Povarnitsyn, Y. Li, A. Mavrič, B. Zupančič, J. Grdadolnik, A. Pasquarello, Infrared spectra in amorphous alumina: A combined ab initio and experimental study, Phys. R ev. Mater. 7 (2023) 1 –14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.045604

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevmaterials.7.045604 2023

  55. [56]

    Domínguez-Gutiérrez, S

    F.J. Domínguez-Gutiérrez, S. Papanikolaou, A. Esfandiarpour, P. Sobkowicz, M. Alava, Nanoindentation of single crystalline Mo: Atomistic defect nucleation and thermomechanical stability, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 826 (2021) 141912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2021.141912

    work page doi:10.1016/j.msea.2021.141912 2021

  56. [57]

    Q. Xu, A. Zaborowska, K. Mulewska, W. Huo, K. Karimi, F.J. Domínguez -Gutiérrez, Ł. Kurpaska, M.J. Alava, S. Papanikolaou, Atomistic insights into nanoinden tation- induced deformation of α -Al2O3 single crystals, Vacuum. 219 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112733

    work page doi:10.1016/j.vacuum.2023.112733 2024

  57. [58]

    Alpert, H.M

    C.P. Alpert, H.M. Chan, S.J. Bennison, B. Lawn, Temperature Dependence of Hardness of Alumina‐Based Ceramics, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 7 1 (1988) C‐371 -C‐373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06394.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1988.tb06394.x 1988

  58. [59]

    Sánchez-González, J.J

    E. Sánchez-González, J.J. Meléndez -Martínez, A. Pajares, P. Miranda, F. Guiberteau, B.R. Lawn, Application of hertzian tests to measure stress -strain characteristics of ceramics at elevated temperatures, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90 (2007) 149 –153. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01339.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1551-2916.2006.01339.x 2007

  59. [60]

    Kollenberg, Plastic deformation of Al2O3 single crystals by indentation at temperatures up to 750° C, J

    W. Kollenberg, Plastic deformation of Al2O3 single crystals by indentation at temperatures up to 750° C, J. Mater. Sci. 23 (1988) 3321 –3325. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00551312

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00551312 1988

  60. [61]

    Munro, Evaluated Material Properties for a Sintered ␣ -Alumina, 28 (1997) 1919– 1928

    R.G. Munro, Evaluated Material Properties for a Sintered ␣ -Alumina, 28 (1997) 1919– 1928

    1997

  61. [62]

    Fox-rabinovich, B.D

    G.S. Fox-rabinovich, B.D. Beake, J.L. Endrino, S.C. Veldhuis, R. Parkinson, Effect of mechanical properties measure d at room and elevated temperatures on the wear resistance of cutting tools with TiAlN and AlCrN coatings, 200 (2006) 5738 –5742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.08.132

    work page doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.08.132 2006

  62. [63]

    Fox -Rabinovich, S.C

    G.S. Fox -Rabinovich, S.C. Veldhuis, V.N. Scvortsov, L.S. Shuster, G.K. Dos baeva, M.S. Migranov, Elastic and plastic work of indentation as a characteristic of wear 35 behavior for cutting tools with nitride PVD coatings, Thin Solid Films. 469–470 (2004) 505–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.07.038

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2004.07.038 2004

  63. [64]

    van der Rest, H

    A. van der Rest, H. Idrissi, F. Henry, A. Favache, D. Schryvers, J. Proost, J.P. Raskin, Q. Van Overmeere, T. Pardoen, Mechanical behavior of ultrathin sputter deposited porous amorphous Al2O3films, Acta Mater. 125 (2017) 27 –37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.037

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2016.11.037 2017

  64. [65]

    Black, D.A

    S.N. Black, D.A. Jefferson, P. Henderson, An electron -optical study of nickel monosulfide, J. Solid State Chem. 53 (1984) 76 –86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022 - 4596(84)90229-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0022 1984

  65. [66]

    Wachtman, W.E

    J.B. Wachtman, W.E. Tefft, D.G. Lam, C.S. Apstein, Dependence of Young ’ s Modulus for Several Oxides, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961) 1754–1759

    1961

  66. [67]

    SOGA, O.L

    N. SOGA, O.L. ANDERSON, High -Temperature Elastic Properties of Polycrystalline MgO and Al2O3, (n.d.) 0–4

  67. [68]

    Zhang, H

    S. Zhang, H. Xie, X. Zeng, P. Hing, Residual stress characterization of dia mond-like carbon coatings by an X -ray diffraction method, Surf. Coatings Technol. 122 (1999) 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00298-4

    work page doi:10.1016/s0257-8972(99)00298-4 1999

  68. [69]

    Gupta, B

    B.K. Gupta, B. Bhushan, Micromechanical properties of amorphous carbon coatings deposited by different deposition techniques, Thin Solid Films. 270 (1995) 391 –398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(95)06699-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0040-6090(95)06699-3 1995

  69. [70]

    M. Bai, K. Kato, N. Umehara, Y. Miyake, Nanoindentation and FEM study of the effect of internal stress on micro/nano mechanical property of thi n CNx films, Thin Solid Films. 377–378 (2000) 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01314-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0040-6090(00)01314-6 2000

  70. [71]

    Frankberg, A

    E.J. Frankberg, A. Lambai, J. Zhang, J. Kalikka, S. Khakalo, B. Paladino, M. Cabrioli, N.G. Mathews, T. Salminen, M. Hokka, J. Akola, A. Kuronen, E. Levänen, F. Di Fonzo, G. Mohanty, Exceptional Microscale Plasticity in Amorphous AluminumOxide at Room Temperature, Adv. Mater. 35 (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202303142

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202303142 2023

  71. [72]

    Zhang, J

    Z.F. Zhang, J. Eckert, L. Schultz, Difference in compressive and tensile fracture mechanisms of Zr59Cu20Al10Ni8Ti3 bulk metallic glass, Acta Mater. 51 (2003) 1167– 36

    2003

  72. [73]

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00521-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s1359-6454(02)00521-9

  73. [74]

    Narasimhan, P

    R. Narasimhan, P. Tandaiya, I. Singh, R.L. Narayan, U. Ramamurty, Fracture in metallic glasses: mechanics and mechanisms, Int. J. Fract. 191 (2015) 53 –75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-015-9995-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10704-015-9995-3 2015

  74. [75]

    Pokluda, M

    J. Pokluda, M. Černý, P. Šandera, M. Šob, Calculations of theoretical strength: State of the art and history, J. Comput. Mater. Des. 11 ( 2004) 1 –28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10820-004-4567-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10820-004-4567-2 2004

  75. [76]

    Amodeo, L

    J. Amodeo, L. Pizzagalli, Modeling the mechanical properties of nanoparticles: A review, Comptes Rendus Phys. 22 (2021) 35–66. https://doi.org/10.5802/CRPHYS.70

    work page doi:10.5802/crphys.70 2021

  76. [77]

    Loiacono, M

    D. Loiacono, M. Vanazzi, B. Paladino, W.-Y. Chen, M. Cabrioli, M. Li, M.G. Beghi, F. Di Fonzo, In -situ kinetic study of irradiation induced crystallization in amorphous Al2O3, J. Nucl. Mater. 588 (2023) 154805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154805

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2023.154805 2023

  77. [78]

    Mavrič, M

    A. Mavrič, M. Valant, C. Cui, Z.M. Wang, Advanced applications of amorphous alumina: From nano to bulk, J. Non. Cryst. Solids. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119493

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119493 2019

  78. [79]

    Bolvardi, M

    H. Bolvardi, M. To Baben, F. Nahif, D. Music, V. Schnabel, K.P. Shaha, S. Mráz, J. Bednarcik, J. Michalikova, J.M. Schneider, Effect of Si additions on thermal stability and the phase transition sequence of sputtered amorphous alumina thin films, J. Appl. Phys. 117 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905296

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4905296 2015

  79. [80]

    Ragan, T

    D.D. Ragan, T. Mates, D.R. Clarke, Effect of yttrium and erbium ions on epitaxial phase transformations in alumina, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 86 (2003) 541 –45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03338.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03338.x 2003

  80. [81]

    W. Gu, M. Shen, X. Chang, Y. Wang, J. Wang, Gelification process to prepare phosphate modified alumina: Study on structure and surface properties, J. Alloys Compd. 441 (2007) 311–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.102

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.102 2007